Connect with us

celebrity radar - gossips

Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy

Published

3 years ago

on

Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy

Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy

Deborah Seyram Adablah, a resident of Accra, has filed a lawsuit against the man she claims to be her “sugar daddy,” Ernest Kwasi Nimako, for allegedly breaching an agreement to care for her.
She has also accused the “sugar daddy” of abuse, sexual harassment, maltreatment, exploitation, and degrading her reputation, as well as claiming that she was forced into the relationship during her national service. Deborah Seyram Adablah, in a suit filed on January 23, 2023, at the Accra High Court, claims that her “sugar daddy” [name withheld] agreed to buy her a car, pay for her housing for three years, give her a monthly stipend of GH3,000, marry her after divorcing his wife, and give her a lump sum to start a business.
Side Chick Sues Sugar Daddy
Her claim is that although the “sugar daddy” purchased the car and registered it in his name, he has taken the car back, denying her access to use it after about a year of using the Honda Civic worth GH120,000 while he also paid for only one year’s worth of housing.
Reliefs
the plaintiff seeks a court order directing the “sugar daddy” to transfer the title of the vehicle into her name and return the vehicle.
She also asks the court to order the defendant to pay her the fixed sum so she can “start a business to support herself, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the defendant.”
The court should also order the “sugar daddy” to pay the two years of unpaid rent, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the defendant.
Again, she requests that the court order the defendant to pay her medical bills as a result of a “side effect of a family planning treatment” that the defendant advised her to undergo in order to prevent pregnancy.
a) An order requiring the first defendant to transfer title to vehicle No. GC-7899-21 in the name of the plaintiff and/or an order directing the DVLA to register the vehicle in the plaintiff’s name.
b) A GH10,000.00 refund of the cost of repairs that the first Defendant promised to refund to the plaintiff but neglected to do so.
c) An order requiring the defendants to pay the following to the plaintiff:
(i) The 1st Defendant pays a lump sum to the plaintiff, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the 1st Defendant, so that the plaintiff can establish a business to support herself.
ii) The 1st Defendant pays the remaining two (2) years of rent for the Plaintiff’s housing or pays the same amount for the remaining two (2) years at the same rate for alternative housing.
(iii) The first Defendant shall pay the outstanding arrears of the Plaintiff’s monthly allowance from July 2022 to the date of judgement, as well as all medical expenses incurred as a consequence of the Family Planning treatment’s side effects.
General damages were awarded against the defendants.
(d) Any additional relief the court deems appropriate, including legal fees
The plaintiff contends that in exchange for the first defendant’s assurances that he would leave the bank and not enter into a contract, the first defendant made the following representations and promises to the plaintiff:
• Lump-sum working capital for business startup
• Pay her housing or rent for three years.
• Acquire her a car.
• Provide GH3,000.00 per month.
• Give the plaintiff a ring.
• Pay her medical and other bills, including the cost of a family planning treatment to prevent her from becoming pregnant in the near future.
• To marry Plaintiff after divorcing his wife during their parlour relationship because the first defendant’s relationship with his wife was challenged with irreconcilable differences and the marriage had broken down beyond repair or reconciliation.
Affirmation of Claim
1. The plaintiff is a jobless woman living in Labadi, Accra.
2. The first Defendant is a director of finance at the Accra headquarters of the second Defendant bank.
3. The second Defendant is a bank or financial institution registered under the laws of the Republic of Ghana with its registered office in Accra, which employs the first Defendant and where the plaintiff worked as a National Service employee until she left the bank.
4. Plaintiff asserts that she worked for the 2nd Defendant bank as National Service personnel and that the 1st Defendant was her supervisor as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at the 2nd Defendant bank.
5. Plaintiff asserts that on or around 10/10/2020, she was assigned to the 2nd Defendant bank’s Head Office to perform her National Service, where the 1st Defendant worked as the Head of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
6. The plaintiff asserts that she and the first Defendant engaged in a parlour relationship during her national service. Plaintiff asserts that the relationship began as a result of persistent sexual harassment and abuse by the 1st Defendant, a superior officer who exerted a great deal of power, to which the plaintiff eventually gave in, without which she would have found working in the office of the 2nd Defendant to be a living hell.
7. Plaintiff asserts that when she began working for the second Defendant bank, she witnessed persistent sexual harassment by senior male officers against female bank employees and that if you refused to comply with their demands, your life in the bank became unhappy, uncomfortable, and hostile. Plaintiff asserts that virtually every senior manager has a fiancée at the bank and that they are free to switch partners with the knowledge of the managers of the second defendant bank. They also use us, the female staff, to make sexual advances on extremely wealthy customers with the intention of seducing them into opening bank accounts to our detriment.
8. Plaintiff asserts that she had no choice but to fall victim to the 1st Defendant and consent to a parlour relationship with the 1st Defendant in light of the persistent sexual harassment and abuse perpetrated by the 15th Defendant against her. The second Defendant allegedly did nothing to stop the harassment and abuse but instead encouraged it through her inaction. Plaintiff asserts that, as her employer, 2nd Defendant owed her a duty of care, which 2nd Defendant breached, and, to make matters worse, 2nd Defendant also pressured her to reach out to male customers in exchange for opening bank accounts with intercourse.
9. Plaintiff asserts that her relationship with the Parlour was open and known to nearly all employees of the 2nd Defendant bank and the 2nd Defendant. Not only was the 2nd Defendant aware of the plaintiff’s unholy and problematic work relationship, but it was the norm in the 2nd Defendant’s bank, and the 2nd Defendant did nothing to protect his or her female employees, including the Plaintiff.
10. Plaintiff asserts that, at the time she joined as National Service personnel, there was a married woman employee who was also harassed and gave in, and that this was an open secret in the bank, known by all the employees, and that no one can question this because you risk losing your job with the second defendant bank.
11. Plaintiff asserts that no employee is willing to testify to this effect because they all fear losing their employment. This is a single battle that the plaintiff fights in the hope that many female workers will be liberated from their servitude.
Plaintiff asserts that, at all relevant times, the 2nd Defendant owed a duty of care to its employees, particularly female employees who were perpetually sexually harassed and abused in the workplace with the knowledge of the 2nd Defendant, who watched and encouraged the same since all the top executives were involved in these sex matches, including the Plaintiff’s own with the 1st defendant.
According to the Labour Act of Ghana, the second defendant owed certain duties to her employees, and the employees’ rights were violated by the second defendant.
12. The plaintiff asserts that she was not the only person performing National Service during the period in question. She had other coworkers performing National Service at roughly the same time. Plaintiff asserts that when National Service was about to conclude, National Service personnel, including herself and her colleagues, were about to be hired by the bank as Contract Employees.
13. Plaintiff asserts that the 1st defendant, having abused his position as Chief Financial Officer (CFO), harassed her into accepting a parlour relationship and persuaded her to leave the bank despite the fact that she and her coworkers had the opportunity to continue as Contract Staff so that they could continue the parlour relationship at an enticing compensation.
14. Plaintiff received all assurances from the first defendant to leave the bank and not sign a contract, and in exchange, the first defendant made representations and assurances to the plaintiff that he would provide the following:
• Lump-sum working capital for business startup
• Pay her housing or rent for three years.
• Acquire her a car.
• Provide GH3,000.00 per month.
• Give the plaintiff a ring.
• Pay her medical and other bills, including the cost of a family planning treatment to prevent her from becoming pregnant in the near future.
• To marry Plaintiff after divorcing his wife during their parlour relationship because the first defendant’s relationship with his wife was challenged with irreconcilable differences and the marriage had broken down beyond repair or reconciliation.
Typically, to care for the plaintiff
15. Plaintiff asserts that based on these representations, when her colleagues were hired on Contract, she did not even apply for the position and left upon completion of her National Service in July 2021. The plaintiff also consented to a parlour relationship with the first defendant prior to their marriage.
16. Plaintiff asserts that, having undertaken and agreed to carry out her portion of the agreement as stated in paragraphs 14 and 15 of this complaint, the 15th defendant also agreed to carry out his portion of the agreement.
17. Plaintiff asserts that, in accordance with the 15th defendant’s representations and assurances, he provided the plaintiff with a two-bedroom flat at a monthly rental rate of GH1,500 and paid the first year’s rent, leaving an outstanding two years’ rent of H/No.GL-010-0745 Labadi, Accra, which the plaintiff is still occupying at the time of the issuance of this Writ and which is due to be renewed. The plaintiff has been taken to the rent control office for eviction.
18. Plaintiff asserts that the 1st Defendant also began paying the Plaintiff a monthly stipend, allowance, or salary of GH3,000 per month and continued to do so until July 2022, when the parties began having differences and the 1st Defendant is now in arrears of payment at the time of issuing this Writ.
19. Additionally, the first Defendant asked the Plaintiff to search for a vehicle so that he could pay for it. Plaintiff contacted a car dealer and purchased a vehicle, i.e., A home-used and unregistered Honda Civic. Plaintiff negotiated a price of GH120,000, after which she referred the car dealer to the 1st defendant, who paid for the vehicle, registered it, and gave the keys to the Plaintiff, who has been driving it for about a year.
20. Plaintiff further alleges that the 1st Defendant, in order to ensure that he monitored Plaintiff’s movement and to have a monopoly over her, installed a monitoring device, i.e., a tracking device, in Plaintiff’s car and monitored Plaintiff everywhere she went, even when he was out of the country. He can stop the car at his whim.
21. Plaintiff asserts that, in furtherance of the First Defendant’s desire to engage in carnal activity, the Second Defendant had intercourse with her without protection from the 1st defendant and subjected the plaintiff to a hazardous medical family planning treatment, despite the parties’ knowledge of the risk, which she brought to the 1st defendant’s attention. Therefore, the first Defendant paid for the plaintiff’s family planning treatment at Marie Stopes Clinic Kokomlemle, Accra, as well as her medical expenses each time she experienced excessive bleeding as a result of the Family Planning injection.
Recently, the plaintiff experienced similar excessive haemorrhaging and contacted the first Defendant, who refused to pay for treatment. The plaintiff has been experiencing complications and has sought treatment at both Trust Hospital and 37 Military Hospital.
22. Plaintiff had to appear to be a secretary in the office called Emefa whenever the 1st Defendant’s wife called, per the instructions of the 1st Defendant, to confirm to the plaintiff that his marriage had indeed been challenged.
Insofar as the wife contacted the plaintiff to verify the story.
23. The plaintiff alleges that she and the first defendant have been having relationship-related disagreements as of late. 15 The defendant desired abnormal carnal knowledge of the plaintiff, but the plaintiff refused.
This continued recurrently, and the parties’ differences widened.
24. Plaintiff asserts that the first defendant made requests of a similar nature that were not in accordance with societal norms. The plaintiff and the first defendant subsequently met and decided to terminate their relationship.
25. The parties reached an agreement for the first Defendant to compensate the Plaintiff at one of these meetings held at Brasa Restaurant. Fearing that this may be denied in the future by either party, the plaintiff requested that an audio or video recording be made of the understanding or agreements reached at the meeting. Plaintiff and the first defendant sent Plaintiff text messages indicating that their agreement is available and will be presented at trial.
26. Plaintiff asserts that on one occasion, while the first defendant was out of the country in Dubai, the first defendant used the tracking device to forcibly stop his vehicle while he was driving on the road, posing a life-threatening situation. Plaintiff agreed to repair the car or be reimbursed by the first Defendant. However, when the plaintiff repaired the car and informed the first Defendant, he instead went to the Mechanic and sprayers and showed them the documents of the car, indicating his name as the owner of the car. The first Defendant insisted on retrieving the vehicle, but the mechanic, welder, and sprayer denied him access. The plaintiff asserts that the Welder was paid GH10, 000.00 in total. The plaintiff paid GH500.00 for the mechanic’s parts and labour, GH6500, and GH3, 000.00 for the sprayer, but they have not issued a receipt despite repeated requests.
27. Plaintiff asserts that it wasn’t until this time that she realised the vehicle was not registered in her name. The plaintiff asserts that this was unexpected. The plaintiff also instructed the mechanics and sprayers to file a police report, which they did. However, the first Defendant has threatened them, so they will not want to be involved in this case.
28. Plaintiff asserts that she instructed her attorneys to discuss this with the 1st defendant’s attorneys, but that the 1st defendant was willing to change the title of the car he purchased for the Plaintiff into the Plaintiff’s name and pay a portion of the medical expenses, but not all of them, resulting in this lawsuit.
29. The plaintiff also went to the DOVVSU at the police headquarters, but the police did not provide her with the necessary assistance.
30. The plaintiff then instructed her attorney to assume the case, and her attorney wrote to the first Defendant in an attempt to reach a settlement, but the first Defendant failed, refused, or failed to settle.
31. Plaintiff asserts that after 1st Defendant received the notice from her Lawyer, 1st Defendant filed a theft complaint at a police station and was accompanied by the head of 2nd defendant’s security, […], who led the police team to besiege her house, forcibly take the vehicle, and tow it to the Greater Accra Regional Police Station on a working day. Plaintiff possesses photographs and videos of the 1st Defendant and the 2nd Defendant’s representative (Daniel Afrifa), who led the police to invade Plaintiff’s residence, humiliated her, and left her in a constant state of shock, tarnishing her reputation in the eyes of the law-abiding members of her community, Labadi-Lamptey George.
32. The plaintiff was shocked to learn that she was being accused of stealing the automobile that the first defendant purchased for her during their relationship. Police met both parties, including the director of the second Defendant’s security, who participated actively and at one point challenged the crime officer, who condemned the arrest of his officers and the defendants. After listening to the parties, the police determined that the defendants misled them into acting since they believed that was not theft, and they returned the vehicle to the plaintiff.
33. Plaintiff asserts that the police and the defendants humiliated her at her residence, causing her acquaintances to stare at her, the police to assault her, and the incident to be reported to the Labadi Police Station. All of this was done in bad faith, and the defendants led the police to maliciously arrest and prosecute her for a crime they knew she did not commit.
34. As a result of the malicious behaviour demonstrated by the defendants, the plaintiff has experienced a shock, and this treatment has affected her for some time and continues to haunt her. Fingers continue to be pointed at her.
35. Plaintiff asserts that the police released her vehicle days later. The attorney for the first defendant then responded to the letter by denying the claims.
36. Plaintiff alleges that she has been used, abused, maltreated, exploited, deceived, disappointed, failed, and degraded as a result of defendants’ actions. Plaintiff was also repeatedly verbally threatened by the first Defendant, who also sent her threatening text messages that placed her life in danger, as evidenced by her Statement to the Police.
37. The conduct of the Defendants has harmed the Plaintiff and diminished her reputation and standing in her community. Furthermore, the first Defendant has failed to carry out their understandings, arrangements, promises, and/or agreements, and he will continue his permanent refusal unless compelled by this honourable court.
38. Therefore, the Plaintiff asserts the following claims against the defendants:
39. a) An order requiring the first defendant to transfer title to vehicle No. GC-7899-21 in the name of the plaintiff and/or an order directing the DVLA to register the vehicle in the plaintiff’s name.
40. b) A GH10,000.00 refund of the cost of repairs that the first Defendant promised to refund to the plaintiff but neglected to do so.
41. c) An order requiring the defendants to pay the following to the plaintiff:
(i) The 1st Defendant pays a lump sum to the plaintiff, as agreed upon by the plaintiff and the 1st Defendant, so that the plaintiff can establish a business to support herself.
(ii) The 1st Defendant pays the remaining two years of rent for the Plaintiff’s housing or pays the same amount for the remaining two years at the same rate for alternative housing.
(iii) The first Defendant shall pay the outstanding arrears of the Plaintiff’s monthly allowance from July 2022 to the date of judgement, as well as all medical expenses incurred as a consequence of the Family Planning treatment’s side effects.
General damages were awarded against the defendants.
(d) Any additional relief the court deems appropriate, including legal fees
conclusion, If you or someone you know has experienced sexual harassment, it’s important to take it seriously and seek help if needed. Sexual harassment is unacceptable behaviour, and it can have serious consequences for the victim’s physical and emotional well-being. It’s important to remember that sexual harassment can happen to anyone, regardless of gender, age, or occupation. It can take many different forms, from unwanted touching to inappropriate comments or gestures. If you or someone you know has been sexually harassed, it’s important to speak up and report the behaviour to the appropriate authorities. You may also want to seek counselling or support from a trusted friend or family member.
It’s also important to remember that sexual harassment is a form of discrimination and is illegal in many countries. Victims of sexual harassment have legal rights and protections, and they may be entitled to compensation for any harm they have suffered as a result of the harassment. Sexual harassment is a serious issue that should not be ignored. If you or someone you know has experienced sexual harassment, it’s important to take steps to address the behaviour and seek help if necessary because the case stated above is a clear example of what ladies or young ladies go through in Ghana.
Related Topics:

Sahara weekly online is published by First Sahara weekly international. contact [email protected]

Continue Reading
Advertisement

celebrity radar - gossips

PRESIDENT TINUBU CONGRATULATES OTEGA OGRA ON ELECTION TO WORLD FEDERATION OF ADVERTISERS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Published

2 days ago

on

April 21, 2026

By

PRESIDENT TINUBU CONGRATULATES OTEGA OGRA ON ELECTION TO WORLD FEDERATION OF ADVERTISERS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

PRESIDENT TINUBU CONGRATULATES OTEGA OGRA ON ELECTION TO WORLD FEDERATION OF ADVERTISERS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

 

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has congratulated his Senior Special Assistant on Digital Engagement, Strategy and New Media, Mr Otega Ogra, on his election to the Executive Committee of the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA).

 

The election took place today at the organisation’s Annual General Meeting, held during the Global Marketing Week Conference in Stockholm, Sweden.

PRESIDENT TINUBU CONGRATULATES OTEGA OGRA ON ELECTION TO WORLD FEDERATION OF ADVERTISERS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

President Tinubu described the development as a significant step for Nigeria’s growing influence in global communications.

 

He noted that Mr Ogra’s emergence as the only representative from West Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa on the Executive Committee reflects the depth of Nigerian expertise and the contribution of a new generation of young Nigerian professionals to global industry standards.

 

Mr Ogra was elected to the Executive Committee on the platform of the Advertisers Association of Nigeria (ADVAN), underscoring the role of Nigeria’s organised advertising and marketing industry in shaping representation at the global level.

 

The WFA is the leading global body for advertisers, representing over 150 multinational and Fortune 500 companies, alongside national advertiser associations across more than 60 countries, with a combined annual marketing spend running into hundreds of billions of dollars. Its Executive Committee is the organisation’s highest decision-making body, responsible for setting priorities and guiding global policy on responsible advertising, media transparency, sustainability, and the evolution of digital ecosystems.

 

President Tinubu noted that Mr Ogra’s election is both a personal distinction and a strategic opportunity for Nigeria and the African continent, placing them at the centre of global conversations on brand trust, platform accountability, innovation and the future of marketing and communications.

 

The President commended Mr Ogra, who also serves as Vice President of ADVAN, for his sustained contributions to strengthening Nigeria’s marketing and communications ecosystem, drawing on a career spanning leadership roles across the banking, manufacturing, and public sectors.

 

“Otega’s election reflects the growing recognition of Nigerian expertise and affirms our capacity to contribute meaningfully to the frameworks shaping global markets,” the President said.

 

President Tinubu added that the achievement aligns with his administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda, particularly in advancing the creative economy, strengthening digital governance, and positioning Nigeria as a competitive hub for innovation and enterprise.

 

Josh Faulks, CEO of the Australian advertiser association (AANA), and Simon Michaelides, Director General of the UK advertiser association (ISBA), also join the leadership team.

 

Current members of the executive committee, David Wheldon, President and Philip Myers, Deputy President, who is also the Chief Institutional Affairs and Corporate Communications Officer at Ferrero, continue in their current roles, as do all regional vice presidents.

 

 

Continue Reading

celebrity radar - gossips

Hold Peter Okoye Responsible If Any Harm Comes To Our Member – NASRE Fires Back At Singer

Published

3 days ago

on

April 20, 2026

By

Hold Peter Okoye Responsible If Any Harm Comes To Our Member – NASRE Fires Back At Singer

Hold Peter Okoye Responsible If Any Harm Comes To Our Member – NASRE Fires Back At Singer

 

 

The Nigerian Association of Social and Resourceful Editors (NASRE) has raised alarm over an alleged threat by Afrobeat artist Peter Okoye (Mr P) against journalist and NASRE Directorate member, Mr Bayo Adetu, warning that the singer will be held responsible should any harm come to the journalist or his family.

Hold Peter Okoye Responsible If Any Harm Comes To Our Member – NASRE Fires Back At Singer

 

In a press statement issued on April 20, 2026, NASRE’s leadership, led by Comrade Femi Oyewale, expressed concern over the incident reportedly occurring at the Ikoyi High Court during proceedings in the ongoing legal dispute involving P-Square and their elder brother, Jude Okoye.

 

 

NASRE views the alleged statement as inappropriate and unacceptable, stating that any language suggesting intimidation against a journalist performing lawful duties raises serious concerns about press freedom, safety, and professional ethics.

 

 

The association has therefore called on Mr Peter Okoye to retract the alleged statement and issue a public apology to Mr Bayo Adetu, while also urging all parties involved in the ongoing legal matter to conduct themselves with restraint, respect, and strict adherence to the rule of law.

Read the statement below:

PRESS STATEMENT
For Immediate Release

NASRE RAISES ALARM OVER ALLEGED THREAT BY PETER OKOYE (MR P) AGAINST BAYO ADETU IN COURT, WARNS OF CONSEQUENCES

The leadership of the Nigerian Association of Social and Resourceful Editors (NASRE), led by Comrade Femi Oyewale, expresses concern over an alleged threat issued by popular Afrobeat artist Peter Okoye, widely known as Mr P, against journalist and NASRE Directorate member, Mr Bayo Adetu.

The incident reportedly occurred at the Ikoyi High Court during proceedings in the ongoing legal dispute involving the music duo P-Square and their elder brother, Jude Okoye. Eyewitnesses present in court stated that Mr Peter Okoye drew the attention of Justice Alexander Owoeye to Mr Adetu’s presence, noting that he was formerly P-Square’s publicist but now works with his brothers. The remark reportedly generated reactions in the courtroom.

It is further alleged that after the court session, Mr Peter Okoye confronted Mr Adetu in the presence of others and said, “You, Bayo, I will set you up.”

NASRE views this alleged statement as inappropriate and unacceptable. Any language suggesting harm or intimidation directed at a journalist performing lawful duties raises serious concerns regarding press freedom, safety, and professional ethics.

We state unequivocally that should anything happen to Mr Bayo Adetu or any member of his family, Mr Peter Okoye will be held accountable. Such statements, when directed at a media professional, are taken with utmost seriousness.

NASRE will not tolerate any form of intimidation, harassment, or threat against its members. We are fully prepared to activate all lawful media and legal channels to protect our members and safeguard the integrity of the profession. Mr Peter Okoye must be aware that utterances of this nature carry consequences and he will be held responsible for any outcome arising from this matter.

We therefore call on Mr Peter Okoye to retract the alleged statement and issue a public apology to Mr Bayo Adetu. We also urge all parties involved in the ongoing matter to conduct themselves with restraint, respect, and strict adherence to the rule of law.

The safety of journalists remains paramount, and the media will not be silenced.

Signed:
Lateef Owodunni
Media Director, NASRE
April 20, 2026

Continue Reading

celebrity radar - gossips

Fuji Star, Saheed Osupa Addresses Prado Controversy, Says Vehicle Was Compensation — Not Political Gift

Published

4 days ago

on

April 19, 2026

By

Fuji Star, Saheed Osupa Addresses Prado Controversy, Says Vehicle Was Compensation — Not Political Gift

By Alhaji Arems (Baba Fuji)

 

 

Nigerian Fuji star Saheed Osupa has responded to a wave of political controversy surrounding his recent campaign appearance in Oyo State, clarifying that a vehicle linked to the debate was not a political gift but compensation tied to a professional engagement.

The backlash followed the circulation of a Facebook Reel showing Osupa performing at an event associated with Sharafadeen Alli, who has declared interest in the Oyo State governorship under the All Progressives Congress (APC). As the video gained traction, it sparked renewed scrutiny over entertainers’ roles in political campaigns and the assumptions that often follow such appearances.

Amid the reactions, individuals aligned with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) circulated claims on social media alleging that Osupa, alongside gospel artist Yinka Ayefele, had previously received luxury vehicles from the administration of Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde. The claims, which remain unverified, framed the alleged gesture as an example of questionable public spending and raised concerns about political loyalty.

Osupa has since pushed back against that narrative, offering a different account of events. In a video statement, the artist explained that his involvement in the campaign was strictly professional, based on a negotiated performance agreement rather than any form of political alignment.

According to him, he was engaged to perform at campaign events with assurances that he would be adequately compensated after the election. He, however, alleged that those commitments were not fulfilled following the electoral victory.

Addressing the controversy surrounding the vehicle, Osupa stated that his personal car was damaged during the course of the campaign. He said the replacement vehicle later provided to him was intended as compensation for that loss, not a discretionary gift or political reward.

His response reframes the discussion from one of political patronage to a dispute over professional obligations—an important distinction in an environment where entertainers are frequently enlisted to support campaign visibility.

The episode highlights a recurring tension within Nigeria’s political landscape: the blurred line between performance and perceived allegiance. For artists, participation in campaign activities can quickly shift from paid engagement to public endorsement in the eyes of observers, particularly when details of such arrangements are not clearly communicated.

Osupa’s clarification brings that tension into focus, underscoring how easily professional engagements can be recast within political narratives. As conversations continue, the situation points to a broader need for transparency in the relationship between public figures and political actors—especially in moments where perception can carry as much weight as fact.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

RSS Africa-Newsroom

RSS APO Group – Africa-Newsroom: latest news releases related to Africa

Trending