Connect with us

society

Sex scandal: Court vindicates AAU Don

Published

on

A Magistrate court sitting at Ekpoma, Esan West Local Government Area in Edo state, has jailed Judith Ivie Okosun and Juliet Obehi Okosun who are both graduates of the state-owned Ambrose Alli University (AAU).

Chief Magistrate Maltina Iluobe in charge sheet No: MEK/18C/2012, committed Juliet Obehi Okosun to two years imprisonment for unlawful detention and indecent assault on the University don.

The court, also Judith Ivie Okosun was also convicted for one year jail term for unlawful detention of the plaintiff in connection with sexual harassment scandal, which precipitated to the dismissal of Dr. Peter Otubu, lecturer in the Department of Electrical and Electronic of the Institution over seven years ago.

The first and second accused persons were convicted with N20, 000 an option of fine on count 4, which bothers on indecent assault, while her sister, Juliet Obehi Okosun (Second accused person) was found guilty on count 8, for unlawful detention of the University don.

The court recalled that Juliet Obehi Okosun (second accused person) had admitted in her evidence before the court that she had the key to the apartment where (first accused person), Judith Ivie Okosun, unlawfully assaulted Dr. Otubu who was held hostage and stripped naked at their one room apartment in a private female hostel near the University on 17th July 2010.
In count 8, the court, ruled that the failure of Juliet Obehi Okosun to open the door of their living room and release Dr. Otubu who was made to raise the sum of N100, 000. 00 (One Hundred Naira) cheque in favour of Judith Ivie Okosun for the inhuman treatment against Dr. Peter Otubu under the same circumstance.

The court specifically established that in the recorded video clips which was also posted in the internet by one Oziengbe, now at large, that the second accused person had told court that she was in possession of the key to their apartment where Dr. Peter Otubu was held, making her liable for conviction with an option of fine of N30, 000 for unlawful detention.

Chief Magistrate Maltina Iluobe, however, discharged and acquitted Judith Ivie Okosun (24) and Juliet Obehi Okosun (22) who were both undergraduate students at AAU at the time the charged to court on count 1, 5, and 6 which bothers on conspiracy and stealing and frivolous petition against Dr. Peter Otubu, following the failure or the prosecution to prove to the court.

It also discharged and acquitted the 3rd to 7th accused persons, Esther Ogbeide (21), Samson Ogbeide (32), Igbudu Samuel (42), Ojeabulu Eghosa Clement (37) and Aruya Ohis Williams (24) for lack of substantial evidence.
The court revealed that the failure of Mobile Telecommunications Network (MTN) to provide calls log of conversations between the first Principal Witness (Dr. Peter Iluobe) and some of the accused persons as required by the prosecution to prove his case.

The court particularly frowned at Dr. Peter Otubu’s conduct who it said “suffered from the sins of immorality to have gone to the room of her student which resulted in the show of shame”, humiliation and torture which left his career in ruins.

“This court is of the view that there is a very strong conspiracy and set up against the Dr. Peter Otubu, even though the defense Counsel had submitted before the court that suspicion does not amount to conspiracy,

The court also held that “throughout the length and breadth of the case, there is a thread which runs through criminal procedure of the case against the accused persons.

“Therefore, I hold that count 1, has not been proved as required by law.
“For count 2, the the first and second accused persons had testified that, the allegations were communicated to the school authorities about the show of shame.

“I believe them in this because judging from the position of the the Principal Witness (PW1) and nthe first accused person, the whole truth was found and doctored, such situation is highly embarrassing to him as a lecturer, his family and the University Community”, the court said.
The court also confirmed that the Institution had launched an internal preliminary investigation into sexual harassment saga between Judith Ivie Okosun and Dr. Otubu who was her elective course of the lecturer in exchange to lay with her which may not have prevented her from graduating except her carryover courses had piled.

Responding, Counsel to the defendants, Mr. Olayowola Afolabi, concurred with the judgement on sexual promiscuity of PW1 as “a show of shame”.

But he pleaded with the court for clemency for the convicted persons on ground that they were first offenders, stressing that the second convict is a nursing mother.

“The first accused person my lord, is about to get married. I had to plead with the husband to allow her to come to court.

“My lord, they first and second accused persons were first offenders.

According to him, “my lord also has the option to caution the convicts in view of the circumstances. My lord is a woman who knows where the shoe is punching us.
“So my lord, I am pleading. Literally, my lord, I am on my knees.

“It is a show of shame for the lecturer to come to the house of his student”.

Haven held to submission of Mr. Olayowola Afolabi, Counsel to the defendants, the court, handed down an option of fine to the first and second accused persons in lieu of imprisonment.

Highly elated Dr. Peter Otubu, said the judgement has vindicated him, clarifying however that  he was not sacked but dismissed by management of AAU to enable him prove his innocence.
“I am okay. The Principal suspect, Ivie Okosun and her sister, Juliet Obehi Okosun have been jailed. Whether they were given an option of fine or not.

  “To correct the erroneous impression, I was never dismissed from AAU, my appointment was terminated based on the video that was posted on the Internet”, he said.

Sahara weekly online is published by First Sahara weekly international. contact saharaweekly@yahoo.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

society

URGENT APPEAL FOR HELP: Saving Mrs. Kate Adeosun’s Life

Published

on

URGENT APPEAL FOR HELP: Saving Mrs. Kate Adeosun’s Life

Mrs. Kate Adeosun, a devoted wife and mother of 43 years, has been bravely battling chronic kidney disease for two years. Despite undergoing dialysis twice weekly, her condition has worsened, and her doctors now recommend an urgent kidney transplant to save her life.

*The Cost:* Approximately N40 million is required for the transplant procedure.

*We Need Your Help:* We humbly appeal to your kindness and generosity to support Mrs. Adeosun’s life-saving surgery. Your donation, big or small, can make a significant difference.

*Donation Details:*

Account Name: Kate Adeosun
Bank: Zenith Bank
Account Number: 2428903022

*Your Support:* Will bring hope and relief to Mrs. Adeosun and her family. May God bless you abundantly for your kindness and generosity.

Let’s come together to save a life! 💕

Continue Reading

society

Africa’s Liberation: Echoes of Mugabe and Gaddafi in the Struggle for True Independence

Published

on

Africa’s Liberation: Echoes of Mugabe and Gaddafi in the Struggle for True Independence

By George O. Sylvester

When we speak of Africa’s liberation, it’s tempting to confine it to the end of colonial rule, the departure of European governors and the hoisting of new national flags. To revolutionary thinkers like Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, true liberation was never just political. It was and remains a matter of economic sovereignty, cultural pride and continental unity.

Both men were controversial, even authoritarian. Yet history cannot erase the ideological fire they ignited across Africa. Their speeches, their actions however imperfect continue to provoke debate, inspire movements and remind us that the promise of African freedom is far from fulfilled.

The Colonial Inheritance
European colonization was not merely a conquest of land; it was a calculated dismembering of identity. From the 1884 Berlin Conference to the post-World War II independence movements, colonial powers carved up Africa with little regard for indigenous cultures or long-term development. They imposed foreign languages, looted resources and left behind borders that would later become fault lines of ethnic and political conflict.

By the 1960s, most African nations had achieved formal independence. But beneath the surface, colonial structures remained intact. Economies were still dependent on raw material exports. Local industries were weak or non-existent. Debt became a new mechanism of control. And Western governments and corporations continued to wield disproportionate influence.

It was in this neo-colonial reality that Mugabe and Gaddafi emerged not just as national leaders, but as ideologues of African renaissance.

Mugabe: “The Land is Ours”
Robert Mugabe led Zimbabwe to independence in 1980 after a bloody guerrilla war against Ian Smith’s white minority regime in what was then Southern Rhodesia. An eloquent intellectual and a veteran freedom fighter, Mugabe initially championed reconciliation and development. But by the early 2000s, his focus shifted toward radical land reform.

His justification was unapologetic:

“The land is ours. It is not European. And we have taken it. We have given it to the rightful people of Zimbabwe.”

Mugabe saw the ownership of land as central to the liberation struggle. For decades, white settlers had monopolized Zimbabwe’s most fertile land, while Black Africans remained tenants in their own country. The decision to expropriate white-owned farms, often without compensation, was seen by the West as a violation of property rights. For Mugabe, it was a long-overdue act of justice.

While critics blame these policies for Zimbabwe’s economic collapse and hyperinflation, Mugabe’s defenders argue that he did what few African leaders dared to do, challenge the post-colonial order and reclaim national resources.

As he once stated:

“We are not Europeans. We have not asked for any inch of Europe. So let Europe leave us alone.”

To Mugabe, African independence meant nothing without control over land and resources. His legacy is a warning and a lesson: economic liberation cannot be separated from political freedom.

Gaddafi: “African Unity is the Only Solution”
While Mugabe fought colonial remnants at home, Muammar Gaddafi envisioned a continent freed through unification. After seizing power in Libya in 1969, Gaddafi used his country’s oil wealth to pursue a Pan-African dream. He funded liberation movements across the continent, supported the African National Congress during apartheid and pushed tirelessly for a United States of Africa.

He famously said:

“The Black race shall prevail throughout the world, because it is the most oppressed and dispossessed. Our unity is our weapon.”

Gaddafi advocated for a single African government, army, currency and passport. He argued that only a unified Africa could resist foreign manipulation and control its own destiny. At the African Union summit in 2009, he thundered:

“Africa must unite now or perish. The time for petty nationalism is over. We must speak with one voice to protect our interests.”

Under his leadership, Libya became one of the most developed countries in Africa with free healthcare, free education and the highest Human Development Index on the continent. He proposed an African central bank and monetary fund as alternatives to the IMF and World Bank, which he viewed as instruments of Western neocolonialism.

But Gaddafi’s ambitions made him enemies. His death in 2011 following a NATO bombing campaign and a Western-backed uprising was a stark reminder of how foreign powers still shape Africa’s destiny. Before his fall, he warned African leaders:

“They will create chaos, they will divide you and you will cry for the return of Gaddafi.”

Today, Libya is a fractured state, a shadow of the once ambitious vision he pursued.

Beyond Borders and Ballots
Mugabe and Gaddafi were far from perfect. Mugabe grew increasingly autocratic, suppressing dissent and clinging to power well into old age. Gaddafi ruled Libya with an iron grip, brooking no opposition and building a cult of personality. Their authoritarianism deserves scrutiny.

Yet their core message endures: Africa is not truly free.

Not when multinational corporations extract billions from African soil while local communities remain impoverished.
Not when international lenders dictate economic policies that prioritize debt repayment over development.
Not when culture, history, and identity are diluted by imported values and education systems.

Their critique of neocolonialism remains disturbingly relevant. And their call for African unity, economic Self-determination and cultural revival has yet to be fully answered.

Today’s Betrayal of Revolutionary Ideals
In the 21st century, the ideological clarity of Mugabe and Gaddafi has been replaced by a politics of compromise and dependence. African leaders host elaborate investment forums for former colonial powers, sign away mineral rights to foreign corporations, and implement IMF-led austerity programs.

China’s growing influence in Africa is lauded as an alternative to Western control. Yet, many of these “partnerships” mirror colonial dynamics, resources flow out, while debt and dependency grow.

Meanwhile, Africa’s youth are restless. Unemployment, poverty and lack of opportunity drive many to seek life elsewhere. Migration has become a silent vote of no confidence in African governments.

As Mugabe once observed:

“Africa is not poor. It is just poorly managed.”

The Road Ahead: Real Liberation
Africa’s liberation remains a work in progress. The continent must return to the foundational truths expressed, however imperfectly; by Mugabe and Gaddafi.

1. Economic Sovereignty: African nations must control and process their own resources. Dependency on raw exports and foreign capital is unsustainable.

2. Pan-African Unity: Regional integration must move from rhetoric to reality. Shared infrastructure, trade, currency, and defense mechanisms are vital.

3. Cultural Renaissance: The decolonization of the African mind must accompany the decolonization of the economy. Language, history, and values matter.

4. Youth Empowerment: Africa’s future lies in its youth. Education, entrepreneurship, and civic leadership must be prioritized.

As Gaddafi declared:

“You may kill me, but my ideas will not die.”

Indeed, they have not. The dream of a free, united, and dignified Africa is still alive waiting for bold, visionary leadership to carry it forward. The torch lit by Mugabe and Gaddafi now lies in the hands of a new generation.

Will they pick it up?

 

Africa’s Liberation: Echoes of Mugabe and Gaddafi in the Struggle for True Independence
By George O. Sylvester

Continue Reading

society

Prophecy Fulfilled: Wiseman Daniel’s 2025 Warning Comes to Life as Burkina Faso Foils Coup Plot (video)

Published

on

Prophecy Fulfilled: Wiseman Daniel's 2025 Warning Comes to Life as Burkina Faso Foils Coup Plot (video)

Prophecy Fulfilled: Wiseman Daniel’s 2025 Warning Comes to Life as Burkina Faso Foils Coup Plot (video)

 

In what many believers are calling a divine confirmation, recent political developments in Burkina Faso have been seen as a direct fulfillment of a prophecy issued earlier this year by renowned Nigerian prophet, Wiseman Daniel, founder of Elohim Ministry.

In his prophetic address titled “The Mind of God for the Year 2025”, Wiseman Daniel warned of a covert plot being hatched by a European power—specifically France—against a small but rising African nation striving for self-sufficiency. He cautioned that any attempt to destabilize this nation would have dire consequences for the foreign powers involved, as the country had already gained international sympathy and would be fiercely defended by allies.

Prophecy Fulfilled: Wiseman Daniel's 2025 Warning Comes to Life as Burkina Faso Foils Coup Plot (video)

Barely months later, the military government of Burkina Faso announced it had thwarted a major plot to overthrow junta leader Capt Ibrahim Traoré. Security Minister Mahamadou Sana disclosed that the coup was orchestrated by a network of current and former soldiers, with ties to terrorist leaders and alleged foreign support from neighbouring Ivory Coast. The conspirators had planned to storm the presidential palace and plunge the country into chaos under the guise of international intervention.

“This was more than a local insurrection,” said Sana in a televised address. “The goal was to disrupt our sovereignty and place the country under external control.”

In the aftermath, citizens of Burkina Faso poured into the streets, rallying in support of their leader and warning both France and the United States to abandon any hidden agendas against their nation. Placards bearing slogans like “Hands Off Our President” and “Africa Must Stand Together” highlighted the deepening patriotic fervour and suspicion of Western interference.

Observers are now linking these events to Wiseman Daniel’s prophecy. He had stated:

“A small African country will rise out of darkness into light. But France must not execute her hidden plan. The consequences will be too great. This country has the eyes of the world on it—and will be backed by unexpected forces.”

Since Capt Traoré seized power in 2022 amidst rising militant violence, Burkina Faso has taken bold steps towards rejecting foreign military presence and asserting its independence. The junta’s posture has drawn both criticism and admiration, but the recent thwarted coup and the citizens’ overwhelming support appear to echo the prophetic tone of Wiseman Daniel’s warning.

While some may view these developments through a purely political lens, others in the spiritual community see it as a clear sign of divine insight and intervention.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending