Connect with us

society

Professor Fidelis Oditah is Wrong about the EFCC By Dele Oyewale

Published

on

Professor Fidelis Oditah is Wrong about the EFCC

By Dele Oyewale

Professor Fidelis Oditah’s recent interactive discussion on a wide range of issues on Arise News, are quite engaging. As a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN and an international legal mind, his views on national issues cannot be disregarded. Benjamin Disraeli, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom once said, “with words we govern men”. Thus, Oditah’ s words are important and cannot be dismissed as empty effusion lacking weight or impact.

However, the learned Professor’s submission on what he called the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC’s three fundamental problems are, to say the least, prejudicial, unfounded and misleading. First, Oditah stated that “The EFCC is often being used for settling many scores. Some are political scores, some are social scores. So, you could run away from your girlfriend and the girlfriend goes to the EFCC and the EFCC could ask you questions(sic). What has that got to do with economic crimes? That is blatant abuse of power”(sic).

How on earth will this kind of a scenario painted by the learned silk hold water? The simplest argument against this kind of effusion is to challenge Oditah to provide proofs of such banality. We all know that this just an idle talk because the EFCC is a serious- minded law enforcement agency. The only worrisome aspect of such a talk is that it betrays an embarrassing lack of grasp of what the EFCC’s focus is.

This issue of appropriate and proper focusing of the mandate of the EFCC has been a central pivot of the three- pronged agenda of the Executive Chairman of the EFCC, Mr. Ola Olukoyede. In the full glare of the entire world, while addressing members of the National Assembly in October 2023, Olukoyede stated that the focus of every fight against corruption was to stimulate growth in the economy. For more than a year now, the EFCC’s boss has been consistently following this route. The review of the arrest and bail procedures of the EFCC is in line with this. Professor Oditah is probably busy with his works as a King’s Counsel in the United Kingdom and have no time to be abreast of development in the EFCC. Olukoyede is a lawyer of high pedigree and would not allow what the learned counsel called “ blatant abuse of power”.

The second “ fundamental problem of the EFCC”, according to Oditah is that “The EFCC has abandoned its mandate and reduce itself to a debt- collection agency, notwithstanding the numerous court decisions saying the EFCC must stay within the narrow confines of financial and economic crimes. The EFCC has gone out for debt recovery”. This submission, again, is hollow and vacuous. The EFCC’s Establishment Act does not empower the Commission to collect debt on behalf of anyone. The recovery the EFCC does is taking back proceeds of crime from fraudsters. Asset recovery, all over the world, is a fundamental law enforcement and anti- corruption initiative. As a matter of fact, it is the ground norm of every anti- corruption fight. To this end, Olukoyede in just one year, recovered  N248,750,049,365.52 (Two Hundred and Forty-Eight Billion, Seven Hundred and Fifty Million, Forty-Nine Thousand, Three Hundred and Sixty-Five Naira, Fifty-Two Kobo).

In foreign currencies,  recoveries of the Commission in the one year of Olukoyede’s leadership are: $105,423,190.39 (One Hundred and Five Million, Four Hundred and Twenty-Three Thousand, One Hundred and Ninety Dollars, Thirty-Nine Cents); £ 53,133.64 (Fifty-Three Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty-Three Pounds, Sixty-Four Pence; €172,547.10 (One Hundred and Seventy-Two Thousand, Five Hundred and Forty-Seven Euros, Ten Cents) and many others.

Going by the quantum of these recoveries, not to talk of real estate recovered all over the country, including shares acquired with proceeds of crime in blue- chip companies, it is simply preposterous to reduce and ridicule asset recoveries to debt recovery. Professor Oditah owes the EFCC and the entire nation unconditional apology in this regard. Just two days ago, a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos granted final forfeitures of over $2million and seven princely properties in choice areas of Lagos to the Federal Government. The assets are proceeds of crime traced to a former governor of Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN. Do such recoveries fall into the category of debt recovery insinuation of Oditah? President Bola Ahmed Tinubu recently directed that N100billion be channeled to the funding of the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CreditCorp, respectively from the monetary recoveries of the EFCC. Is the Professor aware of all these? It is evident that bringing down the issue of asset recovery to the ridiculous corridor of debt recovery is deliberate caricature of an important anti- corruption framework of the government. This is an initiative which local, regional and international agencies are commending Olukoyede and the EFCC about. It is to be noted also that the Director of FBI and the DG of National Crime Agency in the UK where he resides have paid cortesty visits to Olukoyede commending him on the feat he has attained in the fight against corruption and financial crimes and to seek more collaboration with the agency in their shared mandate of fighting corruption and financial crimes

The third issue Odikah raised against the EFCC, like the earlier issues, again, lacks any firm ground of substance. Hear him:
“The EFCC itself, a number of officers are more corrupt than those they are chasing. So, you remember what happened to Mr Bawa, Mr Matawalle, when Mr Matawalle finished his tenure as governor of Zamfara state and he said he was invited by Mr Bawa to bring $2million so as not to be investigated. The EFCC itself has become a corrupt organisation which needs to be completely disbanded and a new body set up . The EFCC has the resources. It does not have the ethics. The EFCC majors on minor issues, catching students and showing them as cyber criminals and so it says, it procured 1000 convictions and when you look at them they are people who have defrauded people of 20 or 22 dollars. That’s not the mandate. That’s the periphery. The central mandate is to ensure that the resources which are put in the hands of states are used by the states and that’s where the EFCC”

Going through all these trumped- up claims, it is obvious that Oditah has elected to totally launch unwarranted verbal war against the Commission and its officers. How many officers of the EFCC have been tainted with corruption allegations? Is it acceptable to use the “ sins” of very few elements in a community to paint and taint it as a community of sinners? It should be noted that there is no law enforcement agency in the world that is not vulnerable to corrupt officers. What is important is what the agency is doing to such elements. Olukoyede is known for his no- nonsense approach to ethical issues in the Commission. As a matter of fact, upon assumption of duties, he directed every officer of the Commission to declare their assets and ensure that verification of assets so declared is established. He went ahead to name the Department of Internal Affairs as Department of Ethics and Integrity. Beyond all these, some erring officers of the Commission have either been shown the way out or facing trial. In recent times, the Commission has had cause to dismiss some officers on allegations of corruption and gross misconduct. The EFCC is self- cleansing and the Commission deserves commendation for this.

It is worrisome that a Professor of the reputation and exposure of Oditah could dismiss the Commission’s onslaught against internet fraudsters as an unserious engagement. The damages this genre of fraudsters are causing the nation is untold. A crime that has a projection of $10.6trillion loss to the whole world in 2025 and Nigeria lost more than $500million in 2022 alone, is what Oditah derisively lampooned the EFCC about. We have cause to be worried that those who ought to know better are either playing the Ostrich or advertising their ignorance of a major malaise confronting the nation. Owing to the threat of cybercrimes to the development of our country, the EFCC has held two national dialogues on it. The recent one held few days ago at the Presidential Villa. The Professor should know that the EFCC mandate is to investigate all financial and economic crimes and no financial crime is small or big to be investigated in order to save the soul of the nation. It should be recalled that in recent times, the EFCC had had cause to prosecute and file charges against four ex- governors and some former ministers who were found culpable by EFCC’s investigation for looting state treasuries. This is just to confirm that the Commission is not scared of taking up large- scale fraud’s investigations and prosecution which we shall continue to do

There is no denying the fact that the respected professor goofed in all his comments about the EFCC and his views are not reflective of the realities on ground concerning the anti- corruption fight of the government.

On a final note, we enjoin professor Oditah to get himself familiar with the works of the Commission and lend his expertise and rich experience to the nation for a more robust and fully- integrated war against corruption. We also want to advise the fourth estate of the realm not to allow their platforms to be used to cast unfounded aspersions on the good works of the EFCC. The Commission is not averse to meaningful contributions and advise from well- meaning and reform- minded Nigerians to strengthen our processes and procedures as we continue this crusade,

*** Dele Oyewale is Head, Media & Publicity of the EFCC.

society

Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso, Makinde, Ajadi, Others Converge in Ibadan for Historic Opposition Summit Ahead of 2027

Published

on

Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso, Makinde, Ajadi, Others Converge in Ibadan for Historic Opposition Summit Ahead of 2027

 

 

In a significant political convergence that could reshape Nigeria’s democratic landscape ahead of the 2027 general elections, prominent opposition leaders, including Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, and Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, gathered in Ibadan on Saturday for the National Summit of Opposition Political Parties Leaders.

 

The high-level summit, held at the Banquet Hall of the Government House Ibadan, also drew the participation of leading gubernatorial aspirant in Oyo State under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Ambassador Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo, alongside several political heavyweights and stakeholders across party lines.

 

Convened under the theme, “That We May Work Together for a United Opposition to Sustain Our Democracy,” the summit brought together representatives from major opposition platforms including the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Labour Party, New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), African Democratic Congress (ADC), and the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP).

 

Other notable figures at the summit included former Senate President David Mark, former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, and former Sokoto State Governor Aminu Tambuwal.

 

Also in attendance were elder statesman Olagunsoye Oyinlola, former Niger State Governor Babangida Aliyu, political economist Pat Utomi, social activist Aisha Yesufu, and former APC National Secretary John Akpanudoedehe, among others.

 

Speakers and stakeholders at the summit examined critical national issues, including electoral reforms, national security, economic recovery, and the need for stronger democratic institutions, as part of efforts to forge a united opposition front ahead of 2027.

 

Ambassador Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo, who actively participated in the summit, spoke with journalists shortly after stepping out of the Banquet Hall. Addressing newsmen, Ajadi described the gathering as a turning point for opposition politics in Nigeria.

 

“This summit represents a new beginning for the opposition in Nigeria. What we are seeing is a deliberate effort to put aside differences and work towards a common goal,” Ajadi said.

 

He noted that the collaboration among diverse political actors signals a renewed commitment to national development and democratic consolidation.

 

Nigerians are looking for direction and credible leadership. The responsibility is on us as opposition leaders to provide that alternative and restore confidence in governance,” he added.

 

Analysts say the Ibadan summit marks one of the most coordinated efforts by opposition forces in recent years, signaling early realignments and possible coalition-building ahead of the next general elections.

 

As deliberations continue, political observers believe the outcomes of the summit could significantly influence Nigeria’s political direction, particularly if the unity advocated by participants translates into concrete alliances.

Continue Reading

society

Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026: Abuja and Lagos Set the Stage for a New Era of Local Innovation and Enterprise

Published

on

Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026: Abuja and Lagos Set the Stage for a New Era of Local Innovation and Enterprise

 

 

Abuja and Lagos are poised to surge with energy, enterprise, and cultural expression as the Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026 takes centre stage—an event designed not merely to display products, but to redefine perception.

 

More than a conventional exhibition, this gathering signals a confident assertion of Nigeria’s productive strength. Entrepreneurs, manufacturers, creatives, and industry leaders from across the nation will assemble to present a compelling spectrum of locally made goods. From premium leather craftsmanship and cutting-edge fashion to beauty innovations, agro-based solutions, and artisanal creations, each showcase reflects ingenuity shaped by resilience and ambition.

 

 

At the heart of the exhibition lies a deliberate push to elevate emerging brands. Many small businesses operate with limited visibility, often constrained by access and exposure. This platform disrupts that pattern. By offering opportunities such as complimentary booth spaces for selected participants, it opens the door for underrepresented talents to step into the spotlight—not just to sell, but to be seen, evaluated, and remembered.

 

According to Bola Awosika, the driving force behind the initiative, “This exhibition is about shifting mindsets. Nigerian products are not just alternatives—they are competitive, innovative, and globally relevant. We are creating a space where local brands can be experienced, trusted, and elevated.”

The exhibition will hold biannually in both Abuja and Lagos:

 

Abuja Edition

• First Edition: 27th–28th June 2026

• Second Edition: 12th–13th December 2026

Lagos Edition

• First Edition: 25th–26th July 2026

• Second Edition: 19th–20th December 2026

 

Each edition will draw a dynamic mix of participants—buyers scouting quality, investors searching for scalable ideas, media documenting emerging trends, and everyday Nigerians engaging with products that reflect their identity. Conversations sparked within the exhibition halls are expected to extend beyond introductions, evolving into partnerships and long-term collaborations.

The experience itself goes beyond static displays.

 

Attendees will encounter live demonstrations, immersive product storytelling, interactive sessions, and curated networking opportunities. It becomes less about walking through aisles and more about engaging directly with the pulse of Nigerian creativity and enterprise.

 

Yet, the exhibition carries a broader economic and cultural message. It challenges consumer habits, urging Nigerians to support domestic production while reinforcing confidence in local capabilities. Every transaction becomes a statement—one that contributes to national growth and industrial sustainability.

 

For many participants, this platform could mark a pivotal shift. A relatively unknown brand may secure national recognition. A hidden talent could attract strategic investment. An early-stage idea might evolve into a scalable enterprise. The ripple effects are designed to outlast the exhibition itself.

 

 

As the momentum builds business owners have started making enquiries and booking stands for each edition, what remains is not just a successful event, but a strengthened narrative—one that positions Nigerian products as credible, competitive, and ready for global markets.

 

 

Call to Participate: Affordable Access, Strategic Opportunity

 

As preparations intensify, the Convener, Bola Awosika, has extended a direct invitation to entrepreneurs, brands, and industry players to seize the opportunity presented by the exhibition.

 

“We have deliberately structured this exhibition to be inclusive and accessible. With pocket-friendly stand rates, we are removing the usual barriers that prevent many businesses from participating. Vendors can secure their booths at ₦150,000 and ₦200,000 respectively. This is not just a cost—it is an investment in visibility, credibility, and growth. We encourage businesses across Nigeria to take advantage of this platform to position their brands for new markets and opportunities,” she stated.

 

Beyond vendor participation, she emphasized the importance of collaboration in delivering a world-class event.

 

“it will be an annual event. We are also calling on corporate organisations, development institutions, and forward-thinking brands to come on board as sponsors and partners. This exhibition is a national platform with significant economic impact, and there is immense value for organisations looking to align with innovation, enterprise, and local content development.”

Interested exhibitors, sponsors, and partners can access more information and secure participation via the official website: www.nigeriaexportsexhibition.com.ng

 

The exhibition is currently supported by notable institutions including Bank of Industry, Lagos State Internal Revenue Service, and Sahcol, with additional sponsors and partners expected to join as momentum builds.

 

 

Powered by Bevents Logistics Synergy, the Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026 stands not as a fleeting showcase, but as a sustained movement—one that redefines how Nigeria sees its own potential and how the world engages with it.

 

Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026: Abuja and Lagos Set the Stage for a New Era of Local Innovation and Enterprise

Continue Reading

society

Rebalancing The Force: Why Police Visibility Must Reach The Ordinary Citizen

Published

on

Rebalancing The Force: Why Police Visibility Must Reach The Ordinary Citizen

 

In every functioning society, the true test of policing is not what happens in elite corridors of influence, but what the ordinary citizen experiences on the street.

For too long, that balance has been distorted.

Recent criticism surrounding the redeployment of officers from Zone 2 Command in Lagos has been framed in sensational terms: mass transfers, alleged illegality, internal discontent. But beneath the noise lies a far more important and uncomfortable truth: Nigeria’s policing structure, particularly in high-interest zones, has been uneven, inefficient, and in urgent need of correction.

This is the context within which the actions of the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, must be understood.

The ongoing exercise is not incidental. It is the direct outcome of a clearly defined restructuring objective under the leadership of the Inspector-General: one that prioritises the even and adequate distribution of personnel for effective policing across the country.

Zone 2 Command, which oversees Lagos and Ogun States, has evolved over time into something beyond its administrative mandate. Rather than functioning strictly as a supervisory and coordination hub, it has become heavily populated, far beyond operational necessity.

In practical terms, this has meant one thing: a concentration of personnel where they are least needed, and a shortage where they are most needed.

While Zone 2 swelled with officers, reportedly far exceeding standard staffing expectations, divisional police stations, community posts, and rural commands have continued to operate below capacity.

The result?

* Slower response times
* Reduced police visibility in neighborhoods
* Overworked officers in understaffed stations
* Communities left feeling exposed

No serious policing system can justify that imbalance.

Security is not theoretical. It is not a concept measured in internal postings or administrative convenience. It is measured in presence: visible, responsive, and accessible.

When citizens say they do not “feel” the police, what they are really saying is simple: the system is not reaching them.

Redistributing personnel is not punishment. It is not arbitrary. It is the essence of operational policing.

This is precisely the thinking driving the current reforms under IGP Olatunji Disu—the deliberate repositioning of the Force to ensure that policing is not concentrated in a few administrative centres, but extended meaningfully to the communities that need it most.

The Inspector-General’s position is therefore not only defensible, it is necessary:
policing must be felt everywhere.

There is also an open secret that cannot be ignored.

Assignments to certain commands, particularly those linked to high-value civil disputes such as land matters, have historically attracted disproportionate interest. The concentration of officers in such zones is not always driven by operational need, but by perceived opportunity.

This distortion has long undermined equitable deployment.

Correcting it requires more than caution; it requires leadership and resolve, both of which are reflected in the current restructuring agenda of the Inspector-General.

Under the Nigeria Police Act, the Inspector-General of Police retains administrative authority over postings and redeployments within the Force.

Transfers are not extraordinary measures. They are routine instruments of:

* Discipline
* Efficiency
* Institutional balance

To label such actions as “illegal” without reference to any breached statute is to substitute sentiment for law.

More importantly, it distracts from the real issue:
Are officers deployed where Nigerians actually need them?

Nigeria is approaching a critical period.

With elections on the horizon, the demand for:

* Crowd control
* Community intelligence
* Rapid response capability

will increase significantly.

A police force clustered in administrative zones cannot meet that demand.

Lagos needs officers.
Ogun needs officers.
Communities need presence, not paperwork.

There is also a deeper dimension often ignored in public discourse; the welfare of officers themselves.

Overconcentration in some commands and understaffing in others creates:

* Burnout in frontline stations
* Irregular shifts
* Mental fatigue
* Reduced effectiveness

A properly distributed force, one of the core objectives of the current restructuring led by IGP Olatunji Disu allows for:

* Structured shifts
* Better rest cycles
* Improved mental health
* Higher operational efficiency

This is not just about deployment. It is about sustainability.

It is worth noting that previous leaderships have attempted to decongest Zone 2. Those efforts faltered, not because they were wrong, but because they lacked the consistency and institutional backing required to see them through.

Reform, by its nature, is disruptive.

But disruption is not dysfunction.
It is often the first step toward order.

The debate, therefore, should not be:

“Why are officers being transferred?”

The real question is:

Why were so many officers concentrated in one administrative zone while communities remained under-policed?

Until that question is answered honestly, resistance to reform will continue to masquerade as concern.

At its core, policing exists for one purpose: to protect the public.

Not selectively.
Not strategically for advantage.
But universally.

If restructuring ensures that:

* more officers are on the streets,
* more communities are covered, and
* more citizens feel safe,

then it is not just justified, it is imperative.

The common man does not measure policing by internal postings.
He measures it by presence.

And under the current reform-driven leadership, that presence is being deliberately, and necessarily, restored.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending