Connect with us

society

A Nation Held Hostage: The Shameful Politics of Calling Terrorists ‘Our Brothers

Published

on

When Nigeria’s Leaders Call Terrorists “Peacemakers”: The Dangerous Normalisation of Banditry

By FEMI OYEWALE

In a country bleeding from years of insurgency, mass abductions, jihadist expansion, and rural terror, one would expect political leaders to speak with clarity, courage, and conviction. But in today’s Nigeria, many officeholders have chosen a dangerous path: romanticising terrorists, legitimising bandits, and publicly describing armed killers as “our brothers,” “misunderstood youths,” or even “commanders of peace.”
This is not just reckless rhetoric — it is a national tragedy unfolding in real time.
FROM BANDITS TO ‘STAKEHOLDERS’: THE NEW POLITICAL LANGUAGE OF APPEASEMENT
Over the past five years, Nigerians have witnessed a disturbing linguistic and political shift. Terms that should be unequivocal — terrorists, jihadists, criminal gangs, bandit militias — are quietly being replaced with softer, sanitised labels in official statements.
Suddenly, men who burn villages, abduct schoolchildren, rape women, ambush soldiers, and extort helpless communities are being presented as:
Repentant fighters
Peace ambassadors
Community partners
Aggrieved citizens
Negotiators
Commanders of peace
This rebranding is not accidental. It is politically convenient, financially motivated, and rooted in a mixture of fear, corruption, and shortsighted calculations.
THE COST OF NORMALISING VIOLENCE
Security experts warn that elevating militants to the status of “partners” has three devastating consequences:
1. Terrorists Gain Political Legitimacy
Armed groups suddenly become power brokers — issuing conditions, attending negotiations, and influencing local governance.
Crimes against humanity evaporate with a handshake and a press conference.
2. Citizens Lose Trust in the State
Families who lost loved ones to bandits watch in disbelief as politicians pose for photos with the same men who destroyed their communities.
This deepens resentment, erodes confidence, and fractures national unity.
3. Violence Becomes Profitable
Once bandits realise that killing, kidnapping, and terrorising civilians earn them government attention — and in some cases, financial incentives — they escalate attacks to strengthen their bargaining position.
THE POLITICIANS WHO COURT BANDITS
From northern lawmakers openly advocating amnesty for bandits, to state governors hosting “peace talks” with armed killers in luxury hotels, the message is unmistakable:
Crime pays.
Violence pays more.
Terrorism pays best.
For some political actors, bandits serve useful purposes:
Useful for controlling restive communities
Useful for influencing elections
Useful as bargaining chips with federal authorities
Useful for sustaining patronage networks that flourish in chaos
And so, the cycle is sustained — deliberately or otherwise.
THE HYPOCRISY: NIGERIA PAMPERS TERRORISTS BUT PUNISHES PROTESTERS
The double standard is glaring.
While bandits are called “brothers”, young Nigerians protesting peacefully for police reform are branded “troublemakers,” “instigators,” or “security threats.”
While terrorists who kill soldiers receive cash, accommodation, and reintegration packages, unemployed graduates who join peaceful demonstrations face arrests, court charges, or brutal crackdowns.
This contradiction exposes the moral erosion at the heart of governance.
A NATION REBRANDING ITS OWN ENEMIES
Nigeria remains one of the few nations where:
Terrorists are defended by politicians
Bandits receive state escorts
Jihadists attend negotiation tables
Militants are prioritised over their victims
Leaders publicly introduce criminals as “partners in peace”
It is a bleak reflection of a nation losing its moral compass — and its ability to clearly distinguish right from wrong.
THE REAL TRUTH: THERE CAN BE NO PEACE WITHOUT JUSTICE
Experts agree: appeasement does not stop terrorism — it strengthens it.
Countries that successfully defeated insurgencies did not do so by massaging the egos of killers. They relied on:
Strong political will
Professional, intelligence-driven operations
Community-based security networks
Economic development initiatives
Zero tolerance for armed groups
Until Nigeria returns to these principles, the crisis will continue to deepen.
NIGERIA MUST STOP HONOURING THOSE WHO DESTROY IT
Every time a leader calls a bandit a “commander of peace,” Nigeria loses a piece of its soul.
Every time a terrorist is rewarded instead of prosecuted, the nation’s moral foundation collapses further.
The truth is simple — and painful:
No country has ever achieved peace by flattering its executioners.
Nigeria must choose:
Stand with its citizens, or stand with their tormentors.
The nation’s future depends on this choice.


A Nation Held Hostage: The Shameful Politics of Calling Terrorists ‘Our Brothers

society

Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso, Makinde, Ajadi, Others Converge in Ibadan for Historic Opposition Summit Ahead of 2027

Published

on

Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso, Makinde, Ajadi, Others Converge in Ibadan for Historic Opposition Summit Ahead of 2027

 

 

In a significant political convergence that could reshape Nigeria’s democratic landscape ahead of the 2027 general elections, prominent opposition leaders, including Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, and Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, gathered in Ibadan on Saturday for the National Summit of Opposition Political Parties Leaders.

 

The high-level summit, held at the Banquet Hall of the Government House Ibadan, also drew the participation of leading gubernatorial aspirant in Oyo State under the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Ambassador Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo, alongside several political heavyweights and stakeholders across party lines.

 

Convened under the theme, “That We May Work Together for a United Opposition to Sustain Our Democracy,” the summit brought together representatives from major opposition platforms including the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Labour Party, New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), African Democratic Congress (ADC), and the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP).

 

Other notable figures at the summit included former Senate President David Mark, former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, and former Sokoto State Governor Aminu Tambuwal.

 

Also in attendance were elder statesman Olagunsoye Oyinlola, former Niger State Governor Babangida Aliyu, political economist Pat Utomi, social activist Aisha Yesufu, and former APC National Secretary John Akpanudoedehe, among others.

 

Speakers and stakeholders at the summit examined critical national issues, including electoral reforms, national security, economic recovery, and the need for stronger democratic institutions, as part of efforts to forge a united opposition front ahead of 2027.

 

Ambassador Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo, who actively participated in the summit, spoke with journalists shortly after stepping out of the Banquet Hall. Addressing newsmen, Ajadi described the gathering as a turning point for opposition politics in Nigeria.

 

“This summit represents a new beginning for the opposition in Nigeria. What we are seeing is a deliberate effort to put aside differences and work towards a common goal,” Ajadi said.

 

He noted that the collaboration among diverse political actors signals a renewed commitment to national development and democratic consolidation.

 

Nigerians are looking for direction and credible leadership. The responsibility is on us as opposition leaders to provide that alternative and restore confidence in governance,” he added.

 

Analysts say the Ibadan summit marks one of the most coordinated efforts by opposition forces in recent years, signaling early realignments and possible coalition-building ahead of the next general elections.

 

As deliberations continue, political observers believe the outcomes of the summit could significantly influence Nigeria’s political direction, particularly if the unity advocated by participants translates into concrete alliances.

Continue Reading

society

Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026: Abuja and Lagos Set the Stage for a New Era of Local Innovation and Enterprise

Published

on

Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026: Abuja and Lagos Set the Stage for a New Era of Local Innovation and Enterprise

 

 

Abuja and Lagos are poised to surge with energy, enterprise, and cultural expression as the Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026 takes centre stage—an event designed not merely to display products, but to redefine perception.

 

More than a conventional exhibition, this gathering signals a confident assertion of Nigeria’s productive strength. Entrepreneurs, manufacturers, creatives, and industry leaders from across the nation will assemble to present a compelling spectrum of locally made goods. From premium leather craftsmanship and cutting-edge fashion to beauty innovations, agro-based solutions, and artisanal creations, each showcase reflects ingenuity shaped by resilience and ambition.

 

 

At the heart of the exhibition lies a deliberate push to elevate emerging brands. Many small businesses operate with limited visibility, often constrained by access and exposure. This platform disrupts that pattern. By offering opportunities such as complimentary booth spaces for selected participants, it opens the door for underrepresented talents to step into the spotlight—not just to sell, but to be seen, evaluated, and remembered.

 

According to Bola Awosika, the driving force behind the initiative, “This exhibition is about shifting mindsets. Nigerian products are not just alternatives—they are competitive, innovative, and globally relevant. We are creating a space where local brands can be experienced, trusted, and elevated.”

The exhibition will hold biannually in both Abuja and Lagos:

 

Abuja Edition

• First Edition: 27th–28th June 2026

• Second Edition: 12th–13th December 2026

Lagos Edition

• First Edition: 25th–26th July 2026

• Second Edition: 19th–20th December 2026

 

Each edition will draw a dynamic mix of participants—buyers scouting quality, investors searching for scalable ideas, media documenting emerging trends, and everyday Nigerians engaging with products that reflect their identity. Conversations sparked within the exhibition halls are expected to extend beyond introductions, evolving into partnerships and long-term collaborations.

The experience itself goes beyond static displays.

 

Attendees will encounter live demonstrations, immersive product storytelling, interactive sessions, and curated networking opportunities. It becomes less about walking through aisles and more about engaging directly with the pulse of Nigerian creativity and enterprise.

 

Yet, the exhibition carries a broader economic and cultural message. It challenges consumer habits, urging Nigerians to support domestic production while reinforcing confidence in local capabilities. Every transaction becomes a statement—one that contributes to national growth and industrial sustainability.

 

For many participants, this platform could mark a pivotal shift. A relatively unknown brand may secure national recognition. A hidden talent could attract strategic investment. An early-stage idea might evolve into a scalable enterprise. The ripple effects are designed to outlast the exhibition itself.

 

 

As the momentum builds business owners have started making enquiries and booking stands for each edition, what remains is not just a successful event, but a strengthened narrative—one that positions Nigerian products as credible, competitive, and ready for global markets.

 

 

Call to Participate: Affordable Access, Strategic Opportunity

 

As preparations intensify, the Convener, Bola Awosika, has extended a direct invitation to entrepreneurs, brands, and industry players to seize the opportunity presented by the exhibition.

 

“We have deliberately structured this exhibition to be inclusive and accessible. With pocket-friendly stand rates, we are removing the usual barriers that prevent many businesses from participating. Vendors can secure their booths at ₦150,000 and ₦200,000 respectively. This is not just a cost—it is an investment in visibility, credibility, and growth. We encourage businesses across Nigeria to take advantage of this platform to position their brands for new markets and opportunities,” she stated.

 

Beyond vendor participation, she emphasized the importance of collaboration in delivering a world-class event.

 

“it will be an annual event. We are also calling on corporate organisations, development institutions, and forward-thinking brands to come on board as sponsors and partners. This exhibition is a national platform with significant economic impact, and there is immense value for organisations looking to align with innovation, enterprise, and local content development.”

Interested exhibitors, sponsors, and partners can access more information and secure participation via the official website: www.nigeriaexportsexhibition.com.ng

 

The exhibition is currently supported by notable institutions including Bank of Industry, Lagos State Internal Revenue Service, and Sahcol, with additional sponsors and partners expected to join as momentum builds.

 

 

Powered by Bevents Logistics Synergy, the Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026 stands not as a fleeting showcase, but as a sustained movement—one that redefines how Nigeria sees its own potential and how the world engages with it.

 

Made-in-Nigeria Exhibition 2026: Abuja and Lagos Set the Stage for a New Era of Local Innovation and Enterprise

Continue Reading

society

Rebalancing The Force: Why Police Visibility Must Reach The Ordinary Citizen

Published

on

Rebalancing The Force: Why Police Visibility Must Reach The Ordinary Citizen

 

In every functioning society, the true test of policing is not what happens in elite corridors of influence, but what the ordinary citizen experiences on the street.

For too long, that balance has been distorted.

Recent criticism surrounding the redeployment of officers from Zone 2 Command in Lagos has been framed in sensational terms: mass transfers, alleged illegality, internal discontent. But beneath the noise lies a far more important and uncomfortable truth: Nigeria’s policing structure, particularly in high-interest zones, has been uneven, inefficient, and in urgent need of correction.

This is the context within which the actions of the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, must be understood.

The ongoing exercise is not incidental. It is the direct outcome of a clearly defined restructuring objective under the leadership of the Inspector-General: one that prioritises the even and adequate distribution of personnel for effective policing across the country.

Zone 2 Command, which oversees Lagos and Ogun States, has evolved over time into something beyond its administrative mandate. Rather than functioning strictly as a supervisory and coordination hub, it has become heavily populated, far beyond operational necessity.

In practical terms, this has meant one thing: a concentration of personnel where they are least needed, and a shortage where they are most needed.

While Zone 2 swelled with officers, reportedly far exceeding standard staffing expectations, divisional police stations, community posts, and rural commands have continued to operate below capacity.

The result?

* Slower response times
* Reduced police visibility in neighborhoods
* Overworked officers in understaffed stations
* Communities left feeling exposed

No serious policing system can justify that imbalance.

Security is not theoretical. It is not a concept measured in internal postings or administrative convenience. It is measured in presence: visible, responsive, and accessible.

When citizens say they do not “feel” the police, what they are really saying is simple: the system is not reaching them.

Redistributing personnel is not punishment. It is not arbitrary. It is the essence of operational policing.

This is precisely the thinking driving the current reforms under IGP Olatunji Disu—the deliberate repositioning of the Force to ensure that policing is not concentrated in a few administrative centres, but extended meaningfully to the communities that need it most.

The Inspector-General’s position is therefore not only defensible, it is necessary:
policing must be felt everywhere.

There is also an open secret that cannot be ignored.

Assignments to certain commands, particularly those linked to high-value civil disputes such as land matters, have historically attracted disproportionate interest. The concentration of officers in such zones is not always driven by operational need, but by perceived opportunity.

This distortion has long undermined equitable deployment.

Correcting it requires more than caution; it requires leadership and resolve, both of which are reflected in the current restructuring agenda of the Inspector-General.

Under the Nigeria Police Act, the Inspector-General of Police retains administrative authority over postings and redeployments within the Force.

Transfers are not extraordinary measures. They are routine instruments of:

* Discipline
* Efficiency
* Institutional balance

To label such actions as “illegal” without reference to any breached statute is to substitute sentiment for law.

More importantly, it distracts from the real issue:
Are officers deployed where Nigerians actually need them?

Nigeria is approaching a critical period.

With elections on the horizon, the demand for:

* Crowd control
* Community intelligence
* Rapid response capability

will increase significantly.

A police force clustered in administrative zones cannot meet that demand.

Lagos needs officers.
Ogun needs officers.
Communities need presence, not paperwork.

There is also a deeper dimension often ignored in public discourse; the welfare of officers themselves.

Overconcentration in some commands and understaffing in others creates:

* Burnout in frontline stations
* Irregular shifts
* Mental fatigue
* Reduced effectiveness

A properly distributed force, one of the core objectives of the current restructuring led by IGP Olatunji Disu allows for:

* Structured shifts
* Better rest cycles
* Improved mental health
* Higher operational efficiency

This is not just about deployment. It is about sustainability.

It is worth noting that previous leaderships have attempted to decongest Zone 2. Those efforts faltered, not because they were wrong, but because they lacked the consistency and institutional backing required to see them through.

Reform, by its nature, is disruptive.

But disruption is not dysfunction.
It is often the first step toward order.

The debate, therefore, should not be:

“Why are officers being transferred?”

The real question is:

Why were so many officers concentrated in one administrative zone while communities remained under-policed?

Until that question is answered honestly, resistance to reform will continue to masquerade as concern.

At its core, policing exists for one purpose: to protect the public.

Not selectively.
Not strategically for advantage.
But universally.

If restructuring ensures that:

* more officers are on the streets,
* more communities are covered, and
* more citizens feel safe,

then it is not just justified, it is imperative.

The common man does not measure policing by internal postings.
He measures it by presence.

And under the current reform-driven leadership, that presence is being deliberately, and necessarily, restored.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending