Connect with us

society

EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE SECRETED SCHEME TO CASH IN ON LIBYA’S BILLIONS

Published

on

EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE SECRETED SCHEME TO CASH IN ON LIBYA’S BILLIONS

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG

“How newly released documents reveal an attempted exploitation of Libya’s frozen wealth before and after Gaddafi — and what it means for justice, sovereignty, and global finance.”

In one of the most startling and geopolitically charged revelations of the decade, newly released documents from the Epstein Files (a vast tranche of records linked to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein) have unveiled a clandestine blueprint to profit from Libya’s immense frozen state assets during a period of political upheaval that began in 2011. More than a decade after the overthrow and death of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, these records outline plans that, if carried out, risked transforming a nation’s sovereign wealth into the private windfall of global financiers, intermediaries, and former intelligence operatives. The implications extend far beyond financial opportunism, touching the core of international law, post-conflict reconstruction and the fragile sovereignty of states emerging from chaos.

 

Libya’s Frozen Fortune: The Lure of Billions.
At the heart of these revelations is an email dated July 2011 sent to Epstein by an associate that outlines a proposal to pursue access to Libyan state assets that were frozen abroad in the wake of the NATO-backed uprising that toppled Gaddafi. At the time, the United Nations imposed freezes on Libyan assets under Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973, designed to limit the Gaddafi regime’s access to funds during the conflict. However, this freeze also created a pool of state wealth (estimated at around $80 billion, including $32.4 billion held in the United States) that was suddenly susceptible to external legal and financial manoeuvring.
According to the email, the actual value of what was described as “sovereign, stolen and misappropriated” assets could be three to four times larger than the $80 billion figure, suggesting a potential trove exceeding hundreds of billions. “If we can identify or recover just 5 to 10 percent of these monies and receive between 10 and 25 percent as compensation, we are talking about billions of dollars,” the correspondence stated, framing the operation as a lucrative business opportunity rather than a sovereign asset recovery.

The email went further, painting a picture of Libya as not only a ripe target for asset recovery but also a future hub of investment: one that, if engaged early, could “become their go-to guys” for reconstruction work. The correspondence noted projections that Libya would need to spend at least $100 billion on rebuilding its economy and infrastructure, positioning the scheme as a gateway into a multi-billion-dollar market tied to reconstruction and legal services.

EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE SECRETED SCHEME TO CASH IN ON LIBYA’S BILLIONS
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG

Former Spies and International Networks
What transforms this from opportunistic financial speculation into a geopolitical intrigue is the involvement of former intelligence personnel. The email references preliminary discussions with former agents from Britain’s MI6 and Israel’s Mossad, and suggests that some members expressed willingness to help identify and trace Libyan assets abroad is a stark illustration of how intelligence networks can be folded into private financial projects that operate in the grey intersection of influence, law and power.

The use of former intelligence officials in legal and asset-recovery matters is not inherently illegitimate; in many cases, their expertise in tracing financial flows and navigating international systems can aid legitimate restitution efforts. However, in the context of this proposal (where the stated objective was profit extraction for private benefit unaffiliated with Libya’s legitimate government) the lines between recovery, coercion, and exploitation become perilously blurred.

Sovereignty, Asset Recovery and International Law.
The emergence of these documents has reignited a long-standing debate over sovereign asset freezes and the ethics of asset recovery. Scholars and policy experts emphasize that frozen funds belong to the people of the state in question, and that any recovery or release should serve the sovereign interests of that nation and not the private ambitions of third parties. According to analysis published by the International Crisis Group, efforts to reform sanctions and allow asset reinvestment must be conducted with “the consent of Libya’s legitimate authorities,” and designed to benefit the Libyan people rather than external interests.

The complex legal landscape surrounding frozen Libyan assets has already resulted in numerous litigations. Libya has fought cases in European courts, including against global finance giants such as Goldman Sachs, while also seeking pathways to unlock portions of its sovereign wealth for national development and economic revival. However, political fragmentation (a persistent challenge in Libya’s civil conflict) has frequently stalled progress, underscoring how easily frozen assets can become political bargaining chips rather than tools for reconstruction.

As legal expert Mohammed bin Shaaban observed in recent reporting on Libya’s asset situation, the maze of international litigation and competing claims has left much of the country’s wealth inaccessible and shifts in governance further complicate matters. Such dynamics underline the inherent risk when third parties position themselves as intermediaries in sovereign matters without clear legal mandate or ethical grounding.

Libya’s Fragile Context and Corruption Complexities
Understanding the Epstein scheme also requires acknowledging the broader context of Libya’s political instability and deeply entrenched corruption.

Transparency International consistently ranks Libya among the lowest globally on the Corruption. Perceptions Index, a stark reflection of systemic governance challenges since Gaddafi’s fall. That corruption has extended into the management of state resources and has complicated efforts to ensure that any recovered assets serve the public good rather than private pockets.
This offers a sobering backdrop to the Epstein correspondence. What might at first appear as financial opportunism can also be interpreted (in the harshest light) as a schemed attempt to exploit both the political disarray and the legal ambiguity surrounding Libya’s frozen assets for private advantage. In environments where rule of law is weak and sovereign authority is contested, external actors can, intentionally or otherwise, exert disproportionate influence over outcomes.

Ethics of Engagement and the Limits of Opportunism.
The revelations raise essential questions about ethical boundaries in international finance and asset recovery. The stated willingness of international law firms to work on a contingency fee basis (paid only upon success) reflects common practice in asset litigation. Yet the inclusion of such firms alongside former intelligence operatives underlines how humanitarian, legal and economic projects can be co-opted into efforts aimed at generating private profit under the guise of public service.

Experts argue that genuine asset recovery should be driven by transparent legal frameworks, international cooperation and unwavering commitment to justice for victimized populations. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and other multilateral bodies have long emphasized that illicit financial flows hamper development and that asset recovery must be anchored in lawful restitution not speculative gain.

The Road Ahead: A Cautionary Tale for Post-Conflict Economies.
The Epstein Files revelations about Libya serve as a potent reminder of the perils facing nations emerging from conflict: when enormous sovereign wealth is frozen or in legal limbo, it attracts not only legitimate legal claims but also those driven by speculation and profit. What should be a process grounded in restoring national wealth and dignity can become a theatre for the powerful to profit off instability.

In a world grappling with conflict-induced asset freezes (from Libya to other nations displaced by war or sanctions) the imperative is clear: international law and ethical standards must protect sovereign assets, ensure their return benefits the people to whom they belong, and guard against schemes that would commodify national misfortune into private fortune. Only through principled engagement and rigorous accountability can the promise of rebuilding shattered states be realised without handing over their priceless heritage to opportunists.

 

 

EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE SECRETED SCHEME TO CASH IN ON LIBYA’S BILLIONS
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG

society

Iworo FM 96.3 Celebrates First Anniversary in Grand Style

Published

on

*Iworo FM 96.3 Celebrates First Anniversary in Grand Style

 

Nigeria’s foremost indigenous radio station, Iworo FM 96.3, on Saturday, 7th February 2026, celebrated its first anniversary in grand style.

 

The event attracted several notable personalities from Iworo and its environs, including the traditional ruler, the Oniworo of Iworo-Awori Kingdom, Oba (Dr.) Oladele Friday Kosoko; the Chairman of Olorunda LCDA, Hon. Ajose Peter Kumayon; Oba of Apa kingdom, Christian and Muslim clerics, among others.

 

The glamorous event commenced with a session of thanksgiving to appreciate God for the success of the radio station since its establishment in 2025. The organisers acknowledged the challenges encountered along the way but expressed gratitude to God for His intervention and support in ensuring the station rose above all odds.

Iworo FM 96.3 Celebrates First Anniversary in Grand Style

According to the Oba of Apa kingdom, the presence of Iworo FM has brought significant development to the environment. He stated that the station has introduced Iworo Kingdom to people beyond its immediate community and has largely placed it on the national map. He further noted the tremendous progress recorded in the station’s operations and commended the management for their foresight, which has benefited everyone in Iworo.

 

“Iworo FM is a good initiative that has attracted development to the community. It has placed Iworo Kingdom on the national map, all thanks to the amazing and laudable work of the management. Within one year, there has been tremendous progress in the operations of this radio station. I am glad to see the improvements and also congratulate the people of Iworo for having an investment like this,” he said.

 

Similarly, awards were presented to the management of the radio station by 1423 Communications in recognition of the station’s impact in the broadcasting industry.

The communication company presented awards for the Fastest Rising Indigenous Radio Station in the Badagry–Iworo axis and Best Radio Station in Breaking News Coverage Across the Interlands.

 

Speaking through its representative, the company explained that Iworo FM 96.3 has performed commendably well within a short period and truly deserves the accolades it has received.

 

“Iworo FM deserves all the accolades it is getting because it has done exceedingly well for the community and Lagos State as a whole. These awards are the result of careful observation of the station’s operations and activities. It is indeed marvellous,” the representative said.

While receiving the awards, Oba Oladele Friday Kosoko, who also serves as the Board Chairman, expressed appreciation to the communication company, noting that he would continue to remain committed to the growth of the radio station.

 

“We are very happy with this award. It shows that we are being watched, and to be considered for these laudable awards means a lot to us. I will continue to show commitment to this radio station and will do even more as we move forward in the coming years,” he said.

 

The event also featured raffle draws, during which participants won various items including fans, bags of rice, clothing materials, and other food items.

Continue Reading

society

Digital Colonialism or Market Reality? Nigerian Media Demand Urgent Government Action on Global Tech Giants

Published

on

Digital Colonialism or Market Reality? Nigerian Media Demand Urgent Government Action on Global Tech Giants

By George Omagbemi Sylvester

 

“Local publishers warn that unchecked dominance by foreign platforms threatens the survival of independent journalism and the nation’s control over its information ecosystem.”

 

Nigeria’s major media advocacy organisations have called on the Presidency and the National Assembly to urgently intervene in the country’s digital information space, warning that the dominance of global technology platforms could erode national sovereignty over public discourse and push local journalism toward collapse.

 

The appeal, made in Abuja in early February 2026, represents one of the most direct and coordinated demands yet from Nigerian media stakeholders for government action against what they describe as “foreign digital control” of the country’s information ecosystem.

Digital Colonialism or Market Reality? Nigerian Media Demand Urgent Government Action on Global Tech Giants

By George Omagbemi Sylvester

According to reports from the capital, the groups argued that powerful global technology companies (primarily American-owned digital platforms) now control the channels through which most Nigerians access news, advertising and public information.

 

Their warning is stark: without urgent policy intervention, Nigeria risks surrendering both its media economy and its democratic information space to corporations that operate beyond the country’s regulatory reach.

 

What happened

The coalition of media-centred organisations issued a public call for government action, urging the Presidency and lawmakers to address what they described as the growing dominance of foreign digital platforms in Nigeria’s information environment.

 

They warned that the country could lose effective control over its public discourse if local media institutions continue to weaken while global technology companies expand their influence.

 

The intervention was framed as both an economic and national-interest concern, with the groups stressing that local publishers are increasingly dependent on platforms such as Google, Facebook and other global tech firms for audience reach and advertising revenue.

 

Where and when

The call was made in Abuja, Nigeria’s federal capital, and reported publicly in early February 2026, following consultations among major media stakeholders.

 

Who is involved

The report identified a coalition of leading Nigerian media-centred organisations, though it did not list all participating groups in the initial dispatch.

 

However, across Nigeria’s media landscape, key organisations that have repeatedly raised similar concerns in recent years include:

Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE)

 

Newspaper Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (NPAN)

 

Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria (BON)

 

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) in digital-rights contexts

 

For example, the Nigerian Guild of Editors has previously warned that financial pressures threaten the survival of news organisations, stressing that without viable media, democracy itself is weakened.

 

Why it happened

At the core of the dispute is the transformation of the global media economy. Over the last decade, advertising revenue (once the financial backbone of newspapers and broadcasters) has migrated to digital platforms.

 

These platforms now act as the primary gateways through which audiences discover news content. Yet, according to publishers, the bulk of the advertising income generated around that content flows to the platforms rather than the news organisations that produce it.

 

Competition inquiries in other countries illustrate the scale of the shift. In South Africa, for instance, estimates suggest that internet giants captured up to 60 percent of local advertising revenue over a decade, severely weakening traditional newsrooms.

Similarly, studies have found that platforms control over user data gives them a decisive advantage in targeted advertising, further undermining publishers’ revenue streams.

 

This structural imbalance, Nigerian media groups argue, is now playing out in their own country and also threatening the financial sustainability of journalism.

 

How the dominance works

The influence of global platforms operates through several mechanisms:

Algorithmic control:

Search engines and social media algorithms determine which news stories audiences see, often prioritising larger international outlets or sensational content over local reporting.

 

Advertising concentration:

Platforms collect vast amounts of user data, allowing them to dominate digital advertising markets and attract revenue that once funded newsrooms.

 

Traffic dependence:

Many local publishers now rely heavily on social media and search platforms for website traffic. Changes in platform policies can instantly reduce readership and income.

 

These dynamics, media stakeholders say, create a dependency cycle in which local journalism produces content that drives engagement on global platforms, but receives little financial return.

 

The Nigerian context

Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, has one of the continent’s largest digital audiences. Social media platforms are deeply embedded in everyday communication, commerce and politics.

 

Facebook alone is used by tens of millions of Nigerians, and for many small businesses and independent publishers it serves as a primary distribution channel.

 

This dominance has already triggered regulatory tensions. In 2024, Nigeria’s competition authorities imposed a $220 million fine on Meta over alleged anti-competitive practices and data-privacy violations.

 

The dispute escalated to the point where the company warned it might withdraw services rather than comply, highlighting the power imbalance between national regulators and global tech corporations.

 

Global precedents

Nigeria’s media groups are not alone in raising such concerns. Around the world, governments and publishers have taken steps to rebalance the relationship between news organisations and digital platforms.

 

Australia, Canada and parts of Europe have introduced laws requiring platforms to negotiate payments with publishers. South Africa’s competition authorities have also recommended financial compensation from platforms to local media houses.

 

These global developments have emboldened Nigerian media stakeholders to push for similar policies.

 

Voices from the field

Media leaders and scholars have long warned about the consequences of an economically weakened press.

Eze Anaba, President of the Nigerian Guild of Editors, recently noted that if media organisations cannot sustain their operations, the consequences extend beyond journalism itself.

He warned: “If the media cannot keep journalists employed, it cannot inform citizens and without an informed citizenry, democracy is weakened.”

International policy experts echo similar concerns. Emily Bell, director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, has argued that platforms have fundamentally reshaped the news economy, often without assuming the responsibilities traditionally borne by publishers.

 

She observed:

“The platforms have taken a significant share of advertising and attention while investing little in the production of journalism itself.”

 

Likewise, media economist Robert Picard has repeatedly warned that the collapse of advertising revenue threatens the viability of independent journalism worldwide.

 

“Without sustainable funding, news organisations cannot perform their essential democratic functions,” he wrote in his research on media economics.

 

What the media groups want

Although the full details of their proposals are still emerging, the Nigerian coalition is believed to be seeking:

Regulatory measures to ensure fair competition between local media and global platforms

 

Financial arrangements or compensation models for news content

 

Stronger enforcement of data-protection and competition laws

 

Policies that support the sustainability of local journalism

 

Their appeal to the Presidency and the National Assembly signals a push for legislative or regulatory intervention rather than voluntary agreements with tech companies.

 

The stakes for Nigeria

The outcome of this dispute could shape the future of Nigeria’s information ecosystem.

If local media continue to lose revenue and influence, the country risks:

Shrinking newsrooms and reduced investigative reporting

 

Greater dependence on foreign-owned information platforms

 

Increased vulnerability to misinformation and algorithmic bias

 

Weakening of democratic accountability

 

Conversely, heavy-handed regulation could also trigger unintended consequences, including service withdrawals, reduced investment or restrictions on digital innovation.

 

The broader struggle for digital sovereignty

Across Africa, governments and regulators are grappling with the challenge of asserting digital sovereignty while maintaining open internet ecosystems.

Competition authorities in several African countries have begun coordinating efforts to address the power of dominant digital platforms and ensure fair market conditions.

 

The Nigerian media groups’ appeal therefore reflects not just a domestic concern, but a continental and global struggle over who controls the digital public square.

 

The road ahead

For now, the ball lies with Nigeria’s political leadership. Whether the government chooses to pursue regulation, negotiation, or a hybrid approach will determine the trajectory of the country’s media sector.

 

What is clear, however, is that the traditional economic model of journalism has already been disrupted. The debate is no longer about whether global tech platforms wield enormous influence, but about how nations like Nigeria can adapt their laws and institutions to ensure that independent journalism survives in the digital age.

 

As the Abuja coalition warned, the issue is not merely commercial. It is existential—touching on the survival of local media, the integrity of public discourse and the future of democratic accountability in Africa’s most populous nation.

 

Digital Colonialism or Market Reality? Nigerian Media Demand Urgent Government Action on Global Tech Giants

By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Continue Reading

society

Senate Committee Commends Tinubu on Launch of National Halal Economy Strategy to Tap $7.7trn Global Market

Published

on

*Senate Committee Commends Tinubu on Launch of National Halal Economy Strategy to Tap $7.7trn Global Market

 

The Senate Committee on Finance has commended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for launching Nigeria’s National Halal Economy Strategy, describing it as a bold and strategic move to position the country within the lucrative global halal market, estimated at $7.7 trillion.

In a statement signed by its Chairman, Senator Sani Musa, the committee praised the initiative as timely and aligned with international best practices. Several countries—including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Brazil, Thailand, and Singapore—have successfully used halal frameworks to boost manufacturing, agricultural exports, financial markets, and foreign investment.

The committee highlighted Nigeria’s strong advantages for success in this space, including its vast agricultural resources, large domestic market, youthful population, growing manufacturing sector, and expanding services industry.

It noted that the strategy fits seamlessly into the Tinubu administration’s broader economic reforms, such as boosting non-oil revenue, diversifying exports, creating jobs, supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and increasing foreign exchange earnings.
President Tinubu, represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima, officially unveiled the strategy on Thursday, February 6, 2026, at the Presidential Villa in Abuja.

The framework, developed in collaboration with Saudi Arabia’s Halal Products Development Company (HPDC) following a bilateral agreement signed in February 2025 at the Makkah Halal Forum, aims to enhance quality standards, certification processes, and competitiveness across sectors like food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, tourism, and ethical finance.

The committee described the strategy as inclusive, market-driven, and globally oriented, while fully respecting Nigeria’s diverse and pluralistic society.

It is projected to contribute significantly to the economy, with estimates suggesting it could add around $1.5 billion to Nigeria’s GDP by 2027 and unlock billions more in domestic value over the coming decade through expanded exports and investment.

Senator Musa pledged full legislative support, oversight, and cooperation to ensure smooth implementation, regulatory clarity, and long-term fiscal sustainability in the national interest.

“This decisive step reinforces Nigeria’s readiness to adopt proven international models, unlock new economic frontiers, and establish itself as a competitive player in the evolving global economy,” the statement concluded.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending