Connect with us

society

NADECO Chieftain Blasts Babangida: ‘Shameless, Unremorseful Over June 12 Annulment’

Published

on

NADECO Chieftain Blasts Babangida: ‘Shameless, Unremorseful Over June 12 Annulment’

NADECO Chieftain Blasts Babangida: ‘Shameless, Unremorseful Over June 12 Annulment’

A chieftain of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), Ayo Opadokun, has launched a scathing attack on former Head of State, General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida (IBB), over his recent admission of wrongfully annulling the June 12, 1993, presidential election. Opadokun labeled Babangida’s so-called confession as pretentious, dubious, and devoid of any genuine remorse.

Babangida, in his newly released 420-page autobiography, Journey in Service, acknowledged the annulment of the historic election, which was widely believed to have been won by Chief MKO Abiola. However, Opadokun dismissed the admission as a desperate attempt at revisionism, accusing the former military ruler of seeking to manipulate history rather than confront his role in one of Nigeria’s darkest political betrayals.

‘Babangida is Dancing on the Graves of Innocent Nigerians’

Speaking on Wednesday, Opadokun did not mince words, condemning Babangida for what he described as shameless posturing and a calculated effort to rewrite history.

“The so-called admission is not only pretentious, but it is also deeply dubious and entirely lacking in remorse. In his 420-page book, General IBB engages primarily in revisionism, obscurism, and escapism. He has not disclosed anything new,” Opadokun declared.

Beyond the annulment itself, the NADECO leader lashed out at Babangida for showing no remorse for the bloodshed and national chaos that followed his decision. He accused the former dictator of “dancing on the graves of innocent martyrs” who died fighting for democracy.

“He is shamelessly dancing on the graves of innocent Nigerians who were killed simply so he, a military dictator, could cling to power and continue looting public funds for himself, his family, and his allies,” Opadokun fumed.

‘June 12 Bloodshed is on Babangida’s Hands’

Recalling the violent aftermath of the election annulment, Opadokun painted a grim picture of military repression, extrajudicial killings, and state-sponsored violence against pro-democracy activists. He pointed to the assassination of Kudirat Abiola, the widow of the acclaimed election winner, as a chilling example of the brutality that followed Babangida’s decision.

“In Ikorodu, when we attempted to bury three young victims, security forces overpowered us. They ordered us to tell the families to retrieve their loved ones’ remains without any ceremony. They even slapped mourners to silence them,” he recounted, emphasizing the merciless crackdown on dissenters.

Opadokun argued that Babangida should be held accountable for treason, given the far-reaching consequences of his actions. He recalled watching an interview with Professor Humphrey Nwosu, Chairman of the National Electoral Commission (NEC), where Nwosu confirmed that collation had been completed and that Abiola had indisputably won the election—even defeating his opponent, Bashir Tofa, in his home state of Kano.

“There is nothing new in what Babangida has said. It was already public knowledge that Abiola won, as polling unit results were displayed up to the state collation centers. Even his former political adviser, Professor Omo Omoruyi, affirmed this in his own book,” Opadokun added.

‘Babangida’s Betrayal Will Never Be Forgiven’

Opadokun went further to blame Nigeria’s stagnation on prolonged military rule, stating that the military’s intervention in politics—beginning with the January 15, 1966 coup—marked the country’s decline.

“The military’s reckless interference has stunted Nigeria’s growth. Their forceful takeover in 1966 arrested our national development and reduced us to nothing,” he lamented.

Rejecting any notion that Babangida’s admission could lead to reconciliation, Opadokun insisted that the former dictator remains morally culpable for the lives lost in the aftermath of June 12.

“Too many lives were lost because of him. Too much blood is on his hands, yet he still pretends to be a statesman,” he said.

Concluding, Opadokun declared that Babangida’s legacy will forever be tainted by the annulment of Nigeria’s freest and fairest election, and that his latest remarks were nothing more than a failed attempt to sanitize his image.

“History will not absolve Babangida. He stole democracy from Nigerians and plunged the nation into darkness. No amount of revisionism can change that,” Opadokun asserted.

society

Governor Dauda Lawal Approves 120-Day Rapid Intervention Plan to Revamp Zamfara’s Educational Sector

Published

on

Governor Dauda Lawal Approves 120-Day Rapid Intervention Plan to Revamp Zamfara’s Educational Sector

 

Governor Dauda Lawal has approved a 120-day Rapid Intervention Action Plan aimed at addressing systemic failures in Zamfara State’s education sector.

 

The Governor presided over the State Executive Council meeting on Monday at the Government House in Gusau, where key decisions were taken.

 

During deliberations at the 65th Council meeting, issues related to education, health, works, and other sectors were discussed and approved.

 

The Council endorsed a 120-day rapid intervention plan built on prior diagnostic activities conducted by the Ministry of Education and the Education Quality Assurance Agency (EQAA). The plan, presented by the overseeing Commissioner for Education, Abdulmalik Abubakar Gajam, includes payroll audits, school mapping exercises, and infrastructure assessments. It proposes targeted, time-bound interventions across governance, infrastructure, digital transformation, teacher development, and student welfare.

 

The Council also approved the formation of a joint committee to immediately assess all illegal or unapproved structures built around schools in the state, with a view to relocating them and securing school environments. The committee will be led by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MOEST).

 

Additionally, the Council approved a single, unified Education Sector Bill (covering Early Childhood Care Development Education to Tertiary level), to be developed in consultation with stakeholders including agencies, institutions, civil society, traditional rulers, and development partners. A draft bill will be presented to the State House of Assembly for enactment within the emergency timeframe.

 

The Governor further approved the transfer of non-teaching staff—such as messengers, labourers, gardeners, cooks, guards, drivers, health workers, and artisans—from the Ministry’s payroll to appropriate MDAs (CPG, MoH, Establishment) or private firms.

 

Among other important issues, the Council approved the composition of the Zamfara State Steering Committee on the State of Emergency on Education and authorised the Committee to constitute a Technical Working Group (TWG) and co-opt stakeholders including the NUT, UNICEF, UBEC, traditional and religious leaders, private school proprietors, and CSOs.

Continue Reading

society

You Cannot Fight Terrorism with Naivety: A Response to Senator Lawan

Published

on

You Cannot Fight Terrorism with Naivety: A Response to Senator Lawan

By Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi.

I have read with deep concern—and frankly, disappointment—the statement issued by Ahmad Ibrahim Lawan regarding the military airstrike in Jilli Futchimiram, Geidam Local Government Area of Yobe State.

At a time when Nigeria is fighting for its very survival against a ruthless insurgency, it is alarming that senior political figures would rush to amplify a one-sided narrative that risks undermining the morale, credibility, and operational effectiveness of our armed forces.

Let us be clear: this is not a conventional war. This is a brutal, asymmetric conflict against Boko Haram—an enemy that has no respect for human life, no regard for international law, and no hesitation in embedding itself within civilian populations and economic structures.

The Jilli axis, spanning parts of Yobe State and Borno State, is not some unknown, innocent marketplace operating in isolation. It has long been identified—by locals, security observers, and intelligence—as a corridor where stolen livestock and critical supplies are traded, feeding the very insurgency that has devastated our nation.

To ignore this reality is not compassion—it is willful blindness.

Statements that paint such environments purely as civilian spaces, without acknowledging their exploitation by terrorists, distort the truth and dangerously oversimplify a deeply complex security challenge. They create the false impression that our military is acting recklessly, when in fact they are navigating one of the most difficult combat environments in modern warfare.

How many soldiers must die before we begin to speak honestly?

Our troops have been ambushed, slaughtered, and buried in silence while defending communities from terror. These are human beings with families, with lives, with futures that are cut short in the line of duty. Yet, too often, their sacrifices are met not with unwavering support, but with premature accusations and politically convenient outrage.

This must stop.

No serious nation at war allows ambiguity about where it stands. Terrorism does not survive on ideology alone—it survives on networks: supply chains, informants, collaborators, and economic enablers. Any location that becomes part of that ecosystem—knowingly or otherwise—enters a dangerous space within the conflict.

This is the hard truth many are unwilling to say.

Nigeria cannot afford a narrative that shields the mechanisms of terrorism while scrutinizing only the actions of those fighting it. That imbalance is not neutrality—it is complicity by omission.

This is not a call for recklessness. It is a call for clarity, courage, and national resolve.

Yes, the military must remain professional. Yes, accountability matters. But accountability must not become a weapon used to weaken our defenses while terrorists adapt, regroup, and exploit our divisions.

The question before us is simple:
Are we truly committed to ending this insurgency, or are we going to continue sanitizing the uncomfortable realities that sustain it?

History will not judge us by the statements we release, but by whether we had the courage to confront the truth and stand firmly behind those risking their lives to defend this country.

Nigeria must choose strength over sentiment, clarity over convenience, and victory over denial.

Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi.

Convener: Coalition of Civil Society Groups Against Terrorism in Nigeria.

 

Continue Reading

society

Kogi Youths Rise in Protest, Allege Political Persecution Against Amupitan

Published

on

Kogi Youths Rise in Protest, Allege Political Persecution Against Amupitan

 

AIYETORO GBEDE, KOGI — Hundreds of youths in Aiyetoro Gbede, Ijumu Local Government Area of Kogi State, on Monday staged a protest over what they described as a politically motivated attempt to undermine the leadership of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

 

The demonstrators, drawn from various youth and civil society groups, marched through major streets of the community, voicing strong support for the independence of the electoral body and expressing confidence in Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and INEC National Commissioner-nominee.

 

Carrying placards with inscriptions such as “Enemies of Fairness, Beware!” and “Fair Elections Start with Amupitan,” the protesters insisted that recent claims and rumours circulating on social media were part of a broader agenda to discredit the electoral system.

 

The protest featured a large procession of youths on motorcycles and on foot, drawing attention from residents as participants chanted solidarity songs and called for the protection of democratic institutions.
Speaking during the demonstration, a youth leader identified as Segun said the group would resist any attempt to “blackmail” or weaken the electoral body.

Kogi Youths Rise in Protest, Allege Political Persecution Against Amupitan

“We are here to send a clear message: the sanctity of INEC must be preserved. Prof. Amupitan is a man of integrity and a proud son of this land. Any attempt to malign his character or remove him unjustly is an attack on democracy,” he said.

 

The protest comes amid ongoing national debates over the appointment of new INEC National Commissioners, with some civil society organisations and opposition voices raising concerns about alleged political affiliations of certain nominees.

 

However, the Kogi youths dismissed such allegations as “sponsored propaganda,” arguing that Amupitan’s professional record and legal expertise position him to strengthen the credibility of the commission and ensure transparent electoral processes.

 

Meanwhile, INEC has rejected calls for the removal of its chairman, describing such demands as unconstitutional and a threat to the independence of the electoral body.

In a statement issued in Abuja and signed by Chief Press Secretary to the Chairman, Adedayo Oketola, the Commission stressed that its leadership is governed strictly by constitutional provisions, particularly Section 157 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which outlines the process for appointment and removal.

 

The Commission explained that its recent actions, including compliance with court rulings and decisions relating to party activities, were guided by the rule of law and aimed at safeguarding Nigeria’s democratic framework.

 

INEC also dismissed claims of partisan bias, noting that its recognition of multiple political parties and commitment to electoral transparency contradict allegations of a one-party agenda.

 

On the planned nationwide voter revalidation exercise, the Commission clarified that the initiative is a routine administrative process designed to sanitise the voter register, eliminate irregularities, and enhance the integrity of electoral data.

 

Reaffirming its commitment, INEC stated that it remains focused on delivering free, fair, and credible elections, adding that it would not be distracted by what it described as unfounded allegations.

 

The developments come ahead of key off-cycle elections in Ekiti and Osun states later in the year, as stakeholders continue to scrutinise the electoral body’s actions and leadership.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending