Connect with us

society

When Silence Became Policy: The Case for Rethinking Nigeria’s Unity. By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Published

on

When Silence Became Policy: The Case for Rethinking Nigeria’s Unity. By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

When Silence Became Policy: The Case for Rethinking Nigeria’s Unity.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

“From Unheard Appeals to External Proposals. A Nation at the Crossroads”

 

Nigeria today finds itself in a swirling vortex of political discord, moral contradiction and public skepticism. a nation where appeals for peace were too often met with indifference, where allegations of mass violence were muted by the very authorities expected to respond and where leadership remained silent amid rising tensions that threatened the country’s stability. Now, when an external actor (United States Deputy Secretary of State Railey R. Moore) suggests examining Nigeria’s political architecture and even entertains the idea of PARTITION as part of long-term stability planning, the federal government swiftly denounces such proposals and pronounces empty rallies for “unity.”

 

This juxtaposition (between past silence and present outrage) has left many Nigerians questioning whether unity should be a given, or whether it must be earned through consistent justice, national integrity and equitable governance.

 

The Silence That Echoed Across the Nation. When Nigerians appealed for genuine peace amid rising violence in various regions in the past, the responses from the authorities was often either slow, ambivalent or superficial.

 

In communities across the North, cries that sounded alarm bells over what some local voices described as ethnoreligious targeting went largely unaddressed at the national level. Scholars such as Wole Soyinka have warned against dismissing local security alerts simply because they are politically inconvenient. As he has written, “Indifference to local distress today becomes the broader apathy of national character tomorrow.” Yet, the lack of proactive federal engagement only reinforced public frustration.

 

Similarly, when high-profile figures such as Turji Bello (known for militancy in parts of northern Nigeria) were reported to be implicated in violence against civilian populations, the official response was perceived by many as too muted, too slow and too politically calibrated to serve immediate optics rather than justice. For numerous Nigerians (especially those directly affected) such omissions were far from “neutral.” They were betrayals of moral responsibility.

 

At the same time, mediators like Sheikh Ahmad Gumi were sent to negotiate the release of kidnapped civilians, even as families questioned why state power was not marshaled more forcefully to protect them. The optics of negotiated settlements (and of negotiated silence) left deep emotional and political scars.

 

When leadership remains silent in the face of mounting distress, the consequences extend beyond immediate insecurity. They erode trust, which is the foundation of any cohesive nation.

 

The Railey Moore Proposal: Catalyst or Controversy? Against this backdrop comes the US diplomatic suggestion put forward by Deputy Secretary of State Railey R. Moore: a call to reassess Nigeria’s national framework and entertain dialogue on structural reforms (including federal restructuring) to better reflect the aspirations and security needs of its regions.

 

Although, before we proceed, it is crucial to state unequivocally that no credible international actor has formally called for an immediate PARTITION of Nigeria. Instead, what Moore suggested in diplomatic engagements was intellectual consideration of structural reforms and an encouragement, not an imposition. However, national spin doctors and political opportunists seized on selective framing, pronouncing it a “CALL FOR BREAKUP” and turning it into a rallying cry for nationalistic sentiment.

 

In a press statement, the Nigerian government rejected the notion of division, reaffirming commitment to national unity, though yet failed to acknowledge the HISTORICAL context that has led citizens to even consider such ideas.

 

Political scientist Professor Kunle Adebayo has stated that “Unity imposed without justice and equitable participation becomes a brittle unity, vulnerable to fracture when tested.” This reflects a fundamental political truth. Families do not hold together simply because they share geography; they stay together because they share justice, opportunity and mutual respect.

 

Unity Without Justice: A Fragile Construct. Is it not hypocritical to decry external suggestions for structural assessment when internal voices have long called for reform?

 

Nigeria’s federal structure (born at independence and modified through military and democratic transitions) has struggled to balance the tensions between centralization and regional autonomy. The creation of states, local government divisions and revenue-sharing formulas were all intended to give voice and agency to diverse ethnic, cultural and religious groups. Yet persistent governance failures have meant that many Nigerians increasingly feel excluded.

 

Economist Dr. Aisha Bello once remarked, “If a nation’s unity does not translate to shared prosperity and security, it becomes a slogan rather than a lived reality.” This point cannot be understated. When regions feel marginalized in terms of security, economic development and political representation, unity becomes an abstract ideal rather than a practical foundation.

 

The reaction to Deputy Secretary Moore’s comments reveals this tension starkly. Government representatives denounced the idea without engaging its substantive points. They invoked national pride, yet did not seize the opportunity to explain how ongoing governance reforms would address Nigerians persistent concerns.

 

For many youths, activists and regional leaders even more especially those in the Middle Belt, the South-South and certain Northern communities, the reaction smacked of performative patriotism. It was unity for optics, not unity grounded in reform.

 

Should Nigeria “Go Its Separate Ways”? Here we must be absolutely clear: Advocating for informed structural dialogue is not advocating for dissolution of the state. The question should never be about breakup or preservation alone, but it should instead focus on how Nigerians can live together justly and productively.

 

The suggestion to examine federal arrangements is not unique to Nigeria. Federal states around the world (including Canada, Spain and Belgium) have undertaken constitutional reforms to reconcile diversity with unity. These are conversations of maturity not weakness.

 

The philosophical foundation for any serious discussion about Nigeria’s structure comes from the principle that a nation must serve all its citizens equitably or it fails its own social contract. Historical grievances, economic inequalities and security asymmetries cannot be dismissed merely with patriotic slogans.

 

Reform does not equal secession. Federation does not equate to fragmentation. What it means is listening to voices that feel unheard, restructuring governance to be more inclusive and ensuring that unity is not merely a concept, but a daily practice.

 

Global Perspectives on Internal Reform. International scholars have often reinforced this point.

 

Political theorist Dr. Francis Fukuyama wrote that “nations enduring internal conflicts must be willing to reform institutions to reflect the diverse needs of their people, rigid insistence on old frameworks only deepens division.” This insight affirms that reform is not external meddling. It is modern governance.

 

Similarly, Nigerian legal scholar Professor Itse Sagay emphasized that “the sustainability of any nation is determined less by its borders and more by the justice embedded within its constitution and institutions.” This wisdom cuts to the heart of the matter: borders may hold on a map, but justice holds a people together.

 

What Nigerians Should Demand Today. If the objective is a stronger, more peaceful Nigeria, then the demands must be clear:

 

Transparent National Dialogue: Initiate open, inclusive national debates on structural reform, not in secrecy, not on social media soundbites, but through legislated frameworks that involve citizens, experts and civil society.

 

Security Recalibration: Address regional security asymmetries honestly, without denial or politicization. Communities deserve protection as a basic right not a negotiable luxury.

 

Equitable Resource Distribution: Revise revenue allocation formulas to ensure that regions contribute to and benefit from national wealth fairly, reducing perceptions of extraction without return.

 

Justice for All: Strengthen the justice system to ensure that allegations of human rights abuses (regardless of perpetrator) are investigated and adjudicated fairly.

 

Educational and Economic Opportunities: Invest in regions that have been historically marginalized. Economic inclusion is more powerful than patriotic chants.

 

Final Take: Unity Through Reform, Not Denial. Nigeria’s destiny should not be held hostage by fear of conversation. Unity that denies grievances is not unity, it is suppression. Unity that embraces justice, reform and inclusion is sustainable.

 

The reaction to Railey Moore’s proposal illustrates a critical national moment: Nigeria can either confront its challenges with honesty and courage or it can retreat into slogans that serve no one.

 

As Professor Chinua Achebe once wrote, “The trouble with Nigeria is simply and squarely a failure of leadership.” Leaders must show courage by inviting dialogue not suppressing it. Citizens must demand that unity be real not rhetorical.

 

The real question for Nigeria today is not whether citizens should accept or reject suggestions from abroad, but whether the nation has the courage to reform itself from within.

 

If Nigeria truly desires unity (not just in word, but in deed) then it must be willing to face its challenges squarely, debate structural reform openly and ensure that the promise of Nigeria is a promise kept for every Nigerian.

 

When Silence Became Policy: The Case for Rethinking Nigeria’s Unity.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

society

Adron Homes Powers Ibadan Cultural Festival, Strengthens Cultural Influence

Published

on

Adron Homes Powers Ibadan Cultural Festival, Strengthens Cultural Influence

 

Adron Homes and Properties Limited delivered a commanding performance at the grand finale of the 2026 Ibadan Cultural Festival, firmly establishing its dominance as Nigeria’s leading real estate brand. At the iconic Lekan Salami Stadium, Adamasingba, the company did not just sponsor the event, it took control of the narrative, transforming the cultural celebration into a powerful showcase of brand strength, innovation, and market authority.

 

With the presence of the Olubadan of Ibadanland, His Imperial Majesty, Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja, alongside a distinguished assembly of traditional rulers, high chiefs, and top government dignitaries, Adron Homes leveraged the high-profile platform to reinforce its influence at the intersection of culture, community, and modern development. The royal commendation from the Olubadan, who openly praised the company’s contribution, further cemented Adron’s growing stature as a key driver of cultural and socio-economic advancement.

 

Speaking at the event, the Group Managing Director, Mrs. Adenike Ajobo, projected a bold and uncompromising vision, emphasizing that Adron Homes is not just building houses but creating ecosystems where heritage, lifestyle, and modern living seamlessly converge. She reaffirmed that the company’s presence in Ibadan is strategically positioned to redefine the city’s residential landscape while embedding the brand deeply within the cultural fabric of its people.

 

Adron Homes’ activation proved to be one of the most dominant features of the festival. The “Adron Experience” zone became the epicenter of engagement, attracting massive crowds through immersive brand interactions, including the viral 360-degree video booth that drove widespread digital visibility. Simultaneously, the Ibadan Sales Team executed a results-driven engagement strategy, converting high foot traffic into real business opportunities while showcasing Adron’s expanding portfolio of modern, world-class estates transforming the city’s iconic skyline.

 

By seamlessly integrating its “Home Festival” concept into the cultural celebration, Adron Homes blurred the line between tradition and innovation, delivering an unmatched brand experience that competitors could not rival. As the festival drew to a close, one message was unmistakable, Adron Homes did not just participate; it dominated, setting a new benchmark for corporate cultural investment and reinforcing its position as the brand defining the future of real estate in Nigeria.

 

Adron Homes Powers Ibadan Cultural Festival, Strengthens Cultural Influence

Continue Reading

society

A Generation Under Siege as Nigeria’s Drug Crisis Deepens

Published

on

A Generation Under Siege as Nigeria’s Drug Crisis Deepens

BY BLAISE UDUNZE

 

This piece speaks directly to the current consciousness of many Nigerians as some crises erupt with noise, explosions of violence, economic shocks, political upheavals and then some unfold quietly, steadily, almost invisibly, until their consequences become impossible to ignore. Nigeria today is living through the latter. Today, this hardly or rarely dominates the front pages of newspapers with the same sustained urgency. Still, the truth is that it depends on whether it is reshaping communities, distorting futures, and hollowing out the very foundation of the nation’s promise.

With the rate at which drug abuse has festered among young Nigerians, it is no longer a social concern. It is a national emergency, silent, systemic, and dangerously underestimated.

The big picture of a bright future led by the youth of today and leaders of tomorrow is gradually fading away, thanks to the menace of drugs. Unfortunately, it is a national problem linked to all other criminal activities, but the system does not consider it critical. A generation of people is gradually being wiped out. The implications of these are too dire even to contemplate.

It is now alarming, as the numbers alone are staggering. Looking closely at the report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reveals that 14.4 percent of Nigerians between the ages of 15 and 64, roughly 14.3 million people, use psychoactive substances, nearly three times the global average. Even more troubling, which calls for public concern, is that one in five of these users suffers from drug-related disorders requiring urgent treatment. The implication is clear since this is not casual use; it is a deepening public health crisis.

To many Nigerians, these statistics, as revealed, appear alarming, but the underlying fact is that they are only a scratch on the surface of a much darker reality, which the eyes cannot see.

Across Lagos, Kano, Onitsha, and countless towns in between, drug abuse is no longer hidden. It is visible in motor parks where tramadol is sold as casually as bottled water, in university hostels where “home mixes” circulate as social currency, and in street corners where teenagers inhale toxic concoctions in search of escape. Substances that were once tightly regulated, codeine, opioids, and benzodiazepines, are now frighteningly accessible. Others, far more dangerous, are improvised through mixtures of gutter water, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals designed not for healing, but for oblivion.

What is emerging is not just a culture of drug use, but an ecosystem of addiction.

Let us consider the disturbing normalisation of concoctions like “Omi Gutter” (gutter water) or “Jiko”, lethal blends of tramadol, codeine, cannabis, and other substances, just to mention a few. The fear in all of this is that these are not isolated experiments; they are part of a growing subculture among young people seeking relief from pressures they can neither articulate nor escape. Let us see the irony from the point that the deaths incurred from overdoses, seizures, and organ failure are increasingly reported, yet rarely provoke sustained national outrage.

This silence is part of the problem and what society has failed to recognize is that they are yet to understand the scale of the crisis; one must go beyond the streets and into the systems that have failed to contain it.

What must be known today is that Nigeria’s drug epidemic is deeply intertwined with a mental health crisis that remains largely unaddressed, which appears difficult to deal with because the system’s attention is divided by other trivialities. According to the World Health Organization, one in four Nigerians, an estimated 50 million people, suffer from some form of mental illness. This is such a fearful trend, whilst among adolescents, the situation is even more fragile. Today to the trend in Nigeria, globally, is also on record that 14 percent of young people experience mental health challenges, with suicide ranking among the leading causes of death for those aged 15 to 29.

In Nigeria, however, these issues are compounded by stigma, neglect, and systemic absence.

A study conducted in a Borstal Institution in North-Central Nigeria found that 82.5 per cent of adolescent boys had psychiatric disorders. The breakdown actually revealed that disruptive behaviour disorders accounted for 40.8 per cent, substance use disorders 15.8 per cent, anxiety disorders 14.2 per cent, psychosis 6.7 per cent, and mood disorders five per cent. These are not marginal figures; they point to a generation grappling with profound psychological distress.

Many of these boys, according to the timely warning from Professor Olurotimi Coker of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, which he revealed, is that they suffer in silence. This, he discloses, is constrained by societal expectations that equate vulnerability with weakness. In a culture where young men are expected to “be strong,” emotional struggles are buried, not addressed. Drugs, in this context, become both refuge and rebellion, a way to cope, to escape, and sometimes, to belong.

The tragedy is that what begins as coping often ends in captivity. The clear fact, which the system must not ignore is that the crisis does not exist in isolation, yes! because it feeds into and is fed by Nigeria’s broader challenges of insecurity and alongside economic instability. Research by scholars from Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University highlights a dangerous nexus between substance abuse and national security. Drug trafficking networks do not merely distribute substances; they sustain criminal economies, fund violent groups, and perpetuate cycles of instability.

A review of some of the developments will drive us to the activities in the Lake Chad Basin, for instance, an open secret is that insurgent groups such as Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province have been linked to drug trafficking operations. According to regional security analyses, these groups rely on narcotics, from tramadol to cocaine, to finance operations, recruit fighters, and embolden combatants. The use of drugs to suppress fear and heighten aggression among fighters underscores a chilling reality, which obviously shows that Nigeria’s drug crisis is not just a health issue; it is a security threat. To confirm this, only recently, during an interview with Arise TV, General Christopher Musa, the Minister of Defence, concurred that when many of these terrorists are arrested, they are often found to be under the influence of drugs.” He stated that they use different substances, including injectables, which affect their thinking and reduce their fear or sense of pain. In General Musa’s words: “You are dealing with somebody whose mind is made up that if he dies, he doesn’t care. Most times when we arrest them, they are on drugs, so they don’t care, they don’t even feel it, they have Injectables, you get them with all those drugs. So that is how they operate.”

This convergence of addiction and violence creates a vicious cycle. History has shown that drugs fuel crime; crime sustains drug networks and for this reason, young people, caught in the middle, are both victims and instruments, recruited as couriers, enforcers, and, in some cases, political thugs. One recent example that occurred earlier this month is that of a teenager aged 15 named Tijjani. He was arrested by the Nigerian Army in connection with the Boko Haram deadly attack on military positions in Borno that claimed the life of Brigadier-General Oseni Braimah and other soldiers.

In the political space, history offers a warning because this brings to mind the scenario that played out during the 2011 post-election violence in Nigeria, which claimed over 800 lives in just three days, with the same pattern occurring in the 2023 elections. What Nigerians must know is that these trends expose how easily unemployed, disillusioned youths can be mobilized for violence. In most cases, this happens under the influence of substances and of concern is that similar patterns are re-emerging currently, raising urgent questions about the future of Nigeria’s democracy.

At the same time, economic realities continue to deepen vulnerability. Youth unemployment and underemployment remain persistently high despite the official rate currently at 5 percent, which appears to be low under the newer methodology, while the alternative estimate was around 22 percent in 2025, leaving millions in limbo today. The fact is that, regrettably, for many, the promise of education has not translated into opportunity. As a matter of fact, in many homes, degrees hang on walls, but jobs remain elusive. And that is why, in this vacuum, drugs offer something the system does not in the case of temporary relief from frustration, anxiety, and stagnation.

Even more alarming is how early exposure begins.

A quick look at some reports in Nigeria reveals that hardly any month passed in 2021 without any significant cases of vast amounts of drugs seized at the import gateways in Nigeria or a Nigerian caught abroad with a large consignment of drugs being smuggled into another country. These seizures have shed light on how the work of trafficking networks is facilitated by a range of actors, including alleged businesspeople, politicians, celebrities, and students. Nigeria’s porous borders, weak institutions, corrupt practices, political patronage, poverty, and ethnic identities enable traffickers to avoid detection by the formal security apparatus. There are even times when the conventional security apparatus itself provides cover for traffickers, giving rise to legitimate concerns about the ability of criminal networks and illicit drug monies to infiltrate security and government agencies, transform or influence the motivations of its members, reorient objectives towards the spoils of drug trafficking activity, thus undermining the democratic processes. Still on the supply side is the new availability of cheap opioids in the open market under different brands names.

In Lagos State alone, a 2024 study by the combined team of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) and the Federal Ministry of Education found an alarming fact that 13.6 per cent of secondary school students had experimented with drugs, while 6.9 per cent were active users. Unbeknownst to most Nigerians is the fact that these figures represent not just experimentation, but a pipeline into long-term dependency.

This is also confirmed by the Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), Buba Marwa, who said substance abuse had moved beyond the streets and was now a growing problem within lecture halls and campuses when he spoke on “High Today, Lost Tomorrow: The Real Cost of Drug Abuse on Campus.” Marwa, who further raised concerns over the increasing use of social media platforms for drug distribution, as well as the involvement of students in trafficking, stated that the drug scene had evolved from the use of traditional substances, like cannabis, to more dangerous synthetic opioids and designer drugs, such as Colorado, Loud, and Methamphetamine.

 

It is more fearful to know that beyond the university students, children as young as 12 are being introduced to substances not through sophisticated cartels, but through peers, neighbourhood influences, and easy market access. Drugs that require prescriptions are sold openly in markets and motor parks, often cheaper than a soft drink. A sachet of tramadol can cost as little as N100.

One surprising revelation is that some of the more dangerous substances, such as petrol fumes, glue, sewage mixtures, are used freely because they are costless. It is now understood that this is not merely a matter of accessibility, but a systemic failure.

Law enforcement efforts, while significant, remain insufficient relative to the scale of the problem as large-scale numbers of drugs have found their way into society. They can still claim to have succeeded as the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency said to have recorded notable successes, though, with over 57,000 arrests, more than 10,000 convictions, and nearly 10 million kilograms of seized drugs in recent years. Even with these records, it is glaring that society has continued to witness thousands of addicts being rehabilitated, and millions of students have been reached through advocacy campaigns.

Yet, as described earlier, these achievements, though commendable, are dwarfed by the magnitude of the crisis, which gives no room for law enforcement to make any holistic claims of sanitizing the system. Seeing the sheer volume of drug inflows, from heroin in Asia, cocaine from South America, cannabis from North Africa, and synthetic drugs from Europe, suggests a system under siege. Enforcement alone cannot outpace demand.

And demand, in Nigeria today, is expanding. Nowhere is the human cost more visible than among the homeless youth population. Along the Oshodi rail corridor in Lagos, thousands of young people live in precarious and questionable conditions, sleeping under bridges and railway platforms, exposed daily to drugs, violence, and exploitation, as they carelessly lose their lives, and some have spent years, even decades, in these environments. Sincerely, there must be this understanding that for many, addiction is both a cause and a consequence of their circumstances.

 

Some struggling segments of people in society can be linked to broader socio-economic and systemic failures that are associated with widening inequality, lack of social housing, inadequate education, and the absence of structured rehabilitation programs. Another aspect of this that can’t be left out and should be addressed expediently is that these vulnerable youths are reportedly recruited into political violence, reinforcing a dangerous cycle of neglect and exploitation, and it must be established that it has become a norm in society.

This is where the conversation must shift, from individual responsibility to systemic accountability.

Drug abuse in Nigeria is not simply about bad choices, as most people perceive it; it is about limited choices if properly looked into. Just as well said, the trend shows that it is about a young man who takes tramadol to endure the physical strain of daily labour, and continues using it long after the pain is gone because addiction has taken hold. Sometimes, it can also be about a teenager who experiments out of curiosity and eventually finds herself trapped in dependency. It is about a boy who cannot and is unable to express or confront his emotional pain, so he copes by suppressing or numbing it instead, while also looking at a society that has normalized survival at the expense of well-being.

The policy response, however, has yet to match the urgency of the crisis and with this challenge, it will be said that Nigeria lacks a fully integrated national strategy that connects drug prevention, mental health care, education reform, and economic inclusion.

The consequence is a reactive system in a crisis that demands prevention. What would a meaningful response look like?

First, it would reframe drug abuse as a public health emergency. This means prioritizing treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention alongside enforcement. Addiction must be treated as a medical condition, not merely a criminal offense.

Second, it would integrate mental health into primary healthcare. Access to counseling, therapy, and early intervention must be expanded, particularly for young people. Schools, communities, and digital platforms should become entry points for support, not just discipline.

Third, it would invest in education reform that goes beyond academics. When this is done, life skills, emotional intelligence, and drug awareness must be embedded in curricula. Students need tools to navigate pressure, not just pass exams.

Fourth, it would address economic exclusion. Job creation, vocational training, and entrepreneurship support must be scaled to match the size of Nigeria’s youth population. Opportunity is one of the most powerful antidotes to despair.

Fifth, it would strengthen community-based interventions. Families, religious institutions, and local leaders must be empowered to recognize early warning signs and provide support. Addiction is rarely an individual battle; it is a collective one.

Finally, it would demand accountability. Data must guide policy, and outcomes must be measured. Good intentions are no substitute for measurable impact.

Nigeria stands at a defining moment and must be aware that its youth population remains its greatest asset but also its greatest risk. The fear today that should be in the heart of many and must suffice as a warning is that a generation lost to addiction is not just a social tragedy; it is a national failure.

The warning signs are already here in the statistics, in the streets, in the stories that rarely make headlines. The question is whether the country is willing to listen. Because silence, in this case, is not neutrality. It is complicity.

And if this silent emergency continues unchecked, Nigeria may soon discover that what it is losing is not just its youth but its future.

Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]

Continue Reading

society

Police Track Down Suspect In Viral Defamation Case, Reaffirm Commitment To Justice

Published

on

Police Track Down Suspect In Viral Defamation Case, Reaffirm Commitment To Justice

The Nigeria Police Force has apprehended a suspect linked to a viral social media video containing serious and unsubstantiated allegations against transport union leader, Musiliu Ayinde Akinsanya.

The arrest followed a formal petition submitted by Akinsanya, popularly known as MC Oluomo, who called for a discreet and thorough investigation into what he described as a deliberate attempt to tarnish his reputation. The petition was prompted by a Facebook video circulated by one Jamiu Akinsanya, also known as Siyan, a factional member of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW). In the video, the suspect falsely alleged that MC Oluomo was involved in the murder of a pregnant woman in the Oshodi area of Lagos.

Acting swiftly, the Deputy Inspector-General of Police in charge of the Federal Intelligence Department (FID) directed an immediate investigation. Operatives of the FID Intelligence Response Team (IRT), led by CSP Kasumu Rilwan, commenced a coordinated manhunt, which culminated in the suspect’s arrest in the Ikorodu axis of Lagos State.

Police sources disclosed that upon his arrest, the suspect admitted that the allegations contained in the viral video were entirely fabricated. He reportedly expressed remorse and appealed for leniency during interrogation.

Subsequently, the FID/IRT Legal Officer, A.O. Fadipe, obtained a remand order from the Igbosere Magistrate Court to enable further investigation and facilitate the arrest of any other individuals connected to the case.

The suspect has since been remanded at the Ikoyi Correctional Centre.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending