Connect with us

Business

Why Matrix Energy Should Stop Dancing Naked* By David Tunde

Published

on

Why Matrix Energy Should Stop Dancing Naked* By David Tunde

*Why Matrix Energy Should Stop Dancing Naked*

By David Tunde

 

 

In a flagrant and audacious exhibition of corporate greed and regulatory failure, Matrix Energy Limited, a prominent player in Nigeria’s petroleum industry, led by CEO Abdulkadir Adisa Aliu, has become embroiled in a scandal of monumental proportions involving the importation of subpar fuel products. This disturbing revelation, compounded by the company’s alleged complicity in illicit activities, raises grave concerns regarding the integrity of the Nigerian fuel supply chain and the potential perils to public health and safety.

 

 

 

Through the deliberate importation of blended low-grade petroleum products, which are subsequently sold as high-quality fuel, Matrix Energy is not only jeopardizing lives but also subverts the country’s economic governance framework. Abdulkadir Adisa Aliu, a member of the esteemed Presidential Economic Coordination Council (PEEC), is exploiting his position of influence and proximity to powerful and corrupt individuals in the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) , and The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) Limited to perpetuate these nefarious activities with unbridled impunity.

 

Why Matrix Energy Should Stop Dancing Naked*
By David Tunde

 

Matrix Energy’s operations have been irrefutably linked to Malta, a preeminent European hub for the clandestine blending and ship-to-ship (STS) transfers of sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products. A staggering 35% of shipments arriving in Malta comprise naphtha and other components, which are subsequently blended into petrol to produce “African Spec” products. These products are then transshipped into various vessels for ultimate delivery into Nigeria, perpetuating a complex web of clandestine transactions.

 

 

 

Further investigation reveals that the products from Malta are transported through a labyrinthine network of intermediate ships and companies, including Poly Pro Trading in Dubai. Notably, the listed office of Poly Pro Trading is merely a business center devoid of any physical presence, thereby obfuscating the trail of accountability. This is further complicated by the forgery of paper works and the representation of non-existent companies, which serve as a conduit for these surreptitious transactions and movements.

 

 

The fact that Malta, a country devoid of any known oil refineries, has emerged as the top European destination for blending and ship-to-ship transfers of sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products is a damning indictment of the lack of regulation and oversight in Nigeria’s oil and gas sector. The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has demonstrably failed in its duty to regulate fuel quality, thereby enabling international commodity traders and Nigerian marketers to exploit this regulatory vacuum and import low-quality fuels with impunity.

 

 

 

Regrettably, the presence of unpatriotic individuals such as Adisa Aliu, Farouk Ahmed, Mele Kyari, and their cohorts in positions of decision-making ensures the perpetuation of the rot in our oil and gas sector, which will continue to thrive on a “balanced diet” of corruption and malfeasance. These are people that are ready to run our economy aground with unbridled greed, bigotry, nepotism, and illegalization of Institutional corruption from one catastrophic selfish agenda to the other, under the guise of improving the Oil and gas sector.

 

 

 

It is intriguing to ponder the rationale behind the selection of Russia and Malta as key players in this illicit operation. However, it is hardly surprising, given that these regions, being under international sanctions, lack stringent measures to curb illegal activities, thereby becoming a haven for corrupt individuals worldwide to converge and indulge in nefarious pursuits for their selfish interests.

 

 

 

The fact that Russia was expelled from the SWIFT global banking framework, comprising nearly 12,000 banks, renders any oil and gas transactions between Nigerian companies and Russian refineries illicit, as Russian banks are unable to open letters of credit for exports. This exposes Nigeria to diplomatic crises that could further compound all that we are going through. Consequently, it is no wonder that Malta has emerged as the premier European destination for blending and ship-to-ship (STS) transfers of sanctioned Russian oil and petroleum products, following the Greek navy’s decision to prohibit such activities in their offshore zone.

Notably, diesel from Russia is notoriously off-spec, and diesels from Matrix filling stations have failed the ASTM D4294 test method, which provides a rapid and precise measurement of total sulfur in petroleum and petroleum products with minimal sample preparation. This egregious situation has led to Matrix Energy peddling flammable diesel with toxic fumes to unsuspecting Nigerians, while reaping enormous profits.

The sheer magnitude of Matrix Energy’s operations is staggering, with over 200,000 tons of gasoline products from Malta allegedly discharged into a Jetty owned by Matrix Energy in July 2024. This represents a staggering 25 percent of Nigeria’s monthly PMS consumption, channeled to a relatively small player with a mere 150 retail stations, highlighting the vast scope of this illicit operation.

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) is undoubtedly complicit in the importation of substandard diesel and jet fuel into the country, thereby fueling concerns regarding the quality of products utilized in Nigeria. It is a travesty that Africa’s largest oil-producing nation has been importing inferior petroleum products from Malta, a country devoid of any known oil refineries. The evidence of this egregious act is ubiquitous and glaringly apparent to the federal government, unless they choose to willfully ignore it, even without conducting a thorough investigation into the operations of Adisa Aliu and Matrix Energy.

A cursory examination of the cargo trails, the non-existent Dubai business location, and the Malta-Russia adulterated imported fuel, would reveal the extent of this malfeasance. Furthermore, an investigation into the quality of fuel being dispensed at Matrix Filling stations would provide additional evidence of the nefarious activities. If these investigations are thoroughly conducted, the evil nature of Abdulkadir Adisa Aliu’s actions will be laid bare for all to see. His genocidal actions, posing a significant health hazard to Nigerian citizens, increasing the potential mortality rate due to accidents caused by adulterated fuel, and dilapidating the economy for selfish gains, will be exposed.

Matrix Energy’s recent maneuver to seek judicial protection and restrain media houses and other entities from further publishing revelatory stories about its oil shipping business is a farcical spectacle that ranks as one of the most absurd jokes of the century. This attempt to stifle the dissemination of incriminating information constitutes a blatant assault on the sacrosanct right to free expression, a fundamental tenet of democratic societies. By seeking to muzzle the media and suppress the truth, Matrix Energy is attempting to circumvent accountability and perpetuate its nefarious activities, thereby undermining the very fabric of transparency and public discourse.

Aliu’s “dance of shame” must be met with severe consequences. The shame and disdain brought upon Nigeria must be addressed forthwith. Nigeria must not be perceived as a country of fools. We are aware of the situation, and the President must take decisive action to address this madness. The weakness in regulating fuel quality poses a grave health risk to Nigerians. International commodity traders and Nigerian marketers are exploiting this regulatory vacuum to import low-quality fuels. This is grounds for the President to immediately sanction the regulators responsible for policing the midstream and downstream sector and take action concerning the leadership of the Oil and Gas sector in Nigeria.

It is hardly astonishing that Matrix Energy would resort to extreme measures to protect and shield certain influential benefactors, whose identities and interests remain shrouded in secrecy. The primary motivation behind their decision to institute this lawsuit is to insulate and shield their accomplices within the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) and other members of their clandestine cabal from the scrutiny of the media. By doing so, Matrix Energy seeks to conceal the complicity of these individuals and entities in their illicit activities, thereby perpetuating a culture of impunity and shielding them from accountability. This desperate attempt to gag the media and suppress the truth is another evidence to the company’s desperation to maintain the veil of secrecy surrounding their nefarious operations and protect their cohorts from exposure. This audacious move is an affront to the principles of openness and accountability, and it is imperative that it be vehemently resisted to safeguard the integrity of free expression and the public’s right to know.

To effectively mitigate this crisis, the Nigerian government must adopt a resolute and proactive stance. The leadership of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) must be held accountable for their failure to safeguard the interests of Nigerian consumers. Furthermore, the government should undertake a comprehensive overhaul of the regulatory framework governing the importation and distribution of petroleum products to prevent future recurrences of this nature.

Moreover, a thorough investigation into Matrix Energy Limited , and their Cabal’s involvement in illicit activities, including the importation of sanctioned Russian oil, is imperative. If found culpable, the company should face severe penalties, including the revocation of its operating license. It is imperative that Matrix Energy ceases its egregious activities and is held accountable for its actions. The Nigerian people deserve a safe, reliable, and uninterrupted fuel supply, and it is the government’s responsibility to ensure that this is achieved.

The issue at hand extends beyond the mere importation of substandard fuel; it encompasses a complex web of illicit activities, including the importation of sanctioned products, falsification of documents to facilitate smooth operations, and the deliberate alteration of product origin. It is high time that Matrix Energy assumes responsibility for its actions and ceases its exploitative practices.

Nigerians deserve better and demand immediate action from the President to sanction the regulators responsible and address the leadership of the Oil and Gas sector in Nigeria. Matrix Energy’s exploitation of Nigeria’s fuel market and the manipulation of our Judiciary must be halted, and those responsible must be held accountable. The citizens of Nigeria will no longer tolerate being treated as guinea pigs for corporate greed and regulatory failure.

Tunde is an oil and gas expert writing from Dundee, United Kingdom.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Business

BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025

Published

on

BUA FOODS PLC RECORDS 101% PROFIT GROWTH IN H1 2025, CONSOLIDATES LEADERSHIP IN NIGERIA’S FOOD SECTOR …Revenue Rises to ₦912.5 Billion; PBT Hits ₦276.1 Billion

BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025

By femi Oyewale

BUA Foods Plc has delivered one of the most impressive financial performances in Nigeria’s fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector, recording a 91 per cent increase in Profit After Tax (PAT) for the 2025 financial year.
According to the company’s unaudited financial results for the year ended December 31, 2025, Profit After Tax rose sharply to ₦508 billion, compared with ₦266 billion recorded in 2024, underscoring strong operational efficiency, improved cost management, and resilience despite a challenging macroeconomic environment.
The near-doubling of profit reflects BUA Foods’ ability to navigate rising input costs, foreign exchange volatility, and inflationary pressures that weighed heavily on manufacturers throughout the year. Analysts note that the performance places the company among the strongest earnings growers on the Nigerian Exchange in 2025.
The company’s Q4 2025 performance further highlights this momentum. Group turnover stood at ₦383.4 billion, while gross profit came in at ₦151.5 billion, demonstrating sustained demand across its core product lines including sugar, flour, pasta, and rice.
Despite a year marked by higher operating costs across the industry, BUA Foods maintained disciplined spending. Administrative and selling expenses were kept under control relative to revenue, helping to protect margins.
Operating profit for Q4 2025 stood at ₦126.9 billion, reinforcing the company’s strong core earnings capacity. Although finance costs and foreign exchange losses remained a factor, reflecting the broader economic realities, BUA Foods still closed the period with a Net Profit Before Tax of ₦102.3 billion for the quarter.
Earnings Per Share Rise Sharply
Shareholders were among the biggest beneficiaries of the strong performance. Earnings Per Share (EPS) rose significantly, reflecting the substantial growth in net income and strengthening the company’s investment appeal.
Market watchers say the improved earnings profile could support sustained investor confidence, especially as the company continues to consolidate its leadership position in Nigeria’s food manufacturing space.
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025

By femi Oyewale
Industry Leadership Amid Economic Headwinds
BUA Foods’ 2025 results stand out against a backdrop of currency depreciation, energy cost spikes, and logistics challenges that constrained many manufacturers. The company’s scale, backward integration strategy, and local sourcing advantages are widely seen as key contributors to its resilience.
Outlook
With a 91% year-on-year growth in PAT, BUA Foods enters 2026 on a strong footing. Analysts expect the company to remain a major driver of growth in the consumer goods sector, provided macroeconomic stability improves and cost pressures ease.
For now, the 2025 numbers send a clear signal: BUA Foods is not only growing—it is accelerating.
Continue Reading

Business

Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards

Published

on

Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards

Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards

In celebration of the season of love, Adron Homes and Properties has announced the launch of its special Valentine campaign, “Love for Love” Promo, a customer-centric initiative designed to reward Nigerians who choose to express love through smart, lasting real estate investments.

The Love for Love Promo offers clients attractive discounts, flexible payment options, and an array of exclusive gift items, reinforcing Adron Homes’ commitment to making property ownership both rewarding and accessible. The campaign runs throughout the Valentine season and applies to the company’s wide portfolio of estates and housing projects strategically located across Nigeria.

 

Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards

Speaking on the promo, the company’s Managing Director, Mrs Adenike Ajobo, stated that the initiative is aimed at encouraging individuals and families to move beyond conventional Valentine gifts by investing in assets that secure their future. According to the company, love is best demonstrated through stability, legacy, and long-term value—principles that real estate ownership represents.

Under the promo structure, clients who make a payment of ₦100,000 receive cake, chocolates, and a bottle of wine, while those who pay ₦200,000 are rewarded with a Love Hamper. Payments of ₦500,000 attract a Love Hamper plus cake, and clients who pay ₦1,000,000 enjoy a choice of a Samsung phone or a Love Hamper with cake.

The rewards become increasingly premium as commitment grows. Clients who pay ₦5,000,000 receive either an iPad or an all-expenses-paid romantic getaway for a couple at one of Nigeria’s finest hotels, which includes two nights’ accommodation, special treats, and a Love Hamper. A payment of ₦10,000,000 comes with a choice of a Samsung Z Fold 7, three nights at a top-tier resort in Nigeria, or a full solar power installation.

For high-value investors, the Love for Love Promo delivers exceptional lifestyle experiences. Clients who pay ₦30,000,000 on land are rewarded with a three-night couple’s trip to Doha, Qatar, or South Africa, while purchasers of any Adron Homes house valued at ₦50,000,000 receive a double-door refrigerator.

The promo covers Adron Homes’ estates located in Lagos, Shimawa, Sagamu, Atan–Ota, Papalanto, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Osun, Ekiti, Abuja, Nasarawa, and Niger States, offering clients the opportunity to invest in fast-growing, strategically positioned communities nationwide.

Adron Homes reiterated that beyond the incentives, the campaign underscores the company’s strong reputation for secure land titles, affordable pricing, strategic locations, and a proven legacy in real estate development.

As Valentine’s Day approaches, Adron Homes encourages Nigerians at home and in the diaspora to take advantage of the Love for Love Promo to enjoy exceptional value, exclusive rewards, and the opportunity to build a future rooted in love, security, and prosperity.

Continue Reading

Business

Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital

Published

on

*Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital*

*BY BLAISE UDUNZE*

Despite the fragile 2024 economy grappling with inflation, currency volatility, and weak growth, Nigeria’s banking industry was widely portrayed as successful and strong amid triumphal headlines. The figures appeared to signal strength, resilience, and superior management as the Tier-1 banks such as Access Bank, Zenith Bank, GTBank, UBA, and First Bank of Nigeria, collectively reported profits approaching, and in some cases exceeding, N1 trillion. Surprisingly, a year later, these same banks touted as sound and solid are locked in a frenetic race to the capital markets, issuing rights offers and public placements back-to-back to meet the Central Bank of Nigeria’s N500 billion recapitalisation thresholds.

 

The contradiction is glaring. If Nigeria’s biggest banks are so profitable, why are they unable to internally fund their new capital requirements? Why have no fewer than 27 banks tapped the capital market in quick succession despite repeated assurances of balance-sheet robustness? And more fundamentally, what do these record profits actually say about the real health of the banking system?

 

The recapitalisation directive announced by the CBN in 2024 was ambitious by design. Banks with international licences were required to raise minimum capital to N500 billion by March 2026, while national and regional banks faced lower but still substantial thresholds ranging from N200 billion to N50 billion, respectively. Looking at the policy, it was sold as a modern reform meant to make banks stronger, more resilient in tough times, and better able to support major long-term economic development. In theory, strong banks should welcome such reforms. In practice, the scramble that followed has exposed uncomfortable truths about the structure of bank profitability in Nigeria.

 

At the heart of the inconsistency is a fundamental misunderstanding often encouraged by the banks themselves between profits and capital. Unknown to many, profitability, no matter how impressive, does not automatically translate into regulatory capital. Primarily, the CBN’s recapitalisation framework actually focuses on money paid in by shareholders when buying shares, fresh equity injected by investors over retained earnings or profits that exist mainly on paper.

 

This distinction matters because much of the profit surge recorded in 2024 and early 2025 was neither cash-generative nor sustainably repeatable. A significant portion of those headline banks’ profits reported actually came from foreign exchange revaluation gains following the sharp fall of the naira after exchange-rate unification. The industry witnessed that banks’ holding dollar-denominated assets their books showed bigger numbers as their balance sheets swell in naira terms, creating enormous paper profits without a corresponding improvement in underlying operational strength. These gains inflated income statements but did little to strengthen core capital, especially after the CBN barred banks from using FX revaluation gains for dividends or routine operations. In effect, banks looked richer without becoming stronger.

 

Beyond FX effects, Nigerian banks have increasingly relied on non-interest income fees, charges, and transaction levies to drive profitability. While this model is lucrative, it does not necessarily deepen financial intermediation or expand productive lending. High profits built on customer charges rather than loan growth offer limited support for long-term balance-sheet expansion. They also leave banks vulnerable when macroeconomic conditions shift, as is now happening.

Indeed, the recapitalisation exercise coincides with a turning point in the monetary cycle. The extraordinary conditions that supported bank earnings in 2024 and 2025 are beginning to unwind. Analysts now warn that Nigerian banks are approaching earnings reset, as net interest margins the backbone of traditional banking profitability, come under sustained pressure.

Renaissance Capital, in a January note, projects that major banks including Zenith, GTCO, Access Holdings, and UBA will struggle to deliver earnings growth in 2026 comparable to recent performance.

 

In a real sense, the CBN is expected to lower interest rates by 400 to 500 basis points because inflation is slowing down, and this means that banks will earn less on loans and government bonds, but they may not be able to quickly lower the interest they pay on deposits or other debts. The cash reserve requirements are still elevated, which does not earn interest; banks can’t easily increase or expand lending investments to make up for lower returns. The implications are significant. Net interest margin, the difference between what banks earn on loans and investments and what they pay on deposits, is poised to contract. Deposit competition is intensifying as lenders fight to shore up liquidity ahead of recapitalisation deadlines, pushing up funding costs. At the same time, yields on treasury bills and bonds, long a safe and lucrative haven for banks are expected to soften in a lower-rate environment. The result is a narrowing profit cushion just as banks are being asked to carry far larger equity bases.

 

Compounding this challenge is the fading of FX revaluation windfalls. With the naira relatively more stable in early 2026, the non-cash gains that once flattered bank earnings have largely evaporated. What remains is the less glamorous reality of core banking operations: credit risk management, cost efficiency, and genuine loan growth in a sluggish economy. In this new environment, maintaining headline profits will be far harder, even before accounting for the dilutive impact of recapitalisation.

 

That dilution is another underappreciated consequence of the capital rush. Massive share issuances mean that even if banks manage to sustain absolute profit levels, earnings per share and return on equity are likely to decline. Zenith, Access, UBA, and others are dramatically increasing their share counts. The same earnings pie is now being divided among many more shareholders, making individual returns leaner than during the pre-recapitalisation boom. For investors, the optics of strong profits may soon give way to the reality of weaker per-share performance.

Yet banks have pressed ahead, not only out of regulatory necessity but also strategic calculation.

 

During this period of recapitalization, investors are interested in the stock market with optimism, especially about bank shares, as banks are raising fresh capital, and this makes it easier to attract investments. This has become a season for the management teams to seize the moment to raise funds at relatively attractive valuations, strengthen ownership positions, and position themselves for post-recapitalisation dominance. In several cases, major shareholders and insiders have increased their stakes, as projected in the media, signalling confidence in long-term prospects even as near-term returns face pressure.

 

There is also a broader structural ambition at play. Well-capitalised banks can take on larger single obligor exposures, finance infrastructure projects, expand regionally, and compete more credibly with pan-African and global peers. From this perspective, recapitalisation is not merely about compliance but about reshaping the competitive hierarchy of Nigerian banking. What will be witnessed in the industry is that those who succeed will emerge larger, fewer, and more powerful. Those that fail will be forced into consolidation, retreat, or irrelevance.

 

For the wider economy, the outcome is ambiguous. Stronger banks with deeper capital buffers could improve systemic stability and enhance Nigeria’s ability to fund long-term development. The point is that while merging or consolidating banks may make them safer, it can also harm the market and the economy because it will reduce competition, let a few banks dominate, and encourage them to earn easy money from bonds and fees instead of funding real businesses. The truth be told, injecting more capital into the banks without complementary reforms in credit infrastructure, risk-sharing mechanisms, and fiscal discipline, isn’t enough as the aforementioned reforms are also needed.

 

The rush as exposed in this period, is that the moment Nigerian banks started raising new capital, the glaring reality behind their reported profits became clearer, that profits weren’t purely from good management, while the financial industry is not as sound and strong as its headline figures. The fact that trillion-naira profit banks must return repeatedly to shareholders for fresh capital is not a sign of excess strength, but of structural imbalance.

 

With the deadline for banks to raise new capital coming soon, by 31 March 2026, the focus has shifted from just raising N500 billion. N200 billion or N50 billion to think about the future shape and quality of Nigeria’s financial industry, or what it will actually look like afterward. Will recapitalisation mark a turning point toward deeper intermediation, lower dependence on speculative gains, and stronger support for economic growth? Or will it simply reset the numbers while leaving underlying incentives unchanged?

The answer will define the next chapter of Nigerian banking long after the capital market roadshows have ended and the profit headlines have faded.

 

 

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending