Connect with us

society

IN THE FACE OF MOUNTING THREATS TO JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, COURT OF APPEAL VERDICT IS A HOLLOW RITE OF PASSAGE

Published

on

Access to Justice Media Advisory

Introduction

On May 10th 2019, the Court of Appeal struck out appeals against the ex-parte Orders of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (“Tribunal”) suspending (former) Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen from office.President Muhammadu Buhari had, on the strength of the Order of the Tribunal suspended Justice Onnoghen from office as Chief Justice of Nigeria and appointed Hon. Justice Tanko Mohammed as acting Chief Justice of Nigeria. 

In the unanimous judgment of the Court of Appeal (Coram:Justice Stephen Adah, Justice Tinuade Akinmolade-Wilson and Justice Peter Ige), the Court dismissed three of the four appeals of Justice Onnoghen on the grounds that the substantive matters from which they arose had been concluded as the Code of Conduct Tribunal had convicted Justice Walter Onnoghen of the allegations against him already on April 18th 2019. The fourth appeal was struck out for lack of competence. 

The Court of Appeal however found that the ex parte order granted by the Tribunal on 23rd January 2019 had breached Justice Onnoghen’s right to fair hearing becausethe order was obtained in a manner “shrouded in secrecy and clandestine maneuvre”. The verdict of the Court of Appeal comes three months after the panel reserved judgment on the appeals filed by Justice Walter Onnoghenin connection with his trial before the Code of Conduct Tribunal. 

Had the decision of the Court of Appeal been delivered sooner, at a time when it could have mattered, it would have represented a timely intervention required, at that time, to meet the exigencies of the situation in the Tribunal; it could have halted the travesty and charade that was being played out by the Code of Conduct Tribunal, under the guise of a trial. Today, the judgment of the Court of Appeal faulting the obnoxious ex-parte Order suspending Justice Onnoghen, as well as denouncing the Tribunal’s disregard of the Orders issued against it by other courts halting its proceedings, has little else to it besides academic value. The judgements, are, therefore, not much other than hollow rites of passage. The Court of Appeal’s moralizations on the conduct of the Code of Conduct Tribunal at this time, therefore, are of too little value because they were too late. Though the Court of Appeal has reasoned that the appeal by Justice Onnoghen has been rendered moot given the conclusion of proceedings against him by the Tribunal, it was not as much the appeal as it was the Appellate Court that had rendered itself moot, out of reckoning, out of service and out of reach. 

The decision of the Court of Appeal to reserve its judgments for such length of time that saw theproceedings of the Code of Conduct Tribunal wind up is unfortunate. Whatever the Court of Appeal’s views were on the conduct of Justice Walter Onnoghen, what was at stake was well beyond the scope of Justice Onnoghen’scircumstance. What is at stake is the ideology of the court’s role in preserving constitutional democracy and the rights of citizens. That role is clearly much broader, and deeper than the complexion of a single case. It implicates the rights of ordinary citizens who have to seek the court’s intervention in preventing some irreparable harm to them. The courts have often said that they are the last bastions of hope for citizens, the guardians of the Constitution, the wedge that stands between oppression and liberty. The example set by the Court of Appeal in Justice Onnoghen’scase is diametrically different to the role and duty courts have, and the expectations citizens have of the courts.

As things stand today, the judiciary is laboring under serious threats to its independence, coming mostly from the executive arm of government, both at the centre and in the States, witnessed by what has been going on in the Kogi State Judiciary in the case of the latter. This ought to be a time when courts would rise up, and defend Nigeria’s hard-won constitutional democracy with valour and defiance. But our courts are drawing a blank, and making citizens fear for their ability and readiness to protect them and the rule of law in a country beset by so many problems of governance. If tyranny persists in Nigeria, it is because courts are, in the main, failing the Nigerian people.

Joseph Otteh​​​​​Daniel AloayeIgiekhumhe

Convener ​​​​​Programme Officer

society

A Renewed Momentum: How the Chief of Army Staff is Repositioning the Nigerian Army for Decisive Impact

Published

on

*A Renewed Momentum: How the Chief of Army Staff is Repositioning the Nigerian Army for Decisive Impact*

By Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi.

 

 

In times of prolonged security challenges, it is easy—almost convenient—for critics to amplify setbacks while ignoring measurable progress. Yet, across Nigeria’s diverse and complex theatres of operation, a different story is steadily unfolding: one of resilience, tactical evolution, and renewed operational effectiveness under the leadership of the Chief of Army Staff, (COAS, Nigerian Army), Lt General Waidi Shaibu.

 

What we are witnessing today is not a media hype or propaganda—it is the outcome of deliberate reforms, improved coordination, and a reinvigorated fighting spirit within the Nigerian Army.

 

*A Clear Shift in Operational Effectiveness*

 

Recent developments across, but not limited to Benue, Plateau, Borno, Yobe, Sokoto, Zamfara, Kogi, Kwara, Edo, and the South-East underscore a critical truth: the Nigerian Army under General Waidi Shaibu is not on the back foot. On the contrary, it is increasingly proactive, intelligence-driven, and responsive.

 

From the successful rescue of kidnapped civilians in Benue, to the interception of armed militias in Plateau, and the neutralisation of insurgents in Borno, the pattern is consistent—swift response, precision engagement, and tangible outcomes.

 

These are not isolated victories. They reflect:

 

– Improved intelligence gathering and utilisation.

 

– Faster troop deployment and mobility.

 

– Enhanced inter-agency collaboration.

 

– Better morale and combat readiness among personnel.

 

Such coordination, especially in asymmetric warfare, does not happen by chance. It is a direct reflection of leadership at the top.

 

*The Chief of Army Staff: Lt General Waidi Shaibu Driving Reform and Results*

 

Since assuming office, the Chief of Army Staff, Lt General Waidi Shaibu has brought a renewed sense of urgency and clarity of purpose to military operations. His leadership style appears anchored on three critical pillars:

 

*1. Operational Aggression with Discipline*

 

Troops are no longer merely reacting—they are taking the fight to criminal elements. Whether dismantling terrorist camps in the North Central states or repelling coordinated attacks in the North-East, or engaging the Unknown Gunmen in the SouthEast, the Nigerian Army is demonstrating initiative and dominance.

 

*2. Intelligence-Led Warfare*

 

Modern conflicts are won as much with information as with firepower. The increasing success in intercepting logistics suppliers, uncovering IEDs, and preempting attacks shows a system that is becoming smarter, not just stronger.

 

*3. Joint Force Synergy*

 

The collaboration between the Army, Air Force, Navy, Police, DSS, and local security groups has significantly improved. Operations in the South Eastern part of the Country and other regions highlight a unified national security architecture—something that has long been advocated but is now visibly taking shape.

 

*Addressing the Culture of Criticism*

 

It must be said plainly: criticism is not inherently wrong in a democracy. However, what is deeply problematic is the pattern of uninformed, selective outrage that ignores context, dismisses progress, and undermines morale.

 

Those who hastily label every security incident as evidence of failure often:

 

– Ignore the complexity of asymmetric warfare.

 

– Overlook the sacrifices of frontline personnel.

 

– Fail to acknowledge the vast geographical and logistical challenges involved.

 

Worse still, some narratives are built on speculation, ethnic bias, or incomplete information—such as prematurely attributing crimes to specific groups without verification.

 

This does not help the nation. It weakens it.

 

*The Reality of the Battlefield*

 

Nigeria is not facing a conventional war. The threats are:

 

– Decentralised.

 

– Embedded within local communities.

 

– Adaptive and unpredictable.

 

From insurgents and bandits to kidnappers and economic saboteurs, the battlefield is fluid. Success, therefore, must be measured not by the absence of incidents, but by the capacity to respond, contain, and degrade threats over time.

 

By this standard, the Nigerian Army is making undeniable progress.

 

*The Human Element: Courage and Sacrifice*

 

Behind every operation report is a human story—soldiers who leave their families behind, who endure harsh terrains, who confront danger daily so that millions of Nigerians can live in relative safety.

 

Some pay the ultimate price.

 

To reduce their efforts to mere statistics or dismiss them outright is not just unfair—it is unjust.

 

*A Call for National Support*

 

The progress being recorded today must be sustained, and that requires more than military effort. It demands:

 

– Public cooperation with security agencies.

 

– Responsible media reporting.

 

– Community vigilance against criminal infiltration

 

– Constructive, informed criticism where necessary.

 

Most importantly, it requires national unity in purpose.

 

*Conclusion: A Force Worthy of Confidence*

 

The Nigerian Army, under the leadership of the Chief of Army Staff, Lt General Waidi Shaibu is demonstrating that with the right direction, commitment, and strategy, meaningful progress is possible—even in the face of complex security challenges.

 

The gains may not always make screaming headlines, but they are real. They are measurable. And they are building momentum.

 

Rather than constant condemnation, what the Armed Forces deserve at this critical time is recognition, encouragement, and unwavering support.

 

Because beyond the noise of criticism lies a simple truth:

these men and women are standing between order and chaos—and they are holding the line.

 

This article was written by Comrade Oladimeji Odeyemi, an entrepreneur and an opinion moulder from Ibadan, Oyo State.

Continue Reading

society

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY

Published

on

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY

By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)

 

LAGOS — A recent publication by Sahara Reporters alleging systemic corruption, the creation of “mushroom units,” inflated budgets, and operational sabotage within the Nigerian Army has sparked concern across security and public circles.

RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY

By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)

But a retired senior officer, Brigadier General D.G. James, has pushed back strongly, describing the claims as unsubstantiated, misleading, and damaging to the integrity of an institution that has borne the brunt of Nigeria’s internal security battles for over a decade.

 

Having served for 30 years across the North-East, North-West, and Niger Delta, the retired general said his intervention is not in defence of any individual, but of the institution itself.

 

Questioning Anonymous Claims

At the heart of the controversial report is a single unnamed source described as a “top military strategist.” General James argues that such anonymity, without corroborating evidence, weakens the credibility of the allegations.

“Serious claims about budgets, personnel, and logistics must be backed by verifiable documents, not vague assertions,” he said, challenging the publication to provide concrete proof, including records or sworn statements.

“Mushroom Units” or Operational Necessity?

The report’s claim that under-strength units were created to inflate budgets was also dismissed as a misunderstanding of modern counter-insurgency operations.

 

According to the retired officer, Nigeria’s evolving security threats — from Boko Haram and ISWAP in the North-East to banditry in the North-West and separatist tensions in the South-East, have necessitated the creation of flexible task forces and new formations.

 

“Operating below full strength is not evidence of corruption,” he said. “It reflects battlefield realities , casualties, redeployments, and expansion under pressure.”

 

Payroll and Logistics Allegations

On claims of double-counting personnel for financial gain, General James described the scenario as “logistically implausible,” citing centralized payroll systems tied to biometric verification.

He further noted that accusations of fuel diversion ignore broader structural issues within Nigeria’s budgeting system.

“Funds approved on paper are often not fully released. By the time allocations reach operational units, commanders are forced to manage limited resources,” he explained.

Reaction to Benisheik Reference

General James also condemned the report’s reference to the death of Brigadier General Oseni Braimah during an ISWAP attack in Benisheik, calling it an inappropriate attempt to link battlefield losses to alleged corruption.

“Using the death of a fallen officer to support unverified claims is deeply disrespectful,” he said.

Broader Accountability

While not dismissing the possibility of corruption in defence spending, the retired general emphasized that responsibility cannot be placed solely on the military.
He pointed to the role of the National Assembly in budget approvals and civilian institutions in oversight and prosecution.

“If there are flaws in the system, they are systemic , not exclusive to the armed forces,” he noted.

 

Call for Transparent Investigation

General James called for a thorough and independent investigation into the allegations, urging authorities to rely on verifiable evidence rather than media narratives.

“Let every claim be examined , but fairly, transparently, and without prejudice,” he said.

 

Reaffirming his lifelong loyalty to the military, the retired officer urged Nigerians to approach such reports with caution.
“Our soldiers have made enormous sacrifices in defence of this country. Allegations alone should not overshadow those realities,” he stated.

Continue Reading

society

IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity

Published

on

IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity

 

The Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Rilwan Disu, on Wednesday closed a Squadron Commanders’ Training Programme at the Police Mobile Force (PMF) Training College in Ende-Hills, Nasarawa State, vowing to strengthen leadership and operational effectiveness across the force.

At the ceremony, the IGP inspected training facilities including the simulation ground and shooting range, where he personally took part in tactical exercises. He told cadets of the Nigeria Police Academy undergoing training at the college to remain disciplined and focused, stressing that their effectiveness on the field would depend on the quality of their training.

“Resilience, professionalism, and strict adherence to human rights principles must guide your conduct,” Disu said.

Addressing the graduating squadron commanders, he urged them to apply their newly acquired skills in leadership, operational discipline, and tactical efficiency. He described the PMF as a “highly disciplined, responsive, and reliable tactical arm” of the Nigeria Police Force.

The IGP further reaffirmed his commitment to improving officers’ welfare and boosting operational capacity, assuring that formations would be adequately equipped to tackle evolving security challenges nationwide.

 

IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending