Politics
Democracy in the Crosshairs: How Nigeria’s Ruling APC Weaponises Power and Silences Dissent
Democracy in the Crosshairs: How Nigeria’s Ruling APC Weaponises Power and Silences Dissent.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com
“Tinubu’s Government, the EFCC and the Strategic Undermining of Opposition Governors”.
In a striking indictment of Nigeria’s current political reality, Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State declared that “you cannot speak truth to power in this dispensation”, directly accusing the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of intolerance for dissent and an erosion of democratic norms.
Makinde’s remarks (made during a public event in Ibadan on January 25, 2026) were more than a local governor’s lament. They crystallised a mounting national frustration: that Nigeria’s political landscape has tilted dangerously toward executive overreach, institutional capture and political engineering.
This narrative is not isolated. Across Nigeria, governors from opposition parties have defected to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in numbers unprecedented in the nation’s democratic history. Critics argue that these defections are not merely voluntary political choices, but part of a strategic pressure campaign leveraging federal power and institutions to fracture opposition influence.
At its centre lies Nigeria’s principal anti-graft agency – the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The EFCC: Anti-Graft Agency or Political Instrument? Founded to combat corruption, the EFCC’s constitutional mandate is to investigate and prosecute financial and economic crimes across public and private sectors. Its legal independence is enshrined in statute and it has historically pursued high-profile cases, including recovery of nearly $500 million in illicit assets in a single year, demonstrating its capacity for tackling corruption.
However, critics now claim that under the Tinubu administration, the EFCC’s prosecutorial power is being perceived (if not deployed) as a political instrument.
Opposition leaders, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and coalition parties such as the African Democratic Congress (ADC), have publicly accused the federal government of using anti-corruption agencies to intimidate opposition figures and governors, effectively pressuring them into aligning with the APC.
In a statement released in December 2025, opposition figures alleged that institutions such as the EFCC, the Nigerian Police and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission were being selectively wielded to weaken political competitors rather than combat financial crime impartially.
This is not merely rhetorical noise. The opposition’s grievances centre on several observable patterns:
Reopened or New Investigations Against Opposition Figures: The ADC pointed to recent abnormal reactivation of long-dormant cases or new inquiries into financial activities involving senior opposition politicians. These, they argue, often arise shortly before critical elections or political realignments.
Alleged Differential Treatment: According to opponents of the current administration, individuals who have defected to the APC appear less likely to face sustained legal scrutiny or prosecution in EFCC proceedings, even in cases of credible allegations of mismanagement.
Timing of Actions: The timing of certain high-profile investigations, emerging ahead of the 2027 general elections, reinforces perceptions that anti-graft measures are tailored to political cycles rather than legal merit.
The EFCC and Presidency have publicly denied these allegations, insisting that the commission operates independently and pursues corruption irrespective of political affiliation and that Nigeria’s democratic freedoms (including party choice and mobility) remain intact.
Yet the perception of bias, once systemic, is hard to erase, especially when political actors deploy powerful state machinery with strategic timing and selective intensity.
Defections and Power Realignment: A Democracy at Risk? Since 2023 and particularly through 2025, a remarkable number of state governors and senior political leaders have crossed over from opposition parties (notably the Peoples Democratic Party – PDP) to the APC. Though defections are normal in Nigeria’s fluid political system, the scale and speed in recent years are historically noteworthy, raising critical questions about underlying incentives.
The SaharaWeeklyNG reported Makinde’s comments within the broader context of a political climate where dissenting voices face greater obstacles than at any time in recent democratic memory.
Governors who remain in opposition find themselves squeezed between growing federal assertiveness and dwindling political capital. Some analysts argue that the combination of federal resource control, political appointments and influence over public agencies exerts tangible pressure on subnational leaders to align with the ruling party for political survival. This dynamic, they contend, undermines competitive party politics and weakens Nigeria’s multiparty democracy.
Speaking Truth to Power: What Makinde’s Critique Exposes. Governor Makinde’s core grievance (that it is increasingly difficult, perhaps perilous, to speak truth to power) resonates widely among civil society actors, political analysts and democratic advocates:
“YOU CANNOT SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER IN THIS DISPENSATION,” Makinde declared, specifically citing the government’s handling of contentious tax reform bills as an example where dissent was neither welcomed nor transparently debated.
Makinde’s critique reflects deeper structural concerns:
Exclusion of Key Stakeholders: Opposition leaders and state executives report being marginalised from meaningful consultation on national policies affecting federal-state relations, revenue sharing and fiscal reforms.
Institutional Intimidation: The perception that state politicians become targets of federal legal scrutiny after taking firm oppositional stances (real or perceived) discourages robust democratic debate.
Erosion of Opposition Space: A symbiotic effect of party defections and institutional pressure is a shrinking viable space for genuine political opposition, weakening checks and balances essential to democratic governance.
A respected political scientist, Dr. Aisha Bello of the University of Lagos, recently argued that “when opposition becomes fraught with state leverage instead of ideological competition, the very foundation of democratic contestation collapses,” adding that “a government that shies away from criticism risks inversion into autocracy.”
Another expert, Prof. Chinedu Eze, former dean of political studies at Ahmadu Bello University, warned that “selective use of anti-corruption agencies as political tools corrodes public trust and ultimately delegates justice into the hands of incumbents rather than independent courts.” These observations echo growing public skepticism.
The Way Forward: Strengthening Democracy and Institutions. Nigeria’s path forward depends on restoring confidence in democratic norms and institutional independence.
Transparent EFCC Processes: Civil society groups and legal scholars are advocating for enhanced transparency in anti-graft investigations, including clear prosecutorial thresholds and independent audits of case initiation and closures.
Judicial Oversight: Strengthening the judiciary’s capacity and independence is critical to ensuring that allegations of political weaponisation do not go unchecked. Courts must remain the ultimate arbiters of evidence and guilt.
Political Reforms: Advocates demand reforms to party financing, federal-state fiscal relations, and consultation mechanisms to reduce incentives for defections driven by federal resource leverage.
Public Engagement: A more informed and engaged civil society, anchored by independent media and civic education, must hold both government and opposition accountable for adherence to democratic principles.
Beyond The Present Moment.
Governor Makinde’s assertion that it is no longer tenable to “speak truth to power” under the current administration reflects unsettling trends in Nigeria’s evolving democratic landscape. While the EFCC and the Presidency maintain that anti-corruption efforts are independent and constitutionally grounded, opposition leaders (backed by political data and patterns of defections) argue that state power is being used to consolidate one-party dominance and undermine political pluralism.
At this critical juncture, Nigeria must choose between entrenching competitive democracy or sliding toward a political monopoly where dissent is subdued, institutions compromised, and power concentrated.
For Nigeria’s democratic ideals to survive (and thrive) its leaders and citizens must ensure that speaking truth to power remains not a perilous act of defiance but an honoured pillar of national life.
APC Chairman Appoints Norbert Akachukwu Sochukwudinma as SSA on Local Government Affairs
By Ifeoma Ikem
The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda, has approved the appointment of Norbert Akachukwu Sochukwudinma (NAS) as Senior Special Assistant (SSA) on Local Government Affairs.
The appointment is part of ongoing efforts by the APC national leadership to strengthen grassroots engagement and enhance coordination between the party’s national secretariat and local government structures across the country.
Sochukwudinma is a seasoned politician and an active member of the APC, with deep roots in Delta State politics. He currently serves as the APC Chairman for Aniocha South Local Government Area.
In addition to his local role, he is also the Coordinating Chairman of APC Chairmen in Delta North, a position through which he has played a strategic role in party mobilisation and reconciliation efforts within the senatorial district.
Known for his commitment to party integration and grassroots development, Sochukwudinma has been actively involved in strengthening the APC’s presence and internal cohesion in Delta State.
Party stakeholders have described his appointment as well-deserved, citing his experience, organisational capacity, and consistent engagement with party members at the ward and local government levels.
The new SSA is expected to bring his grassroots expertise to bear in advising the APC National Chairman on local government affairs, party administration, and effective mobilisation strategies nationwide.
His appointment takes immediate effect.
Politics
PDP’s Ajadi Ally KilamuwayeBadmus Welcomes Former NNPP Senatorial Candidate Ajirotutu into Party
PDP’s Ajadi Ally KilamuwayeBadmus Welcomes Former NNPP Senatorial Candidate Ajirotutu into Party
Nigeria — A former spokesman of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) in the South-West and the Personal Assistant to Ambassador Olufemi Ajadi Oguntoyinbo, the leading Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant in Oyo State, Kilamuwaye Oladayo Badmus, has welcomed Hon. Wasiu Ajirotutu into the PDP.
Ajirotutu, a former 2023 Ogun East senatorial candidate of the NNPP, officially defected to the PDP on Friday, January 23, 2026, during the PDP South-West Stakeholders’ Meeting held in Abeokuta, Ogun State.
The stakeholders’ meeting, which attracted top party leaders from across the region, was described as a “turning point” for the PDP’s renewal in the South-West ahead of the 2027 general elections.
In a press release made available to journalists on Saturday, January 24, 2026, Badmus described Ajirotutu’s defection as a major boost to the party’s strength in the South-West.
He said Ajirotutu played a significant political role during his time in the NNPP, particularly during the 2023 general elections, and expressed confidence that his experience would further strengthen the PDP’s chances in the coming elections.
Badmus said, “Hon. Wasiu Ajirotutu is a man of immense political experience and influence. His defection to the PDP is a strong signal that the party remains the most viable platform for progress and development in the South-West. We welcome him with open arms.”
He added, “Ajirotutu’s contributions during the 2023 elections were notable. He mobilized support, strengthened party structures, and ensured that the NNPP made a meaningful impact in Ogun State. We believe that he will bring that same energy and dedication to the PDP.”
Badmus also emphasized that the PDP is currently undergoing a strategic repositioning in the South-West, noting that the party is attracting key political actors who are committed to unity and good governance.
He said, “The PDP is the party that offers the best alternative for Nigerians. Our doors are open to credible leaders who are ready to work for the welfare of the people. Ajirotutu’s arrival is a welcome development, and we look forward to working together for the success of the PDP in 2027.”
Ajirotutu’s defection, according to political analysts, may strengthen the PDP’s presence in Ogun State, which has remained a key battleground in South-West politics.
Speaking at the Abeokuta meeting, Ajirotutu expressed optimism about his new political home and promised to work for the party’s success.
He said, “I am happy to join the PDP. This party has a rich history of progressive leadership and governance. I believe that together, we can deliver good governance to our people.”
Political observers say Ajirotutu’s defection could have a ripple effect, as more political leaders may follow suit in anticipation of the 2027 elections.
The PDP has been actively consolidating its presence in the South-West, and the inclusion of former NNPP leaders is seen as part of the party’s broader strategy to build a stronger coalition across the region.
As the party continues to welcome defectors, political watchers believe that the 2027 general elections may witness a renewed contest in the South-West, with the PDP positioning itself as a formidable force.
Politics
2027 POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE: APC ON EDGE AS ATIKU–OBI–KWANKWASO REALIGNMENT SHAKES TINUBU’S RE-ELECTION CALCULUS
2027 POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE: APC ON EDGE AS ATIKU–OBI–KWANKWASO REALIGNMENT SHAKES TINUBU’S RE-ELECTION CALCULUS.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com
“How Nigeria’s Fragmented Opposition Is Gradually Finding Common Ground and Why the Ruling Party Is No Longer Laughing.”
Nigeria’s political atmosphere is once again thick with anxiety, calculations and quiet negotiations as the road to the 2027 general elections begins to take shape. At the centre of this unfolding drama is a development the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) can no longer afford to dismiss lightly: the growing convergence of interests among Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi and Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, all three political heavyweights whose combined electoral footprint poses the most serious threat yet to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s second-term ambitions.
While no formal coalition has been announced, the signals, meetings, public statements and strategic silences emerging from opposition circles have been strong enough to trigger visible unease within APC ranks. Party strategists, according to multiple reports, now privately concede that a united opposition ticket (even one forged through compromise) could fundamentally alter Nigeria’s political arithmetic in 2027.
This fear is not rooted in speculation; it is grounded in electoral mathematics, voter behaviour and Nigeria’s worsening socio-economic realities.
Why the APC Is Worried: The Numbers Do Not Lie. The 2023 presidential election exposed a hard truth the APC has struggled to fully confront: Tinubu won power without a national consensus mandate.
Collectively, Atiku Abubakar (PDP), Peter Obi (Labour Party) and Rabiu Kwankwaso (NNPP) won the majority of Nigeria’s states and the Federal Capital Territory, while Tinubu secured victory largely through vote fragmentation. This outcome, widely acknowledged by political analysts, demonstrated that APC dominance is neither total nor guaranteed.
According to Professor Jibrin Ibrahim, a respected political scientist and Senior Fellow at the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD),
“The 2023 election revealed a structural vulnerability in Nigeria’s ruling party system. When opposition votes are divided, incumbents benefit. When they are consolidated, incumbency becomes fragile.”
It is this exact vulnerability that now haunts the APC.
The Strategic Weight of Each Opposition Figure. Each of the three opposition leaders brings a distinct and complementary political strength.
Atiku Abubakar, a former Vice President and five-time presidential contender, retains deep political networks across Northern Nigeria, significant influence within the political elite and enduring appeal among business and policy circles.
Peter Obi represents something different and potentially more disruptive. His 2023 performance redefined youth participation, urban voter mobilisation and issue-based campaigning. Obi’s support base cuts across ethnic and religious lines, driven largely by economic frustration, unemployment and anger at elite misgovernance.
Rabiu Kwankwaso, meanwhile, commands a disciplined grassroots structure, particularly in parts of the North-West. His political movement has shown resilience outside traditional party platforms, proving that regional loyalty still matters in Nigeria’s electoral map.
Dr. Sam Amadi, former Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, captures the moment succinctly:
“An Atiku–Obi–Kwankwaso convergence is not about ideology alone; it is about electoral reach. Together, they represent a near-national spread that the APC cannot replicate without extraordinary state leverage.”
APC’s Public Dismissal vs Private Alarm. Publicly, APC officials have attempted to project confidence (sometimes even mockery) towards opposition coalition talks. Statements suggesting that ego clashes, ambition and distrust will derail any alliance have become standard talking points.
However, seasoned political observers note that public bravado often masks private anxiety.
Behind closed doors, APC strategists are reportedly reassessing voter sentiment, regional alliances and internal party cohesion. The ruling party is particularly concerned about:
Urban youth alienation
Economic hardship and inflation
Rising insecurity
Erosion of public trust in governance
These are areas where the Tinubu administration is under intense scrutiny, both locally and internationally.
According to political economist Dr. Ayo Teriba,
“Economic performance will dominate the 2027 election narrative. If inflation, unemployment and debt continue on their current trajectory, no amount of incumbency advantage will fully neutralise voter anger.”
Coalition Politics: Lessons from History. Nigeria’s political history offers a sobering lesson: successful coalitions are rare but decisive.
The APC itself emerged in 2013 from a merger of ideologically diverse parties united by a single goal whereby dislodging the PDP. That coalition succeeded because ambition was temporarily subordinated to strategy.
Ironically, the same logic now threatens APC’s hold on power.
Professor Bolaji Akinyemi, former Foreign Affairs Minister, once noted: “In transitional democracies, alliances are not built on love; they are built on necessity. Survival often determines unity.”
The question, therefore, is not whether Atiku, Obi and Kwankwaso agree on everything, but whether they can agree on enough to present Nigerians with a credible alternative.
The Real Challenge for the Opposition. Unity alone will not guarantee victory.
For an opposition alliance to succeed, it must present:
A clear economic recovery plan
A credible security framework
A governance philosophy beyond personalities
A shared moral argument for national renewal
Without this, Nigerians may view the coalition as merely a recycled elite arrangement rather than a genuine break from the past.
Civil society advocate Aisha Yesufu warns: “Nigerians are tired of power struggles disguised as coalitions. Any alliance that fails to prioritise accountability, competence and transparency will lose public trust quickly.”
Tinubu’s Dilemma: Incumbency Without Comfort. President Tinubu enters the 2027 cycle with the traditional advantages of incumbency, but without the comfort of popular satisfaction.
Economic reforms, while defended as necessary, have inflicted short-term pain on millions of Nigerians. Combined with security challenges and governance controversies, this has created a volatile electoral environment.
In such conditions, a united opposition becomes more than a political threat as it becomes a symbol of protest, hope and possibility.
Power, Politics and the Future: Nigeria at a Crossroads. The anxiety within the APC is not paranoia; it is political realism.
Whether or not an Atiku–Obi–Kwankwaso alliance ultimately materialises, its mere possibility has already altered Nigeria’s political dynamics. It has forced the ruling party onto the defensive and re-energised a restless electorate searching for alternatives.
As 2027 approaches, Nigeria stands at a familiar but critical crossroads: continuity versus correction, power versus performance, entitlement versus accountability.
One thing is clear; the era of complacent incumbency is over. The political contest ahead promises to be fierce, consequential and unforgiving.
And this time, no stone will be left unturned.
-
celebrity radar - gossips5 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society5 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
Business6 months agoBatsumi Travel CEO Lisa Sebogodi Wins Prestigious Africa Travel 100 Women Award
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING