society
Madness and Misgovernance: Nigeria’s Security Crisis and the Folly of Negotiating with Kidnappers
Madness and Misgovernance: Nigeria’s Security Crisis and the Folly of Negotiating with Kidnappers.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com
“How the Kidnapping of 177 Worshippers and the Demand for Motorcycles Expose a Nation in Peril.”
On January 18, 2026, armed militants stormed three churches in Kurmin Wali community, Kajuru Local Government Area, Kaduna State, abducting 177 worshippers, this is a shocking reminder of Nigeria’s deep-seated insecurity. Instead of demanding ransom in cash, the abductors bizarrely insisted on the return of 17 motorcycles allegedly “LOST” during recent military operations before they would negotiate the release of the captives.
This grotesque demand (seemingly trivial in monetary terms) triggers a much deeper question: How can a sovereign nation as powerful and populous as Nigeria be forced to negotiate with kidnappers, bandits and terrorists? And worse, why are these negotiations happening at all in a country that constitutionally claims the capacity and mandate to protect its citizens?
The scenes unfolding in Kaduna are not isolated anomalies. They are stark symbols of a nation unravelling under the weight of insecurity and a crisis that cripples daily life, threatens economic development and erodes trust in government institutions.
The Mechanics of Nigeria’s Kidnap Economy. Data from independent security analysts paint a chilling picture of Nigeria’s kidnapping crisis as a full-blown criminal economy. Between July 2024 and June 2025, at least 4,722 Nigerians were abducted across 997 kidnapping incidents, with factions demanding nearly ₦48 billion in ransom (of which families and victims paid more than ₦2.57 billion) and at least 762 people killed in related violence.
In many affected regions (especially northern states such as Zamfara, Kaduna and Katsina) rural communities live in fear. Farms are abandoned, schools are shut and social life disintegrates as the threat of attack penetrates everyday existence.
Kidnapping has become a refined revenue-earning strategy for armed groups, operating with impunity due to weak law enforcement, corruption and porous territorial control by the state. In some areas, officials concede that taxation and ransom have become embedded in local criminal economies.
Negotiation: A Costly and Dangerous Policy. Negotiating with kidnappers is not merely a tactical option; it has become a semi-institutionalised response, practiced by security agencies and even local government interlocutors.
Yet this is a self-defeating strategy.
As security expert Dr. Chidi Anselm Odinkalu said: “When you pay ransom or negotiate terms with kidnappers, you are effectively rewarding criminality and incentivising more violence against the very citizens the state is meant to protect.” His words echo a key security principle: criminal enterprises grow where risk is low and profit is high. Negotiations reduce risk for kidnappers and amplify the profitability of kidnapping as a business.
Nigeria is, therefore, subsidising its own insecurity.
Today’s demand for motorcycles (seemingly trivial) has exposed the moral and operational decay in Nigeria’s security leadership. What message does it send to militants when military operations dislodge them from camps only for communities to be forced into negotiation? What CONFIDENCE can victims families have in a government that bargains on behalf of kidnappers?
For families in Kurmin Wali, the trauma has been double, first in seeing loved ones taken and second in watching officials scramble for excuses rather than solutions.
The Government’s Response: Ambiguity and Deflection. Government reactions range from defensive statements to outright denial. In some cases, local leaders initially dismissed reports of abductions as “RUMOURS,” only to retract after mounting evidence and public outrage.
At the state and federal levels, security agencies intermittently claim to be battling insecurity strategically. Some reports even note tactical successes; for instance, operations by the Nigerian military recently freed 62 captives in the northwest while killing militants involved in coordinated attacks.
Yet, tactical victories notwithstanding, the broader strategic failure remains palpable. Kidnapping (for ransom or political leverage) continues unabated. Markets, schools and worship centers have been targeted repeatedly, revealing a grim reality: ordinary Nigerians are viewed as expendable pawns in a battle the state has failed to decisively win.
Is Negotiation Madness or Strategy?
Many analysts argue that negotiation is madness in the context of organised terrorism and banditry.
The former Director of Nigeria’s Defence Headquarters once admonished that negotiating with criminals transforms them into recognised power brokers. As he stated, “There is no negotiation with criminality. It only fuels further cycles of violence and undermines state authority.”
This perspective was reflected in recent defence policy discussions where the Senate declared kidnapping an act of terrorism and mulled harsher penalties, including the death sentence for such crimes.
The logic is straightforward: treating kidnappers merely as criminals to be bargained with undercuts deterrence. Instead, it builds a market for kidnapping and one that is expanding and mutating into various forms of terror and extortion.
International Ramifications.
Nigeria’s insecurity is not just a national catastrophe; it has international security implications. The country’s porous borders, interlinked regional insurgencies and the rise of violent groups in the Sahel make West Africa a hotspot for burgeoning criminal networks.
Furthermore, international businesses and investors look at Nigeria through the lens of risk. Persistent kidnappings and the government’s inability to secure citizens and property cast a long shadow on economic prospects which is discouraging foreign investment and eroding confidence in the region’s largest economy.
What Must Change: A New Paradigm of Security. End Negotiations with Criminals:
Negotiating with kidnappers has turned Nigeria into a nation of debt with emotionally, morally and financially. As security scholar Professor Alex Bello asserts: “A government that bows to criminal demands sacrifices its legitimacy and abandons its citizens.”
Strengthen Intelligence and Response:
Tactical operations must be supported by robust intelligence networks that anticipate threats and neutralise them before they escalate.
Judicial Reform:
Kidnappers operate with near impunity. Reforming the justice system to ensure swift prosecution and sentencing of kidnappers will serve as a deterrent.
Community Protection Initiatives:
Instead of leaving vulnerable communities to fend for themselves, government forces must provide real protective infrastructure and not just symbolic patrols or hollow statements.
International Partnerships:
Foreign cooperation on intelligence, training, and counterterrorism can bolster Nigeria’s capabilities, but only if anchored in accountability and transparency.
For How Long Will This Continue?
The answer depends on political will. For too long, Nigeria has tolerated negotiation as a default tactic, rationalised by fear of casualties or immediate harm. Though fear cannot be the compass of national policy. A state that negotiates with kidnappers is a state that has abdicated its responsibility to its people.
As security policy expert Dr. Farouk Umar warns: “A nation that incentivises violence by capitulating to it is laying the groundwork for its own undoing.” If the Nigerian government cannot secure its citizens, then it must answer a painful question: Is it capable of governing at all? History will not forgive those who negotiate away the dignity and safety of ordinary Nigerians.
A Defining Moment: A Call for Courage and Reform. Nigeria stands at a crossroads. The spectacle of negotiating with kidnappers is not merely a political embarrassment; it is a symptom of systemic failure. The country’s leadership must choose between appeasing criminals or reclaiming its authority.
The demand for motorcycles in exchange for human lives is more than absurd and it is an indictment of leadership that has lost its moral compass.
If Nigeria is to emerge from this dark chapter, its leaders must demonstrate courage, competence and a steadfast commitment to justice. Anything less will condemn millions of Nigerians to a future marred by fear, loss and a betrayal of the very principles upon which the nation was founded.
society
Iworo FM 96.3 Celebrates First Anniversary in Grand Style
*Iworo FM 96.3 Celebrates First Anniversary in Grand Style
Nigeria’s foremost indigenous radio station, Iworo FM 96.3, on Saturday, 7th February 2026, celebrated its first anniversary in grand style.
The event attracted several notable personalities from Iworo and its environs, including the traditional ruler, the Oniworo of Iworo-Awori Kingdom, Oba (Dr.) Oladele Friday Kosoko; the Chairman of Olorunda LCDA, Hon. Ajose Peter Kumayon; Oba of Apa kingdom, Christian and Muslim clerics, among others.
The glamorous event commenced with a session of thanksgiving to appreciate God for the success of the radio station since its establishment in 2025. The organisers acknowledged the challenges encountered along the way but expressed gratitude to God for His intervention and support in ensuring the station rose above all odds.
According to the Oba of Apa kingdom, the presence of Iworo FM has brought significant development to the environment. He stated that the station has introduced Iworo Kingdom to people beyond its immediate community and has largely placed it on the national map. He further noted the tremendous progress recorded in the station’s operations and commended the management for their foresight, which has benefited everyone in Iworo.
“Iworo FM is a good initiative that has attracted development to the community. It has placed Iworo Kingdom on the national map, all thanks to the amazing and laudable work of the management. Within one year, there has been tremendous progress in the operations of this radio station. I am glad to see the improvements and also congratulate the people of Iworo for having an investment like this,” he said.
Similarly, awards were presented to the management of the radio station by 1423 Communications in recognition of the station’s impact in the broadcasting industry.
The communication company presented awards for the Fastest Rising Indigenous Radio Station in the Badagry–Iworo axis and Best Radio Station in Breaking News Coverage Across the Interlands.
Speaking through its representative, the company explained that Iworo FM 96.3 has performed commendably well within a short period and truly deserves the accolades it has received.
“Iworo FM deserves all the accolades it is getting because it has done exceedingly well for the community and Lagos State as a whole. These awards are the result of careful observation of the station’s operations and activities. It is indeed marvellous,” the representative said.
While receiving the awards, Oba Oladele Friday Kosoko, who also serves as the Board Chairman, expressed appreciation to the communication company, noting that he would continue to remain committed to the growth of the radio station.
“We are very happy with this award. It shows that we are being watched, and to be considered for these laudable awards means a lot to us. I will continue to show commitment to this radio station and will do even more as we move forward in the coming years,” he said.
The event also featured raffle draws, during which participants won various items including fans, bags of rice, clothing materials, and other food items.
society
Digital Colonialism or Market Reality? Nigerian Media Demand Urgent Government Action on Global Tech Giants
Digital Colonialism or Market Reality? Nigerian Media Demand Urgent Government Action on Global Tech Giants
By George Omagbemi Sylvester
“Local publishers warn that unchecked dominance by foreign platforms threatens the survival of independent journalism and the nation’s control over its information ecosystem.”
Nigeria’s major media advocacy organisations have called on the Presidency and the National Assembly to urgently intervene in the country’s digital information space, warning that the dominance of global technology platforms could erode national sovereignty over public discourse and push local journalism toward collapse.
The appeal, made in Abuja in early February 2026, represents one of the most direct and coordinated demands yet from Nigerian media stakeholders for government action against what they describe as “foreign digital control” of the country’s information ecosystem.
According to reports from the capital, the groups argued that powerful global technology companies (primarily American-owned digital platforms) now control the channels through which most Nigerians access news, advertising and public information.
Their warning is stark: without urgent policy intervention, Nigeria risks surrendering both its media economy and its democratic information space to corporations that operate beyond the country’s regulatory reach.
What happened
The coalition of media-centred organisations issued a public call for government action, urging the Presidency and lawmakers to address what they described as the growing dominance of foreign digital platforms in Nigeria’s information environment.
They warned that the country could lose effective control over its public discourse if local media institutions continue to weaken while global technology companies expand their influence.
The intervention was framed as both an economic and national-interest concern, with the groups stressing that local publishers are increasingly dependent on platforms such as Google, Facebook and other global tech firms for audience reach and advertising revenue.
Where and when
The call was made in Abuja, Nigeria’s federal capital, and reported publicly in early February 2026, following consultations among major media stakeholders.
Who is involved
The report identified a coalition of leading Nigerian media-centred organisations, though it did not list all participating groups in the initial dispatch.
However, across Nigeria’s media landscape, key organisations that have repeatedly raised similar concerns in recent years include:
Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE)
Newspaper Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (NPAN)
Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria (BON)
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) in digital-rights contexts
For example, the Nigerian Guild of Editors has previously warned that financial pressures threaten the survival of news organisations, stressing that without viable media, democracy itself is weakened.
Why it happened
At the core of the dispute is the transformation of the global media economy. Over the last decade, advertising revenue (once the financial backbone of newspapers and broadcasters) has migrated to digital platforms.
These platforms now act as the primary gateways through which audiences discover news content. Yet, according to publishers, the bulk of the advertising income generated around that content flows to the platforms rather than the news organisations that produce it.
Competition inquiries in other countries illustrate the scale of the shift. In South Africa, for instance, estimates suggest that internet giants captured up to 60 percent of local advertising revenue over a decade, severely weakening traditional newsrooms.
Similarly, studies have found that platforms control over user data gives them a decisive advantage in targeted advertising, further undermining publishers’ revenue streams.
This structural imbalance, Nigerian media groups argue, is now playing out in their own country and also threatening the financial sustainability of journalism.
How the dominance works
The influence of global platforms operates through several mechanisms:
Algorithmic control:
Search engines and social media algorithms determine which news stories audiences see, often prioritising larger international outlets or sensational content over local reporting.
Advertising concentration:
Platforms collect vast amounts of user data, allowing them to dominate digital advertising markets and attract revenue that once funded newsrooms.
Traffic dependence:
Many local publishers now rely heavily on social media and search platforms for website traffic. Changes in platform policies can instantly reduce readership and income.
These dynamics, media stakeholders say, create a dependency cycle in which local journalism produces content that drives engagement on global platforms, but receives little financial return.
The Nigerian context
Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, has one of the continent’s largest digital audiences. Social media platforms are deeply embedded in everyday communication, commerce and politics.
Facebook alone is used by tens of millions of Nigerians, and for many small businesses and independent publishers it serves as a primary distribution channel.
This dominance has already triggered regulatory tensions. In 2024, Nigeria’s competition authorities imposed a $220 million fine on Meta over alleged anti-competitive practices and data-privacy violations.
The dispute escalated to the point where the company warned it might withdraw services rather than comply, highlighting the power imbalance between national regulators and global tech corporations.
Global precedents
Nigeria’s media groups are not alone in raising such concerns. Around the world, governments and publishers have taken steps to rebalance the relationship between news organisations and digital platforms.
Australia, Canada and parts of Europe have introduced laws requiring platforms to negotiate payments with publishers. South Africa’s competition authorities have also recommended financial compensation from platforms to local media houses.
These global developments have emboldened Nigerian media stakeholders to push for similar policies.
Voices from the field
Media leaders and scholars have long warned about the consequences of an economically weakened press.
Eze Anaba, President of the Nigerian Guild of Editors, recently noted that if media organisations cannot sustain their operations, the consequences extend beyond journalism itself.
He warned: “If the media cannot keep journalists employed, it cannot inform citizens and without an informed citizenry, democracy is weakened.”
International policy experts echo similar concerns. Emily Bell, director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, has argued that platforms have fundamentally reshaped the news economy, often without assuming the responsibilities traditionally borne by publishers.
She observed:
“The platforms have taken a significant share of advertising and attention while investing little in the production of journalism itself.”
Likewise, media economist Robert Picard has repeatedly warned that the collapse of advertising revenue threatens the viability of independent journalism worldwide.
“Without sustainable funding, news organisations cannot perform their essential democratic functions,” he wrote in his research on media economics.
What the media groups want
Although the full details of their proposals are still emerging, the Nigerian coalition is believed to be seeking:
Regulatory measures to ensure fair competition between local media and global platforms
Financial arrangements or compensation models for news content
Stronger enforcement of data-protection and competition laws
Policies that support the sustainability of local journalism
Their appeal to the Presidency and the National Assembly signals a push for legislative or regulatory intervention rather than voluntary agreements with tech companies.
The stakes for Nigeria
The outcome of this dispute could shape the future of Nigeria’s information ecosystem.
If local media continue to lose revenue and influence, the country risks:
Shrinking newsrooms and reduced investigative reporting
Greater dependence on foreign-owned information platforms
Increased vulnerability to misinformation and algorithmic bias
Weakening of democratic accountability
Conversely, heavy-handed regulation could also trigger unintended consequences, including service withdrawals, reduced investment or restrictions on digital innovation.
The broader struggle for digital sovereignty
Across Africa, governments and regulators are grappling with the challenge of asserting digital sovereignty while maintaining open internet ecosystems.
Competition authorities in several African countries have begun coordinating efforts to address the power of dominant digital platforms and ensure fair market conditions.
The Nigerian media groups’ appeal therefore reflects not just a domestic concern, but a continental and global struggle over who controls the digital public square.
The road ahead
For now, the ball lies with Nigeria’s political leadership. Whether the government chooses to pursue regulation, negotiation, or a hybrid approach will determine the trajectory of the country’s media sector.
What is clear, however, is that the traditional economic model of journalism has already been disrupted. The debate is no longer about whether global tech platforms wield enormous influence, but about how nations like Nigeria can adapt their laws and institutions to ensure that independent journalism survives in the digital age.
As the Abuja coalition warned, the issue is not merely commercial. It is existential—touching on the survival of local media, the integrity of public discourse and the future of democratic accountability in Africa’s most populous nation.
society
Senate Committee Commends Tinubu on Launch of National Halal Economy Strategy to Tap $7.7trn Global Market
*Senate Committee Commends Tinubu on Launch of National Halal Economy Strategy to Tap $7.7trn Global Market
The Senate Committee on Finance has commended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for launching Nigeria’s National Halal Economy Strategy, describing it as a bold and strategic move to position the country within the lucrative global halal market, estimated at $7.7 trillion.
In a statement signed by its Chairman, Senator Sani Musa, the committee praised the initiative as timely and aligned with international best practices. Several countries—including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Brazil, Thailand, and Singapore—have successfully used halal frameworks to boost manufacturing, agricultural exports, financial markets, and foreign investment.
The committee highlighted Nigeria’s strong advantages for success in this space, including its vast agricultural resources, large domestic market, youthful population, growing manufacturing sector, and expanding services industry.
It noted that the strategy fits seamlessly into the Tinubu administration’s broader economic reforms, such as boosting non-oil revenue, diversifying exports, creating jobs, supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and increasing foreign exchange earnings.
President Tinubu, represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima, officially unveiled the strategy on Thursday, February 6, 2026, at the Presidential Villa in Abuja.
The framework, developed in collaboration with Saudi Arabia’s Halal Products Development Company (HPDC) following a bilateral agreement signed in February 2025 at the Makkah Halal Forum, aims to enhance quality standards, certification processes, and competitiveness across sectors like food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, tourism, and ethical finance.
The committee described the strategy as inclusive, market-driven, and globally oriented, while fully respecting Nigeria’s diverse and pluralistic society.
It is projected to contribute significantly to the economy, with estimates suggesting it could add around $1.5 billion to Nigeria’s GDP by 2027 and unlock billions more in domestic value over the coming decade through expanded exports and investment.
Senator Musa pledged full legislative support, oversight, and cooperation to ensure smooth implementation, regulatory clarity, and long-term fiscal sustainability in the national interest.
“This decisive step reinforces Nigeria’s readiness to adopt proven international models, unlock new economic frontiers, and establish itself as a competitive player in the evolving global economy,” the statement concluded.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING
-
Business6 months agoBatsumi Travel CEO Lisa Sebogodi Wins Prestigious Africa Travel 100 Women Award










