Connect with us

society

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address

Published

on

Drug Abuse Among People With Disabilities: The Hidden Crisis Nigeria Is Yet to Address.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

“Neglect, stigma and policy gaps are fueling substance misuse among Nigeria’s most vulnerable and silence is costing lives.”

 

Nigeria likes to talk about inclusion, but talk without action has a human cost and one that is rarely counted. Behind closed doors and in the margins of health statistics, drug and substance misuse is wreaking havoc on people with disabilities (PWDs) across the country. This is not an unfortunate footnote; it is a predictable outcome of exclusion (social, medical and legal) that we have chosen to ignore.

Global and local evidence points to the same uncomfortable truth: people with disabilities are at higher risk of substance use and are less likely to receive appropriate treatment. International studies show that adults with disabilities report disproportionately high rates of substance use and adverse mental health symptoms compared with their non-disabled peers. These patterns are mediated by chronic pain, untreated mental-health disorders, social isolation and poverty with all conditions common among Nigerian PWDs.

Why this happens is painfully simple. Many people with disabilities live with chronic pain or long-term health conditions for which medication is necessary; others face untreated depression, anxiety and trauma. When health systems are inaccessible, poorly resourced, or openly hostile, self-medication becomes an easy (and dangerous) option. Add stigma and social exclusion and the risk escalates: illicit substances, alcohol, codeine-laden cough syrups and diverted prescription drugs become stopgap “TREATMENTS” for pain, loneliness and despair. The World Health Organization explicitly warns that persons with disabilities are more likely to face risk factors for tobacco, alcohol and drug use because they are often left out of public health interventions.

In Nigeria the problem has particular features. National-level surveys and UN estimates indicate that drug use is widespread in the country: a sizeable share of Nigerians between 15 and 64 (measured in millions) are affected by drug misuse, and substances such as tramadol and codeine-based syrups have become common in both urban and rural settings. Meanwhile, enforcement-focused headlines about drug seizures and legislative crackdowns obscure the human reality: far too many people who need treatment cannot access it. UN reporting notes that globally only about one in eleven people with drug use disorders receive treatment — an equity gap that hits PWDs especially hard.

There are three converging failures driving this hidden crisis in Nigeria.

1. Health systems and services are inaccessible or ill-equipped.
Rehabilitation, mental-health care and substance-use treatment services in Nigeria are chronically underfunded and concentrated in a handful of urban centres. Even where services exist, they are rarely adapted for persons with sensory, cognitive or mobility impairments — meaning that facilities, intake procedures, therapy methods and communication approaches exclude those who most need help. Research in multiple settings has shown that substance-use screening and treatment must include disability accommodations and comprehensive pain management; otherwise, PWDs fall through the cracks.

2. Stigma and social isolation push vulnerable people into substance use.
Violence, neglect and discrimination against children and adults with disabilities are well documented. International studies report alarmingly high rates of abuse and neglect of disabled children and teenagers — environments that predispose survivors to substance misuse later in life. In Nigeria, cultural stigma combined with poverty and lack of social protection amplifies the risk: ostracised individuals may turn to substances to cope with trauma and exclusion.

3. Policy and legal frameworks exist but are not implemented or aligned.
Nigeria’s Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities (Prohibition) Act 2018 created legal obligations to integrate and protect PWDs. That law, however, has not been matched by robust investment in disability-aware mental-health services, nor by targeted substance-use programs for PWDs. At the same time, the country’s current public conversation often leans toward punitive measures against drug offenders rather than public-health strategies that address addiction as a medical and social problem. Recent moves in the legislature to stiffen criminal penalties for trafficking, while addressing supply-side harms, risk further marginalising people who need treatment rather than punishment.

What must be done is clear, if politically uncomfortable: treat this as a public-health and human-rights emergency, not an embarrassing exception to be hidden.

First, expand access to disability-inclusive treatment. Health facilities and substance-use programs must be made physically and clinically accessible. That means ramps and sign-language interpretation, yes — but also adapting clinical screening tools, counseling approaches and pain-management strategies to different impairment types. International evidence shows that substance-use interventions that account for pain and comorbid mental disorders reduce misuse and improve outcomes; Nigeria must tailor these approaches and scale them beyond elite urban clinics.

Second, invest in community-based prevention and social protection. Poverty, unemployment and social isolation are key drivers. Cash transfers, supported employment schemes, community rehabilitation programs and family support can reduce the conditions that lead people to self-medicate. Civil-society organisations and disabled-persons organisations (DPOs) are best placed to guide culturally appropriate prevention work — they must be funded and partnered with, not sidelined.

Third, collect the right data. You cannot manage what you do not measure. National surveys and drug-control reports must disaggregate by disability status, impairment type and gender. That data gap means policymakers have no reliable estimate of the scale of the problem among PWDs — and therefore no political imperative to act. Recent Nigerian and international studies give us indications; what we need is systematic, routine surveillance integrated into national drug and health surveys.

Fourth, shift from punishment to treatment. Public policy must rebalance from criminalisation toward evidence-based treatment and harm reduction. Where trafficking and organised crime require law enforcement, do so — but not at the cost of denying care to people with addiction who are also living with disabilities. The human-rights implications of mandatory incarceration for people with mental-health comorbidities must be taken seriously.

Finally, we must break the silence. Families, communities and politicians treat disability as a private tragedy. Addiction among PWDs becomes doubly invisible: the stigma of disability plus the stigma of drug use. Nigeria’s media, universities and policy forums must expose this reality and hold leaders accountable for the gap between the law’s promise and the lived experience of millions.

To the policymakers reading this: the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities Act 2018 is not a placard to be posted on ministry walls — it is a legal platform that demands resources, enforcement and services. To the NDLEA and health ministries: seize the moment to partner with DPOs, donors and community groups to pilot disability-inclusive treatment models that can be scaled nationwide. To civil society: press for data, for pilots and for funding that reaches grassroots organisations.

Addiction among people with disabilities is not a “special interest” issue — it is a test of our humanity. If a nation claims to value inclusion, then it must protect the most vulnerable from a tide of substances, neglect and institutional failure. Anything less is hypocrisy.

If Nigeria does not act, the toll will grow: more lives shortened, families broken and talents wasted. But if we choose compassion, transparency and evidence, we can transform a hidden crisis into a model of inclusive care. The legislation is on the books; now let our actions prove that we meant it.

Sahara weekly online is published by First Sahara weekly international. contact [email protected]

society

The Best You Can Have (Or Leave Behind) Is Investing in Humanity

Published

on

The Best You Can Have (Or Leave Behind) Is Investing in Humanity. By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

The Best You Can Have (Or Leave Behind) Is Investing in Humanity.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

“Why building people is the highest-return legacy we can leave.”

There are fortunes you can spend and fortunes you can hoard. There are mansions that crumble and trusts that dissolve. But there is a single kind of investment that never truly depreciates: the investment in people. When we plant knowledge, health, opportunity and dignity in human beings, we fertilize futures for individuals, families, communities and whole nations. Put bluntly: MONEY spent on people compounds into safer streets, healthier economies, stronger democracies and a more humane world.

This is not SENTIMENTALISM. It is economics, ethics and hard evidence braided into one unarguable truth: human-capital investments deliver some of the most consistent (and measurable) returns of any expenditure a society can make. For instance, decades of global data show that each additional year of schooling raises an individual’s hourly earnings by roughly 9-10 percent; a return that lifts households and powers economies.

Education is the foundational example because it proves the principle in plain sight. Nelson Mandela understood this when he declared that “education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” That sentence is not merely rhetorical; it is a blueprint: equipped with learning, people can imagine alternatives, challenge injustice and build markets; and their children inherit that possibility.

Though education is only one axis of human investment. Health is another. The World Health Organization and allied studies show that well-targeted health spending can produce huge economic benefits and in some analyses returning as much as 40% growth effects over a five-year horizon by increasing productivity, reducing catastrophic household spending and preventing economic disruption. Put differently: vaccinating, treating and preventing disease is an investment that pays in lives saved and incomes protected.

Philosophy and policy converge here. Nobel laureate Amartya Sen framed development not as GDP alone but as expanding people’s capabilities but the real freedoms they need to be the authors of their lives. Economic growth that ignores human development is hollow; real prosperity is built when people’s freedoms, education and health are improved together. Investing in humanity is therefore not a charitable aside to development but it is the engine of sustainable development itself.

That engine runs on choices. Governments choose budgets, donors choose causes, business leaders choose hiring and training policies and citizens choose whether to care for the neighbor’s child as well as their own. When Muhammad Yunus, a pioneer of microfinance, speaks of doing business that serves human needs (not just profit) he is speaking to the same ethic: human-centred investment creates resilience and dignity and also it transforms poverty from a permanent condition into a solvable problem.

Why is the return on human investment so reliable? Because people are both producers and consumers. Educated, healthy people innovate; they create businesses, adopt new technologies, pay taxes and participate in civic life. When a child completes another year of schooling, the entire household’s earning potential shifts upward; when immunization coverage expands, communities avoid medical shocks that can bury families in debt. These ripple effects multiply across generations. The sums are not abstract: they reflect better lives and measurable economic growth.

The moral argument is inseparable from the pragmatic one. Investing in human beings is an investment in justice. When we prioritize education for girls, health for the poorest, vocational training for displaced youth and dignity for the marginalized, we reduce inequality, social fracture and societies that hold together are also safer and more prosperous. That is why development thinkers and frontline practitioners keep returning to the same prescription: spend on people first.

How should societies translate that prescription into practice? Policy must follow evidence. A few high-impact priorities should guide any serious investment in humanity:

Universal basic health coverage and early childhood interventions. Preventive care, maternal and child health, and vaccinations deliver outsized returns by protecting human capital before it is lost. WHO technical and investment analyses show that targeted interventions for mothers and young children produce wide-ranging economic and social benefits.

Universal access to quality schooling and to post-school technical and tertiary opportunities. The lifetime returns to an extra year of schooling are well-documented; tertiary education can return even higher income gains, particularly in regions where advanced skills are scarce. Investment must be matched to quality, relevance and equity so that marginalised students truly benefit.

Support for social enterprises and microfinance that unlock local entrepreneurship. In contexts of extreme poverty, access to small credit and support for social businesses empowers people to transform survival strategies into sustainable livelihoods. Muhammad Yunus’s work illustrates the catalytic effect of enabling entrepreneurial agency rather than merely dispensing charity.

Lifelong learning and labour-market alignment. The economy changes fast; investing in adult reskilling and apprenticeships keeps workers relevant and prevents entire communities from being left behind. This is not charity, it is smart risk management for societies facing technological disruption.

Civic and moral education that binds communities. Human investment must produce citizens capable of empathy, critical thought and cooperation. Without social cohesion, the material returns on education and health can be eroded by corruption, conflict or mistrust.

There are myths to dispel. Investing in people is not merely an expense that drains public coffers; it is a productive capital allocation. It does not require an either/or choice between infrastructure and people: real infrastructure (roads, energy, internet) amplifies the payoff of human investments. Nor is investment in humanity naively idealistic; it is the clearest route to durable economic gain.

The practical finance follows. Budgets should be rebalanced to reflect these long-term returns. Donors and private investors should treat education, health and human-centred enterprises as assets, not subsidies. Businesses should internalize social returns by training workers and sourcing locally. And civil society must hold institutions accountable when short-term politics underfunds long-term human capital.

Finally, legacy matters. Wealth that dies with a person but leaves no change in other lives is fragile. The best estate is one that seeds scholarships, hospitals, schools and enterprises; structures that outlast any single lifespan. The greatest tribute we can make to our children is not a house full of consumer goods but a world where those children can live healthy, educated, capable lives.

If you want a tidy summation to hang above a lifetime of action: invest in a human and you invest in a future; invest in many humans and you change history. The evidence, the ethics and the experience of giants is from Mandela’s insistence on education to Amartya Sen’s capability framework and Yunus’s social business model and all point to the same verdict. When we place our capital and our conscience on human beings, the returns are measured not only in currency but in lives realized, dignity restored and futures unlocked.

Let every policy, donation and personal choice be weighed by this standard: WILL THIS INVESTMENT MAKE PEOPLE FREER, HEALTHIER, WISER OR MORE CAPABLE? If the answer is YES, then you are not merely spending, You are building. And that, in the ledger of human history, is wealth that never depreciates.

George Omagbemi Sylvester is the author. Published by saharaweeklyng.com.

 

The Best You Can Have (Or Leave Behind) Is Investing in Humanity.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

Continue Reading

society

Holding You Against Your Will: Why Our Freedom Truly Matters.

Published

on

Holding You Against Your Will: Why Our Freedom Truly Matters.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

 

“How the denial of liberty crushes dignity, opportunity and progress and why reclaiming freedom is the first, last and only path to justice.”

Holding You Against Your Will: Why Our Freedom Truly Matters.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

Freedom is not a decorative privilege or a political gift bestowed by those in power. It is the core substance of human dignity, the foundation upon which every modern society is built, and the indispensable right that determines whether a human being is treated as a person or as a possession. To be held against your will — whether through physical detention, economic oppression, legislative injustice, or deliberate bureaucratic cruelty — is to be stripped of the very oxygen of humanity. This essay exposes the many faces of unfreedom, including one of the most shameful contemporary examples: the arrest and detention of foreign nationals for documentation the host country itself refuses to issue.

At the moral level, freedom is non-negotiable. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states unequivocally: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” This is not poetic language — it is a binding ethical standard. Any government or institution that undermines liberty undermines the global moral order and breaks faith with the universal principles that hold civilization together. When a person is confined, coerced, or punished unjustly, the offense goes beyond the individual; it is an assault on humanity’s shared dignity.

 

Freedom as the Engine of Human Development

Nobel laureate Amartya Sen provides one of the most powerful frameworks for understanding why freedom matters beyond emotion. In Development as Freedom, he argues that liberties — political, social, and economic — are the mechanisms through which societies progress. Freedom is not a luxury; it is the engine of development, innovation, and social harmony. When people can choose, speak, work, move, and organize without fear, possibilities expand. When these freedoms are constrained, societies stagnate, talent dies, and poverty deepens.

 

This is why the denial of documentation to foreign nationals — followed by their arrest for lacking the same documents — is one of the most grotesque modern forms of unfreedom. It is a deliberate entrapment, a manufactured criminality, and a violation of the fundamental human right to liberty.

 

When You Are Arrested for Papers the Host Country Refuses to Provide

Across various countries, especially in regions struggling with immigration policy, migrants and foreign nationals face an unconscionable paradox:

They are expected to possess valid documentation, yet the same governments often refuse, delay, or frustrate the issuance or renewal of these documents.

 

Then comes the nightmare:

They are arrested, detained, or threatened with deportation for not having the very papers the state intentionally withholds.

 

This is not law enforcement — this is systemic harassment.

This is not immigration management — this is state-induced vulnerability.

This is not justice — this is engineered captivity.

 

Respected migration scholars have described this phenomenon as “administrative violence” — the use of bureaucracy to punish, immobilize, and control individuals without the transparency or accountability that accompanies normal legal processes. Criminologist Dr. Didier Fassin calls such practices “the criminalization of mere existence.”

 

To arrest a person for a document they cannot obtain is to hold them against their will in the purest and most destructive sense.

 

The Psychological and Social Violence of Forced Detention

Detention — especially unjust detention — destroys more than physical freedom. It erodes dignity, shatters mental stability, and silences potential. Philosopher John Stuart Mill’s powerful declaration remains timeless: “Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.” When a state violates that sovereignty, the result is humiliation, broken trust, and civic alienation.

 

Foreign nationals who are detained for documentation issues experience more than temporary confinement:

 

They lose jobs and income.

 

Their children suffer educational and emotional trauma.

 

Their mental health deteriorates through fear, uncertainty, and stigma.

They become targets of xenophobia and public suspicion.

 

They are treated as criminals without having committed a crime.

 

The injustice is compounded by the knowledge that their only “offense” is being trapped by a system designed to fail them.

 

The Political and Economic Cost of Denying Freedom

Societies that weaponize documentation or manipulate immigration laws pay a heavy price:

 

They lose the contributions of skilled workers.

 

They drive innovation and entrepreneurship out of their borders.

 

They weaken social cohesion.

 

They damage international reputation and diplomatic credibility.

 

They create cycles of resentment, fear, and hostility.

 

Freedom House reports that societies restricting personal liberties or targeting minorities with arbitrary detention experience higher instability, weaker economies, and declining democratic ratings. Political repression does not produce safety — it produces fragility.

 

Freedom Is Never Voluntarily Given

In Letter from Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote:

“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

 

This applies not only to citizens but also to migrants, asylum seekers, and foreign nationals living under unjust administrative structures. Freedom must be insisted upon — legally, socially, diplomatically, and morally.

 

Freedom Is Responsibility, Not Chaos

Nelson Mandela reminds us:

“To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.”

 

True freedom thrives in societies where:

 

Laws protect, not persecute.

 

Institutions serve, not suffocate.

 

Documentation systems enable, not entrap.

 

Immigration frameworks respect human dignity, not exploit vulnerability.

 

What Must Be Done

To prevent people from being held against their will — physically or administratively — societies must:

 

Guarantee transparent and fair documentation processes for migrants and foreign nationals.

 

End detention for documentation the state refuses to issue.

 

Establish independent oversight to prevent abuse.

 

Ensure that immigration enforcement aligns with international human rights standards.

 

Educate the public to dismantle the xenophobic narratives that justify these injustices.

 

Hold leaders and institutions accountable for policies that violate human dignity.

 

Summative Insight: Freedom Is Humanity’s Most Sacred Asset

Being held against your will (whether in a jail cell, a detention center, or inside the invisible cage of bureaucratic oppression) is the most brutal violation of human dignity. Freedom is not optional; it is the priceless heartbeat of existence. When states arrest people for documents they themselves refuse to provide, they are not ENFORCING LAW; they are MANUFACTURING INJUSTICE.

 

A society that cannot protect liberty will never achieve peace, progress, or prosperity.

And a people who do not defend their freedom will eventually lose it.

 

Freedom is the one inheritance we cannot afford to bargain away. It must be defended, protected, insisted upon, and expanded — for ourselves and for everyone who calls our society home.

 

Holding You Against Your Will: Why Our Freedom Truly Matters.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

Continue Reading

society

BON 2025: Obasa Endows Best Indigenous Movie

Published

on

BON 2025: Obasa Endows Best Indigenous Movie

…As Addme, Indomie, Abundish Join Award Sponsors

 

Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa has graciously endowed the coveted Best Indigenous Movie (Yoruba) category at the 2025 Best of Nollywood Awards holding this Sunday, December 14, at the Wole Soyinka Centre for Culture and Creative Arts (formerly known as the National Arts Theatre), Iganmu, Lagos.

The founder of BON Awards, Seun Oloketuyi, says, “Rt. Hon. Obasa’s endowment of the award underscores his passion and promotion of the Yoruba Language. Indeed, he has always been at the forefront of the preservation of our rich cultural narratives through film, and his endowment of the Best Indigenous Movie award emphasises this in no small measure.”

Further bolstering the prestigious awards ceremony, now in its 17th year, are corporate sponsors like Addme, which has endowed the Best Actress of the Year category, while Indomie shows its support for emerging talent through the Best Child Actor award.

Abundish, an agricultural produce wholesaler, highlights the creative technical aspects of filmmaking by endowing the Best Use of Food in a Movie category.

Oloketuyi noted that these endorsements provide crucial resources and prestige to the categories, ensuring the continued celebration of authentic storytelling and technical innovation within the industry.

Further, he said, “This year’s awards are not only a recognition of Nollywood’s best creative and technical talents but also a showcase of significant corporate and private support for the industry. These endowments underscore the value placed on acting prowess and the creative technical elements that bring our stories to life while underlining a strategic partnership between the film industry and various high-profile entities and personalities.”

The BON Awards 2025 will be hosted by the dynamic duo of Bukunmi ‘KieKie’ Adeaga-Ilori and Adams Ibrahim Adebola, popularly known as VJ Adams, with the Executive Governor of Lagos State, Mr Babajide Sanwo-Olu, serving as the official Host Governor. The ceremony promises to be a spectacular celebration of cinematic excellence.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending