Business
An account of the Alleged mind-blowing corruption of ex- NDLEA boss Ahmadu Giade
NDLEA official petitions Buhari
*Alleges fresh plot to abduct Senator Kashamu
A top official of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), Paul Audu, a lawyer, has written a petition to President Muhammadu Buhari.
In the petition, Barrister Audu urged him to order an investigation into alleged atrocities committed by the former Chairman/Chief Executive of the Agency, Alhaji Ahmadu Giade during his 10-year tenure.
The petition was titled “A Call for Investigation of Allegations of Corrupt Practices and Clandestine Activities of Alhaji Ahmadu Giade (Former NDLEA Chairman/Chief Executive), dated 28th March, 2016.
[Audu is a Chief Superintendent of Narcotics.]
He said he was constrained to send the petition to the President because no action was taken on an earlier one he sent to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice in December, 2015.
Specifically, he said the petition was received in the Office of the AGF on the 11th of December, 2015.
In the earlier petition dated December 1, 2015, Audu had alleged, among others, that Giade embezzled the sum of Five Hundred Million Naira (N500, 000,000.00).
That being the fund remitted to the Agency by the Federal Government of Nigeria in 2008 for the purpose of carrying out Drug Demand Reduction enlightenment campaign.
The campaign was aimed at reducing and discouraging illicit drug business and consumption in Nigeria.
He also accused Giade of converting to personal use the sum of Sixteen Million Naira (N16,000,000.00).
The said sum was the balance of the sum of Thirty Four Million Naira (N34,000,000.00) remitted to the Agency (NDLEA) by National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA).
It was earmarked for the training of its staff at the NDLEA Academy, Jos, Plateau State.
The petitioner also urged the President to order the relevant anti-graft agencies to probe how Giade allegedly doubled for himself the estacode due to him.
It doubled from Five Hundred and Fifty Dollars per night ($550.00) to One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per night for all the foreign trips embarked upon by him during his headship of the Agency.
The former NDLEA boss was further accused of corruptly enriching himself with the sum of One Billion, Five Hundred Thousand Naira (N1.5billion).
That was the fund remitted to the Agency in 2014 as Intervention Fund by the Federal Government.
Giade was also said to have allegedly misappropriated the sum of Nine Hundred Million Naira (N900, 000,000).
The said sum was realized through the Agency’s recruitment portals.
He made applicants for the Agency’s job to pay the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Naira (N1, 500.00) as application/access fees.
According to Audu, the Area Commander of Gada Area Command in Sokoto State, he realized the said amount without offering them jobs.
Audu further alleged that contrary to Giade’s term of employment on the 24th November, 2005, for a term of 4 years, he (Giade) stayed in office for six (6) more years without valid renewal of his tenure.
“[He] thereby fraudulently occupied the said office for a period of 10 years (i.e. from 24th November, 2005 to 24th November, 2015) during which he was remunerated with tax payers’ money and thereby conferred unfair advantage on himself.”
The petitioner alleged further that Giade flagrantly disobeyed a superior circular from a constituted authority to wit;
The Federal Civil Service Commission with Ref. no; FC.6243/S.1/XVIII/5 dated 28th May, 2010 and received in his office on 7th June, 2010.
He, however, deliberately refused/failed to promote the staff/officers of the Agency already due or in arrears of promotion on or before 30th of November, 2010, as directed in the said circular.
He, therefore, stagnated several officers of the Agency for upward of six to 10 years or more.
Audu also accused the former Narcotics czar of stealing the sum of One Billion, Five Hundred Million Naira (N1.5b).
That was the fund remitted to the Agency between October, 2014 and March, 2015, by the Federal Government to be disbursed to officers of the Agency for the March and April, 2015 general elections.
The petitioner accused Giade of compromising national security.
This he did by collaborating with and permitting the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Office of the United States of America to install surveillance/intelligence gathering gadgets.
Said gadgets were installed at Nigerian International Airports and the Agency’s national headquarters, Ikoyi, Lagos, under US officials’ control and management.
Through those gadgets, they directly spy over Nigeria territory and our military formations within the areas of coverage, including the Nigerian Air Force Base, Ikeja, Lagos.
They continuously gather intelligence on Nigeria to the detriment of the Federal Government.
In the latest petition to President Buhari, Audu quipped, “The question then is: since those gadgets do not and cannot detect drugs, what then could be the motive for installing them?
“The motive obviously cannot be far from espionage. Can Nigeria do this in America? Certainly not!
“We must be able to strike a balance between foreign aid and our national security which must be held sacrosanct, inviolable and non-negotiable as a sovereign nation.”
Audu alleged that “Giade’s lawlessness and disobedience for the rule of law and court orders have no boundary.
“The dramo-hypocritical and orchestrated invasion of the premises of Senator Kashamu in May, 2015 cannot be forgotten in a hurry.
“I am very much aware that the Agency had previously sent some of its very senior officers to London to give evidence in Buruji Kashamu’s favour.
“[They] equally deposed to affidavit in his favour at the Federal High Court, Lagos in 2002 and 2013 respectively (i.e. under Giade’s administration).
“So, how can we now reasonably explain the sudden dramatic twist ignited by Giade against the same Kashamu soon after your victory at the poll?”
The top NDLEA official more or less confirmed the recent alarm raised by the Senator representing Ogun East Senatorial District of Ogun State, Buruji Kashamu.
Kashamu had alleged that Giade and some powerful persons were planning to abduct him and forcibly take him to the U.S.
“However, I recently read of the alarm raised by Senator Kashamu about yet another attempt by Giade to abduct him’
“[That] made him to sue the AGF, NDLEA and Giade, and also petitioned the National Assembly.
“Knowing Giade’s predilection for illegalities, this might not be unfounded.
“Information is rife now again within the Agency about such planned abduction in another form by Giade, in collaboration with US Embassy officials in Nigeria and DEA agents.”
Audu commended President Buhari’s anti-corruption war “more so that it leaves no room for sacred cows, and Alhaji Ahmadu Giade must not be an exception”.
He faulted the appointment of Giade as Special Assistant to the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice.
He wondering what such “a lawless fellow” was doing in the office of the Chief Law Officer of the Federation.
In conclusion, the operative said, “All the criminal allegations contained in the attached Appendix A against him are evidently verifiable.
“Giade should be asked to step aside from his position and referred to the appropriate Agency for investigation in order to establish the veracity or otherwise of the allegations against him.
“Even if it is for the sake of restoring order to the system and recovering the stupendous public funds looted by him.”
Recapitalisation Without Transformation is a Risk Nigeria Cannot Afford
BY BLAISE UDUNZE
In barely two weeks, Nigeria’s banking sector will once again be at a historic turning point. As the deadline for the latest recapitalisation exercise approaches on March 31, 2026, with no fewer than 31 banks having met the new capital rule, leaving out two that are reportedly awaiting verification. As exercise progresses and draws to an end, policymakers are optimistic that stronger banks will anchor financial stability and support the country’s ambition of building a $1 trillion economy.
The reform, driven by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under Governor Olayemi Cardoso, requires banks to significantly raise their capital thresholds, which are set at N500 billion for international banks, N200 billion for national banks, and N50 billion for regional lenders. According to the apex bank, 33 banks have already tapped the capital market through rights issues and public offerings; collectively, the total verified and approved capital raised by the banks amounts to N4.05 trillion.
No doubt, at first glance, the strategy definitely appears straightforward with the idea that bigger capital means stronger banks, and stronger banks should finance economic growth. But history offers a cautionary reminder that capital alone does not guarantee resilience, as it would be recalled that Nigeria has travelled this road before.
During the 2004-2005 consolidation led by former CBN Governor Charles Soludo, the number of banks in the country shrank dramatically from 89 to 25. The reform created larger institutions that were celebrated as national champions. The truth is that Nigeria has been here before because, despite all said and done, barely five years later, the banking system plunged into crisis, forcing regulatory intervention, bailouts, and the creation of the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) to absorb toxic assets.
The lesson from that experience is simple in the sense that recapitalisation without structural reform only postpones deeper problems.
Today, as banks race to meet the new capital thresholds, the real question is not how much capital has been raised but whether the reform will transform the fundamentals of Nigerian banking. The underlying fact is that if the exercise merely inflates balance sheets without addressing deeper vulnerabilities, Nigeria risks repeating a familiar cycle of apparent stability followed by systemic stress, as the resultant effect will be distressed banks less capable of bringing the economy out of the woods.
The real measure of success is far simpler. That is to say, stronger banks must stimulate economic productivity, stabilise the financial system, and expand access to credit for businesses and households. Anything less will amount to a missed opportunity.
One of the most critical issues surrounding the recapitalisation drive is the quality of the capital being raised.
Nigeria’s banking sector has reportedly secured more than N4.5 trillion in new capital commitments across different categories of banks. No doubt, on paper, these numbers may appear impressive. Going by the trends of events in Nigeria’s economy, numbers alone can be deceptive.
Past recapitalisation cycles revealed troubling practices, whereby funds raised through related-party transactions, borrowed money disguised as equity, or complex financial arrangements that recycled risks back into the banking system. If such practices resurface, recapitalisation becomes little more than an accounting exercise.
To avert a repeat of failure, the CBN must therefore ensure that every naira raised represents genuine, loss-absorbing capital. Transparency around capital sources, ownership structures, and funding arrangements must be non-negotiable. Without credible capital, balance sheet strength becomes an illusion that will make every recapitalization exercise futile.
In financial systems, credibility is itself a form of capital. If there is one recurring factor behind banking crises in Nigeria, it is corporate governance failure.
Many past collapses were not triggered by global shocks but by insider lending, weak board oversight, excessive executive power, and poor risk culture. Recapitalisation provides regulators with a rare opportunity to reset governance standards across the industry.
Boards must be independent not only in structure but also in substance. Risk committees must be empowered to challenge executive decisions. Insider lending rules must be enforced without compromise because, over the years, they have proven to be an anathema against the stability of the financial sector. The stakes are high.
When governance fails, fresh capital can quickly become fresh fuel for old excesses. Without governance reform, recapitalisation risks reinforcing the very weaknesses it seeks to eliminate.
Another structural vulnerability lies in Nigeria’s increasing amount of non-performing loans (NPLs), which recently caused the CBN to raise concerns, as Nigeria experiences a rise in bad loans threatening banking stability.
Industry data suggests that the banking sector’s NPL ratio has climbed above the prudential benchmark of 5 percent, reaching roughly 7 percent in recent assessments. Many of these troubled loans are concentrated in sectors such as oil and gas, power, and government-linked infrastructure projects, alongside other factors such as FX instability, high interest rates, and the withdrawal of Covid-era forbearance, which threaten bank stability.
While regulatory forbearance has helped maintain short-term stability, it has also obscured deeper asset-quality concerns. A credible recapitalisation process must confront this reality directly.
Loan classification standards must reflect economic truth rather than regulatory convenience. Banks should not carry impaired assets indefinitely while presenting healthy balance sheets to investors and depositors.
Transparency about asset quality strengthens trust. Concealment destroys it. Few forces have disrupted Nigerian bank balance sheets in recent years as severely as exchange-rate volatility.
Many banks still operate with significant foreign exchange mismatches, borrowing short-term in foreign currencies while lending long-term to clients earning revenues in naira. When the naira depreciates sharply, these mismatches can erode capital faster than any credit loss.
Recapitalisation must therefore be accompanied by stricter supervision of foreign exchange exposure, as this part calls for the regulator to heighten its supervision. Banks should be required to disclose currency risks more transparently and undergo rigorous stress testing at intervals that assume adverse currency scenarios rather than best-case outcomes. In a structurally import-dependent economy, ignoring FX risk is no longer an option.
Nigeria’s banking system has long been characterised by excessive concentration in a few sectors and corporate clients, which calls for adequate monitoring and the need to be addressed quickly for the recapitalization drive to yield maximum results.
Growth in most advanced economies comes from the small and medium-sized enterprises that are well-funded. Anything short of this undermines it, since the concentration of huge loans to large oil and gas companies, government-related entities, and major conglomerates absorbs a disproportionate share of bank lending. This has continued to pose a major threat to the system, as the case is with small and medium-sized enterprises, the backbone of job creation, which remain chronically underfinanced. This imbalance weakens the economy.
Recapitalisation should therefore be tied to policies that encourage credit diversification and risk-sharing mechanisms that allow banks to lend more confidently to productive sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and technology rather than investing their funds into the government’s securities. Bigger banks that remain narrowly exposed do not strengthen the economy. They amplify its fragilities.
Nigeria’s macroeconomic conditions, which are its broad economic settings, are defined by frequent and sometimes sharp changes or instability rather than stability.
Inflation shocks, interest-rate swings, fiscal pressures, and currency adjustments are not rare disruptions; but they have now become a normal part of the economic environment. Despite all these adverse factors, many banks still operate risk models that assume relative stability. Perhaps unbeknownst to the stakeholders, this disconnect is dangerous.
Owing to possible shocks, and when banks increase their capital (recapitalization), it is required that banks adopt more sophisticated risk-management frameworks capable of withstanding severe economic scenarios, with the expectation that stronger banks should also have stronger systems to manage risks and survive economic crises. In Nigeria today, every financial institution’s stress testing must be performed in the face of the economy facing severe shocks like currency depreciation, sovereign debt pressures, and sudden interest-rate spikes.
Risk management should evolve from a compliance obligation into a strategic discipline embedded in every lending decision.
Public confidence in the banking system depends heavily on credible financial reporting.
Investors, analysts, and depositors need to be able to understand banks’ true financial positions without navigating non-transparent disclosures or creative accounting practices, which means the industry must be liberated to an extent that gives room for access to information.
Recapitalisation provides an opportunity to strengthen the enforcement of international financial reporting standards, enhance audit quality, and require clearer disclosure of capital adequacy, asset quality, and related-party transactions. Transparency should not be feared. It is the foundation of trust.
One thing that must be corrected is that while recapitalisation often focuses on financial metrics, the banking sector ultimately runs on human capital.
Another fearful aspect of this exercise for the economy is that consolidation and mergers triggered by the reform could lead to workforce disruptions if not carefully managed. Job losses, casualisation, and declining staff morale can weaken institutional culture and productivity. Strong banks are built by strong people.
If recapitalisation strengthens balance sheets while destabilising the workforce that powers the system, the reform risks undermining its own economic objectives. Human capital stability must therefore form part of the broader reform strategy.
Doubtless, another emerging shift in Nigeria’s financial landscape is the rise of digital financial platforms that are increasingly changing how people access and use money in Nigeria.
Millions of Nigerians are increasingly relying on fintech platforms for payments, microloans, and everyday financial transactions. One of the advantages it offers, is that these services often deliver faster and more user-friendly experiences than traditional banks. While innovation is welcome, it raises important questions about the future structure of financial intermediation.
The point here is that the moment traditional banks retreat from retail banking while fintech platforms dominate customer interactions, systemic liquidity and regulatory oversight could become fragmented.
The CBN must see to it that the recapitalised banks must therefore invest aggressively in digital infrastructure, cybersecurity, and customer experience, while cutting down costs on all less critical areas in the industry.
Nigerians should feel the benefits of recapitalisation not only in stronger balance sheets but also in faster apps, reliable payment systems, and responsive customer service.
As banks grow larger through recapitalisation and consolidation, a new challenge emerges via systemic concentration.
Nigeria’s largest banks already control a significant share of industry assets. Further consolidation could deepen the divide between dominant institutions and smaller players. This creates the risk of “too-big-to-fail” banks whose collapse could threaten the entire financial system.
To address this risk, regulators must strengthen resolution frameworks that allow distressed banks to fail without triggering systemic panic, their collapse does not damage the whole financial system, and do not require taxpayer-funded bailouts to forestall similar mistakes that occurred with the liquidation of Heritage Bank. Market discipline depends on credible failure mechanisms.
It must be understood that Nigeria’s banking recapitalisation is not merely a financial exercise or, better still, increasing banks’ capital. It is a rare opportunity to rebuild trust, strengthen governance, and reposition the financial system as a true engine of economic development.
One fact is that if the reform focuses only on capital numbers, the country risks repeating a familiar pattern of churning out impressive balance sheets followed by another cycle of crisis.
But the actors in this exercise must ensure that the recapitalisation addresses governance failures, asset quality concerns, risk management weaknesses, and transparency gaps; and the moment this is done, the banking sector could emerge stronger and more resilient.
Nigeria does not simply need bigger banks. It needs better banks, institutions capable of financing innovation, supporting entrepreneurs, and building economic opportunity for millions of citizens.
The true capital of any banking system is not just money. It is trust. And whether this recapitalisation ultimately succeeds will depend on whether Nigerians see that trust reflected not only in financial statements but in the everyday experience of saving, borrowing, and investing in the economy. Only then will bigger banks translate into a stronger nation.
Blaise, a journalist and PR professional, writes from Lagos and can be reached via: [email protected]
FirstBank Makes Home Ownership Possible for Nigerians with Single-Digit Interest Rate Loan
For millions of Nigerians, homeownership has long felt like an ambition deferred. Squeezed by rising property prices, persistent double-digit inflation and high commercial lending rates, the dream of owning a home has remained just that – a dream.
But that narrative is quietly changing. Thanks to FirstBank.
The N1 Trillion Intervention Reshaping Access
In partnership with the Ministry of Finance Incorporated Real Estate Investment Fund (MREIF), FirstBank has unveiled a mortgage opportunity that could redefine access to housing finance in Nigeria.
Backed by the Federal Government’s N1trillion mortgage fund, the initiative is designed to empower Nigerians with affordable, long-term credit to own their homes.
9.75% Interest Rate in a 30% Lending Environment
MREIF is priced at 9.75% per annum, dramatically lower than prevailing commercial loan rates. Eligible Nigerians can access up to N100 million and repay within 20 years. This translates into significantly more manageable monthly repayments and greater long-term financial stability.
Built for Salary Earners, Entrepreneurs and the Diaspora
The MREIF mortgage facility has been structured to be inclusive. It is available to salary account holders, business owners and diaspora customers. Whether you are a young professional aiming to exit the rent cycle, an entrepreneur building generational stability, or you’re a Nigerian abroad looking to secure assets locally, the product opens a pathway that has historically been out of reach for many.
Taking the First Step
For those who have been waiting for the right time, this is definitely it. The question is no longer whether homeownership is possible. The real question is: will you act before the window narrows?
Visit https://www.firstbanknigeria.com/personal/loans/mreif-home-loan/ and in no time you could be the latest homeowner in town.
Alpha Morgan Bank Deepens Presence in Abuja with New Branch in Utako
Marking another milestone in its expansion drive, Alpha Morgan Bank has opened a new branch in Utako, Abuja, reinforcing its strategy of building closer institutional ties within key business communities and bringing its financial expertise closer to individuals, and enterprises driving the city’s growth.
The new branch, located at Plot 1121 Obafemi Awolowo Way, Utako, Abuja is strategically positioned to serve individuals, entrepreneurs, and corporate clients within Utako and surrounding districts.
The expansion follows the Bank’s recently concluded Economic Review Webinar held in February 2026, as the bank continues to position as a thought-leader in the financial services industry.
Speaking on the opening, Ade Buraimo, Managing Director of Alpha Morgan Bank, said the move underscores the Bank’s commitment to accessibility and service excellence.
“Proximity matters in banking. As communities grow and commercial activity expands, financial institutions also evolve to meet customers where they are. The Utako Branch allows us to deliver our services to people in that community efficiently while maintaining the high standards our customers expect,”
The Utako location will provide a full suite of retail and corporate banking services, including account opening, deposits, transfers, business banking solutions, and financial advisory support.
Customers and members of the public are invited to visit the new Utako Branch to experience the Bank’s approach to satisfying banking.
-
society6 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
news3 months agoWHO REALLY OWNS MONIEPOINT? The $290 Million Deal That Sold Nigeria’s Top Fintech to Foreign Interests
-
society6 months ago“You Are Never Without Help” – Pastor Gebhardt Berndt Inspires Hope Through Empower Church (Video)
-
Business7 months agoGTCO increases GTBank’s Paid-Up Capital to ₦504 Billion
You must be logged in to post a comment Login