Connect with us

society

Bello Vs EFCC: Court to rule on admissibility of FCT Court judgment on school fees payment May 8

Published

on

Court rejects EFCC's request to arraign Yahaya Bello without his counsel, adjourns to Dec 13 Ex-Gov to remain in custody

Bello Vs EFCC: Court to rule on admissibility of FCT Court judgment on school fees payment May 8

 

The Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed May 8 for ruling on the admissibility of a judgment of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in suit number FCT/HC/CV/2574/2023 between Mr Ali Bello and Incorporated Trustees of American International School.

 

The Defendant’s Counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, had, before proceeding on cross-examination of the EFCC’s third witness, Nicholas Ohehomon, from AISA, sought to tender the document, which had decided on the issue of payment of fees or refund in the ongoing case instituted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission against the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

The Defence Counsel had also sought to tender the receipts of the recertification of the said documents.

But Pinherio, SAN, who had earlier examined the witness, objected, saying that the Prosecution had not yet closed its case.

He argued that the defendant could not tender documents at a time the prosecution was still proving its case, citing Section 232 of the Evidence Act.

Reacting, Daudu SAN said, “My lord, the admissibility of documents in criminal or civil cases is governed strictly and exclusively by the principles of relevance to the proceedings at hand.

“Once it is adjudged, we submit that the document is relevant, it becomes automatically admissible. That is what is contained in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Evidence Act, 2011.

“The question for your lordship is, is this document relevant and admissible in line with Section 4? The answer has been provided by my learned brother silk for the prosecution.

“He referred to the content of the judgment and read out a portion which says that a particular relief was refused and that the fee agreement was upheld in the same judgment.”

He said the public documents they sought to tender had AISA as a party and that, as far as the defendant was concerned, the witness was the sole witness of AISA in the matter.
The Defence Counsel added that the objection of the prosecution was speculative because “he does not know what we want to do with the record yet.”

“Because he (Pinhero SAN) is not comfortable with the document does not stop its admissibility,” he added.

Pinherio, however, urged the court to reject the document, arguing that the Defence Counsel had not demonstrated that it comes within the ambit of Section 232 of the Evidence Act.

Justice Emeka Nwite, therefore, held that a date would be given for ruling on the admissibility of the FCT High Court judgment.

He adjourned the case to May 8 and 9, for ruling on the admissibility and for continuation of trial.

Earlier, when trial resumed on Friday, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, asked the Registrar to give the witness, Nicholas Ohehomon, Exhibit 13P1.

The witness identified the exhibit as a telex from the bank sent to the school via email by Ali Bello.

The witness was also told to identify Exhibits 13P2 to 13P4 and she confirmed that they were transfers made by Forza Oil and Gas in favour of the respective children.

He identified Exhibit 13P5, a telex by Whales Oil and Gas to American International School as well as others.

During examination, EFCC Counsel asked the witness to tell the court in whose names four of the payment receipts were issued.

He said they were issued in the names of four children of the former governor, after being prompted by the Prosecution Counsel.

The Defence Counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, cut in, saying that the witness should read the names on the receipt.

“My lord, he (Pinhero, SAN) is demonstrating this document. The witness cannot import or infer into the Exhibit what is not there,” he stated.

Meanwhile, the Defence Counsel could not proceed with his cross-examination because the Judge had to adjourn for ruling on the admissibility of an earlier judgment of the FCT High Court on the issue of payments of school fees.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

society

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE REIGNING MONARCH OF THE UKA / DIAMOND CASTLE PALACE, EMPEROR SOLOMON WINING U

Published

on

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM THE OFFICE OF THE REIGNING MONARCH OF THE UKA / DIAMOND CASTLE PALACE, EMPEROR SOLOMON WINING U.

 

We are pleased to announce the official appointment of the attached Kings and Queen of the UKA in the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Imperial House of Glodeni Medieval and Cultural Clans of the Noble Families in Lebanon.

Please, join us in congratulating these Great Fellows on their commitment and selfless contributions in liberating humanity at all costs.

This Royal Appointment will guarantee them enormous access to the UKA projects and programs across their various jurisdictions.

Please, kindly accept our heartfelt congratulations in your new Royal Office And hopefully, we believe that, all of you shall deliver all that is expected in order to rule while protecting the Royal Crown.

And again, we pray for divine wisdom, good health, and more Spiritual Enlightenment Rule as directed by the Reigning Monarch of the UKA and Attica Empire’s Queen.

God bless us all… Amen!

L.C. Amb. Collins O. Peter
For: The Royal Diamond Castle Palace & Empires Worldwide.

Continue Reading

society

You Can Never Find Justice Where Criminals Make Rules: A Case Study of the Nigerian Senate. by Dare ADELEKAN

Published

on

You Can Never Find Justice Where Criminals Make Rules: A Case Study of the Nigerian Senate. by Dare ADELEKAN

 

Introduction
Justice and governance are two pillars of any functional democracy. The legislature, especially the Senate, plays a crucial role in lawmaking, oversight, and ensuring accountability in government. However, when individuals with questionable integrity dominate this institution, justice becomes elusive, and the very essence of democracy is compromised.

The Nigerian Senate, like many legislative bodies worldwide, is expected to uphold the constitution and represent the interests of the people. Yet, over the years, it has become a refuge for individuals with criminal records, corruption allegations, and financial scandals. This article examines how the presence of such figures in the Nigerian Senate undermines justice, weakens governance, and threatens the country’s democratic foundation.

 

1. The Nigerian Senate: A House of Law or a Safe Haven for the Corrupt?
The Senate, as the upper chamber of Nigeria’s National Assembly, is responsible for making laws, approving budgets, confirming appointments, and providing checks and balances to the executive arm of government. Ideally, it should be occupied by distinguished, law-abiding individuals who put national interest above personal gain. However, in reality, the Nigerian Senate has become a sanctuary for former governors, politicians, and businessmen seeking to evade prosecution for corruption and abuse of office.

 

Many former governors accused of misappropriating public funds have found solace in the Senate, leveraging their legislative immunity and influence to shield themselves from accountability. The irony is glaring: the very institution meant to uphold justice has become a tool for subverting it.

 

2. Criminal Elements in the Senate: A Disturbing Trend
Several Nigerian senators have faced allegations ranging from financial misappropriation to fraud and even criminal conspiracy. Some were under investigation before they got elected, while others successfully maneuvered legal loopholes to evade justice.

Examples of High-Profile Allegations:
Former Governors Turned Senators – Many former governors who left office with corruption cases hanging over them have transitioned seamlessly into senatorial positions. These individuals use their legislative influence to frustrate ongoing investigations and, in some cases, secure favorable judicial rulings.
Senators Facing Corruption Charges – There have been instances where serving senators have been accused of financial crimes, yet they continue to hold office and even preside over committees responsible for oversight of anti-corruption agencies.
The Use of Legislative Power to Evade Prosecution – In Nigeria, there have been cases where sitting senators facing corruption charges successfully lobbied for reduced sentences, plea bargains, or outright dismissal of cases against them.
The presence of such individuals in the Senate raises a fundamental question: Can justice prevail in a system where those making the laws have a vested interest in subverting them?

3. How Corrupt Legislators Undermine Governance and Justice
When individuals with tainted records dominate the Senate, the consequences for governance and justice are far-reaching. Some of these include:

a. Passage of Self-Serving Laws
Rather than enacting policies that serve the people, corrupt senators prioritize laws that protect their personal interests. For instance, efforts to pass stricter anti-corruption laws are often met with resistance from legislators who fear that such measures could expose them to prosecution.

b. Blocking Anti-Corruption Reforms
Senators accused of corruption have been known to sabotage the confirmation of key appointments in anti-corruption agencies, such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC). By doing so, they ensure that these agencies remain weak and ineffective.

c. Weakening Investigative and Oversight Functions
One of the Senate’s critical roles is to conduct oversight on government activities. However, when those responsible for oversight are themselves implicated in corruption, there is little incentive to hold others accountable. As a result, investigative committees become mere formalities, with no real intention of exposing wrongdoing.

d. Loss of Public Trust in Governance
Perhaps the most damaging effect of having corrupt individuals in the Senate is the erosion of public trust. When citizens perceive that their lawmakers are criminals in disguise, faith in democratic institutions declines, leading to voter apathy and political disengagement.

4. The Consequences for Nigeria’s Democracy
The presence of criminal elements in the Senate does not just affect governance; it threatens the very fabric of Nigeria’s democracy. Some of the long-term effects include:

Institutional Decay: When justice is compromised at the legislative level, it weakens the judiciary and other institutions meant to uphold the rule of law.
Economic Decline: Corrupt legislative practices discourage foreign investment, as investors prefer economies with strong governance structures.
Political Instability: When people lose confidence in their leaders, the likelihood of protests, civil unrest, and agitation for radical political change increases.
If Nigeria is to strengthen its democracy, urgent steps must be taken to cleanse the Senate of corrupt elements and restore its integrity.

5. The Way Forward: Restoring the Integrity of the Senate
To prevent the Nigerian Senate from continuing as a safe haven for corrupt politicians, the following reforms must be implemented:

a. Electoral Reforms
Stricter eligibility criteria should be enforced to ensure that individuals with pending corruption cases cannot contest for Senate seats.
Independent and transparent electoral bodies must be empowered to prevent the manipulation of the election process.
b. Judicial Independence and Swift Prosecution
The judiciary must be free from political interference to ensure that cases against corrupt politicians are pursued to a logical conclusion.
Special anti-corruption courts should be established to fast-track cases involving politicians.
c. Legislative Accountability
Stronger internal disciplinary mechanisms should be put in place to hold senators accountable for unethical behavior.
Civil society organizations and the media must continue to expose and monitor legislative misconduct.
d. Public Awareness and Participation
Citizens must actively engage in the democratic process, holding their representatives accountable through advocacy, protests, and voting.
Increased political education will help the electorate make informed decisions, reducing the chances of electing corrupt individuals.
Conclusion
Justice cannot thrive in an environment where lawmakers are themselves beneficiaries of injustice. The Nigerian Senate, which should be a beacon of integrity and national progress, has, unfortunately, become a refuge for individuals seeking to escape accountability.

For Nigeria to move forward, decisive action must be taken to rid the Senate of criminal elements and restore the dignity of its legislative processes. Only then can the principles of justice, fairness, and good governance prevail.

It is time for Nigerians to demand a Senate that truly represents the people—not a gathering of individuals seeking power for personal protection. If the country is to achieve meaningful progress, the people must reject corruption at the ballot box and insist on leaders with integrity, vision, and a genuine commitment to national development.

The future of Nigeria depends on it.

Continue Reading

society

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of $1.4m Linked to Emefiele, Ex-CBN Gov

Published

on

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of $1.4m Linked to Emefiele, Ex-CBN Gov

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of $1.4m Linked to Emefiele, Ex-CBN Gov

 

Justice Ayokunle Faji of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, on Thursday, March 6, 2025, ordered the final forfeiture of $1,426,175.14 (One Million, Four Hundred and Twenty Six Thousand, One Hundred and Seventy Five United States Dollars, Fourteen cents)  linked to a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, Godwin Emefiele.

The order followed a motion filed by the respondent seeking to set aside the court’s final forfeiture order of June 25, 2024.

The court had given the final forfeiture order after a motion on notice filed and argued by Bilkisu Buhari, counsel for the EFCC, which went uncontested by any interested parties.

The motion was supported by an affidavit deposed to by David Jayeoba, an investigating officer with the EFCC who stated that investigation carried out showed that the fund was reasonably suspected to be proceed of unlawful activities “warehoused” in Donatone Limited’s  (DL)’s Titan Trust Bank account.

He stated thus: “The investigation traced the funds to having been fixed into interest-yielding accounts, dissipated and laundered through a foreign account in Mauritius, and transported back to Nigeria under disguise.

“Of the total sum of $26,552,000.00 USD received by the firm, the balance standing in the said account as of today is the sum of $1,426,175.14 million USD.

“It is the balance in the account that the applicant seeks to forfeit to the Federal Government of Nigeria, which has been traced to be the proceeds of unlawful activities of erstwhile Central Bank Governor of Nigeria, Mr. Godwin Emefiele and his cronies.

“Investigation further revealed that the international entities sourcing for forex were pressured into parting with huge funds to access forex during the period.

“The signatories to the account warehousing the sum of $1,426,175.14 USD sought to be forfeited are at large and are making frantic efforts to dissipate the funds electronically.”

Subsequently, the court granted the order.

However, in a counter-affidavit by solicitors for Donatone Limited dated November 25, 2024, they argued that the depositions contained in paragraphs four to 18 of the affidavit deposed to by Jayeoba were not correct.

Responding to the counter-affidavit, the EFCC in an affidavit dated November 29, 2024 countered their claim with more evidence.

Subsequently, Justice Faji held that: “Anyone laying claims to the fund, must show the lawfulness of the acquisition and not that the said fund is not proceeds of crime.

“Having listened to the submission of the applicant’s counsel and also perused the motion just moved, together with the affidavit in support, the motion is hereby granted.”

Consequently, Justice Faji granted the application for final forfeiture of the fund

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending