Business
Investors Cautioned: Nestoil Towers Under Court Restraint, Not for Sale — Drawcok
Investors Cautioned: Nestoil Towers Under Court Restraint, Not for Sale — Drawcok
Drawcok Estate Limited has issued a formal public warning highlighting unlawful efforts to sell, lease, or assume control of the iconic Nestoil Towers in Victoria Island, Lagos, notwithstanding multiple court orders that restrain any dealings with the property.
In a detailed public notice released in Lagos, the company alerted potential buyers, investors, financial institutions, and the general public that the property located at 41/42 Akin Adesola Street and 60 Saka Tinubu Street, popularly known as Nestoil Towers, is currently the subject of ongoing litigation before both the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal.
Drawcok, the legal owner of the property, said it was compelled to issue the notice following recent “misleading and unlawful” representations by individuals allegedly acting on behalf of Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank) and others.
Although widely known as Nestoil Towers due to branding arrangements with its first tenant, the company clarified that all legal title to the land and the building—above and beneath the ground—belongs exclusively to Drawcok, not to Nestoil Limited or any bank.
At the centre of the dispute is Suit No. FHC/L/CS/1812/2024, in which the Federal High Court granted a binding order restraining GTBank, its agents, and assigns from transferring, leasing, selling, mortgaging, or otherwise dealing with the multi-storey commercial complex pending the determination of the suit.
Drawcok emphasised that the restraining order remains valid and has not been set aside or vacated.
The company further disclosed that multiple appeals—CA/LAG/PRE/ROA/CV/66M1/25; CA/LAG/PRE/ROA/CV/66M2/25; and CA/LAG/PRE/ROA/CV/161M1/25—are pending before the Court of Appeal, underscoring the complexity and ongoing nature of the cases.
According to the notice, individuals claiming to act under the authority of GTBank’s lead counsel in the subsisting suit have been approaching third parties and suggesting that they have a mandate to sell or lease the high-rise building.
Drawcok dismissed these claims as false, misleading, and legally unenforceable, insisting that no party is permitted to transact on the property in view of the binding court order.
The company also referenced another case, Suit No. FHC/L/CS/2127/2025, filed by FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited and First Trustees Limited against Nestoil Limited.
Drawcok said the FBN parties “wrongfully, whether by error or otherwise,” obtained an order purporting to seal or take control of the property.
It added that a purported Receiver, Abubakar Sulu-Gambari, SAN, has been taking actions that infringe on Drawcok’s proprietary rights, even though the company is not the judgment debtor in that matter.
In its strongest warning yet, Drawcok urged the public to disregard any communication from GTBank, its lawyers, the FBN parties, Sulu-Gambari, or any other individual claiming authority to sell, mortgage, transfer, or lease the property.
The company stressed that any person or entity entering into any commercial arrangement relating to the sale, purchase, lease, licence, or transfer of interest in the property does so entirely at their own risk.
Drawcok maintained that any such transaction will be considered null, void, and unenforceable, noting that the doctrine of lis pendens applies, given the multiple ongoing suits and appeals.
Reiterating the principle of caveat emptor (buyer beware), the company stated that Nestoil Towers is not available for sale, lease, mortgage, or any related transaction, and any advertisement or offer suggesting otherwise is fraudulent and should be ignored.
The notice concluded by stating that it was issued in good faith and in the interest of legal compliance. It warned that anyone who disregards the notice risks significant financial and economic loss, as Drawcok will not recognise or ratify any unauthorised transaction.
Business
Before You Buy Land This Ember Months in Nigeria, Read This Shocking Warning About Ibeju-Lekki – By Gbolahan Adetayo
Before You Buy Land This Ember Months in Nigeria, Read This Shocking Warning About Ibeju-Lekki – By Gbolahan Adetayo
As Ibeju-Lekki continues in its rapid rise as Africa’s fastest-growing real estate corridor, concerns are mounting over the increasing activities of land scammers targeting unsuspecting buyers, especially Nigerians in the diaspora returning home for the festive season.
Once a quiet suburb of Lagos, Ibeju-Lekki has transformed into a prime investment destination, driven by major infrastructural projects such as the Dangote Refinery, the Lekki Deep Seaport, and the proposed Lekki International Airport. These multibillion-naira developments have not only boosted commercial interest in the corridor but have also caused a dramatic spike in land value, turning the axis into a hotspot for real estate investors worldwide.
However, this boom has come with its own challenge and investment scammers are everywhere exploiting the Boom
Renowned Nigerian journalist, Gbolahan Adetayo has issued a strong warning to Nigerians abroad who intend to purchase land in Ibeju-Lekki during the upcoming Detty December holiday season. According to him, while genuine investors will return home eager to acquire property, others may fall prey to fraudulent individuals posing as real estate professionals.
“Christmas is almost here and the fact is that many Nigerians will smile to the bank, while others will return online shouting about being scammed after buying land from fake agents,” Adetayo cautioned.
“Shine your eyes. January is usually full of these heartbreaking complaints.”
Several cases of land fraud, illegal sales, and “Omo Onile” harassment have been reported in the media over the years, with victims particularly those abroad, losing millions to bogus companies.
The developer of the Seven Citadels of Joy tags Harmony Garden and Estate Developement is A Safer Option for not only Investors but for all Nigerians in Diaspora looking for Home Ownership Made Easy platform to become home owners at ease.
To help buyers avoid costly mistakes, Adetayo recommends sticking to trusted and verifiable developers. Among those he endorses are the estates owned by Harmony Garden and Estate Development Ltd, led by respected real estate entrepreneur Hon. Dr. Saheed Mosadoluwa a.k.a. Mr. Ibile and that is the man behind the 10,000 homes in 5 years initiative tags Ibile Traditional Mortgage System.
The recommended estates include as stated on the company official website : Home | Harmony Garden – Nigeria’s Most Trusted Real Estate Developer
Home | Harmony Garden – Nigeria’s Most Trusted Real Estate Developer
Secure land, property, and affordable housing with Harmony Garden. Trusted real estate developer in Lagos, Nigeria with flexible payment plans.
that house the seven estates which includes Granville Estate, Lekki Aviation Town, Majestic Bay, The Parliaments, Harmony Casa 2.0, Oju-Alaro GRA, and Harmonyville Estate all on Lekki-Epe Expressway, Ibeju-Lekki.
Harmony Garden is widely recognized for its zero-tolerance policy on corruption, land grabbing, and sharp practices issues that plague many parts of Ibeju-Lekki.
Why Harmony Garden Estates Keep Appreciating:
Beyond integrity, experts attribute the rising value of Harmony Garden estates to strategic land banking within Ibeju-Lekki’s development belt. The company’s estates are strategically positioned around critical infrastructure, such as:
Dangote Refinery, which is already reshaping industrial activity, Lekki Deep Seaport, boosting international trade, Lekki International Airport project, set to increase commercial traffic and residential demand, A rapidly expanding network of roads, industries, and residential hubs.
These factors have made the corridor one of Nigeria’s most lucrative real estate zones, with land prices rising significantly year after year.
Harmony Garden prides itself on transparency, ethical dealings, and long-term value creation. The company has earned national recognition as one of Nigeria’s top-selling real estate firms, focusing on quality, affordability, and accessible housing for all income levels.
“In an industry frequently tainted by fraudulent operators, Harmony Garden stands out for integrity,” Adetayo noted. “This is why I always recommend them for anyone buying property in Ibeju-Lekki.”
As Nigerians in the diaspora prepare to return for the festive holidays, the message is clear: invest wisely, verify every detail, and work only with trusted developers. With Ibeju-Lekki’s transformation accelerating, the stakes and the risks are higher than ever.
Business
Black Gold and Red Tape: The Legal Siege of Nestoil’s Assets
–Opaque Finance or Hostile Takeover? Nestoil challenges FBNQuest’s asset freeze over disputed $1bn claims
…Experts warn Nigeria risks scaring off global investors if fiduciary transparency collapses
Beneath the sun-scorched oilfields of OML 42, a high-stakes corporate drama is unfolding—one that could redefine confidence in Nigeria’s financial and judicial systems. At its center is a contentious $1 billion dispute involving Nestoil Limited, FBNQuest Merchant Bank, and a syndicate of lenders. What began as a routine request for clarity has morphed into a tangle of bank statements, ex parte court orders, and contested liabilities that now threatens investor sentiment in Africa’s largest economy.
For months, Nestoil says it repeatedly requested statements of account from FBNQuest and its lending partners to reconcile disputed figures exceeding $1.01bn and ₦430bn. Emails dating from February to June 2024, the company alleges, were ignored. That silence, Nestoil argues, was not a clerical lapse but a breach of fiduciary duty at a moment when transparency was critical.
As Facility Agent for the syndicated loan, FBNQuest is obligated to coordinate communication, monitor repayment schedules, and maintain accurate, accessible records. Instead, Nestoil says, the bank sidestepped these duties and raced to court. Without furnishing the requested statements, FBNQuest secured ex parte Mareva and receivership orders that froze Nestoil’s assets and shareholdings. These sweeping orders, Nestoil contends, were obtained without due process and executed while the company was actively seeking clarification.
In its court filings, Nestoil insists the debt figures relied on by FBNQuest are “incorrect and lack any proper basis.” The company is now mobilizing ten local and international forensic auditors to comb through its bank accounts nationwide—a decisive step aimed at uncovering the truth behind the disputed claims. “Only a proper forensic reconciliation would reveal whether we are indebted, and the precise amount, if any,” the company maintains.
Observers have raised eyebrows at the timing of FBNQuest’s move. Neconde, the Nestoil subsidiary tied directly to the facility, recently rebounded in production at OML 42 after years of setbacks. With renewed revenue flows, insiders argue, the asset has become a lucrative target. One source familiar with the matter went further: “This is an attempted hostile takeover of a producing oil asset,” suggesting that the legal escalation may be driven by motives beyond debt recovery.
The Mareva and receivership orders have already disrupted operations. Neconde’s production, logistics, and contracts remain frozen. The ripple effects have drawn the attention—and legal challenges—of foreign lenders and major banks with exposures to Neconde. Their filings raise broader questions about the neutrality of facility agents and security trustees, especially when such entities are affiliates of domestic lenders.
Seasoned bankers warn that the implications extend far beyond this dispute. In a financial ecosystem where trust underpins investment, the perception that facility agents can weaponize their role to seize assets sends a chilling signal. “If agents can turn adversarial under the guise of enforcement, global financiers will hesitate to fund indigenous companies,” one senior banker warned.
The legal issues are no less complex. Neconde insists its inclusion in FBNQuest’s orders is unlawful given its ongoing Federal High Court proceedings. Legal experts emphasize the need for caution when issuing ex parte orders in strategic industries like oil and gas. While such orders aim to preserve assets, they can destroy value—halting production, stalling payrolls, and endangering jobs. “Justice should not become a tool for asset conquest,” a Lagos-based commercial lawyer said.
Financial analysts argue the dispute exposes structural vulnerabilities in Nigeria’s banking system. Facility agents and trustees wield enormous power in syndicated loans, yet the regulatory oversight governing transparency and fairness appears insufficient. With Nigeria aggressively courting foreign investment in energy and infrastructure, cases like this risk eroding already fragile investor trust.
The human consequences are equally real. Beyond boardroom statements and court filings, the freeze impacts workers, contractors, and local communities dependent on OML 42. Production halts can delay salaries and disrupt local economies—raising the stakes of judicial restraint and responsible banking practices.
From a governance standpoint, Nestoil’s move to engage forensic auditors signals a commitment to transparency amid uncertainty. It underscores the need for rigorous record-keeping, independent verification, and clearly defined obligations in multi-party financing arrangements. If anything, the company’s stance is helping set a benchmark for corporate accountability in Nigeria’s financial landscape.
This dispute is also reshaping how facility agents are perceived. Meant to mediate between borrowers and lenders, these agents risk losing legitimacy if allegations of information asymmetry and opportunistic asset seizure hold weight. Transparent communication and adherence to fiduciary obligations are essential—not optional.
The broader system faces its own moment of reckoning. Without stronger regulatory oversight, clearer judicial guidelines, and stricter enforcement of fiduciary duties, similar crises may recur. For a country striving to present itself as a stable investment destination, the damage could be severe.
As the courts, banks, and auditors proceed, the outcome of this dispute will send a powerful message about Nigeria’s commitment to fairness, transparency, and due process. The battle over the $1 billion loan is more than a corporate disagreement; it is a test of the credibility of Nigerian institutions.
In the shadows of OML 42—where black gold flows and fortunes rise or fall—the Nestoil–FBNQuest conflict is a study in accountability, strategy, and the fragility of trust. It will be remembered not only for its legal twists, but for what it reveals about Nigeria’s financial architecture, the dangers of unchecked authority, and the resilience of indigenous companies navigating complex financial terrain.
For investors, bankers, and policymakers, the message is unmistakable: transparency is non-negotiable, fiduciary duties must be honored, and due process cannot be circumvented. Nigeria’s investment climate—and its global reputation—depends on it.
Business
The Siege on OML 42: Inside the Suspicious Legal Frenzy Targeting Nestoil and Neconde
The Siege on OML 42: Inside the Suspicious Legal Frenzy Targeting Nestoil and Neconde
Ex parte orders freeze billions in assets as oil firms fight to protect operations
A high-stakes battle threatening to upend Nigeria’s indigenous oil industry
On quiet days, OML 42 sleeps like a wounded giant in the swamps of the Niger Delta—its pipelines humming with the fading memory of roaring production, politics, and crude oil fortunes. But in recent weeks, the oilfield has become the epicentre of a legal hurricane so violent that it has shaken boardrooms from Lagos to London and rattled investor confidence in Nigeria’s fragile petroleum economy.
At the heart of the crisis sit Nestoil Limited, Neconde Energy, and an explosive mix of lenders, judges, regulators, lawyers, and petitioners—each tugging at an oil asset that once fed the national treasury with imperial abundance. What began as a routine debt-recovery move has spiralled into a sprawling legal war, punctuated by allegations of judicial overreach, suppressed facts, corporate asphyxiation, and fears of an orchestrated attempt to seize control of OML 42 through the courts.
What follows is the inside story of how sweeping ex parte orders froze billion-dollar assets, halted oil production, provoked foreign lenders, triggered judicial petitions, and raised the spectre of a catastrophic collapse with implications far beyond any courtroom.
—
A Single Order That Shook the Oil Sector
It began quietly on October 20, 2025, when FBNQuest Merchant Bank and First Trustees filed an ex parte motion. By October 22, Justice Dehinde Dipeolu of the Federal High Court, Lagos, had granted one of the broadest Mareva injunctions in recent Nigerian corporate history.
The order froze all bank accounts, shares, and assets of Nestoil, Neconde, and related companies—effectively paralysing a multi-billion-dollar group with strategic footprints in engineering, oil services, and upstream petroleum.
The plaintiffs claimed the companies owed $1.01 billion and ₦430 billion. The defendants said the figures were unverified, inflated, and grossly misleading.
Yet without hearing from the companies, the court ordered a blanket freeze, sweeping through commercial banks like a harmattan storm and locking out executives and signatories overnight.
Even more controversially, the ex parte order empowered a receiver/manager, and allegedly authorised the Nigerian Navy and DSS to enforce the civil directives—a move critics say militarises what is essentially a commercial dispute.
For Neconde, operator of OML 42 with roughly 40,000 barrels per day, the effect was devastating:
production collapsed to zero.
—
Neconde: “We Do Not Owe a Kobo.”
Shocked by the freeze, Neconde insisted it is not indebted under the syndicated loan that forms the basis of the plaintiffs’ claims:
It was neither borrower nor guarantor.
It already has an active winding-up proceeding (FHC/CP/1439/2025), which under CAMA 2020 protects it from fresh lawsuits or enforcement without leave of court.
Any order against it, therefore, is “null, void, and of no effect.”
Neconde accused the plaintiffs of:
Dragging it into a dispute that doesn’t concern it
Judicial overreach
Wrongful interference with third-party rights
Causing the shutdown of an oilfield critical to national revenue
—
Foreign Lenders Enter the Battlefield
The crisis escalated dramatically when foreign lenders stormed the courtroom.
Glencore Energy UK Limited, Fidelity Bank, Mauritius Commercial Bank, and the Africa Finance Corporation—senior creditors behind a $640 million syndicated facility—warned that Justice Dipeolu’s orders threaten the very foundation of international financing for Nigeria’s indigenous oil sector.
Represented by Olufemi Oyewole, SAN, they argued:
The plaintiffs obtained the injunction by concealing the existence of the senior secured loan.
The Deed of Charge relied upon by the plaintiffs is subordinate to the lenders’ security documents.
Freezing Neconde’s accounts jeopardises repayment of their facility.
Nigeria risks massive reputational damage if court orders can override established security hierarchies.
Their intervention reframed the matter as a test of whether Nigeria is still a safe jurisdiction for international oil financing.
—
Petitions to the Chief Judge—and an Embattled Judiciary
Then came the most explosive turn.
Petitions flooded the office of the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court and the National Judicial Council, accusing Justice Dipeolu of judicial excess. Among the allegations:
Issuing sweeping orders over assets whose ownership was unclear
Involving military agencies (Navy and DSS) in enforcement of civil orders
Freezing assets of Neconde despite ongoing winding-up proceedings
Allowing crude sales under a receivership arrangement in violation of the preservative nature of interim injunctions
On November 7, Justice Dipeolu admitted receiving the petitions and suspended further proceedings pending the Chief Judge’s directive on whether he should continue or recuse himself.
What started as routine debt recovery had now grown into an institutional crisis threatening judicial credibility.
—
Nestoil and Neconde Fight Back
The companies responded with a strong counteroffensive.
They accused the plaintiffs of suppressing a critical fact:
a Common Terms Agreement executed in December 2022, under which the alleged debts were restructured with a fresh 10-year repayment plan.
Other key defence arguments:
FBNQuest allegedly refused to provide account statements for over three years, making the debt unverifiable.
The receiver appointed by the plaintiffs is allegedly not registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission, contrary to CAMA.
The sweeping order froze personal accounts of directors—an act they call illegal and vindictive.
Nestoil Tower, an iconic, immovable property in Victoria Island, was frozen unnecessarily, suggesting an attempt at strategic seizure.
The companies warned that the consequences of these actions are fatal:
OML 42 shutdown
Collapse of corporate operations
Interruption of contractual obligations with the Federal Government
Severe revenue losses to Nigeria
—
A Dark Suspicion: Is Someone Trying to Seize OML 42?
In industry circles, a troubling theory has taken root:
that the entire legal drama may be a covert corporate raid designed to take over OML 42 through judicial means.
Fueling this suspicion:
The breadth of the ex parte orders
Attempted crude-sale authorisations
Military involvement
Disregard of winding-up protections
A sweeping receivership with overreaching powers
Complete paralysis of accounts and operations
Nigeria has seen similar corporate warfare before—where interim injunctions were weaponised for strategic acquisition. Whether true or not, the speculation reflects the deep mistrust that shadows high-value commercial disputes in the country.
—
Why This Matters for Nigeria
OML 42 is not an ordinary asset.
In the 1970s, it produced nearly 250,000 barrels per day—one of Nigeria’s crown jewels.
Today, Nigeria’s struggling oil industry faces:
declining production
massive divestments
chronic vandalism
evaporating investment
A prolonged shutdown of OML 42 would be catastrophic.
Foreign lenders are watching. International oil financiers are watching. Indigenous operators are watching.
If a single ex parte order—delivered without hearing from affected companies—can halt a producing oilfield overnight, the message to global capital is chilling.
—
A Nation on the Edge of a Precedent
The case now sits in a tense limbo, awaiting the Chief Judge’s directive on whether Justice Dipeolu will continue or step aside.
What happens next is critical.
For Nestoil and Neconde, it is a fight for survival.
For senior lenders, it is a defence of global financing principles.
For the judiciary, it is a test of integrity and restraint.
For Nigeria, it is a moment of reckoning.
Will the rule of law steady the ship—or will this become another cautionary tale in Nigeria’s turbulent oil industry?
For now, OML 42 lies quiet, its wells dormant, its pipelines still, a sleeping colossus held hostage by the uncertain rhythms of law, power, and ambition.
-
Politics5 months agoNigeria Is Not His Estate: Wike’s 2,000‑Hectare Scandal Must Shake Us Awake
-
society6 months agoOGUN INVESTS OVER ₦2.25 BILLION TO BOOST AQUACULTURE
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoFrom ₦200 to ₦2 Million: Davido’s Barber Reveals Jaw-Dropping Haircut Fee
-
society5 months agoJUSTICE DENIED: HOW JESAM MICHAEL’S KINDNESS WAS TURNED AGAINST HIM

