Connect with us

Politics

Primate Ayodele’s Prophecies On Tunisia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Others Come To Pass

Published

on

How Primate Ayodele Foretold Murder Of Hamas Leader, Ismail Haniyeh In March

Primate Ayodele’s Prophecies On Tunisia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Others Come To Pass

 

 

It does feel like Primate Elijah Ayodele is the only prophet in the world because how do you explain the narrative that just one man gets credited for foretelling every significant event that happens in the world?

 

 

There are other prophets but they are only known by their names, not by their prophetic excellence and sagacity like Primate Ayodele. Even in countries people are not familiar with, Primate Ayodele’s prophetic signals are widely recognized there. This only shows that the hand of the Lord is upon his ministry.

 

 

 

Recently, there seems to be a high influx of the prophet’s fulfilled prophecies; his social media pages are filled with evidence of how his prophecies come to pass about one country or another on a daily basis. The African continent is indeed blessed to have a prophet like Primate Elijah Ayodele.

 

Primate Ayodele’s Prophecies On Tunisia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Others Come To Pass

 

His ministry is one that isn’t concerned about popular sectors or countries alone, He goes as far as prophesying for countries that are regarded as third-world countries and sectors that are seen as unimportant. Due to the fact that he sometimes deals with unpopular countries and sectors, his prophecies don’t get a quick reaction but when they come to pass, people who saw them get reminded of the prophet’s genuineness.

 

 

 

 

One of his latest fulfilled prophecies is the sack of Tunisia’s Prime Minister, Najla Bouden on Tuesday. The prime minister was sacked due to economic woes faced in the country. Primate Ayodele on July 22 released a prophecy on his Facebook page warning all female prime ministers in Africa to be careful against being sacked.

 

 

 

These were his words

‘’We have four women prime ministers in Africa and among them, one will be cheated and might want to quit. She might not complete her government. I want to mention her name but God said I should warn all the women prime minister in Africa against crisis, impending danger and political crisis that will trouble them.

Just as Primate Ayodele warned, one of the Prime Ministers have been sacked.

Also in Pakistan where there was a suicide bomb attacked that has claimed 63 lives as we speak, Primate Ayodele in his newly released Warnings To The Nations 2023/2024 edition noted that he foresees unexpected killings in the country. This can be found on page 93 of the prophecy book.

These were his words

‘’ PAKISTAN: The country must pray against flooding, water accidents and train accidents. I foresee an opposition party leader will be arrested. There will be unexpected killings and deaths. There will be an attempt to assassinate the president.’’

In Bangladesh, there has been clamour for the prime minister to resign. The people have taken to the streets to express their grievances and to further push their wish for the prime minister to resign from his position. Primate Ayodele in his prophecy book said that he foresees the people of Bangladesh calling for a new government.

‘’ BANGLADESH: I foresee the country will face a lot of problems and must pray against flooding. The spirit of God says the country will have a financial crisis. People will call for a change of government even as they must rebuke explosions.’’ (Pg 70)

There is no prophet in the world that has spoken about countries like Bangladesh. As a matter of fact, the country may not even have a prophet but God spoke through his servant to the city regarding what will be faced and it has now come to pass as he said it.

Several other prophecies have come to pass recently and they include the plane crash in Nigeria, crisis in Senegal, looting in Adamawa, to mention a few.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Politics

Osun Govt Denies Forcing Council Officers to Change Account Signatories Amid Political Tussle

Published

on

Osun Govt Denies Forcing Council Officers to Change Account Signatories Amid Political Tussle

Osun Govt Denies Forcing Council Officers to Change Account Signatories Amid Political Tussle

The Osun State Government has dismissed allegations that it is coercing career officers in local governments to alter signatories to council accounts amid the ongoing power struggle between the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) over local government control.

The Chairman of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) in Osun, Mr. Adewale Adebayo, alleged that Governor Ademola Adeleke’s administration was pressuring Finance Directors and Heads of Local Administration (HLAs) to make unauthorized changes to council accounts.

“We reliably gathered that Adeleke’s government has started taking 30 Local Government Area Finance Directors and Heads of Local Administration to an undisclosed location forcefully. This is unconnected to the contention over who controls the local government,” Adebayo claimed.

He further alleged that these officials were being detained and pressured into changing signatories to align with the newly elected officials, an act he described as undemocratic and a violation of the rule of law. Adebayo also referenced judicial pronouncements from the Court of Appeal that upheld the October 15, 2022, council election, asserting that the state government’s actions contradict the verdict.

However, Osun State Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Kolapo Alimi, swiftly refuted the claims, dismissing them as “mere speculation.”

“This is just an attempt to create a false narrative. The Commissioner for Local Government has confirmed that he never issued such a directive. They are only trying to stir unnecessary controversy,” Alimi stated.

“We have never changed any local government account signatories. APM is just crying more than the bereaved,” he added.

Meanwhile, the APC in Osun has urged local government workers to return to their duty posts, emphasizing that they must remain neutral in the ongoing political tussle. Jamiu Olawumi, a former Special Adviser on Education under ex-Governor Adegboyega Oyetola, stated that the reinstated local government chairmen had issued a 72-hour ultimatum for workers to resume.

However, the Osun chapter of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) rejected the directive, with Chairman Christopher Arapasopo insisting that workers would only return when their security was guaranteed.

Despite the NLC’s stance, Olawumi maintained that workers were expected to resume, noting that chairmen and councillors had already resumed work.

“It is quite unfortunate that they (workers) are becoming partisan. They need to understand that they are not employed by the state government but by individual local governments. That is why they have Heads of Local Government Administration,” Olawumi stated.

“We encourage them to eschew partisanship and focus on their work. The ultimatum lapses today (Wednesday), and we expect them to resume tomorrow (Thursday). If they don’t, we will continue persuading them,” he added.

Efforts to reach NLC Chairman Arapasopo for comment were unsuccessful, as calls to his phone did not go through, and he had yet to respond to text messages at press time.

Amid the controversy, an Osun-based civil society group, The Osun Masterminds, has called for a return to the courts to resolve the dispute.

Speaking in Osogbo, the Executive Director of the group, Prof. Wasiu Oyedokun-Alli, urged all parties to refrain from inflammatory remarks that could escalate tensions.

“All parties must immediately return to the relevant courts to clarify the subsisting judgments so that the current issues can be amicably resolved,” Oyedokun-Alli stated.

“Once clarified, all parties must respect the decision of the courts and lay the matter to rest once and for all. As we approach the 2026 Osun gubernatorial election, all parties must demonstrate their commitment to peace and security. If this crisis escalates into next year, it could destabilize our once peaceful Osun State.

“Local government staff must remain non-partisan and adhere to the rule of law to avoid becoming political tools in the hands of any party,” he concluded.

Continue Reading

Politics

Falana Declares Legal War Over ‘Malicious’ 1993 Prosecution, Takes on Babangida Regime

Published

on

Falana Declares Legal War Over 'Malicious' 1993 Prosecution, Takes on Babangida Regime

Falana Declares Legal War Over ‘Malicious’ 1993 Prosecution, Takes on Babangida Regime

 

Renowned human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, has launched an audacious legal battle against what he describes as his “malicious” detention and prosecution under the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida (retd.), vowing to hold the former dictator accountable.

Speaking on Channels TV on Tuesday, Falana, who was detained alongside the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN) and three others, recounted their persecution for resisting the annulment of the historic June 12, 1993, presidential election, which was decisively won by Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola.

Falana slammed Babangida for his recent admission of regret over the annulment, labeling it as an admission of guilt. He accused the former military ruler of systematically dismantling Nigeria’s democracy, detaining and parading pro-democracy activists like criminals while clinging to power.

Recalling the harrowing events of 1993, Falana revealed that he and his colleagues were hauled before the Gwagwalada Chief Magistrate Court and charged with treasonable felony. With no access to legal representation, he and Fawehinmi took on the military regime in court, turning their arraignment into an exposé of junta tyranny.

“Even though we were asking for bail, we turned our arraignment into the trial of the junta. Chief Fawehinmi told the judge, Chief Magistrate Mallam Bulama, that those who should be standing trial for treason were actually in the Villa, led by General Babangida,” Falana recalled.

He challenged the legitimacy of the charge, arguing before the court that the law on treason was inapplicable to an unelected military dictator. The court ultimately granted them bail, and the regime, unable to withstand further scrutiny, abandoned the case entirely.

Now, decades later, Falana is reigniting the battle, assembling a powerful legal team to seek redress for what he describes as a grave miscarriage of justice.

“This is malicious prosecution. I have assembled a team of lawyers who are looking into it. Babangida has now admitted that there was no basis for our prosecution, because he acknowledges that Abiola won the election. That was the reason we protested.

“His own words confirm the injustice we suffered,” Falana declared.

The senior advocate is also pushing for recognition of the massive human rights violations suffered under Babangida’s rule, citing international human rights charters.

“When you detain me in Kuje prison, you violate my right to liberty, my freedom of movement, and my right to choose the government of my country.

“According to Article 13 of the African Charter on Human Rights, the man who did it has now confessed that it was wrong,” Falana stated.

He further referenced recent legal precedents that challenge statutes of limitation in cases of severe human rights abuses, emphasizing that justice must prevail no matter how long it takes.

With this renewed legal offensive, Falana is not only seeking personal redress but also pushing to set a precedent against impunity, sending a strong message that Nigeria’s pro-democracy fighters will not relent in their pursuit of justice.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate Clashes with Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as N100.3bn Lawsuit Rocks National Assembly

Published

on

Senate Clashes with Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as N100.3bn Lawsuit Rocks National Assembly

Senate Clashes with Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as N100.3bn Lawsuit Rocks National Assembly

In a dramatic escalation of tensions within the Nigerian Senate, lawmakers have rallied behind Senate President Godswill Akpabio after Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan of Kogi Central Senatorial District filed a staggering N100.3bn defamation lawsuit against him.

The lawsuit, which has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, stems from a heated confrontation between Akpabio and Akpoti-Uduaghan last week over the controversial relocation of her Senate seat. The verbal altercation, which played out in full view of the public, has now turned into a full-blown legal battle.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, a first-time senator, formally filed suit CV/737/25 before the Federal Capital Territory High Court on February 25, 2025, accusing Akpabio of defamation. The lawsuit also names the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Akpabio’s Senior Legislative Aide, Mfon Patrick, as co-defendants.

The storm erupted after the Senate spokesperson, Yemi Adaramodu, lashed out at Akpoti-Uduaghan during a Channels Television interview on February 21, condemning her bold stance against the Senate President. He dismissed her actions as political theatrics, stating, “The National Assembly is not for content creation in entertainment. The National Assembly is for serious business.”

The firestorm intensified when Patrick allegedly took to Facebook to publish a statement titled, ‘Is the Local Content Committee of the Senate Natasha’s Birthright?’ The post included an incendiary remark, accusing Akpoti-Uduaghan of being more focused on “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers” than on legislative duties.

Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal counsel, Victor Giwa, denounced the statement as an outrageous attack on her integrity, arguing that it was defamatory, provocative, and deliberately designed to tarnish her reputation among her colleagues and the public.

The embattled senator is demanding a court declaration that the statement was defamatory and has urged the judiciary to issue a perpetual injunction preventing Akpabio and his associates from making further derogatory remarks against her.

She is also pressing for a jaw-dropping N100bn in general damages and an additional N300m in litigation costs, making this one of the most high-profile defamation cases in Nigeria’s recent history.

As tensions soar within the Senate, political analysts warn that the lawsuit could further fracture relationships within the upper legislative chamber. The case is expected to be closely watched, with many awaiting the court’s decision on the explosive claims.

For now, the Senate remains a battlefield, and all eyes are on the judiciary as it prepares to weigh in on this unprecedented legal showdown.

In a dramatic escalation of tensions within the Nigerian Senate, lawmakers have rallied behind Senate President Godswill Akpabio after Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan of Kogi Central Senatorial District filed a staggering N100.3bn defamation lawsuit against him.

The lawsuit, which has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, stems from a heated confrontation between Akpabio and Akpoti-Uduaghan last week over the controversial relocation of her Senate seat. The verbal altercation, which played out in full view of the public, has now turned into a full-blown legal battle.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, a first-time senator, formally filed suit CV/737/25 before the Federal Capital Territory High Court on February 25, 2025, accusing Akpabio of defamation. The lawsuit also names the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Akpabio’s Senior Legislative Aide, Mfon Patrick, as co-defendants.

The storm erupted after the Senate spokesperson, Yemi Adaramodu, lashed out at Akpoti-Uduaghan during a Channels Television interview on February 21, condemning her bold stance against the Senate President. He dismissed her actions as political theatrics, stating, “The National Assembly is not for content creation in entertainment. The National Assembly is for serious business.”

The firestorm intensified when Patrick allegedly took to Facebook to publish a statement titled, ‘Is the Local Content Committee of the Senate Natasha’s Birthright?’ The post included an incendiary remark, accusing Akpoti-Uduaghan of being more focused on “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers” than on legislative duties.

Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal counsel, Victor Giwa, denounced the statement as an outrageous attack on her integrity, arguing that it was defamatory, provocative, and deliberately designed to tarnish her reputation among her colleagues and the public.

The embattled senator is demanding a court declaration that the statement was defamatory and has urged the judiciary to issue a perpetual injunction preventing Akpabio and his associates from making further derogatory remarks against her.

She is also pressing for a jaw-dropping N100bn in general damages and an additional N300m in litigation costs, making this one of the most high-profile defamation cases in Nigeria’s recent history.

As tensions soar within the Senate, political analysts warn that the lawsuit could further fracture relationships within the upper legislative chamber. The case is expected to be closely watched, with many awaiting the court’s decision on the explosive claims.

For now, the Senate remains a battlefield, and all eyes are on the judiciary as it prepares to weigh in on this unprecedented legal showdown.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending