Connect with us

society

Stand Together, Not Apart: Solidarity for MNK October 20, 2025

Published

on

Stand Together, Not Apart: Solidarity for MNK October 20, 2025. 

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | saharaweeklyng.com

“One Day. One Demand. Free MNK, Justice Now.”

 

On Monday, October 20, 2025, Nigerians and friends of justice the world over will again test the promise of democratic life in our country, the promise that the right to assemble, to petition and to demand accountability will not be shrugged aside by injunctions, intimidation or the heavy hand of the state. The #FreeMaziNnamdiKanuNow (MNK) mobilisations (organised by civil society activists, diaspora groups and political figures) present a simple, unavoidable demand, that a man who has become the symbol of a larger grievance be afforded due process, humane treatment and a transparent justice system. The stakes are bigger than one man; they are about whether Nigeria honours the rule of law and the dignity of dissent.

 

This piece argues, plainly and insistently, that solidarity for MNK’s peaceful protest is not an act of tribalism or lawlessness. It is an affirmation of democratic principle; one that citizens and international partners should support, monitor and protect. It also explains why peaceful solidarity is needed now, what the legal and security context is and how Nigerians and the global community should respond to ensure the exercise of legitimate rights without violence.

 

The legal and security reality: official warnings, court orders and real risk.

In the run-up to October 20, authorities and external actors have signalled caution. A High Court ruling and subsequent court orders have sought to restrict protests in sensitive locations around Aso Rock, the National Assembly complex and other government precincts, creating a legal fence that organisers and lawyers are actively contesting. The fact of that court action is not in dispute and must be acknowledged by anyone calling for or supporting public demonstrations.

 

Foreign missions have taken the prospect of large demonstrations seriously, the United States Embassy issued a security alert to its citizens about potential demonstrations on October 20, warning of possible roadblocks, disruptions and confrontation risks. That is a sober reminder that mass protests in Nigeria (as in many countries) can attract opportunists, security countermeasures and flashpoints where peace can be lost.

 

Though caution is not a licence for suppression. The Nigeria Police Force has publicly affirmed that the right to peaceful protest is inalienable while also urging that assemblies remain within the bounds of court orders and law. This dual message underscores the difficult tightrope, authorities must protect public order without weaponising the law to choke civic space.

 

Why solidarity matters – beyond headlines and hashtags.

Solidarity for MNK on October 20 is not merely performative. It is an essential democratic corrective for at least three reasons.

 

First, it centres due process and transparency. Calls for MNK’s release are also calls for a legal process free from clouded procedures, secret detention or politicised prosecutions. When civil society (inside and outside Nigeria) mobilises, it forces scrutiny and sunlight onto legal proceedings that might otherwise proceed behind closed doors. Prominent Nigerians and civic organisations have argued that the manner of his detention and treatment should raise questions about the fairness of our system.

 

Second, solidarity is a check on the use of force. International human-rights organisations and past reporting have documented instances where security forces used lethal force against protesters in Nigeria; a grim memory that must inform how authorities and protesters conduct themselves now. Amnesty International’s recent investigations into excessive force during Nigeria’s protests in 2024 and earlier incidents in the southeast are a clarion call: both citizens and the state must prevent a replay of violence. If Nigerians are to trust the system, the state must demonstrate restraint and accountability.

 

Third, unity in dissent breaks the toxic narrative that activism is regional or ethnic. Organisers including mainstream activists have intentionally framed October 20 as a peaceful, national campaign for justice; an invitation for citizens across ethnic and political lines to stand for the rule of law. That is a powerful antidote to deliberate attempts to paint protest as sectarian agitation.

 

What solidarity should look like; principled, legal, and strategic.

Solidarity must be disciplined. Here are practical, non-negotiable rules for those who will stand with MNK:

 

Non-violence first. Any legitimate protest that turns violent hands the state an excuse to crush civic space. Organisers and participants must unequivocally commit to peaceful methods: marches, silent vigils, legal petitions and sit-ins not property damage or attacks on people.

 

Legal preparedness. Support legal teams that can rapidly challenge unlawful injunctions, provide bail funds and document any rights violations. Use professional lawyers; do not rely solely on social-media lawyers.

 

Documentation and monitoring. Independent monitors, press and human-rights groups should document events in real time. If arrests or use of force occur, filmed evidence and credible eyewitness accounts are the oxygen of accountability.

 

Clear messaging. Keep the demands specific: humane treatment, transparent legal process, respect for court rulings unless overturned by due process and investigations into any extrajudicial conduct. Avoid incendiary language that can be exploited by those seeking to delegitimise the cause.

 

International pressure, not intervention. Engage international human-rights bodies and foreign missions to pressure for transparent judicial process and protection of protest rights, while rejecting outside military or clandestine interference.

 

Voices that matter.

Human-rights advocates and UN special rapporteurs have warned against criminalising dissent and delegitimising protest movements globally; a warning that resonates in Nigeria today. Mary Lawlor, the UN Special Rapporteur on human-rights defenders, has documented a worrying trend of state repression of peaceful activists in recent months, noting the grave dangers when governments treat dissent as a security threat rather than a democratic right. Such expert analysis should guide both authorities and citizens toward restraint and respect.

 

At home, elder statesmen and civic leaders who have called for due process stress that the health of our republic depends on the ability to hold power to account without descending into anarchy. The police themselves have said the right to peaceful protest is recognised; a statement whose credibility must be matched by action.

 

The test for our institutions and for Nigerians.

October 20 is a test. It will reveal how robust our institutions are, how committed our security services are to the constitutional order and how mature our civil society can be in the face of provocation. If the state responds with restraint and the organisers maintain discipline, Nigeria will have demonstrated a maturing democratic temperament. If the reverse occurs, the consequences will be ugly; erosion of trust, cycles of recrimination and deeper polarisation.

 

For those of us writing from the press, civil society and the academy: our duty is to report accurately, to demand accountability and to platform credible voices. For the international community: support monitoring and documentation; press for adherence to international human-rights standards. For ordinary Nigerians: stand in principled solidarity; in the markets that close quietly, in vigils and on the line when lawful mobilisation occurs.

 

Closing: justice is indivisible.

Solidarity for MNK is not an endorsement of everything he has said or done. It is not a tribal signal. It is a moral posture: that justice must be visible, that trials must be fair, that detention must follow the law and that peaceful calls for redress deserve protection, not pulverisation. If Nigeria is to be proud of its democracy, it must protect the weakest expression of dissent as fervently as it protects the comforts of power.

 

On October 20, raise your voice; but raise it within the law, with witnesses, with lawyers present and with the unshakable conviction that the cause of justice is indivisible. Stand for due process. Stand for humane treatment. Stand for the principle that no state is strengthened by silencing the people it is meant to serve.

 

George Omagbemi Sylvester is a journalist and commentator. He can be reached via saharaweeklyng.com

 

society

REJOINDER: SECURITY AGENCIES ARE NOT TOOLS OF INTIMIDATION BUT INSTITUTIONS OF JUSTICE

Published

on

REJOINDER: SECURITY AGENCIES ARE NOT TOOLS OF INTIMIDATION BUT INSTITUTIONS OF JUSTICE.

REJOINDER: SECURITY AGENCIES ARE NOT TOOLS OF INTIMIDATION BUT INSTITUTIONS OF JUSTICE.

 

 

The recent publication titled “Enugu Nursing College Faces Backlash for Using DSS, Police to Intimidate Student Nurse for Exposing Oppression” is a clear attempt to sensationalize a matter that is already before lawful authorities and to deliberately further tarnish the image of Ezzy International College of Nursing Sciences through emotional propaganda, half-truths, and social media trial.

 

For the avoidance of
doubt, the Department of State Services (DSS), the Nigeria Police Force, and other security agencies are constitutional institutions established by law to investigate complaints, establish facts, preserve public order, and ensure justice. Their involvement in any matter does not amount to intimidation. Rather, it reflects the lawful pathway for resolving allegations, especially where there are claims of cyber-bullying, defamation, unauthorized recordings, false publications, and dissemination of misleading information capable of damaging institutional reputation and public confidence.

 

REJOINDER: SECURITY AGENCIES ARE NOT TOOLS OF INTIMIDATION BUT INSTITUTIONS OF JUSTICE.

It is therefore surprising that intellectually poor bloggers and such individuals who continuously make public allegations on social media suddenly describe lawful invitations by security agencies as “oppression.” One cannot publish accusations, circulate inflammatory contents online, mobilize public outrage, and then reject legal scrutiny when called upon to substantiate those claims before competent authorities.

Mr. Francis Nwapa and those behind these coordinated media attacks should understand that social media is not a courtroom, and activism requires truths and fairness that must not place anyone above the law. If allegations have been made publicly against Ezzy International College of Nursing Sciences and its leadership, then the proper and civilized response is to appear before the relevant authorities and provide evidence to substantiate such claims instead of resorting to media blackmail and emotional manipulation.

The attempt to portray every lawful investigation as victimisation is both irresponsible and dangerous. Security agencies are not established to entertain sentiments or online noise; they are empowered to determine truth from falsehood through a due process.
Or could it be that Mr.Francis Nwapa and his cohorts assume themselves untouchable and above the law, even when they churn out lies and deceits against legally established institutions on social media? If Nwapa claims to be the coordinator of Youth Rights Campaign (YRC), legal or illegitimate as it seems, should be able to know the duties of the DSS and the Police and accord them same respect. The group should know the law and its process. The group should have a learned legal profiled counsel to respond or educate their ignorance of the law. Needless to say that Mr. Francis Nwapa’s strategy of Cyber-bullying is a game the DSS and the police are so familiar with and cannot be cowed thereof.

The insinuation Mr. Nwapa made about transferring the case to Lagos for his convenience is baseless. He should have defined his jurisdiction before he went uncontrolled on social media space to write what he didnt understand. He should have asked questions on the location of the crime alleged. But, No. He went viral to disburse unfounded information which he claimed happened at a location he never knew. Now, he is being invited to Enugu where the alleged crime was committed, instead of yielding to the state of law, Francis is calling for public sympathy. He insinuates in the writing that investigation procedure be shifted to Lagos to accommodate his reporting ineptitude, rather than at Enugu where the petition and incidents took place. What a myopic view of the procedure! It is pertinent to note that the law does not recognize convenience.

Therefore, if invitations were extended by the DSS or Police, it is only proper for those involved to honour such invitations and clarify the numerous statements and allegations which they already circulated online.

Furthermore, it is important to remind the public that institutions have rules, ethical codes, and disciplinary procedures designed to protect professionalism, patient confidentiality, institutional integrity, and public trust. Unauthorized recording of patients, hospital environments, administrators, or internal communications and broadcasting them online without clearance may raise serious ethical and legal concerns, especially in professional healthcare training institutions.
It is also intellectually dishonest for certain groups to weaponize the current security challenges in Nigeria as an excuse to discredit lawful investigations.

The DSS and Police are capable of handling multiple responsibilities simultaneously, including investigating complaints relating to cyber harassment, defamation, false information, and conduct capable of inciting unrest. Mr. Francis, writing on his blog “Francis Nwapa Watch” on 15th of April called for proper investigation into the matter. The security agents yielded to that call and lunched investigations to establish the truth. Why is Mr. Nwapa afraid to dance the music he started beating its drums? Journalism is an age long profession practiced by men of seasoned value, honesty and integrity to uphold public truths. It is unfortune that Mr. Francis whose only known job is pest control and fumigation dabbled into a noble profession as journalism, untrained and unequipped to investigate truth before misinforming the public. More disheartening is that Francis might not know the huge negative impact he would be making to institutions and the public just because he afforded a cheap phone and data to post unverified information on blogs.

Dr. Gloria C. Bertram-Okoli and the management of Ezzy International College of Nursing Sciences have consistently demonstrated commitment to healthcare education, discipline, and institutional excellence. The college cannot and will not surrender its integrity to orchestrated campaigns of calumny or mob pressure driven by social media theatrics.

The public is therefore urged to disregard attempts to distort facts and to allow lawful authorities to carry out their constitutional duties without intimidation from activist groups seeking publicity. Justice is not established on Facebook posts, WhatsApp broadcasts, or media headlines, but through lawful investigation and evidence.

Meanwhile it is also contempt of the legal process as Mr. Nwapa continues to bully online and misinform the public about a matter which is already under investigation. The police had advised that all parties be invited to respond to questions.

The matter is being followed legally. Mr. Francis will do well to submit to legal procedure.

Those who have made allegations should courageously present their evidence before the appropriate authorities instead of portraying legitimate legal procedures as persecution. Truth does not fear investigation.
—Opinion—

Continue Reading

society

ONDO EAST-WEST FEDERAL CONSTITUENCY APC ADOPTS OTUNBA BOLA FISAYO

Published

on

ONDO EAST-WEST FEDERAL CONSTITUENCY APC ADOPTS OTUNBA BOLA FISAYO

 

Ahead of APC House of Representatives Election scheduled for Saturday 16th of May 2026, Ondo EAST-WEST Federal Constituency stakeholders have adopted Otunba Bola Olawafisayo as its flagbearer.

 

Rising from the stakeholders’ meeting held at Harmony Estate in Ondo city, a source close to Otunba Bola Olawafisayo disclosed that arrangements have been perfect and party members will formally adopt Otunba Bola Olawafisayo on Saturday the very day slated very for the primary.

Continue Reading

society

Excitement as Zamfara Under Governor Lawal Begins Airlift of Pilgrims at Zamfara Airport

Published

on

Excitement as Zamfara Under Governor Lawal Begins Airlift of Pilgrims at Zamfara Airport

 

There is palpable excitement in Zamfara State as the administration of Governor Dauda Lawal officially commenced the 2026 Hajj airlift for pilgrims from the Gusau Airport (GIA). In a historic move aimed at easing the pilgrimage process, the state government announced that the first batch of pilgrims who departed for the Holy Land today, Friday, 15th May 2026.

This milestone marks the fulfillment of Governor Lawal’s promise to make direct departures from Zamfara a reality, eliminating the need for pilgrims to travel to other states for airlift. However, the state government has issued a strict advisory to the public regarding conduct at the airport. To ensure security and facilitate the smooth coordination of the airlift operations, escorting pilgrims to the airport is strictly prohibited.

Family members and friends wishing to bid farewell to their loved ones are directed to do so only at the Hajj Camp. The restriction, according to officials, is a necessary measure to prevent congestion and maintain order at the airport premises. Officials confirm that the airlift is now underway at Gusau International Airport. The development has been met with widespread praise from intending pilgrims, who expressed relief at being able to begin their spiritual journey directly from their home state.

The Zamfara State Government extended its sincere gratitude to Governor Lawal for his commitment, emphasizing that the direct airlift reflects a new chapter of convenience and efficiency for the state’s annual Hajj operations.

 

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending