Business
The many illegal acts of FUNAAB Management exposed + How they plan to extinct the Legislative arm of the Students’ Union
SAVE THE LEGISLATIVE ARM OF FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA STUDENTS’ UNION (FUNAABSU) FROM EXTINCTION
“He that stands for nothing dies for nothing”
Looking back to time and history, executives and the leadership of the Legislative arm of the Union-SRA of this regime, were to attend a leadership Conference organized by the University Management in Ekiti State between 14th and 16th Dec 2015, and the scheduled time for their departure was 13th Dec 2015. Unfortunately, the then Speaker of the SRA, Late Rt. Hon. Adelaja Fisayo died Dec 10 2015. As a result of his death, a meeting was held to postpone the Leadership Retreat as a sign of respect to the dead between the Union executives and the leadership of the Legislative arm of the Union, the President, Nnewonye Dennis (a.k.a. DENCO) insisted to go ahead with the planned trip without recourse to sympathy. This caused a friction between members of his cabinet as a few of them had decided to be in solidarity with the Legislative arm of the Union. This however led to factions between the executives, abrasion to the relationship between the executives, Legislative arm and then hostility between the Management, basically the Dean Students Affairs, Prof. Yemi Akegbejo-Samson and the Legislative arm. A walk in respect of the Late Speaker was orchestrated and led by the Vice President of the Union. This led to the Vice President being ostracized by Nnewonye Dennis and his other executives. The Dean Students Affairs, Prof. Yemi Akegbejo-Samson accused the Vice President and the leadership of the House for leading a just protest stating that they were not “loyal” to the management. He stated this majorly because they had refused to pander to his whims and caprices.
The President, Nnewonye Dennis breached a provision of the constitution according to Article 3, section 30, sub-section II that the Legislative arm of the Union “shall make final approval of all decisions taken by the SSRC as entrenched in the constitution and/or maybe referred to it by the SSRC” when he acted as an obstinate dictator by increasing the annual due without following due process. This draconian act of his created uproar, sending ripples of displeasure among FUNAABites. The breach of the provision of the Union’s constitution was supported by the Management basically the Dean student affairs, Prof. Akegbejo-Samson, an indication that the Management was against the Legislative arm of the Union. It is pertinent to note that Legislative arm had received petitions against the Union President accusing him of a myriad of atrocities. This cumulated in a suspension, giving the Legislative arm to investigate such accusations. The accusations range from; breaching of the Union constitution, and misappropriation of funds realized after an event of the Union, THE FRESHERS’ NIGHT.
In the course of the suspension of the President, the Management, basically the Dean Student Affairs Prof. Yemi Akegbejo-Samson pestered the Legislative arm of the Union and insisted that the President of the Union, Nnewonye Dennis be reinstated, the members of the Legislative arm were threatened with expulsion. The Identity cards of some honorable members of the Legislative arm of the Union were seized and some students who supported the Legislative arm were detained by the police at the order of the Suspended President, Nnewonye Dennis and the Chief Security Officer, Mr. Peter Bolarinwa.
It is a tradition that the Union will provide souvenirs for the students every year. This year, the Legislative arm of the Union approved 1.2 million Naira, at the rate of 120 Naira per souvenir (10,000 copies of books) to the welfare director, Oyelere Motunrayo (Ay welfare). He produced less than the approved quantity at a cost higher than the approved cost without informing the Legislative arm of the Union. What stirred the hornet’s nest was the fact that he produced substandard books and was a far cry from the expectation of FUNAABites.
According to the agenda of their sitting which was pasted on notice boards, the State of the Union was a major burning issue to be discussed at their sitting on 21st July, 2016. I was shocked when I got to the venue of the sitting and discovered that Prof. Yemi Akegbejo-Samson had through the security officials planned to disrupt the sitting. From enquiries, I learnt that the Speaker of the Legislative arm of the Union was in a meeting with the Dean Student Affairs, Prof. Yemi Akegbejo-Samson and the Chief Security Officer, Mr. Peter Bolarinwa in a bid to make sure the sitting will not hold. However, the honorable members of the Legislative arm of the Union had in accordance with the FUNAABSU constitution in article 4, section 37, sub-section I that “in the absence of the SPEAKER and his DEPUTY, any of the members present shall be elected as the presiding officer for the meeting” elected an honorable member of the Legislative arm to preside over the sitting. In the course of the sitting, to our utter bewilderment, a Commander of the security unit of the University had stormed the venue of the sitting with other members of the security official and aimed to seize the MACE. He was however met with stiff resistance. A pandemonium ensued between honorable members of the Legislative arm and the security officials, the commander shouting that the Legislative arm had planned to impeach “their boy” Nnewonye Dennis. They threatened that they shall make sure some of the honorable members are rusticated. They also said that the faces of some honorable members have been noted while others were beaten. If these could be done against people elected into power, worse could be done to we ordinary FUNAABites
It is pitiable that the President of the Union, Nnewonye Dennis has sold the Union to the Management for selfish reasons. It is from impeccable source that he is after getting a job from the Management after graduation. He has rendered himself a vassal of the Management to support tyranny, brutality and injustice perpetrated by the management against fellow FUNAABites. This is an SAVE OUR SOUL(SOS) call to all quarters, we are really being oppressed. Prof. Yemi Akegbejo-Samson who we call the Dean of Student Affairs has shown us that his interest is not in our welfare. He derives a lot of benefits from the Union most especially the President, and as such he is a major player in the decision making processes of the Union.
This is a clarion call to all concerned parastatals, government bodies, NGOs and security personnel to please help unjustifiable reproach on our Union, irresponsible acts of favoritism, nepotism and threats on student leaders and all. We are tired of outside influence, threats and every form of oppression!!! Kindly save our souls!!!!
Thanks
A Concerned FUNAABite
Business
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025
By femi Oyewale
Business
Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards
Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards
In celebration of the season of love, Adron Homes and Properties has announced the launch of its special Valentine campaign, “Love for Love” Promo, a customer-centric initiative designed to reward Nigerians who choose to express love through smart, lasting real estate investments.
The Love for Love Promo offers clients attractive discounts, flexible payment options, and an array of exclusive gift items, reinforcing Adron Homes’ commitment to making property ownership both rewarding and accessible. The campaign runs throughout the Valentine season and applies to the company’s wide portfolio of estates and housing projects strategically located across Nigeria.
Speaking on the promo, the company’s Managing Director, Mrs Adenike Ajobo, stated that the initiative is aimed at encouraging individuals and families to move beyond conventional Valentine gifts by investing in assets that secure their future. According to the company, love is best demonstrated through stability, legacy, and long-term value—principles that real estate ownership represents.
Under the promo structure, clients who make a payment of ₦100,000 receive cake, chocolates, and a bottle of wine, while those who pay ₦200,000 are rewarded with a Love Hamper. Payments of ₦500,000 attract a Love Hamper plus cake, and clients who pay ₦1,000,000 enjoy a choice of a Samsung phone or a Love Hamper with cake.
The rewards become increasingly premium as commitment grows. Clients who pay ₦5,000,000 receive either an iPad or an all-expenses-paid romantic getaway for a couple at one of Nigeria’s finest hotels, which includes two nights’ accommodation, special treats, and a Love Hamper. A payment of ₦10,000,000 comes with a choice of a Samsung Z Fold 7, three nights at a top-tier resort in Nigeria, or a full solar power installation.
For high-value investors, the Love for Love Promo delivers exceptional lifestyle experiences. Clients who pay ₦30,000,000 on land are rewarded with a three-night couple’s trip to Doha, Qatar, or South Africa, while purchasers of any Adron Homes house valued at ₦50,000,000 receive a double-door refrigerator.
The promo covers Adron Homes’ estates located in Lagos, Shimawa, Sagamu, Atan–Ota, Papalanto, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Osun, Ekiti, Abuja, Nasarawa, and Niger States, offering clients the opportunity to invest in fast-growing, strategically positioned communities nationwide.
Adron Homes reiterated that beyond the incentives, the campaign underscores the company’s strong reputation for secure land titles, affordable pricing, strategic locations, and a proven legacy in real estate development.
As Valentine’s Day approaches, Adron Homes encourages Nigerians at home and in the diaspora to take advantage of the Love for Love Promo to enjoy exceptional value, exclusive rewards, and the opportunity to build a future rooted in love, security, and prosperity.
Business
Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital
*Why Nigeria’s Banks Still on Shaky Ground with Big Profits, Weak Capital*
*BY BLAISE UDUNZE*
Despite the fragile 2024 economy grappling with inflation, currency volatility, and weak growth, Nigeria’s banking industry was widely portrayed as successful and strong amid triumphal headlines. The figures appeared to signal strength, resilience, and superior management as the Tier-1 banks such as Access Bank, Zenith Bank, GTBank, UBA, and First Bank of Nigeria, collectively reported profits approaching, and in some cases exceeding, N1 trillion. Surprisingly, a year later, these same banks touted as sound and solid are locked in a frenetic race to the capital markets, issuing rights offers and public placements back-to-back to meet the Central Bank of Nigeria’s N500 billion recapitalisation thresholds.
The contradiction is glaring. If Nigeria’s biggest banks are so profitable, why are they unable to internally fund their new capital requirements? Why have no fewer than 27 banks tapped the capital market in quick succession despite repeated assurances of balance-sheet robustness? And more fundamentally, what do these record profits actually say about the real health of the banking system?
The recapitalisation directive announced by the CBN in 2024 was ambitious by design. Banks with international licences were required to raise minimum capital to N500 billion by March 2026, while national and regional banks faced lower but still substantial thresholds ranging from N200 billion to N50 billion, respectively. Looking at the policy, it was sold as a modern reform meant to make banks stronger, more resilient in tough times, and better able to support major long-term economic development. In theory, strong banks should welcome such reforms. In practice, the scramble that followed has exposed uncomfortable truths about the structure of bank profitability in Nigeria.
At the heart of the inconsistency is a fundamental misunderstanding often encouraged by the banks themselves between profits and capital. Unknown to many, profitability, no matter how impressive, does not automatically translate into regulatory capital. Primarily, the CBN’s recapitalisation framework actually focuses on money paid in by shareholders when buying shares, fresh equity injected by investors over retained earnings or profits that exist mainly on paper.
This distinction matters because much of the profit surge recorded in 2024 and early 2025 was neither cash-generative nor sustainably repeatable. A significant portion of those headline banks’ profits reported actually came from foreign exchange revaluation gains following the sharp fall of the naira after exchange-rate unification. The industry witnessed that banks’ holding dollar-denominated assets their books showed bigger numbers as their balance sheets swell in naira terms, creating enormous paper profits without a corresponding improvement in underlying operational strength. These gains inflated income statements but did little to strengthen core capital, especially after the CBN barred banks from using FX revaluation gains for dividends or routine operations. In effect, banks looked richer without becoming stronger.
Beyond FX effects, Nigerian banks have increasingly relied on non-interest income fees, charges, and transaction levies to drive profitability. While this model is lucrative, it does not necessarily deepen financial intermediation or expand productive lending. High profits built on customer charges rather than loan growth offer limited support for long-term balance-sheet expansion. They also leave banks vulnerable when macroeconomic conditions shift, as is now happening.
Indeed, the recapitalisation exercise coincides with a turning point in the monetary cycle. The extraordinary conditions that supported bank earnings in 2024 and 2025 are beginning to unwind. Analysts now warn that Nigerian banks are approaching earnings reset, as net interest margins the backbone of traditional banking profitability, come under sustained pressure.
Renaissance Capital, in a January note, projects that major banks including Zenith, GTCO, Access Holdings, and UBA will struggle to deliver earnings growth in 2026 comparable to recent performance.
In a real sense, the CBN is expected to lower interest rates by 400 to 500 basis points because inflation is slowing down, and this means that banks will earn less on loans and government bonds, but they may not be able to quickly lower the interest they pay on deposits or other debts. The cash reserve requirements are still elevated, which does not earn interest; banks can’t easily increase or expand lending investments to make up for lower returns. The implications are significant. Net interest margin, the difference between what banks earn on loans and investments and what they pay on deposits, is poised to contract. Deposit competition is intensifying as lenders fight to shore up liquidity ahead of recapitalisation deadlines, pushing up funding costs. At the same time, yields on treasury bills and bonds, long a safe and lucrative haven for banks are expected to soften in a lower-rate environment. The result is a narrowing profit cushion just as banks are being asked to carry far larger equity bases.
Compounding this challenge is the fading of FX revaluation windfalls. With the naira relatively more stable in early 2026, the non-cash gains that once flattered bank earnings have largely evaporated. What remains is the less glamorous reality of core banking operations: credit risk management, cost efficiency, and genuine loan growth in a sluggish economy. In this new environment, maintaining headline profits will be far harder, even before accounting for the dilutive impact of recapitalisation.
That dilution is another underappreciated consequence of the capital rush. Massive share issuances mean that even if banks manage to sustain absolute profit levels, earnings per share and return on equity are likely to decline. Zenith, Access, UBA, and others are dramatically increasing their share counts. The same earnings pie is now being divided among many more shareholders, making individual returns leaner than during the pre-recapitalisation boom. For investors, the optics of strong profits may soon give way to the reality of weaker per-share performance.
Yet banks have pressed ahead, not only out of regulatory necessity but also strategic calculation.
During this period of recapitalization, investors are interested in the stock market with optimism, especially about bank shares, as banks are raising fresh capital, and this makes it easier to attract investments. This has become a season for the management teams to seize the moment to raise funds at relatively attractive valuations, strengthen ownership positions, and position themselves for post-recapitalisation dominance. In several cases, major shareholders and insiders have increased their stakes, as projected in the media, signalling confidence in long-term prospects even as near-term returns face pressure.
There is also a broader structural ambition at play. Well-capitalised banks can take on larger single obligor exposures, finance infrastructure projects, expand regionally, and compete more credibly with pan-African and global peers. From this perspective, recapitalisation is not merely about compliance but about reshaping the competitive hierarchy of Nigerian banking. What will be witnessed in the industry is that those who succeed will emerge larger, fewer, and more powerful. Those that fail will be forced into consolidation, retreat, or irrelevance.
For the wider economy, the outcome is ambiguous. Stronger banks with deeper capital buffers could improve systemic stability and enhance Nigeria’s ability to fund long-term development. The point is that while merging or consolidating banks may make them safer, it can also harm the market and the economy because it will reduce competition, let a few banks dominate, and encourage them to earn easy money from bonds and fees instead of funding real businesses. The truth be told, injecting more capital into the banks without complementary reforms in credit infrastructure, risk-sharing mechanisms, and fiscal discipline, isn’t enough as the aforementioned reforms are also needed.
The rush as exposed in this period, is that the moment Nigerian banks started raising new capital, the glaring reality behind their reported profits became clearer, that profits weren’t purely from good management, while the financial industry is not as sound and strong as its headline figures. The fact that trillion-naira profit banks must return repeatedly to shareholders for fresh capital is not a sign of excess strength, but of structural imbalance.
With the deadline for banks to raise new capital coming soon, by 31 March 2026, the focus has shifted from just raising N500 billion. N200 billion or N50 billion to think about the future shape and quality of Nigeria’s financial industry, or what it will actually look like afterward. Will recapitalisation mark a turning point toward deeper intermediation, lower dependence on speculative gains, and stronger support for economic growth? Or will it simply reset the numbers while leaving underlying incentives unchanged?
The answer will define the next chapter of Nigerian banking long after the capital market roadshows have ended and the profit headlines have faded.
Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
Business6 months agoBatsumi Travel CEO Lisa Sebogodi Wins Prestigious Africa Travel 100 Women Award
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING





You must be logged in to post a comment Login