society
EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE SECRETED SCHEME TO CASH IN ON LIBYA’S BILLIONS
EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE SECRETED SCHEME TO CASH IN ON LIBYA’S BILLIONS
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG
“How newly released documents reveal an attempted exploitation of Libya’s frozen wealth before and after Gaddafi — and what it means for justice, sovereignty, and global finance.”
In one of the most startling and geopolitically charged revelations of the decade, newly released documents from the Epstein Files (a vast tranche of records linked to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein) have unveiled a clandestine blueprint to profit from Libya’s immense frozen state assets during a period of political upheaval that began in 2011. More than a decade after the overthrow and death of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, these records outline plans that, if carried out, risked transforming a nation’s sovereign wealth into the private windfall of global financiers, intermediaries, and former intelligence operatives. The implications extend far beyond financial opportunism, touching the core of international law, post-conflict reconstruction and the fragile sovereignty of states emerging from chaos.
Libya’s Frozen Fortune: The Lure of Billions.
At the heart of these revelations is an email dated July 2011 sent to Epstein by an associate that outlines a proposal to pursue access to Libyan state assets that were frozen abroad in the wake of the NATO-backed uprising that toppled Gaddafi. At the time, the United Nations imposed freezes on Libyan assets under Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973, designed to limit the Gaddafi regime’s access to funds during the conflict. However, this freeze also created a pool of state wealth (estimated at around $80 billion, including $32.4 billion held in the United States) that was suddenly susceptible to external legal and financial manoeuvring.
According to the email, the actual value of what was described as “sovereign, stolen and misappropriated” assets could be three to four times larger than the $80 billion figure, suggesting a potential trove exceeding hundreds of billions. “If we can identify or recover just 5 to 10 percent of these monies and receive between 10 and 25 percent as compensation, we are talking about billions of dollars,” the correspondence stated, framing the operation as a lucrative business opportunity rather than a sovereign asset recovery.
The email went further, painting a picture of Libya as not only a ripe target for asset recovery but also a future hub of investment: one that, if engaged early, could “become their go-to guys” for reconstruction work. The correspondence noted projections that Libya would need to spend at least $100 billion on rebuilding its economy and infrastructure, positioning the scheme as a gateway into a multi-billion-dollar market tied to reconstruction and legal services.
Former Spies and International Networks
What transforms this from opportunistic financial speculation into a geopolitical intrigue is the involvement of former intelligence personnel. The email references preliminary discussions with former agents from Britain’s MI6 and Israel’s Mossad, and suggests that some members expressed willingness to help identify and trace Libyan assets abroad is a stark illustration of how intelligence networks can be folded into private financial projects that operate in the grey intersection of influence, law and power.
The use of former intelligence officials in legal and asset-recovery matters is not inherently illegitimate; in many cases, their expertise in tracing financial flows and navigating international systems can aid legitimate restitution efforts. However, in the context of this proposal (where the stated objective was profit extraction for private benefit unaffiliated with Libya’s legitimate government) the lines between recovery, coercion, and exploitation become perilously blurred.
Sovereignty, Asset Recovery and International Law.
The emergence of these documents has reignited a long-standing debate over sovereign asset freezes and the ethics of asset recovery. Scholars and policy experts emphasize that frozen funds belong to the people of the state in question, and that any recovery or release should serve the sovereign interests of that nation and not the private ambitions of third parties. According to analysis published by the International Crisis Group, efforts to reform sanctions and allow asset reinvestment must be conducted with “the consent of Libya’s legitimate authorities,” and designed to benefit the Libyan people rather than external interests.
The complex legal landscape surrounding frozen Libyan assets has already resulted in numerous litigations. Libya has fought cases in European courts, including against global finance giants such as Goldman Sachs, while also seeking pathways to unlock portions of its sovereign wealth for national development and economic revival. However, political fragmentation (a persistent challenge in Libya’s civil conflict) has frequently stalled progress, underscoring how easily frozen assets can become political bargaining chips rather than tools for reconstruction.
As legal expert Mohammed bin Shaaban observed in recent reporting on Libya’s asset situation, the maze of international litigation and competing claims has left much of the country’s wealth inaccessible and shifts in governance further complicate matters. Such dynamics underline the inherent risk when third parties position themselves as intermediaries in sovereign matters without clear legal mandate or ethical grounding.
Libya’s Fragile Context and Corruption Complexities
Understanding the Epstein scheme also requires acknowledging the broader context of Libya’s political instability and deeply entrenched corruption.
Transparency International consistently ranks Libya among the lowest globally on the Corruption. Perceptions Index, a stark reflection of systemic governance challenges since Gaddafi’s fall. That corruption has extended into the management of state resources and has complicated efforts to ensure that any recovered assets serve the public good rather than private pockets.
This offers a sobering backdrop to the Epstein correspondence. What might at first appear as financial opportunism can also be interpreted (in the harshest light) as a schemed attempt to exploit both the political disarray and the legal ambiguity surrounding Libya’s frozen assets for private advantage. In environments where rule of law is weak and sovereign authority is contested, external actors can, intentionally or otherwise, exert disproportionate influence over outcomes.
Ethics of Engagement and the Limits of Opportunism.
The revelations raise essential questions about ethical boundaries in international finance and asset recovery. The stated willingness of international law firms to work on a contingency fee basis (paid only upon success) reflects common practice in asset litigation. Yet the inclusion of such firms alongside former intelligence operatives underlines how humanitarian, legal and economic projects can be co-opted into efforts aimed at generating private profit under the guise of public service.
Experts argue that genuine asset recovery should be driven by transparent legal frameworks, international cooperation and unwavering commitment to justice for victimized populations. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and other multilateral bodies have long emphasized that illicit financial flows hamper development and that asset recovery must be anchored in lawful restitution not speculative gain.
The Road Ahead: A Cautionary Tale for Post-Conflict Economies.
The Epstein Files revelations about Libya serve as a potent reminder of the perils facing nations emerging from conflict: when enormous sovereign wealth is frozen or in legal limbo, it attracts not only legitimate legal claims but also those driven by speculation and profit. What should be a process grounded in restoring national wealth and dignity can become a theatre for the powerful to profit off instability.
In a world grappling with conflict-induced asset freezes (from Libya to other nations displaced by war or sanctions) the imperative is clear: international law and ethical standards must protect sovereign assets, ensure their return benefits the people to whom they belong, and guard against schemes that would commodify national misfortune into private fortune. Only through principled engagement and rigorous accountability can the promise of rebuilding shattered states be realised without handing over their priceless heritage to opportunists.
society
Stop Means Stop”: Legal Experts Warn Ignoring ‘Stop’ During Intimate Acts Can Be Criminally Punishable
“Stop Means Stop”: Legal Experts Warn Ignoring ‘Stop’ During Intimate Acts Can Be Criminally Punishable
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG
“Grounded in international law and consent principles, legal authorities stress that continuing sexual activity after a partner withdraws consent may constitute sexual assault and lead to imprisonment.”
A growing body of legal interpretation and expert opinion reaffirm that consent in intimate encounters is not a one-off event but an ongoing requirement; withdrawn at any time by either participant. Legal practitioners and rights advocates are increasingly warning that if one partner clearly says “stop” during sexual activity and the other continues, this conduct can constitute a criminal offence with significant penalties, including imprisonment.
Consent must be “a voluntary agreement to engage in the sexual activity in question,” and crucially can be revoked at any stage. Once a partner expresses withdrawal of consent (by words like “stop” or by unmistakable conduct) the other party is legally obligated to cease all activity immediately. Failure to respect this is widely recognised in multiple legal jurisdictions as sexual assault or rape.
Professor Deborah Rhode, a prominent authority on legal ethics, has stated: “Respect for autonomy and bodily integrity lies at the core of consent law. Ignoring a partner’s withdrawal of consent undermines basic personal freedoms and is treated as a serious offence in criminal law.”
According to experts, this legal principle is not limited to strangers but applies equally to long-term partners and spouses. The Criminal Code in many countries explicitly rejects implied or blanket consent based on relationship status.
Human rights lawyer Amal Clooney has similarly emphasised that clear communication and mutual agreement are essential, and that “once consent is withdrawn, any continued sexual activity crosses the line into criminal conduct.”
This means that in places where consent law is well-established, ignoring an explicit “stop” can lead to charges of sexual assault, with courts interpreting such conduct as a violation of an individual’s autonomy and dignity.
The issue has gained media and legal attention in recent years across numerous jurisdictions (including Canada, parts of Europe, and reform discussions in U.S. states) as courts and legislatures clarify that sexual consent is continuous and revocable at any time. Although no globally consolidated database exists of individual cases tied specifically to a news report on this warning, reputable legal frameworks consistently reinforce that continuing after “stop” is unlawful.
The subject engages legal scholars, criminal law practitioners, human rights experts, and statutory bodies advocating sexual violence prevention. Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors may pursue charges when clear evidence shows that consent was withdrawn and ignored.
In practice, consent frameworks require that the person initiating or continuing sexual activity take reasonable steps to ensure ongoing affirmation of willingness. Silence, passive behaviour, or failure to stop when asked cannot substitute for ongoing consent.
In summary, the legal maxim is clear: verbal or unambiguous withdrawal of consent must be respected. Ignoring it shifts the encounter from consensual to criminal, potentially resulting in serious legal consequences including imprisonment.
Lagos Family Property Dispute Turns Violent After Death of Chief Omotayo Ojo
By Ifeoma Ikem
A festering family dispute over property has escalated into a series of violent attacks in Lagos, leaving residents of a contested apartment in fear for their safety.
Mrs. Omotayo-Ojo-Alolagbe (Nee Omotayo-Ojo) the third child and first daughter of the late Omotayo Ojo, has alleged repeated assaults and destruction of property by her siblings from her father’s other marriages.
According to her account, hostility against her began while her father was still alive, allegedly fueled by the affection and support he showed her. She claimed that tensions worsened after his death in 2019.
Mrs. Alolagbe stated that her late father had given her a particular apartment during his lifetime, assuring her she would not suffer hardship, especially after her husband left the marriage. She said the property became her primary source of livelihood and shelter.
However, she alleged that her siblings had sold off several other family properties and were determined to dispossess her of the apartment allocated to her by their father.
The dispute reportedly turned violent on Nov. 15, 2025, when unknown persons allegedly attacked the building. She said the incident prompted her to petition the Chief Judge of Lagos State and the Commissioner of Police.
Despite the pending legal proceedings, she alleged that another attack occurred on Jan. 21, 2026. During that incident, parts of the building were vandalised, including the walkway and the main gate, which was reportedly removed.
A third attack was said to have taken place on Feb.18, 2026, during which the roof, gates, and sections of the walkway were allegedly dismantled. Residents were reportedly assaulted, and some were allegedly forced to part with money under duress.
Tenants in the apartment complex are said to be living in fear amid the repeated invasions, expressing concern over their safety and uncertainty about further violence.
Mrs. Alolagbe alleged that the attacks were led by a man identified as Mr. Alliu, popularly known as aka “Champion,” whom she described as a political thug. She claimed he arrived with a group of about 50 men, allegedly brandishing weapons and breaking bottles to intimidate residents.
She further alleged that the group boasted of connections with senior police officers, politicians in Lagos State, and even the presidency, claiming they were untouchable.
According to her, some arrests were initially made following the incidents, but the suspects were later released. She expressed concern that the alleged perpetrators continue to threaten her, making it difficult for her to move freely.
She also disclosed that during a meeting on Feb. 23, 2026, an Area Commander reportedly told her that little could be done because the matter was already before a court of law.
The development has raised concerns about the enforcement of law and order in civil disputes that degenerate into violence, particularly when court cases are pending.
As tensions persist, residents and observers are calling on relevant authorities to ensure the safety of lives and properties ,while allowing the courts to determine ownership and bring lasting resolution to the dispute.
Adron Homes Introduces Special Ramadan Offer with Discounts and Gift Rewards
As the holy month of Ramadan inspires reflection, sacrifice, and generosity, Adron Homes and Properties Limited has unveiled its special Ramadan Promo, encouraging families, investors, and aspiring homeowners to move beyond seasonal gestures and embrace property ownership as a lasting investment in their future.
The company stated that the Ramadan campaign, running from January 20th to April 6th, 2026, is designed to help Nigerians build long-term value and stability through accessible real estate opportunities. The initiative offers generous discounts, flexible payment structures, and meaningful Ramadan-themed gifts across its estates and housing projects nationwide.
Under the promo structure, clients enjoy a 30% discount on land purchases alongside a convenient 36-month flexible payment plan, making ownership more affordable and stress-free.
In the spirit of the season, the company has also attached thoughtful rewards to qualifying payments. Clients who pay ₦200,000 receive a Provision Hamper to support their household during the fasting period, while those who pay ₦400,000 receive an Automated Prayer Mat to enhance their spiritual experience throughout Ramadan.
According to the company, the Ramadan Promo reflects its commitment to aligning lifestyle, faith, and financial growth, enabling Nigerians at home and in the diaspora to secure appreciating assets while observing a season centered on discipline and forward planning.
Reiterating its dedication to secure land titles, prime locations, and affordable pricing, Adron Homes urged prospective buyers to take advantage of the limited-time Ramadan campaign to build a future grounded in stability, prosperity, and generational wealth.
This promo covers estates located in Lagos, Shimawa, Sagamu, Atan–Ota, Papalanto, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Osun, Ekiti, Abuja, Nasarawa, and Niger states.
As Ramadan calls for purposeful living and wise decisions, Adron Homes is redefining the season, transforming reflection into investment and faith into a lasting legacy.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society5 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING