Connect with us

society

Nigeria’s Tragedy of Leadership: Why Bad Governance Refuses to Die. (NIGERIA BLEEDS NOT FROM POVERTY BUT FROM LEADERSHIP FAILURE)

Published

on

Nigeria’s Tragedy of Leadership: Why Bad Governance Refuses to Die. (NIGERIA BLEEDS NOT FROM POVERTY BUT FROM LEADERSHIP FAILURE)

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Sahara Weekly

 

Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country and one of its richest in natural resources, stands today as a paradox: WEALTHY in RESOURCES but IMPOVERISHED in GOVERNANCE. Despite having the continent’s largest economy, abundant crude oil reserves and an intelligent youth population, Nigeria remains crippled by bad governance. The reasons are not HIDDEN; they are VISIBLE, REPEATABLE and PREDICTABLE. Yet, like a nation cursed, Nigeria continues to recycle the same patterns of leadership failure.

The question is simple: Why does bad governance persist in Nigeria despite DECADES of INDEPENDENCE, ABUNDANT TALENT and ENORMOUS OPPORTUNITIES? The answer lies in seven critical realities, each a dagger stabbing at the nation’s future.

1. BLIND LOYALTY and FEAR of CORRECTION.

In most functioning democracies, advisers, ministers and cabinet members serve as checks on executive excesses. In Nigeria, SYCOPHANCY has replaced CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM. Ministers and aides often see themselves not as public servants but as errand boys for the president, governor or local chairman.

The fear of losing political appointments silences voices of truth. Instead of correcting a leader’s mistakes, they applaud them, even when such errors drive the nation deeper into crisis. This culture of blind loyalty perpetuates incompetence.

The late Chinua Achebe, Nigeria’s literary giant, captured it aptly: “THE TROUBLE WITH NIGERIA IS SIMPLY AND SQUARELY A FAILURE OF LEADERSHIP.” Leaders are surrounded by praise singers who lack the courage to tell them hard truths. Without correction, misgovernance festers unchecked.

2. CORRUPTION and SELF-INTEREST.

Corruption remains Nigeria’s biggest albatross. From the first republic till today, it has swallowed billions of dollars meant for hospitals, schools, roads and electricity. Transparency International’s 2023 Corruption Perception Index ranked Nigeria 145th out of 180 countries, a dismal position for Africa’s so-called giant.

Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton once said in Abuja: “The failure of governance in Nigeria is the failure of leadership at every level, and it is fueled by corruption.”

Public office in Nigeria is often treated as a private investment. Politicians view elections as an opportunity to recoup campaign funds and amass wealth. This greed diverts resources from national development into personal pockets. Little wonder why Nigeria, despite earning over $1 trillion from oil exports since the 1970s, still suffers epileptic electricity supply and crumbling infrastructure.

3. WEAK INSTITUTIONS.

Strong institutions (not strong men) sustain democracies. Unfortunately, Nigeria’s judiciary, legislature and anti-corruption agencies are weak, compromised and often controlled by the executive.

The judiciary, meant to be the last hope of the common man, is widely perceived as corrupt. Election tribunals have become markets where judgments are allegedly bought by the highest bidder. Legislators, instead of holding the executive accountable, often bow in submission for political survival or “CONSTITUENCY PROJECTS” padded with corruption.

Political scientist Larry Diamond once warned: “Where institutions are weak, democracy cannot thrive.” Nigeria is living proof of that. Without impartial institutions, leaders operate unchecked, deepening cycles of abuse of power.

4. TRIBALISM, RELIGION and NEPOTISM.

Nigeria’s diversity should be a blessing, but in the hands of selfish leaders, it has become a curse. Appointments are not based on MERIT but on TRIBE, RELIGION and NEPOTISM. This culture sidelines competent technocrats while promoting mediocrity.

President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration (2015–2023) was widely criticized for EXCESSIVE NEPOTISM, with key security and economic positions allegedly dominated by one section of the country. Such lopsidedness fuels resentment, deepens ethnic mistrust and kills the spirit of nationalism.

As former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan once said: “Good governance is perhaps the single most important factor in eradicating poverty and promoting development.” Where leaders choose LOYALTY over COMPETENCE, PROGRESS is IMPOSSIBLE.

5. LACK of CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.

A passive citizenry sustains bad governance. In Nigeria, millions of citizens complain in private but fail to challenge corruption in public. Protests are rare and when they occur, they are often hijacked or crushed by state security forces.

During the #EndSARS protests of 2020, Nigerian youths demonstrated the power of collective action against police brutality. The brutal military crackdown at Lekki Toll Gate sent a chilling message: RESISTANCE comes with DEADLY CONSEQUENCES. Since then, citizen participation has weakened and many Nigerians now suffer in silence.

Political theorist Edmund Burke’s timeless warning comes alive: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Silence is Complicity and in Nigeria, it emboldens corrupt leaders.

6. POOR LEADERSHIP VISION.

Great nations are built on visionary leadership. Lee Kuan Yew transformed Singapore from a swamp into a global hub. Rwanda, under Paul Kagame, rose from genocide to become Africa’s model of governance. Nigeria’s leaders lack such foresight.

Nigerian politics is not driven by ideology or policy but by SURVIVAL, PATRONAGE and SHORT-TERM GAINS. Most leaders think only of the next election, not the next generation. Long-term planning is abandoned for QUICK-FIX POPULISM.

The late Nelson Mandela once said: “Visionary leadership means setting out a future that may not be popular but is necessary for progress.” Unfortunately, Nigerian leaders prefer POPULARITY over PROGRESS.

7. POVERTY and IGNORANCE.

Perhaps the most dangerous weapon sustaining bad governance is poverty. With over 133 million Nigerians living in multidimensional poverty (NBS 2022), politicians easily exploit the masses with food, cash or hollow promises during elections.

Hungry citizens rarely vote based on policy; they vote based on survival. A bag of rice, a few thousand naira or a temporary job is enough to buy loyalty. Poverty erodes critical thinking and weakens resistance against corrupt leaders.

Ignorance compounds the problem. Many citizens are unaware of their constitutional rights or the true responsibilities of government. Instead of demanding accountability, they worship politicians as benefactors. This ignorance is what keeps bad governance alive.

The Way Forward: CAN NIGERIA BREAK THE CYCLE?

Nigeria’s story need not remain a tragedy. Change is possible, but it requires COURAGE, VISION and SACRIFICE. First, institutions must be strengthened to checkmate leaders’ excesses. Second, MERIT (not ethnicity or religion) must drive appointments. Third, civic education must awaken citizens to their power. Finally, poverty alleviation must become central to governance, because a hungry population cannot defend democracy.

As former U.S. President Barack Obama once declared during his visit to Ghana: “Africa doesn’t need strong men. It needs strong institutions.” Nigeria must heed this call if it is to escape its endless dance with bad governance.

Final Thoughts.

Bad governance in Nigeria is not accidental; it is SYSTEMIC, DELIBERATE and SUSTAINED by CORRUPTION, WEAK INSTITUTIONS, TRIBALISM, POVERTY and CITIZEN APATHY. Until these cancers are addressed, Nigeria will continue to bleed, despite its enormous potential.

The destiny of over 200 million people cannot be left in the hands of selfish leaders and corrupt institutions. Citizens must rise, demand accountability and reject mediocrity. Otherwise, as Achebe warned decades ago, the trouble with Nigeria will remain SIMPLY and SQUARELY a FAILURE of LEADERSHIP.

Nigeria’s Tragedy of Leadership: Why Bad Governance Refuses to Die. (NIGERIA BLEEDS NOT FROM POVERTY BUT FROM LEADERSHIP FAILURE)
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Sahara Weekly

society

A Renewed Momentum: How the Chief of Army Staff is Repositioning the Nigerian Army for Decisive Impact

Published

on

*A Renewed Momentum: How the Chief of Army Staff is Repositioning the Nigerian Army for Decisive Impact*

By Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi.

 

 

In times of prolonged security challenges, it is easy—almost convenient—for critics to amplify setbacks while ignoring measurable progress. Yet, across Nigeria’s diverse and complex theatres of operation, a different story is steadily unfolding: one of resilience, tactical evolution, and renewed operational effectiveness under the leadership of the Chief of Army Staff, (COAS, Nigerian Army), Lt General Waidi Shaibu.

 

What we are witnessing today is not a media hype or propaganda—it is the outcome of deliberate reforms, improved coordination, and a reinvigorated fighting spirit within the Nigerian Army.

 

*A Clear Shift in Operational Effectiveness*

 

Recent developments across, but not limited to Benue, Plateau, Borno, Yobe, Sokoto, Zamfara, Kogi, Kwara, Edo, and the South-East underscore a critical truth: the Nigerian Army under General Waidi Shaibu is not on the back foot. On the contrary, it is increasingly proactive, intelligence-driven, and responsive.

 

From the successful rescue of kidnapped civilians in Benue, to the interception of armed militias in Plateau, and the neutralisation of insurgents in Borno, the pattern is consistent—swift response, precision engagement, and tangible outcomes.

 

These are not isolated victories. They reflect:

 

– Improved intelligence gathering and utilisation.

 

– Faster troop deployment and mobility.

 

– Enhanced inter-agency collaboration.

 

– Better morale and combat readiness among personnel.

 

Such coordination, especially in asymmetric warfare, does not happen by chance. It is a direct reflection of leadership at the top.

 

*The Chief of Army Staff: Lt General Waidi Shaibu Driving Reform and Results*

 

Since assuming office, the Chief of Army Staff, Lt General Waidi Shaibu has brought a renewed sense of urgency and clarity of purpose to military operations. His leadership style appears anchored on three critical pillars:

 

*1. Operational Aggression with Discipline*

 

Troops are no longer merely reacting—they are taking the fight to criminal elements. Whether dismantling terrorist camps in the North Central states or repelling coordinated attacks in the North-East, or engaging the Unknown Gunmen in the SouthEast, the Nigerian Army is demonstrating initiative and dominance.

 

*2. Intelligence-Led Warfare*

 

Modern conflicts are won as much with information as with firepower. The increasing success in intercepting logistics suppliers, uncovering IEDs, and preempting attacks shows a system that is becoming smarter, not just stronger.

 

*3. Joint Force Synergy*

 

The collaboration between the Army, Air Force, Navy, Police, DSS, and local security groups has significantly improved. Operations in the South Eastern part of the Country and other regions highlight a unified national security architecture—something that has long been advocated but is now visibly taking shape.

 

*Addressing the Culture of Criticism*

 

It must be said plainly: criticism is not inherently wrong in a democracy. However, what is deeply problematic is the pattern of uninformed, selective outrage that ignores context, dismisses progress, and undermines morale.

 

Those who hastily label every security incident as evidence of failure often:

 

– Ignore the complexity of asymmetric warfare.

 

– Overlook the sacrifices of frontline personnel.

 

– Fail to acknowledge the vast geographical and logistical challenges involved.

 

Worse still, some narratives are built on speculation, ethnic bias, or incomplete information—such as prematurely attributing crimes to specific groups without verification.

 

This does not help the nation. It weakens it.

 

*The Reality of the Battlefield*

 

Nigeria is not facing a conventional war. The threats are:

 

– Decentralised.

 

– Embedded within local communities.

 

– Adaptive and unpredictable.

 

From insurgents and bandits to kidnappers and economic saboteurs, the battlefield is fluid. Success, therefore, must be measured not by the absence of incidents, but by the capacity to respond, contain, and degrade threats over time.

 

By this standard, the Nigerian Army is making undeniable progress.

 

*The Human Element: Courage and Sacrifice*

 

Behind every operation report is a human story—soldiers who leave their families behind, who endure harsh terrains, who confront danger daily so that millions of Nigerians can live in relative safety.

 

Some pay the ultimate price.

 

To reduce their efforts to mere statistics or dismiss them outright is not just unfair—it is unjust.

 

*A Call for National Support*

 

The progress being recorded today must be sustained, and that requires more than military effort. It demands:

 

– Public cooperation with security agencies.

 

– Responsible media reporting.

 

– Community vigilance against criminal infiltration

 

– Constructive, informed criticism where necessary.

 

Most importantly, it requires national unity in purpose.

 

*Conclusion: A Force Worthy of Confidence*

 

The Nigerian Army, under the leadership of the Chief of Army Staff, Lt General Waidi Shaibu is demonstrating that with the right direction, commitment, and strategy, meaningful progress is possible—even in the face of complex security challenges.

 

The gains may not always make screaming headlines, but they are real. They are measurable. And they are building momentum.

 

Rather than constant condemnation, what the Armed Forces deserve at this critical time is recognition, encouragement, and unwavering support.

 

Because beyond the noise of criticism lies a simple truth:

these men and women are standing between order and chaos—and they are holding the line.

 

This article was written by Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi, an entrepreneur and an opinion moulder from Ibadan, Oyo State.

Continue Reading

society

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY

Published

on

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY

By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)

 

LAGOS — A recent publication by Sahara Reporters alleging systemic corruption, the creation of “mushroom units,” inflated budgets, and operational sabotage within the Nigerian Army has sparked concern across security and public circles.

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY

By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)

But a retired senior officer, Brigadier General D.G. James, has pushed back strongly, describing the claims as unsubstantiated, misleading, and damaging to the integrity of an institution that has borne the brunt of Nigeria’s internal security battles for over a decade.

 

Having served for 30 years across the North-East, North-West, and Niger Delta, the retired general said his intervention is not in defence of any individual, but of the institution itself.

 

Questioning Anonymous Claims

At the heart of the controversial report is a single unnamed source described as a “top military strategist.” General James argues that such anonymity, without corroborating evidence, weakens the credibility of the allegations.

“Serious claims about budgets, personnel, and logistics must be backed by verifiable documents, not vague assertions,” he said, challenging the publication to provide concrete proof, including records or sworn statements.

“Mushroom Units” or Operational Necessity?

The report’s claim that under-strength units were created to inflate budgets was also dismissed as a misunderstanding of modern counter-insurgency operations.

 

According to the retired officer, Nigeria’s evolving security threats — from Boko Haram and ISWAP in the North-East to banditry in the North-West and separatist tensions in the South-East, have necessitated the creation of flexible task forces and new formations.

 

“Operating below full strength is not evidence of corruption,” he said. “It reflects battlefield realities , casualties, redeployments, and expansion under pressure.”

 

Payroll and Logistics Allegations

On claims of double-counting personnel for financial gain, General James described the scenario as “logistically implausible,” citing centralized payroll systems tied to biometric verification.

He further noted that accusations of fuel diversion ignore broader structural issues within Nigeria’s budgeting system.

“Funds approved on paper are often not fully released. By the time allocations reach operational units, commanders are forced to manage limited resources,” he explained.

Reaction to Benisheik Reference

General James also condemned the report’s reference to the death of Brigadier General Oseni Braimah during an ISWAP attack in Benisheik, calling it an inappropriate attempt to link battlefield losses to alleged corruption.

“Using the death of a fallen officer to support unverified claims is deeply disrespectful,” he said.

Broader Accountability

While not dismissing the possibility of corruption in defence spending, the retired general emphasized that responsibility cannot be placed solely on the military.
He pointed to the role of the National Assembly in budget approvals and civilian institutions in oversight and prosecution.

“If there are flaws in the system, they are systemic , not exclusive to the armed forces,” he noted.

 

Call for Transparent Investigation

General James called for a thorough and independent investigation into the allegations, urging authorities to rely on verifiable evidence rather than media narratives.

“Let every claim be examined , but fairly, transparently, and without prejudice,” he said.

 

Reaffirming his lifelong loyalty to the military, the retired officer urged Nigerians to approach such reports with caution.
“Our soldiers have made enormous sacrifices in defence of this country. Allegations alone should not overshadow those realities,” he stated.

Continue Reading

society

IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity

Published

on

IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity

 

The Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Rilwan Disu, on Wednesday closed a Squadron Commanders’ Training Programme at the Police Mobile Force (PMF) Training College in Ende-Hills, Nasarawa State, vowing to strengthen leadership and operational effectiveness across the force.

At the ceremony, the IGP inspected training facilities including the simulation ground and shooting range, where he personally took part in tactical exercises. He told cadets of the Nigeria Police Academy undergoing training at the college to remain disciplined and focused, stressing that their effectiveness on the field would depend on the quality of their training.

“Resilience, professionalism, and strict adherence to human rights principles must guide your conduct,” Disu said.

Addressing the graduating squadron commanders, he urged them to apply their newly acquired skills in leadership, operational discipline, and tactical efficiency. He described the PMF as a “highly disciplined, responsive, and reliable tactical arm” of the Nigeria Police Force.

The IGP further reaffirmed his commitment to improving officers’ welfare and boosting operational capacity, assuring that formations would be adequately equipped to tackle evolving security challenges nationwide.

 

IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending