society
South Africa’s Sovereign Stand: Defending Deportation of Kenyan Nationals and Rebuking U.S. Allegations
South Africa’s Sovereign Stand: Defending Deportation of Kenyan Nationals and Rebuking U.S. Allegations.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com
In a world where national sovereignty increasingly collides with global geopolitical muscle-flexing, South Africa’s recent deportation of seven Kenyan nationals (and its rebuff of allegations emanating from the United States) stands as a defining moment in African statecraft. The incidents have not only ignited diplomatic tensions between Pretoria and Washington, but they have also exposed the fault lines of immigration sovereignty, foreign interventionism, and the rule of law in international relations.
The uproar centers on South Africa’s lawful arrest and deportation of seven Kenyan nationals who were found working without valid permits at an immigration application centre in Johannesburg. The facility was linked to the processing of refugee applications for the United States (particularly for white South Africans under a controversial U.S. resettlement programme) and has since become the fulcrum of a diplomatic dispute.
A Lawful Enforcement Action Met With Foreign Accusation. On 16 December 2025, in an intelligence-driven operation, South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs (DHA), in cooperation with law enforcement partners, raided an immigration processing centre in Johannesburg where seven Kenyan nationals were found engaging in work while holding tourist visas. According to official statements, these individuals had previously applied for lawful work permits (requests that had been denied) yet continued to work in violation of the terms of entry into the country.
Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber later confirmed that the seven were issued deportation orders and banned from re-entry into South Africa for five years. He emphasised that the operation was conducted in strict compliance with South African immigration laws and that no United States officials were arrested during the process, which did not take place on a diplomatic site.
Yet, the United States (through statements issued by the U.S. State Department) accused South African authorities of detaining American personnel and unlawfully publicising personal information of U.S. officials. Washington cautioned that failure to hold those responsible to account could lead to “SEVERE CONSEQUENCES.”
South Africa has categorically rejected these allegations.
In a statement issued by the Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), Pretoria labelled the suggestion of data exposure or harassment of U.S. officials as unfounded and devoid of credible evidence. The government reiterated that matters of data security are treated with “UTMOST SERIOUSNESS” and governed by established legal and diplomatic protocols. It underscored its commitment to principled diplomacy grounded in mutual respect and factual dialogue.
Sovereignty and the Rule of Law: Defending. Constitutional Mandates
South Africa’s position is not merely a defensive posture; it is an assertive declaration of state sovereignty and adherence to its legal framework. As DIRCO’s official statement put it, “The government will not negotiate its sovereignty and the implementation of the rule of law.”
This declaration resonates with foundational principles of international law. Sovereignty (the absolute authority of a state to govern its territory and enforce its laws) is a bedrock norm recognised universally. South Africa’s enforcement of its immigration statutes, particularly concerning who may work within its borders and under what conditions, is a legitimate exercise of that sovereign authority.
Professor Steven Friedman, a respected South African political analyst, argues:
“A sovereign state must, at all times, uphold the primacy of its laws. No amount of external pressure (even from powerful allies) should compromise that obligation.”
Furthermore, immigration violations are not trivial administrative infractions. They concern questions of national security, labour regulation, public order, and fairness in the administration of visas and permits. South African law (like that of other sovereign states) stipulates that work without a permit is a prosecutable offence, irrespective of the employer or perceived humanitarian objectives of foreign entities.
Foreign Programmes and Uneasy Diplomatic Terrain. The controversy is exacerbated by the highly politicised backdrop of the U.S. refugee programme at the centre of this incident. Under the administration of President Donald Trump, the United States dramatically reshaped its refugee policy, instituting a low cap on global admissions and prioritising special arrangements for white South Africans who claim racial persecution under domestic policies like Black Economic Empowerment. These claims have been widely disputed both within South Africa and by international legal scholars.
In legally robust terms, South Africa does not recognise white South Africans as refugees and a category reserved for those who face persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group, as defined under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention. No credible evidence supports claims of state-sanctioned persecution of white citizens.
Dr. Michael Schmidt, a scholar of international refugee law, states:
“A host state must not become complicit in the redefinition of persecution criteria for political convenience. Refugee status is a legal category and not a political bargaining chip.”
The fact that the centre in question was engaged in processing such applications (and that foreign workers were present without proper authorisation) raised legitimate concerns for South African authorities about the legality and diplomatic propriety of the operation.
Diplomatic Engagement: Rejecting Threats, Embracing Dialogue. Despite the tension, South Africa has not shut the door on diplomacy. DIRCO has asserted that it has engaged the United States through official channels to clarify the allegations and to ensure that future interactions respect both countries’ legal frameworks and mutual interests.
In the words of Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool, South Africa’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations:
“Diplomacy is not conducted through threats or unilateral declarations. It requires dialogue rooted in facts, mutual understanding, and respect for sovereign law.”
This approach reflects a mature understanding of statecraft. South Africa is neither isolationist nor adversarial by default, but it will push back against narratives that compromise its legal autonomy.
Contextualising the U.S. Response. The United States’ sharp reaction (including threats of “severe consequences”) stems from multiple sources. Washington is sensitive to perceived challenges to its global leadership, especially where humanitarian or refugee programmes are involved. Moreover, the political utility of the Afrikaner refugee narrative within certain U.S. domestic constituencies has amplified tensions. However, diplomacy that favours ideological narratives over legal realities cannot withstand scrutiny in the global arena.
Renowned international law expert Professor Fatima Hussain encapsulates the issue succinctly:
“International cooperation cannot thrive on the assumption that might makes right. Respect for legal norms must transcend political posturing.”
Sovereignty on Trial: A Landmark Moment for Principle and Law. South Africa’s handling of the deportation of Kenyan nationals (and its decisive rejection of unfounded allegations) serves as a reminder that the rule of law cannot be subordinated to geopolitical pressure. In an era where powerful nations often wield influence over weaker states, Pretoria’s forthright stance affirms that sovereignty and legal order remain paramount.
More than an immigration enforcement action, this episode is a litmus test of the principles that underpin just international relations. It calls on African nations (and indeed all states) to defend legal sovereignty, resist external coercion, and uphold dignity in diplomatic engagement.
As the dust settles, the conversation must move beyond partisan headlines and confront the substantive issues at stake: legitimate law enforcement, respect for sovereign borders, and an international system governed not by unilateral threats, but by shared commitment to law, order, and mutual respect.
news
Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration
Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration
…Calls for Accountability in Nigeria’s Grassroots Governance
LAGOS, Nigeria — A civil society coalition known as Journalists for Good Governance(JGG) has intensified public debate on transparency and accountability within Nigeria’s local government system, urging media professionals, civil society actors, and citizens to hold grassroots leaders accountable.
Speaking an event in Lagos recently, the acting chairman of the society, Comrade Bunmi Obarotimi said that despite reforms such as the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling granting financial autonomy to all 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs), systemic challenges continues to hinder effective service delivery and responsible stewardship of public funds.
“Local governments are the closest tier of government to the people — yet too often they remain the least transparent. Without civic oversight and vibrant media, promises of autonomy ring hollow.” the acting chairman said.
The Journalist for Good Governance emphasised crucial roles that journalists can play in uncovering discrepancies in council spending, flagging poor service delivery, and educating citizens on their rights. Their call comes amid wider efforts by media and civic organisations to bridge accountability gaps. The civil society initiatives had previously launched monitoring campaigns to track local government expenditures and have been quietly advocating for transparency in how public money is deployed.
The leaders of the Journalists for Good Governance (JGG) highlighted the importance of physical assessment and citizens engagement on projects to boost people’s confidence, urging local councils to adopt open data platforms and proactive information dissemination in compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. Experts say the majority of LGAs currently lack operational websites or digital portals, further limiting public scrutiny.
The Journalists for Good Governance initiative aligns with sustained advocacy by civil society groups and governance experts calling for a collective approach to strengthening democratic accountability, and has decided to engage in critical and holistic assessments of how Local Governments is being run and the impact and quality of projects they embark-on and to address deficits in transparency and public trust.
Meanwhile, some state governments have signalled support for improved community engagement. In Lagos State, authorities reiterated a commitment to enhancing community media platforms as vehicles for civic participation and accountability at the grassroots level.
The renewed spotlight on local government administration has reignited public debate over fiscal responsibility and priorities. Controversies such as the widely criticised Adamawa council chairmen’s wives trip to Istanbul — which drew public outrage for perceived misuse of public funds — underscore why watchdog groups say stronger oversight mechanisms are urgently needed at the grassroots.
Citizens and activists have welcomed the journalists’ initiative, calling for sustained media engagement that goes beyond headlines to influence policy and accountability reform.
The civic rights advocates note that real change will require robust legal frameworks, a free press, and empowered communities equipped to demand transparency at every level of governance.
As Journalists for Good Governance mobilises its members, the coming months are likely to see heightened media attention on grassroots administration — from council budgets and service delivery to the enforcement of public information laws and digital transparency initiatives.
society
Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections
Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections
Two years after the last general election, Nigerians are justified in asking a direct question: is our democracy stronger today than it was then? Democracy is not measured by how many offices a party controls or how loudly politicians speak. It is measured by integrity, accountability, and the lived experience of the people. Good Politics demands more than victory at the polls; it demands moral leadership and visible progress in the lives of citizens.
The debate over amendments to the Electoral Act should have provided an opportunity to deepen transparency and strengthen public confidence. Instead, hesitation to fully embrace reforms that safeguard credible vote transmission and accountability has fueled doubt. In a nation where electoral credibility remains fragile, any reluctance to reinforce safeguards sends the wrong signal. Good Politics stands firmly for processes that are open, fair, and beyond suspicion.
The party in power commands significant authority across the federation. With control of the presidency, many state governments, a strong presence in the National Assembly, and influence at local levels, there should be no anxiety about reforms that ensure free and fair elections. Confidence in leadership is demonstrated not by dominance, but by a willingness to subject power to scrutiny. Politics rooted in the omoluabi ethos embraces fairness, transparency, and responsibility, even when inconvenient.
This is the standard long associated with Awolowo, whose politics emphasized discipline, social welfare, education, and institutional strength. His vision was not merely about holding office, but about transforming society through principled governance. Good Politics follows that tradition. It rejects manipulation, arrogance, and the concentration of power without accountability. It insists that authority must serve the people, not itself.
Beyond electoral reforms, democracy must deliver tangible relief. Across the country, households struggle with rising prices and shrinking purchasing power. Small businesses are burdened by escalating costs. Young people search for opportunities that remain scarce. When economic hardship deepens, democracy feels abstract. Good Politics recognizes that political legitimacy is reinforced when citizens can see and feel the benefits of governance.
The concentration of power within a single political structure should translate into coordinated reform and measurable development. When it does not, questions naturally arise. Democracy weakens when dominance replaces performance. It weakens when loyalty to party eclipses loyalty to principle. The omoluabi tradition teaches that character defines leadership. Without character, authority becomes hollow.
A healthy democracy requires credible elections and compassionate governance. It requires leaders who understand that politics is a moral enterprise. Two years into this administration, many Nigerians remain uncertain about the direction of both our democratic processes and their daily welfare. If democracy is to endure, it must reflect Good Politics: fairness in competition, integrity in conduct, and compassion in governance. Anything less falls short of the standard that our history and our values demand.
news
GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA
GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA
The Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa Support Initiative (GCGMSI) has commended the Zamfara State Government for its decisive contribution to security operations through the donation of newly acquired armoured personnel carriers (APCs), surveillance drones, and other critical operational equipment to troops and security agencies in the state.
This commendation was contained in a statement signed by the Convener of the GCGMSI, Ibrahim Dahiru Danfulani, Sadaukin Garkuwan Keffi/Betara Biu, and made available to the press.
The equipment was formally commissioned on Wednesday, February 18, by the Grand Patron of the GCGMSI and Minister of Defence, General Christopher Gwabin Musa, OFR (rtd.), in a ceremony at the Government House, Gusau. The event was attended by senior military officers, heads of security agencies, and top officials of the Zamfara State Government.
The GCGMSI, in its statement, hailed the donation as a “transformative and timely intervention” that aligns perfectly with its core objective of advocating for and supporting tangible measures that enhance the operational capacity and welfare of Nigeria’s security forces. The Initiative praised Governor Dauda Lawal’s administration for moving beyond rhetoric to actionable, material support, describing the move as a “blueprint for state-level collaboration in national security.”
“The provision of these assets by the Zamfara State Government is a testament to visionary leadership and a profound commitment to the peace and stability of its people,” the GCGMSI statement read. “It represents the exact kind of synergistic partnership between state and federal authorities that the GCGMSI champions. This initiative will significantly close operational gaps, boost the confidence of our gallant troops, and send a strong message to criminal elements.”
Speaking at the commissioning, General Musa emphasized that sustained collaboration is indispensable in confronting the nation’s evolving security challenges. He specifically commended Governor Lawal for his proactive support.
“Governor Dauda Lawal has demonstrated exemplary leadership and an unwavering dedication to the security of Zamfara State,” the Defence Minister stated. “The provision of these armoured vehicles, surveillance drones, and other operational equipment will undoubtedly boost the morale and operational effectiveness of our troops and other security agencies on the ground. This is a commendable effort that should be emulated by others.”
The newly commissioned assets, which include multiple APCs and advanced surveillance drones, are expected to dramatically enhance the mobility, protection, intelligence-gathering, and rapid response capabilities of security forces, particularly in the state’s remote and difficult terrains where anti-banditry operations are ongoing.
In his remarks, Governor Lawal reiterated his administration’s steadfast commitment to being a reliable partner in the security architecture. He urged security agencies to deploy the new resources responsibly and effectively to safeguard lives and property.
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Defence, reaffirmed its commitment to continuing and deepening such partnerships with state governments across the nation to strengthen coordination and resource allocation in the collective fight against insecurity.
The GCGMSI concluded its statement by urging other state governments to take a cue from Zamfara’s “bold and pragmatic” approach, affirming that such concrete support is vital for achieving lasting peace and security across Nigeria.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
society5 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING



