society
The Frayed Thread: How Geopolitical Strife, Climate Breakdown and Food Insecurity Threaten Our Common Future
The Frayed Thread: How Geopolitical Strife, Climate Breakdown and Food Insecurity Threaten Our Common Future.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com
“A blistering call to concerted action after President Cyril Ramaphosa’s G20 warning — because polite complacency is now a crime against our children.
When President Cyril Ramaphosa stood before the G20 and warned that “the threats facing humanity today; from escalating geopolitical tensions, global warming, pandemics, energy and food insecurity jeopardise our collective future,” he did not offer a polite diplomatic observation: he issued an alarm bell. That sentence is not a speech flourish. It is a diagnosis, a legal brief, and a moral indictment rolled into one. The world is being rent along multiple fault lines at once and those ruptures are interacting in ways that amplify suffering, undermine institutions, and make yesterday’s crises look quaint at the G20.
Let us be clear about what we are confronting. On the food front, the United Nations flagship analysis makes plain that hunger is not a vague, distant problem to be solved by feel-good charity; it is resurging, structural, and measurable. In 2024 some 673 million people (roughly 8 percent of humanity) experienced hunger, and roughly 2.3 billion people were moderately or severely food insecure; hundreds of millions more than before the pandemic. These figures are not abstractions: they map to children stunted by malnutrition, to economies hollowed out by lost productivity, and to political tinderboxes where food scarcity feeds conflict and displacement.
Worse still, acute food crises have ballooned. Independent reporting and the Global Report on Food Crises show that nearly 300 million people faced severe, acute food crises in 2024 — a horrifying figure driven by war, economic collapse, and weather extremes. Humanitarian agencies warn that tens of millions could slide from crisis into outright famine unless funding and ceasefires arrive. This is not a distant news brief; it is a rolling catastrophe unfolding in real time in places such as Sudan, Gaza, parts of the Sahel, Yemen and beyond.
Why should a South African-hosted G20 care? Because geopolitics, climate and food are not separate spheres: they are three cogs of a single machine that, if left unchecked, will grind civilization into anarchy. Geopolitical tensions (rivalries between great powers, regional wars, proxy conflicts and the weaponisation of aid and trade) disrupt supply chains, spike prices and close off humanitarian corridors. When fertilizers, fuel and transport are priced out of reach or blocked by sanctions and conflict, harvests fail, markets panic and millions can’t afford a daily meal. The World Food Programme has repeatedly warned that funding shortfalls compounded by geopolitical choices have placed some 58 million people at the brink of an extreme hunger crisis; a direct consequence of policy choices as much as weather.
Then there is climate, the slow, remorseless amplifier. Climate scientists and planetary-boundary researchers, warning in ever more urgent tones, tell us we are perilously close to tipping points: irreversible shifts like the dieback of the Amazon, the collapse of parts of the Antarctic ice sheet, or a breakdown in major ocean currents that sustain monsoons. Those shifts do not merely raise sea levels; they rewrite the map of agriculture, collapse freshwater systems, and trigger migration on an epic scale. Leading scientists warn that transgressing multiple planetary thresholds will undermine the Earth’s life-support systems — with catastrophic consequences for food production and human security.
Add inequality and economic policy to the mix and you have a perfect storm. Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and other economists have framed the present era as an “INEQUALITY EMERGENCY” a structural fragility that leaves entire populations unable to absorb shocks. Inequality sharpens the effects of famine and heatwaves because poor households cannot diversify livelihoods, access credit, or relocate. It also fuels political polarization; angry, desperate populations are tinder for demagogues and violent actors who exploit scarcity to consolidate power. The G20 itself has been urged to confront inequality as a systemic risk to global stability.
These are not problems that can be outsourced to NGOs. They are governance failures writ large: failures of diplomacy when sanctions and saber-rattling choke trade; failures of climate stewardship when fossil-fuel interests stall transitions; failures of solidarity when humanitarian funding is traded for geopolitical advantage. António Guterres and other global leaders have been blunt: hunger is being weaponized, and climate inaction is an act of intergenerational theft. That language may sting, but it must sting — EUPHEMISMS have had their day.
So what must happen? First: treat these threats as STRATEGIC; not CHARITABLE. Food systems, energy systems and climate resilience belong at the core of national security strategies. That means stockpiles for emergencies, safeguarded humanitarian corridors, and trade instruments designed to keep essential goods moving even in times of diplomatic fracture. It means debt-relief tied to investments in resilient agriculture and social protections so that poor nations aren’t forced to choose between service payments and feeding their children.
Second: elevate CLIMATE ACTION from SLOGAN to STRICT POLICY. The technological breakthroughs in renewables and storage are real; but without large-scale finance, just transition programs for fossil-fuel dependent communities, and rapid removal of market distortions that favour carbon-intensive industries, the window to limit warming to survivable bounds will slam shut. Scientists implore immediate, profound cuts in emissions and an urgent scale-up of carbon removal where necessary; not as an OPTIONAL ADD-ON but as an OBLIGATION.
Third: rebuild international cooperation mechanisms. The G20 has a unique convening power; Ramaphosa’s hosting moment must be used to forge binding, accountable pledges: emergency funding guarantees for food crises, a MULTILATERAL COMPACT to DE-ESCALATE CONFLICTS that IMPEDE food flows, and an international panel on inequality and shared prosperity modeled on proposals backed by leading economists. These are politically hard, but the alternative is to watch fragile states fail and generate waves of displacement and conflict that will ripple back to every G20 capital.
Finally: put justice at the center. Climate and food insecurity are not blind forces; they fall hardest on those who contributed least to the problem. Any credible response must include transfer of FINANCE and TECHNOLOGY to the Global South, fair trade terms for agricultural producers, and mechanisms to protect smallholder farmers from market shocks and climate volatility.
This is not an essay in despair. It is a summons. Diplomacy can quiet guns; investment can rebuild soils and power grids; policy can protect the most vulnerable. But none of that will happen if we muddle along with incrementalism and hollow talk. President Ramaphosa’s line at the G20 is more than a sentence, it is a MANDATE for URGENCY. We have the evidence, the science, and the moral case. What we lack is the political courage to act at the scale required.
If not now, when? If not together, who? The future will not forgive the generation that chose complacency while its children starved and its lands burned. The time for excuses is over; the time for systemic, cooperative action has arrived. The G20, UNICEF, FAO, WFP, scientists and civil society must stop trading EUPHEMISMS for results. We must convert ALARM into ACCOUNTABILITY and PROMISES into IMMEDIATE, MEASURABLE INTERVENTIONS. Anything less will be a betrayal of the most basic compact between governments and the people they are meant to protect.
George Omagbemi Sylvester writes from South Africa. Published by saharaweeklyng.com
news
Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration
Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration
…Calls for Accountability in Nigeria’s Grassroots Governance
LAGOS, Nigeria — A civil society coalition known as Journalists for Good Governance(JGG) has intensified public debate on transparency and accountability within Nigeria’s local government system, urging media professionals, civil society actors, and citizens to hold grassroots leaders accountable.
Speaking an event in Lagos recently, the acting chairman of the society, Comrade Bunmi Obarotimi said that despite reforms such as the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling granting financial autonomy to all 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs), systemic challenges continues to hinder effective service delivery and responsible stewardship of public funds.
“Local governments are the closest tier of government to the people — yet too often they remain the least transparent. Without civic oversight and vibrant media, promises of autonomy ring hollow.” the acting chairman said.
The Journalist for Good Governance emphasised crucial roles that journalists can play in uncovering discrepancies in council spending, flagging poor service delivery, and educating citizens on their rights. Their call comes amid wider efforts by media and civic organisations to bridge accountability gaps. The civil society initiatives had previously launched monitoring campaigns to track local government expenditures and have been quietly advocating for transparency in how public money is deployed.
The leaders of the Journalists for Good Governance (JGG) highlighted the importance of physical assessment and citizens engagement on projects to boost people’s confidence, urging local councils to adopt open data platforms and proactive information dissemination in compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. Experts say the majority of LGAs currently lack operational websites or digital portals, further limiting public scrutiny.
The Journalists for Good Governance initiative aligns with sustained advocacy by civil society groups and governance experts calling for a collective approach to strengthening democratic accountability, and has decided to engage in critical and holistic assessments of how Local Governments is being run and the impact and quality of projects they embark-on and to address deficits in transparency and public trust.
Meanwhile, some state governments have signalled support for improved community engagement. In Lagos State, authorities reiterated a commitment to enhancing community media platforms as vehicles for civic participation and accountability at the grassroots level.
The renewed spotlight on local government administration has reignited public debate over fiscal responsibility and priorities. Controversies such as the widely criticised Adamawa council chairmen’s wives trip to Istanbul — which drew public outrage for perceived misuse of public funds — underscore why watchdog groups say stronger oversight mechanisms are urgently needed at the grassroots.
Citizens and activists have welcomed the journalists’ initiative, calling for sustained media engagement that goes beyond headlines to influence policy and accountability reform.
The civic rights advocates note that real change will require robust legal frameworks, a free press, and empowered communities equipped to demand transparency at every level of governance.
As Journalists for Good Governance mobilises its members, the coming months are likely to see heightened media attention on grassroots administration — from council budgets and service delivery to the enforcement of public information laws and digital transparency initiatives.
society
Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections
Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections
Two years after the last general election, Nigerians are justified in asking a direct question: is our democracy stronger today than it was then? Democracy is not measured by how many offices a party controls or how loudly politicians speak. It is measured by integrity, accountability, and the lived experience of the people. Good Politics demands more than victory at the polls; it demands moral leadership and visible progress in the lives of citizens.
The debate over amendments to the Electoral Act should have provided an opportunity to deepen transparency and strengthen public confidence. Instead, hesitation to fully embrace reforms that safeguard credible vote transmission and accountability has fueled doubt. In a nation where electoral credibility remains fragile, any reluctance to reinforce safeguards sends the wrong signal. Good Politics stands firmly for processes that are open, fair, and beyond suspicion.
The party in power commands significant authority across the federation. With control of the presidency, many state governments, a strong presence in the National Assembly, and influence at local levels, there should be no anxiety about reforms that ensure free and fair elections. Confidence in leadership is demonstrated not by dominance, but by a willingness to subject power to scrutiny. Politics rooted in the omoluabi ethos embraces fairness, transparency, and responsibility, even when inconvenient.
This is the standard long associated with Awolowo, whose politics emphasized discipline, social welfare, education, and institutional strength. His vision was not merely about holding office, but about transforming society through principled governance. Good Politics follows that tradition. It rejects manipulation, arrogance, and the concentration of power without accountability. It insists that authority must serve the people, not itself.
Beyond electoral reforms, democracy must deliver tangible relief. Across the country, households struggle with rising prices and shrinking purchasing power. Small businesses are burdened by escalating costs. Young people search for opportunities that remain scarce. When economic hardship deepens, democracy feels abstract. Good Politics recognizes that political legitimacy is reinforced when citizens can see and feel the benefits of governance.
The concentration of power within a single political structure should translate into coordinated reform and measurable development. When it does not, questions naturally arise. Democracy weakens when dominance replaces performance. It weakens when loyalty to party eclipses loyalty to principle. The omoluabi tradition teaches that character defines leadership. Without character, authority becomes hollow.
A healthy democracy requires credible elections and compassionate governance. It requires leaders who understand that politics is a moral enterprise. Two years into this administration, many Nigerians remain uncertain about the direction of both our democratic processes and their daily welfare. If democracy is to endure, it must reflect Good Politics: fairness in competition, integrity in conduct, and compassion in governance. Anything less falls short of the standard that our history and our values demand.
news
GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA
GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA
The Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa Support Initiative (GCGMSI) has commended the Zamfara State Government for its decisive contribution to security operations through the donation of newly acquired armoured personnel carriers (APCs), surveillance drones, and other critical operational equipment to troops and security agencies in the state.
This commendation was contained in a statement signed by the Convener of the GCGMSI, Ibrahim Dahiru Danfulani, Sadaukin Garkuwan Keffi/Betara Biu, and made available to the press.
The equipment was formally commissioned on Wednesday, February 18, by the Grand Patron of the GCGMSI and Minister of Defence, General Christopher Gwabin Musa, OFR (rtd.), in a ceremony at the Government House, Gusau. The event was attended by senior military officers, heads of security agencies, and top officials of the Zamfara State Government.
The GCGMSI, in its statement, hailed the donation as a “transformative and timely intervention” that aligns perfectly with its core objective of advocating for and supporting tangible measures that enhance the operational capacity and welfare of Nigeria’s security forces. The Initiative praised Governor Dauda Lawal’s administration for moving beyond rhetoric to actionable, material support, describing the move as a “blueprint for state-level collaboration in national security.”
“The provision of these assets by the Zamfara State Government is a testament to visionary leadership and a profound commitment to the peace and stability of its people,” the GCGMSI statement read. “It represents the exact kind of synergistic partnership between state and federal authorities that the GCGMSI champions. This initiative will significantly close operational gaps, boost the confidence of our gallant troops, and send a strong message to criminal elements.”
Speaking at the commissioning, General Musa emphasized that sustained collaboration is indispensable in confronting the nation’s evolving security challenges. He specifically commended Governor Lawal for his proactive support.
“Governor Dauda Lawal has demonstrated exemplary leadership and an unwavering dedication to the security of Zamfara State,” the Defence Minister stated. “The provision of these armoured vehicles, surveillance drones, and other operational equipment will undoubtedly boost the morale and operational effectiveness of our troops and other security agencies on the ground. This is a commendable effort that should be emulated by others.”
The newly commissioned assets, which include multiple APCs and advanced surveillance drones, are expected to dramatically enhance the mobility, protection, intelligence-gathering, and rapid response capabilities of security forces, particularly in the state’s remote and difficult terrains where anti-banditry operations are ongoing.
In his remarks, Governor Lawal reiterated his administration’s steadfast commitment to being a reliable partner in the security architecture. He urged security agencies to deploy the new resources responsibly and effectively to safeguard lives and property.
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Defence, reaffirmed its commitment to continuing and deepening such partnerships with state governments across the nation to strengthen coordination and resource allocation in the collective fight against insecurity.
The GCGMSI concluded its statement by urging other state governments to take a cue from Zamfara’s “bold and pragmatic” approach, affirming that such concrete support is vital for achieving lasting peace and security across Nigeria.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
society5 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING




