Court dismisses Kanu’s fundamental rights suit
KANU– The Federal High Court, Abuja, has dismissed a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) against the Department of State Services (DSS).
Kanu, in the suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/482/2022 and filed by his lawyer, had sued the DSS, its Director General, and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as 1st to 3rd respondents respectively.
In the suit, the IPOB leader alleged that the DSS subjected him to different inhuman treatments, including denying him his right to wear any clothes of his choice like the Igbo traditional attire called “Isi-Agu,” while in their facility or any time he appeared in court for his trial.
He alleged that the security outfit, while allowing other inmates in their custody the freedom to choose and wear any clothes of their choice, he was restricted to wearing only a single clothe.
The applicant also accused the DSS of subjecting him to torture, and breach of right to dignity, among others. He, therefore, sought an order directing the respondents to allow him to put on any clothes of his choice while in the facility or when appearing in public.
But in a counter affidavit filed by the DSS and its DG, they urged the court to dismiss Kanu’s claim.
According to the DSS, the applicant (Kanu) is kept in their facility where every other suspect is kept. They said it was untrue that other suspects were allowed to put on any clothes of their choice, including Hausa and Yoruba traditional clothing.
The DSS further argued that its facility was not a recreational centre or traditional festival where Kanu and other suspects would be allowed to adore themselves in their respective traditional attires. It added that there is a Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) on dress code by detainees in its facility.
“That in line with global best practices, persons in the 1st and 2nd respondents’ facility are allowed to wear only plain clothes, which do not bear symbols, writings, colours and insignias that are offensive to any religion, ethnic group or even the Nigeria state in general,” it said.
The respondents accused Kanu’s family of bringing traditional attires and other clothing with Biafra insignias and a pair of red shoes decorated with shining beads for him to wear in custody and also to attend court for his trial.
According to DSS, the clothes have colours of the non-existing Biafra Republic, which is the subject matter of the applicant’s criminal trial.
They said the Isi-Agu attire, popularly called chieftaincy attire, was not a suitable dress for persons in detention facilities and was against its SOP.
The respondents also argued that Justice Binta Nyako, where Kanu is currently standing trial, had directed that he be allowed to wear any plain clothe of his choice and that anything contrary would contravene the court’s directive.
Delivering the judgment on Thursday, Justice Omotosho held that the right to human dignity is contained in Section 34 of the 1999 Constitution.
According to the court, a right to human dignity relates to the right against torture, inhuman treatment, among others.
Consequently, Justice Omotosho held that Kanu’s case did not relate to torture or forced labour, adding that a right to dignity was not a right to change clothes as an inmate in a prison.
“The applicant cannot come to court to seek for rights which are not in the constitution,’ he said.
Besides, Justice Omotosho held that Kanu failed to provide the photographs and names of inmates, who were allowed to wear different attires while in custody. He described the IPOB leader’s allegations as “a hypothesis without concrete evidence.”
The judge, consequently, dismissed the case for lacking merit.
