society
Bandits Roam Free While Citizens Face Trial: A Scathing Rebuke of Nigerian Governance and Judicial Hypocrisy
Bandits Roam Free While Citizens Face Trial: A Scathing Rebuke of Nigerian Governance and Judicial Hypocrisy.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | For SaharaWeeklyNG.com
“How the Persecution of Omoyele Sowore Exposes the Failure of the State to Protect Its People and Safeguard Freedoms.”
Nigeria today stands at a grim crossroads. On one path lies STATE REPRESSION where DISSIDENTS, JOURNALISTS and CRITICS are hauled before courts on dubious charges. On the other lies RAMPANT BANDITRY, ABDUCTIONS and VIOLENCE, terrorizing thousands of innocent citizens with apparent impunity. The recent pronouncements by the lawyer of human-rights activist Omoyele Sowore (that “bandits roam free while citizens face trial”) are not mere rhetoric. They are a sobering indictment of a government that seems more intent on silencing dissent than protecting lives.
This essay delves into the details of this accusation, unpacks the broader political and security context and argues forcefully why this moment demands not just outrage, but a national reckoning.
The Sowore Case: A Microcosm of State Misplaced Priorities. On 3 December 2025, Sowore’s lead counsel, Abubakar Marshal, delivered a blistering critique of the government’s latest prosecution of his client. According to Marshal, the government under Bola Ahmed Tinubu has embarked on a deliberate campaign to “shrink Nigeria’s civic space” by targeting ordinary citizens who demand accountability.
Marshal argued that while armed bandits (those who ABDUCT, KILL, RAPE, LOOT and DESTABILIZE WHOLE COMMUNITIES) roam freely, innocent Nigerians who only demand good governance are arrested, tried and harassed.
Consider the facts:
Sowore was arraigned on five-count charges by the Department of State Services (DSS), based on his social-media posts criticizing President Tinubu.
His lawyer challenged the competence of the suit and questioned the jurisdiction of the court.
Despite the protestations and even though the prosecution had only just received the defence’s objection, the court proceeded to grant bail on self-recognition.
The court noted that there was no evidence that Sowore posed a flight risk, that his passport had been deposited with the court registry and that he had attended previous hearings and yet he was still being prosecuted for exercising his right to expression.
Marshal’s conclusion was stark and unambiguous: a government that “NEGOTIATES WITH BANDITS AND PAYS RANSOM TO CRIMINALS” yet goes after citizens who only ask for accountability has perverted justice.
He called on Nigerians to “RISE and RESIST” such suppression, insisting that “until we are all free, we are not free.”
In short: the treatment of Sowore is not an isolated case, it is emblematic of a much deeper malaise, one that strikes at the heart of constitutional freedoms, the rule of law and state legitimacy.
The Reality of Banditry: Why the Complaint Is Not Hyperbole. To understand why the “BANDITS ROAM FREE” charge resonates (even beyond political circles) one must confront the stark truth about Nigeria’s security collapse. The state’s failure to stem banditry is well documented. A 2023 report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) laid bare how violent groups in the northwest and other regions carried out widespread killings, kidnappings for ransom, rape, looting, mass displacement and even in areas near the seat of government.
Academic research confirms what many analysts and victims already know: banditry in Nigeria has evolved into a form of modern slavery and one in which vulnerable populations are terrorized, traumatized, exploited and stripped of basic human dignity.
More than that, analysts have tied this security collapse to deeper failures of governance. A recent study published by the International Institute of Academic Research and Development shows how institutional breakdowns, weak law enforcement, chronic corruption, youth unemployment, poverty, neglect of rural infrastructure and social services have all combined to create fertile ground for bandits to thrive.
In the words of one security analyst recently quoted by a major African media outlet: Nigeria’s insecurity is “rooted in governance failure.”
Thus, when Sowore’s lawyer condemns the government for focusing on silencing critics instead of combating criminal terror, he is not exaggerating. He is calling attention to a tragic inversion of priorities: JUSTICE for DISSENTERS, IMPUNITY for KILLERS.
Governance Failure: The Bigger Crime. What we see today is not merely a spike in crime; it is the gradual unraveling of social contract and the implicit agreement between government and governed that promises safety, justice and dignity. Political scientists often define “good governance” as the ability of a government to uphold the rule of law, ensure transparency, deliver public goods (security, infrastructure, social services) and respect civil liberties.
When these pillars crumble, governance failure follows and the consequences are catastrophic. Banditry, insurgency, fear, social dislocation these become the norm rather than the exception.
Scholars studying Nigeria’s bandit crisis increasingly argue that military strikes alone cannot resolve the problem. These strategies (which often target hideouts deep in forests) do little to deal with root causes: poverty, despair, exclusion, neglect.
Without systemic reform (strengthening local governance, boosting rural development, creating economic opportunities, restoring trust between communities and security agencies) the cycle of violence and impunity will only deepen.
Moreover, when the same state that fails to protect its citizens turns around to suppress dissent, it forfeits moral and legal legitimacy. That is precisely what has happened in the Sowore case: a government that cannot guarantee safety still seeks to wield the courts like weapons.
The Cost — to Democracy, to Citizens, to Nigeria’s Soul. The suppression of dissent is not simply a violation of individual rights; it corrodes democracy itself. As veteran Nigerian human-rights lawyer and activist Richard Akinnola once argued, a free press, a robust civil society and respect for speech and assembly are not optional extras but they are indispensable to a functioning democracy.
When governments imprison critics instead of bandits, they send a chilling message to every journalist, activist or ordinary citizen: your voice is a liability.
The consequences are not hypothetical. They are real: in countless communities, people live in fear and are afraid to demand accountability, report abuses, or protest injustice. Meanwhile, bandits kill, rape, abduct, extort but with impunity. That is the opposite of security: it is a reign of terror.
In a broader moral sense, such selective justice erodes the very foundations of citizenship. A state that punishes the powerless and legitimizes the powerful becomes no longer a protector, but a predator.
What Must Be Done: A Call to Action. The moment demands more than outrage. It demands clarity of purpose and collective resolve.
Reprioritise Security — The government must shift focus: from criminalising dissent to dismantling criminal networks. It must strengthen local policing, intelligence gathering, community-based defence and socio-economic support for vulnerable regions. Scholars warn that banditry cannot be tackled only by guns; root causes must be addressed.
Protect Civic Space — The courts should not be used as tools of repression. The charges against dissenters like Sowore must be carefully reviewed; merit and constitutional rights must guide judicial actions, not political expedience.
Institutional Reform — Governance deficits (corruption, neglect of rural infrastructure, unequal development, lack of accountability) must be confronted. Good governance demands transparency, fairness, responsiveness and respect for human dignity.
Empower Communities — Local leaders, civil-society organisations, ordinary citizens must be involved in restoring security and governance. Community policing, rural development, and empowerment of youth are part of the solution — not just militarisation.
Defend Democracy — Citizens must rise to resist any attempt to silence dissent, even more so when the state fails to secure basic rights. As Sowore’s lawyer said: “until we are all free, we are not free.”
Final Take – No More Excuses, No More Silence.
The Nigerian state today faces two concurrent crises: the collapse of security, and the erosion of civil liberties. Though these crises are not separate; they are intimately linked. A state that forfeits its responsibility to protect its citizens while punishing those who call for accountability is a state that has lost its soul.
The words of Abubakar Marshal are not hyperbole, they are a sober diagnosis: “bandits roam free while citizens face trial.” The tragedy is not only in the violence inflicted by criminals, though that devastation is real, daily and heartbreaking. The greater tragedy is in the state’s betrayal of its core mandate: to secure lives, uphold justice and preserve freedom.
If Nigeria is to heal, rebuild and redeem itself, it must start by re-committing to the dignity of every citizen and by defending freedom, delivering security and honoring the rule of law. Anything less is not governance; it is TYRANNY hidden behind the ROBES of LEGITIMACY.
society
Stop Means Stop”: Legal Experts Warn Ignoring ‘Stop’ During Intimate Acts Can Be Criminally Punishable
“Stop Means Stop”: Legal Experts Warn Ignoring ‘Stop’ During Intimate Acts Can Be Criminally Punishable
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG
“Grounded in international law and consent principles, legal authorities stress that continuing sexual activity after a partner withdraws consent may constitute sexual assault and lead to imprisonment.”
A growing body of legal interpretation and expert opinion reaffirm that consent in intimate encounters is not a one-off event but an ongoing requirement; withdrawn at any time by either participant. Legal practitioners and rights advocates are increasingly warning that if one partner clearly says “stop” during sexual activity and the other continues, this conduct can constitute a criminal offence with significant penalties, including imprisonment.
Consent must be “a voluntary agreement to engage in the sexual activity in question,” and crucially can be revoked at any stage. Once a partner expresses withdrawal of consent (by words like “stop” or by unmistakable conduct) the other party is legally obligated to cease all activity immediately. Failure to respect this is widely recognised in multiple legal jurisdictions as sexual assault or rape.
Professor Deborah Rhode, a prominent authority on legal ethics, has stated: “Respect for autonomy and bodily integrity lies at the core of consent law. Ignoring a partner’s withdrawal of consent undermines basic personal freedoms and is treated as a serious offence in criminal law.”
According to experts, this legal principle is not limited to strangers but applies equally to long-term partners and spouses. The Criminal Code in many countries explicitly rejects implied or blanket consent based on relationship status.
Human rights lawyer Amal Clooney has similarly emphasised that clear communication and mutual agreement are essential, and that “once consent is withdrawn, any continued sexual activity crosses the line into criminal conduct.”
This means that in places where consent law is well-established, ignoring an explicit “stop” can lead to charges of sexual assault, with courts interpreting such conduct as a violation of an individual’s autonomy and dignity.
The issue has gained media and legal attention in recent years across numerous jurisdictions (including Canada, parts of Europe, and reform discussions in U.S. states) as courts and legislatures clarify that sexual consent is continuous and revocable at any time. Although no globally consolidated database exists of individual cases tied specifically to a news report on this warning, reputable legal frameworks consistently reinforce that continuing after “stop” is unlawful.
The subject engages legal scholars, criminal law practitioners, human rights experts, and statutory bodies advocating sexual violence prevention. Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors may pursue charges when clear evidence shows that consent was withdrawn and ignored.
In practice, consent frameworks require that the person initiating or continuing sexual activity take reasonable steps to ensure ongoing affirmation of willingness. Silence, passive behaviour, or failure to stop when asked cannot substitute for ongoing consent.
In summary, the legal maxim is clear: verbal or unambiguous withdrawal of consent must be respected. Ignoring it shifts the encounter from consensual to criminal, potentially resulting in serious legal consequences including imprisonment.
society
Lagos Family Property Dispute Turns Violent After Death of Omotayo Ojo
Lagos Family Property Dispute Turns Violent After Death of Chief Omotayo Ojo
By Ifeoma Ikem
A festering family dispute over property has escalated into a series of violent attacks in Lagos, leaving residents of a contested apartment in fear for their safety.
Mrs. Omotayo-Ojo-Alolagbe (Nee Omotayo-Ojo) the third child and first daughter of the late Omotayo Ojo, has alleged repeated assaults and destruction of property by her siblings from her father’s other marriages.
According to her account, hostility against her began while her father was still alive, allegedly fueled by the affection and support he showed her. She claimed that tensions worsened after his death in 2019.
Mrs. Alolagbe stated that her late father had given her a particular apartment during his lifetime, assuring her she would not suffer hardship, especially after her husband left the marriage. She said the property became her primary source of livelihood and shelter.
However, she alleged that her siblings had sold off several other family properties and were determined to dispossess her of the apartment allocated to her by their father.
The dispute reportedly turned violent on Nov. 15, 2025, when unknown persons allegedly attacked the building. She said the incident prompted her to petition the Chief Judge of Lagos State and the Commissioner of Police.
Despite the pending legal proceedings, she alleged that another attack occurred on Jan. 21, 2026. During that incident, parts of the building were vandalised, including the walkway and the main gate, which was reportedly removed.
A third attack was said to have taken place on Feb.18, 2026, during which the roof, gates, and sections of the walkway were allegedly dismantled. Residents were reportedly assaulted, and some were allegedly forced to part with money under duress.
Tenants in the apartment complex are said to be living in fear amid the repeated invasions, expressing concern over their safety and uncertainty about further violence.
Mrs. Alolagbe alleged that the attacks were led by a man identified as Mr. Alliu, popularly known as aka “Champion,” whom she described as a political thug. She claimed he arrived with a group of about 50 men, allegedly brandishing weapons and breaking bottles to intimidate residents.
She further alleged that the group boasted of connections with senior police officers, politicians in Lagos State, and even the presidency, claiming they were untouchable.
According to her, some arrests were initially made following the incidents, but the suspects were later released. She expressed concern that the alleged perpetrators continue to threaten her, making it difficult for her to move freely.
She also disclosed that during a meeting on Feb. 23, 2026, an Area Commander reportedly told her that little could be done because the matter was already before a court of law.
The development has raised concerns about the enforcement of law and order in civil disputes that degenerate into violence, particularly when court cases are pending.
As tensions persist, residents and observers are calling on relevant authorities to ensure the safety of lives and properties ,while allowing the courts to determine ownership and bring lasting resolution to the dispute.
society
Adron Homes Introduces Special Ramadan Offer with Discounts and Gift Rewards
Adron Homes Introduces Special Ramadan Offer with Discounts and Gift Rewards
As the holy month of Ramadan inspires reflection, sacrifice, and generosity, Adron Homes and Properties Limited has unveiled its special Ramadan Promo, encouraging families, investors, and aspiring homeowners to move beyond seasonal gestures and embrace property ownership as a lasting investment in their future.
The company stated that the Ramadan campaign, running from January 20th to April 6th, 2026, is designed to help Nigerians build long-term value and stability through accessible real estate opportunities. The initiative offers generous discounts, flexible payment structures, and meaningful Ramadan-themed gifts across its estates and housing projects nationwide.
Under the promo structure, clients enjoy a 30% discount on land purchases alongside a convenient 36-month flexible payment plan, making ownership more affordable and stress-free.
In the spirit of the season, the company has also attached thoughtful rewards to qualifying payments. Clients who pay ₦200,000 receive a Provision Hamper to support their household during the fasting period, while those who pay ₦400,000 receive an Automated Prayer Mat to enhance their spiritual experience throughout Ramadan.
According to the company, the Ramadan Promo reflects its commitment to aligning lifestyle, faith, and financial growth, enabling Nigerians at home and in the diaspora to secure appreciating assets while observing a season centered on discipline and forward planning.
Reiterating its dedication to secure land titles, prime locations, and affordable pricing, Adron Homes urged prospective buyers to take advantage of the limited-time Ramadan campaign to build a future grounded in stability, prosperity, and generational wealth.
This promo covers estates located in Lagos, Shimawa, Sagamu, Atan–Ota, Papalanto, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Osun, Ekiti, Abuja, Nasarawa, and Niger states.
As Ramadan calls for purposeful living and wise decisions, Adron Homes is redefining the season, transforming reflection into investment and faith into a lasting legacy.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society5 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
news7 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING





