Business
Experts Ponder on the Proposed Shipping Regulatory Bill
*Experts Ponder on the Proposed Shipping Regulatory Bill
The Nigerian Shipping and Port Economic Regulatory Agency bill has undergone multiple revisions, with the 2024 iteration duplicating the powers and functions of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) and other Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) under the Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy. This proposed shipping regulatory bill has sparked intense debate and discussion among stakeholders in the maritime industry, with concerns raised regarding potential increases in governance costs. Nevertheless, numerous experts believe that a regulatory framework is essential for the industry’s growth and development.
In a public hearing that was held this year, stakeholders convened to share their perspectives on the bill, and the consensus was clear: the Shippers’ Regulatory Bill is the preferred option. The crux of the debate centers on whether the proposed bill will usher in a new era of streamlined governance and enhanced regulatory oversight or burden shippers with exorbitant costs. Proponents of the bill argue that it represents a long-overdue modernization of the regulatory framework, designed to address the evolving needs of the shipping industry in response to rapid global trade changes and technological advancements.
One of the bill’s sponsors and Chairman of the House Committee on Shipping Services and Related Matters, Hon. Abdussamad Dasuki, quoting a gazette, said the Nigerian Shippers’ Council was made the port economic regulator in 2015 by the Federal Government, a status that needed to be formalized through legislation. “The Federal Government noted that the objective of the regulation is to create an effective regulatory regime for the Nigerian ports after the concession of the ports. Port does not mean the Nigerian Ports Authority alone. It also means all the stakeholders in the ports, for the control of tariffs, rates, charges, and other related economic services,” Dasuki.
Experts from various sectors of the maritime industry presented their views on why they believe the bill holds the key to a more efficient and competitive shipping landscape. A prevailing argument put forth by stakeholders is the need for a robust regulatory framework that can adapt to the rapid changes in global trade and technological advancements. However, a key concern raised by stakeholders is the potential for the bill to establish a new agency with overlapping responsibilities with existing bodies, leading to inefficiencies and increased government spending. Furthermore, stakeholders point out that the bill appears to contradict the Oronsaye Report, a government-commissioned study that recommended consolidating agencies to streamline governance, thereby minimizing bureaucratic redundancy and enhancing the overall efficiency of regulatory oversight.
According to industry experts present at the public hearing, the proposed bill presents a strategic opportunity to harmonize regulatory standards and practices, thereby fostering a more cohesive and responsive ecosystem for shippers. This harmonization, they emphasize, will not only enhance operational efficiency and resilience in the face of global economic fluctuations but also attract investment, promote economic growth, and ensure safety, security, and efficiency.
Dr. Okonji, a renowned maritime expert, opined, “The industry has long awaited a regulatory framework, which will boost investment, economic growth, and overall development by ensuring safety, security, and efficiency.” Mr. Adekola, another expert, added, “The Shippers’ Council will establish a level playing field, curtail unfair practices, and safeguard the interests of shippers, leading to a more equitable and competitive industry.”
Mrs. Uche, a shipowner, expressed her support for the bill, stating, “Regulation will standardize operations, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance Nigeria’s maritime industry reputation globally, making it more competitive and attractive to investors.” Mr. Hassan, a representative of the Nigerian Shippers’ Council, emphasized the need for a regulatory framework that aligns with international best practices, dispelling rumors of contradictions with the presidential policy. Instead, he affirmed that the bill complements the policy, providing a framework for economic regulation that contributes to the sector’s overall development and efficiency.
Proponents of the bill also highlighted its potential to improve transparency and accountability, mitigating risks and enhancing trust in the regulatory process. They argued that the bill’s provisions for clearer guidelines and oversight mechanisms are essential for promoting fair competition and safeguarding shippers’ interests in a rapidly evolving global market. By fostering a more transparent and accountable regulatory environment, the bill aims to protect shippers’ interests, promote fair competition, and enhance the overall efficiency of the maritime industry.
Moreover, the proposed bill has garnered support from experts who emphasize the necessity of harmonizing regulatory frameworks with international best practices. They argue that the bill’s provisions for greater alignment with global standards will enhance the industry’s reputation on the international stage, potentially leading to new opportunities for collaboration and trade partnerships.
It is also noteworthy to state that, various groups and organizations believe that it is imperative for Nigeria to end the dominance of critical sectors by powerful individuals hiding behind organizations to block reforms necessary to align the country with global best practices. They urge the House of Representatives to remain resolute and not be swayed by veiled blackmail and threats disguised as expert opinions during the consideration of this strategic bill.
After a thorough and meticulous analysis of the bill’s provisions, Dr. Ahmed, a renowned expert in the field, was in complete concurrence with the prevailing sentiment, and in his esteemed opinion, he articulated the following: “The overwhelming consensus among experts and stakeholders is that the bill will effectively tap into the Nigerian Shippers’ Council’s vast reservoir of expertise and resources in the transportation sector, thereby ensuring a regulatory framework that is both efficacious and impactful. By leveraging the council’s extensive knowledge and experience, the bill is poised to introduce comprehensive and well-informed regulatory measures, culminating in a significantly enhanced economic landscape that fosters sustainable growth, improved market dynamics, and increased competitiveness within the industry. The bill provides a clear, comprehensive, and well-structured economic framework for the transport sector, laying the groundwork for a transformative shift in the industry, ultimately contributing to the nation’s economic development, prosperity, and overall well-being. This thoughtful and meticulous approach to regulation is a testament to the bill’s potential to drive meaningful change and promote a more robust and resilient economy.”
In summary, the Nigerian Shippers Council Bill is poised to bring about transformative changes in the transportation sector, promoting efficiency, aligning with global best practices, leveraging existing resources, and enhancing the economic framework of the transport sector. By doing so, the bill will have a profound impact on the industry, fostering a more robust, competitive, and sustainable transportation system that supports the nation’s economic growth and development.
While the proposed bill has raised concerns about potential increases in governance costs, proponents are quick to highlight the long-term benefits of a more robust and adaptive regulatory framework. They argue that the bill’s provisions for stakeholder engagement and feedback mechanisms will ensure that the regulatory framework remains responsive to the evolving needs of shippers, thereby offsetting initial implementation costs with sustained long-term gains. By fostering a more inclusive and responsive regulatory environment, the bill aims to promote the overall development and efficiency of the industry.
In conclusion, stakeholders are unanimous in their conviction that the Shippers’ Council is the most viable solution for the advancement of Nigeria’s maritime industry. With a meticulously designed regulatory framework, the industry is poised to become a significant driver of economic growth and development, as aptly emphasized by Mr. Adekola: “Regulation is not a burden but a necessary step towards a sustainable and prosperous maritime industry.” As the maritime industry navigates the complex waters of regulatory reform, the collective voices of experts and stakeholders converge on the belief that the proposed Shipping Regulatory Bill represents a pivotal step towards a more resilient, competitive, and globally integrated shipping landscape, characterized by enhanced efficiency, sustainability, and prosperity.
While the ultimate fate of the proposed bill – whether it is enacted, amended, or rejected altogether – remains uncertain, the public hearing process presents a crucial opportunity for stakeholders to articulate their concerns and ensure that any new regulations are effective, efficient, and aligned with the industry’s aspirations.
As the debate continues to unfold, it is evident that the bill has become a focal point for the industry’s collective aspirations, reflecting a shared commitment to charting a course towards a brighter future for shippers and the maritime ecosystem as a whole. The bill’s existential significance is undeniable, as it holds the key to unlocking a more sustainable, resilient, and competitive maritime industry, poised to make a meaningful contribution to the nation’s economic growth and development.
Business
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025
By femi Oyewale
Business
Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards
Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards
In celebration of the season of love, Adron Homes and Properties has announced the launch of its special Valentine campaign, “Love for Love” Promo, a customer-centric initiative designed to reward Nigerians who choose to express love through smart, lasting real estate investments.
The Love for Love Promo offers clients attractive discounts, flexible payment options, and an array of exclusive gift items, reinforcing Adron Homes’ commitment to making property ownership both rewarding and accessible. The campaign runs throughout the Valentine season and applies to the company’s wide portfolio of estates and housing projects strategically located across Nigeria.
Speaking on the promo, the company’s Managing Director, Mrs Adenike Ajobo, stated that the initiative is aimed at encouraging individuals and families to move beyond conventional Valentine gifts by investing in assets that secure their future. According to the company, love is best demonstrated through stability, legacy, and long-term value—principles that real estate ownership represents.
Under the promo structure, clients who make a payment of ₦100,000 receive cake, chocolates, and a bottle of wine, while those who pay ₦200,000 are rewarded with a Love Hamper. Payments of ₦500,000 attract a Love Hamper plus cake, and clients who pay ₦1,000,000 enjoy a choice of a Samsung phone or a Love Hamper with cake.
The rewards become increasingly premium as commitment grows. Clients who pay ₦5,000,000 receive either an iPad or an all-expenses-paid romantic getaway for a couple at one of Nigeria’s finest hotels, which includes two nights’ accommodation, special treats, and a Love Hamper. A payment of ₦10,000,000 comes with a choice of a Samsung Z Fold 7, three nights at a top-tier resort in Nigeria, or a full solar power installation.
For high-value investors, the Love for Love Promo delivers exceptional lifestyle experiences. Clients who pay ₦30,000,000 on land are rewarded with a three-night couple’s trip to Doha, Qatar, or South Africa, while purchasers of any Adron Homes house valued at ₦50,000,000 receive a double-door refrigerator.
The promo covers Adron Homes’ estates located in Lagos, Shimawa, Sagamu, Atan–Ota, Papalanto, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Osun, Ekiti, Abuja, Nasarawa, and Niger States, offering clients the opportunity to invest in fast-growing, strategically positioned communities nationwide.
Adron Homes reiterated that beyond the incentives, the campaign underscores the company’s strong reputation for secure land titles, affordable pricing, strategic locations, and a proven legacy in real estate development.
As Valentine’s Day approaches, Adron Homes encourages Nigerians at home and in the diaspora to take advantage of the Love for Love Promo to enjoy exceptional value, exclusive rewards, and the opportunity to build a future rooted in love, security, and prosperity.
Business
Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital
*Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital*
*BY BLAISE UDUNZE*
Despite the fragile 2024 economy grappling with inflation, currency volatility, and weak growth, Nigeria’s banking industry was widely portrayed as successful and strong amid triumphal headlines. The figures appeared to signal strength, resilience, and superior management as the Tier-1 banks such as Access Bank, Zenith Bank, GTBank, UBA, and First Bank of Nigeria, collectively reported profits approaching, and in some cases exceeding, N1 trillion. Surprisingly, a year later, these same banks touted as sound and solid are locked in a frenetic race to the capital markets, issuing rights offers and public placements back-to-back to meet the Central Bank of Nigeria’s N500 billion recapitalisation thresholds.
The contradiction is glaring. If Nigeria’s biggest banks are so profitable, why are they unable to internally fund their new capital requirements? Why have no fewer than 27 banks tapped the capital market in quick succession despite repeated assurances of balance-sheet robustness? And more fundamentally, what do these record profits actually say about the real health of the banking system?
The recapitalisation directive announced by the CBN in 2024 was ambitious by design. Banks with international licences were required to raise minimum capital to N500 billion by March 2026, while national and regional banks faced lower but still substantial thresholds ranging from N200 billion to N50 billion, respectively. Looking at the policy, it was sold as a modern reform meant to make banks stronger, more resilient in tough times, and better able to support major long-term economic development. In theory, strong banks should welcome such reforms. In practice, the scramble that followed has exposed uncomfortable truths about the structure of bank profitability in Nigeria.
At the heart of the inconsistency is a fundamental misunderstanding often encouraged by the banks themselves between profits and capital. Unknown to many, profitability, no matter how impressive, does not automatically translate into regulatory capital. Primarily, the CBN’s recapitalisation framework actually focuses on money paid in by shareholders when buying shares, fresh equity injected by investors over retained earnings or profits that exist mainly on paper.
This distinction matters because much of the profit surge recorded in 2024 and early 2025 was neither cash-generative nor sustainably repeatable. A significant portion of those headline banks’ profits reported actually came from foreign exchange revaluation gains following the sharp fall of the naira after exchange-rate unification. The industry witnessed that banks’ holding dollar-denominated assets their books showed bigger numbers as their balance sheets swell in naira terms, creating enormous paper profits without a corresponding improvement in underlying operational strength. These gains inflated income statements but did little to strengthen core capital, especially after the CBN barred banks from using FX revaluation gains for dividends or routine operations. In effect, banks looked richer without becoming stronger.
Beyond FX effects, Nigerian banks have increasingly relied on non-interest income fees, charges, and transaction levies to drive profitability. While this model is lucrative, it does not necessarily deepen financial intermediation or expand productive lending. High profits built on customer charges rather than loan growth offer limited support for long-term balance-sheet expansion. They also leave banks vulnerable when macroeconomic conditions shift, as is now happening.
Indeed, the recapitalisation exercise coincides with a turning point in the monetary cycle. The extraordinary conditions that supported bank earnings in 2024 and 2025 are beginning to unwind. Analysts now warn that Nigerian banks are approaching earnings reset, as net interest margins the backbone of traditional banking profitability, come under sustained pressure.
Renaissance Capital, in a January note, projects that major banks including Zenith, GTCO, Access Holdings, and UBA will struggle to deliver earnings growth in 2026 comparable to recent performance.
In a real sense, the CBN is expected to lower interest rates by 400 to 500 basis points because inflation is slowing down, and this means that banks will earn less on loans and government bonds, but they may not be able to quickly lower the interest they pay on deposits or other debts. The cash reserve requirements are still elevated, which does not earn interest; banks can’t easily increase or expand lending investments to make up for lower returns. The implications are significant. Net interest margin, the difference between what banks earn on loans and investments and what they pay on deposits, is poised to contract. Deposit competition is intensifying as lenders fight to shore up liquidity ahead of recapitalisation deadlines, pushing up funding costs. At the same time, yields on treasury bills and bonds, long a safe and lucrative haven for banks are expected to soften in a lower-rate environment. The result is a narrowing profit cushion just as banks are being asked to carry far larger equity bases.
Compounding this challenge is the fading of FX revaluation windfalls. With the naira relatively more stable in early 2026, the non-cash gains that once flattered bank earnings have largely evaporated. What remains is the less glamorous reality of core banking operations: credit risk management, cost efficiency, and genuine loan growth in a sluggish economy. In this new environment, maintaining headline profits will be far harder, even before accounting for the dilutive impact of recapitalisation.
That dilution is another underappreciated consequence of the capital rush. Massive share issuances mean that even if banks manage to sustain absolute profit levels, earnings per share and return on equity are likely to decline. Zenith, Access, UBA, and others are dramatically increasing their share counts. The same earnings pie is now being divided among many more shareholders, making individual returns leaner than during the pre-recapitalisation boom. For investors, the optics of strong profits may soon give way to the reality of weaker per-share performance.
Yet banks have pressed ahead, not only out of regulatory necessity but also strategic calculation.
During this period of recapitalization, investors are interested in the stock market with optimism, especially about bank shares, as banks are raising fresh capital, and this makes it easier to attract investments. This has become a season for the management teams to seize the moment to raise funds at relatively attractive valuations, strengthen ownership positions, and position themselves for post-recapitalisation dominance. In several cases, major shareholders and insiders have increased their stakes, as projected in the media, signalling confidence in long-term prospects even as near-term returns face pressure.
There is also a broader structural ambition at play. Well-capitalised banks can take on larger single obligor exposures, finance infrastructure projects, expand regionally, and compete more credibly with pan-African and global peers. From this perspective, recapitalisation is not merely about compliance but about reshaping the competitive hierarchy of Nigerian banking. What will be witnessed in the industry is that those who succeed will emerge larger, fewer, and more powerful. Those that fail will be forced into consolidation, retreat, or irrelevance.
For the wider economy, the outcome is ambiguous. Stronger banks with deeper capital buffers could improve systemic stability and enhance Nigeria’s ability to fund long-term development. The point is that while merging or consolidating banks may make them safer, it can also harm the market and the economy because it will reduce competition, let a few banks dominate, and encourage them to earn easy money from bonds and fees instead of funding real businesses. The truth be told, injecting more capital into the banks without complementary reforms in credit infrastructure, risk-sharing mechanisms, and fiscal discipline, isn’t enough as the aforementioned reforms are also needed.
The rush as exposed in this period, is that the moment Nigerian banks started raising new capital, the glaring reality behind their reported profits became clearer, that profits weren’t purely from good management, while the financial industry is not as sound and strong as its headline figures. The fact that trillion-naira profit banks must return repeatedly to shareholders for fresh capital is not a sign of excess strength, but of structural imbalance.
With the deadline for banks to raise new capital coming soon, by 31 March 2026, the focus has shifted from just raising N500 billion. N200 billion or N50 billion to think about the future shape and quality of Nigeria’s financial industry, or what it will actually look like afterward. Will recapitalisation mark a turning point toward deeper intermediation, lower dependence on speculative gains, and stronger support for economic growth? Or will it simply reset the numbers while leaving underlying incentives unchanged?
The answer will define the next chapter of Nigerian banking long after the capital market roadshows have ended and the profit headlines have faded.
Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
Business6 months agoBatsumi Travel CEO Lisa Sebogodi Wins Prestigious Africa Travel 100 Women Award
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING


