Connect with us

society

Industrialists begs Tinubu over destruction of his company by Banks,other to intervene By Ifeoma Ikem

Published

on

 

Industrialists begs Tinubu over destruction of his company by Banks,other to intervene

By Ifeoma Ikem

 

 

An industrialist, Chief Executive Officer of Algrain Foods Limited, Chief Anthony Obidulu has called on President Bola Tinubu, the Senate President, Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwu-Olu and other well meaning Nigerians to save indigenous entrepreneurs and industrialists from what he described as the “crookedness with which some commercial banks manipulate accounting books relating to loans in a manner that cripple businesses in the country to the great advantage of banks.”

 

Industrialists begs Tinubu over destruction of his company by Banks,other to intervene

By Ifeoma Ikem

 

Addressing journalists in Lagos during a press briefing, Obidulu said he had been running the food company with about 300 direct employees and over 2800 indirect personnel who were deriving their means of livelihood from the company before the company got involved in a criminally orchestrated seizure by the First City Monument Bank and its collaborators with a view to destroying it.

Taking journalists round the multibillion naira production complex located in Canal Estate in Okota area of Lagos, he disclosed that all the assets of the company worth not less than N20billion had been criminally carted away by agents of the FCMB in the guise of carrying out a court judgment that was dubiously procured.
According to him,“Our company is one of the beneficiaries of the Federal Government’s intervention loans tagged Small and Medium Enterprises Credit Guarantee Scheme (SMECGS) in 2011.

We got a N100 million of the intervention fund through the bank (FCMB) because one of the conditions for getting the  fund was that one must go through a commercial bank to access it. So we opened an account with the bank,from where the fund was accessed. But unfortunately,as the CEO what I personally thought would boost our business and increase the company’s economic base, turned out to be one of our worst economic decisions as a businessman.

“The N100 million was guaranteed by the Federal Government of Nigeria to the tune of 80% (Principal and interest) and tenure of 60 months with12months moratorium. Final date of repayment ought to be November, 2016 in respect of which the Central Bank of Nigeria issued a Guarantee Certificate to First City Monument Bank Plc.dated 15th March,2012 containing the afore-mentioned terms which the Bank concealed from the Federal High Court in securing the judgment they are peddling around.”

Pointing that “the action of the bank became a nightmare which has crippled our business since 2017 and continuing. The bank, cooked up some fictitious figures, and alleged that we owed about N350 million.They went to court behind us,procured an order to take over the company and eventually sealed the company.

As at the time they went to court, we had only touched the Federal Government’s money, not the bank’s money.The offer letter that has not been drawn down is what they relied on to convince the court that our company owed them. The judge did not look at the drawdown, while looking at the offer letter, and he gave the judgment without telling them how much money they can recover from Algrain Foods Limited, thereby giving them an open ticket that has led to the looting that has taken place in the factory as moveable assets worth over N20billion (Twenty Billion Naira) have been stolen from the factory with the aid of Mobile Policemen illegally procured from Mopol 20, Ikeja, Lagos.

“Drawdown means you have touched the money. For example, they gave you N100 million, you withdrew N80 million, and then, N20 million remains with the bank and attracts no interest. So,they used the offer letter and other manipulations to go to court. They had no right in the first place to enforce the loan which was not even due for repayment as at the time they appointed the Receiver/Manager  because it has a tenure of 60 months,with 12 months moratorium.

“Final payment was to be due in November, 2016 (5th year anniversary of the facility). In fact the SMECGS guidelines issued by the Central Bank of Nigeria talks of 8 years tenure; it was an intervention fund for Small and medium enterprises engaged in the Agriculture value chain.We did not take any loan from the FCMB because there was no drawdown even on their own N205million (Two Hundred and Five Million Naira, they encouraged us to take in case of financial emergency. Neither was any such money utilized by our company If they claim otherwise, let the bank show any application to utilize this sum of money by Algrain Foods Limited,” he stated.

“Having played a fast one on our company by the bank (due to my absence from the country as I was overseas attending a conference) which has now taken over the company, we did not know what to do and where to start. In this desperation, after three months, we initially offered to give the bank N150 million so that the company could be re-opened temporarily.They said we should put it in writing and we did but they did not accept it. We wanted to use that period to study the documents they presented to the court to really understand what actually happened, but the bank demanded N450 million. It was at this point we assembled a team of experts in accounting, auditing and banking, as well as legal experts to assist us fight the legal battle that was imminent.

“Regrettably, the first thing the bank did was to overwhelm our team in a manner that created some ambiguity. The team reported that the bank was wrong to have said we owed them N350 million but rather said what we owed was N280 million. As the CEO of the company, I personally began to suspect that something was wrong and I used my contact to find out exactly what was happening. I got answers that confirmed my suspicion. So, we disbanded that team and set up a new team of lawyers, accountants, auditors and ex-bankers. We set up four accounting around the world, one in Toronto, Canada, one in Holland, another one in Enugu, and the fourth one was in Lagos. After two weeks of painstakingly looking into the books, the account was negative indicating that we were not owning the commercial bank.”

According to Obidulu, it is quite unimaginable how FCMB and its collaborators could get a court judgment that purportedly gave out a company with assets worth over N20billion to a receiver/manager Mr. Emmanuel Adeyeye Oyebanji (Senior Advocate of Nigeria)  for an alleged debt of N350million.  Shockingly and surprisingly, the assets had been sold to a foreign company which was in competition. “It is disheartening to say that a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Emmanuel Oyebanji,   was appointed as Receiver/Manager by CSL Trustees Limited on behalf of First City Monument Bank (FCMB) when issues revolving around the disputed N350million loan had not been resolved.  The Receiver Manager has converted, and sold assets worth about N20 billion belonging to our company Algrain Foods Limited- located at 15/17, Canal Avenue, Canal Estate, Okota, Lagos.”

Further, he asked “how can a judge give order that they should go and sell our company without ascertaining how much we owed.   It was wrong to do so.  That kind of judgment is what has killed many Nigerian businessmen.  However, the Appeal Court ruling of 5th December, 2023 proved that the Judiciary can live up to expectation if the will is there as they permitted us to present the concealed document before the Court to determine the pending appeals. The document they concealed was what the judges relied on. The statement in the judgment said, ‘If the judge in the lower court had seen that document, he would not have given them that judgment meaning the judgment that empowered them to seal off my company was wrong.  One of the ongoing appeals now in the court by Algrain Foods Limited is for the Court to give limitation order on what can be sold from the company, assuming the alleged N350million indebtedness is proved beyond any doubt.

Speaking on First Bank’s involvement, the Algrains boss said “the FCMB having seen that we were fighting back, involved First Bank of Nigeria which our company had a business dealing with, in the past to join forces to fight us. The two banks collaborated to put pressure on me that that our company owed them. The official from the First Bank was in my place several times looking for something to rope our company in.  He had brought one programme and said they would give us N50 million in Dangote Flour line, to be repaid at every 60 days interval without interest. And we will put that money towards a flour project.

”We accepted and decided to patronise them. They disbursed N40million worth of flour and before they took our company, we had paid N27 million, remaining N13million out of which we had placed order for N4million worth of flour not supplied before the closure of the company.  But the First Bank of Nigeria joined FCMB to take over the company. They came under N13 million to seal the place but when they wrote us, they said we owed them N155 million.   When the books were dissected, we found out that we had overpaid them. So, we are in court with them on accusation of fraud.

The industrialist is therefore appealing to the Inspector General of Police to also intervene in the matter as some mobile policemen suspected to have been wrongly engaged in the carting away and sales of the machinery and other movable assets of Algrain Foods Limited (which is located on hectares of land) to a foreign company and other buyers.  On tour of the premises by journalists, it was discovered that apart from the expansive warehouses and spaces that used to house production materials, machines and finished goods, not a single machine, forklift or vehicle was seen.  Over forty trucks and other vehicles belonging to Algrains Food Limited had reportedly been sold by the receiver/manager based on the purported court judgment which has been challenged on appeal.

 

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

society

The Role of Certificate of Occupancy in Property Valuation Method in Nigeria by Dennis Isong

Published

on

The Role of Certificate of Occupancy in Property Valuation Method in Nigeria by Dennis Isong

In Nigeria’s real estate landscape, property valuation serves as a crucial process that determines the worth of a property for various purposes, including buying, selling, and securing loans. One significant document that plays a pivotal role in this process is the Certificate of Occupancy (C of O). This legal document, issued by the state government, confirms an individual’s right to use and occupy land for a specified period.
Understanding the interplay between the C of O and property valuation is essential for investors, developers, and homeowners alike, as it can significantly influence market perceptions and property prices.
Understanding the Certificate of Occupancy
The Certificate of Occupancy is a legal document that signifies ownership and the right to occupy land. In Nigeria, land ownership is primarily governed by statutory laws, customary laws, and the Land Use Act of 1978, which mandates that all land in urban areas is owned by the government. Thus, the issuance of a C of O is necessary to establish a legal claim over any parcel of land.
Obtaining a C of O is a comprehensive process that involves several steps, including land survey, payment of necessary fees, and completion of relevant documentation. Once issued, the C of O provides security to the landowner by guaranteeing their rights against unlawful eviction or encroachment. This security is a significant factor in property valuation. Properties with a valid C of O are generally seen as more valuable and less risky compared to those without, as the certificate signifies legal recognition and ownership rights.
C of O and Market Perception
The presence of a C of O can significantly influence market perception and the demand for a property. Properties with a valid Certificate of Occupancy are typically viewed as more desirable by potential buyers and investors. This perception stems from the legal security that a C of O provides. Buyers are more likely to invest in properties with a C of O because they have assurance that their rights are protected, and the likelihood of disputes regarding ownership is minimized.
Moreover, lenders and financial institutions often require a C of O before approving loans for property purchases or developments. A valid C of O enhances the credibility of the property, making it easier for buyers to secure financing. This accessibility to finance, in turn, can lead to increased property demand, thereby driving up its valuation. Conversely, properties lacking a C of O may be perceived as risky investments, resulting in lower valuations and reduced buyer interest. Thus, the C of O serves as a critical indicator of a property’s reliability and marketability.
C of O in the Property Valuation Process
In the property valuation process, a valuer considers various factors to determine the value of a property. These factors typically include location, size, condition, and comparable sales in the area. However, the existence of a C of O is often a prominent consideration. During the valuation process, valuers will assess the C of O to ascertain the legal standing of the property. A valid C of O not only confirms ownership but also indicates compliance with local land use regulations, zoning laws, and building codes.
Valuers may also take into account the duration of the C of O. In Nigeria, a C of O is usually granted for 99 years, and this long tenure can positively influence a property’s valuation. The security provided by a long-term C of O assures potential buyers of their rights over the property for an extended period, making it a more attractive investment. Conversely, properties without a C of O, or those with expired or disputed certificates, may be valued lower due to the inherent risks associated with such properties.
Furthermore, a C of O can impact future development potential, which is a crucial aspect of property valuation. Properties with a valid C of O are more likely to receive the necessary approvals for development or alteration, while those without may face legal hurdles. This potential for development can enhance the property’s value, as it indicates future income generation possibilities. Consequently, valuers consider the C of O as a critical factor that influences the overall worth of the property in the market.
Challenges and Implications of C of O in Property Valuation
Despite its importance, the C of O is not without challenges. The process of obtaining a C of O can be lengthy and complex, leading to delays in property transactions. In some cases, disputes over land ownership can arise, particularly in areas where customary land tenure systems are prevalent. These disputes can complicate the valuation process, as properties with contentious C of Os may be difficult to sell and consequently valued lower.
Additionally, the presence of a C of O does not automatically guarantee a problem-free investment. Factors such as environmental issues, development restrictions, or changes in land use policies can affect property value. Valuers must therefore conduct thorough due diligence, considering not only the existence of a C of O but also any associated risks or liabilities.
In conclusion, the Certificate of Occupancy plays a crucial role in property valuation methods in Nigeria. As a legal document that signifies ownership and security, it significantly influences market perception and property demand. Valuers must consider the C of O when assessing a property’s value, as it reflects the legal standing and development potential of the land. However, challenges associated with the C of O, such as ownership disputes and regulatory complexities, must also be navigated to ensure accurate valuations. For stakeholders in the Nigerian real estate market, understanding the importance of the C of O is vital for making informed investment decisions and maximizing property value.
Dennis Isong is a TOP REALTOR IN LAGOS.He Helps Nigerians in Diaspora to Own Property In Lagos Nigeria STRESS-FREE. For Questions WhatsApp/Call 2348164741041

Continue Reading

society

From Ankara to Amala: Owambe Party unveils Christmas Edition for party lovers in Lagos

Published

on

From Ankara to Amala: Owambe Party unveils Christmas Edition for party lovers in Lagos

 

Imagine a night where Aso Ebi slays meet twinkling lights, where the beats of Afrobeat and Highlife are spiced with electrifying performances ready to get your hips moving.

Get ready for the biggest and most unbeatable vibes at the 2024 Owambe party happening on the 15th of December 2024! at Amore gardens, Lekki phase1 proudly brought to you by Spotlight by Mmakamba.

The Owambe Party Christmas edition promises a night filled with vibrant entertainment, music, food and jaw dropping fashion with electrifying performances from award winning artists and celebrity DJs that will keep you dancing all night long!

This season’s ultimate turn-up is happening, and you’re invited to soak in the magic of Unbeatable Owambe Party vibes with all the flair and flavor you can handle.

Expect unlimited mouth-watering Jollof rice, smoky suya, and small chops paired with the finest palm wine and cocktails, because no party experience can match the Owambe Party.

Mark your calendars, save the date! December 15th will be a masterpiece!

For inquiries and reservation, follow us on Instagram: @SpotlightByMmakamba and @TheOwambeParty.

Continue Reading

society

Appeal Court Removes MC Oluomo, Reinstate Baruwa

Published

on

Appeal Court Removes MC Olumo, Reinstate Baruwa

Appeal Court Removes MC Oluomo, Reinstate Baruwa

 

 

The Appeal Court in Abuja has announced Alhaji Tajudeen Ibikunle Baruwa as the lawful President of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW).

Appeal Court Removes MC Olumo, Reinstate Baruwa

It can be recalled that Musiliu Ayinde Akinsanya, popularly known as MC Oluomo, was days ago inaugurated as NURTW president.

The recent decision came after the court reviewed and upheld an earlier ruling by the National Industrial Court.

The initial judgment, delivered on March 11, 2024, recognized Baruwa as the rightful president of the union. However, an appeal was filed by Alhaji Najeem Usman Yasin, Alhaji Tajudeen Agbede, and their supporters. They argued against the Industrial Court’s decision but were unsuccessful in convincing the appellate court.

A three-member panel of justices, Hamma Akawu Barka, Nnamdi Dimgba, and Asmau Ojuolape Akanbi, ruled that the appeal lacked merit. The court declared Baruwa as the elected leader of NURTW and dismissed the challenge brought forward by MC Oluomo’s faction.

In addition to confirming Baruwa’s position, the Appeal Court ordered the appellants, who are supporters of MC Oluomo, to pay N100,000 as damages to the respondents.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending