Connect with us
Advertisment

Business

Abia: Court dismisses Ikpeazu’s application to reverse sack

Published

on

Primate Ayodele

Okezie-Victor-Ikpeazu

Advertisment

The Federal High Court in Abuja, yesterday, dismissed as lacking in merit an application seeking to set aside the enrolled order of the judgment that sacked Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State from office. This came on a day presiding judge of the Federal High Court, Owerri, Justice A. I. Alagoa, fixed July 8 to deliver judgment on the tax forgery suit filed against Ikpeazu by a chieftain of Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, in Abia State, Mr. Friday Nwosu.

The court, in a ruling by Justice Okon Abang, maintained that all the orders contained in the judgment it delivered against Ikpeazu on June 27 subsist until they were set aside by the appellate court. Justice Abang gave the ruling on a day the embattled governor, through his team of four Senior Advocates of Nigeria, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, applied for an order restraining the beneficiary of the verdict, Mr. Uche Ogah, and the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, from executing the judgment.

Advertisment

The judge had, in his judgment, ordered Ikpeazu to vacate his office, even as he directed INEC to immediately issue a fresh certificate of return to Ogah, who came second in the governorship primary election of the PDP. Although INEC had since issued certificate of return to Ogah, another court in Abia State had restrained the Chief Judge from swearing him in.

Ikpeazu wants order set aside Meantime, Ikpeazu, through his lawyers, yesterday, re-approached the high court, praying it to set aside its order dated June 27 that led to the issuance of certificate of return to Ogah. Olanipekun urged the court to take judicial notice that INEC issued certificate of return to Ogah on June 30, despite the fact that it was served with Ikpeazu’s notice of appeal and application for stay of execution at exactly 12:50 p.m on June 28.

He contended that INEC acted wrongly by going ahead to issue the certificate to Ogah, two days after it was served with the appeal processes. Olanipekun told the court that his client had filed “a comprehensive and elaborate notice of appeal,” and was “desirous of speedy and expeditious determination of the matter.” Ogah accuses Ikpeazu of resorting to self-help However, Ogah, who was represented by five SANs, led by Dr. Alex Iziyon, urged the court to refuse Ikpeazu’s prayer for stay of execution of the judgment.

Advertisement

Ogah told the court that Ikpeazu obtained a restraining order from another high court at Osisioma in Abia State that prevented him from being sworn in. He stressed that Ikpeazu got the restraining order from the high court in Abia when his motion for stay of execution was already pending before the court in Abuja. “Where a party has taken to self-help, your lordship should refuse to indulge them further,” he argued.

Responding, Olanipekun said it was Ogah and INEC that “deliberately and calculatively resorted to self-help in order to frustrate both the motion for stay of execution and the pending appeal.” He relied on Order 4 Rule 1(2) of the Judgment Enforcement Rules to argue that there should have been a timeline for enforcement of the June 27 verdict that removed his client. Olanipekun insisted that INEC “illegally tampered with the rest of the case” by issuing certificate of return to Ogah, despite the pending appeal against the judgment.

He also prayed the court to adjourn hearing on the motion for stay of execution until Thursday to enable him respond to a further affidavit filed by Ogah. On its part, INEC lawyer, Mr. Alhassan Umar, told the court that the commission had already issued certificate of return to Ogah as it was ordered to do, before it was served with Ikpeazu’s motion for stay. Umar said though the certificate was signed on June 28, it was, however, handed to Ogah two days later.

According to INEC lawyer, “My lord ordered the 3rd defendant to issue certificate of return forthwith and upon service of the order, my lord, on June 28, the 3rd defendant issued a certificate of return accordingly. “The certificate of return was issued before we were served with the motion on June 28. We had issued the certificate upon being served with the court order. But the actual presentation of the certificate was on June 30. But we had complied with the order of my lord. “We had no difficulty to issue the certificate because election matters are sui-generis. Where the law intends that an appeal should operate as a stay, it is expressly provided so.

In our view, this matter is not regulated by Section 143 of the Electoral Act.” My order sacking Ikpeazu stays —Judge In his ruling, Justice Abang refused to set aside the order containing the judgment against Ikpeazu, even as he adjourned hearing on the motion for stay of execution till Thursday. The judge said he would on that day also decide on an application by Ogah seeking to set aside the restraining order of the High Court in Abia State, as well as an application asking him to set aside the certificate of return INEC issued to Ogah. Justice Abang held that the enrolment order against Ikpeazu was properly signed and issued.

The judge said though section 294 of the constitution allowed the court to get the judgment ready within seven days, he said the registry ensured it was available in four days, owing to pressure from Ikpeazu. He said: “I had jurisdiction to sign the enrolment order as at the time I did so. The court cannot order a sitting governor to vacate his office just for fun.

We are here to settle dispute and I am not afraid to take decision. “Therefore, those going to the media to misinterpret the decision of the court when they have not even taken out time to study the 131-page judgment should take caution.” Judgment on tax forgery suit for July 8 Meanwhile, presiding judge of the Federal High Court, Owerri, Justice A. I. Alagoa, has fixed July 8, to deliver judgment on the tax forgery suit filed against Ikpeazu by Nwosu. Nwosu, who ran for the December 8, 2014, PDP governorship primaries in the state, had accused the governor of submitting a forged tax clearance certificate, praying the court to disqualify him.

Joined in the suit were the PDP, INEC, Ikpeazu and Ogah as 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, respectively. The parties adopted their written addresses. Counsel to Nwosu, F. Unyimadu, prayed the court to grant the prayers of his client by disqualifying Ikpeazu for submitting forged tax certificate and declare him governor. Unyimadu added that the governor was not qualified to run for the primary election.

He further argued that Ogah, who refused to sign the result and petitioned the PDP to conduct another primary election, had forfeited his right to benefit from the exercise. In their separate arguments, counsel to PDP, INEC, Ikpeazu and Ogah, Paul Ananaba (SAN), Jude Nnodum (SAN), Theo Nkire and O.J. Nnadi (SAN), respectively, said Nwosu’s suit lacked merit and urged the court to dismiss it. Earlier, the counsel had opposed an attempt by Ogah’s counsel to leverage on the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which declared him governor.

This was upheld by the judge, who ruled that he was not bound by the verdict of a court of the same hierarchy. In a related development, Nwosu has filed a notice of appeal on the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which declared Ogah as governor, praying the court to set it aside and declare him governor.

In a notice of appeal filed against Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/71/2016, between Sir Friday Nwanozie Nwosu (Appellant) and Sampson Uchechukwu Ogah, Peoples Democratic Party, Dr. Okezie Victor Ikpeazu, and the Independent National Electoral Commission, as Respondents, Nwosu listed nine grounds of appeal and particulars of error on the judgment delivered by Justice Okon Abang on October 27. While praying the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment, Nwosu also sought five reliefs: “an order setting aside the declaration of first respondent, Uche Ogah, as the elected governor of Abia State as declared by the trial court. Others include: “an order that the first Respondent, Uche Ogah, is stopped from claiming any right or benefit from the second respondent’s (PDP) Gubernatorial Primary Election of 8/12/2014, in Abia State, having waived his right to do so; an order striking out the first respondent’s (Uche Ogah) suit on the ground that it constitutes an abuse of court process; an order that the suit of first respondent i.e. (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/71/2016) is incompetent and the trial court lacks the jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit.” lNEC must reverse itself —

PDP chieftain Reacting to the development, Mr. Ben Onyechere, a PDP chieftain and former Special Assistant to Dr. Alex Ekwueme, said the rush by INEC to implement the judgment of a Federal High Court that annulled the election of Governor Okezie Ikpeazu of Abia State on the reason that it did not receive the notice of appeal from the governor’s lawyers was a clear indication of a well scripted conspiracy and attempt to disenfranchise the entire Abia electorate. According to him, the judgment is the worst embarrassment that has befallen the judiciary in recent times. He said: “The ruling by Justice Abang is a dangerous trend occurring in an area reputed for high volatility, especially with the presence of a pro-Biafran group whom the governor is labouring to assuage.

It is indeed curious and laughable to behold an INEC official with guilt written all over him on TV saying that they never received notice of appeal from Ikpeazu’s lawyer, only to admit receipt of appeal after perpetrating their plan. “The judge, who turned himself to prosecutor, investigator and adjudicator, refused to determine a simple fact of whether the governor was actually working for government which automatically means his taxes were deductible on monthly basis.

“However, the onus now rests on INEC officials, who have now admitted receipt of the appeal, to quickly reverse themselves without delay to avert the looming disaster in Abia.” Ikpeazu submitted tax certificate in error —Abia PDP Also reacting, Abia State chapter of the PDP, yesterday, said the tax certificate submitted to INEC by Ikpeazu was done in error, saying tax certificate was not one of the requirements to run for the office of governor.

The party also alleged that Ogah had very powerful forces backing him in the fight to sack Ikpeazu as governor of Abia State but did not name the powerful forces. A statement signed by Chief Johnson Onuigbo, Ikechukwu Omenihu, and Sir. Don Ubani, the party’s state chairman, Legal Adviser and Publicity Secretary, respectively, said tax certificate had never been a requirement to run for office of the governor, insisting that Ikpeazu’s aides put it in error.

It said: “Nigerians should be informed that there is no requirement for payment of tax at all or as and when due in the constitution, Electoral Act or INEC nomination form. The tax documents were included in the documents accompanying his nomination form by Dr. Ikpeazu’s aides by mistake. “The tax documents included by aides of Dr. Ikpeazu in the nomination form sent to INEC are genuine and there are absolutely no false entries in them and even if for purposes of argument, there were mistakes in the tax documents, Dr. Ikpeazu was not responsible for such mistakes and the mandate given him by hundreds of thousands of Abia voters cannot be invalidated on the basis of a spurious and unfounded allegation.

Citing some legal decisions, the party said: “We have taken the trouble to set out these few examples of the principles governing our democratic process just to demonstrate to Nigerians what is under attack by Uche Ogah and his cohorts: a sacrosanct mandate donated to Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu by citizens of Abia State. “It is the constitution that sets out the criteria for eligibility to stand for election as governor.

By Section 177 of the 1999 Constitution, there are only four requirements or conditions for eligibility to the office of Governor: citizenship of Nigeria, attainment of 35 years of age, membership/sponsorship of a political party and education up to School Certificate level or its equivalent. “Section 182 of the Constitution sets out other events that could disqualify a candidate and non-payment of tax at all or as and when due is not one of them. There is no requirement for payment of tax under the Electoral Act.

An examination of the nomination form for all elective offices in Nigeria, including for governorship shows clearly that payment of tax is not mentioned and tax receipts or tax clearance certificates are not one of the documents required to be included in the form. “Dr. Ikpeazu’s tax documents were either mistakenly included in the bundle of documents accompanying his Nomination Form by his aides or simply added out of the abundance of caution.” Enforce judgment now—EUF But a group, the Eastern Unity Forum (EUF) has demanded the immediate enforcement of the order of the Federal High Court that removed Ikpeazu from the office as governor of Abia State, urging the Attorney General of the Federation, Inspector General of Police, the Director of the Department of State Services and other security agencies to enforce the court order without further delay and avoid brewing anarchy in the state.

It described the judgment obtained by Ikpeazu as judicial coup, occasioned by impunity which must not be allowed to stand. The group at a press briefing in Abuja, yesterday, by its National President, Chief Emmanuel Okereke and National Secretary, Chief Willy Ezugwu, vowed to mobilize the people to enforce the court judgment if security agencies failed to do their job. Describing the court verdict obtained by the embattled Abia State governor from the state High Court as a judicial coup, the group said: “For Mr. Okezie Ikpeazu to rush to another court of coordinate jurisdiction to arrest the unambiguous judgment delivered by Justice Okon Abang on Monday, June 27, 2016 which ordered that Ogah be sworn in immediately is nothing but a delay tactics and judicial coup that must not be allowed to stand.

We, therefore, call on the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the Inspector General of Police (IGP), the Director of Department of State Services (DSS) and all other security agencies and law enforcement agencies of the Federal Government to wake up and be alive to their constitutional duties and ensure that Dr. Uchechukwu Sampson Ogah is sworn in as Abia State governor without further delay.” Declare Alex Otti gov —APGA In another development, the All Progressives Grand Alliance, APGA, Abia State chapter, has faulted the judgment of the Federal High Court which ordered that Ogah be sworn in as the state governor.

A statement signed by APGA state chairman, Augustine Ehiemere, decried the judgment as untenable as the Electoral Act 2010, as amended, forbade any person who did not take part in all stages of the election to be sworn in and insisted that its governorship candidate in the 2015 election, Dr. Alex Otti, remained the lawful candidate who ought to be declared governor. “APGA considers Uche Ogah’s declaration as a huge error, unacceptable to the party, untenable in Nigeria’s 2010 Electoral Act as amended, which forbids any person that did not take part in all the stages of an election from being declared winner.

Since there is no record anywhere to show that Dr. Uche Ogah won the primaries of his party, the PDP, let alone take part in all the stages of the last governorship election in Abia, his declaration as the governor by the court is strange and alien to the law. “Hence, we humbly demand that the appellate court, while upholding Ikpeazu guilty verdict, corrects this huge error by issuing the right order which is to declare the candidate who scored the highest lawful votes, the APGA candidate, Dr. Alex Otti, governor, as he did not only meet all the constitutional requirements and vote spread across the state, but even won more local governments than the sacked Okezie Ikpeazu; this is an incontrovertible fact.”

Advertisment
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Bank

Fidelity Bank: Improved Share Price as Growth Indicator

Published

on

Houston, Texas gears up for Fidelity Bank's FITCC Trade Expo

Fidelity Bank: Improved Share Price as Growth Indicator

 

Advertisment

 

When the management of the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) in July 2023 announced that it was reclassifying Fidelity Bank Plc from small-price stock to medium-price stock, financial analysts concluded that the road to attaining Tier1 status by the bank is closer than ever imagined.

Advertisment

In full year 2022. Fidelity Bank briefly fell into the Tier 1 category and saw the highest gross earnings of N337.10 billion and profit before tax of N53.68 billion. The bank’s higher interest income relative to interest expense led to a net interest margin of 7.70 per cent, ahead of other similar banks.

Regarding its financial position, the bank had the highest total assets at N3.99 trillion in 2022. The bank’s relatively low-risk asset exposure kept non-performing loans (NPLs) at 2.90 per cent, the second lowest in the Tier 2 category ahead of Wema Bank.

Although the group has struggled with curtailing operating costs with CIR above 50 per cent, Fidelity earned the second lowest CIR among Tier 2 banks at 59.00 per cent, slightly behind FCMB at 53.90 per cent in FY 2022.

Advertisement

In 9M 2023, Fidelity Bank, according to Proshare analysts will rise to full Tier 1 status in its next Tier 1 Banking Sector Report review based on Proshare’s Banking Strength Index (PBSI)) led second-tier banks in gross earnings, profitability, total assets, customer deposits, and loans and advances.
However, its non-performing loan ratio (NPLR) rose to 3.54 per cent after Wema Bank’s 2.50 per cent, while its cost-to-income ratio (CIR) settled at 49.86 per cent, which was an improvement from the previous year’s ratio.

Significantly, in its full-year 2023 results, the bank’s total assets as of December 31, 2023 has risen to N6.2 trillion.

The bank closed 2023 as the fifth best banking stock on the floor of the NGX with a share price of N10.85 and a market capitalization of N347.3 billion, depicting an annual gain of 149.4 per cent, Fidelity Bank also showcased a commendable financial performance.
Notably, it achieved a net income of N91.8 billion in the nine months ending September 2023, reflecting a substantial 162.46% year-on-year growth from the corresponding period in 2022.

Furthermore, the bank registered an impressive return on equity of 28.48 per cent during the first nine months of 2023.

The 2023 performance of the bank was similar to that of 2022 as it was one of the three banks that led the list of the best-performing banks on the NGX. The other banks are FCMB and FBN Holdings.

The research pours into the performance of thirteen of Nigeria’s largest commercial banks analyzing improvement year on year over two quarters.

The analysis revealed that the thirteen banks raked in a sum of N298.84 billion as post-tax profit between July and September 2022, representing an increase of 29.9 per cent compared to N228.54 billion recorded in the corresponding period of 2021.

The commercial banks remained resilient despite economic headwinds, which saw the nation’s aggregate GDP growth slowed to 2.25 per cent in Q3 2022 from 3.54 per cent recorded in the previous quarter and 4.03 per cent in the corresponding period of 2021.

Also, banks’ loans to customers grew by 5.5 per cent between June and September 2022 to stand at N23.76 trillion, representing a net new loan of N1.23 trillion in three months. However, this showed a slightly slower growth than the 6.81 per cent increase recorded in the comparable period of 2021.

NGX reclassification

The NGX said the reclassification became necessary because Fidelity Bank shares have been trading above the N5.00 mark since February 2023.
According to the NGX, rule 15.29 of the Rulebook of the Exchange, 2015 (Dealing Members’ Rules) notes that equities priced above N5 per share for at least four of the most recent six months of trading, or new security listings priced above N5 per share at the time of listing on NGX are classified as medium price stock.

“Fidelity Bank traded above the N5.00 mark on February 20, 2023 and has remained above the N5 mark up until close of business on 30 June 2023.
“This indicates that Fidelity Bank has been trading above N5 for at least four months in the last six months. Therefore, it should be reclassified from small price stock to medium price stock,” it pointed out.

The bank has continued to post commendable financial performance every quarter as it cements its position amongst tier-one banks in the country.
In the half-year 2023 results and for the second year running, the bank emerged as the company with the highest earnings per share on the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX).

According to a report, Fidelity Bank, Seplat Energy, Total Energies, Okomu Oil, Presco, Dangote Cement, MTN Nigeria, BUA Foods, First City Monument Bank (FCMB) and Geregu Power emerged as the companies with the highest earnings per share within that review period.
Earnings per share (EPS) is a company’s net profit divided by the number of common shares it has outstanding.
It also indicates how much money a company makes for each share of its stock and is a widely used metric for estimating corporate value.

A higher EPS indicates greater value because investors will pay more for a company’s shares if they think the company has higher profits relative to its share price.

Fidelity Bank recorded an earnings per share of N184 in the first half of 2023 from N79 in the first half of 2022.
The share price of the bank as of Thursday, April 25, 2024, stood at N9.00 per share as the bank traded 12.642 million shares valued at N112.071 billion in 246 deals.

Fidelity Bank’s share price movement has shown intense volatility in an upward direction over the past years. The stock price has risen from N2.52 on January 04, 2010, to N10.00 on March 15, 2023, generating a YTD return of 297 per cent.
The bank’s market capitalization as of Thursday, April 25, 2024, stood at N288.11 billion. Average volume stood at 11.76 million, share outstanding was 32.01 billion while free float was 31.72 billion

Stakeholders speak
Analysts believe the bank’s share price underlines its earnings growth and financial performance as higher dividend yields and future earnings forecasts have triggered demand in the money lender’s shares.

Over the last ten years, the bank’s share price has risen to a resistance (highest price) of N14.20 on March 05, 2024, and a support price (lowest price) of N0.76 on November 16, 2016.

According to a Lagos-based stockbroker, ‘Fidelity Bank demonstrates the classical admonition to prospective investors of entering low and selling high. Over the last eight years, Fidelity’s stock price has risen by 44.19 per cent on a compound annual basis; very few stocks could prove a better inflation hedge”.

Ambrose Omordion, Chief Research Officer at Investdata Consulting Limited, believes that this is the best time for Fidelity as the bank’s share price is doing well among its peers.

He said, “Fidelity is doing well and its share price is one of the best among its peers. This is so because the bank has recorded impressive results in its 2023 financial year. In June 2023, the bank shares rose by 32 per cent making it the nation’s best-performing bank share as of half year (June 30).

“I can only see a better bank now and in the future. The bank is a potential Tier 1 bank and the performance of the bank is a pointer to the fact that the bank will scale the recapitalisation hurdle of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)”.

Prince Anthony Omojola, National Coordinator, Independent Shareholders Association of Nigeria (ISAN), asserted that “Fidelity Bank is moving up in terms of performance. They have joined those paying interim dividends and they have also dipped their hand into big money tills for huge investment. They have borrowed big to be able to handle bigger contracts and be able to reap big. The reclassification is welcomed and I hope they will not disappoint us. If they can meet expectations, the benefit will be for Nigeria”.

On his part, Sam Ndata, Doyen of Nigerian Stockbrokers and non-executive director at UIDC Securities Limited commented, “This is a good development. If a company performs well, it will surely be rewarded to earn investors’ confidence”.

Mr Boniface Okezie, the National Coordinator, Progressive Shareholders Association of Nigeria, commented, “Fidelity Bank has paid its dues in the financial services sector. It has contributed immensely to the development of the small and medium enterprises (SME) sector yet pays dividends to the shareholders. Last year, it took the market by surprise by declaring a dividend of 50k per share which had not happened in previous years. The massive investment in ICT and effective branch network shows it is ready to serve the customers in a better way and make the shareholders happy.”

Advertisment
Continue Reading

Business

Revealed! How Detained Binance executive planned prison escape

Published

on

Revealed! How Detained Binance executive planned prison escape

 

Advertisment

 

The detained Binance Holdings Limited executive, Tigran Gambaryan, has attempted to escape from Kuje Correctional Facility accordign to a report by the PUNCH.

Advertisment

 

Revealed! How Detained Binance executive planned prison escape

Investigations by their  correspondent revealed how Mr Gambaryan who is currently remanded in Kuje Correctional Facility, applied for a new United States of America passport, under the pretence that his seized passport was missing.

Advertisement

The Armenian-born Binance executive, Gambaryan who has both American and Armenian passports, told the US Embassy in Abuja that he lost his passport which is currently being held by the EFCC, impeccable anti-graft sources privy to the development but not authorised to speak, told The PUNCH on Wednesday.

Following the development, the EFCC has urged the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja to disregard Gambaryan’s bail application, while noting that the Armenian-American could flee from Nigeria like his Kenyan-British colleague, Nadeem Anjarwalla who fled to Kenya.

A source, who is privy to the investigations, revealed that “The second Binance executive, Tigran Gambaryan, who is currently remanded in Kuje prison, has planned to escape from the facility. He applied to the US embassy in Abuja to issue him a new Visa while lying that he lost his passport which was seized by the EFCC.”

Another source, who insisted on anonymity, noted that “Gambaryan could have escaped from Kuje if not for the fact that the US embassy flagged his request for a new passport. Fortunately, the US embassy immediately reached out to the EFFC, and the embassy was informed that he’s a criminal suspect whose case is currently in court for alleged money laundering – concealing the source of the $35,400, 000 generated as revenue by Binance in Nigeria knowing that the funds constituted proceeds of unlawful activity.”

Meanwhile, the EFCC had on Tuesday, urged Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court Abuja to deny Gambaryan’s bail application.

The anti-graft agency said it was too risky to admit the foreigner to bail, noting the escape of his co-defendant, Nadeem Anjarwalla, from the custody of the National Security Adviser and his escape to Kenya.

Besides, the prosecuting counsel for the EFCC, Ekele Iheanacho, told the court that the anti-graft agency uncovered an alleged plot by Gambaryan to obtain a new passport to facilitate his escape from Nigeria after the EFCC had seized his passport.

Gambaryan, his fleeing colleague, Anjarwalla, and Binance Holdings Limited are being prosecuted by the EFCC on money laundering charges.

The anti-graft agency accused them of concealing the source of the $35,400, 000 generated as revenue by Binance in Nigeria knowing that the funds constituted proceeds of unlawful activity.

Opposing Gambaryan’s bail application on Tuesday, the EFCC prosecutor said, “There was an attempt by this defendant to procure another travelling document even when he was aware that his passport was in the custody of the state. He pretended as if the said passport was stolen.”

Iheanacho told the court that within the same period that Anjarwalla fled the custody, Gambaryan also allegedly made moves to escape from custody and flee the country but was intercepted by the operatives of the commission.

“This court will be taking a grave risk to grant the defendant bail. This is also because he has no attachment to any community in Nigeria.
“The experience we have had with the man who escaped to Kenya while his United Kingdom passport is in Nigeria will certainly repeat itself if this defendant is granted bail.

“The 1st defendant (Binance) is operating virtually. The only thing we have to hold on to is this defendant. So, we pray My Lord to refuse bail to the defendant.”

Iheanacho said with the intelligence information at the EFCC’s disposal it was not safe to release the foreigner on bail.

Advertisment
Continue Reading

Business

Dana Airline: How Long Should We Pamper Death? …Why FG should completely ban Dana Airline from flights operations ~By Oluwaseun Fabiyi

Published

on

Dana Airline: How Long Should We Pamper Death? ...Why FG should completely ban Dana Airline from flights operations ~By Oluwaseun Fabiyi

Dana Airline: How Long Should We Pamper Death?
…Why FG should completely ban Dana Airline from flights operations
~By Oluwaseun Fabiyi

 

Advertisment

 

Every means of transportation poses its own risk and hazards, however, some pose graver risk, especially when the right steps are not taken in the right direction. The fear and the attendant disaster that comes with air crashes are graver than one could imagine. This is why all must be adequately put in place, to avoid unnecessary distrust.

Advertisment

 

Dana Airline: How Long Should We Pamper Death?
...Why FG should completely ban Dana Airline from flights operations
~By Oluwaseun Fabiyi

It is no longer news that Dana Airlines experienced yet another flight mishap recently, when one of its aircrafts; with registration number 5N BKI skidded off the runway, at the Murtala Muhammed International airport in Lagos, on Tuesday 23rd of April, 2024, after reportedly returning from Abuja that fateful morning. To say that, the incident was a serious safety concern and threat; that requires swift response, is to say the least.

Advertisement

One must commend the Honourable Minister Of Aviation and Aerospace Development, for his promptness in grounding all Dana Air’s operations within the country. Such should be the alacrity of nations, who have zest and intelligence for the safety of her citizens.

Without much ado, Many Nigerians must have come to a point where they doubt the integrity and technological reliability of Dana Airlines. This is not farfetched from the lackadaisical attitude of the air operator, and certain antecedents that say no otherwise.

Let me take you just a little down the memory lane! Bethnews Media can still recall very vividly, how Dana Airlines wrecked a gruesome havoc on my neighbourhood some 13 years ago,when one of its aircrafts crashed, around Toyin/Balogun Iju-Road claiming the lives of One Hundred And Fifty-nine (159) persons and destroying several persons homes and means of livelihood.

On that fateful Sunday afternoon of June 3, 2012, at about 2:00pm. Publiser of BethNews Media, Oluwaseun Fabiyi had just returned from church, and because of the hot weather, I sat at the balcony after my meal, only to see an aircraft that swung across my rooftop, as if to perch on it. Gripped with fear, since we had never seen a plane flown so low in our area, we decided to follow up.

Myself and others understood that, all was not well the the aircraft that just past, especially seeing it with that very black fume, and preceded by a very scary screeching and deadly roar. Before we could say Jack Robinson, it happened, a Dana Airlines aircraft had just crashed! Everywhere around Toyin Balogun street, off Iju Ishaga road, was already in disarray. Everyone scampered for safety in the unfortunate community.

When an occurrence of this magnitude occurs, sometimes it is excusable to attribute it unforeseen hitch(es), however, such excuses are hardly tenable in airspace operations, since most of the flight activities are strictly monitored via utmost sophistication and near-perfect technical accuracy.

Few months after the Lagos state government had organised a mass burial for the victims of the unfortunate controversial Dana air mishap,the operator was suspended, and directed to show kind gestures to families and businesses affected.

Guess what! Dana Airlines is alleged to have refused, to show concerns, nor put any mechanism in place, to alleviate the sufferings of those who lost lives, properties and millions to the crash. Rather, they clamoured to resume operations.

Surprisingly but not strangely, Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) heeded Dana Airlines’ plea,to resume operations. Nigerians must understand and also remember that, the Dana air crash of 3rd June, 2012 remains the deadliest; after that of 1973,where 193 died in Kano.

Imagine what would have happened again, if the last incident resulted in a crash aground or mid air. God forbids, like we always say in Nigeria’s parlance! However, the reality is that, God wouldn’t forbid, if we leave what God has given us abilities to avert back to God. It doesn’t work that way!

As a matter of urgency, Dana Airline needs to be completely ban from flights operations, since crashes and air mishaps are becoming regular and normal occurrence in their services to Nigerians. We can’t continue to handle the safety of the populace with laxity and levity.

As far as I and many Nigerians are concerned,if the authorities involved continue to play politics, Dana Airline would continue to underestimate Nigerians for long, and the outside world wouldn’t take us seriously.

Advertisment
Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending