society
When Order Clashes with Authority: The Stand-Off in Gaduwa
When Order Clashes with Authority: The Stand-Off in Gaduwa.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com
A Navy Lieutenant’s Moment of Integrity Against Minister Wike’s Overreach.
On Tuesday, in the dusty environs of Gaduwa District, Abuja, an incident unfolded that speaks volumes about the fault lines in Nigeria’s power architecture; between political office, military command, land-use law and impunity. The confrontation between a naval officer and Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), was more than a quarrel. It was a mirror held up to a system where uniforms and titles often overshadow legal accountability.
According to multiple reports, Wike arrived with his entourage and FCT field agents at a parcel of land designated Plot 1946. The plot is said to belong to retired Vice-Admiral Awwal Zubairu Gambo (ex–Chief of Naval Staff). The minister and his team were pressing for inspection and possible demolition of structures believed to be illegally developed in a buffer zone of the FCT master plan.
As the minister’s team attempted access, they were blocked by uniformed officers of the Nigerian Navy. A heated verbal encounter ensued between Wike and a naval officer (identified in one report as Lieutenant AM Yarima) who insisted they had “VALID DOCUMENTS” for the land; Wike scoffed, challenged the documents and refused to yield to the uniformed men’s presence.
At one juncture, Wike shouted: “You cannot use soldiers to intimidate government officials doing their job. This country cannot continue this way.”
The officer retorted, “I am an officer. I have integrity.” Wike’s response: “Shut up your mouth! Who does that? You are a big fool!” The officer maintained: “I am not a fool sir. I am acting on orders and I am a commissioned officer.”
What happened that day is ripe for analysis (not merely as a dramatic video on social media) but as an emblem of deeper structural dysfunction: land-grabbing, military impunity, politicised oversight and the erosion of rule of law.
Power, Uniform and the Rule of Law. First, let us be clear, the presence of uniformed naval officers in civilian land-use operations raises immediate questions. The military is not meant to operate as the muscle arm of land allocation or private development. When the minister demanded documentary proof of the officers’ claims, he was doing no more than insisting the law apply equally, regardless of rank. It is an axiom of good governance that “no one is above the law.”
A former UN expert on governance has written that “accountability becomes hollow if the symbols of power are exempt from legal scrutiny.” In other words: a uniform ought not to confer immunity. The officer’s invocation of “ORDERS” is the classic defence, but orders are meant to be lawful and legality cannot be assumed merely because someone holds a gun.
Wike, often combative by reputation, nonetheless tapped into a critical point: if law enforcement, urban management or land-allocation become hostage to uniformed intimidation, the public authority of civil offices is hollowed out. And when the armed forces are seen to be aligned implicitly with private interests (especially in land-rich Abuja) that signals a dangerous slide.
The Land Question: Abuja, Buffer Zones and the Master Plan. The purported land in question (Plot 1946 in Gaduwa) is described by reporting outlets as falling within a buffer zone designated by the Development and Control arm of the FCT Administration (FCTA) for non-development or restricted use.
If indeed part of a buffer zone, the claim of “LEGAL ACQUISITION” by the navy officer or the retired Chief of Naval Staff must be scrutinised thoroughly.
What we have here is the familiar Nigerian pattern: high-ranking officials or retired officers using title or influence to grab land, often in the name of “OFFICERS’ ACCOMMODATION” or similar. In many cases, civil regulators are ineffective or intimidated. The fact that the minister had to lead the push for field inspection signals systemic weakness.
The land sector in Nigeria has long been plagued by “symbiotic collusion between the state and the military/retired elites” in which the state grants belts of land, often without proper due process, to military insiders. That model undermines confidence in the system, invites rent-seeking and sharpens inequality: the uniformed class often enjoys privileges that citizens cannot access.
The Symbolism of the Confrontation. Why was this incident significant? Because it is a moment of symbolic clarity.
A naval officer refusing to stand down before a minister on a matter of land use is not merely insubordinate—it subverts the chain of accountability.
A minister demanding documentation and invoking “the government must function according to law” highlights the threat when state institutions become hostage to parallel structures of power.
The public nature of the exchange amplifies distrust. When citizens see uniforms deployed around private plots rather than national security, the social contract frays.
As governance scholar Joseph Stiglitz once observed: “When power is unchecked, it becomes the enemy of the people it is supposed to serve.” This stand-off played out like a microcosm of that truth.
The Broader Questions for Nigeria.
This incident begs some deeper questions:
Who serves whom? If a retired Chief of Naval Staff can claim land with officer-backed enforcement, where is the boundary between public office and private privilege?
What happens when the military is used for non-military tasks? Land allocation, demolition, buffer-zone patrols, all fall under civil regulation. Militarising them blurs lines of accountability.
What about the rule of law? Wike insisted: “You cannot use soldiers to intimidate government officials doing their job. This country cannot continue this way.”
SaharaWeeklyNG.com
If the FCT minister himself is being challenged in the field, what hope does the ordinary citizen have when confronting land-grabs or property infractions?
What does this signal to investors and residents? Abuja’s brand appeal depends on predictable land-use planning and enforcement. When buffer zones are breached and enforcement used selectively, the market and public faith suffer.
A Call for Institutional Reform. This episode should serve as a clarion call for reform not merely verbal grandstanding.
Clear delineation of roles: The military should not be deployed to enforce land-use or act as private bodyguards for land holders. Civil authorities must handle EVICTION, DEMOLITION, INSPECTION.
Transparent land-allocation records: The FCT Administration must publish all allocations, buffer-zone designations and the status of each parcel. Citizens must have sight of documents said to exist.
Independent oversight of land tenure: A civilian-led tribunal with authority to adjudicate disputes between municipality and military/retired elites could help restore confidence.
Accountability for abuses of power: When an officer refuses to comply with a minister’s lawful instruction (supported by statute and regulation), there must be consequences. As scholars argue, “power without accountability is tyranny dressed in uniform.”
Culture of integrity in the armed forces: The naval officer insisted “I have integrity.” But integrity alone is insufficient when it is not tied to transparency of acquisition. As scholar Francis Fukuyama puts it: “Institutions matter more than individuals, because they insulate society from the whims of powerful men.”
Closing Reflections. On that dusty Tuesday in Gaduwa, we witnessed not simply a spat between minister and naval officer; but a crucible for principles: legality versus privilege, civil oversight versus military intimidation, public service versus private entitlement. That a naval lieutenant (or an officer of whatever rank) dared to stand his ground against the FCT minister underscores how entrenched the problem has become: power bypassing process, rank discounting regulation.
As the minister thundered: “Even if you are a lieutenant general or vice admiral, it means nothing. The government must function according to law.”
SaharaWeeklyNG.com
That statement must not be reduced to rhetoric. It must become policy.
For Nigeria to mature as a state where citizens believe in the rule of law, where military service does not confer land-privilege, where ministers are not blocked by uniforms in the field, this incident must be more than viral footage. It must be a turning point.
The uniform is supposed to protect the nation (not encroach on public authority. The office-holder is supposed to enforce the law) not bend before muscle. The citizen is supposed to live in a system where justice is blind to rank. Let this episode serve as an uncomfortable but necessary mirror.
And let those watching ask: in a land where a Navy lieutenant can challenge a minister, who then safeguards the citizen from power imbalances? Until the institutions align, this will remain not a standout event, but an example of why governance in Nigeria still tilts toward the powerful rather than the just.
George Omagbemi Sylvester
SaharaWeeklyNG.com
news
Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration
Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration
…Calls for Accountability in Nigeria’s Grassroots Governance
LAGOS, Nigeria — A civil society coalition known as Journalists for Good Governance(JGG) has intensified public debate on transparency and accountability within Nigeria’s local government system, urging media professionals, civil society actors, and citizens to hold grassroots leaders accountable.
Speaking an event in Lagos recently, the acting chairman of the society, Comrade Bunmi Obarotimi said that despite reforms such as the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling granting financial autonomy to all 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs), systemic challenges continues to hinder effective service delivery and responsible stewardship of public funds.
“Local governments are the closest tier of government to the people — yet too often they remain the least transparent. Without civic oversight and vibrant media, promises of autonomy ring hollow.” the acting chairman said.
The Journalist for Good Governance emphasised crucial roles that journalists can play in uncovering discrepancies in council spending, flagging poor service delivery, and educating citizens on their rights. Their call comes amid wider efforts by media and civic organisations to bridge accountability gaps. The civil society initiatives had previously launched monitoring campaigns to track local government expenditures and have been quietly advocating for transparency in how public money is deployed.
The leaders of the Journalists for Good Governance (JGG) highlighted the importance of physical assessment and citizens engagement on projects to boost people’s confidence, urging local councils to adopt open data platforms and proactive information dissemination in compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. Experts say the majority of LGAs currently lack operational websites or digital portals, further limiting public scrutiny.
The Journalists for Good Governance initiative aligns with sustained advocacy by civil society groups and governance experts calling for a collective approach to strengthening democratic accountability, and has decided to engage in critical and holistic assessments of how Local Governments is being run and the impact and quality of projects they embark-on and to address deficits in transparency and public trust.
Meanwhile, some state governments have signalled support for improved community engagement. In Lagos State, authorities reiterated a commitment to enhancing community media platforms as vehicles for civic participation and accountability at the grassroots level.
The renewed spotlight on local government administration has reignited public debate over fiscal responsibility and priorities. Controversies such as the widely criticised Adamawa council chairmen’s wives trip to Istanbul — which drew public outrage for perceived misuse of public funds — underscore why watchdog groups say stronger oversight mechanisms are urgently needed at the grassroots.
Citizens and activists have welcomed the journalists’ initiative, calling for sustained media engagement that goes beyond headlines to influence policy and accountability reform.
The civic rights advocates note that real change will require robust legal frameworks, a free press, and empowered communities equipped to demand transparency at every level of governance.
As Journalists for Good Governance mobilises its members, the coming months are likely to see heightened media attention on grassroots administration — from council budgets and service delivery to the enforcement of public information laws and digital transparency initiatives.
society
Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections
Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections
Two years after the last general election, Nigerians are justified in asking a direct question: is our democracy stronger today than it was then? Democracy is not measured by how many offices a party controls or how loudly politicians speak. It is measured by integrity, accountability, and the lived experience of the people. Good Politics demands more than victory at the polls; it demands moral leadership and visible progress in the lives of citizens.
The debate over amendments to the Electoral Act should have provided an opportunity to deepen transparency and strengthen public confidence. Instead, hesitation to fully embrace reforms that safeguard credible vote transmission and accountability has fueled doubt. In a nation where electoral credibility remains fragile, any reluctance to reinforce safeguards sends the wrong signal. Good Politics stands firmly for processes that are open, fair, and beyond suspicion.
The party in power commands significant authority across the federation. With control of the presidency, many state governments, a strong presence in the National Assembly, and influence at local levels, there should be no anxiety about reforms that ensure free and fair elections. Confidence in leadership is demonstrated not by dominance, but by a willingness to subject power to scrutiny. Politics rooted in the omoluabi ethos embraces fairness, transparency, and responsibility, even when inconvenient.
This is the standard long associated with Awolowo, whose politics emphasized discipline, social welfare, education, and institutional strength. His vision was not merely about holding office, but about transforming society through principled governance. Good Politics follows that tradition. It rejects manipulation, arrogance, and the concentration of power without accountability. It insists that authority must serve the people, not itself.
Beyond electoral reforms, democracy must deliver tangible relief. Across the country, households struggle with rising prices and shrinking purchasing power. Small businesses are burdened by escalating costs. Young people search for opportunities that remain scarce. When economic hardship deepens, democracy feels abstract. Good Politics recognizes that political legitimacy is reinforced when citizens can see and feel the benefits of governance.
The concentration of power within a single political structure should translate into coordinated reform and measurable development. When it does not, questions naturally arise. Democracy weakens when dominance replaces performance. It weakens when loyalty to party eclipses loyalty to principle. The omoluabi tradition teaches that character defines leadership. Without character, authority becomes hollow.
A healthy democracy requires credible elections and compassionate governance. It requires leaders who understand that politics is a moral enterprise. Two years into this administration, many Nigerians remain uncertain about the direction of both our democratic processes and their daily welfare. If democracy is to endure, it must reflect Good Politics: fairness in competition, integrity in conduct, and compassion in governance. Anything less falls short of the standard that our history and our values demand.
news
GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA
GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA
The Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa Support Initiative (GCGMSI) has commended the Zamfara State Government for its decisive contribution to security operations through the donation of newly acquired armoured personnel carriers (APCs), surveillance drones, and other critical operational equipment to troops and security agencies in the state.
This commendation was contained in a statement signed by the Convener of the GCGMSI, Ibrahim Dahiru Danfulani, Sadaukin Garkuwan Keffi/Betara Biu, and made available to the press.
The equipment was formally commissioned on Wednesday, February 18, by the Grand Patron of the GCGMSI and Minister of Defence, General Christopher Gwabin Musa, OFR (rtd.), in a ceremony at the Government House, Gusau. The event was attended by senior military officers, heads of security agencies, and top officials of the Zamfara State Government.
The GCGMSI, in its statement, hailed the donation as a “transformative and timely intervention” that aligns perfectly with its core objective of advocating for and supporting tangible measures that enhance the operational capacity and welfare of Nigeria’s security forces. The Initiative praised Governor Dauda Lawal’s administration for moving beyond rhetoric to actionable, material support, describing the move as a “blueprint for state-level collaboration in national security.”
“The provision of these assets by the Zamfara State Government is a testament to visionary leadership and a profound commitment to the peace and stability of its people,” the GCGMSI statement read. “It represents the exact kind of synergistic partnership between state and federal authorities that the GCGMSI champions. This initiative will significantly close operational gaps, boost the confidence of our gallant troops, and send a strong message to criminal elements.”
Speaking at the commissioning, General Musa emphasized that sustained collaboration is indispensable in confronting the nation’s evolving security challenges. He specifically commended Governor Lawal for his proactive support.
“Governor Dauda Lawal has demonstrated exemplary leadership and an unwavering dedication to the security of Zamfara State,” the Defence Minister stated. “The provision of these armoured vehicles, surveillance drones, and other operational equipment will undoubtedly boost the morale and operational effectiveness of our troops and other security agencies on the ground. This is a commendable effort that should be emulated by others.”
The newly commissioned assets, which include multiple APCs and advanced surveillance drones, are expected to dramatically enhance the mobility, protection, intelligence-gathering, and rapid response capabilities of security forces, particularly in the state’s remote and difficult terrains where anti-banditry operations are ongoing.
In his remarks, Governor Lawal reiterated his administration’s steadfast commitment to being a reliable partner in the security architecture. He urged security agencies to deploy the new resources responsibly and effectively to safeguard lives and property.
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Defence, reaffirmed its commitment to continuing and deepening such partnerships with state governments across the nation to strengthen coordination and resource allocation in the collective fight against insecurity.
The GCGMSI concluded its statement by urging other state governments to take a cue from Zamfara’s “bold and pragmatic” approach, affirming that such concrete support is vital for achieving lasting peace and security across Nigeria.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
society5 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING




