Nigeria Is SinkingāOr Has Already SankāBecause It Has Never Had a True Natural Activist as President
*By George Omagbemi Sylvester*
Since independence (1960) till date, Nigeria has been governed by a long list of military rulers turned democrats, political opportunists, and power brokers driven more by ambition than by activism. The country is not just sinking; many would argue it has already sank. A nation so richly blessed with human and natural resources, yet so tragically mismanaged, has one fundamental and recurring flaw: Nigeria has never been led by a true, passionate, people-driven, natural activist as President. Not once. And this absence of authentic patriotic activism at the helm of affairs is the root cause of Nigeriaās perpetual regression.

Who is a Natural Activist?
A natural activist is not a professional politician who discovered āthe peopleā after tasting the perks of power.
A natural activist is someone whose life is built around advocacy for justice, equity, development, and the empowerment of the masses. Itās someone who has consistently sacrificed personal comfort for the good of the collective, even before entering political office.
Let us think of the likes of Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso, Patrice Lumumba of Congo, or Nelson Mandela of South Africaāleaders who governed with the people in mind because their lives had already been a protest against injustice.

Nigeriaās Political Landscape: Bereft of Natural Activists From the first republic to the current dispensation, Nigeria has recycled a class of rulers disconnected from the pulse of the people.
While the names may changeāObasanjo, Buhari, Jonathan, YarāAdua, Tinubuāthe blueprint remains the same: politicking for personal gain, ethnic consolidation of power, and absolute disregard for the poor. Let us break it down.
ā **Obasanjo (1976ā79, 1999ā2007)**: A former military general who returned as a ādemocrat,ā Obasanjoās second coming was marred by privatization scandals, excessive debt accumulation, and the infamous third-term agenda. Though praised for some macroeconomic stability, his administration hardly addressed the root causes of poverty and corruption. He was more of a power tactician than a peopleās advocate.
ā **YarāAdua (2007ā2010)**: A gentleman by all standards, yet not a natural activist. His brief tenure showed flashes of reform, but his political ascendancy was rooted in elite arrangements, not mass movement or public-driven ideals.
ā **Goodluck Jonathan (2010ā2015)**: A man who rose from a humble background, yesābut not an activist. His failure to confront corruption, his helplessness during the Boko Haram insurgency, and his excessive tolerance of inefficiency revealed a man unprepared to challenge the rot of the system he inherited.
ā **Muhammadu Buhari (1983ā1985, 2015ā2023)**: Widely promoted as a man of integrity, Buhariās civilian tenure will go down as one of the most economically devastating and socially polarizing in Nigerian history. Inflation soared, naira collapsed, insecurity worsened, and public institutions eroded under his watch. Activism was never his natureādiscipline perhaps, but not a people-centered agenda.
ā **Bola Ahmed Tinubu (2023āpresent)**: A political godfather and master strategist, Tinubuās presidency has been about consolidation of political debts and patronage, not grassroots reform. Nigerians continue to suffer under the yoke of fuel subsidy removal without palliative alternatives, with worsening inflation, rising unemployment, and a sense of national directionlessness.
Why Activism Matters in Leadership Activism births empathy.
A true activist understands the hunger of the market woman, the hopelessness of the unemployed graduate, and the despair of the displaced family in the northeast. Activists donāt need a think tank to tell them what Nigerians needāthey have lived it, fought for it, and been jailed for it. That moral conviction is missing in Nigeriaās leadership class. Instead, what we have are career politicians, most of whom see the state as a cash cow.
PDP: The Best Democratic Structure Nigeria Has Ever Had Despite its flaws and internal contradictions, the **Peopleās Democratic Party (PDP)** remains the best political structure Nigeria has ever produced in the democratic era. Its national outlook, internal zoning principles, commitment to electoral processes (especially under INEC leadership like Prof. Attahiru Jegaās during Jonathanās era), and relatively peaceful transfers of power demonstrate a level of maturity the APC has never possessed. PDP is not perfect. It has harbored corrupt elements and mismanaged certain opportunities. But it has shown more commitment to democratic ideals than the APC, which has demonstrated autocratic tendencies, media repression, and election manipulation. Under PDP, Nigeria experienced her longest stretch of uninterrupted democracy (1999ā2015), enjoyed debt relief, and implemented vital reforms in telecommunications, banking, and agriculture. Even under Goodluck Jonathanāoften criticized for his slow paceāthe country experienced freedom of speech, judicial independence, and a peaceful concession of defeat in the 2015 election. This singular act elevated Nigeriaās democratic image worldwide.
The Cost of Not Having an Activist-President
Hereās what Nigeria has suffered by not having a natural activist in Aso Rock:
1. **Corruption as Culture**: With no president ready to risk popularity for reform, corruption has become institutionalized. From inflated contracts to oil theft, leaders often turn a blind eye.
2. **Insecurity**: A true activist understands that every Nigerian life mattersāChristian or Muslim, Hausa or Igbo, rich or poor. Instead, our leaders respond to crises with committees and condolence tweets.
3. **Brain Drain**: The mass emigration of young Nigerians (āJapaā) is a direct consequence of failed leadership. Youths no longer see a future in a country where hard work is not rewarded and where dreams are constantly suffocated.
4. **Economic Collapse**: With inflation at record highs, unemployment skyrocketing, and the naira in freefall, one wonders how long Nigeria can survive. An activist-president would prioritize local industry, cut government waste, and protect the poorānot travel the world seeking loans while public universities are closed for months.
5. **Loss of National Identity**: Tribalism, religious bigotry, and ethnic chauvinism have replaced national unity. A true activist leader would rise above ethnic sentiments and unite the nation with a common purpose.
What Nigeria Needs Nigeria doesnāt need another politician in agbada with empty campaign slogans. It needs a leader who feels the pain of the peopleādeeply and personally. Someone who has *fought* for the people, not just *spoken* to them. We need an activist-president who is not afraid to call out the elite, challenge the status quo, and lead reforms that may upset the powerful but uplift the powerless. Until then, Nigeria will continue to oscillate between failure and disaster. We need a president who sees Aso Rock not as a throne of privilege but a platform for purposeful struggle
Nigeria is where it is todayāsinking, or perhaps already submergedābecause its leaders have lacked the authenticity, empathy, and passion that only natural activists possess.
No nation can rise above the quality of its leadership. Weāve had generals, technocrats, politicians, and businessmen. What we havenāt had is an activistāsomeone who fights for the people before, during, and after power.
It is time for Nigerians to rethink leadership.
We must demand more than polished grammar and political propaganda.
We must demand passion, sacrifice, and an unwavering commitment to justice.
Only then can we begin to pull this nation from the depths of despair.
Until such a leader emerges, we may continue to shout āUp NEPAā as if itās a privilege to have light in 2025. And that, fellow Nigerians, is the greatest embarrassment of all. ā