Business
Africa’s Moment at the G20: From Margin to Mainstage
Africa’s Moment at the G20: From Margin to Mainstage.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com
“How South Africa put the continent’s development at the centre of a historic summit and why the world cannot afford to look away.”
For decades Africa has been discussed at global gatherings as an addendum to other priorities, a footnote in communiqués, a sidebar at finance tables, a line-item in aid budgets. This week, under South Africa’s stewardship, that CALCULATING COMPLACENCY was CHALLENGED. For the first time in the Group of Twenty’s history, the G20 Leaders’ Summit convened on African soil (in Johannesburg on 22–23 November 2025) and with that simple fact the political geometry of global development shifted. The summit did not merely symbolically recognise Africa; South Africa used the platform to insist that Africa’s success is an indispensable engine of global stability, prosperity and sustainability.
This was not window dressing. Pretoria arrived with a clear, UNAPOLOGETIC PLAYBOOK: put debt, disaster resilience, green transition finance and inclusive growth at the top of the agenda; insist on concrete instruments that re-calibrate the global financial architecture in ways that favour developing countries; and compel the G20 to reckon publicly with the reality that a rising Africa is not charity; it is mutual interest. President Cyril Ramaphosa opened the Summit invoking Ubuntu (“I am because we are”) and framed Africa’s priority as existential to the G20’s mission of global stability and shared prosperity. That framing was not rhetorical flourish; it was an organising principle for a summit whose declaration and accompanying ministerial statements placed Africa-centred solutions at the centre of actionable commitments.
Why this matters is straightforward and urgent. Africa is home to the world’s youngest and fastest-growing workforce, vast arable land, and some of the largest untapped renewable-energy resources. Ignoring these assets is not merely unjust – it is self-defeating. The continent accounts for a disproportionate share of unmet infrastructure needs, climatically vulnerable populations and accelerating debt-service burdens that crowd out spending on health, education and industrialisation. Unless the international system changes how it finances development (and unless private capital is convincingly mobilised alongside smarter public instruments) Africa’s demographic dividend will risk becoming a global liability instead of an opportunity. The South African Presidency’s Africa Expert Panel and the accompanying reports handed to G20 leaders served as a precise roadmap for that transformation.
South Africa’s presidency pressed for PRAGMATIC TOOLS, not PLATITUDES. Among the priority asks were a G20-backed debt-refinancing or debt-resilience mechanism coordinated with the IMF and World Bank; a much larger, predictable pipeline for blended concessional finance to crowd in private investment; and strengthened disaster-risk financing and early-response capacity to protect vulnerable economies from climate shocks. These are not boutique recommendations. They are fundamental fixes to a system that has long treated Africa’s finance needs as episodic crises rather than predictable structural deficits. The G20 Finance Track and ministerial communiqués in 2025 explicitly addressed these themes — a tangible sign that the conversation has moved from moral exhortation to institutional design.
The summit also produced hard political theatre – proof that South Africa was willing to use the G20’s spotlight to TEST ENTRENCHED POWER DYNAMICS. The adoption of a leaders declaration on the opening day, and the content of that declaration, exposed genuine fault lines among the world’s leading economies on how far to go in rebalancing the rules of global finance and climate responsibility. The contestation underscored an uncomfortable truth: reordering global norms for fairness will be as much a political struggle as a technical exercise. Yet the mere fact that these issues were negotiated in Johannesburg (with African priorities front and centre) is a strategic victory.
Voices with gravitas reinforced South Africa’s case. António Guterres, the UN Secretary-General, commended the Summit’s theme and urged leaders to confront inequality and accelerate renewable-energy deployment in Africa; Akinwumi Adesina, president of the African Development Bank, has long argued that Africa can be pivotal for global growth if capital is redirected toward productive investment on the continent. Scholars and policy experts (from Masood Ahmed to leading think-tanks and the AfDB itself) have repeatedly warned that without predictable, affordable financing and better debt architecture, African countries face chronic underinvestment in human capital and infrastructure. Those warnings were woven into the Summit’s policy fabric, not left on the sidelines.
But rhetoric and report pages will not, on their own, produce change. The litmus test for Johannesburg’s legacy will be implementation: will the G20 convert words into new instruments that lower the cost of capital for African projects, underwrite early-warning systems for climate disasters, operationalise debt-refinancing facilities, and create measurable channels that crowd private investment into bankable African projects? South Africa has set the agenda; now the INSTITUTIONAL HEAVY LIFTING must follow. That requires transparent timelines, independent monitoring, and the political courage to deploy concessional resources in ways that catalyse (not substitute for) private investment. The Africa Expert Panel’s proposals provide that scaffolding; the G20 and its member institutions must now build.
There are inevitable skeptics. Some will say the G20 is a flawed vehicle for structural reform; that it privileges geopolitics over development, short-term optics over long-term system change. Yet this critique misses a simple fact: global governance institutions only change when coalitions force them to. South Africa’s leadership in bringing the G20 to the continent and insisting on an Africa-first policy prescription demonstrates how leadership, moral clarity and diplomatic skill can generate a political opening. The question now is whether other members will match rhetoric with resources and reforms. If they do not, the failure will be not of South Africa’s resolve but of global will.
For Africans, the Johannesburg summit should be a moment of tempered optimism – not complacency. The G20’s new focus on debt sustainability, green finance, and pipeline development offers a rare alignment between technical options and political opportunity. But Africa’s leaders must also match international action with domestic reform: better project preparation, stronger institutions, transparent procurement, and regional integration that creates scale for investment. When African governments pair disciplined governance with a reformed global system of finance, the continent’s transformation will accelerate. In short: the G20 can open the door – but Africa must walk through it with purpose.
This is South Africa’s historic gift to the continent and to the world: a blunt, unambiguous reminder that Africa’s fortunes are not peripheral. They are central to a just and prosperous global order. The Johannesburg summit has set a precedent – a test of whether the world’s most powerful economies will finally act in concert to make that centrality real. If the commitments made here are followed by concrete instruments, predictable finance and honest political follow-through, we will look back on this moment as the pivot from a world that talked about Africa to one that invested in Africa’s future. If not, history will record a missed opportunity of global consequence.
Africa’s success is not a REGIONAL FAVOUR; it is a GLOBAL IMPERATIVE. South Africa has, in Johannesburg, placed that imperative on the G20’s table. Now the hard work begins: to convert WORDS into CAPITAL, PLANS into PROJECTS, and PROMISES into MEASURABLE PROGRESS. The lives and livelihoods of millions depend on the answer.
Bank
Fidelity Bank grows gross earnings by 38% to N434.95b in Q1
Fidelity Bank grows gross earnings by 38% to N434.95b in Q1
Fidelity Bank Plc recorded 37.9 per cent growth in gross earnings to N434.95 billion in first quarter 2026 as the international commercial bank continued to expand its core banking market share.
Interim report and accounts of Fidelity Bank for the three months ended March 31, 2026 released at the Nigerian Exchange (NGX) showed that gross earnings rose from N315.42 billion in first quarter 20025 to N434.95 billion in first quarter 2026, representing an increase of 37.9 per cent.
The top-line performance was driven by impressive growth in the bank’s core business operations with interest incomes rising by 22.8 per cent to N314.48 billion in first quarter 2026 as against N256.10 billion in first quarter 2025.
With net interest income at N180.97 billion, the bank closed the period with profit before tax of N92.48 billion. After taxes, net profit stood at N74.47 billion for the three-month period. Earnings per share remained high at N5.69, underlining the capacity of the bank to reward its shareholders.
The balance sheet of the bank also emerged stronger. Total assets crossed the N11 trillion mark to N11.35 trillion by March 2026 compared with N10.46 trillion recorded in December 2025. Customers’ deposits increased from N6.89 trillion to N7.38 trillion. Total equity rode on the back of earnings growth to a 27.5 per cent increase from N1.09 trillion in December 2025 to N1.39 trillion by March 2026.
The first quarter 2026 results further consolidated the strong earnings outlook of the bank, which had successfully completed its recapitalisation amidst impressive earnings performance in 2025.
Fidelity Bank had recorded double-digit growths in interest and non-interest incomes as well as key balance sheet items during the year ended December 31, 2025.
The audited report showed that gross earnings rose from N1.04 trillion in 2024 to N1.52 trillion in 2025, an increase of 45.6 per cent. Interest and similar incomes had grown by 38.7 per cent from N803.1 billion in 2024 to N1.11 trillion in 2025. Fees and commission incomes also rose by 44.7 per cent from N78.4 billion to N113.4 billion. The bank recorded net profit after tax of N242.4 billion in 2025.
The bank’s balance sheet emerged stronger with total assets rising by 18.6 per cent to N10.46 trillion in 2025 as against N8.82 trillion in 2024. Customer deposits increased by 16.1 per cent from N5.94 trillion to N6.89 trillion, reflecting continued franchise strength and an improved funding profile. Net loans and advances meanwhile declined by 2.4 per cent to N4.28 trillion in 2025 as against N4.39 trillion in 2024, attributable to customers paying down on their mature obligations.
The bank had in 2025 strengthened its capital position, with eligible capital rising to N561 billion, above the regulatory minimum of N500 billion for banks with international authorisation. In addition, capital adequacy had remained robust, with Capital Adequacy Ratio of 30.94 per cent by December 2025 as against 23.47 per cent by December 2024.
Managing Director, Fidelity Bank Plc, Dr. Nneka Onyeali-Ikpe, said the first quarter 2026 results reinforced the bank’s strong and resilient business model.
She noted that with the remarkable success of its recapitalisation programme and continuing expansion, Fidelity Bank has entered a new era of growth and impressive returns.
“We are on a stronger footing and confident that we will set new growth records that are reflective of our legacy and the future we are working on,” Onyeali-Ikpe said.
Business
Dangote Refinery Ends Nigeria’s Era of Fuel Import Dependence, Boosts GDP, FX Earnings — EIU
Dangote Refinery Ends Nigeria’s Era of Fuel Import Dependence, Boosts GDP, FX Earnings — EIU
The operational ramp up of the 650,000 barrels per day Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals is fundamentally reshaping Nigeria’s downstream oil sector, significantly reducing the country’s dependence on imported refined petroleum products and strengthening its external position, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU).
In its latest assessment on Nigeria’s fuel market and regulatory environment, the EIU said the refinery has already transformed a sector that was previously characterised by heavy reliance on imported fuel despite Nigeria being Africa’s largest crude oil producer. The report noted that the refinery met nearly 80 per cent of domestic petrol demand in April and produced enough volumes to satisfy local consumption requirements as operations approached full capacity.
The EIU described Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector before the refinery as “long dysfunctional”, noting that the country had remained almost entirely dependent on costly imported fuel while producing nearly 1.5 million barrels of crude oil daily.
According to the report, the emergence of the refinery has reduced import dependence, improved domestic fuel availability and strengthened Nigeria’s balance of payments position through lower import demand and rising exports of refined petroleum products.
“The gradual ramp up of the 650,000 barrel/day Dangote refinery since May 2023 has transformed Nigeria’s long dysfunctional downstream sector,” the report stated. “The country’s main refineries, all state owned, had been inoperative for years and Nigeria was almost entirely reliant on costly imported fuel.”
The research and analysis division of The Economist Group, London added that the refinery’s attainment of full operational capacity and its planned expansion would further support Nigeria’s economic growth and foreign exchange earnings over the medium term.
“Meanwhile, the attainment of full capacity at, and an increase in exports from, the Dangote refinery will support real GDP growth and foreign exchange earnings in 2026 and 2027 and beyond, as a planned doubling of the plant’s output comes on stream around the end of the decade,” it added.
Industry analysts said the refinery is increasingly positioning Nigeria as an emerging refining and export hub, altering energy trade flows across Africa and reducing the vulnerability associated with fuel import dependence.
The EIU noted that the refinery’s expansion has coincided with major reforms in Nigeria’s downstream sector, including the removal of fuel subsidies and the introduction of market driven pricing mechanisms.
The report, however, said the transition from a state dominated fuel import structure to large scale domestic refining has triggered resistance from interests linked to the old import regime.
The latest tensions emerged following the decision by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority to relax restrictions on petrol imports despite the refinery’s growing capacity to meet domestic demand.
Dangote Industries subsequently initiated legal action, arguing that continued import approvals undermine domestic refining investments and conflict with the objectives of the Petroleum Industry Act, which seeks to encourage local refining capacity and reduce import dependence.
Analysts noted that the availability of large-scale domestic refining capacity has improved Nigeria’s energy security and reduced exposure to external supply shocks and foreign exchange volatility.
The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise also cautioned against unrestrained importation of petroleum products, warning that such a policy could weaken Nigeria’s industrialisation drive and discourage investments in domestic refining.
Chief Executive Officer of CPPE, Muda Yusuf, said continued dependence on imported fuel had historically contributed to pressure on foreign reserves, exchange rate instability and fiscal leakages.
The refinery’s growing impact is also being reflected in Nigeria’s broader macroeconomic indicators. Earlier this month, S&P Global Ratings cited increased domestic refining capacity and rising hydrocarbon exports among the major factors supporting Nigeria’s sovereign credit rating upgrade – the first in 14 years.
Beyond Nigeria, analysts said the refinery is increasingly being viewed as a strategic industrial asset for Africa, where many countries remain heavily dependent on imported fuel despite rising demand for transportation, manufacturing, and power generation.
Business
BREAKING: Court Dismisses $19.6 Million Claim Against NNPCL — Rules Contract Scope Cannot Be Changed Orally
BREAKING: Court Dismisses $19.6 Million Claim Against NNPCL — Rules Contract Scope Cannot Be Changed Orally
In a landmark ruling on Friday, May 22, 2026, the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja threw out a $19.6 million lawsuit filed by Alternate Dimensions Ventures Ltd against the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), affirming a key legal principle: a written contract cannot be expanded through oral agreements or conduct.
Alternate Dimensions had sought $19,600,000 in professional fees, claiming the scope of its Direct Sale, Direct Purchase (DSDP e-pro) contract with NNPCL was orally expanded. Represented by counsel Patrick Peter, the firm argued it was entitled to the revised sum for services rendered under the alleged new terms.
But NNPCL, through its lawyer Ituah Imhanze of KENNA LP, pushed back sharply, arguing that parties are bound exclusively by the clear terms of their written agreement. Imhanze contended that without any written amendment, the claim was legally unsound, and the court agreed.
Delivering judgment, Justice Hamza Mu’azu upheld NNPCL’s defense, stating that the contract was unambiguous and that no evidence was adduced during the trial, which supported the alleged scope expansion. The court further found that NNPCL fully complied with all contractual terms and committed no breach.
Dismissing the suit as meritless, Justice Mu’azu reinforced the doctrine of sanctity of contract: any amendment to a written agreement must be express, unequivocal, and documented, not implied or verbal.
The ruling spares NNPCL from the S19.6 million claim and also a floodgate of similar potential liabilities.
-
news6 months agoWHO REALLY OWNS MONIEPOINT? The $290 Million Deal That Sold Nigeria’s Top Fintech to Foreign Interests
-
society4 weeks agoSOCIAL MEDIA IS NOT A BATTLEFIELD COMMAND – WHY THE NIGERIAN ARMY’S ACTION AGAINST JUSTICE CRACK IS A NATIONAL SECURITY IMPERATIVE
-
celebrity radar - gossips4 months agoDr. Chris Okafor Returns with Power and Fire of the Spirit -Mounts Grace Nation Altar with Fresh Anointing and Restoration Grace on February 1, 2026
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoProphet Kingsley Aitafo Releases 2026 Prophecy: ‘Nigeria Will Rise, but the World Must Prepare for Turbulence’




