Connect with us

Business

PORT HARCOURT REFINERY AND THE TRUTH WE MUST KNOW* By Eguono King

Published

on

Port Harcourt Refinery Stays Active: NNPC Denounces Sabotage Rumors

*PORT HARCOURT REFINERY AND THE TRUTH WE MUST KNOW*

By Eguono King

 

The story of the Port Harcourt Refinery’s alleged operation is one that stands out as a significant lesson in the developing tale of Nigeria’s petroleum industry. It is replete with deceit, laced with ineptitude, and a violation of public confidence. The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited’s (NNPCL) Group Chief Executive Officer (GCEO), Mele Kyari, has once again demonstrated that he is better at publicity stunts than at executing true leadership. His recent statements regarding the refinery are not only false, but they also represent a larger systemic breakdown that jeopardizes the future of Nigeria’s oil industry.

PORT HARCOURT REFINERY AND THE TRUTH WE MUST KNOW*
By Eguono King

It would take just a little digging to unpack the layers of deception surrounding the Port Harcourt Refinery. Kyari’s role in perpetuating this fraud is now very clear to President Tinubu to see him for what he truly is: an inherited problem from the Buhari administration who must be pruned from his administration and held accountable for the grave injustice done to Nigerians. The oil sector is too critical to Nigeria’s economy and national security to be left in the hands of unaccountable individuals.

It would be important to understand that the Port Harcourt Refinery has long served as a representation of Nigeria’s faltering oil sector. Once a ray of hope for the country’s ability to produce its own refined petroleum products, it has been enmeshed in political mismanagement, corruption, and operational inefficiency for decades. Nigerians are now dependent on imported petroleum products since the refinery has not lived up to expectations despite billions of dollars in alleged “rehabilitation” works.

In this context, many knowledgeable observers already viewed Kyari’s statement of the refinery’s purported functionality with skepticism. And rightly so: further investigation has shown that the refinery has not actually started refining Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) as stated. Rather, the entire story seems to have been made up to score cheap political points and divert attention away from the NNPCL leadership’s persistent failure.

The scope of this fraud that NNPCL masterminded under Kyari’s direction is demonstrated by a two-phased reports.

Firstly, a quick observation of this charade highlights a stark similarity between the Port Harcourt Refinery and the doomed Nigeria Airways project. It can be recalled that the Nigerian Airways was a ponzi joke which lasted for a while, and was cunningly used to siphon public funds under the pretense of developing our aviation sector. These programs have come to reflect the level of incompetence and deceit going on in the government. The refinery’s touted functionality is nothing more than a flightless dream – an obvious mirage designed to manipulate and sway public perception.

Secondly, information from a whistleblowers within NNPCL have revealed the shocking reality: PMS is not being refined at all by the refinery. These insiders claim that NNPCL has resorted to blending imported products such as Naphtha and cracked petroleum resins, to provide the illusion of domestic refining. This deceitful behavior not only erodes public confidence but also calls into question the integrity of NNPCL’s leadership. The revelation that parts of the refinery capable of producing PMS are still non-functional further discredits Kyari’s claims. It is now evident that the trucking of petroleum products from the refinery was staged, with NNPCL relying on external purchases to mask the refinery’s continued dormancy.

There has been a pattern of mismanagement, dishonesty, and a blatant disregard for accountability during Mele Kyari’s time as NNPCL’s GCEO. A number of his acts have undermined trust in NNPCL, its capacity to fulfill its purpose, and his handling of the Port Harcourt Refinery issue is just the most recent. The tenure of Kyari’s leadership has seen the oil industry devolved into a theater of unfulfilled promises. From botched refinery restoration initiatives to dubious financial dealings, Kyari has continuously and consistently prioritized short-term optics above long-term fixes. His leadership style has been defined by a lack of transparency and a reluctance to confront the systemic problems that the oil and gas industry Is facing. The question of concern remains, Why is President Bola Tinubu still working with such burden in his administration?

The Port Harcourt Refinery debacle exemplifies Kyari’s modus operandi: using elaborate publicity stunts to mask underlying failures. By falsely claiming that the refinery is operational, Kyari has not only misled Nigerians but also jeopardized the credibility of NNPCL at a critical time when the nation is grappling with economic challenges and rising energy costs.

The damage Inflicted by Mele Kyari on Nigeria’s oil and gas sector extends beyond immediate financial and operational losses, it has deeply undermined public trust in the industry and government. For decades, Nigerians have been promised a robust and self-sufficient refining sector, yet time and again, these promises have been betrayed. The Port Harcourt Refinery fiasco symbolizes the culmination of years of mismanagement and deceit, and the public’s patience is wearing thin. His actions are a stark betrayal of confidence imposed in him by his employer, the president. Without he himself realizing it, he has created a subconscious, deep-seated longing for the sort of invidiously stratified, poor regime that’s being strengthened with every bad Policy and public stunts he has ever adopted for a cover-up.

Kyari must be held accountable for his acts if Nigeria’s petroleum industry is to regain public confidence. President Tinubu needs to take firm action to stop the corruption in NNPCL and acknowledge Kyari as a liability that was passed down from the Buhari administration. The Port Harcourt Refinery allegations and other contentious choices taken during Kyari’s leadership should first be the subject of an impartial investigation. Finding the entire scope of the deceit and identifying the syndicates he employed in deceiving the public should be the goals of this investigation.

Secondly, NNPCL’s operations and leadership need to be completely overhauled, because it’s obvious that with the level of corruption going on there, nothing good will come from such leadership. A new generation of leaders dedicated to transparency and commitment must be introduced, and the culture of impunity that Kyari has fostered must be destroyed.

Lastly, real refinery restoration initiatives that are led by professionals and devoid of political interference must be given top priority by the government. Only by establishing a viable, self-sufficient refining industry will Nigeria’s reliance on imported petroleum products be lessened as a national security threat.

It is a fact that , “From error to error, one discovers the entire truth,” Sigmund Freud once said. In other words, errors in speech and in writing sometimes serve as lenses that help reveal an unconscious, suppressed, or subdued desire or internal thought. Nigerians have endured this multiple errors thrown at them, and now it’s time to embrace the truth. Kyari’s actions are intentional errors that were made to profit some few individuals at the expense of the livelihood of millions of individuals. Mr President error is in retaining a catastrophe like Kyari in his administration up till this present moment, and it will be a great disservice to the country if he doesn’t remove him from his position.

To tell Nigerians the truth, Mele Kyari’s tenure as GCEO of NNPCL has been a disaster for Nigeria’s oil and gas sector and for the future of millions of Nigerians dependent on it. His deceptive claims about the Port Harcourt Refinery are a proven stark reminder of the dangers of entrusting critical national assets to individuals who lack the vision and integrity to manage them effectively. One of the biggest enablers of corruption and inefficiency in Nigeria’s oil sector is the culture of impunity that allows officials like Kyari to operate without fear of accountability. This must change. A strong message needs to be sent that no one, regardless of position or influence, is above the law.

The Port Harcourt Refinery controversy is more than just a scandal to be debated upon, it is a reflection of the systemic dysfunction that has plagued Nigeria’s oil sector for decades. The final decision is in the hands of Mr President if he’s truly conscious of implementing his renewed hope agenda. President Tinubu has a unique opportunity to chart a new course for Nigeria’s petroleum sector. By confronting the failures of the past and taking bold steps to address the systemic issues within NNPCL, he can lay the foundation for a brighter, more sustainable future.

Kyari must be seen for what he is: a menace to the oil sector, a disappointment to the presidency, a liability, and a remnant of the failed policies of the Buhari administration that must be excised for the good of the nation. It is time for him to be pruned and convicted, and for NNPCL to undergo the radical transformation it so desperately needs. The truth about the Port Harcourt Refinery is just the tip of the iceberg—beneath it lies a deeper crisis that demands urgent attention and decisive action.

This is a crossroads moment for Nigeria. The decisions made in the coming months will determine whether the country continues to stumble under the weight of past failures or rises to meet the challenges of the future. Kyari must go, and the truth about the Port Harcourt Refinery must be a turning point, not just for the oil sector, but for the nation as a whole.

King wrote this piece from Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Business

GTCO Launches “Take on Squad” Hackathon 3.0, Opens Call for Applications 

Published

on

GTCO Launches “Take on Squad” Hackathon 3.0, Opens Call for Applications 

 

 

Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc (“GTCO” or the “Group”) has announced the launch of “Take on Squad” Hackathon 3.0, reaffirming its commitment to fostering innovation, empowering talent, and supporting the development of technology-driven solutions that address real-world challenges across Africa.

Now in its third edition, the Hackathon brings together developers, designers and entrepreneurs across Nigeria in a collaborative environment to build practical solutions across key sectors including financial services, healthcare, commerce and digital inclusion. Under the theme “Smart Systems: The Intelligent Economy,” participants are challenged to design and build intelligent, data-driven solutions that transform how communities engage with money.

Applications are now open, and interested teams can find full guidelines and registration details on the official portal at https://squadco.com/hackathon.

Speaking on the initiative, Eduophon Japhet, Managing Director of HabariPay, stated: “Today’s dynamic, digitally driven world demands continuous innovation, which is shaping how economies grow, how businesses scale, and how societies evolve. Through “Take on Squad” Hackathon, we are deliberately investing in the ideas and talent that will define the future. Our objective is not simply to encourage innovation, but to enable its translation into scalable solutions that deliver real and measurable impact. This reflects GTCO’s role as a financial services platform that connects capital, capability, and creativity to drive sustainable progress.”

The social coding event remains a cornerstone of HabariPay’s mission to foster creativity and problem-solving among emerging tech talents. Competing teams will leverage Squad’s advanced APIs to create scalable digital tools that address everyday challenges faced by businesses and individuals.

Through initiatives such as this, GTCO continues to position itself at the intersection of finance, technology and enterprise, actively shaping the future of digital transformation in Africa.

 

About HabariPay

HabariPay Ltd is the fintech subsidiary of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc (GTCO), one of the largest financial services institutions in Africa with direct and indirect investments in a network of operating entities located in 10 countries across Africa and the United Kingdom.

Licensed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), our goal is to support SMEs, micro merchants, large corporations and other fintechs (Tech Stars) with the tools they need to thrive in an evolving digital economy and expand beyond their current market reach. HabariPay’s solutions include Squad, a full-scale digital payments toolkit to make in-person and online payments simpler, HabariPay Storefront, an e-commerce website to facilitate online purchases, Value-Added Services to help merchants access cost-effective and flexible airtime and data bundles to run their businesses, as well as a switching infrastructure that enables tech-focused businesses to optimise cost and make transactions more efficient.

HabariPay’s contributions to Accelerating Digital Acceptance in Africa have not gone unnoticed–it received Mastercard’s Innovative Mobile Payment Solution Award at TIA 2022 for its innovative payment solution, SquadPOS.

About Squad

Squad is a complete digital payments solution that is reliable, secure, and affordable, making receiving in-person and online payments simpler and convenient.

Thousands of merchants currently leverage Squad’s payment solutions for their daily business operations. Squad’s current products and service offerings include SquadPOS, Squad Payment Links, Squad Virtual Accounts, USSD, and E-Commerce Storefront.

Find out more at www.squadco.com.

Continue Reading

Business

Electric 8-Seater Tula Moto Keke Enters Nigerian Market, Targets Higher Operator Earnings

Published

on

Electric 8-Seater Tula Moto Keke Enters Nigerian Market, Targets Higher Operator Earnings

 

 

LAGOS — A new electric-powered tricycle with an expanded passenger capacity has been introduced into Nigeria’s urban transport sector, offering operators a potentially more profitable and eco-friendly alternative to conventional petrol-driven “keke.”

 

The newly launched 8-seater electric tricycle, now available in Lagos with plans for nationwide distribution, features a dual-row seating arrangement capable of accommodating up to eight passengers per trip—significantly higher than the standard three-passenger configuration common across the country.

 

 

Promoters of the innovation say the increased capacity is designed to boost daily earnings for operators, particularly amid persistent fluctuations in fuel prices. By running entirely on electric power, the vehicle eliminates dependence on petrol, reducing operating costs and shielding drivers from fuel price volatility.

 

 

According to the distributors, the tricycle is equipped with a durable battery system capable of covering extended distances on a single charge, making it suitable for commercial operations across high-traffic routes, residential estates, campuses, and marketplaces.

 

“The concept is straightforward—enable drivers to earn more while spending less,” a company representative stated. “With higher passenger capacity and zero fuel requirements, operators can maximise each trip without the burden of daily fuel expenses.”

 

Beyond its cost-saving potential, the electric keke is also said to require less maintenance than traditional models, offering additional long-term savings. Its quieter and smoother operation is expected to enhance passenger comfort and overall commuting experience.
Industry analysts note that the introduction of electric mobility solutions reflects a growing shift toward cleaner and more sustainable transportation alternatives in Nigeria, particularly in densely populated urban centres such as Lagos.

 

 

The distributors added that the product is currently available under a limited promotional offer, with delivery options across the country.

 

For inquiries and purchase: 📞 08153432071
📞 08035889103
Office Address:
📍 Plot 9, Block 113, Beulah Plaza,
Lekki–Epe Expressway,
Lekki Phase 1, Lagos

 

As transportation costs continue to rise and environmental concerns gain prominence, innovations like the electric 8-seater keke may signal an emerging transition toward more efficient and sustainable mobility solutions nationwide.

 

Electric 8-Seater Tula Moto Keke Enters Nigerian Market, Targets Higher Operator Earnings

Continue Reading

Business

A Pipeline, a Licence, and a Storm Brewing: Corruption allegations Draw global oil giant, Shell, Into Nigeria’s Reform Test

Published

on

*A Pipeline, a Licence, and a Storm Brewing: Corruption allegations Draw global oil giant, Shell, Into Nigeria’s Reform Test*

By Deji Johnson and Mustapha Bello

 

t begins with a pipeline that should have been completed by June 2026. It widens into a regulatory dispute. And it now risks becoming a defining test of Nigeria’s gas reforms under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

At the center is a stalled 80 kilometre gas pipeline from Sagamu to Ibadan, a project backed by over 100 million dollars in investment and built on a protected Gas Distribution Licence issued under the Petroleum Industry Act 2021. The licence granted NGML–NIPCO exclusive rights to distribute gas within Ibadan for 25years based on Nigeria’s Petroleum Industry Act.

On paper, the law is clear. On the ground, the situation is anything but.

For more than three months, construction has been halted following a stop work order issued by the Oyo State Government led by former Shell Contractor and engineer, Governor Seyi Makinde. No detailed public justification has been provided that aligns with existing federal approvals already secured for the project.

What might have remained a quiet regulatory disagreement has now escalated into something far more politically charged. How?

In recent remarks, Nigeria’s Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, who is of the same political party as Governor Seyi Makinde, made a pointed allegation that has since rippled across political and industry circles. He suggested that the Governor of Oyo State and Shell were in what could be described as an “unholy alliance.”

It is a serious claim. One that, if substantiated, would raise profound questions about the intersection of corporate influence, state level action, and federal law.

Neither Shell nor the Oyo State Government has publicly responded in detail to the allegation.

But the silence is now part of the story.

*THE SHELL QUESTION*

For Shell, this moment carries particular weight.

The company has operated in Nigeria for decades, building one of its most significant global portfolios in the Niger Delta. But that history is not without controversy. From corruption claims to environmental damage claims and community disputes amongst others, Shell has faced years of litigation and, in several high profile cases, adverse rulings tied to its operations in the region.

Those cases, many adjudicated in foreign courts, have shaped a negative reputation that continues to follow the company.

Now, a new question emerges.

Is Shell once again operating at the edge of Nigeria’s regulatory framework seeking to exert undue influence in circumventing Nigeria’s petroleum laws, or firmly within it?

Industry sources including a widely reported meeting between their representatives, Oyo State Government representatives and the newly appointed midstream and downstream chief executive, indicate that engagements involving Shell and the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority could enable the company to enter a gas distribution zone already licensed to another operator in breach of the PIA.

If true, the implications are immediate and far reaching.

A licence meant to protect investors and investments in Nigeria’s gas space ceases to be exclusive against the dictates of the guiding laws. A framework begins to look flexible, and a reform risks appearing reversible.

To many, it seems more than just a commercial dispute and is not just about one company versus another.

Nigeria is in the middle of an energy transition where gas is expected to play a central role in powering industries, stabilising electricity supply, and reducing reliance on expensive diesel. President Bola Tinubu has emerged as a global champion of using gas as a transition fuel in Nigeria and Africa whilst rolling out elaborate but clearly defined plans to achieve it. Yet gas availability remains inconsistent, constraining power generation and limiting industrial output.

Projects like the Sagamu to Ibadan pipeline are designed to close that gap. To halt such a project is to delay not just infrastructure, but impact. To undermine its legal basis is to question the system that enabled it and to introduce competing claims within the same licensed zone is to risk regulatory confusion at a time when clarity is most needed.

This is where the issue moves from commercial to national because at stake is not only an investment, but the credibility of the reform architecture itself.

*OYO STATE AND THE FEDERAL QUESTION*

The role of the Oyo State Government adds another layer of complexity.

Energy regulation in Nigeria, particularly in the gas sector, is governed by federal law. Yet implementation often intersects with state authority, creating spaces where jurisdiction can blur.

The stop work order issued on the pipeline has become the clearest manifestation of that tension. Was it a regulatory necessity?
A precautionary measure? Or, as alleged by Minister Wike, part of a broader alignment with external interests? Without transparency, speculation fills the vacuum and the regulator must avoid finding itself mired in such allegations.

*QUESTIONS THAT WILL NOT GO AWAY*

For Shell, the questions are now direct and unavoidable:

Is Shell, a global energy giant, seeking to operate within the Ibadan gas distribution zone already licensed to NGML–NIPCO?
What assurances, if any, has it received from regulators or state actors?
How does it reconcile such actions with the exclusivity provisions of the PIA?

For the regulator, NMDPRA:

Can a Gas Distribution Licence be effectively shared, diluted, or overridden after issuance? According to Nigerian laws, the answer is No.
What precedent does this set for Nigeria’s gas infrastructure market?

For the Oyo State Government:

On what legal grounds does the stop work order stand, given federal approvals already in place?
And how does this action align with national energy priorities or the state’s gas needs?

Nigeria has spent the last two years telling a new story to the world. A story of reform, of discipline, of a country ready to compete for global capital. And it has worked so far with stability returning to Nigeria’s economy and over $20bn of energy investments looking to enter the country in the short to midterm.

But reforms are not tested in policy papers. They are tested in moments like this.

Moments where law meets influence, investment meets interference and promise meets pressure.

For Shell, long mired in issues surrounding ethical operations in Nigeria, this is more than a business decision. It is a reputational crossroads.

For Nigeria, it is something even larger. Whether the country’s laws will hold when they are most challenged or Whether its reforms will stand when they are most inconvenient or even whether Nigeria’s energy investments future will be shaped by the rules of law, adherence to regulatory protections and provisions or by unethical and corrupt relationships.

Until those questions are answered clearly, publicly, and decisively, the pipeline in Ibadan will remain more than steel in the ground.

It will remain a symbol of a country still deciding which path it truly intends to follow. Nigeria must act quickly and decisively because the world is watching.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending