Connect with us

Business

Nigeria’s Captured State: How MultiChoice Weaponized Laws to Protect Its Empire

Published

on

Nigeria’s Captured State: How MultiChoice Weaponized Laws to Protect Its Empire

THE CAPTURED BENCH: HOW MULTICHOICE AND ITS ELITE LAWYERS WEAPONIZED NIGERIA’S COURTS TO CRIPPLE DEMOCRACY, DEFY REGULATIONS AND EXPLOIT THE NATION

Price hikes and silenced watchdogs

In March 2025, Nigerians woke up to find that DStv and GOtv subscription prices had shot up by 20-25%. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) immediately announced plans to investigate. Consumer advocacy groups were hopeful. Finally, someone would check whether Multichoice was abusing its market power, But once again, the courts stepped in. Multichoice’s lawyers, led by Moyosore Onibanjo, rushed to file an ex parte motion, claiming the FCCPC had no right to regulate pricing in a “free market.” Justice Omotosho issued an order that stopped the FCCPC from even looking into the matter. No debate. No hearing. Just a swift injunction.

For many Nigerians, this was the final straw. Complaints poured in on social media: “Why can’t our regulators do anything?” and “Is DStv above the law?” People couldn’t help noticing that every time an agency tried to act, a new court order appeared.

Corporate Leviathan

In Nigeria’s rapidly evolving media landscape, Multichoice Nigeria Limited, operators of DStv and GOtv, has long positioned itself as a market leader. However, recent revelations from the National Security Advisor’s office paint a starkly different picture: one of a corporate giant systematically deploying legal warfare to evade accountability, undermine regulatory bodies, and render agencies like the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) powerless. Over the past decade, Multichoice has weaponized Nigeria’s judicial system, securing a litany of court orders to stall investigations, invalidate regulations, and shield itself from sanctions. This report unravels the company’s calculated strategy to transform regulators and security agencies into “toothless bulldogs,” highlighting key cases, complicit judicial actors, and the broader implications for Nigeria’s regulatory framework.

In Nigeria, where media freedom once thrived, Multichoice Nigeria (owners of DStv and GOtv) have used legal tricks to dodge regulators and crush competition. What started as a success story turned into a corporate takeover of Nigeria’s broadcast industry. Multichoice’s legal team weaponized court technicalities to weaken government agencies, turning oversight into a joke.

The 2021 Default Judgment Debacle (FHC/ABJ/CS/1386/2021) Incorporated Trustees of Media Rights Vs. NBC
It was a brisk morning in Abuja when news of Justice James Omotosho’s decision sent shockwaves through Nigeria’s broadcasting circles. In a case that had once promised to empower the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), the judge instead dealt a stunning blow to the commission’s authority—one that many believe would change the fate of broadcast regulation in the country.

The Incorporated Trustees of Media Rights took the NBC to court. They contended that the commission’s sanctions were not only heavy-handed but also a violation of natural justice. Justice Omotosho had already handed down a sweeping judgment—a permanent injunction that barred the NBC from levying any fines on broadcast stations.

In a bid to overturn the ruling, the NBC filed a motion that the earlier judgment was reached without due process. The NBC had sought to sanction Multichoice for breaching broadcast codes. Justice Omotosho dismissed their plea, and critics argue this set a dangerous precedent: regulators could now be punished for procedural oversights while corporations enjoyed judicial leniency.

This case set a precedent for regulators’ procedural missteps being exploited to entrench corporate impunity. By framing the NBC as negligent, Multichoice and allied entities secured judicial cover to bypass accountability. The significance of the ruling in this case, is to the effect that a regulator does not have the powers to impose sanctions for a breach of a defined law or regulation, which is an anomaly.

The 2024 AGI Heist (FHC/ABJ/CS/652/2024) Multichoice Nigeria Ltd. & Details Nigeria Ltd. v. NBC)
In a sweeping 2024 judgment, Justice Omotosho again ruled in favor of Multichoice, declaring Section 2(10)(b) of the NBC Code ultra vires for mandating 2.5% of broadcasters’ gross income as Annual Gross Income (AGI). The court redefined “annual income” as revenue minus production costs, slashing Multichoice’s liability. It also upheld a disputed 2020 waiver agreement, binding the NBC to accept fixed payments far below statutory rates. The ruling not only invalidated critical NBC regulations but also rewarded Multichoice for years of underpayment, costing the federal government an estimated N32.5 billion in lost revenue. The pattern again was to invoke functus officio to block regulatory appeals and framing Multichoice as the “vigilant” victim against “indolent” agencies.

The Price Hike That Sparked a Legal Firestorm

FCCPC vs. MultiChoice: A Legal Battle Over Price Hike
On March 1, 2025, MultiChoice raised DStv and GOtv subscription fees by 20-25%, citing rising costs. The move, barely a year after the last increase, triggered public outrage, with many accusing the company of exploiting its market dominance.

However, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) had summoned MultiChoice and its CEO on February 27, to appear for an investigative hearing to explain its decision to increase rates starting on March 1. The commission expressed concerns about frequent price hikes, potential abuse of market leadership, and anti-competitive practices. However, instead of complying, MultiChoice filed an ex parte motion at the Federal High Court in Abuja on March 3, seeking to block FCCPC’s intervention.

On March 12, Justice James Omotosho known for his pro-corporate rulings, granted Multichoice’s request. In his decision, he restrained the FCCPC from taking any “administrative steps” against the company pending the determination of the case. The ruling effectively shields Multichoice from regulatory scrutiny, allowing it to proceed with the price hike while the FCCPC remains powerless to act. Critics have slammed the decision as a blow to consumer rights and a victory for corporate impunity.

The 2025 Ex Parte Order: EFCC and NBC Gagged
In a recent court order granted in March 2025 and filed under Suit No: FHC/L/CS/179/25 (Multichoice & Details Nigeria Vs. EFCC, NBC & Anor) reveals Multichoice’s desperation to avoid scrutiny. The EFCC had launched an investigation into the company’s alleged underpayment of Annual Gross Income (AGI) and refusal to submit financial records dating back to 2014. Instead of complying, Multichoice accused the EFCC and NBC of “harassment” and violating its “fundamental rights.”

Justice Omotosho, without hearing the regulators’ side, issued a sweeping injunction:
a. Blocked Arrests: Barred the EFCC from inviting or detaining Multichoice staff.
b. Froze Investigations: Halted demands for financial documents, including evidence of AGI remittances.

The ruling effectively halts Nigeria’s anti-graft agency from probing (a) ₦32.5 billion in unpaid levies (as established in the 2024 AGI case) and alleged tax evasion tied to creative accounting of “programming costs.”

The Legal Playbook: How Courts Became Corporate Tools
Multichoice’s tactics follow a ruthless blueprint:

1. Forum Shopping: Multichoice repeatedly filed cases in the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court, where judges like Omotosho became reliable allies. Legal experts accuse the company of “judicial engineering”—handpicking courts to secure favourable rulings that redefine regulatory authority.

2. Killing Competition: When the NBC amended its code in 2022 to break Multichoice’s stranglehold on exclusive content (like Premier League rights), the company sued. Justice A. Lewis-Allagoa sided with Multichoice, declaring that “private contracts trump over public interest.” The decision cemented Multichoice’s monopoly, leaving smaller rivals unable to compete.

3. Redefining the Rules: In 2024, Multichoice challenged the NBC’s Annual Gross Income (AGI), arguing that its 2.5% fee should apply to profits, not gross revenue. Justice Omotosho agreed, slashing Multichoice’s contributions by billions of naira. The ruling starved the NBC of funds meant to support local broadcasters, widening the gap between corporate giants and struggling independents.

4. Pre-emptive Strikes: At the first hint of regulatory action, Multichoice files lawsuits to paralyze investigations. In 2025, when the Federal Competition and Consumer
5. Protection Commission (FCCPC) probed sudden price hikes for DStv subscriptions, Multichoice secured an exparte order from Justice Omotosho—blocking the inquiry before regulators could present their case. Critics called it a “judicial coup.”

Consequently, Nigeria’s judiciary stands accused of enabling corporate impunity. Justice
James Kolawole Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, emerges as the central figure in Multichoice’s legal fortress. Between 2021 and 2025, he presided over at least seven high stakes cases involving the company, each time ruling in its favour with near-scripted consistency.

The Fallout: Toothless Bulldogs and a Captured State
The cumulative effect of these rulings is a regulatory landscape where:
* NBC is financially crippled, unable to collect lawful levies or enforce content rules.
* FCCPC is barred from investigating blatant consumer exploitation.
* Judicial Complicity: Courts prioritize corporate rights over public interest, with certain judges becoming repeat enablers.

The lawyers behind the scenes
Behind all of Multichoice’s courtroom triumphs are two powerful Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs): M.J. Onigbanjo and Moyosore Onibanjo. Their tactics are legendary among legal circles in Abuja.

a. Onigbanjo the Codebreaker: Known for pre-emptive strikes, he files lawsuits against regulators just before they finalize audits or announce sanctions. By flipping the script, he forces agencies to defend themselves rather than go on the offensive.
b. Onibanjo the Ex Parte Maestro: Skilled at obtaining secretive court orders, he convinces judges that immediate action is needed—often without the regulators being present. Critics have called this “judicial malpractice.”

Their Playbook:
1. Judicial Engineering: Handpick courts and judges.
2. Weaponize Rights: Frame investigations as “rights violations.”
3. Delay Tactics: Adjourn cases for years (e.g., the EFCC suit is stalled until May 2025).

The Global Playbook – How Multichoice Replicated Its Nigerian Model and the Pushback
While Nigeria’s anti-graft agencies and courts remain paralyzed by legal maneuvers favouring Multichoice Nigeria, other African nations are mounting fierce resistance against the South African media giant’s monopolistic tactics. From Malawi’s bold expulsion of the company to South Africa’s billion-dollar fines, a pattern of defiance is emerging across the continent—one that starkly contrasts with Nigeria’s capitulation to corporate impunity.

Malawi’s Stand: “Follow the Rules or Leave”
In August 2023, Malawi became a beacon of regulatory courage. When Multichoice attempted to hike DStv subscription prices without approval, the Malawi Communications Regulatory Authority (MACRA) secured a court injunction to block the increase. Multichoice retaliated by halting new subscriptions and threatening to exit the country. “We don’t negotiate with bullies,” declared MACRA Director General Daud Suleman. By September 2023, Multichoice withdrew entirely, abandoning 200,000 subscribers. “Malawi’s laws protect its people, not foreign profits,” Suleman added.

Sierra Leone: Slapped with a “Profiteering” Fine
Sierra Leone’s National Telecommunication Commission (NATCOM) took a similarly hardline stance in 2023, fining Multichoice R968,000 (Le250 million) for “unfairly profiteering” after the company blamed currency fluctuations for price hikes. NATCOM Chair Momoh Conteh accused Multichoice of “exploiting our people under the guise of exchange rates.” The regulator threatened to shut down DStv operations unless the fine was paid within a week—a move hailed by consumer groups.

Kenya’s Football Revolution: Breaking the Monopoly
In 2017, Kenya’s Competition Authority (CAK) ordered Multichoice to share exclusive English Premier League rights with rivals like Zuku TV, declaring the company’s monopoly “anticompetitive and destructive.” After a two-year legal battle, CAK Director Wang’ombe Kariuki announced: “No single entity can hoard content that belongs to the people.” The ruling opened Kenya’s airwaves to fair competition, a model now praised across East Africa.

South Africa’s $3.7 Billion Reckoning
In its home country, Multichoice faced its toughest blow yet. In 2017, South Africa’s
Competition Commission found the company guilty of anti-competitive practices, including hoarding sports rights to crush rivals. The penalty? A staggering 10% of annual revenue—$3.7 billion.

“No corporation is above the law here,” said Commissioner Tembinkosi Bonakele. By 2022, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) had clawed back another $500 million from Multichoice after uncovering years of profit under-declarations.

Nigeria: The Captured Market

While its neighbours fight back, Nigeria remains a glaring exception. In 2023, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) settled a N1.8tn ($1.27bn) tax claim for the Multichoice Nigeria operation and a $342m claim for value-added tax dispute with Multichoice for just N35.4bn ($37.3m) —a colossal and unjustified discount.

Breaking the stranglehold

In hushed conversations across government offices and civil society groups, there’s a growing belief that Nigeria must reclaim its regulatory powers—or risk sinking deeper into a state of corporate capture. Some propose that the National Judicial Council (NJC) investigate the repeated pattern of rulings in Multichoice’s favor. Others call for a new Broadcast Industry Reform Act that would strengthen the NBC’s authority. Also, the National Security Adviser must probe the question whether judges collude with Multichoice’s legal team and whether there is economic sabotage whereby preemptive lawsuits have been used to stifle Nigeria’s broadcast sector regarding the Multichoice’s ₦32.5 billion levy evasion.

Nigerians are frustrated by skyrocketing subscription fees and a sense of helplessness. Yet without coordinated action from the courts, lawmakers, and the executive branch, these calls for justice may remain just that—calls.

For now, Multichoice continues to operate in Nigeria with near-impunity, while the rest of the continent moves toward stricter enforcement. The central question remains: “Will Nigeria’s institutions stand up for the public interest, or will the nation remain a haven for corporate giants who know how to work the system”?

Until something changes, the courts will keep issuing orders, regulators will keep hitting walls, and ordinary Nigerians will keep wondering why the rules seem to favour the powerful over the people. The stage is set for a showdown—one that could either reaffirm Nigeria’s commitment to fair governance or cement its status as a captured state under the gavel of judges and unconscionable practices of members of the Bar.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Business

RABIU, ELUMELU STRENGTHEN CAPITAL ALLIANCE AS BUA FOODS HITS ₦1.77TRN REVENUE

Published

on

 

RABIU, ELUMELU ALIGN ON CAPITAL, SCALE, AND INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION AS BUA FOODS POSTS N1.77 TRILLION REVENUE, N28 DIVIDEND

Lagos, Nigeria | March 31, 2026

Nigeria’s industrial and financial heavyweights moved to deepen a partnership that has quietly underpinned decades of enterprise growth, as the Founder and Chairman of BUA Group, Abdul Samad Rabiu, hosted the Chairman of United Bank for Africa, Tony Elumelu and his executive management team at BUA Group’s corporate headquarters in Lagos.

 

RABIU, ELUMELU STRENGTHEN CAPITAL ALLIANCE AS BUA FOODS HITS ₦1.77TRN REVENUE

More than a visit, the engagement brought together two institutions whose alignment of capital and industrial capacity has consistently translated into scale, execution, and long-term value creation across Nigeria and Africa’s economy.

At the centre of discussions was a renewed push to expand financing frameworks for large-scale manufacturing, deepen support for domestic production, and unlock the next phase of growth across food, infrastructure, and export-oriented value chains.

Rabiu, reflecting on a relationship that spans nearly three decades, traced its evolution from the early days of Standard Trust Bank to its present form as a mature, trusted partnership with UBA.

“Enduring partnerships are not built on transactions, but on conviction,” Rabiu said. “What we have built with UBA and the Nigerian financial industry over the years is a shared understanding of where Nigeria is going and what it will take to get there. That alignment remains as strong today as it was at the beginning.”

Elumelu underscored the strategic importance of the relationship, positioning it within a broader vision of African-led growth.

“Institutions like BUA Group demonstrate what is possible when long-term capital meets disciplined execution,” Elumelu said. “Our role is to continue enabling that scale, supporting enterprises that are not only growing, but reshaping the Nigerian economy.”

The meeting signals a continued convergence between capital and industry at a time when Nigeria’s growth story is increasingly being driven by indigenous scale, operational depth, positive government action, and sustained investment in real sectors.

In a parallel demonstration of that scale, BUA Foods, a BUA company, has released its audited results for the financial year ended December 31, 2025, delivering revenue of N1.77 trillion, a 16 per cent increase from N1.53 trillion in 2024.

The performance reflects sustained demand across its core segments including sugar, flour, pasta, and rice, alongside continued execution of its expansion strategy.

Gross profit rose to N737.26 billion, up from N540.82 billion, while profit after tax surged by 95 per cent to N518.4 billion, compared to N265.99 billion in the prior year.

Earnings per share increased to N28.80, reinforcing the strength of the Company’s earnings profile.

In line with its commitment to shareholder value, the Board has proposed a dividend of N28 per share, representing a 115 per cent increase from N13 in 2024, with a total proposed payout of N504 billion, subject to shareholder approval.

Cost of sales stood at N1.037 trillion, while total assets grew by 27 per cent to N1.39 trillion, reflecting sustained investment across operations and the broader value chain.

Speaking on the results, the Chairman of BUA Foods, Abdul Samad Rabiu said, “Our 2025 performance reflects a business that is not only growing, but scaling with discipline. We are building capacity, deepening local production, and delivering consistent value to shareholders, all while positioning for the future.”

The Managing Director, Engr. Ayodele Abioye, added; “Our strategy remains to expand capacity, strengthen market presence, and optimise the full supply chain. The demand signals are strong, and we are well positioned to sustain this momentum.”

Taken together, the meeting between BUA Group and UBA, alongside BUA Foods’ record performance, points to a broader shift for Nigeria. Nigeria’s growth is increasingly being shaped by institutions that combine scale, capital discipline, and long-term vision and should be seen as not just an expansion but a consolidation of industrial leadership.

Continue Reading

Business

UK State Visit: Governor Lawal Eyes Investment Boost for Zamfara’s Economy

Published

on

Governor Dauda Lawal Set To Unlock Zamfara’s Economic Potentials with Tinubu’s UK State Visit

By Oladapo Sofowora

As President Bola Ahmed Tinubu commences his landmark state visit to the United Kingdom the first by a Nigerian leader in 37 years, the inclusion of Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal in the presidential entourage is not a fluke; rather, it signals a strategic opportunity for the northwest state to transform its economic fortunes. Beyond the ceremonial pageantry, this high-level diplomatic engagement holds concrete prospects for Zamfara, particularly in agriculture and solid minerals development, sectors where the state possesses a comparative advantage but has struggled to attract meaningful investment. With Governor Lawal working assiduously to generate more IGR for the state and also position it as an economically advanced hub within the region with the construction of a Cargo Airport, this ushers in an era where the state is about to witness a great turnaround championed by Governor Lawal.

The timing of the bilateral engagement between the UK and Nigeria is significant, as the trade surplus between the two countries has reached a record £8.1 billion annually, and both nations are intensifying collaboration under the UK–Nigeria Enhanced Trade and Investment Partnership (ETIP) framework.

According to economic pundits, key sectors targeted for cooperation include trade and investment, energy transition, solid minerals development, and security collaboration – all areas with direct implications for subnational governments like Zamfara. For Governor Lawal, being part of this engagement provides direct access to British investors and development partners that could reshape Zamfara’s economic landscape.

Governor Lawal arrives in London with ambitious development plans to corroborate the budget he presented in December 2024, a ₦861.3 billion budget proposal for the 2025 fiscal year submitted to the Zamfara State House of Assembly, a document he described as “a roadmap for transformation and a declaration that Zamfara will rise stronger.” The budget allocates ₦714.05 billion (83 per cent) to capital expenditure, with sectoral allocations including ₦86 billion for agriculture and significant provisions for infrastructure development. However, these ambitious plans require corresponding revenue streams and investment partnerships to allow them to materialise and reach their full potential.

The governor has been implementing domestic reforms to strengthen the state’s fiscal position. In March 2025, he abolished cash revenue collection across Zamfara, directing all Ministries, Departments, and Agencies to adopt digital systems for revenue collection. His administration set an Internally Generated Revenue target of ₦38 billion to ₦42 billion for 2025, building on 2024’s revenue performance of ₦358.9 billion. With all these impeccable performance indicators, domestic resource mobilisation alone cannot fund the scale of transformation he envisions for the state. The only way to scale up is through Foreign Direct Investment, particularly in agriculture and mining, which represents the missing piece of Zamfara’s development puzzle.

Zamfara State is predominantly agrarian, with the majority of its indigenous population engaged in farming. The state’s favourable climate and vast arable land position it as a potential breadbasket for northern Nigeria. However, the sector remains largely subsistence-based, with limited processing capacity and weak linkages to export markets.

The UK state visit offers opportunities to change this dynamic. British companies have demonstrated growing interest in Nigerian agriculture, as evidenced by Twinings Ovaltine’s £24 million manufacturing facility launch in Lagos its first in Africa creating over 100 direct jobs. Similar investments could be directed toward Zamfara’s agricultural sector, which would be a boost and also create more income for farmers in the production of specific crops with value-addition potential. These include:

Zamfara lies within Nigeria’s cotton belt, but the state lacks ginning and textile processing facilities. Partnerships with British textile companies could establish local cotton processing capacity, capturing value currently lost to exports of raw lint. Groundnut is also a major export commodity from northern Nigeria, but production has declined due to neglect of the sector. British confectionery and food processing companies represent potential off-takers for processed groundnuts.

With growing demand for animal feed and industrial starch, Maize and Sorghum crops offer processing opportunities. British agribusiness firms with expertise in agro-processing could establish milling and processing facilities in Zamfara.

With Sesame Seeds already an export crop, sesame production could benefit from improved processing and certification to meet international standards, particularly for the UK market.

For Zamfara, “opportunities for Nigerian businesses” translates directly to potential agricultural partnerships that could modernise farming practices, establish processing infrastructure, and create export linkages.

Perhaps the most significant potential gains for Zamfara lie in the solid minerals sector. The state is renowned for its gold deposits, which have historically attracted both licensed operators and illegal miners. However, the sector has been characterised by informality, environmental degradation, security challenges, and loss of revenue to the state.

Recent developments at the federal level underscore the growing importance of the minerals sector. The Federal Government recently announced the commencement of operations at a high-purity gold refinery in Lagos – a private-sector initiative led by Kian Smith in partnership with UAE-based Suvarna Royal Gold Trading. For Zamfara, this means advocating for gold processing facilities within the state, not merely exporting overseas, but creating a gold refinery which helps create more jobs within the mining value chain. Governor Lawal’s presence in London provides an opportunity to position Zamfara as a preferred location for one of these gold refineries, particularly with British investment partners.

In a bid to redefine the regulatory framework and investment readiness, Zamfara has been taking steps to create an enabling environment for mineral investment. In February 2025, the Federal Ministry of Solid Mineral Development, in collaboration with the Zamfara State Mineral Resources and Environmental Management Committee (MIREMCO), convened a stakeholders’ meeting with quarry operators, mineral processors, and gold dealers to promote safety and regulatory compliance. The Federal Mines Officer in Zamfara State emphasised that both the federal and Zamfara State governments are determined to promote responsible mining practices that enhance security, safeguard the environment, and ensure that solid mineral resources contribute meaningfully to economic development.

This regulatory clarity is essential for attracting foreign investors. British mining companies and equipment manufacturers require assurance that their investments will operate within a predictable legal framework. The UK–Nigeria ETIP discussions in London provide a platform for Governor Lawal to articulate Zamfara’s investment readiness and regulatory improvements directly to potential partners.

No discussion of Zamfara’s economic potential can ignore the security challenges that have plagued the state. Banditry, kidnapping, and community conflicts have disrupted farming, hindered mining operations, and deterred investment. Governor Lawal’s 2025 budget allocates ₦45 billion to public order and safety, recognising that security is foundational to economic development. The UK visit offers opportunities for security collaboration. Improved security cooperation between Nigeria and the UK could translate to enhanced capacity to protect farming communities and mining sites, creating conditions for agricultural and mineral investments to flourish.

As Governor Lawal engages with British investors and policymakers, he would do well to study how other resource-rich regions have successfully attracted investment while ensuring local benefits. For Zamfara under Governor Lawal, the lesson is clear: attracting investment in extraction must be accompanied by deliberate strategies to build local processing capacity. Simply exporting raw gold or agricultural commodities perpetuates the “resource trap” that has left many African regions impoverished despite abundant natural wealth.

If Governor Lawal’s participation in the UK state visit yields tangible results, Zamfara could experience, in agriculture, British investment in agro-processing facilities, creating jobs for local farmers and capturing value from crops like cotton, groundnuts, and sesame. Technical partnerships to improve farming practices and access to UK markets for certified organic or fair-trade products.

In solid minerals, partnerships with British mining companies for responsible gold extraction, potentially including a gold refinery within Zamfara. Technical assistance for artisanal miners to formalise operations and improve safety. Investment in environmental remediation of degraded mining areas.

For Zamfara State, Governor Lawal’s inclusion in the presidential entourage transforms a diplomatic milestone into a concrete opportunity for subnational economic development. The state’s abundant agricultural land, mineral wealth, and a population eager for economic opportunities hold immense potential. The journey from potential to prosperity is long, but it begins with a single step or in this case, a transatlantic flight carrying Zamfara’s hopes to the corridors of British power and finance.

Continue Reading

Business

Oceangate Engineering Oil & Gas LTD to appeal Federal High ruling over forfeiture assets

Published

on

*Oceangate Engineering Oil & Gas LTD to appeal Federal High ruling over forfeiture assets*

 

 

Oceangate Engineering Oil & Gas Limited has said it will appeal to the recent ruling of the Federal High Court ordering the forfeiture of certain assets.

 

Barr. Nnenna Onyeaso, the Company Secretary said in a statement on Thursday insisting that neither the company nor its leadership was found guilty of any wrongdoing.

 

Onyeaso said that the firm has described the court’s decision as a civil asset forfeiture order based on suspicion rather than proof, stressing that the judgment did not establish any criminal liability against the organisation.

 

According to her, the company maintain that it has already directed its legal team to file an appeal, expressing confidence in the judicial process and the outcome of a thorough review of the case.

 

“To be clear, this ruling is a civil asset forfeiture order with no finding of wrongdoing against Oceangate or its leadership.

 

“The court’s decision rested on a legal standard of suspicion, not proof, and it is one we intend to pursue fully through the appeals process,” she said in a statement.

The firm secretary also said that Oceangate has reiterated its belief in the rule of law, noting that the appellate system exists to address such outcomes.

 

She added that the company remained confident that the facts of the case will ultimately affirm its integrity and business practices.

 

Onyeaso said that the firm also emphasised that its operations remained unaffected, stating that it continues to provide employment for many Nigerians while contributing to the country’s energy sector and broader economy.

 

“We have always believed in the ability of the judicial process, and that belief has not wavered,” she added.

 

She noted that Oceangate further expressed appreciation to its employees, partners, and clients for their continued support amid the development, assuring stakeholders of its commitment to transparency and accountability.

 

The Secretary said that the company reaffirmed its confidence in Nigeria as a viable destination for investment, describing the country as a land of equity, growth, and opportunity.

 

“We remain committed to the continued growth of our business and the communities we serve as we are optimistic that justice will prevail at the end of the legal process.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending