Connect with us

Business

Dangote, Monopoly Power, and Political Economy of Failure

Published

on

*Dangote, Monopoly Power, and Political Economy of Failure*

BY BLAISE UDUNZE

 

 

Nigeria’s refining crisis is one of the country’s most enduring economic contradictions. Africa’s largest crude oil producer, strategically located on the Atlantic coast and home to over 200 million people, has for decades depended on imported refined petroleum products. This illogicality has drained foreign exchange, weakened the naira, distorted investment incentives, and hollowed out state institutions. Instead of catalysing industrialisation, Nigeria’s oil wealth became a mechanism for capital flight, rent-seeking, and institutional decay.

 

 

With the challenges surrounding the refining of crude oil, the establishment of Dangote Refinery signifies an important historic moment. The refinery promises to reduce fuel imports to a bare minimum, sustain foreign exchange growth, ensure there is constant fuel domestically, and strategically position Nigeria as a regional exporter of refined oil products if functioned at full capacity. Dangote Refinery symbolises what private capital, technology, and ambition can achieve in Africa following years of fuel queues, subsidy scandals, and global embarrassment.

 

 

Nigerians must have a rethink in the cause of celebration. Nigeria’s refining problem is not simply about capacity; it is about systems. Without addressing the policy failures and institutional weaknesses that made Dangote an exception rather than the rule, the country risks replacing one failure with another, this time cloaked in private-sector success.

 

 

For a fact, Nigeria desperately needs the emergence of Dangote refinery, and its success is in the national interest. Hence, this is not an argument against the Dangote Refinery. But history warns that structural failures are not solved by scale alone. Over the year, situations have shown that without competition and strong institutions, concentrated market power, whether public or private, can undermine price stability, energy security, and consumer welfare.

 

 

 

The Long Silence of Refinery Investments

 

Perhaps the most troubling question in Nigeria’s oil history is why none of the global oil majors like Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Total, or Agip has built a major refinery in Nigeria for over four decades. These companies operated profitably in Nigeria, extracted their crude, and sold refined products back to the country, yet never committed capital to domestic refining.

 

Over the period, it has been shown that policy incoherence has been the cause, not a matter of technical incapacity, such as price controls, resistant licensing processes, subsidy arrears, frequent regulatory changes, and political interference, which made refining an unattractive investment. Importation, by contrast, offered quick returns, lower political risk, and guaranteed margins, often backed by government subsidies.

 

 

Nigeria carelessly designed a system that rather rewarded importers and punished refiners. Dangote did not succeed because the system improved; he succeeded despite it. His refinery exists largely because of the concessions from the government, exceptional financial capacity, political access, and a willingness to absorb risks that institutions should ordinarily mitigate. This raises a deeper concern; when institutions fail, progress becomes dependent on extraordinary individuals rather than predictable systems.

 

 

The Tragedy of NNPC Refineries

 

If private investors stayed away, Nigeria’s state-owned refineries should have filled the gap. Instead, the Port Harcourt, Warri, and Kaduna refineries became monuments to mismanagement. Records have shown that between 2010 and 2025, Nigeria reportedly wasted between $18 billion and $25 billion, over N11 trillion, just for Turn Around Maintenance and rehabilitation. Kaduna Refinery alone is estimated to have consumed over N2.2 trillion in a decade.

 

Despite these expenditures, output remained negligible. This was not merely a technical failure but a governance one. Contracts were poorly monitored, accountability was absent, and consequences were nonexistent. In functional systems, such outcomes trigger investigations, sanctions, and reforms. In Nigeria, the cycle simply repeated itself, eroding public trust and deepening dependence on imports.

 

 

 

Where Is BUA?

 

Dangote is not the only Nigerian conglomerate to announce refinery ambitions. In 2020, BUA Group unveiled plans for a 200,000-barrels-per-day refinery. Years later, progress remains unclear, timelines have shifted, and execution appears stalled.

 

This pattern is revealing. When multiple large investors struggle to translate plans into reality, the issue is not ambition but environment. Refinery projects in Nigeria appear viable only at a massive scale and with extraordinary political leverage. Smaller or mid-sized players are effectively crowded out, not by market forces, but by systemic dysfunction.

 

 

 

Policy Failure and the Singapore Comparison

 

Nigeria often aspires to emulate Singapore’s refining and petrochemical success. The comparison is instructive. Singapore has no crude oil, yet built one of the world’s most sophisticated refining hubs through consistent policy, investor protection, infrastructure planning, and regulatory certainty.

 

 

Nigeria chose a different path: price controls, subsidies, weak contract enforcement, and politically motivated policy reversals. Refineries became tools of patronage rather than productivity. Capital exited, infrastructure decayed, and import dependence deepened. The outcome was predictable.

 

 

 

The Cost of Import Dependence

 

For years, Nigeria spent billions of dollars annually importing petrol, diesel, and aviation fuel. This placed constant pressure on foreign reserves and the naira. Petrol subsidies alone were estimated at N4-N6 trillion per year, often exceeding national spending on health, education, or infrastructure.

 

 

Even after subsidy removal, legacy costs remain: distorted consumption patterns, weakened public finances, and entrenched interests built around importation. These interests did not disappear quietly.

 

 

 

Who Really Benefited from the Subsidy?

 

Although framed as pro-poor, fuel subsidies disproportionately benefited importers, traders, shipping firms, depot owners, financiers, and politically connected intermediaries. Smuggling across borders meant Nigerians subsidised fuel consumption in neighbouring countries.

 

Ordinary citizens received marginal relief at the pump but paid far more through inflation, deteriorating infrastructure, and underfunded public services. The subsidy system functioned less as social protection and more as elite redistribution.

 

 

 

The Traders’ Dilemma

 

Why did major fuel marketers like Oando invest in refineries abroad but not in Nigeria? Again, incentives explain behaviour. Importation offered faster returns, lower capital requirements, and political insulation. Domestic refining demanded long-term investment under unstable rules.

 

In an irrational system, rational actors optimise accordingly. Importation thrived not because it was efficient, but because policy made it so.

 

 

 

FDI and the Confidence Problem

 

Sustainable Foreign Direct Investment follows domestic confidence. When local investors, who best understand political and regulatory risks, avoid long-term industrial projects, foreign investors take note. Capital flows to environments with predictable pricing, rule of law, and policy consistency.

 

Nigeria’s challenge is not attracting speculative capital, but building conditions for patient, productive investment.

 

 

 

Dangote and the Monopoly Question

 

Dangote Refinery deserves credit. But scale brings power, and power demands oversight. If importers exit and no competing refineries emerge, Dangote could dominate refining, pricing, and supply. Nigeria’s experience with cement, where domestic production rose but prices soared due to limited competition, offers a cautionary tale.

 

Markets function best with competition. Without it, price manipulation, supply risks, and weakened energy security become real dangers, especially in countries with fragile regulatory institutions.

 

 

 

The Way Forward: Competition, Not Replacement

 

Nigeria does not need to weaken Dangote; it needs to multiply Dangotes. The goal should be a competitive refining ecosystem, not a replacement of a public monopoly with a private monopoly.

 

 

This requires transparent crude allocation, open access to pipelines and storage, fair pricing mechanisms, and strong antitrust enforcement. State refineries must either be professionally concessional or decisively restructured. Stalled projects like BUA’s should be unblocked, and modular refineries should be supported.

 

 

The Litmus Test

Nigeria’s refining crisis was decades in the making and cannot be solved by one refinery, however large. Dangote Refinery is a turning point, but only if embedded within systemic reform. Otherwise, Nigeria risks trading one form of dependency for another.

 

The true test is not whether Nigeria can refine fuel, but whether it can build fair, open, and resilient institutions that serve the public interest. In refining, as in democracy, excessive concentration of power is dangerous. Competition remains the strongest safeguard.

 

 

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]

Business

Imports Are Not the Enemy: Why Nigeria’s Downstream Stability Depends on Regulation, Not Sentiment

Published

on

Imports Are Not the Enemy: Why Nigeria’s Downstream Stability Depends on Regulation, Not Sentiment

 Imports Are Not the Enemy: Why Nigeria’s Downstream Stability Depends on Regulation, Not Sentiment

It is important to state clearly that the pricing stability being observed in Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector today is not accidental. It is largely the product of active, disciplined regulation by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA).

Without regulation, stability would be illusory.

Imports Are Not the Enemy: Why Nigeria’s Downstream Stability Depends on Regulation, Not Sentiment

Imagine a downstream system entirely dependent on a single domestic supplier in the name of local refining, with no balancing mechanism and no competitive pressure. In such a scenario, prices would not be discovered by the market; they would be dictated. Any upward adjustment by that supplier would transmit instantly to consumers, with no buffer and no alternative source of supply. That is not energy security. It is vulnerability.

Yet this is the central issue often ignored in the current debate.

Do Nigerian refineries deserve protection? Yes.
Does Nigeria deserve insulation from domestic supply shocks? Absolutely.
Is regulation essential in a strategic industry like downstream oil and gas? Without question.

But policy must confront facts, not sentiment.

Can current domestic refining meet national demand today? No.
Can it guarantee even fifteen days of uninterrupted nationwide supply? No.

These are not opinions. They are capacity realities.

The unavoidable question, therefore, is this: how do you ensure price stability and product availability when domestic supply does not meet national demand?

The answer is imports.

Nigeria operates an open market economy. In such a system, domestic refiners and importers are subject to the same economic arithmetic. If any player sells below the true market price, they are deliberately absorbing losses. That approach is temporary by nature. It is not efficiency; it is attrition. The objective is simple—force competitors out, then reset prices upward once alternatives disappear.

Downstream pricing is not opaque. It is among the most transparent markets globally. Refining margins, freight rates, insurance, port charges, financing costs, and foreign exchange exposure are all benchmarked and publicly accessible. Anyone can compute landing costs. Anyone can identify artificial pricing.

That is precisely why regulation matters.

Consider Nigeria’s telecommunications sector without the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). We would not be debating marginal tariff adjustments today; we would be confronting multiples of current prices. Yet no one argues that regulation should exist solely to favour incumbent local operators, despite their massive capital investments. Why? Because doing so would stifle competition, deter future investment, and ultimately harm consumers.

The same logic applies to downstream petroleum.

Protect infrastructure. Safeguard supply. Regulate transparently. But do not distort the market under the illusion of protectionism. When regulation becomes selective, investment retreats. When investment retreats, supply contracts. When supply contracts, prices rise.

The objective is not to choose between domestic refining and imports. The objective is to bridge the gap between supply and demand without creating scarcity, instability, or investor flight.

Until domestic refining can reliably meet national demand at scale, imports are not a threat.

They are a stabiliser.

That is not ideology.
That is economics..

Continue Reading

Business

A New Dawn for Nigerians: Dangote Slashes Petrol Price to ₦699/Litre

Published

on

A New Dawn for Nigerians: Dangote Slashes Petrol Price to ₦699/Litre.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

“A Strategic Breakthrough in Economic Relief and Energy Sovereignty.”

 

In a momentous development poised to reverberate across Nigeria’s economic and social landscape, Dangote Petroleum Refinery has officially reduced the ex-depot price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly referred to as petrol, to ₦699 per litre, effective December 11, 2025. This significant reduction (from the previous gantry price of ₦828 per litre) marks a ₦129 drop, representing an approximate 15.58% decrease and stands as one of the most impactful fuel price adjustments of the year.

This landmark shift in pricing is more than a headline, it is a decisive blow to the entrenched pain point in the daily lives of Nigerians. For years, the spiralling cost of petrol has been cited as a catalyst for inflationary pressures, high transportation costs, and widespread hardship for ordinary citizens. Now, with petrol costing significantly less at the gantry, the potential for broader socio-economic relief cannot be overstated.

A Strategic Shift in Nigeria’s Fuel Economy. To fully appreciate the significance of this price cut, it is essential to contextualise its broader implications:

 

1. A Shift from Import Dependence to Local Refining

Nigeria though one of Africa’s largest crude oil producers has historically relied heavily on imported refined petroleum products, losing billions of dollars annually in foreign exchange expenditures. The result has been volatile prices, supply uncertainties, and an economy tethered to the whims of global markets.

 

The Dangote Refinery, with a refining capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, was constructed precisely to break this cycle of dependence. By locally refining crude oil into marketable petroleum products, the refinery represents a monumental step towards energy sovereignty, reducing foreign exchange outflows and stabilising domestic fuel availability.

 

Indeed, industry insiders have repeatedly pointed out that local refining should lead to more stable and affordable pricing over time, barring market distortions and distortive practices within the downstream sector.

 

Economic Relief: What ₦699 Means for Nigerians

For the average Nigerian commuter, trader, farmer, and small business owner, daily life is inextricably linked to the cost of fuel. Transport costs dictate the price of goods, and fuel affordability directly affects disposable income for millions.

 

Immediate Consumer Impact. Lower Gantry Cost: With the refinery selling petrol at ₦699 per litre, there is immediate potential for retail stations to offer petrol at significantly lower pump prices. Already, indications suggest that in Lagos, petrol may retail around ₦740 per litre, though final prices will vary across states and retailers.

Market Reaction: Private depots in key markets like Lagos have already responded to the competitive pricing environment by reducing their own ex-depot prices (in some cases to as low as ₦710 per litre) a direct ripple effect of Dangote’s pricing strategy.

 

Macro-Economic Implications. The reduction in gantry price can result in downward pressure on inflation. Transport operators, armed with access to cheaper petrol, may recalibrate their freight and passenger fares, offering relief to consumers and curbing cost-push inflation pressures commonly observed when fuel prices surge.

 

Furthermore, as fuel prices correlate with the cost of logistics, cheaper petrol can contribute to lower food prices, easing hunger and reducing the strain on household budgets.

 

Stakeholder and Expert Perspectives. The move has elicited wide commendation from industry experts and former policymakers who view it as a welcome relief to millions of Nigerians.

 

Citing Financial and Economic Expertise

Titus Okunronmu, a respected former Director of the Research Department at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), hailed the price reduction as “a welcome development that would bring significant relief to millions of Nigerians.” He emphasised that a persistent downward review of petrol prices (of which this is one of many) strengthens market stability and consumer confidence.

 

Such expert assessments underscore the broader positive externalities of the price cut (beyond mere cost savings) into market confidence and economic stability.

 

Market Dynamics: Competition, Losses, and Strategic Disruption

While the reduction is a boon for consumers, it challenges established market actors and particularly petrol importers who have traditionally dominated Nigeria’s fuel supply chain.

A New Dawn for Nigerians: Dangote Slashes Petrol Price to ₦699/Litre. By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Industry reports indicate that this aggressive pricing strategy by Dangote’s refinery may be inflicting substantial financial strains on independent marketers and importers, with estimated monthly losses in the region of ₦102 billion due to compressed margins as a result of Dangote’s competitive pricing.

 

Such a profound market shift is not just a pricing decision; it is a strategic disruption of a sector long dominated by import-heavy players commanding higher retail prices.

 

Dangote’s Strategic Vision and Nigeria’s Energy Future

Aliko Dangote (Africa’s richest businessman and the visionary behind the refinery) has reiterated the company’s steadfast commitment to ensuring that Nigerians are the primary beneficiaries of local refining capacity. He has highlighted that despite challenges from vested interests and resistance from some import-centric stakeholders, the refinery’s mission is to stabilise fuel supply, improve quality, and ensure competitive pricing.

 

Dangote’s rhetoric underscores a broader belief: Nigeria does not merely need a refinery; it needs a fuel system that prioritises citizens over profit margins skewed by imported pricing dynamics.

 

In his own words during a recent press engagement, Dangote stressed that “Nigerians have a choice: to buy better-quality fuel at an affordable price, or to buy blended PMS at a higher rate. Importers can continue to lose, as long as Nigerians benefit, I am happy.”

 

This declaration, bold and unapologetic, signals an embrace of market competition as a means of benefitting the populace with a refresher in corporate responsibility that aligns profit with the national interest.

 

Challenges on the Horizon. While this fuel price reduction is transformative, significant challenges remain:

 

Retail Pass-Through: Ensuring the gantry price reduction is fully and transparently reflected at petrol stations nationwide is not guaranteed. Logistics, retailer mark-ups, and regional cost variances may dilute the intended benefits.

 

Distribution Infrastructure: Nigeria’s vast geography and uneven distribution networks mean that urban centres like Lagos may see benefits sooner than rural regions.

 

Regulatory Uncertainties: Downstream regulatory frameworks, including tariff structures and import levies, continue to shape fuel pricing dynamics.

 

Nevertheless, this strategic pricing adjustment by a private refinery in a deregulated market signals renewed competition and a poignant counter-narrative to decades of import-dependent pricing. It throws a spotlight on the potential for domestic energy infrastructure to redefine national economic performance.

 

Final Word: A Pivotal Moment of Relief and Hope

Dangote Petroleum Refinery’s reduction of petrol’s ex-depot price to ₦699 per litre is far more than a numerical adjustment, it represents a tectonic shift in Nigeria’s fuel economy. It is a strategic blow against inflationary pressures, a relief for the struggling masses, and a rebuke of import-heavy pricing models that have long burdened the Nigerian economy.

 

As Nigerians watch this development unfold at the petrol pump and in the wider economy, one thing is clear: this is not merely a price cut, it is a clarion call for structural transformation in Nigeria’s energy sector.

 

In the words of one economic expert: “Relief does not come from rhetoric; it comes from tangible impacts on people’s lives.” With petrol now priced at ₦699 per litre, that relief may finally be here.

 

A New Dawn for Nigerians: Dangote Slashes Petrol Price to ₦699/Litre. By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Continue Reading

Business

MAKING THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR WORK FOR CITIZENS: NUPRC RESCUE MISSION

Published

on

*MAKING THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR WORK FOR CITIZENS: NUPRC RESCUE MISSION*

By James Itodo

 

The Nigerian oil and gas sector, since its discovery, exploration, and exploitation at the turn of the century, has become the goose that lays the golden egg, likened only to the much-sought-after bride.

This is because oil, and later gas, remained the main economic sustainer, accounting for virtually all the revenue utilised for the economic sustainability and stability of the country—a nation driven by a monolithic economy.

Various attempts at sustaining its viability failed because those reforms lacked the necessary ingredients and the political will of their drivers to succeed. Moreover, the temptation of the enormous amounts generated, and the ease of generating this revenue, became stronger than the moral responsibility and patriotic devotion of the country’s leaders, causing various rulers to rely completely on oil while abandoning or ignoring agriculture and every other means of generating revenue, including all forms of diversification and integration.

The present Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) was born out of necessity: first, to inherit the abnormalities of the past; and second, to set in motion reforms aimed at effectively repositioning the sector. Key among these is strong political will and the appropriate sensitisation of the country’s political leaders to look beyond oil and gas revenue and think towards diversification.

To carry this out effectively, there is a need to build trust and confidence on the fulcrum of accountability and transparency.
So far, the verdict has been positive. The basic recipe for repositioning and bringing about a volte-face in the sector is now present: accountability and transparency.

A new era, based on a better concept of transparency and accountability, is enhancing the effective repositioning of the Nigerian oil and gas sector, which will work for the overall benefit of all citizens and indeed residents.

Today, Nigerians are now seeing the oil and gas sector as a blessing, with transparency and accountability becoming the fulcrum of operations at the NUPRC.

There is no doubt that, for decades, Nigeria’s oil and gas sector was a cesspit of abhorrent and odious corruption, coupled with mismanagement—a centre of graft, earning the moniker “resource curse.”
Instead of bringing blessings to the country, it became an avenue for self-aggrandisement and self-enrichment at the detriment of national interest, economic growth, prosperity, and development.

As a whole, the sector’s opacity and lack of accountability led to widespread corruption, where the few who had access to this national wealth enriched themselves and their families—buying choice houses at highly exorbitant prices in prime cities of the world and sending their children to schools abroad on ear-splitting school fees, all with our common patrimony—at the expense of the country. This resulted in environmental degradation and human rights abuses, leaving citizens with little to show for the country’s vast oil resources, world oil production status, and its derived and associated wealth.

However, a new dawn has emerged with the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) leading a rescue mission to reposition the sector with renewed vigour, intentionality, and patriotic commitment under the leadership of Engr. Gbenga Komolafe, who has turned the NUPRC into a beacon of hope for Nigerians.
Unambiguously, the NUPRC’s commitment to transparency is demonstrated through its proactive disclosure of key industry data—which had previously been shrouded in obscurity—including production figures, revenue streams, and contract awards.

The demystification and openness of this key information have greatly enhanced the fostering of trust and confidence among stakeholders, including local communities, civil society organisations, and international partners.
Another signature reform is the strengthening and implementation of the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), which ensures that oil and gas revenues are transparently tracked and accounted for, thereby reducing corruption and ensuring that revenues are channelled for the overall benefit of all citizens.

Projecting the ideals of the Renewed Hope Agenda of the Tinubu-led administration, the NUPRC has also prioritised increased utilisation of local content development, bringing on board many more Nigerian companies to participate in the oil and gas value chain, thereby creating more jobs, stimulating economic growth, and empowering local communities.

The sector’s transformation is an unequivocal demonstration of the power of transparency and accountability.
Daily, Nigerians are beginning to see oil and gas resources as a direct blessing rather than a curse, with a sector and operators poised to drive economic growth, create jobs, and improve living standards.

However, this is just the beginning; the journey is far from over, and the best is yet to come—for all of us.
While Nigerians holistically embrace these reforms, they must also continue to demand transparency and accountability from their leaders, while the NUPRC’s efforts must be supported and sustained to ensure that the sector remains a catalyst for national development.

There is no doubt that the oil and gas sector can be a powerful catalytic tool for poverty reduction, wealth creation, and economic transformation. This can be imminently and necessarily achieved when the NUPRC continues in its commitment to transparency and accountability, predicated on the resilience of Nigerians, who will look forward to a brighter future where their natural resources work for them, not against them.

It must be a collaborative and conscientious responsibility of all Nigerians not only to support the NUPRC’s efforts and reforms targeted at transforming the oil and gas sector but also to demand consistent transparency and accountability from our leaders, as this will ensure that our natural resources benefit all Nigerians, securing a brighter future for Nigeria and Nigerians.

Itodo writes from Abuja

 

 

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending