Connect with us

Business

Corporate blackmail, my story as a case study, by Leo Stan Ekeh, Chairman Zinox Group”

Published

on

Corporate blackmail, my story as a case study, by Leo Stan Ekeh, Chairman Zinox Group”

In an end of year inspirational talk delivered on the 14th of December, 2024 to his select mentees of young entrepreneurs in Nigeria monitored in Lagos, Dr. Leo Stan Ekeh, advised them not to lose hope in the Nigerian economy, as he projects that the country shall start returning to a comfortable zone from the 3rd quarter of 2025, he also warned them to apply greater caution in transactions with persons and corporates of questionable character, stressing why due diligence and being local are both critical and an added advantage. Below are excerpts from the lecture.

The new fraud is Corporate and Personality blackmail which my companies and I have fallen victims of, and I am sure you read some in the newspapers where CEOs of responsible corporations in Nigeria are tagged fraudsters. This is the work of blackmailers, and they partner with a few blogs, engage some innocent respected law firms for hyping and a few government officials to achieve their set objectives to destroy your corporate and personal reputations. These negative online materials are then lifted by Google, Facebook, Instagram, and other social media platforms so that when people search your organisation or personal names, you are seen as a crook. This is with the intent to destroy your brand and affect your credit rating globally. In some cases, they sue you in multiple courts in Nigeria for the noise and to have the content to continue to upload on various social media platforms. Having set this platform against you, your competitors would leverage them to blackmail you by paying them handsomely. In some cases, they secure a Fiat from the office of the Attorney General of the Federation to give an impression that the Federal Government is suing you for fraud, which allegations they cannot prove in courts. This is to make more money from your competitors and extort you if you want such negative news taken down from social media pages.
I am a private person but for the first time in the history of my entrepreneurship I will let you people into a bit about the Group I founded over 38 years ago. In Nigeria, humility is seen as stupidity. You are free to reconcile and appreciate the noise a certain Benjamin Joseph and Femi Falana chambers are making as an insult to themselves and the nation.
My integrated technology group is the largest on the continent and it is for this reason that we have the second highest credit rating in the tech sector as far as I have been told in the whole of Africa. What this means is that, if you award us a contract of over $5billion, we don’t need to borrow to execute because we are trusted. In 38 years of tech entrepreneurship, we have done a global turnover of over $23.7billion and not borrowed a kobo from any financial institution in the world and we do not owe any. We have delivered the biggest tech projects across Africa and most of them you are aware of. I set out from day one as an orphan and an only child even though my parents were alive and I have five other siblings. So, I am my own adviser.

We built the group as corporate collateral, we are trusted by all our over 35 global partners and most of them are listed in Fortune 100. We do our best to promote a trust economy. Few weeks ago, I paid one of the leading multinationals over $31m for a debt one of the companies in the group incurred due to Naira devaluation challenges and this is one out of 31 multinationals.

So, I am like someone on steroids 24hours a day and manages to sleep 3hours a day to maintain this global reputation. As at last week, I inspected our companies’ books, the group exposure on credit extension to companies in Nigeria was over $89m. We have worked very hard to build knowledge, infrastructure and spiritual capacities for our survival and the group is not focused on money but our passion. Please research on all these before our final meet first quarter of 2025. I shall tell my full story one day.
Using what my companies TD Africa Distributions, Zinox Technologies, my colleagues in both companies, my wife, and I have suffered in the last 11 years in the hands of Benjamin Joseph of Citadel Oracle Concepts Ltd, an Enugu indigene based in Ibadan, and an alleged serial blackmailer and fraudster as a case study, you shall appreciate it.

I have never met Benjamin Joseph in my life and neither has he directly or indirectly enquired or transacted any business with Zinox Technologies Ltd in the history of our existence.
Citadel Oracle Concepts Ltd was amongst 13 companies awarded HP PC contract by Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS) in 2012, with instruction from the FIRS that the laptops must be sourced genuinely from HP Authorized Distributor in Nigeria, and TD Africa is the biggest HP Partner in Nigeria. This is because the FIRS wanted to guard against grey or fake products and the challenges of after-sales support. Citadel, through its authorised partner, Princess Kama (with a letter of Authority signed by Benjamin Joseph as the MD of Citadel Oracle Concepts Ltd) approached TD Africa to supply Citadel the laptops on credit as the company did not have enough funds to pay TD Africa. The agreed condition was that FIRS shall pay into a Citadel Account where two staff of TD shall be signatories to protect our pre-agreed invoice value plus additional guarantee from a responsible Nigerian. Citadel raised a Board resolution to include two TD staff, Chris Eze Ozims and Shade Oyebode, as the signatories in an account Citadel opened with Access Bank. TD Africa then supplied the systems to FIRS with serial number of each system captured. This was the same process for the other companies awarded similar contracts by the FIRS who didn’t have enough funds to pay for the laptops.

FIRS as a responsible FGN agency paid all on time and other companies immediately remitted pre-agreed amount from the dedicated account to TD Africa Account. But Benjamin Joseph the CEO of Citadel, as I was told by her partner, Princess Kama, wanted to divert the fund and possibly pay us at his own time or never. However, Princess Kama, because her Uncle Chief Igbokwe (a long-time partner of TD Africa) was an additional guarantor for the credit extended to Citadel, disagreed with the plans of Benjamin Joseph. She approached TD Africa signatories/representatives to debit the dedicated bank account the pre-agreed amount as Benjamin Joseph insisted on diverting the fund. TD representatives actioned immediately.

This is where the problem started.
One year after this transaction was closed and forgotten, we did not know both partners have been fighting over profit-sharing ratio. Benjamin Joseph engaged Afe Babalola chambers and claimed that his company was used to defraud FGN, that no laptops were supplied, and that he was not aware of both the contract and Citadel Account opened with Access Bank Plc.

According to Princess Kama, Chief Afe Babalola SAN, a distinguished lawyer of Afe Babalola Chambers, invited her to Ibadan and she obliged and when he raised the claims by Benjamin Joseph, she presented documentary evidence which was confirmed by FIRS management that Benjamin Joseph was aware of the contract and indeed submitted a copy of his International Passport, a Letter of Acceptance of the FIRS Contract and the appointment of Princess Kama as the duly authorised representative of Citadel on the FIRS contract. In fact, her position was vindicated by the FIRS in a letter dated 11th February 2014 and signed by FIRS Head of Legal, Idrissa Kogo, addressed to the same Afe Babalola and Co confirming that Mr. Benjamin Joseph was aware of the contract and even gave FIRS a letter dated 13th December, 20212 to deal with Princess Kama in relation to the contract. In the same letter, FIRS confirmed that Citadel instructed them to pay the proceed of the laptop into the Citadel Account with Access Bank. These matters would later be corroborated in the Witness Statement on Oath by Benjamin Joseph in a civil case he filed at the Lagos State High Court, accepting he was aware of the contract and gave those documents to Princess Kama. According to Princess Kama, Chief Afe Babalola advised her to increase Benjamin Joseph’s share by an additional N2m from the N10million she had initially offered. But Mr. Joseph insisted on taking all the profit from the transaction and she refused.

It was after one year that Benjamin Joseph started writing all sorts of petitions to different police stations and EFCC offices both in Lagos and Abuja and publishing interviews against me and Zinox with his hired media agents. I checked with Zinox and they never transacted any business with his company. When my staff started receiving invitations from the Police and EFCC, I had to independently investigate the transaction, and it was in order. I had no idea who both Benjamin Joseph and his partner Princess Kama were, and because a lady was involved, I had to investigate both and particularly Princess Kama to establish their partnership in case she was a member of a fraud syndicate and their true relationship. I hired foreign certified detectives who worked with local ones to establish their long-term relationship.
They once belonged in the same church, nearly got married, and been partners for years and even had previous contract bids which Princess Kama did for Citadel Oracle Concept Ltd in many offices including the Presidency. This cost me then $241,000. It was after I received a comprehensive report from the detectives that I asked my office to invite her to see me and she came and confirmed everything.

Mr. Joseph, who was properly investigated and documented including his financial status became more aggressive in publishing false claims, and probably expecting me to call him to negotiate as he was told I am a very rich man. At one point, an AIG of Police invited us to meet in his office at SFU Milverton, Ikoyi, to find a solution because he was shocked that someone was writing petition against my companies, my staff, and myself for less than N170m. But at the last minute, I apologised to the AIG, that I would not attend as Mr. Benjamin Joseph who came from Ibadan for the meeting was already blackmailing me in blogs and newspapers. He could use that meeting to a negative advantage.

Sometime in November 2013, the law firm of Afe Babalola, acting for Mr. Benjamin Joseph and his company, Citadel, wrote the first petition to the Special Fraud Unit (SFU) of the Nigerian Police at Milverton Ikoyi, that his signature was forged on the Board resolution and other documents. The SFU investigated his petitions and wrote a report that his claim of the forged signature by his partner Princess Kama and his claim that no computers were supplied to FIRS were false. He, again, petitioned the DIG of Police, then Dr. Solomon Arase, who finally became Inspector General of Police. Dr. Arase according to what I was told, sent his crack team to visit FIRS office and investigated other claims and found out that Mr. Benjamin Joseph lied absolutely.

Consequently, the IG of Police charged him to court in Charge No. CR/216/16 before Honourable Justice Peter Kekemeke of the FCT High Court, for false information. Even though the Prosecution proved and closed its case in 2018, Mr. Benjamin Joseph could not defend or substantiate his allegations after being required many times by the court to open his defence. He would change lawyers and absent himself from court giving medical reasons. Rather than opening his defence, Mr. Joseph was spending time in the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation begging for the AG to take over the case and discontinue the charges against him. However, the then Attorney General, after reviewing the case file on each of those three occasions, wrote to the Police to continue with his prosecution to a logical conclusion.

These directives were contained in three separate letters dated 10th February 2017, 7th May 2018, and 6th June 2022.
While the above case was on, Benjamin wrote the same lies to the then Vice President, Prof Yemi Osinbajo, claiming that his company was used to defraud the FGN and the VP rightly instructed the Chairman of EFCC to investigate and report back. The EFCC in their report stated that the allegation was false and absolved TD and its staff of any wrongdoing because they are entitled to payment for the laptops they supplied on credit and did not forge any documents; in fact, had no reasons to forge documents. However, the EFCC charged Princess Kama and her uncle, Chief Igbokwe to court before Honourable Justice Senchi of the FCT High Court, on the instigation of Mr. Benjamin Joseph. But, again, Mr. Benjamin Joseph, was unable to prove his allegations against them, and in a judgment delivered in February 2021, Honourable Justice Danlami Senchi in Charge No. FCT/HC/CR/244/2018, discharged and acquitted both Princess Kama and Chief Igbokwe, and imposed a damage of N20million against Mr. Benjamin Joseph for false petitioning and to serve as a deterrence against others who engage in false petitions that waste tax payers’ money.

More importantly, the judgment of Honourable Justice Senchi unequivocally stated that Technology Distributions and its staff were not liable for any fraud, that they were entitled to receive the proceeds of the laptops supplied on credit to Citadel Oracle Concept limited which were delivered to FIRS and confirmed by them. This judgment is still subsisting and Mr. Joseph has yet to pay the damage of N20million imposed on him. Before this point, Mr. Joseph and his media partners became desperate in blackmailing my wife, myself and Zinox Technologies in cheap blogs as no responsible media ever published any of their press releases except Sahara Reporters who was coopted and refuse to hear our side of the story.

All these years, none of my staff, companies or myself was invited or included in all these court processes except the EFCC court case where TD was only invited as a witness because Citadel transacted with them. But his media blackmail was on me and Zinox and he smartly avoided his partner Princess Kama. What Benjamin Joseph and his syndicate set up is a platform to work with my competitors who are willing to sponsor them to diminish my reputation by escalating in the media same case he could not defend and begged that it should be withdrawn. This is the cause of the Nigeria digital Census project delay till date and equipment worth over N300billion are wasting in warehouses because my competitors and their sponsors at the highest level used them and engaged Femi Falana SAN to secure a Fiat against my name, my wife, my companies to tag us as frauds. By their action, Zinox almost lost a digital census contract of over $250million of which it was the most qualified. However, then Attorney General of Federation, Mr. Malami SAN, when he found out that he was deceived by Femi Falana (SAN) in granting the Fiat, wrote him a letter dated 28th October 2022, withdrawing the Fiat and discontinuing the case against me and my company which they had filed, unknown to us. This is because Femi Falana SAN did not disclose fully to the Attorney General the fact that there is a subsisting judgment given by Honourable Justice Senchi that has dismissed all the allegations of Mr. Joseph and asked him to pay N20million damages. He also did not disclose the fact that his client, Mr. Joseph, was still facing a criminal trial brought by the IG of Police against him. So, a few days after, President Muhammadu Buhari, based on submissions at the Federal Executive Council meeting, approved that the contract be awarded to Zinox Technologies Ltd based on competence, capacity and experience. And it was awarded to Zinox Technologies after months of blackmail to eliminate us from the deal. We delivered the project on time per our terms of engagement, but it was too late for the previous administration to conduct the Digital Census. What it means is that these blackmailers with support of people like Femi Falana caused the lack of credible data to move the country forward as all the equipment procured for the census are lying waste in warehouses nationwide. That’s shameless Nigerians for you and they walk the street as free men till date.
The arrival of the new Attorney General, Lateef Fagbemi SAN, changed everything. As a lawyer who had worked with Afe Babalola chambers (former lawyers to Benjamin Joseph), one of his early actions in office was to discontinue the Police case (CR/216/16) against Benjamin Joseph following the petition lodged by the chambers of Afe Babalola SAN at the SFU, Milvertion Road, Ikoyi, Lagos, on behalf of Mr. Benjamin Jospeh, that was found to be false. As a distinguished lawyer that I respect, I expected him to request for source documents of the cases including one already decided against Joseph by Honourable Justice Senchi of the FCT High Court that had already found Mr. Benjamin Joseph of lying in his petition with a damage of N20million imposed on him. As the number one judicial officer of the nation, even if he wanted to save Mr. Joseph from going to jail, I expected the Honourable Attorney General to act dispassionately in the light of a subsisting case/order directed against him to refrain from discontinuing the Police Charge pending the determination of that case, and also in the light of the valid and subsisting judgment of Honourable Justice Senchi. Instead, he, against all the glaring SFU and EFFC reports and the decided case, withdrew the Police case against Mr. Joseph on reasons best known to him, thereby setting Mr. Joseph free, and he has been celebrating the withdrawal of a case he reported and could not prove/defend for years. To date, Benjamin Joseph acts as a blackmail platform for my competitors whenever we are competing on a bid, using nefarious publications in social media directed at me, my wife, and my company, Zinox.
Please, as stakeholders and future Nigerian trillionaires, learn from my experience but you must not dine with blackmailers as technologies shall soon delete them from the tech ecosystem.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Business

Is FirstBank Truly the First?

Published

on

Is FirstBank Truly the First in Banking Services? 

Is FirstBank Truly the First in Banking Services? 

 

For decades, First Bank of Nigeria (FBN), widely referred to as FirstBank, has prided itself on being a leader in the Nigerian banking sector. Established in 1894, the financial institution has positioned itself as a pillar of strength and reliability, serving millions of customers and businesses across the country and beyond. However, beneath the grandeur of its century-long legacy lies a series of alleged scandals, boardroom power struggles, and allegations that challenge its claim to excellence in banking services.

 

A Legacy Tainted by Controversy

 

While FirstBank has built a formidable reputation in the industry, recent years have seen the institution embroiled in controversies that have raised serious concerns about corporate governance, transparency, and ethical banking practices.

 

One of the most notable scandals in the bank’s recent history was the leadership tussle that rocked its board in 2021. The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) had to intervene after an alleged improper removal of the bank’s Managing Director, Adesola Adeduntan, by the Board of Directors. The regulatory authority deemed the move as a violation of corporate governance principles and reinstated Adeduntan, highlighting concerns of internal wranglings and executive interference within the institution.

 

The power struggle within FirstBank’s boardroom has long been a topic of public discussion in Nigeria’s financial circles. The institution has seen a revolving door of leadership changes, with accusations of alleged undue influence by powerful stakeholders, including billionaire businessman Femi Otedola and former board chairman Ibukun Awosika. Reports suggest that internal factions within the bank often engage in a battle of interests, placing political and personal agendas ahead of the bank’s strategic objectives.

 

Moreover, regulatory authorities have had to step in multiple times to stabilize the governance structure at FirstBank, raising concerns about the institution’s ability to independently manage its affairs.

 

Beyond governance struggles, FirstBank has not been immune to allegations of financial misconduct. In 2022, reports emerged regarding questionable loan approvals and potential insider dealings that put the bank at risk of financial instability. Some of these allegations pointed to loans granted without adequate collateral, benefiting influential figures with ties to the bank’s leadership.

 

Additionally, customers have raised complaints over the years about unethical banking practices, including unauthorized deductions, delayed transactions, and poor customer service. These issues, while common across the Nigerian banking sector, call into question whether FirstBank is truly living up to its legacy as the premier financial institution in the country.

 

Given the crisis engulfing FirstBank, the CBN has maintained a watchful eye over the institution. The apex bank’s intervention in leadership disputes and its mandate for compliance with regulatory frameworks indicate that FirstBank’s operations are not without significant oversight. While such interventions are meant to ensure stability, they also highlight the deep-seated issues within the bank that require continuous monitoring.

 

Despite these controversies, FirstBank remains a dominant force in the Nigerian banking landscape. Its extensive branch network, digital banking initiatives, and financial products continue to serve millions of customers. However, the multiple governance crises, allegations of financial impropriety, and regulatory interventions suggest that the bank’s claim to being the “first” in banking services is increasingly under scrutiny.

 

To maintain its esteemed reputation, FirstBank must prioritize corporate governance, transparency, and customer satisfaction. The banking industry is evolving, and with increased competition from both traditional banks and fintech disruptors, FirstBank must clean its house if it truly wants to remain the leader it claims to be.

 

The question remains: Is FirstBank still the first, or is it just another financial institution grappling with systemic issues? Only time will tell if the bank can rise above its scandals and reaffirm its leadership in the sector.

Continue Reading

Business

EXCLUSIVE:  Presidency Weighs Major Reforms in Broadcast Sector Amid Pay-TV Controversy

Published

on

EXCLUSIVE:  Presidency Weighs Major Reforms in Broadcast Sector Amid Pay-TV Controversy

EXCLUSIVE:  Presidency Weighs Major Reforms in Broadcast Sector Amid Pay-TV Controversy

Abuja – The National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) may be on the brink of a major regulatory shake-up as concerns over the pricing strategies, content access, and advertising monopolies of Nigeria’s dominant pay-TV operators come under intense scrutiny.

Though no formal directive has been issued, remarks made by NBC Director-General Charles Ebuebu during an informal exchange with journalists after attending an industry event in Lagos have set the industry on edge, fueling speculation that the regulator is finally moving to rein in exploitative market practices

The urgency of the situation has been further underscored by a formal petition from DAAR Communications, owners of Africa Independent Television (AIT), which accused major pay-TV platforms of stifling competition and using their market power to restrict access to free-to-air (FTA) content. But if that wasn’t enough to trigger alarm bells in government, what followed surely did—a sudden subscription price hike by one of the country’s biggest pay-TV operators, despite the naira gaining strength and inflation beginning to ease.

The timing of the price increase has sparked outrage, with consumer groups questioning why a company would raise costs at a time when the price of other goods and services is falling. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has since challenged the draconian pricing strategy, and in a rare public alignment, the NBC has now declared full support for the FCCPC’s intervention.

Behind the scenes, the presidency has now directed the establishment of high-level ad-hoc teams within the regulatory agency to conduct a short-term review of the sector, signaling that the federal government is not only watching but may be preparing to act decisively.

THE FTA CRISIS: PAY-TV OPERATORS BLOCKING ACCESS TO FREE CONTENT

One of the most contentious issues under review is how pay-TV companies have turned free-to-air (FTA) channels into part of their paid subscription models. While these channels are meant to be freely accessible to all Nigerians, pay-TV operators have long bundled them into premium packages, ensuring that subscribers must pay to access content that is supposed to be free.

This deliberate restriction of FTA access has allowed pay-TV operators to meet their regulatory obligations while suppressing independent broadcasters, effectively cornering the market and forcing consumers into unnecessary payments.

Industry sources suggest that NBC’s review could lead to an enforceable policy ensuring that FTA channels remain truly free, whether a viewer is subscribed to a pay-TV package or not. Such a measure would restore fair competition, allowing independent broadcasters to reach their full audience without interference from dominant platforms seeking to control distribution.

This potential shift is widely seen as a direct challenge to the business model of major pay-TV platforms, which have long relied on their ability to bundle FTA channels into their paid offerings, forcing viewers to subscribe even when they don’t need to. Should NBC move forward with such a policy, it would represent one of the most significant regulatory interventions in the Nigerian broadcast sector in years.

THE ADVERTISING MONOPOLY: TIME TO BREAK THE STRANGLEHOLD?

Beyond price hikes and content access, another key issue under scrutiny is the monopolization of advertising revenue in the pay-TV sector. Industry analysts have long pointed out that a few dominant platforms control a disproportionate share of the advertising market, leaving independent broadcasters struggling to secure funding.

NBC’s review is expected to consider measures to cap the percentage of advertising revenue that pay-TV operators can command. The goal is simple—redirect a greater share of the market to independent broadcasters who rely solely on ad revenue to survive.

Additionally, NBC is said to be considering expanding the digital access fee, currently applied to certain pay-TV services, to all platforms benefiting from the Nigerian media market, including digital streaming services. This would ensure that all players profiting from Nigerian audiences reinvest a fair share into local content production, jobs, and infrastructure development, aligning with the government’s broader economic plan to expand the creative sector into a N3 trillion industry by 2030.

The growing influence of digital streaming services like Netflix, Showmax, and Amazon Prime may also come under increasing regulatory focus. While these platforms have provided greater content diversity and access to global programming, there is concern that they have been allowed to profit from the Nigerian market without making sufficient reinvestments into local content production.

Sources indicate that NBC’s review may explore policies to collaborate with streaming platforms and reinvest a percentage of their Nigerian revenue into local productions. This would ensure that the country’s content creators benefit from the streaming boom rather than simply serving as consumers of foreign content.

NBC AND FCCPC: A UNITED FRONT AGAINST PRICE HIKES

The NBC’s decision to publicly align with the FCCPC on the issue of unjustified price increases signals a rare moment of regulatory unity. The fact that subscription costs are rising even as the naira strengthens and inflation drops raises serious questions about whether consumers are being taken advantage of by operators who are using their market control to set arbitrary prices.

Industry insiders suggest that the regulatory stance could set the stage for a wider investigation into pay-TV pricing structures, particularly how these companies justify their frequent price hikes despite economic conditions that suggest they should be lowering costs, not increasing them.

The possibility of sweeping regulatory intervention has split opinions in the industry.

Independent broadcasters and content creators see this as a long-overdue correction. For years, they have been locked out of fair competition, watching as pay-TV operators dominate advertising revenue, control content distribution, and force subscribers to pay for channels that should be free.

However, major pay-TV providers have been more cautious, with industry executives privately warning that increased regulation could “discourage investment” and “disrupt business models”.

One senior pay-TV official, speaking anonymously, expressed concern that the review process may introduce “unnecessary uncertainty” into the market. “There is a way to ensure fair competition without damaging the industry’s ability to attract investment,” he said.

THE PRESIDENCY’S NEXT MOVE: TO ACT OR TO WATCH?

While the presidency has not issued any direct public orders, its decision to mandate an immediate review of pay-TV and broadcast practices suggests that it is closely monitoring the situation.

The Tinubu administration has repeatedly emphasized the importance of creating a media and entertainment sector that works for all players, not just a select few. Sources suggest that the outcome of NBC’s review will be closely aligned with the government’s economic and creative sector goals—but how far the administration is willing to go remains to be seen.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

With high-level regulatory reviews underway, public backlash against rising subscription prices, and growing government interest in breaking monopolistic control, Nigeria’s pay-TV industry is at a crossroads.

If the NBC follows through on its review, Nigerians could soon see FTA channels that are truly free, advertising revenue that is more evenly distributed, and streaming platforms that reinvest in local content rather than extracting profits without giving back.

But if the dominant pay-TV operators successfully lobby their way out of meaningful reforms, business will continue as usual—with Nigerians paying higher subscription costs for channels that should be free, independent broadcasters struggling for survival, and corporate giants dictating the rules of the game.

One thing is certain—the era of unchecked dominance in Nigeria’s broadcast sector is being challenged like never before. Whether this results in real change or yet another quiet backroom settlement remains to be seen.

Continue Reading

Business

Uju Kennedy Ohanenye: conscientious public servant deserves commendation, not trial By Victory Oghene

Published

on

Uju Kennedy Ohanenye: conscientious public servant deserves commendation, not trial By Victory Oghene

Uju Kennedy Ohanenye: conscientious public servant deserves commendation, not trial

By Victory Oghene

The shark- infested and mine-lined Nigerian politics has often proved to be graveyards of men and women of conscience.
The examples are legion from professor Tam David West to Tai Solarin to Dr.Olu Onagoruwa. The trial and tribulation of the former Minister of Women Affairs , Uju Kennedy Ohanenye is the latest in the long line of public figures who have given an unblemished account of themselves but finding themselves being on trial, a classic case of irony.

Highlighting Ohaneye’s unprecedented pedigree is no longer news much of it is in public domain.

Sources at the ministry of women affairs told NATIONAL WAVES that “the sum of N350 million was approved for her for travels. She travelled with only two aides which is rare among ministers or high ranking public servants. In spite of that she only spent N21 million, returning the balance to Wale Edun, the minister of finance and sought for approval to enable her use it to empower women.”

It was gathered that the sum of
IN70million was earmarked for her by the office of the Vice President to travel to Bahamas, but in a manner so unlike some other high ranking government officials, she wrote to the Deputy Chief of Staff that her presence was not needed in that trip. Thirdly, she was said to have raised the sum of N550million through private donation for the empowerment of women shortly before she was relieved of her job. ‘She refunded the money to the donors when she was relieved of her job”, a ministry source familiar with the matter disclosed to this medium.

She was said to have also specifically returned N100million to Authur Eze. She also refunded donations from Tony Elumelu’s UBA and others.

Professor Adeagbo Moritiwon a political scientist told this medium that “her removal was not due to lack of performance or competence but more to do with politics prevailing over every other consideration. Her case is just like Ade Ojo.”

So why did the EFCC go after such a minister who has displayed exemplary conduct in office.
The mere fact that the former minister did not run away but honorably honoured the EFCC invitation testifies to no hidden agenda.

Operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission were said to have quizzed her over alleged links to the misappropriation, violation of procurement processes, and diversion of public funds amounting to ₦138million.

Another source at the ministry said ” invitation does not mean guilt. If the EFCC had cause to raise an issue, then there is no crime in that. Inviting her to clarify matters is a routine thing. At the end of the day those who know her can bet on it that she will come out unscathed.”

The funds in question were allegedly misappropriated during the disbursement of the 2023 budgeted allocation for the ministry.

While clarifying her visit to the anti-graft agency via her x handle,
Ohanenye said that she was invited and as a law abiding citizen, honoured the invite of the anti graft agency.

“As a former public servant, I acknowledge that inquiries regarding past official activities are a standard part of ensuring accountability. In this spirit, I willingly honored the invitation from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on March 6, 2025, concerning allegations of a 138 million Naira diversion.

“I arrived at the EFCC headquarters at 2:15 PM, and the substantive discussions commenced at 2:50 PM. During this time, I provided comprehensive clarifications regarding my actions and expenditures throughout my tenure as the Minister of Women Affairs.I rounded up by 6:50pm and left thereafter

“I commend the EFCC for their professionalism and hospitality, and I appreciate the opportunity to address the matters that have recently been circulating in the media.

“I extend my sincere gratitude to President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu for the privilege of serving my country and positively impacting the lives of many. I also express my appreciation to First Lady Senator Oluremi Tinubu for her steadfast support of myself and Nigerian women.

“I remain fully committed to cooperating with the EFCC and will be available for any further inquiries. It is the duty of every government official to be transparent and accountable for their time in office.

“During my tenure, my team and I executed our duties diligently, utilizing available resources effectively, and even supplementing with personal funds, demonstrating our dedication to the success of the Renewed Hope Agenda for Nigerian women and children.

“I assure that the facts and information will ultimately demonstrate the integrity of my actions”

While she held forte as Woman Affairs Minister, Ohanenye recorded a rare feat as regards her performance s

She explicitly understood that public service is for adding value to society.

Ohanenye profoundly had an in-depth perception of the purpose of government particularly Chapter II of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) which outlines the ‘Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy’ despite the fact the chapter as presently provided is not justiciable. Section 14 (2) supra provides thus; “It is hereby, accordingly, declared that; (b) the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government”.

It would be recalled that Ohanenye was among five ministers relieved of their duties following the 19th Federal Executive Council meeting held at the State House in October 2024.

In her place, President Bola Tinubu reappointed the former Minister of State for Police Affairs, Imaan Suleiman-Ibrahim, as the new Minister of Women Affairs.

Oghene a renowned Journalist writes from Lagos

Uju Kennedy Ohanenye: conscientious public servant deserves commendation, not trial
By Victory Oghene

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending