Connect with us

Politics

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTONOMY: CDHR CHARGES STATES TO EXPEDITE CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS, SUES LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS ON GRASSROOTS DEVELOPMENT

Published

on

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DAY 2024: CDHR DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ACTION AGAINST INJUSTICES

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTONOMY: CDHR CHARGES STATES TO EXPEDITE CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS, SUES LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS ON GRASSROOTS DEVELOPMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 7 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, provides for democratically elected Local Government Councils. Section 162 of the Constitution is to the effect that funds in the Federation Account shall be distributable amongst and allocated to the Federal, States, and Local Governments. The 4th Schedule to the Constitution provides for the functions of local governments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drawing inspiration from these extant constitutional provisions and considering the apparent violations by State Governments, the Hon. Attorney General of the Federation filed a suit before the Supreme Court, invoking its original jurisdiction on behalf of the Local Governments. The Supreme Court held in favour of the Claimants.

 

The combined effects of the constitutional provisions and the decision of the Supreme Court lay and consolidate the foundation for functional and financial autonomy of local governments in Nigeria.

 

Following the Supreme Court decision, the Federal Government and State Governors agreed to a three-month moratorium to give full effect and enforcement on local government autonomy. This was due to issues concerning salary payments, operational viability, and modalities to work out frameworks on the apex court verdict. This new development means that Local Governments may wait till October before the implementation of the law in the direct payment into their respective accounts.

 

Recall that a few weeks ago, the apex court delivered a landmark judgment on 11th of July affirming the financial autonomy of the 774 Local governments in the country and ruled that governors could no longer control funds meant for the councils.The apex court also directed the Accountant-General of the Federation to pay Local Government allocations directly to their accounts, as it declared the non-remittance of funds by the 36 states unconstitutional.

 

In line with the above, the Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) has hailed the new development regarding the local government autonomy during its NEC meeting held on 17th August. The organisation reacted to this new development between the federal and the state governors, reaching a three-month moratorium to implement the supreme court verdict. The 90 days time line will give the state ample opportunity to put the necessary machineries in place for the smoth running of the third tier of the government in line with the verdict of the court.

 

CDHR commends the Attorney General of the Federation for taking the bold step towards the restructuring of the third tier of government. The organisation charges the 36 state governors and the FCT administration to use the golden opportunity to work out necessary frameworks that will aid smooth running of the local governments: set up electoral commissions, conduct credible elections and inaugurate the successful candidates accordingly ahead of the 90 days time line. The organisation warns against activities that may jeopardize the realisation of the intended outcomes.

 

CDHR also enjoined Local Government Councils to focus on grassroots development and to continually enhance the welfare and security of lives and property of citizens in the grassroots. CDHR sued the Council on the need for transparent administration, accountability, and good governance with the participation of the people.

 

CDHR further charges Local Governments on the need to focus on the economic, social, and cultural rights of the people. The Organization called on the Councils to direct their policies, programs, and resources on agricultural development, food security, rural development, primary healthcare, sanitation, education, economic empowerment, employment, and security.

 

E-Signed:

Comrade Debo Adeniran,

National President CDHR Nigeria.

 

Comrade Idris Afees Olayinka,

National Publicity Secretary CDHR Nigeria.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Politics

Lord of Rivers? Outrage as Sole Administrator Ibas Sacks 23 LG Bosses, Defies Court Summons

Published

on

Lord of Rivers? Outrage as Sole Administrator Ibas Sacks 23 LG Bosses, Defies Court Summons

Lord of Rivers? Outrage as Sole Administrator Ibas Sacks 23 LG Bosses, Defies Court Summons

In a stunning move that has rocked the political foundations of Rivers State, Sole Administrator Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.) is under fire for sacking all 23 local government caretakers and the Chairman of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC), barely 24 hours after a Federal High Court ordered him to appear and justify his intended actions.

Ibas, appointed to temporarily steer the state’s affairs following months of political crisis, drew fierce backlash on Wednesday when his administration announced sweeping changes in local governance and state institutions—moves widely described as unconstitutional and reeking of “executive recklessness.”

A Defiant Stroke of Power

Through a statement issued by Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Ibibia Worika, Ibas appointed new administrators across all 23 LGAs and replaced the RSIEC chairman, Justice Adolphus Enebeli (retd.), with Dr. Michael Odey, a relatively unknown figure. Odey will work with six commission members—four of whom are professors—raising eyebrows over the sudden academic-heavy restructuring.

“All appointments take effect from Monday, April 7, 2025,” the statement declared, ignoring the pending court proceedings in suit no. FHC/PH/CS/46/2025, where civic group PILEX Centre for Civic Education Initiative had sought a legal halt to Ibas’s actions.

Court Summons Ignored

Justice Adamu Muhammed of the Federal High Court had, just the day before, summoned Ibas to defend his decision before making any appointments. Yet the ink on the summons was barely dry when the state government released the controversial list of appointees.

Governor Sim Fubara’s Special Adviser on Electronic Media, Jerry Omatsogunwa, condemned the move, calling it “impunity taken to the pro-max level.”

“He’s acting like a lord unto himself. We cannot have that in a democracy,” Omatsogunwa said. “Even the National Assembly has dismissed the budget Ibas claimed he was preparing. That is not the mandate he was given.”

Systemic Overhaul or Power Overreach?

In a series of rapid-fire decisions, Ibas has also:

  • Suspended all heads of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs)

  • Cancelled all ongoing procurement and tender processes

  • Ordered refunds of all fees paid by contractors

  • Appointed new chairmen and members to both the civil and local government service commissions

While Ibas’s camp claims these moves are part of a constitutional cleanup, critics argue they are a flagrant abuse of interim powers and a slap in the face of due process.

Rivers on Edge

Civil society organizations, legal experts, and pro-democracy groups have all weighed in, warning that Ibas’s actions could deepen political instability in the oil-rich state.

“This is a constitutional crisis in motion,” said Courage Msirimovu, lead counsel for PILEX. “When a court summons is ignored, it’s not just a violation of law—it’s an insult to the entire justice system.”

The Bigger Picture

Vice Admiral Ibas was installed during an intense standoff between warring factions within the state’s political structure. But his recent actions have shifted the narrative—from a neutral mediator to what some now label “a rogue overlord.”

With the court case still pending and political tensions escalating, all eyes are on the judiciary—and the streets of Rivers may not remain calm for long.

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Nigeria Is Failing: The Absence of a True Activist President

Published

on

Why Nigeria Is Failing: The Absence of a True Activist President
By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Since gaining independence in 1960, Nigeria has struggled to fulfill the promises of democracy, good governance, and national development. Despite its wealth of human and natural resources, the country remains shackled by poverty, corruption, insecurity, and inequality. One central reason for this tragic underperformance is that Nigeria has never had a genuine natural activist as president—someone who embodies courage, truth, people-centeredness, and the dogged pursuit of justice.

Why Nigeria Is Failing: The Absence of a True Activist President
By George Omagbemi Sylvester

An activist president is not just a politician with populist rhetoric or a reformist with half-hearted policies. A true activist president is a leader whose political journey is rooted in service, whose conscience is unshaken by power, and whose commitment to the people’s welfare overrides personal ambition. Nigeria, unfortunately, has lacked such a figure at the helm.

The Political Class: Custodians of Self-interest

Most of Nigeria’s post-independence leaders emerged from military backgrounds or elite political families, often disconnected from the struggles of everyday Nigerians. Their primary loyalty lies not with the people but with entrenched interests—godfathers, ethnic power blocs, and foreign partners. As a result, Nigeria has been governed by men who lacked the moral fire and activist instinct necessary to radically confront injustice and reform oppressive structures.

 

Former president Muhammadu Buhari, for example, came to power in 2015 on a wave of anti-corruption promises, yet presided over one of the most nepotistic, economically disastrous, and divisive administrations in Nigerian history. Under his watch, Nigeria became the poverty capital of the world, inflation soared, and the naira collapsed. Yet, there was no sense of urgency or moral outrage from the presidency. That is not the mark of a natural activist—it is the signature of a career politician insulated from the people’s pain.

 

What Activist Leadership Looks Like
To understand what Nigeria has missed, we must look at examples of real activism. Take Gani Fawehinmi, the late human rights lawyer and one of Nigeria’s most respected moral voices. Gani stood firmly against military dictatorship, corruption, and human rights abuses. He spent time in jail, faced harassment, and lost personal comforts—all for the cause of justice.

In one of his famous quotes, he said:

“The legal profession is not for those who want to make money; it is for those who want to make a difference.”

Now imagine a Gani Fawehinmi-style figure as president. Would he tolerate the mass looting of public funds? Would he watch silently as universities are shut down, as youths migrate en masse, or as politicians manipulate the constitution for selfish gain? No. His presidency would be a fight for dignity, justice, and the poor.

Another case is Fela Anikulapo Kuti, the Afrobeat legend whose music was a fearless protest against oppression. Though never a politician, Fela had more influence than many presidents. He once said:

“My people are scared of the air around them, they always have an excuse not to fight for freedom.”

Fela’s message still resonates because Nigeria’s leaders govern with fear, not freedom. Fela might not have been president, but his activist mindset is what Nigeria sorely lacks in its highest office.

Activism Today: The Uncelebrated Warriors
Modern-day activists like Aisha Yesufu, a co-founder of the Bring Back Our Girls movement, have continued this tradition. Her iconic image standing in defiance during the #EndSARS protests became a symbol of resistance.

She once remarked:

“We can no longer outsource governance. We must take responsibility. If Nigeria is bad, it is because of Nigerians who allowed it.”

Likewise, Omoyele Sowore, founder of Sahara Reporters and convener of #RevolutionNow, has faced arrest, intimidation, and ridicule for daring to speak truth to power. Though often dismissed by the political elite, his activism exposes the structural rot that elections alone cannot fix.

Sowore once said:

“Real change does not come from people in power; it comes from people who challenge power.”

The Consequences of Activist Absence
The absence of a truly activist-minded president has created a dangerous vacuum—where leadership is reduced to ceremony, governance to contracts, and power to propaganda. Nigeria’s rulers manage crises; they don’t solve them. They placate foreign donors while ignoring the dying masses at home.

Under this docile leadership, corruption has become institutionalized. Security has deteriorated to the point where terrorists and bandits operate with impunity. The youth, the very future of the country, are fleeing in droves. According to the African Polling Institute, over 70% of Nigerian youths expressed a desire to leave the country permanently. This “Japa” syndrome is not just economic—it is psychological. It reflects a deep loss of faith in the leadership.

Why PDP’s Structure Offers Hope
While no political party is perfect, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) remains the most institutionally democratic structure in Nigeria’s political space. It has internal mechanisms for accountability, broader national appeal, and a history of relatively better economic performance during its years in power.

A committed activist emerging from or supported by such a structure would have a better chance of resisting autocratic tendencies, building coalitions across regions, and enacting pro-people policies. However, such a person must not be swallowed by party interests—they must reform the system from within, not become part of the rot.

What Nigeria Needs Now
Nigeria doesn’t need another technocrat who quotes GDP figures or an ex-general who can’t inspire trust. It doesn’t need recycled political heavyweights with no ideological clarity. What Nigeria desperately needs is an activist president—someone with the fire of Gani, the boldness of Fela, the resilience of Aisha, and the courage of Sowore.

This leader must emerge from the people, not be manufactured by elite consensus. They must be driven not by the perks of office, but by the pain of the people. They must be ready to lose power if it means saving the nation.

Until Nigeria experiences such leadership, the cycle of despair will continue. Elections will come and go, but nothing will change. The problems are too deep for cosmetic solutions. We need a president who is not afraid to call Nigeria’s problems by their real names and confront them head-on.

As Martin Luther King Jr. said:

“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

Nigeria’s leadership has been silent for too long. It is time for a voice—a bold, activist voice—to speak and lead us out of the darkness.

Continue Reading

Politics

APC Governors Visit Buhari Amid Defections, Pledge Unity and Loyalty to Party Patriarch

Published

on

APC Governors Visit Buhari Amid Defections, Pledge Unity and Loyalty to Party Patriarch

APC Governors Visit Buhari Amid Defections, Pledge Unity and Loyalty to Party Patriarch

In a high-profile show of solidarity, governors elected under the platform of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) on Monday paid a courtesy visit to former President Muhammadu Buhari at his residence in Daura, Kaduna State.

Led by the Governor of Imo State and Chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum, Hope Uzodimma, the APC governors held a closed-door meeting with Buhari, whom they described as the “father of the party.”

Speaking to journalists after the meeting, Uzodimma said the visit was meant to check on Buhari’s well-being and to express gratitude for his continued influence and guidance within the APC.

“We came to pay former President Muhammadu Buhari a courtesy visit,” Uzodimma said. “He is our father in politics and the only president the APC has produced since its formation. We are thankful to God that we met him in good health, and we had a very fruitful interaction.”

The visit comes against the backdrop of growing defections from the APC, including prominent Buhari allies such as former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai, who reportedly obtained Buhari’s blessing before defecting to the Social Democratic Party (SDP).

Mid-March also saw reports of former ministers in Buhari’s cabinet planning to move en masse to the SDP, while in Buhari’s home state of Katsina, several APC members have already crossed over.

Despite the cracks within the ruling party, Uzodimma insisted the visit symbolized unity and renewed strength within the APC, which currently boasts 21 sitting governors across the federation.

“APC remains the largest political party in Africa and we are proud of our achievements. President Buhari expressed satisfaction with the direction of the party and the leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” Uzodimma said.

Kaduna State Governor, Uba Sani, also lauded Buhari for his unwavering support for the APC and President Tinubu.

“We are happy with the way President Buhari continues to support our great party and President Tinubu. His blessings remain vital to the stability of the APC,” Sani noted.

The visit, attended by several APC governors, reportedly included discussions on internal party affairs, recent defections, and strategies to solidify the party’s base ahead of future elections.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending