Business
Festus Keyamo and His Brand Of Administrative Activism* By Philip Agbese
*Festus Keyamo and His Brand Of Administrative Activism*
By Philip Agbese
Festus Keyamo, the enigmatic figure at the helm of Nigeria’s aviation sector, has been a subject of both admiration and controversy. His unconventional approach to governance has polarised opinions, with some hailing him as a visionary leader and others questioning his methods. As the Aviation Minister, Keyamo has been unapologetically vocal about his commitment to reforming the industry, but his fervour for change has often been met with scepticism and resistance.
Of truth, one can not discuss Festus Keyamo without acknowledging his unyielding dedication to Nigeria. His admirable cockiness and unwavering patriotism and willingness to stand up for what he believes in are undeniable. Keyamo’s refusal to conform to the traditional norms of governance has earned him both admirers and detractors. Some argue that his zealousness is a breath of fresh air in a landscape rife with bureaucratic red tape, while others caution that his approach may be too radical for the delicate political ecosystem of Nigeria.
Being a proponent of grassroots empowerment, he believes that the voices of ordinary citizens must be heard in the corridors of power. To this end, he has worked tirelessly to mobilise communities, educate citizens on their rights, and empower them to demand better governance. Keyamo’s grassroots activism has inspired many Nigerians to take a more active role in shaping the country’s political future.
Festus Keyamo’s brand of administrative activism is not for the faint of heart. His willingness to challenge the status quo and push the boundaries of conventional governance is both commendable and disconcerting. While some laud his boldness, others fear that it may lead to unintended repercussions. Keyamo’s unapologetic stance has drawn comparisons to other historical figures who were willing to sacrifice everything for their ideals.
However, it is essential to consider the lessons from history. Keyamo’s determination to die for Nigeria, while admirable, should be tempered with caution. The case of Muammar Gaddafi serves as a cautionary tale. Gaddafi’s desire to die for Africa ultimately led to his downfall, as he was betrayed by his people.
Keyamo must be mindful of the potential consequences of such extreme rhetoric and ensure that his actions align with the best interests of the Nigerian people. It is crucial to tread carefully when treading such uncharted territory, especially in a country as complex and volatile as Nigeria.
Keyamo’s purported readiness to “die for Nigeria” is a testament to his unwavering commitment, but it also raises concerns about the potential consequences of such uncompromising dedication. History is replete with examples of individuals who staked everything on their convictions, only to face betrayal and disillusionment. It is a cautionary tale that should not be dismissed lightly.
Due to his fearlessness in the face of adversity, another facet of Keyamo’s administrative activism is his commitment to the rule of law, and this has earned him more political enemies than friends. He firmly believes that all individuals, regardless of their status or wealth, should be subject to the same legal standards. Throughout his career, he has faced numerous challenges and threats due to his outspokenness and activism.
Keyamo has been a vocal advocate for judicial reform in Nigeria, pushing for greater independence and efficiency in the country’s legal system. Despite these obstacles, Keyamo has remained steadfast in his commitment to social justice and human rights. His courage and determination have inspired many others to join him in the fight for a more just and equitable society. His efforts have helped to strengthen the rule of law and ensure that justice is served fairly and impartially.
The call for Keyamo to ”wake up” and recognise the realities of Nigeria is a poignant one. The complexities of the Nigerian political landscape can not be underestimated, and Keyamo needs to navigate these intricacies with prudence. While his passion for Nigeria is unquestionable, this fervour must be tempered with a deep understanding of the nuanced challenges facing the nation. An understanding of the fact that sources of progressive change and growth like his are mostly suffocated to die prematurely, or attacked ferociously till they fade into oblivion should be something he must have to consider seriously in his journey.
Setting aside the fervour surrounding Festus Keyamo’s zealousness, it is crucial to examine his impact as the Aviation Minister. His reforms in the sector have been both ambitious and divisive. Keyamo’s efforts to modernise and revitalise Nigeria’s aviation industry have been met with a mixed reception. While many applaud his bold initiatives, others express apprehension about the potential pitfalls of such rapid change. It’s not farfetched that the latter are people who have a penchant for the continuity of rascality and corruption, which have bedevilled the aviation sector for a long time.
Moving beyond Keyamo’s convictions, it is crucial to note that, during his tenure, Keyamo implemented several reforms aimed at improving the aviation sector in Nigeria. These reforms have had a significant impact on various aspects of the industry, including safety standards, infrastructure development, and operational efficiency.
One of Keyamo’s notable achievements was the introduction of stricter safety regulations. Under his leadership, the Aviation Ministry implemented measures to enhance safety protocols, ensuring that Nigerian airports and airlines adhere to international standards. This has not only improved the safety of air travel within the country but has also bolstered Nigeria’s reputation in the global aviation community.
Furthermore, Keyamo prioritised infrastructure development in the aviation sector. He spearheaded projects aimed at expanding and modernizing airports across the country, improving connectivity and facilitating economic growth. These infrastructure investments have not only enhanced the travel experience for passengers but have also attracted foreign investment and boosted tourism.
Keyamo’s reforms also focused on improving operational efficiency within the aviation sector. He introduced measures to streamline processes, reduce bureaucracy, and enhance transparency. These efforts have resulted in smoother operations, reduced delays, and improved customer service, benefiting both passengers and industry stakeholders.
It is important to acknowledge that Festus Keyamo’s vision for Nigeria’s aviation sector is driven by a genuine desire to propel the nation towards progress. His determination to address longstanding issues and overhaul outdated practices is a testament to his commitment to effect positive change. However, the path to reform is fraught with challenges, and Keyamo must navigate these obstacles with caution and foresight.
While his unwavering commitment to Nigeria is commendable, he must be cautious of the lessons from history and ensure that his actions align with the best interests of the Nigerian people. As the Aviation Minister, Keyamo has implemented significant reforms that have positively impacted the aviation sector. His focus on safety, infrastructure development, and operational efficiency has yielded tangible results, improving the travel experience and bolstering Nigeria’s reputation in the global aviation community.
Time will be kind to tell us how Festus Keyamo’s legacy will be one of the unyielding triumphs in the annals of Nigeria’s history. Generations will look back in time to remember that man who worked great wonders in the aviation sector, leaving so much for us to gain from his stewardship in the aviation sector.
As the nation continues to navigate its challenges, leaders like Keyamo must strike a delicate balance between passion and pragmatism, ensuring that their efforts lead to sustainable and inclusive development for all Nigerians.
Agbese MHR is the Deputy Spokesperson, 10th House of Representatives writing from Abuja.
Business
FLOUTING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, DEFYING COURT ORDERS, AND DISREGARDING ARBITRATION: THE FACTS BEHIND HADIZA BALA USMAN’S ABUSE OF OFFICE AS NPA MD
FLOUTING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, DEFYING COURT ORDERS, AND DISREGARDING ARBITRATION: THE FACTS BEHIND HADIZA BALA USMAN’S ABUSE OF OFFICE AS NPA MD
By BUA Group | May 31, 2025
We have noted recent public statements made by Ms. Hadiza Bala Usman, the former Managing Director of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), who was sacked from office. In her comments, she accused BUA Group and our Chairman, Abdul Samad Rabiu, of breaching a concession agreement and distorting facts. These claims were made in response to our Chairman’s interview and article, “Two Years of President Tinubu: A Business Perspective” (watch at https://bit.ly/pbatbua), which celebrated Nigeria’s reform trajectory and referenced prior instances of arbitrary disruptions to business operations, without naming anyone – a situation that has now been curtailed by President Tinubu’s no-nonsense approach to bringing sanity and stability to the business environment in Nigeria.
Ordinarily, we would not engage, but the distortions in her response necessitate this factual clarification, especially as they relate to her actions during her tenure as MD of the NPA.
THE CONTRACT AND WHAT SHE OMITTED
In 2006,
BUA entered into a valid long lease agreement with the NPA to rehabilitate and operate Terminal B at Rivers Port in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. Long before Ms. Usman’s appointment, BUA had begun formal engagement with the NPA to address outstanding remedial works and infrastructural deficiencies. These discussions were nearing their conclusion when she assumed office.
Rather than build on that process, Ms. Usman ignored BUA’s requests and obligations under the agreement. In 2016, BUA wrote to the NPA under Article 8.4 of the lease, mandating concessionaires to report environmental and safety concerns and to seek approval for remedial works. Rather than act constructively, Ms. Usman used that letter as a pretext to issue a termination notice and summarily shut down the terminal, without providing any prior warning, consultation, or invoking the dispute resolution clause.
She forgot or failed to disclose in her response that the NPA, under her leadership, was itself in material breach of core obligations including, failing to hand over critical portions of the port, leaving derelict iron ore on the berths, failing to dredge or repair quay walls, and neglecting to provide mandatory security. These lapses were significant impediments to BUA’s operations and, as a result, led to disputes between the parties.
ILLEGALITY, CONTEMPT, AND DISREGARD FOR CONTRACTUAL MECHANISMS
After the unlawful termination, BUA approached the Federal High Court, which promptly granted an injunction restraining the NPA from proceeding with termination. The NPA itself then referred the dispute to arbitration, as stipulated in Section 17.3 of the agreement, which clearly states:
“Any dispute, controversy or claim… shall be exclusively and finally settled under the dispute resolution process prescribed in this Article.”
Despite this, Ms. Usman, against the advice of her agency, unilaterally decommissioned the berths, thereby violating both the agreement and a court injunction. To be clear, the concession agreement granted her no such power to decommission. If she believes otherwise, we invite her to publicly cite the specific clause that authorizes this action.
To further compound the illegality, BUA, after providing the guarantees and indemnities requested by the NPA, was permitted to resume operations briefly. Merely three weeks later, the terminal was again shut down, this time by Ms. Usman’s instruction. This left no doubt that her actions were motivated not by due process, but by personal animosity and abuse of office.
BUA subsequently filed contempt proceedings and was looking at estimated losses of over $10 million. These proceedings were only withdrawn out of respect for national interest and following the intervention of well-meaning Nigerians within and outside the government.
PRESIDENT BUHARI WAS NOT MISINFORMED—HE ACTED ON FACTS AND LAW
Ms. Usman’s claim that former President Muhammadu Buhari was “misinformed” when he reversed her actions is false, disrespectful, and disingenuous.
Following a meeting that our Chairman had the privilege of holding with President Buhari in 2018, he presented the matter to the President, who then directed the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation to conduct a thorough legal review and investigate the situation. The AGF invited all parties, including Ms. Usman, to several meetings. We never saw her at any of them.
Nevertheless, the AGF proceeded to undertake a comprehensive review of the contract, the litigation, the arbitration clause, and all correspondence and actions by BUA and NPA. The legal advice (attached herewith) found that the termination was unlawful, the decommissioning was without any legal basis, and that BUA’s rights should be reinstated.
It was on this basis that President Buhari ordered the reversal of her unlawful actions. His intervention preserved the sanctity of the contract, saved over 4,000 jobs, and BUA’s $500 million integrated investment cluster involving flour, pasta, and sugar processing facilities, which were all dependent on terminal access. For this, we remain deeply grateful to former President Buhari.
As our Chairman said in his interview, imagine if he weren’t privileged to have access. Nonetheless, this culture of impunity has been significantly curtailed under President Tinubu’s leadership, as many are aware that they could be dismissed or imprisoned if they abuse their positions.
POST-HADIZA: DUE PROCESS RESTORED, INVESTMENT RESUMED
Following Ms. Usman’s removal from office, the NPA, under new leadership, implemented the AGF’s position. In 2022, BUA was granted formal approval to resume reconstruction works. The contract was awarded to TREVI, and BUA has since invested over $65 million—entirely self-funded and with no recourse to public funds or subsidies. Work is ongoing, and completion is expected in the first quarter of 2026.
THE REAL DANGER: INVESTOR CONFIDENCE AND THE RULE OF LAW
We must state clearly that this matter goes beyond BUA. Had Ms. Usman’s actions been allowed to stand, it would have sent a disastrous signal that contracts in Nigeria are worthless, court orders are optional, and public institutions or individuals can act unilaterally without consequence. We must never return to that era.
Nigeria’s reform success today is rooted in respecting contracts, due process, and investor confidence—principles being restored under President Tinubu’s administration, under which BUA has committed over $1 billion in new investments across energy, food processing, manufacturing, infrastructure, and social interventions.
We wish to emphasise that Ms. Usman is entitled to her opinions, irrespective of how distorted they may be. However, she is not entitled to distort the facts or rewrite history. We do not seek a public spat and would like her to concentrate on fulfilling her duties in her new role under the strong leadership of President Tinubu.
We therefore simply restate the facts that Ms Hadiza Bala-Usman had no authority to decommission Terminal B unilaterally. She also acted in defiance of a court injunction and contractual procedure, and her actions caused significant economic loss of over USD10 million, reputational risk to BUA, and investor concern for Nigeria.
Our core message remains the same: public office should be viewed as a position of trust rather than a platform for personal biases. Those granted public power need to resist the temptation to let prejudice, ego, and vendetta influence their actions.
If Ms Hadiza Bala-Usman believes she acted lawfully, we challenge her to cite the specific clause or clauses that guided her unlawful actions. If not, let the facts remain where they belong — in the public record.
Signed,
BUA Group
May 31, 2025
Business
Faith, Discipline and Hard Work Brought Me This Far- Now I’m Building Platforms That Will Outlive Me- AMB. TOSIN MICHEAL OWONIFARI
Faith, Discipline and Hard Work Brought Me This Far- Now I’m Building Platforms That Will Outlive Me- AMB. TOSIN MICHEAL OWONIFARI
T21 Services (UK) T21 Consultancy Services (Nigeria) Tosin Owonifari Empowerment Foundation (TOEF)
-
society3 months agoRamadan Relief: Matawalle Distributes Over ₦1 Billion to Support 2.5 Million Zamfara Residents
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoCourt To Hear ₦5 Billion Suit Against Sinach For Alleged Copyright Infringement
-
Business6 months agoDangote Refinery, wonder of modern technology ― Japan Ambassador, business community
-
society5 months agoNAPS Presidential Aspirant Lauds Tinubu’s ₦3.5 Trillion Education Budget, Advocates for Polytechnic Investment