Connect with us

society

If The President Can Pardon Drug Convicts, Then Scrap the NDLEA – Obi of Onitsha’s Stark Challenge to Nigeria’s Anti-Drug Fight

Published

on

If The President Can Pardon Drug Convicts, Then Scrap the NDLEA – Obi of Onitsha’s Stark Challenge to Nigeria’s Anti-Drug Fight.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester, for saharaweeklyng.com

“No point locking thieves or drug barons if mercy crowns the crime” – ROYALTY THUNDERS.

In a searing declaration that strips away politeness and dances unwelcome truths into daylight, the Obi of Onitsha has asked, if the President can pardon 50 (or more) convicted drug offenders, then what is the point of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA)? “No need arresting thieves again,” he thundered. His question is not rhetorical. It cuts to the heart of Nigeria’s anti-narcotics effort, to the foundations of our justice system and to the future of our youth.

What the monarch articulates is more than frustration; it is a systemic alarm. For decades the NDLEA has been one of the few agencies in Nigeria still commanding public respect for confronting the scourge of drug abuse and trafficking. Now, the state’s chief executive, via the exercise of the constitutional prerogative of mercy, has seemingly pulled the rug from under that agency’s message, that crime has consequences.

If The President Can Pardon Drug Convicts, Then Scrap the NDLEA - Obi of Onitsha’s Stark Challenge to Nigeria’s Anti-Drug Fight.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester, for saharaweeklyng.com

This WRITE-UP leaves no stone unturned. We examine the facts, the context, the risk, the voices of reason and the consequences for our nation. With strong language, uncompromising tone and 100% accurate referencing, the case is laid bare.

The Facts: What Has Happened.
On 13 October 2025, it was reported that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu granted clemency to 175 individuals convicted of various offences, including drug trafficking, murder and illegal mining.

Among them was 28 drug traffickers (in one report) out of the total list.

Another report puts drug‐related offenders at about 29% of the total pardoned.

Nigeria’s drug use epidemic is well-documented. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Nigeria survey, 14.4% of Nigerians aged 15–64 (about 14.3 million people) had used psychoactive substances in the previous year. That figure is almost three times the global average of 5.5%.

The NDLEA, under leadership such as that of retired Brig-Gen Buba Marwa, has claimed major successes. Between 2021–2024 about 57,792 arrests were made and almost 10 million kg of hard drugs seized.

Civil-society organisations immediately condemned the pardon. For example:
The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) described the move as “legally questionable, morally wrong and damaging to Nigeria’s image both locally and internationally.”

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) called the pardon of drug traffickers “A NATIONAL DISGRACE” that encourages crime.

In short, while one arm of the state (NDLEA) is aggressively hunting drug offenders, another arm (the Presidency) is releasing them, some in substantial numbers. This creates an incoherent message and a system at risk of collapse.

The Monarch’s Provocative, Yet Inevitable Question.
The Obi of Onitsha (representing traditional authority and moral voice) invoked a brutal logic:
“If the president can pardon drug convicts, then there’s no need for NDLEA. No need arresting thieves or punishing anyone again.”

This is not haphazard rhetoric but a reflection of the cognitive dissonance in Nigeria’s criminal justice architecture. The logic is if the executive has the power to nullify the punitive effect of convictions for serious offences like drug trafficking, then the deterrence imperative is destroyed.

In essence, the monarch is saying, you cannot do one thing and then undo it with the other. You cannot applaud NDLEA for seizures and convictions, then turn around and forgive those very same kinds of offenders. Nigerian youth watch. Law-enforcement officers feel the shift in gravity. Criminal networks take note.

Why This Matters: The Stakes Are High.
A. The Youth Crisis.
More than 14% of adults in Nigeria are documented as having used illicit substances. That means the pool of vulnerable youth is enormous.

When the message is sent that trafficking or abusing drugs can end in a presidential hug, the moral deterrent collapses. Scholar J.A. Olanrewaju writes “The number of drug users in Nigeria is estimated at 14.4%, the report presents clearly the grave negative consequences on health, socio‐economic and security of our nation.”

B. The Credibility of Enforcement.
If NDLEA invests years, manpower and resources to dismantle cartels and convict criminals, but the office of the presidency effectively says “we forgive,” then the incentive structure flips. NDLEA chair Marwa himself warned the agency would pursue traffickers “without fear or favour.” But what value does that pledge hold when the very top of government exercises clemency on similar offenders?

C. International Reputation & Implications.
Nigeria’s partner agencies (UNODC, the US DEA, INTERPOL) observe not only activity, but commitment. When the country loosens the supervisory chain over traffickers via mass pardons, it jeopardises mutual legal assistance, extradition treaties, asset-forfeiture regimes and the country’s rating as a partner in global anti-narcotics efforts. CISLAC stated; “Pardoning individuals convicted for drug trafficking sends the wrong signal to Nigeria’s international partners and undermines the credibility of our justice system.”

D. The Message to Criminals.
As the Obi put it, the signal becomes: “Crime pays, as long as you know the right people.” Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar wrote of the pardon. “The decision not only diminishes the sanctity of justice, but also sends a dangerous signal to the public and the international community about the values this government upholds.”

When criminals believe the worst they face is a few years followed by a presidential pardon, why risk their networks? Why not expand them?

Legal & Constitutional Considerations.
Yes; the presidency is empowered by Section 175 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution to grant the prerogative of mercy.

Though experts argue; this power was designed for selective, exceptional cases, not blanket pardon of categories that undermine national security. According to legal practitioner Joel Ighalo:
“If you are a state prosecutor you must go through the list to see if the President released the person you spent several months, probably years, in court, trying to put away in prison. This is a BASTARDISATION of the prerogative of mercy.”

In other words; the law allows mercy, but not at the cost of system-wide incoherence. The rule of law must not be weaponised or waived at whim.

The Moral Logic: Why the Obi’s Challenge Hits Home.
There is a timeless moral relation between crime, punishment and deterrence. When punishment is certain and proportional, society accepts transgressions less. If punishment becomes negotiable, optional or reversed, deterrence dissolves. The monarch’s rhetorical move (“then scrap NDLEA”) is not literal but metaphorical. He is pointing out that if convictions carry no permanent consequence, then the very architecture of enforcement is hollow.

In his own voice (paraphrased), the monarch reminds us:
“Don’t tell our youths that you are cracking the whip, then pat the offender’s back. Don’t tell the officers to risk their lives busting traffickers, then open the gates for them to walk free. That is hypocrisy. That is betrayal.”

Expert Voices to Strengthen the Argument.
J.A. Olanrewaju et al., in their 2022 study: “A Beautiful Nonsense?”

“The number of drug users in Nigeria is estimated at 14.4% the findings of the survey presented today are striking and alarming and call for concerted efforts to mitigate the negative consequence”

CISLAC statement:
“How do you motivate EFCC, ICPC, NDLEA, CCB or police officers to continue their work when their efforts are undone with a single signature?”

Atiku Abubakar on the pardon:
“At a time when Nigeria continues to reel under the weight of insecurity, moral decay, and a surge in drug‐related of fences the presidency would prioritise clemency for those whose actions have directly undermined national stability and social order.”

A Nation at a Crossroads: A Nation at a Crossroads.
The message from the Obi of Onitsha must resonate far beyond Onitsha. It is a clarion call to rethink whether Nigeria wishes to stand firm or wobble in its war against drugs, corruption and organised crime.

The present state is untenable:
On one hand, NDLEA is doing heavy lifting.

On the other hand, the presidency appears to undercut that lifting with mass pardons.

The youth are watching. Criminals are calculating. Enforcement morale is faltering. The nation’s reputation abroad is threatened.

If indeed the logic of “pardon = no consequences” holds, then yes, the monarch’s dramatic suggestion (“scrap NDLEA”) is not hyperbole. It is a logical conclusion of current policy incoherence.

What must now happen:
A transparent review of the pardon list, especially those convicted of drug trafficking, with a view to restoring credibility.

Clear guidelines on who qualifies for mercy, especially in cases involving national security (drug trafficking, terrorism financing).

Reaffirmation of NDLEA’s mandate, with visible backing from the presidency and political leadership not undermining it.

A sustained public campaign that emphasises accountability, deterrence and justice, so that 14.3 million at-risk Nigerians do not lose faith, and criminals do not gain hope.

As the Obi has rightly observed, the logic cannot be fudged. If the system says “crime will be punished,” then it must mean it. If it says “crime can be pardoned,” then it must accept the consequences, a country adrift, enforcement hollow, youth cynical, criminals emboldened.

Nigeria, you have a choice, reinforce the law, or redefine it. Choose wisely.

 

If The President Can Pardon Drug Convicts, Then Scrap the NDLEA - Obi of Onitsha’s Stark Challenge to Nigeria’s Anti-Drug Fight.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester, for saharaweeklyng.com

society

NOVO Announces Spring 2026 Launch: The World’s First Diamond-Backed Digital Currency and Wealth Platform Devoted to Feeding Africa

Published

on

 

NOVO Announces Spring 2026 Launch: The World’s First Diamond-Backed Digital Currency and Wealth Platform Devoted to Feeding Africa

 

February 2026 — NOVO, an emerging global leader in diamond manufacturing, crypto‑banking, and ethical wealth management, today announced the upcoming Spring 2026 launch of NOVO Coin, the world’s first digital currency fully backed by certified, lab‑grown, cut, and polished diamonds stored in secure vaults in Singapore and Switzerland.

Designed for stability, transparency, and humanitarian impact, NOVO represents a new class of asset‑backed digital currency engineered to serve both global markets and vulnerable economies facing inflation, currency instability, and limited access to banking.

A Currency With a Mission: Feeding a Continent.

In a groundbreaking commitment, NOVO has pledged 50% of all corporate profits to support nonprofit micro‑finance organizations across Africa that specialize in food production, farming, fishing, and sustainable agriculture.

This initiative aims to:

Expand access to affordable capital for small and mid‑scale food producers

Strengthen local food systems and reduce dependency on imports

Dramatically lower grocery prices across African markets

Build long‑term economic resilience for millions of families

NOVO’s leadership believes that empowering Africa’s farmers and food‑producing cooperatives is the fastest path to stabilizing regional economies — and ultimately driving down global food prices.

Diamond‑Backed Stability for a Volatile World
Unlike speculative tokens or inflation‑prone fiat currencies, every NOVO Coin is backed by real, verifiable diamond reserves, manufactured through advanced laboratory processes and held in audited international vaults.

This structure provides:

Intrinsic value tied to a globally recognized commodity

Transparency through third‑party reserve verification

Security via geographically diversified vaults

Long‑term price stability for users and institutional partners

NOVO’s diamond‑reserve system is designed to offer a safe, durable alternative for nations and communities seeking protection from currency devaluation.

A Full‑Spectrum Financial Ecosystem
Beyond the currency itself, NOVO is launching a vertically integrated platform that includes:

Diamond manufacturing and certification

Crypto‑banking and digital asset management

Wealth management and life‑insurance services

Humanitarian micro‑finance distribution channels

This unified ecosystem positions NOVO as one of the first fintech institutions to combine commodity‑backed digital currency with large‑scale social impact.

A New Era of Ethical Finance
“NOVO was built on a simple belief: a currency should serve the people who use it,” said the organization’s founder. “By backing NOVO with diamonds and dedicating half of our profits to African food producers, we are proving that financial innovation and humanitarian responsibility can — and must — coexist.”

Spring 2026: A Global Debut
NOVO Coin will be available to the public in Spring 2026, with early institutional partnerships already underway across Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean.

For more information. Here is the organizations website TOPOFTHEPYRAMID.org

Continue Reading

society

Tinubu Mourns Rear Admiral Musa Katagum: A National Loss for Nigeria’s Military Leadership

Published

on

Tinubu Mourns Rear Admiral Musa Katagum: A National Loss for Nigeria’s Military Leadership

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG 

 

“President Tinubu Pays Tribute as Nigeria’s Naval Command Mourns the Sudden Loss of a Strategic Maritime Leader at a Critical Security Juncture.”

 

Abuja, Nigeria – President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has officially mourned the death of Rear Admiral Musa Bello Katagum, the Chief of Naval Operations of the Nigerian Navy, who died on February 19, 2026, after a protracted illness while receiving treatment abroad. His passing has sent ripples through Nigeria’s defence establishment and national security architecture, marking the loss of one of the most experienced and respected maritime commanders in recent memory.

 

In a statement released on February 20, 2026 by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, President Tinubu described Rear Admiral Katagum’s death as a “significant blow to the military and the nation,” noting the late officer’s vast experience and “invaluable contributions” to both the Nigerian Navy and the broader “Armed Forces of Nigeria”. The President extended heartfelt condolences to the bereaved family, naval personnel and the nation at large, while praying for solace and strength for colleagues and loved ones.

 

Rear Admiral Katagum’s career was marked by distinguished service in several strategic capacities. Before his appointment as Chief of Naval Operations in November 2025, he served as Director of the Presidential Communication, Command and Control Centre (PC4) and Chief of Intelligence of the Nigerian Navy-roles that placed him at the nexus of naval operational planning and intelligence gathering. His leadership was widely credited with enhancing the Navy’s capacity to respond to growing maritime threats in the Gulf of Guinea, including piracy, illegal bunkering, and transnational crime.

 

Security policy experts emphasise that Katagum’s loss comes at a critical juncture for Nigeria. Dr. Adebola Akinpelu, a defence analyst at the Institute for Security Studies, observes that “Nigeria’s maritime domain remains a frontline in the broader security challenges facing the nation; the loss of an adept operational leader like Rear Admiral Katagum is not just a personnel change but a strategic setback.” His insight reflects broader concerns about continuity in military leadership amid intensifying threats.

 

The Nigerian Navy’s own statement, confirmed by the Directorate of Naval Information, affirmed that Katagum’s “exemplary leadership, strategic insight, and unwavering loyalty” were central to boosting operational readiness and national defence. According to Captain Abiodun Folorunsho, the Director of Naval Information, “His legacy remains a source of inspiration across the services.”

 

As Nigeria grapples with complex security landscapes at its land and maritime frontiers, the death of Rear Admiral Katagum underscores a broader national imperative: strengthening institutional capacities while honouring the service and sacrifice of those who defend the nation’s sovereignty. In the words of military scholar Professor James Okoye, “Leadership in security institutions is not easily replaceable; it is built through experience, trust and strategic clarity; qualities that Katagum embodied.”

 

Rear Admiral Musa Katagum has since been laid to rest in accordance with Islamic rites, leaving behind a legacy that will inform Nigerian naval operations for years to come.

Continue Reading

society

Viral “Chat With God” Claim Targeting Kenyan Prophet David Owuor Proven False

Published

on

Viral “Chat With God” Claim Targeting Kenyan Prophet David Owuor Proven False By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Viral “Chat With God” Claim Targeting Kenyan Prophet David Owuor Proven False

By George Omagbemi Sylvester, SaharaWeeklyNG

 

“Viral screenshot sparks national controversy as the Ministry of Repentance and Holiness dismisses fabricated “divine” WhatsApp exchange, raising urgent questions about faith, digital misinformation, and religious accountability in Kenya.”

A sensational social media claim that Kenyan evangelist Prophet Dr. David Owuor displayed a WhatsApp conversation between himself and God has been definitively debunked as misinformation, sparking national debate over digital misinformation, religious authority and faith-based claims in Kenya.

On February 18–19, 2026, an image purporting to show a WhatsApp exchange between a deity and Prophet Owuor circulated widely on Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp groups and TikTok. The screenshot, allegedly shared during one of his sermons, was interpreted by many as illustrating unprecedented direct communication with the divine delivered through a mainstream messaging platform; a claim that, if true, would have broken new ground in how religious revelation is understood in contemporary society.

However, this narrative quickly unraveled. Owuor’s Ministry of Repentance and Holiness issued an unequivocal public statement calling the image “fabricated, baseless and malicious,” emphasizing that he has never communicated with God through WhatsApp and has not displayed any such digital conversation to congregants. The ministry urged the public and believers to disregard and stop sharing the image.

Independent analysis of the screenshot further undermined its credibility: timestamps in the image were internally inconsistent and the so-called exchange contained chronological impossibilities; clear indicators of digital fabrication rather than an authentic conversation.

This hoax coincides with rising scrutiny of Owuor’s ministry. Earlier in February 2026, national broadcaster TV47 aired an investigative report titled “Divine or Deceptive”, which examined alleged “miracle healing” claims associated with Owuor’s crusades, including assertions of curing HIV and other chronic illnesses. Portions of that investigation suggested some medical documentation linked to followers’ health outcomes were fraudulent or misleading, intensifying debate over the intersection of faith and public health.

Credible faith leaders have weighed in on the broader context. Elias Otieno, chairperson of the National Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK), recently urged that “no religious leader should replace God or undermine medicine,” affirming a widely accepted Christian understanding that divine healing does not supplant established medical practice. He warned against unverified miracle claims that may endanger lives if believers forego medical treatment.

Renowned communications scholar Professor Pippa Norris has noted that in digital societies, “religious authority is increasingly contested in the public sphere,” and misinformation (intentional or accidental) can quickly erode trust in both religious and secular institutions. Such dynamics underscore the importance of rigorous fact-checking and responsible communication, especially when claims intersect profoundly with personal belief and public well-being.

In sum, the viral WhatsApp chat narrative was not a revelation from the divine but a striking example of how misinformation can exploit reverence for religious figures. Owuor’s swift repudiation of the false claim and broader commentary from established church bodies, underline the ongoing challenge of balancing deeply personal faith experiences with the evidence-based scrutiny necessary in a digitally connected world.

 

Viral “Chat With God” Claim Targeting Kenyan Prophet David Owuor Proven False
By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending