Politics
INEC , DON’T PLUNGE NIGERIA INTO CHAOS
ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF ELECTION RESULTS: INEC , DON’T PLUNGE NIGERIA INTO CHAOS
INEC- The attention of the Centre for Social and Economic Rights (CSER) has been drawn to a statement credited to the National Commissioner for information and voter education, Independent National Electoral Commission INEC Mr. Festus Okoye in response to the National Assembly rejection of amendment of the Electoral Act to accommodate Electronic transmission of election results, where he reiterated the electoral umpire preparedness to deploy electronic transmission of results after having tested the process in remote areas during the 2020 Edo state gubernatorial election.
According to Okoye on a national television station as reported in a national daily, “ So we have made our own position very clear, that we have the capacity and we have the will to deepen the use of technology in the electoral process.”
This statement by Mr. Festus Okoye as a representative of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is very unfortunate due to the fact that it has aided and abetted in politicizing a critical national discourse for which he has little or no knowledge technically and ought to have been circumspect and allowed the experts to educate him and Nigerians. To come out and hastily make a blanket statement on electronic transmission of election results nationwide in 36 states and the federal capital territory for future elections on the basis of transmission of results in remote areas in only Edo state in 2020 of which we are going to demand proof as the days go by, is rather unfortunate and depressing.
For a fact, if INEC is transmitting election results electronically, we know for sure that INEC as at this moment, despite the assertion of Mr. Okoye, does not have the technological system in place for election results in the whole of Nigeria, except if he can come out with verifiable facts to corroborate his claim and we hope he will come out to do that in the days ahead.
From the conversation around electronic transmission of election results at the National Assembly and in other fora, it has been established that the telecommunication coverage of the country by the GSM service providers according to the regulatory body Nigeria Communication Commision (NCC) is just about 50% and the coverage is not even equal, where some areas have 2G network, others have 3G and 4G network and the least that can provide a link for transmission of election results is a 3G network according to the experts.
As we speak, even the areas that have 4G networks have a huge problem of telecommunication connectivity, which explains why even in urban areas like Lagos, Abuja, Ibadan, Onitsha, Aba, Kaduna, Kano etc. GSM users, organizations, government agencies, institutions and even Point of Sale (POS) terminal operators still contend with the issue of connectivity. For example, it’s a fact that there is virtually no Nigerian who has not had the traumatic experience of poor or zero network resulting in SMS not delivering for hours and days after being sent or not even delivering at all despite the confirmation of sent on the sender’s phone. POS terminal operators have had and still have running battles with their customers on the issue of money transfer for payments or to banks accounts which was sent and confirmed delivered on the system, but which the receipent never received and consequently resulted in the matter going to the police station for resolution or even resulted in physical fight and the attendant disruption of public peace and severance of relationships. At times, when you deposit or transfer money into and from bank accounts within the financial institutions physically or online, you don’t receive alert for hours and days, only through persistent calls from the would be receipent of non delivery, would you realize that the transaction was aborted and the transfer cancelled with the money returned and in some cases, you have to go to the bank for resolution of such a transaction. As a Nigerian, we have had instances where even in your location, one is left stranded because the network suddenly went down and one cannot make quality calls or send messages for hours and even for some days, only for you later to receive an apology SMS from the service providers for the inconveniences caused by system breakdown or disruption.
A stark reality of our state of national affairs today is that our society suffers from trust deficit. Imagine a situation in which election has been concluded in a location and results that have been transmitted electronically say from 4.30pm, is now delivered and acknowledged at 7pm same day or even beyond because of technical hitches, poor or lack of coverage or natural factors? Definitely, the swan song from the party that lost the election and it supporters would be that the result has been manipulated, even when they know that is not the case and instead of being responsible to acknowledge the technological deficiency, they would continue with their cries of mischief just to gain public sympathy and undermine the process for political capital.
If Mr. Festus Okoye statement that INEC has the capacity to transmit election results electronically is to be taken as the gospel truth, then persons and financial institutions won’t be at the receiving end of financial fraud by criminals who continue to perpetuate their criminality by exploiting the loopholes in the man-made telecommunication system globally for which the service providers themselves have no absolute control.
As it stands, INEC does not have its own telecomunication connectivity to transmit elections results from whichever area within Nigeria that Mr. Okoye is talking about confidently without substance, INEC is going to rely a third party, the GSM service providers for a platform for which there is no part of the 36 states and the federal capital territory of Nigeria that does not suffer from zero, poor, unreliable, susceptible to weather fluctuations and even manipulations by evil minded persons and groups which have resulted in untoward consequences on humanity.
The attempt to politicize this serious area of our engagement by persons and groups is very unfortunate and sad. The only difference between electronic transmission of results and the manual transmission is the issue of time. The time limitations of the manual transmission that ought to be a source of concern is by far better than the electronic transmission of election results which is also susceptible to manipulations with the reality on ground.
For example, we presently operate a manual transmission of results in which election results are publicly announced at the polling stations and party agents and security agencies sign the results sheets and receive copies and it is pasted publicly at the polling station before the onward transmission. Even when this process is carried out transparently and creditably in the full glare of the stakeholders, we have had and will continue to have situations where a party agent because after the final sorting and counting of ballot papers according to votes scored by parties, recognizing that his party has been defeated, refuse to sign the results sheets or disappear from signing just to undermine the credibility of the process and he and other party faithfuls and supporters continue to sing the song mischievous cries that they have been robbed at the polls without proof, whereas it is not true. Can you compare the scenario above with an electronic transmission of results which would be executed by only the electoral umpire? Definitely, this is nothing but an invitation to anarchy knowing that the mindset of the average human being for mischief and wolf cries is legendary.
Also, in the case of electoral disputes, how can an aggrieved candidate and party pursue it’s case at the courts with facts if for example, the primary source of data used in transferring the election result is stolen, missing or damaged? This electronic transmission of result has the tendency to undermine the conflict resolution mechanism of our electoral system which is against the tenets of fairness and justice even in election matters.
Today, because of the advancement we have made in our electoral system, at election time, even with the manual transmission of results, the voters are kings as the political party justle with one another to curry their votes through financial and other forms of inducement before election that we derisively referred to as “Di ibo, ko se obe” meaning “Vote and cook soup” at one of the staggered gubernatorial elections only recently in which we waged a war and are still on it against vote buying. With this electronic transmission of election results campaign being waged at all front, one suspect that the king role of the voters would be displaced with that of hackers as politicians are capable of doing anything to get to power at all cost. Also, what guarantee can the GSM services providers initiate to protect the system against vandalism and disruption of telecommunication system in areas which agents of party A believe is the stronghold of party B to prevent electronic transmission of results?
To those who are fraudulently mouthing and confusing the uninformed that electronic transmission of election result would eliminate manipulation and ballot snatching, this is very untrue. Electronic transmission of results can only happen after the conclusion of election in which ballot papers thumbprinted by voters at the polls have been sorted and counted, if ballot box containing ballot papers is snatched and or damaged, what would be counted and transmitted as election results electronically?
We must at this juncture, express our disappointment with honourable legislators who made the right and realistic decision of voting against electronic transmission of election results for now, but have according to reports, been coming out to deny doing such as a result of the relentless campaign of blackmail and calumny against their patriotic and nationalistic decision to save Nigeria from descending into intended chaos by the insistence on this amendment from some unfortunately concerned and mischievous quarters, whether we have the infrastructure on ground or not to operate it, but have adopted the slogan of just do it for whatever it means. Critical public decision are very bitter and painstaking decision that must be fought and defended with facts no matter whose ox is gored.
The progress made so far in our electoral system has caused untold pain and inconvenience to beneficiaries of the old system, today, we have a PVC and card reader system in place to check manipulation of voting by proxy, even though we are not there yet, the electronic transmission of results is fraught with landmines of hackers, zero and poor telecommunication connectivity of which the country suffers from unreliable and porous service which can be exploited to undermine our election and national security.
To the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), election results is a national security information which for the sake of national security should not be transmitted through a third party which the GSM service providers platform represents and because of the inherent dangers it portends in the short and long term, don’t plunge Nigeria into chaos by trying to be politically correct, it is dangerous to our collective humanity.
Politics
Political Earthquake in Kano: How, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, Nasiru Gawuna’s Move to ADC Reshapes North-West Politics
Political Earthquake in Kano: How, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, Nasiru Gawuna’s Move to ADC Reshapes North-West Politics
The political atmosphere of Nigeria’s North-West was fundamentally altered on a sweltering afternoon in 2026 after Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso former Governor of Kano State and Former Minister for Defence who is also the “Grand Commander” of the Red-Cap revolution, finalized a move that many viewed as the ultimate masterstroke of his political career. By transitioning from the NNPP to the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Kwankwaso did more than change platforms; he effectively reset the coordinates of the nation’s largest voting bloc.
Senator Kwankwaso’s pedigree is defined by a singular devotion to human capital development and an almost mythical grassroots loyalty preceded him. He turned a local movement, the Kwankwasiyya, into a disciplined, ideological army that transcends traditional party structures. His entry into the ADC instantly transformed a secondary party into a formidable fortress, signaling to the ruling elite that the North-West is no longer a monolith under their control.
The gravity of this shift is most profound in Kano, the heartbeat of Northern commerce. For years, the state was a polarized battlefield between the Kwankwasiyya and established conservative wings. However, the entry of Nasiru Yusuf Gawuna into the same ADC orbit has created a “Kano Super-Alliance” that was previously unthinkable. Kwankwaso, the visionary architect who sent thousands of Kano’s children to global universities, now finds his populist ideology merging with Gawuna’s administrative steadiness and deep-rooted institutional connections.
This synergy is a seismic departure from the politics of “zero-sum” rivalry; it is a calculated fusion of mass appeal and the strategic machinery required to protect and deliver votes.
This move reshuffles the entire North-West deck. As Kwankwaso plants the ADC flag across the region, he is attracting a wave of heavyweights from Kaduna to Sokoto who feel marginalized by the status quo. His political pedigree allows him to speak with a regional authority that others lack, positioning himself as a protector during a time of economic uncertainty. By bringing Gawuna into this fold, the dynamics of Kano politics have shifted from a war of attrition to a coalition of necessity. This alliance creates a “Third Way” that bypasses the failures of the old guard, promising a return to the rapid growth that defined the Kwankwaso years, but with a broader, more inclusive base that could dictate the occupant of Aso Rock in 2027.
Kwankwaso’s career has always been defined by a uniquely personal brand of power. From 1999 to 2015, he served two terms as Governor of Kano State, in addition to roles as Minister of Defence and Senator. While many were surprised by his recent maneuvers; especially following closed-door meetings with President Bola Tinubu, he chose the emerging ADC over the ruling APC.
In the high-stakes theater of Nigerian politics, few events have jolted the region quite like the defection of Nasiru Yusuf Gawuna from the APC to the ADC on March 31, 2026. Coming just twenty-four hours after Kwankwaso’s move, Gawuna’s transition fundamentally has also altered the political calculus in Kano. What makes this moment remarkable is the sheer drama of the reversal. Gawuna’s political journey has been a steady, calculated ascent through Kano’s establishment. He first shot to prominence as Commissioner of Agriculture under Governor Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, earning a reputation for hands-on management in a state where farming is the economic backbone. He eventually rose to Deputy Governor, serving for nearly six years and gaining invaluable executive experience. Beyond partisan politics, Gawuna distinguished himself as Chairman of the Governing Council of Bayero University and, most recently, as Chairman of the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN). He resigned from the FMBN on March 27, 2026, citing compliance with presidential directives regarding political appointees.
A look back at the 2023 gubernatorial election reveals just how significant Gawuna is. Running under the APC, he polled over 890,000 votes against the formidable Kwankwasiyya machine. This proved that he is one of the few politicians in Kano who can genuinely compete with Kwankwaso’s electoral machinery. His strength is threefold: he appeals to the youth, the religious establishment (Ulama), and the business community; he has the capacity to split the APC vote; and he has demonstrated he can deliver votes independently of a larger party wave. To understand the magnitude of this defection, one must appreciate the complete inversion of alliances since 2023. Back then, Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf ran on the NNPP ticket with Kwankwaso’s backing, while Gawuna carried the APC banner with Ganduje’s support. By 2027, the roles will likely reverse: Governor Yusuf is positioned to run under the APC with Ganduje’s blessing, while Gawuna is poised to run under the ADC with Kwankwaso’s endorsement.
From the perspective of the Kwankwasiyya movement, Gawuna’s arrival is a “return” rather than a “recruitment,” as he was part of the movement’s pioneer cohort. This narrative neutralizes accusations of opportunism. For his part, Gawuna framed his move in terms of service and divine guidance, with sources indicating he felt marginalized within the APC after his 2023 defeat.
The reaction from within the APC has been one of worry and regret. President Tinubu, recognizing the stakes, reportedly directed party leaders to prevent Gawuna’s move, even offering him an automatic Senatorial ticket for 2027. The failure of this pressure campaign, Gawuna reportedly placed his phone on “Do Not Disturb” and traveled abroad to avoid lobbyists represents a significant defeat for the presidency’s political management. This crisis prompted emergency meetings between President Tinubu, Dr. Ganduje, and Badaru Abubakar at the Presidential Villa to reorganize their strategy.
The long-term implication is the potential break of the APC-PDP duopoly. The ADC is now positioning itself as a genuine “third force” in the North-West. The defection of high-profile figures like Senator Ahmed Babba-Kaita, Senator Aishatu “Binani” Ahmed, and former Justice Minister Abubakar Malami suggests a coordinated realignment. This competition could force more substantive policy debates and reduce the “zero-sum” intensity of regional elections.
The projected 2027 gubernatorial rematch between Gawuna (ADC) and Governor Yusuf (APC) will be a battle between two men with established records. Voters will have a genuine choice between performance and platform rather than just shifting loyalties. As Gawuna put it: “Allah gives power to whom He wants and when He wants.” While the 2027 elections will reveal where that power flows, it is already clear that the political landscape of the North-West will never look the same again.
Politics
Governor Dauda Lawal Approves Gratuity Payment
Governor Dauda Lawal Approves Gratuity Payment
The Zamfara State Government, under the visionary leadership of Governor Dauda Lawal, has approved the release of funds for the payment of Gratuity Batch 3 for the 2024/25 period. This decisive action underscores the administration’s unwavering commitment to the welfare of retired civil servants who dedicated years of service to the state’s development.
The Accountant General of the State is already working diligently to ensure that all eligible retirees receive their payments promptly and efficiently, reflecting the government’s resolve to uphold transparency and accountability in the disbursement process.
This timely gratuity payment is a testament to Governor Dauda Lawal’s people-centered leadership, which recognizes the sacrifices and contributions of retirees to the progress and stability of Zamfara State. It also reaffirms the government’s pledge to honor its financial obligations without unnecessary delays.
The Zamfara State Government calls on all retirees in the affected batch to exercise patience as the necessary administrative and financial processes are finalized. Every effort is being made to ensure smooth and uninterrupted payments.
This initiative is part of Governor Dauda Lawal’s broader vision to empower citizens and retirees, strengthen confidence in public service, and sustain the morale of those who have committed their lives to the growth of Zamfara State.
Politics
APC Group Endorses Fubara for 2027, Calls on Tinubu and APC to Prioritise Performance Over Politics in Backing Governor’s Second Term Ambition
*APC Group Endorses Fubara for 2027, Calls on Tinubu and APC to Prioritise Performance Over Politics in Backing Governor’s Second Term Ambition*
The APC National Vanguard has appealed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) to support a second term in office for Siminalayi Fubara, citing what it described as “impressive and verifiable developmental strides” across Rivers State.
In a statement issued on Thursday by its National President, Dr Gbenga Salam (JP), the group said its position followed an extensive assessment tour of key infrastructure and public service projects executed under the Fubara administration.
The APC National Vanguard said the appeal was based strictly on performance, arguing that governance outcomes should outweigh partisan considerations, particularly in a state as economically significant as Rivers.
“We respectfully urge President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the leadership of the All Progressives Congress to support the continuity of Governor Siminalayi Fubara beyond his current tenure, in recognition of his commitment to development, prudent resource management, and people-focused governance,” the statement read.
According to the group, its delegation visited multiple project sites across the state, observing ongoing and completed works spanning road construction, urban renewal, and public infrastructure upgrades.
It noted that the scale and distribution of these projects reflect a deliberate effort by the state government to extend development beyond traditional urban centres and into underserved communities.
“Our findings from the tour reveal a government that is not only active but intentional in its development agenda. The execution of capital projects across various parts of Rivers State demonstrates a clear understanding of the needs of the people and a commitment to addressing them,” Dr Salam said.
The group particularly commended what it described as prudent financial management by the administration, noting that the projects reviewed showed evidence of careful planning and efficient allocation of resources.
“At a time when economic pressures are evident across the country, it is commendable that the Rivers State government has managed its resources in a way that delivers visible and impactful development without signs of fiscal recklessness,” the statement added.
The APC National Vanguard further observed that despite political tensions in the state, the Fubara administration has maintained focus on governance, ensuring continuity in project execution and service delivery.
The group argued that such stability is critical for sustained development and should be encouraged rather than disrupted.
“Leadership must ultimately be judged by results. In Rivers State, there is clear evidence of progress—projects that are not only announced but executed, and policies that translate into real benefits for citizens,” Dr Salam noted.
The group warned that discontinuity in leadership could stall ongoing projects and reverse gains already recorded, stressing the importance of allowing a performing administration to consolidate its achievements.
“Rivers State is at a pivotal stage where continuity will allow for the completion of ongoing initiatives and the deepening of development gains. Supporting Governor Fubara for a second term is, therefore, a decision in the best interest of the people,” the statement said.
In addition to its call on the APC leadership, the group reaffirmed its support for President Tinubu, expressing confidence in his administration’s broader economic and governance reforms.
The APC group urged Nigerians to remain supportive of efforts aimed at stabilising the economy and strengthening public institutions.
“We reiterate our endorsement of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for a second term in office, in recognition of his leadership and commitment to national development. With sustained support, the administration can consolidate its reform agenda for the benefit of all Nigerians,” Dr Salam added.
The APC National Vanguard concluded by calling on political actors to prioritise development and public interest over partisan divides, insisting that governance should always be guided by performance and accountability.
“Where leadership demonstrates prudence, delivers development, and remains focused on the welfare of the people, it deserves continuity. This is the position we have reached after a careful and independent assessment of Rivers State,” the statement added.
-
society7 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
news4 months agoWHO REALLY OWNS MONIEPOINT? The $290 Million Deal That Sold Nigeria’s Top Fintech to Foreign Interests
-
society7 months ago“You Are Never Without Help” – Pastor Gebhardt Berndt Inspires Hope Through Empower Church (Video)
-
celebrity radar - gossips2 months agoDr. Chris Okafor Returns with Power and Fire of the Spirit -Mounts Grace Nation Altar with Fresh Anointing and Restoration Grace on February 1, 2026


