A Hollow Order of Injustice: How Wike’s Court Ruling Becomes Tinubu’s Weapon Against Democracy.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Sahara Weekly

When the judiciary bends, democracy breaks; Nigeria must resist this orchestrated assault on justice.

Introduction: The Court as a Weapon, Not a Sanctuary.

In a country where the judiciary should serve as the last hope of the common man, Nigeria has tragically descended into a terrain where the gavel has been hijacked by political gladiators. The latest ruling (widely seen as a hollow order) emanating from a judge loyal to Nyesom Wike, has revealed once again how President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) are using the courts as instruments of destabilization rather than bastions of justice.

This is not merely a legal misstep; it is a calculated attempt to cripple democracy in Nigeria. When courts become pawns in the political chessboard, democracy does not just weaken, it collapses under the weight of judicial compromise.

Wike’s Shadow Over the Bench.
Nyesom Wike, a political strongman with a well-documented history of coercion and manipulation, now casts a long shadow over the judiciary. Since his emergence as Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), his influence has been systematically extended into the judiciary, where certain judges appear to dance to his drumbeats.

Legal experts have pointed out that the order in question carries the hallmarks of political interference. According to Professor Itse Sagay, a respected constitutional lawyer, “When judicial orders begin to align suspiciously with political interests, one must question whether the courts are still guided by law or by unseen puppeteers.”

This so-called ruling is less about law and more about consolidating power for Tinubu’s APC, with Wike serving as the enforcer of the new political order.

The Judiciary in Chains.
Nigeria’s judiciary has historically faced accusations of compromise, but the present climate is dangerously unprecedented. A 2024 report by Transparency International placed Nigeria among the top 30 countries where judicial corruption is “systemic and politically motivated.”

Instead of functioning as impartial interpreters of the constitution, judges are increasingly being deployed to deliver predetermined outcomes. The hollow order from Wike’s judge is a glaring example of this trend.

The late Justice Chukwudifu Oputa once said, “A judge who has sold his conscience for political reward is worse than an armed robber, for he robs not just one man, but the entire nation of justice.” Today, those words echo like a warning bell across Nigeria’s fragile democracy.

Tinubu’s Playbook: Undermine to Dominate.
President Tinubu’s administration has consistently relied on a pattern: weaken institutions, manipulate the judiciary, and control narratives. During the 2023 elections, multiple cases were dismissed or decided in ways that raised eyebrows among observers. Amnesty International and the European Union Election Observation Mission both flagged “judicial complicity” in electoral disputes.

The hollow order is not isolated, it is part of Tinubu’s broader playbook. By destabilizing legal processes, the APC ensures that opposition voices are weakened, dissenting platforms are strangled and democracy is reduced to an empty slogan.

As Chinua Achebe warned in The Trouble with Nigeria, “The problem is unwillingness or inability of its leaders to rise to the responsibility, to the challenge of personal example, which is the hallmark of true leadership.” Tinubu’s reliance on judicial manipulation demonstrates precisely this unwillingness.

Democracy Under Siege.
The danger of this trend cannot be overstated. Democracy thrives on separation of powers; executive, legislature and judiciary acting independently. Once the judiciary becomes a tool of the executive, dictatorship is born under democratic disguise.

Political analyst Dr. Hakeem Baba-Ahmed notes, “The greatest danger to Nigeria today is not even corruption or insecurity, but the collapse of institutions meant to protect us from bad governance. The judiciary is top of that list.”

The hollow order from Wike’s judge is not a legal pronouncement; it is a political strategy. It is designed to silence opposition, intimidate civil society and normalize executive overreach. If this trend persists, Nigerians will wake up one day to realize that democracy was overthrown, not by soldiers in uniform, but by judges in robes.

Facts Behind the Hollow Order.
Let us be clear: NO SERIOUS LEGAL FOUNDATION EXISTS FOR THIS RULING. Analysts have described it as vague, contradictory and unenforceable in any constitutional democracy. The order lacks jurisprudential depth and fails the basic test of legal reasoning.

Fact-checking the order reveals:
Constitutional Contradictions ~ Several provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) clearly nullify the premises of the order.

Absence of Precedent ~ No judicial precedent supports the decision, suggesting it was crafted for political convenience rather than legal clarity.

Conflict of Interest ~ The judge’s known proximity to Wike raises ethical questions about impartiality, contravening the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct.

Thus, describing it as hollow is not hyperbole; it is a fact.

Scholars and Experts Weigh In.
Respected voices across law, governance and civil society have condemned the trend.

Professor Akin Oyebode, international law scholar: “When courts become marketplaces for political bargains, justice dies. Nigeria is approaching that dangerous precipice.”

Dr. Jibrin Ibrahim, political scientist: “The judiciary has become the last nail in the coffin of Nigeria’s democracy. Unless Nigerians resist, the APC will use the courts to legitimize tyranny.”

Nelson Mandela, though speaking decades ago, provides timeless wisdom: “Our freedom is incomplete without the rule of law.” Nigeria’s current reality proves Mandela right – without law, freedom is fiction.

The International Dimension.
The world is watching. The hollow order has already triggered concerns among international observers. The U.S. State Department, in its 2024 Nigeria Human Rights Report, warned about “judicial partiality and undue political interference.”

If Nigeria continues on this trajectory, it risks isolation. Investors will flee, fearing instability. Civil liberties will shrink. And Nigeria, Africa’s largest democracy by population, may slide into the ignominy of authoritarianism.

The People’s Mandate: Resist Judicial Capture.
At this critical juncture, Nigerians must refuse to accept hollow orders as legitimate. Civil society must intensify pressure, the Bar Association must defend its oath and ordinary citizens must raise their voices. Silence is complicity.

As Martin Luther King Jr. declared, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Allowing APC and Tinubu to weaponize the judiciary endangers not just political opponents but every Nigerian seeking justice tomorrow.

A Call to Action.
The judiciary must be reclaimed from political hijackers. Reform is urgent:

Judicial Independence: Appointment processes must be insulated from political manipulation.

Accountability: Judges complicit in political rulings must face disciplinary and legal sanctions.

Civil Resistance: Nigerians must demand that the courts serve people not politicians.

The hollow order should be remembered as a turning point – where citizens decided that enough was enough.

Final Word.
Nigeria’s democracy is bleeding and the latest ruling is a dagger in its heart. Wike’s influence and Tinubu’s manipulation have combined to transform the judiciary into a weapon of oppression. But history teaches us that hollow orders cannot stand against a determined people.

The court may have spoken, but its words ring hollow. The people must now speak louder.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Sahara Weekly

Jonathan’s 2027 Ambition Splits South-South PDP as Party Leaders Weigh In

Abuja, Nigeria – Speculation over the reported 2027 presidential ambition of former President Goodluck Jonathan has triggered fresh divisions within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the South-South, with party leaders and stakeholders split over whether the former leader should return to the ballot.

While some argue Jonathan should not contest against incumbent President Bola Tinubu, several political pressure groups and PDP factions have rallied behind him, describing his possible comeback as a “breath of fresh air.”

Sources close to the former president confirmed he is still consulting widely before deciding whether to contest. He has reportedly received overtures not only from the PDP, but also from the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) and the African Democratic Congress (ADC) urging him to run in 2027.

South-South PDP Divided

In Bayelsa State, Jonathan’s home base, all eyes are on Governor Douye Diri, whose stance will likely shape the chapter’s position. The uncertainty has also deepened rivalries in Rivers State, where loyalists of FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara have taken opposite positions—Wike’s camp rejecting Jonathan’s return, while Fubara’s allies welcome it.

In contrast, the Edo State PDP has openly endorsed the idea. Party Publicity Secretary Chris Nehikhare described Jonathan as “one of the most qualified leaders in Nigeria’s history,” adding that his possible return would be “a refreshing development and a privilege for the party to champion.”

Similarly, Delta State leaders have pledged support, while the Akwa Ibom chapter says it is awaiting Jonathan’s formal declaration before stating its position.

National Push for Jonathan

Beyond the South-South, efforts to draw Jonathan back into the PDP are gathering momentum. Governor Bala Mohammed of Bauchi State, who chairs the PDP Governors’ Forum, recently met with Jonathan in Bayelsa to discuss his potential candidacy.

Prominent party elders—including former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido and former Minister of Information Jerry Gana—have also publicly urged him to return and contest under the PDP platform.

Constitutional Debate

The possibility of Jonathan’s candidacy has reignited debate about his eligibility. A 2018 constitutional amendment bars anyone sworn in twice as president or governor from seeking re-election. Sections 137(3) and 182(3) specify that a person who completed another’s term may only seek one additional full term.

Critics argue this disqualifies Jonathan, who first assumed office in 2010 after the death of President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua before winning his own mandate in 2011. However, Jonathan’s camp insists he is eligible, citing a 2022 Federal High Court judgment in Yenagoa that affirmed his right to run again.

Rivers PDP at Crossroads

In Rivers, divisions are sharpest. PDP spokesman Kenneth Yorwika, a Wike loyalist, dismissed Jonathan’s relevance, noting his long absence from party affairs and arguing that Tinubu is already “making determined efforts to improve the lives of Nigerians.”

By contrast, allies of Fubara see Jonathan as a unifying figure. Former federal lawmaker Ogbonna Nwuke praised the ex-president’s peaceful disposition and performance in office, saying many Nigerians believe he has the qualities to restore stability and provide the leadership the country now needs.

Waiting Game in Bayelsa

For now, the Bayelsa PDP remains officially neutral. Acting caretaker chairman George Turnah stressed that only Governor Diri, as state leader of the party, can speak authoritatively.

“The story of President Jonathan’s ambition remains in the realm of speculation. Until he formally declares, it is premature for us to take a position,” Turnah said.

The Road Ahead

As consultations continue, Jonathan’s name looms large over the PDP’s internal calculations. Supporters hail him as a stabilizing figure whose tenure is still remembered for national cohesion and peaceful leadership, while critics question his relevance and eligibility.

What remains clear is that the former president’s next move—whether to declare or step aside—could reshape not only the PDP’s 2027 strategy but also the trajectory of Nigeria’s wider political landscape.

‎Tinubu/Shettima Ticket: Northern Christian Forum Thanks President Tinubu For Acknowledging Vice President’s Loyalty Ahead Of 2027

‎
‎The Northern Christian Youth Forum [NCYF] led by Rev. Pinot Atuluku as President, has thanked President Bola Tinubu for acknowledging Vice President Kassim Shetima’s loyalty. The group thereby vowed that it will mobilise 20 million Northern Christian votes for Mr. President ahead of 2027.
‎
‎NCYF members said they are happy that Kashim Shettima, the most senior political leader from the north has carried everyone along irrespective of religion.
‎
‎They acknowledged his roles in promoting peace and harmony within the north using diverse strategic interventions towards making sure that Christians are carried along.
‎
‎You will recall that Mr. President recently commented on Vice President Kashim Shettima’s loyalty and why people are envious.
‎
‎You will also recall that some groups have been asking him to drop Shettima ahead of 2027. It has now been confirmed that the President will not drop him either.
‎
‎
‎
‎
‎
‎