Business
Import Bans, Empty Boasts and Economic Delusion: Tinubu’s Recipe for Nigeria’s Economic Disaster
Import Bans, Empty Boasts and Economic Delusion: Tinubu’s Recipe for Nigeria’s Economic Disaster
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Sahara Weekly Nigeria
When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared that banning the importation of foreign goods would “revive” Nigeria’s economy, one would think the man had a Nobel Prize in economic policy. Instead, what we get is textbook delusion coming from a self-proclaimed “first-class accountant” from Chicago State University, a claim with no official transcript, certificate or academic record in public view to validate it. In a time when Nigeria urgently needs innovative, export-driven policies, Tinubu is trying to build an economic miracle on import bans, slogans and the illusion of industrial rebirth in a country plagued by power failure, insecurity and corruption.
The Import Ban Illusion
Let’s start with the cold, hard facts. NIGERIA is not an INDUSTRIAL NATION. According to World Bank data (2024), manufacturing contributes less than 9% to Nigeria’s GDP. The country imports over 80% of its essential goods, including food, pharmaceuticals, refined petroleum and machinery. In such a context, banning imports without ensuring local capacity is not “patriotic policy” but economic sabotage.
Tinubu’s administration recently restricted the importation of over 40 items, including rice, cement, toothpicks and even poultry products. His argument? Local production must be encouraged. The problem, however, is that there’s no infrastructure to support that ambition. As of Q1 2025, Nigeria still suffers from epileptic electricity supply, averaging just 4,000 MW for over 200 million people, according to the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. For comparison, South Africa, with a population of 62 million, produces over 45,000 MW (Eskom, 2024 data).
No economy thrives under darkness. You cannot ban the importation of toothpicks and expect bamboo to magically morph into industry without electricity, investment or skilled labor.
Failed Economic Patriotism
The Tinubu administration is recycling the failed policies of past governments. We saw this playbook under former President Muhammadu Buhari, another disciple of economic isolationism. The Central Bank of Nigeria, under Godwin Emefiele, banned 41 items from forex access, yet inflation soared, local substitutes remained expensive and smuggling boomed. The result? Nigeria became the poverty capital of the world in 2018.
Tinubu is repeating that cycle. According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), food inflation stood at 40.53% as of April 2025, with staple items like rice, bread and oil becoming unaffordable for millions. The average Nigerian is now spending over 70% of their income on food—a clear indicator of economic dysfunction.
“The idea that a country can simply ban its way to prosperity is not just misguided; it’s reckless” said Dr. Kingsley Moghalu, former Deputy Governor of the CBN. “You need to create an enabling environment not a restrictive one. Industrialization thrives on productivity not prohibitions.”
A Mouthful of Academic Fraud?
While the economic policy is bad enough, the president’s intellectual credentials are also under serious scrutiny. Tinubu continues to tout his supposed “first-class” status from Chicago State University (CSU). Yet the institution, under subpoena in 2023, confirmed Tinubu did not graduate with honors and discrepancies exist between submitted documents and university records.
As Nigerian lawyer and public affairs analyst Dele Farotimi noted during a Channels TV interview:
“We are being governed by ghosts, people with no verifiable history, no transparency, yet they want to dictate economic truths to over 200 million people.”
How can a man who allegedly forged his way through academic corridors be trusted to engineer genuine economic transformation?
Export, Not Ban: The Real Path to Growth
Rather than banning imports, any serious leader would focus on boosting non-oil exports, supporting SMEs and fixing power, roads and insecurity. For instance, Vietnam (once as poor as Nigeria) embraced export-led growth. According to the International Monetary Fund, Vietnam’s exports in 2023 stood at $371 billion, compared to Nigeria’s paltry $67 billion, 85% of which was crude oil.
In the words of Professor Pat Utomi, political economist and founder of the Centre for Values in Leadership:
“We don’t have a productive economy; we have a transactional economy. Until we invest in human capital, reduce power costs and create policies that invite rather than repel investment, we will keep declining.”
Tinubu’s Propaganda Economics
Let’s also talk about perception. Tinubu’s administration spends more time defending economic disaster than solving it. The presidential spokesman, Bayo Onanuga, recently claimed that the economy is “on track” and that “Nigerians should endure.” This while the naira trades at ₦1,580 to $1 on the official market and youth unemployment hovers at 53.4% (NBS Q1 2025 report).
The government is delusional and more obsessed with optics than outcomes. The average Nigerian doesn’t care about economic jargon. They care about whether they can afford a bag of rice, fuel their car, pay school fees and stay safe.
As Nigerian writer and columnist Gimba Kakanda aptly wrote:
“The tragedy of Nigeria’s leadership is that they see national sacrifice as something the people alone must endure, while they dine on luxury.”
No Vision, No Results
To put it bluntly: Tinubu’s administration is a regime without vision. Import bans are the policies of lazy governments & those without the courage to compete, reform or innovate. These are leaders who cannot think beyond customs tariffs and control levers.
We’ve seen this movie before. In 1984, Buhari as military Head of State implemented similar bans. Nigeria became a nation of smugglers. In 2015, he repeated it. The economy crashed. Now Tinubu is borrowing from that same dusty playbook.
Even in India, a country once famous for import substitution, policymakers have long since abandoned that model in favor of “Make in India” a strategy built on exports, competitiveness and infrastructure.
What Nigeria needs is a Productive Economy and not a prohibited one.
The Final Blow: A Dangerous Gamble
Tinubu’s economic policy is not just wrong but it’s dangerous. Banning imports without providing alternatives is a betrayal of the masses. It punishes consumers, stifles innovation and invites corruption at the borders.
The president wants applause for forcing Nigerians to buy inferior, expensive local goods they don’t want, while politicians and their families still travel abroad for healthcare, holidays and education. What hypocrisy.
Nigeria deserves better. We deserve a leader with real academic credibility, real economic vision and real empathy, not one obsessed with clinging to propaganda while the nation bleeds.
As Chinua Achebe once warned: “The trouble with Nigeria is simply and squarely a FAILURE of LEADERSHIP.”
And Bola Ahmed Tinubu is living proof of that FAILURE…first-class in name only, and utterly bankrupt in strategy.
Business
Group Signs Investment Promotion Agreement in Ivory Coast as UNIPGC Deploys Funding for Capital Projects
Group Signs Investment Promotion Agreement in Ivory Coast as UNIPGC Deploys Funding for Capital Projects
– Ivorycoast, Cot’devouir
Noble & Gold Consulting Ltd has officially signed a partnership agreement with Gicobat Group of Company to facilitate funding for capital projects in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, through the UNIPGC–Global Economic Development Council (GEDC), during a high-level Business and Investment Roundtable held in the country.
The meeting, which took place on May 12, 2026, at the World Trade Centre in Abidjan, brought together senior executives and stakeholders from both organizations, including His Excellency, Amb. Jonathan Ojadah GCOP, Global President of UNIPGC; Mr. Noble Eze, CEO of Noble & Gold Consulting Ltd; and the Chairman of Gicobat Group of Company, Côte d’Ivoire.
The roundtable focused on opportunities for capital project financing, investment promotion, and business development across strategic sectors of the economy. Following extensive deliberations, the parties finalized terms and signed an agreement aimed at advancing the projects discussed during the engagement.
Speaking at the event, the Chairman of the UNIPGC-GEDC, His Excellency Amb. Jonathan Ojadah, delivered a presentation titled *“How Reputable Brands Can Secure Funding for Capital Projects.”* He stated that the agreement represents a major milestone in supporting high-profile business initiatives that require structured financing and professional project management.
According to him, the partnership aligns with UNIPGC-GEDC’s mandate as a leading investment promotion, advisory, and business development institution operating across Africa and internationally.
> “Today, I am delighted to address this important topic on how leaders of established and reputable brands can secure the capital required for major expansion, technological advancement, or infrastructure development. The objective is not merely to find funding, but to attract the right funding at the most competitive cost of capital,” he stated.
He emphasized that brand reputation remains a critical asset in attracting investors and financial institutions.
> “In business, reputation is everything. In the world of capital-intensive projects, reputation is more than public perception; it is an asset class. A reputable brand represents stability, proven performance, and trustworthiness,” he added.
Amb. Ojadah further noted that successful funding processes begin long before formal investment pitches are made. According to him, investors seek organizations that demonstrate value stewardship, operational excellence, and financial discipline.
Drawing from his international experience in capital project engagements across Egypt, Kenya, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, and other countries, he highlighted several categories of major funding institutions involved in large-scale development financing. These include multilateral development banks, government agencies, private foundations, and impact investors focused on infrastructure, healthcare, real estate, energy, oil and gas, and sustainable development.
Among the institutions he referenced were the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the European Union (EU), the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), the OPEC Fund for International Development, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Mastercard Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the UNIPGC Foundation.
He explained that through the UNIPGC Global Economic Development Council (GEDC), the organization facilitates funding opportunities for startups, private sector operators, and government projects through public-private partnerships (PPP), leveraging its network of international funding partners and financial institutions.
Amb. Ojadah identified three critical indicators commonly assessed by investors and lenders before financing projects:
1. **Transparency and Financial Performance** – Organizations must maintain audited financial records, quality assets, and sustainable growth patterns.
2. **Operational Excellence** – Investors prefer businesses with proven operational systems and stable cash flow generation, which reduce investment risks.
3. **A Strong Project Narrative** – Businesses must clearly demonstrate how proposed projects align with long-term strategic goals such as digital transformation, automation, infrastructure expansion, or increased market competitiveness.
He also outlined key strategies reputable brands can adopt in securing project financing, including bank financing, strategic partnerships, vendor financing arrangements, private equity investments, and asset-based lending structures.
> “Securing capital for projects as a reputable brand is ultimately about combining trust with strategic planning. Reputation is your strongest asset, and when paired with sound financial planning and a compelling vision, it becomes a powerful tool for building the future,” he concluded.
For Gicobat Group of Company, the partnership is expected to accelerate the execution of ongoing and proposed projects by leveraging UNIPGC-GEDC’s network of investors and financial partners. Officials of the company expressed confidence that the collaboration would significantly improve project implementation timelines and financing accessibility.
Organizers noted that the choice of the World Trade Centre, Abidjan, as the venue reflected the international scope and significance of the engagement, particularly for negotiations involving capital-intensive projects in infrastructure, trade, and industrial development.
UNIPGC-GEDC describes itself as a leading global investment promotion, advisory, and business development consultancy, working with governments, private enterprises, and institutional investors to structure, finance, and manage large-scale projects from inception to completion.
According to the organization, the Abidjan agreement adds to its expanding portfolio of strategic partnerships aimed at unlocking capital for projects with significant economic and social impact. It also confirmed that due diligence and project structuring processes had been completed prior to the signing to ensure project bankability and investor confidence.
Officials from both organizations further disclosed that implementation teams would be constituted immediately to oversee the next phase of the agreement. Although specific project details were not disclosed, both parties assured stakeholders that updates would be communicated as implementation milestones are achieved.
UNIPGC-GEDC also encouraged businesses, institutions, and investors with high-impact projects requiring financing or management support to engage with its team for collaboration opportunities. Further information on its services is available via UNIPGC-GEDC Official Website www.unipgc.org/gedc
Business
Dennis Ekamah Isn’t Building Houses—He’s Redefining What Home Means for Africans Through PropTech
Dennis Ekamah Isn’t Building Houses—He’s Redefining What Home Means for Africans Through PropTech.
The founder of coHouse.ng is reimagining how millions of Africans access, experience, and share housing through technology.
In Africa’s rapidly evolving innovation landscape, the most transformative companies are no longer defined by the industries they enter, but by the systems they redesign.
For Dennis Ekamah, the opportunity was never about constructing buildings, it was about confronting a deeper question.
why is access to housing still so structurally difficult for millions of Africans in a digital age?
Rather than stepping into real estate as a developer. Dennis chose a different path, positioning coHouse.ng as a PropTech platform rethinking how housing is accessed, experienced, and shared. At the heart of this vision which is connecting potential home owners together via resource pooling for the purpose of either Living or Growth. Simply, *Connect. Live. Grow.*
*A Platform Not a Property Company*
coHouse.ng is not a real estate company. It is a technology-driven ecosystem connecting like-minded individuals into structured communities where they can live intentionally, invest collectively, and grow within a shared system.
From Insight to Recognition
In 2025, coHouse.ng was recognised among the Top 50 Tech Startups in Africa. Even ahead of its official launch, the platform attracted over 1,000 early waitlist users, individuals eager to be part of a new way of living and investing.
Solving for Access, Alignment, and Trust
Dennis Ekamah’s diagnosis goes deeper than supply shortfalls. The real barriers he argues are access, coordination, and trust. coHouse.ng tackles all three through identity verification powered by a third party verification system api. coHouse is not flying solo without the help and collaboration with government bodies across Nigeria and other African countries.
In his words;
“Imagine what you would achieve as an individual or group if you’re living with the right people or like-minded individuals around you.”
I’m not a developer, I’m not a professional realtor, I’m just someone who sees the need for this solution based on the problem we face as youth/young entrepreneurs in today’s housing deficiency across Africa.
— Dennis Ekamah
Join our waitlist by visiting www.cohouse.ng
Business
Landmark Judgment: Federal High Court Dismisses ₦50bn Oil Spill Claim Against ExxonMobil
Landmark Judgment: Federal High Court Dismisses ₦50bn Oil Spill Claim Against ExxonMobil
The Federal High Court sitting in Uyo has dismissed a ₦50 billion lawsuit filed against ExxonMobil, sued as Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited, now Seplat Energy Producing, in a ruling analysts say could significantly reshape oil spill litigation and compensation claims in Nigeria’s petroleum sector.
Delivering judgment on April 29, 2026, Justice Onyetenu held that the suit instituted by the Ejige Ore Njenyisi Muma & Fishing Co-operative Society Ltd was incompetent and liable to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
The plaintiffs had sought ₦50 billion in damages over an alleged hydrocarbon spill said to have occurred on September 12, 2021.
However, counsel to the defendant, Chinonso Ekuma of KENNA LP, successfully argued that the claimants failed to disclose any legally recognisable violation attributable to the oil firm.
In its findings, the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any actionable wrongdoing against the defendant.
A key element in the court’s decision was the Joint Investigation Visit (JIV) Report tendered by the plaintiffs themselves, which showed that the alleged spill incident was confined within ExxonMobil’s operational facility and did not impact the members of the cooperative society or their sources of livelihood.
The court further ruled that claims arising from such incidents must be pursued strictly under the statutory compensation framework provided in Section 11(5) of the Oil Pipelines Act, rather than through common-law claims founded on negligence or nuisance.
Justice Onyetenu held that the plaintiffs’ attempt to circumvent the statutory regime by framing the suit as a tort action rendered the matter incompetent before the court, thereby depriving it of jurisdiction.
Legal analysts say the judgment reinforces the supremacy of the Oil Pipelines Act in determining compensation procedures relating to oil pipeline incidents and environmental claims in Nigeria.
The ruling is also seen as strengthening the evidential weight of Joint Investigation Visit Reports, particularly in cases where such reports indicate no direct impact on claimants or host communities.
Industry observers believe the judgment will have far-reaching implications for future oil spill litigation, especially regarding the procedural requirements for compensation claims against oil operators.
The court’s decision further provides clarity for operators within Nigeria’s energy sector by reaffirming that compliance with Section 11(5) of the Oil Pipelines Act is mandatory and cannot be sidestepped through alternative legal formulations.
While K.O. Uzuokwu appeared for the plaintiffs, the defence was led by Chinonso Ekuma of KENNA LP on behalf of ExxonMobil.
-
news5 months agoWHO REALLY OWNS MONIEPOINT? The $290 Million Deal That Sold Nigeria’s Top Fintech to Foreign Interests
-
society1 week agoSOCIAL MEDIA IS NOT A BATTLEFIELD COMMAND – WHY THE NIGERIAN ARMY’S ACTION AGAINST JUSTICE CRACK IS A NATIONAL SECURITY IMPERATIVE
-
celebrity radar - gossips4 months agoDr. Chris Okafor Returns with Power and Fire of the Spirit -Mounts Grace Nation Altar with Fresh Anointing and Restoration Grace on February 1, 2026
-
celebrity radar - gossips5 months agoProphet Kingsley Aitafo Releases 2026 Prophecy: ‘Nigeria Will Rise, but the World Must Prepare for Turbulence’





