Politics
Why Nigeria Is Failing: The Absence of a True Activist President
Published
10 minutes agoon

Why Nigeria Is Failing: The Absence of a True Activist President
By George Omagbemi Sylvester
Since gaining independence in 1960, Nigeria has struggled to fulfill the promises of democracy, good governance, and national development. Despite its wealth of human and natural resources, the country remains shackled by poverty, corruption, insecurity, and inequality. One central reason for this tragic underperformance is that Nigeria has never had a genuine natural activist as president—someone who embodies courage, truth, people-centeredness, and the dogged pursuit of justice.
An activist president is not just a politician with populist rhetoric or a reformist with half-hearted policies. A true activist president is a leader whose political journey is rooted in service, whose conscience is unshaken by power, and whose commitment to the people’s welfare overrides personal ambition. Nigeria, unfortunately, has lacked such a figure at the helm.
The Political Class: Custodians of Self-interest
Most of Nigeria’s post-independence leaders emerged from military backgrounds or elite political families, often disconnected from the struggles of everyday Nigerians. Their primary loyalty lies not with the people but with entrenched interests—godfathers, ethnic power blocs, and foreign partners. As a result, Nigeria has been governed by men who lacked the moral fire and activist instinct necessary to radically confront injustice and reform oppressive structures.
Former president Muhammadu Buhari, for example, came to power in 2015 on a wave of anti-corruption promises, yet presided over one of the most nepotistic, economically disastrous, and divisive administrations in Nigerian history. Under his watch, Nigeria became the poverty capital of the world, inflation soared, and the naira collapsed. Yet, there was no sense of urgency or moral outrage from the presidency. That is not the mark of a natural activist—it is the signature of a career politician insulated from the people’s pain.
What Activist Leadership Looks Like
To understand what Nigeria has missed, we must look at examples of real activism. Take Gani Fawehinmi, the late human rights lawyer and one of Nigeria’s most respected moral voices. Gani stood firmly against military dictatorship, corruption, and human rights abuses. He spent time in jail, faced harassment, and lost personal comforts—all for the cause of justice.
In one of his famous quotes, he said:
“The legal profession is not for those who want to make money; it is for those who want to make a difference.”
Now imagine a Gani Fawehinmi-style figure as president. Would he tolerate the mass looting of public funds? Would he watch silently as universities are shut down, as youths migrate en masse, or as politicians manipulate the constitution for selfish gain? No. His presidency would be a fight for dignity, justice, and the poor.
Another case is Fela Anikulapo Kuti, the Afrobeat legend whose music was a fearless protest against oppression. Though never a politician, Fela had more influence than many presidents. He once said:
“My people are scared of the air around them, they always have an excuse not to fight for freedom.”
Fela’s message still resonates because Nigeria’s leaders govern with fear, not freedom. Fela might not have been president, but his activist mindset is what Nigeria sorely lacks in its highest office.
Activism Today: The Uncelebrated Warriors
Modern-day activists like Aisha Yesufu, a co-founder of the Bring Back Our Girls movement, have continued this tradition. Her iconic image standing in defiance during the #EndSARS protests became a symbol of resistance.
She once remarked:
“We can no longer outsource governance. We must take responsibility. If Nigeria is bad, it is because of Nigerians who allowed it.”
Likewise, Omoyele Sowore, founder of Sahara Reporters and convener of #RevolutionNow, has faced arrest, intimidation, and ridicule for daring to speak truth to power. Though often dismissed by the political elite, his activism exposes the structural rot that elections alone cannot fix.
Sowore once said:
“Real change does not come from people in power; it comes from people who challenge power.”
The Consequences of Activist Absence
The absence of a truly activist-minded president has created a dangerous vacuum—where leadership is reduced to ceremony, governance to contracts, and power to propaganda. Nigeria’s rulers manage crises; they don’t solve them. They placate foreign donors while ignoring the dying masses at home.
Under this docile leadership, corruption has become institutionalized. Security has deteriorated to the point where terrorists and bandits operate with impunity. The youth, the very future of the country, are fleeing in droves. According to the African Polling Institute, over 70% of Nigerian youths expressed a desire to leave the country permanently. This “Japa” syndrome is not just economic—it is psychological. It reflects a deep loss of faith in the leadership.
Why PDP’s Structure Offers Hope
While no political party is perfect, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) remains the most institutionally democratic structure in Nigeria’s political space. It has internal mechanisms for accountability, broader national appeal, and a history of relatively better economic performance during its years in power.
A committed activist emerging from or supported by such a structure would have a better chance of resisting autocratic tendencies, building coalitions across regions, and enacting pro-people policies. However, such a person must not be swallowed by party interests—they must reform the system from within, not become part of the rot.
What Nigeria Needs Now
Nigeria doesn’t need another technocrat who quotes GDP figures or an ex-general who can’t inspire trust. It doesn’t need recycled political heavyweights with no ideological clarity. What Nigeria desperately needs is an activist president—someone with the fire of Gani, the boldness of Fela, the resilience of Aisha, and the courage of Sowore.
This leader must emerge from the people, not be manufactured by elite consensus. They must be driven not by the perks of office, but by the pain of the people. They must be ready to lose power if it means saving the nation.
Until Nigeria experiences such leadership, the cycle of despair will continue. Elections will come and go, but nothing will change. The problems are too deep for cosmetic solutions. We need a president who is not afraid to call Nigeria’s problems by their real names and confront them head-on.
As Martin Luther King Jr. said:
“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”
Nigeria’s leadership has been silent for too long. It is time for a voice—a bold, activist voice—to speak and lead us out of the darkness.
Related
Politics
APC Governors Visit Buhari Amid Defections, Pledge Unity and Loyalty to Party Patriarch
Published
23 hours agoon
April 8, 2025APC Governors Visit Buhari Amid Defections, Pledge Unity and Loyalty to Party Patriarch
In a high-profile show of solidarity, governors elected under the platform of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) on Monday paid a courtesy visit to former President Muhammadu Buhari at his residence in Daura, Kaduna State.
Led by the Governor of Imo State and Chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum, Hope Uzodimma, the APC governors held a closed-door meeting with Buhari, whom they described as the “father of the party.”
Speaking to journalists after the meeting, Uzodimma said the visit was meant to check on Buhari’s well-being and to express gratitude for his continued influence and guidance within the APC.
“We came to pay former President Muhammadu Buhari a courtesy visit,” Uzodimma said. “He is our father in politics and the only president the APC has produced since its formation. We are thankful to God that we met him in good health, and we had a very fruitful interaction.”
The visit comes against the backdrop of growing defections from the APC, including prominent Buhari allies such as former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai, who reportedly obtained Buhari’s blessing before defecting to the Social Democratic Party (SDP).
Mid-March also saw reports of former ministers in Buhari’s cabinet planning to move en masse to the SDP, while in Buhari’s home state of Katsina, several APC members have already crossed over.
Despite the cracks within the ruling party, Uzodimma insisted the visit symbolized unity and renewed strength within the APC, which currently boasts 21 sitting governors across the federation.
“APC remains the largest political party in Africa and we are proud of our achievements. President Buhari expressed satisfaction with the direction of the party and the leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” Uzodimma said.
Kaduna State Governor, Uba Sani, also lauded Buhari for his unwavering support for the APC and President Tinubu.
“We are happy with the way President Buhari continues to support our great party and President Tinubu. His blessings remain vital to the stability of the APC,” Sani noted.
The visit, attended by several APC governors, reportedly included discussions on internal party affairs, recent defections, and strategies to solidify the party’s base ahead of future elections.
Related
Politics
Governors vs. Grassroots: Supreme Court’s Local Government Autonomy Ruling Faces Sabotage
Published
23 hours agoon
April 8, 2025Governors vs. Grassroots: Supreme Court’s Local Government Autonomy Ruling Faces Sabotage
Nearly nine months after the Supreme Court granted full financial autonomy to Nigeria’s 774 local government areas (LGAs), implementation of the historic judgment is being quietly sabotaged—this time from within.
Investigations by The PUNCH have uncovered a deepening standoff between the Federal Government and several state governors, many of whom have allegedly resorted to intimidation, threats, and policy delays to prevent local government chairmen from opening designated Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) accounts for direct allocation payments.
“Our governor has threatened us not to open accounts with the CBN for the direct payment of our allocation,” a visibly frustrated LGA chairman from a South-East state told The PUNCH, requesting anonymity out of fear of political retaliation.
According to the Supreme Court ruling, LGAs are to receive their monthly allocations directly from the Federation Account, a long-sought step towards grassroots development and financial independence. However, several chairmen across the country claim they are being coerced into compliance with governors’ preferences—including proposals to return 50% of their allocations in exchange for the right to open the accounts.
Federal Push, State Resistance
In response to the court ruling, the Federal Government set up a high-level implementation panel, which directed the CBN to open individual accounts for all LGAs. The Accountant-General of the Federation, Attorney-General Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), and key stakeholders have also been in negotiations to iron out implementation logistics.
But The PUNCH has learned that the CBN process has been sluggish, with only Delta State LGAs having submitted full account details to date. Compounding the delays are what sources describe as “stringent requirements” from the apex bank—such as the submission of two-month bank statements—posing logistical challenges for many LGAs.
An LGA chairman in the South-West explained, “All council areas here can’t meet up with the conditions because, frankly, governors have control of the accounts. They give us whatever they feel like.”
In Benue, a chairman revealed, “They (the governors) are pushing for us to open accounts in commercial banks instead. They know once it’s the CBN, they lose access to our funds.”
Federal Silence, Fragmented Compliance
The vacuum in presidential clarity is further muddying the waters. Though governors reportedly met with President Bola Tinubu to lobby for commercial bank accounts over CBN accounts, it remains unclear where the presidency stands.
In Nasarawa, where officials claim all CBN accounts are opened, the state’s NULGE chairman, Adamu Sharhabilu, expressed frustration: “We have yet to receive direct allocations. The money is still sent to Joint State-LGA Accounts.”
Another Nasarawa chairman contradicted this optimism, blaming the Federal Government for failure to bypass state structures and send allocations directly. “We have so many accounts ready to receive the money, but they won’t send it,” he lamented.
A Patchwork of Responses Nationwide
Across the country, compliance is uneven. In Kwara, NULGE boss Seun Oyinlade said, “We’re not aware any of our 16 LGAs have opened CBN accounts. We’ll only know when funds are paid.”
In Yobe, March salaries were reportedly still paid through the Ministry of Local Government, with no trace of direct payment implementation.
In Zamfara, ALGON chairman Alhaji Samaila Moriki admitted no accounts had been opened yet, citing the need for “further instructions.”
Meanwhile, in Jigawa, ALGON chairman Prof. Abdulrahman Salim insisted the process is “progressing,” with most administrative steps completed and biometric registration pending. But a NULGE source cast doubt, warning that governors could “change the process entirely” at will.
Even in Kano, where 44 LGAs await CBN verification, no accounts have been activated. “We’ve read about it in the newspapers,” said Garko LGA chairman Saminu Garko, highlighting the information vacuum between federal institutions and local authorities.
A Standoff with National Implications
The Supreme Court ruling had sparked hope for true devolution of power, ending decades of financial strangulation of LGAs by state governments. Yet, the fierce pushback from governors now threatens to render the landmark judgment toothless.
One chairman summarized the national mood:
“What’s the point of autonomy on paper if governors still hold the purse strings?”
As grassroots development stalls, pressure is mounting on the Federal Government to enforce compliance and on the CBN to ease its procedural barriers.
But unless decisive action is taken soon, the dream of an empowered third tier of government may remain just that—a dream.
Related
Politics
Independence to Irrelevance: How Nigeria Is Now Governed in Exile
Published
2 days agoon
April 7, 2025Independence to Irrelevance: How Nigeria Is Now Governed in Exile
By George Omagbemi Sylvester
When Nigeria gained independence in 1960, there was a collective sigh of relief and pride. The shackles of colonial domination were cast off, and a new dawn beckoned with promises of self-determination, prosperity, and national dignity. But over six decades later, the hope that once inspired our founding fathers now lies buried under the rubble of poor leadership, foreign dependence, and a shocking lack of direction. Today, the bitter truth is this: Nigeria is no longer governed from Abuja, but from hotel suites and foreign palaces abroad.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is currently in France on what is being described—rather vaguely—as a “working visit,” while his Vice President, Kashim Shettima, is in Senegal for another official engagement. These frequent overseas excursions have become a defining feature of their administration. Far from isolated diplomatic efforts, they now represent a disturbing pattern: the government of Nigeria is effectively run from abroad, disconnected from the people and indifferent to the nation’s crises.
Since assuming office in May 2023, President Tinubu and Vice President Shettima have embarked on nearly 50 trips to over 30 countries, spending a combined total of nearly 200 days outside Nigeria. Countries visited include France (multiple times), the United Kingdom, the United States, Saudi Arabia, India, Qatar, Kenya, South Africa, the Netherlands, and the UAE. While some of these visits were linked to multilateral conferences or investment summits, the opacity surrounding many of the trips—especially those to France and the UK—raises serious questions. Are these truly “working visits,” or are they cleverly disguised medical vacations?
Even if we concede the need for international diplomacy and outreach, the timing, frequency, and sheer disregard for domestic issues are appalling. Nigeria today is a nation in distress. From widespread insecurity—banditry, kidnappings, assassinations—to rampant unemployment, food inflation, and a collapsing naira, the country is bleeding on all fronts. In such a moment of national crisis, one would expect a president to stay grounded, to lead from the front, not from Paris or Dubai.
What is even more infuriating is the repeated justification for these junkets: “securing foreign investment.” But must we travel cap in hand to foreign lands begging for investment? What have these trips yielded in tangible economic value? Where are the factories built, the jobs created, or the capital inflows attributed directly to these travels? Apart from the Obasanjo/Atiku administration—which famously negotiated the Paris Club debt relief and expanded the telecoms and banking sectors—what legacy of foreign investment has any administration after 2007 left behind?
Tinubu’s handlers claim his economic diplomacy is strategic, but the reality on the ground says otherwise. Foreign investors are not flocking to Nigeria. In fact, they are leaving in droves. In the past year alone, major multinational firms like Procter & Gamble, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi have either scaled down operations or exited Nigeria entirely. Why? The reasons are glaring: harsh business conditions, unpredictable policies, skyrocketing inflation, over-taxation, and a regulatory environment that chokes innovation.
According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), capital importation into Nigeria dropped by over 30% in 2023, with many investors citing insecurity, policy inconsistency, and forex instability as major deterrents. No investor wants to commit capital to a nation where there is no power, no infrastructure, and no clear plan.
Instead of chasing foreign capital abroad, why not fix the fundamentals at home? Provide power. Ensure security. Simplify taxation. Uphold the rule of law. These are the things that attract investors—not foreign handshakes and photo ops in European capitals.
Furthermore, no foreign investor will commit to a nation that cannot feed itself. Nigeria’s food crisis is spiraling out of control. Inflation on staple items has crossed 30%, and hunger now stares millions in the face. Yet, farmers cannot access their farmlands due to insecurity. What serious economic policy can ignore food security as a cornerstone of national development?
If Tinubu truly seeks to attract investment, let him start by making the country safe. Investors—local or foreign—thrive in a climate of peace and predictability. No businessman will invest in a country where kidnappers roam free, terrorists ambush highways, and the national grid collapses every other week.
It is also worth noting that Nigeria’s foreign policy has become one of aimless wandering. Where is our national interest in all these trips? What bilateral gains have we negotiated? What trade deals have been signed? What is our Africa policy? Are we leading the continent or being led? A nation of over 200 million people—Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation—should not be a diplomatic drifter without compass or credibility.
The truth is that Nigeria’s leadership under the current APC administration lacks a coherent vision. This is a government that believes in photo-ops more than policy, appearances more than substance. Leadership is not travel. Leadership is staying close to the people, understanding their pain, and crafting bold solutions that inspire hope.
But there is hope. Nigeria has not completely run out of options. One man, who played a significant role in steering Nigeria towards prosperity in the early 2000s, still stands tall with a track record that speaks louder than rhetoric. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, the Waziri of Adamawa, remains a voice of reason and a repository of experience.
Atiku was instrumental in the economic transformation witnessed during the Obasanjo years—privatizing inefficient public enterprises, attracting foreign investment, and securing international debt forgiveness. He understands governance. He understands economics. And more importantly, he understands the Nigerian people.
While others run from the nation’s problems, Atiku has consistently offered solutions. He has warned against excessive borrowing, called for restructuring, and emphasized the need for economic diversification. He is not a perfect man, but he is a prepared man—prepared to rescue Nigeria from the edge of the abyss.
It is time Nigerians looked beyond propaganda and tribal loyalty. We must rise and demand accountability, dignity, and real leadership. The presidency is not a retirement home or a travel agency. It is the most sacred responsibility in the land. Let us not continue in silence as our nation is governed remotely by absentee leaders more concerned with their comfort than our future.
Let us support leaders who live among us, feel our pain, and are willing to make the hard choices needed to reposition our country. Let us support Atiku Abubakar and others like him in their effort to recover, rebuild, and reimagine Nigeria. Our country deserves more than foreign pity—it deserves true leadership.
God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
George Omagbemi Sylvester writes from Johannesburg, South Africa.
Related
Trending
- Business6 months ago
Comprehensive Media Audit Shows Flutterwave, MTN Nigeria, and Bolt Outpacing Competitors in Media Engagement
- Politics7 months ago
Together we can make Ewekoro a better local government’ — Sikiru Adesina Urges Party Leaders, Co-contestants
- celebrity radar - gossips6 months ago
How Deji Adeyanju Secured The Release Of Speed Darlington
- Politics6 months ago
My best is yet to come’ As Ambassador Adesina ‘Lanre Ogunsola affirmed at the APC APEX body, Obafemi Owode Local Government