society
Your Office Is Not a Playground, Minister Wike: APC Demands Your Resignation and a Return to Rivers Politics
Your Office Is Not a Playground, Minister Wike: APC Demands Your Resignation and a Return to Rivers Politics.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | saharaweeklyng.com
“Why insisting that a former PDP governor serving in an APC government must choose between party loyalty or chaos is vital for democratic integrity and political sanity.”
Nigeria’s political theatre has seldom been short on drama and yet the latest salvo exchanged between the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nyesom Wike, marks something beyond ordinary political tiff. It exposes a deeper crisis of legitimacy, loyalty and constitutional order in the conduct of public office holders who straddle party lines and seek to influence the affairs of opposing party structures.
On January 5, 2026, APC National Secretary Senator Ajibola Basiru publicly demanded that Wike resign his ministerial appointment, warning that it is incompatible for him to remain in the Federal Executive Council of an APC government “and be causing confusion within any organ or structure of the party at any level.” Basiru explicitly argued that Wike “cannot bring the spirit of PDP into the APC,” and insisted that if he wishes to pursue Rivers State politics, he should leave the cabinet and do so unabashedly on his own turf.
This demand is not mere rhetoric but it is rooted in constitutional norms, political ethics and the moral imperative of democratic cohesion. What the APC’s call underscores is this: political actors cannot selectively switch roles, borrow the authority of one party to influence another, and then cry foul when restrained. Nigeria’s fragile democracy cannot endure such ambiguity.
Wike’s Dual Role: A Contradiction in Terms.
Nyesom Wike’s political resume is impressive by any measure: a former two-term governor of Rivers State and a key figure in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), he has enjoyed political survival and influence that few Nigerians have matched. Yet his current position as the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory in an APC-led government presents an inherent contradiction when he uses that platform to wade into intra-party affairs in Rivers.
Basiru’s argument is not about personal animosity. It is about political coherence and the idea that a ministerial appointee of one party should not be a ghost in the corridors of another’s leadership cockpit. As Basiru reminded the public, Wike’s support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu does not make him an APC member: “Millions of non-APC Nigerians also support Mr. President and his own is no different.”
This is an important distinction. Political support for a sitting president does not equate to party membership or allegiance. It is one thing to vote for a leader’s policy; it is another to interfere in the internal party mechanics of his political opponents while serving at the highest level of government.
This dilemma (a monopolisation of influence across political boundaries) is precisely what scholars warn against when they talk about institutional integrity. According to political scientist Dr. Samuel M. Makinde of the University of Ibadan, “The essence of party democracy is the clear demarcation of organisational structures and the autonomy of party actors. When actors blur these boundaries, they undermine internal discipline and weaken democratic competition.”
Wike’s interference in Rivers politics (particularly in the leadership tussle involving Governor Siminalayi Fubara and other party operatives) is exactly this kind of boundary-blurring. Whether one views his actions as strategic rescue or partisan sabotage, the optics are clear: a minister in an APC administration acting as though he remains the de facto leader of the Rivers PDP.
Why APC Is Right to Insist on Resignation.
Political parties are (by design) autonomous organisations. They are built on shared ideology, membership loyalty, and internal protocols. A cabinet minister, by contrast, holds executive power derived from the president and the constitution. These roles are not only different; they are structurally incompatible when fused in service of competing political ends.
Basiru’s demand for Wike’s resignation is bolstered by a fundamental principle of good governance: accountability and clarity of roles. Ministerial appointments are offices of public trust, not ethnic or party turfs to be wielded for partisan advantage. Forcing a minister to choose between serving the nation through the cabinet and pursuing state politics reduces the risk of conflicts of loyalty that derange governance.
Furthermore, Wike’s recent warning to APC leaders to “stay out of Rivers politics” (framing the state as a “no-go area”) only fuels the perception that he seeks to shield his political network from legitimate scrutiny and competition.
This kind of rhetoric does little for national unity or institutional integrity. It worsens factionalism and promotes political tribalism, conditions that weaken party structures, distort electoral democracy and stall policy progress.
In the words of Nigerian legal scholar Professor Ayo Olukotun, “Public office holders are custodians of the people’s trust, not personal fiefdoms. When they wear multiple political hats simultaneously, the risk of bias, divided loyalty, and policy incoherence rises sharply.”
PDP Spirit vs APC Structure: Beyond Semantics.
Basiru’s phrase about not allowing the “spirit of PDP” into the APC is more than political hyperbole. It hits at the heart of party identity.
A political party is not a marketplace where ideologies and loyalties are exchanged without consequence. Parties invest in their members; they build institutions; they define campaigns and governance frameworks. The APC’s rebuke stems from a refusal to accept political cross-contamination and the idea that a non-member can dictate or influence party operation under the cover of national office.
Consider this: if cabinet members can freely intervene in the business of opposing party structures, where does that leave party sovereignty? What prevents a future minister from shaping the internal affairs of another party? This is not speculative but it is a real threat to democratic fairness.
Comparative political theory warns against such encroachments. According to Professor Larry Diamond, an authority on democratic governance, “Stable democratic systems require institutional respect and boundaries. When public office holders engage in partisan manipulations beyond their mandate, it erodes confidence in both the state and party systems.”
Checks, Balances and Democratic Sanity.
Wike’s critics (including Basiru) argue that his presence in the cabinet undermines the APC’s efforts to consolidate party operations in the South-South and, by extension, Nigeria’s broader political stability. In practical terms, this shapes voter confidence, electoral strategy, and governance outcomes.
Nigeria, after all, has experienced the worst deficit of trust in institutions in decades. The ruling party cannot afford to allow perceptions of internal sabotage, or characterise legitimate partisan admonition as “interference.” Nor can a national government look on while a minister uses his office to influence sub-national party struggles.
As constitutional law expert Professor Babatunde Fagbayi succinctly puts it, “A minister wears the cloak of the nation, not of factional politics. When that cloak is used to mask partisan advantage, it betrays the public trust.”
The Road Ahead: A Moment of Reckoning for Wike.
The APC’s demand is not a personal vendetta. It is a clarion call for clarity, accountability and democratic fidelity. Nyesom Wike, as a seasoned political veteran, must recognise that his influence does not extend beyond the constitutional and ethical boundaries of the office he occupies.
If Wike genuinely seeks to contribute to Rivers politics (whether to protect his legacy, shape the 2027 contest, or unify factions) the honourable path is clear: resign his ministerial post and engage freely as a politician. Anything less is a recipe for continued conflict, fractured party structures, and further erosion of democratic norms.
When political actors refuse to choose between public office and partisan advantage, Nigeria’s democracy becomes weaker not stronger. And in a nation that has fought hard for the rule of law and institutional integrity, that is a risk too great to tolerate.
society
RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY
RESPONSIBLE RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NIGERIAN ARMY
By Brigadier General D.G. James (Rtd.)
LAGOS — A recent publication by Sahara Reporters alleging systemic corruption, the creation of “mushroom units,” inflated budgets, and operational sabotage within the Nigerian Army has sparked concern across security and public circles.
But a retired senior officer, Brigadier General D.G. James, has pushed back strongly, describing the claims as unsubstantiated, misleading, and damaging to the integrity of an institution that has borne the brunt of Nigeria’s internal security battles for over a decade.
Having served for 30 years across the North-East, North-West, and Niger Delta, the retired general said his intervention is not in defence of any individual, but of the institution itself.
Questioning Anonymous Claims
At the heart of the controversial report is a single unnamed source described as a “top military strategist.” General James argues that such anonymity, without corroborating evidence, weakens the credibility of the allegations.
“Serious claims about budgets, personnel, and logistics must be backed by verifiable documents, not vague assertions,” he said, challenging the publication to provide concrete proof, including records or sworn statements.
“Mushroom Units” or Operational Necessity?
The report’s claim that under-strength units were created to inflate budgets was also dismissed as a misunderstanding of modern counter-insurgency operations.
According to the retired officer, Nigeria’s evolving security threats — from Boko Haram and ISWAP in the North-East to banditry in the North-West and separatist tensions in the South-East, have necessitated the creation of flexible task forces and new formations.
“Operating below full strength is not evidence of corruption,” he said. “It reflects battlefield realities , casualties, redeployments, and expansion under pressure.”
Payroll and Logistics Allegations
On claims of double-counting personnel for financial gain, General James described the scenario as “logistically implausible,” citing centralized payroll systems tied to biometric verification.
He further noted that accusations of fuel diversion ignore broader structural issues within Nigeria’s budgeting system.
“Funds approved on paper are often not fully released. By the time allocations reach operational units, commanders are forced to manage limited resources,” he explained.
Reaction to Benisheik Reference
General James also condemned the report’s reference to the death of Brigadier General Oseni Braimah during an ISWAP attack in Benisheik, calling it an inappropriate attempt to link battlefield losses to alleged corruption.
“Using the death of a fallen officer to support unverified claims is deeply disrespectful,” he said.
Broader Accountability
While not dismissing the possibility of corruption in defence spending, the retired general emphasized that responsibility cannot be placed solely on the military.
He pointed to the role of the National Assembly in budget approvals and civilian institutions in oversight and prosecution.
“If there are flaws in the system, they are systemic , not exclusive to the armed forces,” he noted.
Call for Transparent Investigation
General James called for a thorough and independent investigation into the allegations, urging authorities to rely on verifiable evidence rather than media narratives.
“Let every claim be examined , but fairly, transparently, and without prejudice,” he said.
Reaffirming his lifelong loyalty to the military, the retired officer urged Nigerians to approach such reports with caution.
“Our soldiers have made enormous sacrifices in defence of this country. Allegations alone should not overshadow those realities,” he stated.
society
IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity
IGP Closes PMF Commanders’ Training, Pledges Better Welfare, Tactical Capacity
The Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Rilwan Disu, on Wednesday closed a Squadron Commanders’ Training Programme at the Police Mobile Force (PMF) Training College in Ende-Hills, Nasarawa State, vowing to strengthen leadership and operational effectiveness across the force.
At the ceremony, the IGP inspected training facilities including the simulation ground and shooting range, where he personally took part in tactical exercises. He told cadets of the Nigeria Police Academy undergoing training at the college to remain disciplined and focused, stressing that their effectiveness on the field would depend on the quality of their training.
“Resilience, professionalism, and strict adherence to human rights principles must guide your conduct,” Disu said.
Addressing the graduating squadron commanders, he urged them to apply their newly acquired skills in leadership, operational discipline, and tactical efficiency. He described the PMF as a “highly disciplined, responsive, and reliable tactical arm” of the Nigeria Police Force.
The IGP further reaffirmed his commitment to improving officers’ welfare and boosting operational capacity, assuring that formations would be adequately equipped to tackle evolving security challenges nationwide.
society
Oyo 2027: Ajadi Secures Oke-Ogun PDP Backing, Holds Closed-Door Talks with Samuel Adejumobi (Agbarapo)
Oyo 2027: Ajadi Secures Oke-Ogun PDP Backing, Holds Closed-Door Talks with Samuel Adejumobi (Agbarapo)
Stakeholders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the Oke-Ogun zone of Oyo State on Tuesday received a leading governorship aspirant, Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo, in Saki, pledging political backing for his ambition ahead of the party’s primaries.
The stakeholders’ meeting, held at Saki City Hall, drew party leaders, community figures, and grassroots mobilisers from across the zone, reflecting the growing momentum surrounding Ajadi’s consultations across the state.
Addressing party faithful, Ajadi reiterated his commitment to building on the achievements of the current administration led by Governor Seyi Makinde, noting that continuity and expansion of ongoing projects would form the cornerstone of his policy direction.
“I will leverage the developmental strides of the present administration and ensure that their impact is extended to more communities across the state. Governance must be progressive, not disruptive,” Ajadi stated.
He outlined key areas of focus, including workers’ welfare and pension administration, promising a disciplined financial structure that guarantees prompt salary payments.
“Our workers deserve dignity and certainty. Salaries will be paid on or before the 25th of every month, and our retirees will receive improved attention. A government that neglects its workforce cannot deliver sustainable development,” he added.
Ajadi also disclosed plans for extensive grassroots engagement across all 33 local government areas of the state, aimed at identifying peculiar needs and integrating them into policy formulation.
“This is not just about ambition; it is about understanding the people. I will be embarking on a statewide tour to listen, learn, and design policies that reflect the realities at the grassroots,” he said.
Party leaders and stakeholders from Saki West and the wider Oke-Ogun zone pledged their support for Ajadi, citing his accessibility, philanthropic engagements, and perceived capacity to lead the state. Among those who spoke were Alhaji Rasak Aderele (popularly known as Super), Adeleke Thomas (Baba Elepo), and Hon. Coach Kehinde Adetola, who described him as a unifying figure capable of strengthening the PDP’s electoral chances.
Addressing concerns about internal party dynamics, Ajadi reaffirmed his loyalty to the PDP, dismissing speculation about a possible defection.
“I remain committed to the PDP. This is my party, and I believe in its vision. My focus is on securing the mandate of our members through consultations and consensus-building,” he said.
Shortly after the stakeholders’ engagement, Ajadi proceeded to a closed-door strategic meeting with a fellow PDP gubernatorial aspirant, Samuel Ademola Adejumobi, popularly known as “Agbarapo.”
Adejumobi, a prominent political figure from Atisbo Local Government Area in the Oke-Ogun zone, is a former Majority Leader of the Oyo State House of Assembly and currently serves as Special Adviser on Legislative Matters to Governor Makinde. The meeting, held indoors away from the larger gathering, was seen as part of ongoing consultations and alignment efforts among aspirants within the party.
Observers note that such high-level engagements signal a strategic attempt to foster unity and strengthen internal cohesion ahead of the PDP governorship primaries.
With growing grassroots support and intensified consultations across Oke-Ogun and beyond, Ajadi’s political activities continue to gather pace, positioning him as a formidable contender in the race for the party’s ticket.
-
news4 months agoWHO REALLY OWNS MONIEPOINT? The $290 Million Deal That Sold Nigeria’s Top Fintech to Foreign Interests
-
celebrity radar - gossips3 months agoDr. Chris Okafor Returns with Power and Fire of the Spirit -Mounts Grace Nation Altar with Fresh Anointing and Restoration Grace on February 1, 2026
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoEnd of an Era: Nigeria Mourns Evangelist Dr. Uma Ukpai, 80
-
celebrity radar - gossips4 months agoProphet Kingsley Aitafo Releases 2026 Prophecy: ‘Nigeria Will Rise, but the World Must Prepare for Turbulence’










