Politics
Probing Rivers Ugly Past* By Simon Peter
Published
11 months agoon

In examining the realm of governance and public resource management, one would agree that, accountability is a sacrosanct principle that serves as the bedrock of trust between the government and its citizens. However, in Rivers State, Nigeria, this fundamental principle appears to be under assault, as a plethora of allegations ranging from misconduct to malfeasance swirl around the former governor, Mr. Wike. The people of Rivers State have endured immense suffering under Wike’s leadership, and it is now incumbent upon Governor Sim Fubara to take swift and decisive action to investigate these egregious wrongdoings, hold perpetrators accountable, and deliver long-overdue justice to the victims. By doing so, Governor Fubara can begin to restore the trust that has been eroded and ensure that the principles of accountability and good governance are upheld in Rivers State.
The burning question on many minds is, “When will Governor Fubara probe Wike?”
The tenure of Mr. Wike as the governor of Rivers State was marked by a plethora of controversies and allegations of corruption, which have left an indelible stain on his legacy. One of the most egregious accusations leveled against him is the perpetration of inflated contracts, wherein contracts awarded during his tenure were allegedly grossly overpriced, resulting in a significant depletion of the state’s resources. If these allegations are substantiated, it would constitute a brazen betrayal of public trust, a flagrant violation of the principles of transparency and accountability, and a egregious abuse of power.
Moreover, Mr. Wike stands accused of leaving the state in a financially precarious situation, wherein the state’s debt profile skyrocketed under his leadership, plunging the state into a financial crisis. This has had a devastating impact on the state’s ability to fund critical infrastructure and social services, thereby exacerbating the suffering of the citizens of Rivers State and imperiling their welfare.
Among the multitude of allegations levied against Mr. Wike, the most heinous and egregious is the forceful expropriation of private property, a transgression that has left a trail of disillusionment and suffering in its wake. According to a report, the women of the Oginigba community in Rivers State, driven by desperation and a sense of injustice, staged a protest against the brazen seizure of their ancestral land, perpetrated by Mr. Wike through the instrumentality of the state government machinery. This egregious act, if proven, constitutes a flagrant violation of the rights of these women, a gross abuse of power, and a stark testament to Wike’s disdain for the rule of law and the fundamental rights of citizens. The forced takeover of private land, a blatant manifestation of Wike’s authoritarian proclivities, has left an indelible stain on his legacy, and its repercussions continue to reverberate, causing untold suffering and hardship for the affected individuals.
The evidence of Wike’s plundering of Rivers State’s wealth is manifest in his extensive portfolio of properties, including the Hypercity building in Ikoku, a multifaceted complex on Rumuomasi by old Aba road, which serves as a hub for esteemed brands like SHOPRITE, Cinema film House, Electronica, and others, as well as the Signature hotel in G.R.A, a former residence on William Jumbo street in Old GRA, Trans Amadi by BEWAC, AFP Plaza by Stadium, site for hospital by stadium road, and his current residence by Ada George. All these assets in Port Harcourt alone.
These few properties in Port Harcourt, traceable to Mr. Wike, are merely the tip of the iceberg. It is mind-boggling to contemplate the numerous properties scattered across various cities in Rivers State, not to mention the staggering hundreds of properties spread across different states in Nigeria, all allegedly linked to Mr. Wike’s name. The putrid stench of corruption wafting from his property acquisitions and takeovers demands a thorough investigation by the EFCC. Meanwhile, the people of Rivers State were languishing in excruciating poverty, while Wike was shamelessly amassing a vast empire of properties through illicit means, all at the expense of the state’s financial well-being.
In light of these grave allegations, it is absolutely essential that Governor Fubara takes swift and decisive action to investigate Mr. Wike’s tenure, ensuring a thorough and transparent probe that uncovers the truth behind the myriad accusations. The citizens of Rivers State have a rightful expectation to be informed about the veracity of these allegations, and to witness the delivery of justice and the recovery of misappropriated public resources, should these allegations be substantiated.
The consequences of Wike’s alleged malfeasance are nothing short of catastrophic, leaving the state mired in debt and stifling its development. The egregious inflation of contracts has resulted in a egregious depletion of the state’s resources, while the forceful takeover of private property has wreaked havoc on countless lives and livelihoods. Therefore, Governor Fubara must demonstrate unwavering resolve in reversing this damage, ensuring that those responsible are held accountable and brought to book, thereby restoring the trust and confidence of the citizens in the government.
Governor Fubara has a unique and auspicious opportunity to tangibly demonstrate his unwavering commitment to the principles of accountability, good governance, and the rule of law. By initiating a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation, he can ensure that Mr. Wike is held accountable for his alleged actions, thereby sending a powerful message that no individual is above the law. This probe, if conducted in a fair, transparent, and unbiased manner, will not only restore public trust and confidence in the government but also serve as a testament to Governor Fubara’s dedication to upholding the highest standards of governance. Furthermore, the investigation provides a chance to recover misappropriated funds and assets, which can then be reinvested in the development and progress of Rivers State.
However, it is crucial that this probe adheres to the highest standards of fairness, transparency, and due process, avoiding any semblance of a witch-hunt or political vendetta. Instead, it must be guided by an unwavering commitment to truth, justice, and the rule of law, thereby ensuring its credibility, legitimacy, and ultimate success.
The investigation into Wike’s alleged malfeasance is egregiously belated, and Governor Fubara’s prompt intervention is imperative to rectify this egregious oversight. The necessity for a thorough probe cannot be overstated, as it is indispensable for uncovering the truth, holding accountable those who have perpetrated wrongdoing, and restoring the public’s faith in the government. The people of Rivers State deserve a leadership that is transparent, accountable, and prioritizes their well-being and the development of the state, and Governor Fubara must demonstrate his commitment to these principles by initiating a comprehensive investigation into Wike’s tenure.
The gravity of the allegations against the former governor necessitates swift action, and the people of Rivers State demand nothing less than a thorough and transparent investigation that culminates in justice being served. By fulfilling this duty, Governor Fubara will not only be upholding the sacrosanct principle of accountability but also restoring the people’s trust in the government, thereby paving the way for a brighter future for Rivers State.
It is solely through the conduit of a meticulous and uncompromising investigation that the truth can be unearthed, justice can be administered, and the trajectory towards a future marked by prosperity and equity for the people of Rivers State can be firmly established. This imperative underscores the urgent need for a thorough probe into Mr. Wike’s tenure, rendering the present moment the most opportune and propitious time to initiate such an inquiry, thereby ensuring that the quest for accountability, truth, and justice is not perpetually relegated to the realm of the forgotten, but rather assumes its rightful position at the forefront of the state’s agenda.
Peter writing from Ikwere, Port Harcourt.
Related
Sahara weekly online is published by First Sahara weekly international. contact saharaweekly@yahoo.com

Politics
Speaker Obasa Calls for Unity as Court Declares Removal Illegal, Unconstitutional
Published
5 hours agoon
April 16, 2025
Speaker Obasa Calls for Unity as Court Declares Removal Illegal, Unconstitutional
Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. (Dr) Mudashiru Obasa has described the Lagos State High Court ruling, which declared his removal in January, “Illegal, unconstitutional, and null and void,” as a win for the Assembly as an institution.
“This is a victory for the Lagos House of Assembly as an institution and for our current and future members,” Obasa said in a statement by his media office.
He added that the court decision “reinforces the desire for us as members of the House to move ahead in unity and harmony and continue to work for the good of our people, our beloved Lagos State, and Nigeria.”
Speaker Obasa urged his colleagues to let bygones be bygones and continue working together in peace, harmony, and unity.
Justice Yetunde Pinheiro of the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja on Wednesday declared Obasa’s removal while on an official assignment to the United States of America in January as illegal, unconstitutional, and null and void.
Instructively, the court also nullified the proceedings and resolutions of the Assembly held on January 13, 2025, during which Obasa was ousted from office.
Obasa had filed a suit on February 12, 2025, through his counsel, Chief Afolabi Fashanu (SAN), challenging his removal because it was effected while the Assembly was on recess and he was outside the country. Obasa further argued that the House session during which he was removed was unlawfully convened and lacked proper authority or any formal delegation of power from the Speaker’s office. He named the House of Assembly and the Deputy Speaker, Mojisola Meranda, as defendants.
Obasa’s legal challenge was anchored on nine grounds, relying on provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Rules and Standing Orders of the Lagos State House of Assembly.
The court’s ruling effectively renders null and void all decisions taken during the January 13 session.
Related
Politics
Just in: China Erases Nigeria: A Diplomatic Earthquake or a Wake-Up Call?
Published
15 hours agoon
April 16, 2025
Just in: China Erases Nigeria:
A Diplomatic Earthquake or a Wake-Up Call?
By George Omagbemi Sylvester
Introduction: A Shocking Move from Beijing
In a move that has stunned the international community, the People’s Republic of China has taken an audacious and provocative diplomatic step:
Removed Nigeria from its official land map
Deactivated Nigerian presence on Chinese apps like WeChat and Weibo
Shut down the Nigerian Embassy in Beijing
Recalled its ambassador from Abuja
These actions are not just a geopolitical insult, they are a direct challenge to the legitimacy of Nigeria as a sovereign state.
Beijing’s Provocation: “Nigeria Has Expired”
According to the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry, Nigeria was a colonial construct designed to exist for only 100 years, referencing the 1914 British amalgamation of the northern and southern protectorates. Their chilling statement read:
“Nigeria’s continued existence has no historical or legal foundation. It is an expired project being manipulated by a corrupt elite.”
This unprecedented dismissal of a country’s legitimacy by a major power is deeply disturbing and diplomatically irresponsible.
Sovereignty Under Threat: A Dangerous Precedent
China’s actions violate several principles of international law, including:
The United Nations Charter (Article 2): Respect for the sovereignty of all member states
The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)
The African Union Constitutive Act (2000)
This move sends a dangerous message: that powerful nations can now erase weaker states based on selective historical interpretations.
Hypocrisy at Its Peak: China’s Double Standards
Beijing’s stance reeks of hypocrisy. China is itself a union of vastly different regions and ethnic groups:
Tibet and Xinjiang are held through military suppression.
Hong Kong is governed under the contentious “One Country, Two Systems.”
Taiwan, which China claims, is a fully functioning democratic entity.
How does a country that brutally suppresses secessionist sentiments now justify dismantling Nigeria for the same reasons it opposes in its own territories?
A Wake-Up Call for Nigeria’s Leadership
As painful as this is, Nigeria must reflect on why such an insult was possible in the first place. Over the last decade, the country has deteriorated in almost every global index:
Key Statistics (2015–2024):
Unemployment: Rose from 9.9% in 2015 to over 33.3% in 2023 (NBS)
Poverty: Over 133 million Nigerians live in multidimensional poverty (NBS, 2022)
Exchange rate: Naira devalued from ₦199/$1 in 2015 to over ₦1,600/$1 in 2024
Minimum wage: ₦30,000 ($18 monthly equivalent), yet unpaid in over 20 states
Debt to China: Over $4 billion owed, much of it collateralized (DMO, 2023)
Terrorism: Boko Haram, banditry, and IPOB violence still unchecked
China’s declaration may be diplomatically outrageous, but it exposes a fundamental truth: Nigeria has failed to act as a nation-state.
Weaponized Economics: China’s Neo-Colonial Grip China’s economic involvement in Africa has long raised concerns about debt diplomacy and economic colonization. Nigeria, like many African states, fell into Beijing’s web:
Railway projects: Over $2.5 billion funded by Chinese banks
Airport terminals: Chinese-built and financed with opaque terms
Sovereignty clauses: Some loan agreements allegedly waive immunity over critical assets in disputes
If China halts funding or demands repayments, Nigeria’s fragile economy could face collapse.
African Solidarity Needed Now
The silence from African governments has been deafening. If Nigeria, the largest economy and most populous country in Africa, can be humiliated this way, then no African state is safe.
The African Union must:
Convene an emergency summit
Demand a full apology and diplomatic reversal from China
Consider sanctions or diplomatic retaliations if China persists
This is not just a Nigerian issue, it is an African existential crisis.
The Deafening Silence of the West
Western nations, typically vocal about human rights and sovereignty, have responded with vague platitudes. The UK—Nigeria’s former colonizer has said nothing meaningful. The US State Department simply urged “calm.”
This lack of global outcry reflects how far Nigeria has fallen in international relevance. A once-powerful voice in the Non-Aligned Movement, a key peacekeeping contributor, and regional stabilizer is now seen as a failed state.
The Identity Crisis: Who Is a Nigerian?
Beijing’s criticism touches a nerve: Nigeria’s identity crisis.
Over 250 ethnic groups
Three major religions with deep divisions.
Electoral politics driven by tribalism and zoning, not competence.
Secessionist agitations in the South East (IPOB), South West (Yoruba Nation), and Niger Delta
More than a century after amalgamation, there is still no unifying national vision. If China’s insult triggers a much-needed national debate, it could be a blessing in disguise.
From Humiliation to Rebirth
China’s erasure of Nigeria from its map and communication networks is outrageous, unlawful, and racist. But it is also a moment of reckoning.
*Nigeria must now:*
Reclaim its dignity through good governance
Rebuild national unity with a people-first constitution
Diversify its economy to reduce dependence on exploitative powers
Assert itself diplomatically as Africa’s true leader
This is not the end, it could be the beginning of Nigeria’s long-overdue transformation.
Related
Politics
A Democracy in Shackles: How APC’s Tyranny Redefines Governance in Nigeria
Published
16 hours agoon
April 16, 2025
A Democracy in Shackles: How APC’s Tyranny Redefines Governance in Nigeria
By George Omagbemi Sylvester
In a move that reeks of insecurity and political cowardice, a prominent opposition figure was recently denied access to a Nigerian state governed by the All Progressives Congress (APC). It was an act so ridiculous, so blatantly undemocratic, that it should outrage every Nigerian who still believes in the sanctity of our constitution. Yet in the twisted world of Nigerian politics under APC rule, such abuses of power are now routine, laughed off by party loyalists and excused by compromised institutions.
This incident, though outrageous, is nothing new. It is just the latest entry in the growing catalogue of authoritarianism that defines APC’s version of democracy. While it may serve as a grim masterclass for future administrations on how to stifle dissent and weaponize state power, it also marks a dangerous shift away from democratic norms and toward full-blown tyranny.
Constitutional Rights Under Siege
Section 41(1) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution is clear: “Every citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout Nigeria and to reside in any part thereof.” Denying any Nigerian, let alone a public figure with national relevance, the right to enter any state is not only unconstitutional, it is criminal. When a government starts deciding who can and cannot enter parts of the country based on political affiliation, that government is no longer democratic. It is dictatorial.
It is important to remember that political opposition is not a crime. It is a necessary pillar of democracy. The APC’s action is not governance, it is an attempt to choke the very air democracy breathes.
A Pattern of Repression
This is far from an isolated event. Since the APC took power in 2015, Nigeria has witnessed an unprecedented erosion of democratic values. The government has systematically turned law enforcement agencies into tools of oppression. Peaceful protesters are arrested. Opposition campaigns are blocked. Media outlets are intimidated. And now, opposition leaders are being barred from entire states.
In 2018, the Department of State Services (DSS) infamously barricaded the National Assembly, attempting to forcefully change legislative leadership in broad daylight. That same year, the police under the command of the APC-led executive blocked Senate President Bukola Saraki’s convoy. These events were not just violations of individual rights, they were direct attacks on the democratic institution of checks and balances.
Freedom House, the globally respected democracy watchdog, classified Nigeria as “Partly Free” in its 2023 report, citing increased government intimidation of journalists, political opposition, and civil society. Transparency International has consistently ranked Nigeria poorly in corruption perception indices, highlighting the decay of both moral and institutional integrity under APC rule.
Weaponizing Security Forces
The selective use of security forces by APC governors and the presidency has become a dangerous norm. Instead of ensuring public safety and upholding the rule of law, police and military personnel are deployed to serve narrow political interests. During elections, they harass voters and opposition agents. During rallies, they intimidate citizens exercising their constitutional rights.
The recent blockade of an opposition figure’s convoy from entering a state controlled by the APC is yet another abuse in a long line of infractions. This is state-sponsored lawlessness masquerading as governance. What we are witnessing is not just the death of democracy, but it is the burial of accountability.
APC’s Hypocrisy and Double Standards
Perhaps the most galling aspect of this unfolding drama is APC’s shameless hypocrisy. When in opposition, APC politicians cried foul at the slightest provocation. They championed free speech, free movement, and fair elections. Yet now, in power, they have become the very monsters they once condemned.
APC accuses opposition parties of inciting unrest, but tolerates its own thugs terrorizing political opponents. It claims to uphold rule of law, yet governs through executive orders, illegal detentions, and manipulated court judgments. The irony is both tragic and revolting.
Even APC’s internal party structure is a caricature of democracy. Candidates are imposed, primaries are rigged, and dissent is criminalized. It is no wonder that a party so allergic to internal democracy would extend its tyranny to national governance.
A Dangerous Precedent
Let it be clear: what APC has done sets a precedent that should terrify every Nigerian. If one political party can deny access to a state today, what stops another from declaring entire regions as “off-limits” tomorrow? Today it’s an opposition figure; tomorrow it could be a journalist, a protester, a community leader, or even an ordinary citizen with a dissenting voice.
The implications are massive. It undermines national unity. It fosters regional tension. It invites violence. Most dangerously, it signals that political might, not the constitution, now governs Nigeria.
Compromised Institutions, Complicit Silence
Where are the institutions that should speak up? Where is the Nigerian Human Rights Commission? Where is INEC? Where is the National Assembly? Where are the religious leaders, the civil society organizations, the Nobel laureates and public intellectuals?
Their silence is deafening, and dangerous. In democratic societies, institutions are designed to act as guardrails against tyranny. But Nigeria’s have been captured, bullied, or bought. The judiciary, which should be the last line of defense, often bows to political pressure. The legislature acts like an extension of the executive, not a check on it.
When all arms of government fail to stand for justice, the collapse of democracy becomes not just possible, but inevitable.
Democracy Must Be Defended
What the APC is doing is not democracy. It is autocracy painted in green and white. And it must be rejected by all well-meaning Nigerians.
The people must rise, not with violence, but with voices, votes, and vigilance. Civil society must mobilize. The press must expose. International observers must take note. The coming elections must be more than a contest of ballots and they must be a referendum on tyranny.
The opposition must also rise above fear. They must confront the APC not just with outrage, but with strategy, solidarity, and strength. If the democratic space continues to shrink unchecked, Nigeria risks descending into the abyss of fascism.
In conclusion: Defining Our Democracy
If the APC insists on defining its own version of democracy; one built on exclusion, suppression, and brute force, then the Nigerian people must define a democracy that includes every voice, protects every right, and defends every citizen.
Let no one be deceived: this is not about a single state, a single politician, or a single party. It is about the soul of a nation. The battle for Nigeria’s democracy will not be won in silence or cynicism. It will be won by citizens who say enough is enough…who reject fear and demand freedom.
History will not be kind to the APC if it continues down this dark path. And neither will the people, who, when truly awakened, have the power to end any regime that forgets who truly holds sovereignty in a democracy: the people.
Sylvester is a distinguished political and prolific writer. He writes from Johannesburg
Related
Trending
-
Business6 months ago
Comprehensive Media Audit Shows Flutterwave, MTN Nigeria, and Bolt Outpacing Competitors in Media Engagement
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months ago
How Deji Adeyanju Secured The Release Of Speed Darlington
-
Politics6 months ago
My best is yet to come’ As Ambassador Adesina ‘Lanre Ogunsola affirmed at the APC APEX body, Obafemi Owode Local Government
-
Entertainment4 months ago
Aliu Gafar delivers stellar performance as Esusu in Femi Adebayo’s Seven Doors