Connect with us

news

One love foundation, Orhue sue FG to Ecowas Court over police Illegality, Seeks Damages of $500

Published

on

One love foundation, Orhue sue FG to Ecowas Court over police Illegality, Seeks Damages of $500

One love foundation, Orhue sue FG to Ecowas Court over police Illegality, Seeks Damages of $500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Elvis Omoregie

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sahara Weekly Reports That The Foremost human rights organisation, one love foundation has once again alongside a 2020 #EndSARS panel member of Edo state, miss Precious Orhue have dragged the Federal Government of Nigeria FG, to the Ecowas court to checkmate and restrain the police from any other further victimization and operating check pionts/illegal road blocks in Nigeria till there are enough guarantee by FG at All roads in Nigeria.

 

 

 

 

 

One love foundation, Orhue sue FG to Ecowas Court over police Illegality, Seeks Damages of $500

 

 

 

 

In a suit made available to press and lodged before the Ecowas court on 30th december 2022, they are seeking for a lot of reliefs and praying the Ecowas court to award members of their organisation and further reparation in damages in the sum of $500,000 only, to everyone so far victimized on Nigeria  roads by the Nigeria police.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

recall, sometime ago in a viral video making the rounds on social media, a certain precious Orhue, a member of the 2020 Edo state #EndSARS panel on police brutality , was seen  recording in a viral video, reprimanding the police patrol team of Mabushi police station under the FCT Nigeria police command, to refrain from acts of illegal checking of her car spare tyres, pigeon holes and other issues not convered and not defined as functions of police under the Nigeria  police act 2021.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the said  viral video, the police patrol team of Mabushi police station of the Nigeria police force was seen threatening to shoot, assault and maim precious Orhue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Furthermore the DPO of FCT  Mabushi police station of in concert with the DPO of FCT Mabushi police station, and a certain supretendent of police SP Busari all jointly of Nigeria police force, in a very questionable manner and in a non existing allegations of obstructing police officers, offering police officers bribe, and other allegations, then on the 11th august 2022, charged miss precious Orhue to the FCT area court on all the above sundry offences,which court has no jurisdiction in that regard, in other to victimized her for her advocacy and  speaking out.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From eye witness report, this act by the FCT DPO of Mabushi police station then of Nigeria police force was done as cover up for the viral video, where the  police officers of Mabushi police station under the Nigeria police force ,just for them  to cover up for there crimes and violations of the fundamental human  rights of precious Orhue Court proceedings as monitored by concerned civil society members, activist, have it that, Miss Precious Orhue, legally  represented in FCT area court by Abuja based human rights lawyer, Samuel Ihensekhien Jnr, was granted bail on very liberal terms and the charges later terminated and Precious Orhue acquitted by the FCT area court in a later proceedings on 15th December 2022.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speaking further then on this, Precious Orhue who narrated what happened in the said viral video, stated that after she refused to debunk and post another telephone recorded  video to water down the effects of the viral video of the Mabushi police patrol team  of Nigeria police force assaults on her, the then DPO of Mabushi police station, one Csp Abdulmumuni Musa Abubakar and supretendent Busari with some other  police officers  in vengeance/retaliations of the viral phone video recording by precious Orhue, stating the  condemnable acts of police officers, actually charged her to the FCT area court in this regard. She urged Nigerians to keep reporting acts of brutality by police officers , despite the negative  circumstances that always follow same.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speaking on the above case, human rights activist , Chief, Dr Patrick Eholor who was present in court, noted that the Nigeria police force and their officers have not learn there lessons, that police brutality cannot survive with the awareness of Nigerians on their core fundamental rights. And that the case filed at Ecowas court is to seek for reparation and checkmate extortionist move by security agencies and the police on Nigeria highway and on the road. He also said by filing this case at Ecowas court, same is to seek interpretation by Ecowas court, whether road blocks itself is not illegal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Patrick Eholor also said that under the Nigeria law of Taxes and Levies Act, Laws of Federation of Nigeria 2004 Section 2 (2) disallows any person, including respondent police officers and agents from mounting a road block in any part of the federation for the purposes of collecting any tax / levy or extortions, so he then wonders why security personnel exhorts innocent Nigerians and hapless citizens on Nigeria roads, including periodic violations of every Nigeria rights, who wears dreadlocks, tattoos, expenssive hair cuts, and hence by this suit lodged at Ecowas court, a stop will be put to all the above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A glimpse of the suit filed above, have the following reliefs:1. A DECLARATION that arrest of the Applicant by the armed agents of the Respondent at Fct- Abuja  for non criminal offence on 10th august to 11 august 2022 is illegal as it violates the human right of the Applicant to the dignity of the human person guaranteed by Article 5 of the African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights and Articles 4 and 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.A DECLARATION that the violation of all the recognized fundamental human rights of the 1st and 2nd applicants as summarized in this case is illegal as it violate the presumption of innocence guaranteed by Articles 7 (1) (b) and (2) of the African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights and Articles 7 and 8  of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.AA DECLARATION that the acts of the 1st and 2nd applicants in respect of all violations of this 1st and 2nd applicants right is illegal and injurious to lack of the dignity of the human person guaranteed by Article 5 of the African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights and Articles 4 and 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.A DECLARATION that the arrest and detention of the 1st Applicant by the armed agents of the Respondent without access to his Attorney from 10th august 2022 to 11th august 2022 is illegal as it violates the human right of the Applicant to legal representation guaranteed by Article 5 of the African Charter of Human and Peoples Rights and Articles 4 and 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.A DECLARATION of this court for the stopping to halt, banning and proscription of all road blocks by the respondent police officers and agents, which is not subject of any criminal investigation activities as same constitutes violation of the right to freedom of movements of the 1st to 2nd applicants and all citizens of Nigeria and members of the 3rd applicants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.AN ORDER of this Honourable Court directing the Respondent to pay over to the  1st and 2nd Applicant the sum of $500, 000. 00 (Five Hundred Thousand Dollars) only as aggravated and general damages for the violation of 2nd and  1st Applicant’s and 3rd members  right to liberty, freedom of movement, private and family life, dignity of person, health, legal representation by the armed agents of the Respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.AN ORDER of this Honourable Court directing the Respondent  to pay over to the 1st and  2nd Applicant the sum of $1000. 00 (One Thousand Dollars)   only as cost of prosecuting this suit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS this Community Court of Justice might make in the circumstance of this case.As at presstime on 30th December 2022, this suit filed and lodged before the ecowas court,abuja filed  alongside a fast track application for interim reliefs, has not been given a date for hearing and determination. We hope to keep members of public posted.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

news

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

Published

on

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

 

Former Chief of Army Staff and Nigeria’s immediate past Ambassador to the Republic of Benin, Lt. Gen. (Rtd) Tukur Yusuf Buratai, has paid a glowing tribute to his predecessor, Lt. Gen. OA Ihejirika, as the retired General marks his 70th birthday.

 

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

In a heartfelt message released in Abuja on Friday, Buratai described Ihejirika as not only a distinguished soldier and statesman, but also a commander, mentor, and “architect of leadership” whose influence shaped a generation of senior military officers.

 

Buratai recalled that his professional rise within the Nigerian Army was significantly moulded under Ihejirika’s command, citing key appointments that defined his career trajectory.

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

 

According to him, the trust reposed in him through early command responsibilities, including his first command posting at Headquarters 2 Brigade and later as Commandant of the Nigerian Army School of Infantry, laid a solid foundation for his future leadership roles.

 

“These opportunities were not mere appointments; they were strategic investments in leadership,” Buratai noted, adding that such exposure prepared him for higher national responsibilities.

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

He further acknowledged that the mentorship and professional grounding he received under Ihejirika’s leadership were instrumental in his eventual appointment as Chief of Army Staff and later as Nigeria’s Ambassador to the Republic of Benin.

 

Buratai praised Ihejirika’s command philosophy, describing it as professional, pragmatic, and mission-driven. He said the former Army Chief led by example, combining firm strategic direction with a clear blueprint for excellence that continues to influence military leadership practices.

Buratai Pays Tribute to Ihejirika at 70, Hails Mentorship and Legacy of Leadership

 

“At seventy, General Ihejirika has earned the right to reflect on a legacy secured,” Buratai stated, praying for good health, peace, and enduring joy for the retired General as he enters a new decade.

 

He concluded by expressing profound gratitude for the leadership, mentorship, and lasting example provided by Ihejirika over the years.

 

The tribute was signed by Lt. Gen. Tukur Yusuf Buratai, who described himself as a grateful mentee and successor, underscoring the enduring bonds of mentorship within the Nigerian Army’s top leadership.

Continue Reading

news

Sagamu Plantation Row: Igimisoje-Anoko Family Challenges LG Claim

Published

on

The Odumena Igimisoje-Anoko family of Orile-Ofin in Sagamu Local Government Area of Ogun State has strongly disputed claims by the Sagamu Local Government that a large expanse of land near the Sagamu–Ikenne Road belongs to the state government, insisting that the property remains ancestral land belonging to their forefathers.
The family’s reaction follows a public warning issued by the Chairman of Sagamu Local Government, Ogbeni Jubril Olasile Odulate, cautioning residents against purchasing or occupying portions of what he described as a “state-owned rubber plantation” located beside the Ogun State Low-Cost Housing Estate near the NYSC Orientation Camp.
In the statement, the council alleged that some individuals were illegally selling and developing the land and maintained that the property had been earmarked for the proposed New Sagamu Government Reserved Area (GRA).
However, the Akarigbo family has countered the claim, describing the land as private ancestral property and not government-owned.
Speaking on behalf of the family, Omoba Babatunde Adegboyega Igimisoje, Secretary of the Odumena Igimisoje-Anoko family, said the land forms part of Orile-Ofin, which he described as the ancestral headquarters of Remo before the creation of Sagamu town.
According to him, the area is an inheritance from their forefathers and historically belongs to the Akarigbo lineage.
“Orile-Ofin is our ancestral land and the headquarters of Remo in those days. It was during the reign of our forefathers that Sagamu was later formed and settled in 1872, while Orile-Ofin remained our village,” he said.
He explained that the specific portion currently in dispute historically belonged to Oba Odumena Igimisoje-Anoko, whom he described as the last Igimisoje-Anoko to reign as king on the land.
Reacting to the local government’s ownership claim, Adegboyega insisted that the rubber plantation was never government property.
He said the land was only temporarily acquired by the old Western Region government in 1959 for agricultural purposes.
“In 1959, the Western Region acquired the land for rubber plantation, but that did not transfer ownership to the government permanently,” he stated.
The family further claimed that the land was later returned to the original owners.
According to him, during the administration of former Governor Gbenga Daniel between 2008 and 2011, steps were taken to return the land to the family, while his successor, Senator Ibikunle Amosun, allegedly revoked lingering government control and formally handed it back to the Odumena Igimisoje-Anoko family.
“It was duly returned to the rightful owners. So it is surprising to now hear that the land is being described as local government property,” he said.
He cautioned the council chairman against interfering in what he called a family land matter.
“The rubber plantation land is not government land and does not belong to the local government. The chairman should not join an issue he does not fully understand,” he added.
In the same vein, Prince Abdul Fatai, an executive member of the Anoko family, also warned the local government to stay away from the land, describing it as their forefathers’ heritage.
He appealed to the Ogun State Government and the Akarigbo of Remoland to intervene in the matter to prevent tension and ensure peace in the community.
“We are calling on the state government and the Akarigbo to step in so that this issue can be resolved peacefully. This is our inheritance, and we want justice,” he said.
Meanwhile, Sagamu Local Government had maintained that the land belongs to the Ogun State Government and warned that anyone found buying, selling, fencing or developing plots in the area would face arrest and prosecution.
The dispute has now set the stage for a possible legal and administrative battle over ownership, with both sides standing firm on their claims.
Residents say they hope authorities and traditional institutions will urgently intervene to clarify ownership and prevent further conflict or losses for unsuspecting buyers.
Continue Reading

news

Sagamu Communities Exonerate Sir Kay Oluwo, Accuse Teriba of Land Invasions, Violence

Published

on

Residents of Ajeregun and eight other neighbouring communities in Sagamu Local Government Area of Ogun State have distanced businessman Sir Kay Oluwo from allegations of land grabbing and unrest in the area, instead accusing one Kazeem Teriba and his associates of orchestrating violent land invasions and illegal sales of community lands.
The community’s attempts to link Sir Kay Oluwo to the disturbances were false and misleading, maintaining that he only acquired lands through legitimate family transactions backed by agreements and receipts.
Speaking on behalf of Ajeregun and Oyewole Bakare villages, Mr. Akani Awokoya said Teriba and his group had been crossing into neighbouring communities to sell lands without the consent of rightful owners.
“It is not Sir Kay Oluwo that is disturbing us,” Awokoya said. “Kazeem Teriba and his boys are the ones causing the problem. They come into our communities and start selling our lands without permission.”
He explained that Sir Kay Oluwo purchased land lawfully from his family.
“I personally sold my father’s land to Sir Kay. We have agreements and receipts. It was a proper transaction,” he added.
Awokoya alleged that Teriba’s group had been linked to repeated acts of intimidation and violence in the area, creating fear among residents.
“These people operate like bandits. They invade communities and disturb the peace. We have reported them to the police and also petitioned the Akarigbo-in-Council,” he said.
Corroborating the claims, the Public Relations Officer representing the nine communities in Aroko Latawa village, Prince Raheem Shitta Adeoye, also absolved Sir Kay Oluwo of any wrongdoing.
According to him, the unrest being experienced across the communities began last year and was allegedly tied to Teriba and his associates.
“Sir Kay Oluwo is not disturbing anyone here. Kazeem Teriba and his boys are the ones causing the unrest. That is why all the nine communities are crying out to the government for help,” Adeoye said.
He noted that Oluwo only purchased land legitimately, while some individuals were laying claim to ownership of multiple villages.
Meanwhile, families in the affected communities, through their solicitors, Tawose & Tawose Chambers, have submitted a petition to the Inspector-General of Police over the alleged activities of Teriba and several others.
The petition accused the suspects of offences including aiding and abetting violence, conspiracy, unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition, assault, and conduct likely to cause a breach of public peace.
The solicitors alleged that the named individuals invaded Ajeregun village in Sagamu armed with guns, shooting sporadically and causing panic among residents.
They further claimed that during one of the incidents, a villager, Nasiru Semiu, sustained gunshot wounds and later died, while others were injured.
In a response dated January 5, 2026, the Office of the Inspector-General of Police acknowledged receipt of the petition and directed the Commissioner of Police, Ogun State Command, Eleweran, Abeokuta, to investigate the matter.
The letter, signed by CP Lateef Adio Ahmed, Principal Staff Officer to the Inspector-General of Police, confirmed that the case had been referred to the state command for appropriate action.
Community leaders said the development reinforces their call for a thorough investigation and urged the state government and security agencies to intervene to restore peace.
They maintained that Sir Kay Oluwo should not be blamed for the crisis and insisted that attention should instead focus on those allegedly responsible for the disturbances.
Meanwhile, Mr. Kazeem Teriba could not be reached for comment, as calls placed to his phone were not answered at the time of filing this report.
Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending