Connect with us

Business

Current Prices of Building Materials in Nigeria (September 2021) By Dennis Isong

Published

on

Current Prices of Building Materials in Nigeria (September 2021) By Dennis Isong

Building-There is a shortfall in the number of houses required to accommodate the teeming Nigerian Population even though the actual percentage figure needs a confirmation. However, the Federal Government through the Honorable Minister for Works and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola has at least admitted that there is a shortfall when he unveiled plans currently ongoing with the Federal Ministry of Finance to address housing shortfall concerns.

 

The Nigerian Government, in its public pronouncements, has put the task of driving the construction industry with the private sector particularly in the housing sector. Furthermore, the Federal Government has promised to support the industry with appropriate fiscal and monetary policies to drive down lending rates for all players in the industry. Materials

 

The footprints of private sector in the real estate has seen a rapid increase in Nigeria since 2007 with the approval of several mass housing schemes, subsequently a lot of Nigerians especially those in paid employments entitled to a mortgage facility are involved in one housing project or the other.

 

This article is to put together to provide insight to house owners or potential house owners on the current prices of building materials in Nigeria to aid in financial planning.

 

HIKE IN PRICE OF THE BUILDING MATERIALS IN NIGERIA

Due to the persistent depreciation of the Naira, the cost of building materials has experienced a drastic hike between prices 2020 and 2021 especially for imported products. Other reasons that have led to the increase in cost include:

  • Rising inflation
  • High interest rate
  • Inefficient distribution network of materials
  • Poor Road infrastructure  for haulage
  • Ban on importation of cement

 

 

The table below gives cost comparison of various building materials in  2021 for selected brands as at September 2021

Products Description September 2021
CEMENT    
Dangote 32.5 & 42.5 50kg(1 bag)

50kg(600 bags=1 trailer load)

3,800

2,250,000.00

Elephant Superset

 

50kg(1 bag)

50kg(600 bags=1 trailer load)

3,650,00

2,150,000,00

Elephant 50kg

50kg(600 bags=1 trailer load)-

3,700.00

2,200,000.00

Eagle 50kg(1 bag)

50kg(600 bags=1 trailer load)

3600.00

2,100,000.00

Bua 50kg(1 bag)

50kg(600 bags=1 trailer load)

3,650.00

2,150,000,00

Ibeto Regular 50kg(1 bag)

50kg(600 bags=1 trailer load)

3,600.00

2,100,000.00

Lafarge 50kg(1 bag)

50kg (600 bags =A trailer load)

3,450.00

2,070,000.00

Unicem 50kg.(1 bag)

50kg(600 bags =A trailer load)

3,800.00

2,300,000.00

GRANITE    
¾ inch, cargo 20 tonnes(1 trip)

 

125,000.00 –

143,000.00

½ inch, cargo 20 tonnes(1 trip)

 

122,00.00 –

145,000.00

¼ inch, cargo 20 tonnes(1 trip)

 

120,000.00 –

135,000.00

Granite

(Stone dust).

 

20 tonnes. (1 trip)

 

96,000.00

110,000.00

Product Description 2021( Cost=N=)
Gravel(1-¼ inch)

 

7 tonnes (1 trip)

 

45,000.00 –

60,000.00

BUILDING SAND    
 Sharp sand 20 tonnes(1 trip) 60,000.00- 70,000.00
Soft sharp sand 20 tonnes(1 trip) 90,000.00 -100,000.00
sharp sand Filling 20 tonnes (1 trip) 52,500.00 -60,000.00
Quarry Dust Filling 20 tonnes(1 trip) 130,000.00 –

140,000.00

LATERITE SOIL    
Highly clayish, red laterite soil. 10 tonnes(1 trip)

20 tonnes(1 trip)

14,000.00

22,000.00.

Highlyclayish, yellowish-brown laterite 10 tonnes(1 trip)

20 tonnes(1 trip)

12,000.00

20,000.00

Highly clayishdirty-white. 10 tonnes(1 trip)

20 tonnes(1 trip)

10,000.00.

20,000.00

Fairly clayish,red soil 10 tonnes(1 trip)

20 tonnes(1 trip)

10,000.00

18,000.00

Fairly clayish,yellowish-brown laterite 10 tonnes(1 trip)

20 tonnes(1 trip)

10,000.00

18,000.00

Fairly clayish,dirty-white laterite. 10 tonnes(1 trip)

20 tonnes(1 trip)

10,000.00

18,000.00

BLOCKS    
Blocks225mm-9”(hollow sandcrete) Vibrated.

hand  moulded

300.00

280.00

Blocks(hollow sandcrete, 150mm, 6-inches) Vibrated

hand  moulded

280.00

250.00

Blocks225-9”(laterite, choke bricks) Vibrated.

Hand  Moulded

 

120.00

100.00

Blocks150mm-6”(solid sandcret) Vibrated.

Hand  Moulded

320.00

290.00

NAILS    
1’5 1 Bag 8,500.00
2’ 1 Bag 6,750.00
2 1/2’ 1 Bag 6,200.00
3’ 1 Bag 6,000.00
4’ 1 Bag 6,700.00
Wall nails(2’) 1 Packet 1,050.00
Wall nails(3’) 1 Packet 1,000.00
Wall nails(4’) 1 Packet 1,100.00
STEEL RODS    
  Local Rod 12mm (93 pieces) 405,000
  Local Rod 10mm (133 pieces) 410,000
  Local Rod 8mm  (210 pieces)

 

440,000
  Local Rod 16mm  (52 pieces)

 

405,000
  TMT tested standard iron rods

12mm (93 pieces)

 

420,000
  TMT tested standard iron rods 16mm (52 pieces)

 

420,000
  TMT tested standard iron rods 10mm (133 pieces)

 

420,000
  TMT tested standard iron rods 8mm. ( 210 pieces)

 

 

450,000
  TMT tested standard iron rods 20mm

( 33 pieces)

 

420,000
  TMT tested standard iron rods 25mm (21 pieces)

 

420,000
BRC MESH

 

   
  20m of 4.0mm. 17,500.00
  25m of 4.0mm . 26,000.00
  20m of 3.5mm. 14.500.00
BINDING WIRE

 

   
  A roll of STIFF type 11,500.00
  A roll of FLEXIBLE type 10,00.00
ROOFING SHEETS    

Stone-coated roofing sheet

   
Shake design Shake design.(0.55mm thick) 3,250.00
Roman design Roman design. (0.55mm thick) 3,250.00
Classic design Classic design. (0.55mm thick) 3,050.00
Shingle design Shingle design. ( 0.55mm thick) 3,250,00

Fiber Britment roofing sheets

   
  Swiss roofing sheet 3,500.00

Aluminum sheets (for roofing)

   
METCOPPO sheet 0.55mm thickness

0.45mm thick

2,350.00

1,700.00

Long span sheet 0.55 mm thick

0.45mm thick

2,050.00

1,500.00

Step tile sheet 0.55 mm thick

0.45mm thick

2,300.00

1,600.00

WATER CLOSET SEATS    
A & S   55,000.00
Nismad   62,500.00
Sweet home   62,500.00
Twyford   61,500.00
Virony   75,000.00
PRICE LIST OF WINDOWS    
Windows (casement) 600*600mm Bronze-glazed 7,500.00
  600*600 mm Aluminum-covered 7,500.00
  600×750 mm bronze-glazed 4,250.00
Windows (sliding) 600×600 mm Bronze-glazed 7,250.00
  600×750 mm bronze-glazed 7,500.00
  600×600 mm Aluminum-covered 4,250,00
Windows Louvre 1500*1200mm window 8,000.00
  750*750mm window 1,800.00
  1800*1200mm window 10,000.00
Products Description Cost
DOORS    
Nigerian Doors Chinese door, single (imported) 15,000.00
  Double Door imported 35,000.00
  Turkey double security door (imported) 27,500.00
  Imported Security Double Door 55,000.00
  Low—density Flush plywood 5,500.00
  Flush plywood high-density 10,000.00
  Security Single door (metal) 22,500.00
  Security double door (meta) 30,000.00
  Domestic Furniture Doors 7,000.00
China Doors    
  Watson Times Chinese Door 75,000.00
  Watson Times Chinese Door (4 & 5 Feet) 67,500.00
  China Steel Doors 59,500.00
  China Security Door 125,000.00
Turkey Doors    
 

 

Turkey Hardwood Door 77,500.00
  Turkey Laminox Door 105,000.00
  Turkey Door-in Door 125,000.00
  Turkey Luxury Door 325,000.00
  Turkey Coco Castello Door 225,000.00
     
Security Doors    
Watson Time – Chinese Security Steel Door 3 feet 47,500.00
  4feet 47,500.00
Turkish Classic Security Door: 3 feet 120,000.00
  4feet 130,000.00
German Armord Security Door (Iron):

 

3 feet 160,000.00
  4 feet 200,000.00
Local Metal (Steel) Security Doors: 3 feet 27,500.00
  4 feet 34,500.00
Turkish Luxury Security Doors: 3 feet 260,000.00
  4 feet 280,500.00
German Copper Security Door: 3 feet   57,500.00
  4 feet      70,000.00
Products Description Cost (=N=)
Burglary Proof 1200*1200mm. burglar- proof (wrought iron) 9,500.00
  1500*1200mm burglar-proof (wrought iron) 11,000.00
  900*2100mm burglar-proof (wrought iron)              13,500.00
  750×750mm burglar-proof (wrought iron)                2,100.00
  900×1200mm burglar- proof (wrought iron)                5.750.00
Wood    
Hardwoods 3* 4               1,400.00
  2 * 2                525.00
  2 * 3                655.00
  2 * 4                900.00
  2 * 5                450.00
  2 * 6             1,725.00

Softwood

2 * 4* 12                 800.00
  2 *3 * 12                 525.00
  2*2                 500.00
  1*2*12             1,600.00
Ply woods    
Afara Plywood 1 sheet of ½-inch            3,250.00
  1 sheet of ¼-inch            2,150.00
  1 sheet of ¾-inch–            5,250.00
Obeche Plywood 1 sheet of ½-inch            3,000.00
  1 sheet of ¼-inc            1,725.00
  1 sheet of ¾-inch            4,250.00
Resin Coated Plywood 1 sheet of ½-inch            2,900.00
  1 sheet of ¾-inch            3,500.00
  1 sheet of ¼ -inch            2,650.00
Veneer Plywood 1 sheet of ½-inch            2,750.00
  1 full sheet of ¼-inch            2,850.00
  1 sheet of ¾-inch            3,750.00
  1 sheet of ¼-inch mg’s Plywood            1,800.00
  1 sheet of 3/4-inch Plywood (marine)  9,000.00
Floor Tiles    

Tiles (vitrified)

30*30 pack            1,250.00
  40*40 pack           1,350.00
  30×30 pack           1,525.00

Ceramic tiles price

30 × 30 pack           1,350.00
  40 x 40 pack           1,575.00
Unpolished Porcelain 40 x 40 pack           2,750.00
  30 x 60 pack           3,375.00
     

Conclusion

Having a prior knowledge of cost of building materials will help when interacting with engineers, architects, professional builders, artisans and suppliers. We do hope that you did find this article useful.

 

Dennis Isong Helps Individuals Invest Right In Real Estate.For Questions On This Article Or Enquiring About Real Estate Email: [email protected] or Whatsapp/Call +2348164741041

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Business

Group Signs Investment Promotion Agreement in Ivory Coast as UNIPGC Deploys Funding for Capital Projects  

Published

on

Group Signs Investment Promotion Agreement in Ivory Coast as UNIPGC Deploys Funding for Capital Projects

– Ivorycoast, Cot’devouir 

 

Noble & Gold Consulting Ltd has officially signed a partnership agreement with Gicobat Group of Company to facilitate funding for capital projects in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, through the UNIPGC–Global Economic Development Council (GEDC), during a high-level Business and Investment Roundtable held in the country.

 

The meeting, which took place on May 12, 2026, at the World Trade Centre in Abidjan, brought together senior executives and stakeholders from both organizations, including His Excellency, Amb. Jonathan Ojadah GCOP, Global President of UNIPGC; Mr. Noble Eze, CEO of Noble & Gold Consulting Ltd; and the Chairman of Gicobat Group of Company, Côte d’Ivoire.

 

The roundtable focused on opportunities for capital project financing, investment promotion, and business development across strategic sectors of the economy. Following extensive deliberations, the parties finalized terms and signed an agreement aimed at advancing the projects discussed during the engagement.

 

Speaking at the event, the Chairman of the UNIPGC-GEDC, His Excellency Amb. Jonathan Ojadah, delivered a presentation titled *“How Reputable Brands Can Secure Funding for Capital Projects.”* He stated that the agreement represents a major milestone in supporting high-profile business initiatives that require structured financing and professional project management.

 

According to him, the partnership aligns with UNIPGC-GEDC’s mandate as a leading investment promotion, advisory, and business development institution operating across Africa and internationally.

 

> “Today, I am delighted to address this important topic on how leaders of established and reputable brands can secure the capital required for major expansion, technological advancement, or infrastructure development. The objective is not merely to find funding, but to attract the right funding at the most competitive cost of capital,” he stated.

 

He emphasized that brand reputation remains a critical asset in attracting investors and financial institutions.

 

> “In business, reputation is everything. In the world of capital-intensive projects, reputation is more than public perception; it is an asset class. A reputable brand represents stability, proven performance, and trustworthiness,” he added.

 

Amb. Ojadah further noted that successful funding processes begin long before formal investment pitches are made. According to him, investors seek organizations that demonstrate value stewardship, operational excellence, and financial discipline.

 

Drawing from his international experience in capital project engagements across Egypt, Kenya, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, and other countries, he highlighted several categories of major funding institutions involved in large-scale development financing. These include multilateral development banks, government agencies, private foundations, and impact investors focused on infrastructure, healthcare, real estate, energy, oil and gas, and sustainable development.

 

Among the institutions he referenced were the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the European Union (EU), the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), the OPEC Fund for International Development, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Mastercard Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the UNIPGC Foundation.

 

He explained that through the UNIPGC Global Economic Development Council (GEDC), the organization facilitates funding opportunities for startups, private sector operators, and government projects through public-private partnerships (PPP), leveraging its network of international funding partners and financial institutions.

 

Amb. Ojadah identified three critical indicators commonly assessed by investors and lenders before financing projects:

 

1. **Transparency and Financial Performance** – Organizations must maintain audited financial records, quality assets, and sustainable growth patterns.

 

2. **Operational Excellence** – Investors prefer businesses with proven operational systems and stable cash flow generation, which reduce investment risks.

 

3. **A Strong Project Narrative** – Businesses must clearly demonstrate how proposed projects align with long-term strategic goals such as digital transformation, automation, infrastructure expansion, or increased market competitiveness.

 

He also outlined key strategies reputable brands can adopt in securing project financing, including bank financing, strategic partnerships, vendor financing arrangements, private equity investments, and asset-based lending structures.

 

> “Securing capital for projects as a reputable brand is ultimately about combining trust with strategic planning. Reputation is your strongest asset, and when paired with sound financial planning and a compelling vision, it becomes a powerful tool for building the future,” he concluded.

 

For Gicobat Group of Company, the partnership is expected to accelerate the execution of ongoing and proposed projects by leveraging UNIPGC-GEDC’s network of investors and financial partners. Officials of the company expressed confidence that the collaboration would significantly improve project implementation timelines and financing accessibility.

 

Organizers noted that the choice of the World Trade Centre, Abidjan, as the venue reflected the international scope and significance of the engagement, particularly for negotiations involving capital-intensive projects in infrastructure, trade, and industrial development.

 

UNIPGC-GEDC describes itself as a leading global investment promotion, advisory, and business development consultancy, working with governments, private enterprises, and institutional investors to structure, finance, and manage large-scale projects from inception to completion.

 

According to the organization, the Abidjan agreement adds to its expanding portfolio of strategic partnerships aimed at unlocking capital for projects with significant economic and social impact. It also confirmed that due diligence and project structuring processes had been completed prior to the signing to ensure project bankability and investor confidence.

 

Officials from both organizations further disclosed that implementation teams would be constituted immediately to oversee the next phase of the agreement. Although specific project details were not disclosed, both parties assured stakeholders that updates would be communicated as implementation milestones are achieved.

 

UNIPGC-GEDC also encouraged businesses, institutions, and investors with high-impact projects requiring financing or management support to engage with its team for collaboration opportunities. Further information on its services is available via UNIPGC-GEDC Official Website www.unipgc.org/gedc

Continue Reading

Business

Dennis Ekamah Isn’t Building Houses—He’s Redefining What Home Means for Africans Through PropTech

Published

on

Dennis Ekamah Isn’t Building Houses—He’s Redefining What Home Means for Africans Through PropTech.

 

The founder of coHouse.ng is reimagining how millions of Africans access, experience, and share housing through technology.

 

In Africa’s rapidly evolving innovation landscape, the most transformative companies are no longer defined by the industries they enter, but by the systems they redesign.

 

For Dennis Ekamah, the opportunity was never about constructing buildings, it was about confronting a deeper question.

 

why is access to housing still so structurally difficult for millions of Africans in a digital age?

 

Rather than stepping into real estate as a developer. Dennis chose a different path, positioning coHouse.ng as a PropTech platform rethinking how housing is accessed, experienced, and shared. At the heart of this vision which is connecting potential home owners together via resource pooling for the purpose of either Living or Growth. Simply, *Connect. Live. Grow.*

 

*A Platform Not a Property Company*

 

coHouse.ng is not a real estate company. It is a technology-driven ecosystem connecting like-minded individuals into structured communities where they can live intentionally, invest collectively, and grow within a shared system.

 

From Insight to Recognition

 

In 2025, coHouse.ng was recognised among the Top 50 Tech Startups in Africa. Even ahead of its official launch, the platform attracted over 1,000 early waitlist users, individuals eager to be part of a new way of living and investing.

 

Solving for Access, Alignment, and Trust

 

Dennis Ekamah’s diagnosis goes deeper than supply shortfalls. The real barriers he argues are access, coordination, and trust. coHouse.ng tackles all three through identity verification powered by a third party verification system api. coHouse is not flying solo without the help and collaboration with government bodies across Nigeria and other African countries.

 

In his words;

“Imagine what you would achieve as an individual or group if you’re living with the right people or like-minded individuals around you.”

 

I’m not a developer, I’m not a professional realtor, I’m just someone who sees the need for this solution based on the problem we face as youth/young entrepreneurs in today’s housing deficiency across Africa.

— Dennis Ekamah

 

Join our waitlist by visiting www.cohouse.ng

Continue Reading

Business

Landmark Judgment: Federal High Court Dismisses ₦50bn Oil Spill Claim Against ExxonMobil

Published

on

Landmark Judgment: Federal High Court Dismisses ₦50bn Oil Spill Claim Against ExxonMobil

 

The Federal High Court sitting in Uyo has dismissed a ₦50 billion lawsuit filed against ExxonMobil, sued as Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited, now Seplat Energy Producing, in a ruling analysts say could significantly reshape oil spill litigation and compensation claims in Nigeria’s petroleum sector.

Delivering judgment on April 29, 2026, Justice Onyetenu held that the suit instituted by the Ejige Ore Njenyisi Muma & Fishing Co-operative Society Ltd was incompetent and liable to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

The plaintiffs had sought ₦50 billion in damages over an alleged hydrocarbon spill said to have occurred on September 12, 2021.

However, counsel to the defendant, Chinonso Ekuma of KENNA LP, successfully argued that the claimants failed to disclose any legally recognisable violation attributable to the oil firm.

In its findings, the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any actionable wrongdoing against the defendant.

A key element in the court’s decision was the Joint Investigation Visit (JIV) Report tendered by the plaintiffs themselves, which showed that the alleged spill incident was confined within ExxonMobil’s operational facility and did not impact the members of the cooperative society or their sources of livelihood.

The court further ruled that claims arising from such incidents must be pursued strictly under the statutory compensation framework provided in Section 11(5) of the Oil Pipelines Act, rather than through common-law claims founded on negligence or nuisance.

Justice Onyetenu held that the plaintiffs’ attempt to circumvent the statutory regime by framing the suit as a tort action rendered the matter incompetent before the court, thereby depriving it of jurisdiction.

Legal analysts say the judgment reinforces the supremacy of the Oil Pipelines Act in determining compensation procedures relating to oil pipeline incidents and environmental claims in Nigeria.

The ruling is also seen as strengthening the evidential weight of Joint Investigation Visit Reports, particularly in cases where such reports indicate no direct impact on claimants or host communities.

Industry observers believe the judgment will have far-reaching implications for future oil spill litigation, especially regarding the procedural requirements for compensation claims against oil operators.

The court’s decision further provides clarity for operators within Nigeria’s energy sector by reaffirming that compliance with Section 11(5) of the Oil Pipelines Act is mandatory and cannot be sidestepped through alternative legal formulations.

While K.O. Uzuokwu appeared for the plaintiffs, the defence was led by Chinonso Ekuma of KENNA LP on behalf of ExxonMobil.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending