Connect with us

celebrity radar - gossips

Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy

Published

3 years ago

on

Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy

Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy

Deborah Seyram Adablah, a resident of Accra, has filed a lawsuit against the man she claims to be her “sugar daddy,” Ernest Kwasi Nimako, for allegedly breaching an agreement to care for her.
She has also accused the “sugar daddy” of abuse, sexual harassment, maltreatment, exploitation, and degrading her reputation, as well as claiming that she was forced into the relationship during her national service. Deborah Seyram Adablah, in a suit filed on January 23, 2023, at the Accra High Court, claims that her “sugar daddy” [name withheld] agreed to buy her a car, pay for her housing for three years, give her a monthly stipend of GH3,000, marry her after divorcing his wife, and give her a lump sum to start a business.
Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy
Her claim is that although the “sugar daddy” purchased the car and registered it in his name, he has taken the car back, denying her access to use it after about a year of using the Honda Civic worth GH120,000 while he also paid for only one year’s worth of housing.
Reliefs
the plaintiff seeks a court order directing the “sugar daddy” to transfer the title of the vehicle into her name and return the vehicle.
She also asks the court to order the defendant to pay her the fixed sum so she can “start a business to support herself, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the defendant.”
The court should also order the “sugar daddy” to pay the two years of unpaid rent, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the defendant.
Again, she requests that the court order the defendant to pay her medical bills as a result of a “side effect of a family planning treatment” that the defendant advised her to undergo in order to prevent pregnancy.
a) An order requiring the first defendant to transfer title to vehicle No. GC-7899-21 in the name of the plaintiff and/or an order directing the DVLA to register the vehicle in the plaintiff’s name.
b) A GH10,000.00 refund of the cost of repairs that the first Defendant promised to refund to the plaintiff but neglected to do so.
c) An order requiring the defendants to pay the following to the plaintiff:
(i) The 1st Defendant pays a lump sum to the plaintiff, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the 1st Defendant, so that the plaintiff can establish a business to support herself.
ii) The 1st Defendant pays the remaining two (2) years of rent for the Plaintiff’s housing or pays the same amount for the remaining two (2) years at the same rate for alternative housing.
(iii) The first Defendant shall pay the outstanding arrears of the Plaintiff’s monthly allowance from July 2022 to the date of judgement, as well as all medical expenses incurred as a consequence of the Family Planning treatment’s side effects.
General damages were awarded against the defendants.
(d) Any additional relief the court deems appropriate, including legal fees
The plaintiff contends that in exchange for the first defendant’s assurances that he would leave the bank and not enter into a contract, the first defendant made the following representations and promises to the plaintiff:
• Lump-sum working capital for business startup
• Pay her housing or rent for three years.
• Acquire her a car.
• Provide GH3,000.00 per month.
• Give the plaintiff a ring.
• Pay her medical and other bills, including the cost of a family planning treatment to prevent her from becoming pregnant in the near future.
• To marry Plaintiff after divorcing his wife during their parlour relationship because the first defendant’s relationship with his wife was challenged with irreconcilable differences and the marriage had broken down beyond repair or reconciliation.
Affirmation of Claim
1. The plaintiff is a jobless woman living in Labadi, Accra.
2. The first Defendant is a director of finance at the Accra headquarters of the second Defendant bank.
3. The second Defendant is a bank or financial institution registered under the laws of the Republic of Ghana with its registered office in Accra, which employs the first Defendant and where the plaintiff worked as a National Service employee until she left the bank.
4. Plaintiff asserts that she worked for the 2nd Defendant bank as National Service personnel and that the 1st Defendant was her supervisor as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at the 2nd Defendant bank.
5. Plaintiff asserts that on or around 10/10/2020, she was assigned to the 2nd Defendant bank’s Head Office to perform her National Service, where the 1st Defendant worked as the Head of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
6. The plaintiff asserts that she and the first Defendant engaged in a parlour relationship during her national service. Plaintiff asserts that the relationship began as a result of persistent sexual harassment and abuse by the 1st Defendant, a superior officer who exerted a great deal of power, to which the plaintiff eventually gave in, without which she would have found working in the office of the 2nd Defendant to be a living hell.
7. Plaintiff asserts that when she began working for the second Defendant bank, she witnessed persistent sexual harassment by senior male officers against female bank employees and that if you refused to comply with their demands, your life in the bank became unhappy, uncomfortable, and hostile. Plaintiff asserts that virtually every senior manager has a fiancée at the bank and that they are free to switch partners with the knowledge of the managers of the second defendant bank. They also use us, the female staff, to make sexual advances on extremely wealthy customers with the intention of seducing them into opening bank accounts to our detriment.
8. Plaintiff asserts that she had no choice but to fall victim to the 1st Defendant and consent to a parlour relationship with the 1st Defendant in light of the persistent sexual harassment and abuse perpetrated by the 15th Defendant against her. The second Defendant allegedly did nothing to stop the harassment and abuse but instead encouraged it through her inaction. Plaintiff asserts that, as her employer, 2nd Defendant owed her a duty of care, which 2nd Defendant breached, and, to make matters worse, 2nd Defendant also pressured her to reach out to male customers in exchange for opening bank accounts with intercourse.
9. Plaintiff asserts that her relationship with the Parlour was open and known to nearly all employees of the 2nd Defendant bank and the 2nd Defendant. Not only was the 2nd Defendant aware of the plaintiff’s unholy and problematic work relationship, but it was the norm in the 2nd Defendant’s bank, and the 2nd Defendant did nothing to protect his or her female employees, including the Plaintiff.
10. Plaintiff asserts that, at the time she joined as National Service personnel, there was a married woman employee who was also harassed and gave in, and that this was an open secret in the bank, known by all the employees, and that no one can question this because you risk losing your job with the second defendant bank.
11. Plaintiff asserts that no employee is willing to testify to this effect because they all fear losing their employment. This is a single battle that the plaintiff fights in the hope that many female workers will be liberated from their servitude.
Plaintiff asserts that, at all relevant times, the 2nd Defendant owed a duty of care to its employees, particularly female employees who were perpetually sexually harassed and abused in the workplace with the knowledge of the 2nd Defendant, who watched and encouraged the same since all the top executives were involved in these sex matches, including the Plaintiff’s own with the 1st defendant.
According to the Labour Act of Ghana, the second defendant owed certain duties to her employees, and the employees’ rights were violated by the second defendant.
12. The plaintiff asserts that she was not the only person performing National Service during the period in question. She had other coworkers performing National Service at roughly the same time. Plaintiff asserts that when National Service was about to conclude, National Service personnel, including herself and her colleagues, were about to be hired by the bank as Contract Employees.
13. Plaintiff asserts that the 1st defendant, having abused his position as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), harassed her into accepting a parlour relationship and persuaded her to leave the bank despite the fact that she and her coworkers had the opportunity to continue as Contract Staff so that they could continue the parlour relationship at an enticing compensation.
14. Plaintiff received all assurances from the first defendant to leave the bank and not sign a contract, and in exchange, the first defendant made representations and assurances to the plaintiff that he would provide the following:
• Lump-sum working capital for business startup
• Pay her housing or rent for three years.
• Acquire her a car.
• Provide GH3,000.00 per month.
• Give the plaintiff a ring.
• Pay her medical and other bills, including the cost of a family planning treatment to prevent her from becoming pregnant in the near future.
• To marry Plaintiff after divorcing his wife during their parlour relationship because the first defendant’s relationship with his wife was challenged with irreconcilable differences and the marriage had broken down beyond repair or reconciliation.
Typically, to care for the plaintiff
15. Plaintiff asserts that based on these representations, when her colleagues were hired on Contract, she did not even apply for the position and left upon completion of her National Service in July 2021. The plaintiff also consented to a parlour relationship with the first defendant prior to their marriage.
16. Plaintiff asserts that, having undertaken and agreed to carry out her portion of the agreement as stated in paragraphs 14 and 15 of this complaint, the 15th defendant also agreed to carry out his portion of the agreement.
17. Plaintiff asserts that, in accordance with the 15th defendant’s representations and assurances, he provided the plaintiff with a two-bedroom flat at a monthly rental rate of GH1,500 and paid the first year’s rent, leaving an outstanding two years’ rent of H/No.GL-010-0745 Labadi, Accra, which the plaintiff is still occupying at the time of the issuance of this Writ and which is due to be renewed. The plaintiff has been taken to the rent control office for eviction.
18. Plaintiff asserts that the 1st Defendant also began paying the Plaintiff a monthly stipend, allowance, or salary of GH3,000 per month and continued to do so until July 2022, when the parties began having differences and the 1st Defendant is now in arrears of payment at the time of issuing this Writ.
19. Additionally, the first Defendant asked the Plaintiff to search for a vehicle so that he could pay for it. Plaintiff contacted a car dealer and purchased a vehicle, i.e., A home-used and unregistered Honda Civic. Plaintiff negotiated a price of GH120,000, after which she referred the car dealer to the 1st defendant, who paid for the vehicle, registered it, and gave the keys to the Plaintiff, who has been driving it for about a year.
20. Plaintiff further alleges that the 1st Defendant, in order to ensure that he monitored Plaintiff’s movement and to have a monopoly over her, installed a monitoring device, i.e., a tracking device, in Plaintiff’s car and monitored Plaintiff everywhere she went, even when he was out of the country. He can stop the car at his whim.
21. Plaintiff asserts that, in furtherance of the First Defendant’s desire to engage in carnal activity, the Second Defendant had intercourse with her without protection from the 1st defendant and subjected the plaintiff to a hazardous medical family planning treatment, despite the parties’ knowledge of the risk, which she brought to the 1st defendant’s attention. Therefore, the first Defendant paid for the plaintiff’s family planning treatment at Marie Stopes Clinic Kokomlemle, Accra, as well as her medical expenses each time she experienced excessive bleeding as a result of the Family Planning injection.
Recently, the plaintiff experienced similar excessive haemorrhaging and contacted the first Defendant, who refused to pay for treatment. The plaintiff has been experiencing complications and has sought treatment at both Trust Hospital and 37 Military Hospital.
22. Plaintiff had to appear to be a secretary in the office called Emefa whenever the 1st Defendant’s wife called, per the instructions of the 1st Defendant, to confirm to the plaintiff that his marriage had indeed been challenged.
Insofar as the wife contacted the plaintiff to verify the story.
23. The plaintiff alleges that she and the first defendant have been having relationship-related disagreements as of late. 15 The defendant desired abnormal carnal knowledge of the plaintiff, but the plaintiff refused.
This continued recurrently, and the parties’ differences widened.
24. Plaintiff asserts that the first defendant made requests of a similar nature that were not in accordance with societal norms. The plaintiff and the first defendant subsequently met and decided to terminate their relationship.
25. The parties reached an agreement for the first Defendant to compensate the Plaintiff at one of these meetings held at Brasa Restaurant. Fearing that this may be denied in the future by either party, the plaintiff requested that an audio or video recording be made of the understanding or agreements reached at the meeting. Plaintiff and the first defendant sent Plaintiff text messages indicating that their agreement is available and will be presented at trial.
26. Plaintiff asserts that on one occasion, while the first defendant was out of the country in Dubai, the first defendant used the tracking device to forcibly stop his vehicle while he was driving on the road, posing a life-threatening situation. Plaintiff agreed to repair the car or be reimbursed by the first Defendant. However, when the plaintiff repaired the car and informed the first Defendant, he instead went to the Mechanic and sprayers and showed them the documents of the car, indicating his name as the owner of the car. The first Defendant insisted on retrieving the vehicle, but the mechanic, welder, and sprayer denied him access. The plaintiff asserts that the Welder was paid GH10, 000.00 in total. The plaintiff paid GH500.00 for the mechanic’s parts and labour, GH6500, and GH3, 000.00 for the sprayer, but they have not issued a receipt despite repeated requests.
27. Plaintiff asserts that it wasn’t until this time that she realised the vehicle was not registered in her name. The plaintiff asserts that this was unexpected. The plaintiff also instructed the mechanics and sprayers to file a police report, which they did. However, the first Defendant has threatened them, so they will not want to be involved in this case.
28. Plaintiff asserts that she instructed her attorneys to discuss this with the 1st defendant’s attorneys, but that the 1st defendant was willing to change the title of the car he purchased for the Plaintiff into the Plaintiff’s name and pay a portion of the medical expenses, but not all of them, resulting in this lawsuit.
29. The plaintiff also went to the DOVVSU at the police headquarters, but the police did not provide her with the necessary assistance.
30. The plaintiff then instructed her attorney to assume the case, and her attorney wrote to the first Defendant in an attempt to reach a settlement, but the first Defendant failed, refused, or failed to settle.
31. Plaintiff asserts that after 1st Defendant received the notice from her Lawyer, 1st Defendant filed a theft complaint at a police station and was accompanied by the head of 2nd defendant’s security, […], who led the police team to besiege her house, forcibly take the vehicle, and tow it to the Greater Accra Regional Police Station on a working day. Plaintiff possesses photographs and videos of the 1st Defendant and the 2nd Defendant’s representative (Daniel Afrifa), who led the police to invade Plaintiff’s residence, humiliated her, and left her in a constant state of shock, tarnishing her reputation in the eyes of the law-abiding members of her community, Labadi-Lamptey George.
32. The plaintiff was shocked to learn that she was being accused of stealing the automobile that the first defendant purchased for her during their relationship. Police met both parties, including the director of the second Defendant’s security, who participated actively and at one point challenged the crime officer, who condemned the arrest of his officers and the defendants. After listening to the parties, the police determined that the defendants misled them into acting since they believed that was not theft, and they returned the vehicle to the plaintiff.
33. Plaintiff asserts that the police and the defendants humiliated her at her residence, causing her acquaintances to stare at her, the police to assault her, and the incident to be reported to the Labadi Police Station. All of this was done in bad faith, and the defendants led the police to maliciously arrest and prosecute her for a crime they knew she did not commit.
34. As a result of the malicious behaviour demonstrated by the defendants, the plaintiff has experienced a shock, and this treatment has affected her for some time and continues to haunt her. Fingers continue to be pointed at her.
35. Plaintiff asserts that the police released her vehicle days later. The attorney for the first defendant then responded to the letter by denying the claims.
36. Plaintiff alleges that she has been used, abused, maltreated, exploited, deceived, disappointed, failed, and degraded as a result of defendants’ actions. Plaintiff was also repeatedly verbally threatened by the first Defendant, who also sent her threatening text messages that placed her life in danger, as evidenced by her Statement to the Police.
37. The conduct of the Defendants has harmed the Plaintiff and diminished her reputation and standing in her community. Furthermore, the first Defendant has failed to carry out their understandings, arrangements, promises, and/or agreements, and he will continue his permanent refusal unless compelled by this honourable court.
38. Therefore, the Plaintiff asserts the following claims against the defendants:
39. a) An order requiring the first defendant to transfer title to vehicle No. GC-7899-21 in the name of the plaintiff and/or an order directing the DVLA to register the vehicle in the plaintiff’s name.
40. b) A GH10,000.00 refund of the cost of repairs that the first Defendant promised to refund to the plaintiff but neglected to do so.
41. c) An order requiring the defendants to pay the following to the plaintiff:
(i) The 1st Defendant pays a lump sum to the plaintiff, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the 1st Defendant, so that the plaintiff can establish a business to support herself.
(ii) The 1st Defendant pays the remaining two years of rent for the Plaintiff’s housing or pays the same amount for the remaining two years at the same rate for alternative housing.
(iii) The first Defendant shall pay the outstanding arrears of the Plaintiff’s monthly allowance from July 2022 to the date of judgement, as well as all medical expenses incurred as a consequence of the Family Planning treatment’s side effects.
General damages were awarded against the defendants.
(d) Any additional relief the court deems appropriate, including legal fees
conclusion, If you or someone you know has experienced sexual harassment, it’s important to take it seriously and seek help if needed. Sexual harassment is unacceptable behaviour, and it can have serious consequences for the victim’s physical and emotional well-being. It’s important to remember that sexual harassment can happen to anyone, regardless of gender, age, or occupation. It can take many different forms, from unwanted touching to inappropriate comments or gestures. If you or someone you know has been sexually harassed, it’s important to speak up and report the behaviour to the appropriate authorities. You may also want to seek counselling or support from a trusted friend or family member.
It’s also important to remember that sexual harassment is a form of discrimination and is illegal in many countries. Victims of sexual harassment have legal rights and protections, and they may be entitled to compensation for any harm they have suffered as a result of the harassment. Sexual harassment is a serious issue that should not be ignored. If you or someone you know has experienced sexual harassment, it’s important to take steps to address the behaviour and seek help if necessary because the case stated above is a clear example of what ladies or young ladies go through in Ghana.
Related Topics:

Sahara weekly online is published by First Sahara weekly international. contact [email protected]

Continue Reading
Advertisement

celebrity radar - gossips

DETERRENCE OR CATASTROPHE? ON THE BRINK OF A REDEFINING MIDDLE EAST WAR: A CALL FOR THE DIPLOMATIC PATH FORWARD

Published

16 hours ago

on

January 31, 2026

By

THE BURATAI CONUNDRUM: A STRATEGIC DISSERVICE TO NATIONAL INTEREST By Femi Oyewale

DETERRENCE OR CATASTROPHE? ON THE BRINK OF A REDEFINING MIDDLE EAST WAR: A CALL FOR THE DIPLOMATIC PATH FORWARD

By Lt Gen Tukur Yusufu Buratai Rtd CFR

We stand at a precipice where a single decision could redefine the future of the Middle East and send shockwaves through a fragile global order. The choice appears deceptively simple: to strike militarily in pursuit of deterrence or to withstand perceived aggression. Yet, this framing is a dangerous illusion. A direct, full-scale conflict between the United States, its allies, and Iran would not be a controlled exercise in power projection. It would be the ignition of a regional inferno with no clear exit, where the initial objective of “deterrence” would be consumed within hours by the unforgiving law of unintended consequences. The path of war promises not a decisive victory, but a cascade of devastation—human, economic, and strategic—that would leave all parties and the world profoundly poorer and more unstable. In this stark reality, diplomacy is not a sign of weakness; it is the singular, rational imperative for survival.

The Illusion of a Clear Victory

The allure of a military solution rests on a straightforward calculus: degrade critical nuclear and military infrastructure, cripple the command structures of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and deliver a blow so decisive that Iran’s regional influence collapses. Proponents envision a rapid, surgical campaign that reestablishes undisputed deterrence. However, this vision fundamentally misjudges the nature of the adversary and the dynamics of the region. As former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Andrew P. Miller cautions, even a successful strike “would likely prove a Pyrrhic victory” for broader strategic goals, failing to achieve durable political outcomes. Iran would not absorb a strike passively and capitulate. Retaliation would be swift, multidimensional, and devastating.

Indeed, as noted by Seyed Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian nuclear negotiator and scholar at Princeton University, Tehran perceives such a confrontation as an “existential war,” a stance that would “eliminate any incentive for restraint, unleashing a conflict that would be impossible to control.” We would witness not a single battle but the violent opening of multiple, simultaneous fronts. Hezbollah’s vast arsenal of precision-guided rockets would rain down on Israeli cities. Iranian proxies in Iraq and Syria would target the U.S. personnel and bases with relentless aggression. The Houthis could unleash further chaos on global shipping. Most critically, Iran itself would likely launch direct missile and drone attacks against Gulf state oil infrastructure and, potentially, attempt to blockade the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint for nearly 25% of global seaborne oil trade. The initial “surgical strike” would, within days, metastasize into a sprawling regional war with no defined battlefield and no clear rules of engagement.

The Unbearable Costs: A World Remade by War

The consequences would swiftly spiral beyond the military domain, etching a deep scar across global stability. The human cost would be immediate and horrifying, with casualties mounting not just among combatants but in urban centres targeted by long-range artillery and missiles. As analyzed by the BBC, a primary risk is the collapse of the Iranian regime into chaos or civil war,” which would spark “a severe humanitarian and refugee crisis” of immense proportions, a scenario where “nobody wants to see the largest Middle East nation by population… descend into chaos.”

The economic shock would be felt in every corner of the world. A successful disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, even temporarily, would trigger an instantaneous spike in oil prices, catapulting the global economy into a profound inflationary recession. Supply chains would seize, markets would panic, and the cost of basic necessities would skyrocket worldwide. This is not a speculative risk; it is a guaranteed outcome of Iran’s stated asymmetric doctrine.

Strategically, the war would unmoor the region for a generation. The delicate, if tense, balance among regional powers would shatter. Even if the Iranian regime were severely weakened, the result would not be a peaceful vacuum but a vortex of chaos. As Afshon Ostovar, an associate professor at the Naval Postgraduate School, warns of potential internal collapse, “the ruling apparatus, in other words, would collapse gradually, and then suddenly.” A fractured state could descend into civil conflict, its hardline elements unleashing terror networks, and rival powers scrambling to carve spheres of influence. The painstakingly built, if flawed, security architecture of the past half-century would lie in ruins. The ultimate outcomes of a strike are profoundly unpredictable, but none point toward a more stable or secure order for the United States, Israel, or their allies. Victory, in any meaningful sense, would be unrecognizable.

The Diplomatic Path: Not an Ideal, But a Necessity

Faced with this landscape of ruin, the diplomatic path emerges not as a naive ideal but as the only pragmatic tool for managing an existential threat. It is the circuit breaker for the escalatory spiral that guarantees mutual destruction. This is not an argument for appeasement or for trusting the untrustworthy. It is a cold-eyed recognition that only through calibrated statecraft can we navigate away from the brink. This view is echoed by regional voices, such as an editorial in The National, which asserts that “various regional actors are urging non-military ways to change relationships with Tehran” and that “now is a time for focused and determined diplomacy to chart a path away from war.”

The goal of diplomacy in this context is not to achieve a grand reconciliation overnight but to relentlessly pursue de-escalation and create mechanisms for crisis management. It involves empowering regional dialogue, establishing clear and direct communication channels to prevent miscalculation, and seeking hard-nosed, verifiable agreements that incrementally roll back the most dangerous threats, such as further advances in Iran’s nuclear program and its regional ballistic missile deployments. The international community, including powers with leverage in Tehran, must be rallied not to take sides but to unequivocally advocate for restraint. The collective message must be that while aggression and proliferation are unacceptable, the alternative of total war is a common enemy that will destroy all in its path.

The choice before the international community is now laid bare. One road leads into the fog of war—a fog filled with the echoes of missile fire, the screams of the displaced, and the collapse of economies. It is a path where the very concept of “victory” loses all meaning. The other road, the diplomatic path, is undeniably difficult, fraught with setbacks, and requires immense political courage. It demands negotiating through distrust and managing imperfect outcomes. But it is the only road that leads away from the abyss and toward a future where stability, however fragile, can be rebuilt. The hour is late, but the path forward remains. We must choose diplomacy, not because we believe in the goodness of our adversaries, but because we have stared into the alternative and seen an unbearable catastrophe for all.

By:
Lt Gen Tukur Yusufu Buratai Rtd CFR
Former Chief of Army Staff, Nigerian Army, and former Nigerian Ambassador to the Republic of Benin.

Continue Reading

celebrity radar - gossips

Senator Adeola Yayi Bags Royal Blessings at Foundation Laying of Yewa Traditional Council Secretariat in Ilaro

Published

3 days ago

on

January 28, 2026

By

 

Senator Adeola Yayi Bags Royal Blessings at Foundation Laying of Yewa Traditional Council Secretariat in Ilaro

…Clerics, Monarchs and Political Leaders Offer Prayers for His Future Aspirations

 

 

ILARO-YEWA, OGUN STATE — The ancient town of Ilaro, headquarters of Ogun West Senatorial District, came alive on Tuesday, January 27, 2026, as royal fathers, political leaders, clerics and community stakeholders gathered for the historic foundation-laying ceremony of the proposed ultra-modern Yewa Traditional Council (Obas’) Secretariat Complex.

 

The culturally symbolic project, facilitated by the Senator representing Ogun West at the National Assembly, Distinguished Senator Solomon Olamilekan Adeola (Yayi), attracted widespread commendation, fervent prayers and royal blessings from traditional rulers across Yewaland, alongside leaders and stalwarts of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

 

The ceremony officially marked the commencement of construction of what is envisioned as a state-of-the-art secretariat that will serve as the institutional headquarters of the Yewa Traditional Council.

 

Stakeholders described the initiative as a landmark achievement in institutional development and a clear demonstration of Senator Adeola’s sustained commitment to grassroots development, cultural preservation and inclusive governance in Yewaland.

 

Royal fathers present unanimously agreed that the project represents a significant step toward strengthening traditional governance and preserving Yewa cultural heritage. According to them, the proposed secretariat will function as a unifying administrative hub, enhance collaboration among monarchs and safeguard the cultural identity of the Yewa people for generations to come.

 

 

Speaking at the event, the Olu of Ilaro and Paramount Ruler of Yewaland, His Royal Majesty Oba (Dr.) Kehinde Gbadewole Olugbenle, Asade Agunloye IV, poured encomiums on Senator Adeola for his extensive infrastructural interventions and developmental footprints across Yewaland and Ogun State.

 

The monarch noted that the senator’s contributions have repositioned Yewaland on the path of meaningful progress, urging political leaders and stakeholders to embrace unity, cooperation and harmony.

He emphasized that such collective resolve remains crucial to the long-standing aspiration of producing a Yewa indigene as Governor of Ogun State in 2027.

Oba Olugbenle also used the occasion to encourage residents to actively participate in the democratic process by obtaining their Permanent Voter’s Cards (PVCs), stressing that civic engagement is the surest route to credible leadership.

 

“Yayi Is a Unique Son of Yewaland” — Deputy Speaker

 

The Deputy Speaker of the Ogun State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. (Chief) Mrs. Lateefat Bolanle Ajayi, described Senator Adeola as a “unique and incomparable son of Yewaland,” whose influence transcends Ogun West to Ogun Central and East.

 

“We have had good sons in Yewaland, but Yayi stands out. His impact is felt in Abeokuta, Ijebu-Ode and beyond. Charity truly begins at home. Even the blind can see and the deaf can hear. We must support him. Come 2027, we have a candidate,” she declared.

 

 

Clerics Offer Prayers for Success

Offering prayers at the ceremony, Imam Mohammed Tijani Jamiu, Chief Imam of Surulere Central Mosque, Ilaro-Yewa, prayed for Senator Adeola, the royal fathers of Yewaland and the successful completion of the project.

 

 

 

 

Similarly, Imam Jamiu Adeniyi Kewulere, Chief Imam of Bibire Central Mosque, Oke-Ola, Ilaro-Yewa, also offered special prayers for peace, progress and divine guidance for all stakeholders.

 

 

 

“A Rare Project of Global Significance” — Yewa South LG Chairman

The Chairman of Yewa South Local Government, Hon. Tunde Ogunshola, described the occasion as one of the happiest moments of his life, noting that the project is unprecedented in scope and cultural significance

 

.

“This traditional council building is rare, even globally. It is being realized through the support of Governor Prince Dapo Abiodun and facilitated by Senator Adeola. When completed, it will stand as a lasting symbol of our heritage,” he said.

 

 

 

The Ogun State Chairman of Cultural Development, Hon. Olayiwola Taiwo, also hailed the project as a major turnaround for Ogun West, a zone he said had endured years of infrastructural neglect.

 

“This is a remarkable development. Senator Adeola is truly God-sent to Yewaland,” he stated.

 

 

 

 

Royal fathers including the Olofin Adimula of Ado-Odo, Oba Idris Olusola Lamidi Osolo, the Abepa of Joga-Orile, Oba Adeyemi Adekeye, and the Onimeko of Imeko, Oba Benjamin Olanite, all expressed confidence that greater projects linked to Senator Adeola would continue to materialize.

 

 

 

 

A retired Director-General in the Ogun State Civil Service, Mr. Michael Babatunde Ajayi, likened the proposed complex to the Obas’ Secretariat in Abeokuta, noting that it would reduce the need for monarchs in Yewaland to travel to the state capital for meetings.

“This will be the first of its kind in Yewaland. Kudos to Senator Adeola, whose impact is felt across Ogun State,” he said.

 

 

 

 

APC Leaders Call for Political Mobilisation

The Ogun West APC Chairman, Alhaji Azeez Adisa (Ekwume), alongside party leaders and community stakeholders, described Senator Adeola’s interventions as purposeful and impactful.

 

 

 

 

They urged party members to consolidate these gains by strengthening party structures and participating actively in voter registration and mop-up exercises, noting that broad-based participation is essential for electoral success.

 

 

 

 

Anglican Bishop Describes Project as Timely

Speaking with journalists, the Diocesan Bishop of the Anglican Communion, Rt. Revd. M.A. Oluwarohunbi, PhD, described the project as timely and symbolic, adding that it would enhance the role of traditional rulers in governance.

 

 

 

 

“This is a very important day in the history of Ilaro and Yewaland. The proposed complex will be an ultra-modern edifice befitting our royal fathers,” he said.

 

 

 

He also prayed for Senator Adeola’s continued strength and the realization of his future aspirations.

 

 

 

 

At the climax of the event, Oba Olugbenle, alongside other eminent kabiyesis, offered royal prayers and blessings for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Governor Prince Dapo Abiodun, Senator Solomon Adeola Yayi, and other political office holders across Ogun West and Nigeria, seeking divine wisdom, protection and success in governance.

The well-attended ceremony drew a diverse audience, including revered monarchs from across Yewaland, political leaders, community stakeholders and religious representatives from Christianity, Islam and traditional institutions.

 

 

 

Members of the League of Yewa-Awori Media Practitioners (LOYAMP) were also prominently represented, led by their National Coordinator, Otunba AbuSatar Idowu Hamed.

 

 

 

 

The colourful event concluded with the formal laying of the foundation stone by royal fathers and distinguished guests, symbolically ushering in a new chapter in the institutional development and cultural renaissance of Yewaland—an occasion many described as another defining milestone in Senator Adeola Yayi’s growing legacy of service and development.

 

 

Courtesy: League of Yewa-Awori Media Practitioners (LOYAMP)

Continue Reading

celebrity radar - gossips

Shadows of Greed: Alison‑Madueke’s UK Corruption Trial and the Cost of Power

Published

3 days ago

on

January 28, 2026

By

Shadows of Greed: Alison‑Madueke’s UK Corruption Trial and the Cost of Power

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

When today’s headlines speak of corruption, they often do so as a distant abstraction as a vague moral failure with little bearing on everyday life. But the unfolding corruption trial of Diezani Alison‑Madueke in a London court throws into glaring relief the real, human and systemic consequences of unchecked power merged with self‑interest. This is not merely the story of an individual on trial; it is a lens through which the world must scrutinise the fragile intersection of governance, resource wealth and public trust.

 

Diezani Alison‑Madueke, once Nigeria’s Minister of Petroleum Resources and later the first woman president of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), now stands accused before Britain’s Southwark Crown Court of multiple counts of bribery and conspiracy. The accusations against her (which she vehemently denies) paint a portrait of opulence allegedly funded through pay‑to‑play politics that ignored the public good and rewarded those who could feed her lavish lifestyle.

A Life in Oil, a Life Under Scrutiny.

Alison‑Madueke’s tenure as petroleum minister, from twenty ten until twenty fifteen, coincided with a period of immense oil revenue for Nigeria, a country sitting atop the largest oil reserves in Africa. Yet that wealth did not translate into broad‑based prosperity for the citizens she was meant to serve. Instead, British prosecutors allege that her privileged access to that sector was exploited for personal gain.

 

According to court indictments, she is accused of accepting bribes not in vague promises, but in concrete, high‑value luxury benefits and including cash, chauffeur‑driven vehicles, private jet travel, the use of multiple high‑end properties in London, funded renovations, personal household staff and even costly designer goods purchased at establishments like Harrods and Louis Vuitton. Prosecutors told the court these were not mere gifts, but “financial or other advantages” given by industry players “who clearly believed she would use her influence to favour them.”

 

The former minister, now sixty‑five, has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Alongside her in the dock are two co‑defendants: oil executive Olatimbo Ayinde and her brother, Doye Agama, both of whom deny the charges connected to the same alleged bribery scheme.

 

The Anatomy of Allegations.

What makes this trial especially significant is the detail and scale of the alleged benefits. Prosecutors have asserted that Alison‑Madueke was offered:

 

Access to luxury homes and private residences in London, bought and maintained by associates seeking lucrative Nigerian contracts.

 

At least a six‑figure sum in direct cash payments.

 

Private jet flights and schooling fees for her children.

 

Vast quantities of luxury goods and services from upscale retailers.

 

While the prosecution concedes it has not yet produced direct evidence that she awarded specific contracts to individuals who should not have had them, it maintains that the acceptance of such benefits by a public official who oversaw multi‑billion‑dollar contracts is inherently improper and contrary to fundamental principles of public service.

 

Voices of Accountability.

The allegations have drawn sharp commentary from observers worldwide who see the trial as emblematic of broader governance challenges across resource‑rich nations.

 

Nigerian social justice advocate Aisha Bello has observed, “Corruption is not a peripheral defect in governance but a corrosive disease that accelerates inequality. When leaders treat public office as a gateway to private treasure, citizens pay with lost opportunities and diminished hope.”

Shadows of Greed: Alison‑Madueke’s UK Corruption Trial and the Cost of Power By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

Similarly, Professor John Githongo, a renowned anti‑corruption scholar, argues that “Transparency and accountability are not optional extras in public administration; they are indispensable pillars of a just society. When the public good is subverted for private gain, the very fabric of trust unravels.”

 

These sentiments resonate deeply in contexts where natural wealth exists alongside persistent challenges in education, healthcare and infrastructure also illustrating that corruption is not an isolated moral failing, but a fundamental impediment to development.

 

Corruption Beyond Borders.

What makes this case notable on the global stage is not just its connection to a former minister, but its international footprint. The United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency (NCA) has taken up the case because many of the alleged transactions (the properties, cash flows, and luxury perks) touched British jurisdiction. This underlines a critical truth: corruption today is not contained by national boundaries. Illicit financial flows, luxury goods, and asset holding often travel across continents, making international cooperation essential in pursuit of justice.

Andy Kelly, head of the NCA’s International Corruption Unit, stated during earlier proceedings that investigations revealed “financial rewards” accepted by Alison‑Madueke that were “suspected to relate to the awarding of multi‑million‑pound contracts.” He emphasised that such impropriety has “devastating consequences for developing nations.”

 

This collaborative legal action reflects a growing global consensus: no public official, regardless of stature, should be beyond accountability. When a former head of state institutions is brought before a foreign court, it is not just a legal milestone but it is a moral affirmation of shared values in the rule of law.

 

The Nigerian Context.

In Nigeria, the oil sector has long been both a blessing and a burden. Despite generating huge revenues, mismanagement and corruption have often undermined potential gains for the wider population. A 2023 report by Nigeria’s statistics agency ranked corruption as one of the most significant challenges facing the country. It is a sobering backdrop that shapes how this trial is interpreted at home and abroad.

 

Former officials and critics alike have noted that transparency in governance is not merely a matter of legality but one of national dignity. As legal scholar Dr. Funke Adekola puts it, “When leaders betray public trust, they erode the very essence of citizenship. Restoring that trust requires not just trials, but systemic reform in values and institutions.”

 

What Lies Ahead.

The trial, expected to stretch over several months of testimony and evidence examination, is itself a test of judicial endurance and political will. It presents complex questions about proof, credibility, and moral accountability. Yet beyond the sterile halls of courtrooms, its wider implications reverberate in global public discourse about how nations manage wealth and how societies hold leaders accountable.

 

For ordinary citizens around the world, this case is riveting not because of luxury houses or private jets, but because it forces a collective reckoning: What price should a society pay when those entrusted with public resources place personal enrichment above national welfare?

 

Summative Insight.

As Diezani Alison‑Madueke’s trial unfolds before the world’s eyes, it stands as a stark reminder that the fight against corruption must be relentless and unflinching. It exposes the corrosive effects of unethical conduct at the highest levels of power and underscores the necessity of accountability, irrespective of nationality or office.

 

In the final analysis, justice is not only about punishment, but about restoring faith in the systems meant to protect the common good. As the British court hears testimony and as evidence is meticulously weighed, the world watches a profound test of justice, one that could shape how future generations understand leadership, integrity and the true cost of power.

Shadows of Greed: Alison‑Madueke’s UK Corruption Trial and the Cost of Power By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

RSS Africa-Newsroom

RSS Unknown Feed

Trending