Connect with us

society

Airspace, Arrogance and Anarchy: Why Burkina Faso’s Seizure of a NAFc C-130 and 11 Nigerian Servicemen Threatens Regional Order

Published

on

Airspace, Arrogance and Anarchy: Why Burkina Faso’s Seizure of a NAFc C-130 and 11 Nigerian Servicemen Threatens Regional Order.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

“How an “UNAUTHORISED” emergency landing in Bobo-Dioulasso exposed the fracture between the Alliance of Sahel States and ECOWAS — and why legal norms, diplomacy and cool heads must prevail.”

On 8 December 2025 a routine ferry flight by a Nigerian Air Force C-130 turned overnight into one of West Africa’s most dangerous diplomatic dramas. What Nigerian authorities describe as a precautionary, technical landing in Bobo-Dioulasso was treated by Burkina Faso and its Sahel partners as an airspace violation. Eleven Nigerian military personnel were detained and the aircraft impounded whereby a flashpoint in an already fractured regional landscape. The fallout since has been swift, ugly and instructive.

This is not a story about a single aircraft. It is a story about sovereignty, competing regional blocs, the fragility of international aviation law under political strain and the damage that escalatory language can do when armed governments face one another across a thin skin of protocol and precedent.

The facts (what we can establish reliably). Nigerian accounts say the C-130 was en route on a ferry mission to Portugal when a “TECHNICAL CONCERN” forced a precautionary landing in Bobo-Dioulasso; Nigeria’s Air Force insists crew and passengers were safe and that normal aviation procedures were followed. Burkina Faso’s ruling military authorities though speaking through the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) – say the aircraft entered Burkinabé airspace without prior authorisation and described the incident as an “UNFRIENDLY ACT.” The Alliance warned that in future it would neutralise unauthorised aircraft. Sahara reporters and the Nigerian media have all reported these competing claims.

Why this incident matters beyond the immediate headlines. Sovereignty and the primacy of airspace control. Under the Chicago Convention and customary international practice every State enjoys complete and exclusive sovereignty over the airspace above its territory. States may (and do) take defensive measures when they believe their airspace has been violated. Though that rule coexists with another clear principle: emergency landings for safety are an accepted feature of civil-military aviation and normally trigger established communications, escorts or diplomatic notifications though not seizing and publicly humiliating crew. The collision of these two principles creates a dangerous grey zone.

AES vs ECOWAS: a geopolitical schism. The seizure cannot be divorced from the political context: Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have broken with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). That split has hardened narratives of hostility between the two blocs. Recent Nigerian involvement in neighbouring crises (including air operations connected to events in Benin) has heightened AES suspicions about Nigerian military activity in the region. This is not merely a diplomatic spat; it is the manifestation of two competing systems for regional order. Analysts at the Institute for Security Studies have warned that “stability in West Africa requires that both organisations take pragmatic and flexible approaches.” That warning has never been more urgent.

The risks of escalation. When a military junta pronounces it will “NEUTRALISE” unauthorised aircraft, that is not mere rhetoric but it is a doctrine that invites miscalculation. Intercepting or firing on a military transport (even one allegedly in breach of airspace rules) could produce casualties, retaliation, wider interstate military posturing, or a tit-for-tat pattern that drags neighbouring states into open confrontation. The incident exposed how quickly regional norms can be weaponised.

Where the Nigerian government stands (and why diplomacy must lead). The Federal Government opened diplomatic channels immediately after the incident. Abuja insists the landing was precautionary and says its crew were treated humanely; the Nigerian Air Force publicly denied a deliberate airspace violation and described the landing as an emergency measure. At the same time, Nigeria cannot treat the episode as simply an operational mishap: it is a diplomatic crisis that requires urgent, senior-level engagement to avoid further deterioration. Reports confirm that Abuja has moved to raise the matter through its foreign ministry and through regional interlocutors.

Voices and warnings from the region and experts
(Assimi Goïta, the Malian figurehead of the AES, publicly called the incident an “UNFRIENDLY ACT” and directed AES partners to treat unauthorised incursions firmly) language that underscores how seriously the alliance regards perceived threats. That tone, while politically resonant within AES constituencies, is dangerous in interstate practice because it narrows the margin for de-escalation.

– On the other side, the Nigerian Air Force’s spokesman, Air Commodore Ehimen Ejodame, categorically described the landing as a precautionary move due to technical concern; Abuja’s account stresses standard aviation safety obligations and seeks to frame the episode as a non-hostile emergency landing. That competing narrative, unresolvably opposed in public, fuels popular outrage on both sides.

– Regional analysts Djiby Sow and Hassane Koné of the ISS have cautioned that “stability in West Africa requires that both organisations take pragmatic and flexible approaches,” an apt reminder that durable security cannot be built on unilateral muscle or provocative signalling. Their analysis points to the deeper structural problem: two rival regional orders with overlapping geographies and incompatible political projects.

Legal notes for what international law allows and forbids:

International aviation law recognises both the sovereignty of states over their airspace and the necessity of emergency landings for safety. There is precedent for interception and diversion in bona fide security scenarios, but the law expects proportionality, communication and diplomatic resolution, but not detention and seizure as a first response. States that callously or reflexively detain foreign crews after emergency landings risk breaching obligations of humane treatment and peaceful dispute settlement. In practice, the legal rules require interpretation through a prism of good faith and common sense.

Recommendations and how to prevent this episode from becoming a catastrophe:

Immediate, senior diplomatic engagement. Nigeria must pursue quiet, high-level talks with Burkina Faso mediated by neutral ECOWAS or AU envoys to secure the immediate release of any property still impounded and to establish transparent facts. Public posturing should be replaced by private negotiation.

An independent fact-finding and technical review. Aviation experts (ICAO-compatible) should be given access to the aircraft and records to determine whether the landing was an unavoidable emergency or avoidable deviation. A neutral technical finding would deprive propagandists of oxygen.

Confidence-building measures between AES and ECOWAS. The two blocs must restore minimum channels for incident management: hotlines, agreed protocols for overflight and emergency landing, and mutually accepted procedures for military aircraft transiting neighbouring states. The alternative is a drift into permanent suspicion and frequent crises.

Airspace, Arrogance and Anarchy: Why Burkina Faso’s Seizure of a NAFc C-130 and 11 Nigerian Servicemen Threatens Regional Order.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester

A public narrative of restraint. Leaders must avoid escalationist language. Warnings about “neutralising” airborne platforms are inflammatory and unnecessary when diplomacy and technical verification remain available.

Endnote; the test of leadership. This episode is a test. It tests Nigeria’s capacity for sober diplomacy; it tests Burkina Faso’s willingness to separate security concerns from showmanship; it tests the region’s ability to manage rival blocs without sliding into armed confrontation. If handled well, the incident can be contained and even used as a spur to create robust incident-management mechanisms. If mishandled, it could set a precedent for a dangerous new normal: where emergency landings become pretexts for seizure, and interstate suspicion becomes a constant driver of instability.

In the end, airplanes are not the only things that fly — words and consequences do too. The courageous, responsible thing now is restraint, verification and a deliberate commitment to dialogue. Anything less will turn an avoidable emergency into a preventable tragedy.

Sahara weekly online is published by First Sahara weekly international. contact [email protected]

society

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy Light Up Ofada Rice Day 7.0

Published

on

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy Light Up Ofada Rice Day 7.0

 

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy Light Up Ofada Rice Day 7.0

 

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy, and a host of leading Nigerian artistes and comedians lit up the 7th edition of the largest indigenous food festival, Ofada Rice Day, themed “Eko Dun Joor.” The event, held at Muri Okunola Park, Victoria Island, Lagos, attracted over 8,000 attendees.

 

The festival celebrated the richness of Nigerian culture, cuisine, and entertainment, bringing together leading brands such as PocketMoni (headline sponsor), Goldberg, Maltina, Fatgbems Group, BetNaija, Action Bitters, and partners including Golden Penny, MTN, Pepsi, Arthill Studio, among others. These brands delivered back-to-back engagements across various audience segments throughout the event.

 

Dignitaries from the Canadian Deputy High Commission, top officials from the Federal and Lagos State Governments, as well as prominent traditional rulers from the South-West, graced the occasion. The event also featured electrifying performances by top Nigerian entertainers, including Haruna Ishola, Reminisce, Dotun, Mide, Awesome Band, Elijah, SquadOne, Alex Osho, Lolo, Hyenana, and Gbenga Adeyinka, among others.

Food vendors from across Ogun State, including Ikenne, Itoko, and Iperu, showcased their culinary expertise, offering a wide range of delicacies that highlighted the versatility and uniqueness of Ofada rice.

 

The festival received high praise from key stakeholders. Ms. Abisola Olusanya, Lagos State Commissioner for Agriculture, commended Ofadaboy for its commitment to promoting Ofada rice, preserving Nigerian food traditions, and leading the “Dirty December” conversation with seven consecutive years of exceptional showcases.

Similarly, Dr. Abisoye Fagade, Director-General of the National Institute of Hospitality and Tourism, applauded the brand’s dedication to projecting Nigerian cuisine on the global stage.

 

Speaking at the festival, Tobi Fletcher, Creative Director of Ofadaboy, alongside Oyinda Fletcher, Chief Operating Officer, expressed gratitude to attendees and partners.

“This milestone is a testament to our passion for promoting Nigerian cuisine and culture. We are excited about the future and look forward to continuing this journey,” Tobi Fletcher said.

 

As a leading name in food and hospitality, Ofadaboy operates a thriving restaurant, provides premium catering services, and produces a range of quality food products, including packaged Ofada rice and spices. The brand has firmly established itself as a champion of Nigerian food and culture, earning widespread recognition for its innovative approach to showcasing local cuisine.

 

Salawa Abeni, Segun Johnson, Bro Shaggy Light Up Ofada Rice Day 7.0

Continue Reading

society

THE COURAGE OF A LION: WHY SEYI MAKINDE IS DESTINED FOR NATIONAL GREATNESS

Published

on

THE COURAGE OF A LION: WHY SEYI MAKINDE IS DESTINED FOR NATIONAL GREATNESS

 

In every generation, a leader emerges whose vision, courage, and commitment to progress distinguish him from the rest. In the Southwest today, one such leader is His Excellency, Engr. Seyi Makinde, FNSE, the Executive Governor of Oyo State. His unwavering dedication to modern governance, infrastructural renewal, agricultural development, inclusive empowerment, and the strategic repositioning of Oyo State for global competitiveness has earned him widespread respect across Nigeria.

 

Under his leadership, Oyo State has recorded remarkable and unprecedented development. From massive road construction and urban renewal to improved agricultural productivity; from people-centred empowerment initiatives to transparent, accountable governance, Governor Makinde has redefined purposeful leadership in contemporary Nigeria.

 

It is within this context that I must speak with sincerity and clarity.

Despite the fact that I have not personally benefited from the administration of Governor Seyi Makinde, and notwithstanding my independent convictions, I continue to offer my unwavering support and admiration for him and his leadership. This position, shared by my team, is rooted not in personal gain but in an objective assessment of his tenacity, vision, and relentless pursuit of a better society. His transformational ideas and achievements in Oyo State speak louder than any personal interest.

 

This level of honesty underscores a fundamental truth: genuine appreciation of leadership transcends self-interest; it is anchored in the ability to recognize progress, integrity, and service to the greater good.

 

Recently, narratives have emerged suggesting that Governor Makinde is politically isolated within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the Southern region. History, however, teaches us that such moments often precede the rise of iconic national figures. A clear example is Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu during his tenure as Governor of Lagos State. At a time when the PDP controlled almost the entire South, Tinubu stood alone—strategic, resilient, and unwavering. His ability to sustain and expand his political structure ultimately propelled him to national prominence and, eventually, the Presidency.

 

What some describe as isolation today is, in reality, a season of refinement and preparation. It is often the crucible through which leaders of national consequence are forged. Engr. Seyi Makinde’s consistency, courage, political maturity, and commitment to truth unmistakably position him on the path to national relevance.

 

While detractors may mock him, I see the emergence of a formidable national force—a morning star rising from the Southwest. I see a rallying point for unity, strength, and the protection of Yoruba interests within the Nigerian federation. I see a courageous leader whose influence will soon transcend regional boundaries. Nigeria must pay close attention: a leader of immense capacity is emerging.

 

Engr. Seyi Makinde embodies the boldness of a lion—the fearless Ibadan spirit—standing firm for justice and truth, even when such stands are inconvenient. This is precisely the caliber of leadership Nigeria requires in these defining times.

 

Indeed, I see a greater, stronger, and more visionary leader rising from the Yoruba race—one destined to help shape the future of our nation.

 

— Olalere Benedict Adetunji

Convener,

Coalition of Yoruba Students and Youth Movement (COYSYM)

0706 183 0662

 

Continue Reading

society

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address

Published

on

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

“Neglect, stigma and policy gaps are fueling substance misuse among Nigeria’s most vulnerable and silence is costing lives.”

 

Nigeria likes to talk about inclusion, but talk without action has a human cost and one that is rarely counted. Behind closed doors and in the margins of health statistics, drug and substance misuse is wreaking havoc on people with disabilities (PWDs) across the country. This is not an unfortunate footnote; it is a predictable outcome of exclusion (social, medical and legal) that we have chosen to ignore.

Global and local evidence points to the same uncomfortable truth: people with disabilities are at higher risk of substance use and are less likely to receive appropriate treatment. International studies show that adults with disabilities report disproportionately high rates of substance use and adverse mental health symptoms compared with their non-disabled peers. These patterns are mediated by chronic pain, untreated mental-health disorders, social isolation and poverty with all conditions common among Nigerian PWDs.

Why this happens is painfully simple. Many people with disabilities live with chronic pain or long-term health conditions for which medication is necessary; others face untreated depression, anxiety and trauma. When health systems are inaccessible, poorly resourced, or openly hostile, self-medication becomes an easy (and dangerous) option. Add stigma and social exclusion and the risk escalates: illicit substances, alcohol, codeine-laden cough syrups and diverted prescription drugs become stopgap “TREATMENTS” for pain, loneliness and despair. The World Health Organization explicitly warns that persons with disabilities are more likely to face risk factors for tobacco, alcohol and drug use because they are often left out of public health interventions.

In Nigeria the problem has particular features. National-level surveys and UN estimates indicate that drug use is widespread in the country: a sizeable share of Nigerians between 15 and 64 (measured in millions) are affected by drug misuse, and substances such as tramadol and codeine-based syrups have become common in both urban and rural settings. Meanwhile, enforcement-focused headlines about drug seizures and legislative crackdowns obscure the human reality: far too many people who need treatment cannot access it. UN reporting notes that globally only about one in eleven people with drug use disorders receive treatment — an equity gap that hits PWDs especially hard.

There are three converging failures driving this hidden crisis in Nigeria.

1. Health systems and services are inaccessible or ill-equipped.
Rehabilitation, mental-health care and substance-use treatment services in Nigeria are chronically underfunded and concentrated in a handful of urban centres. Even where services exist, they are rarely adapted for persons with sensory, cognitive or mobility impairments — meaning that facilities, intake procedures, therapy methods and communication approaches exclude those who most need help. Research in multiple settings has shown that substance-use screening and treatment must include disability accommodations and comprehensive pain management; otherwise, PWDs fall through the cracks.

2. Stigma and social isolation push vulnerable people into substance use.
Violence, neglect and discrimination against children and adults with disabilities are well documented. International studies report alarmingly high rates of abuse and neglect of disabled children and teenagers — environments that predispose survivors to substance misuse later in life. In Nigeria, cultural stigma combined with poverty and lack of social protection amplifies the risk: ostracised individuals may turn to substances to cope with trauma and exclusion.

3. Policy and legal frameworks exist but are not implemented or aligned.
Nigeria’s Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities (Prohibition) Act 2018 created legal obligations to integrate and protect PWDs. That law, however, has not been matched by robust investment in disability-aware mental-health services, nor by targeted substance-use programs for PWDs. At the same time, the country’s current public conversation often leans toward punitive measures against drug offenders rather than public-health strategies that address addiction as a medical and social problem. Recent moves in the legislature to stiffen criminal penalties for trafficking, while addressing supply-side harms, risk further marginalising people who need treatment rather than punishment.

What must be done is clear, if politically uncomfortable: treat this as a public-health and human-rights emergency, not an embarrassing exception to be hidden.

First, expand access to disability-inclusive treatment. Health facilities and substance-use programs must be made physically and clinically accessible. That means ramps and sign-language interpretation, yes — but also adapting clinical screening tools, counseling approaches and pain-management strategies to different impairment types. International evidence shows that substance-use interventions that account for pain and comorbid mental disorders reduce misuse and improve outcomes; Nigeria must tailor these approaches and scale them beyond elite urban clinics.

Second, invest in community-based prevention and social protection. Poverty, unemployment and social isolation are key drivers. Cash transfers, supported employment schemes, community rehabilitation programs and family support can reduce the conditions that lead people to self-medicate. Civil-society organisations and disabled-persons organisations (DPOs) are best placed to guide culturally appropriate prevention work — they must be funded and partnered with, not sidelined.

Third, collect the right data. You cannot manage what you do not measure. National surveys and drug-control reports must disaggregate by disability status, impairment type and gender. That data gap means policymakers have no reliable estimate of the scale of the problem among PWDs — and therefore no political imperative to act. Recent Nigerian and international studies give us indications; what we need is systematic, routine surveillance integrated into national drug and health surveys.

Fourth, shift from punishment to treatment. Public policy must rebalance from criminalisation toward evidence-based treatment and harm reduction. Where trafficking and organised crime require law enforcement, do so — but not at the cost of denying care to people with addiction who are also living with disabilities. The human-rights implications of mandatory incarceration for people with mental-health comorbidities must be taken seriously.

Finally, we must break the silence. Families, communities and politicians treat disability as a private tragedy. Addiction among PWDs becomes doubly invisible: the stigma of disability plus the stigma of drug use. Nigeria’s media, universities and policy forums must expose this reality and hold leaders accountable for the gap between the law’s promise and the lived experience of millions.

To the policymakers reading this: the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities Act 2018 is not a placard to be posted on ministry walls — it is a legal platform that demands resources, enforcement and services. To the NDLEA and health ministries: seize the moment to partner with DPOs, donors and community groups to pilot disability-inclusive treatment models that can be scaled nationwide. To civil society: press for data, for pilots and for funding that reaches grassroots organisations.

Addiction among people with disabilities is not a “special interest” issue — it is a test of our humanity. If a nation claims to value inclusion, then it must protect the most vulnerable from a tide of substances, neglect and institutional failure. Anything less is hypocrisy.

If Nigeria does not act, the toll will grow: more lives shortened, families broken and talents wasted. But if we choose compassion, transparency and evidence, we can transform a hidden crisis into a model of inclusive care. The legislation is on the books; now let our actions prove that we meant it.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending