Connect with us

society

MAUREEN AND SOWORE A DISGRACE TO JOURNALISM

Published

on

MAUREEN BADEJO SUFFERS ANOTHER HISTORIC DEFEAT AS SHE LOSES APPEAL AGAINST MFM IN THE UK

MAUREEN AND SOWORE A DISGRACE TO JOURNALISM

I had always been a huge fan of your work but for some time now, a lot has changed. After seeing this statement credited to Omoyele Sowore of Sahara Reporters and published in a rag-tag online tabloid belonging to Maureen Badejo’s GIO Tv as reported on April 3, 2021, by one Isaac Obasi coupled with the fact that I haven’t gotten over your expulsion from the ACC, I suddenly realized that the young man has lost it.

I would ordinarily have ignored this as another silly rant by a washed-out gutter journalist seeking attention and relevance from every quarter but for certain dangerous misinformation touted by him in his quoted comments, I decided to respond.

I am an investigative journalist who has followed up series of Sowore’s attacks on MFM and its General Overseer Dr. D. K. Olukoya, spanning back since 2002/2003 when we read that a group of reporters gate-crashed MFM Cross-over service and without prior accreditation, walked straight towards the pulpit and started filming when Dr. Olukoya had already mounted the pulpit for the sermon of the day.

From that report, we could remember that it was the trying period of the country when terrorists were going about bombing churches. Hence, uniformed and plain-clothed security agents were detailed to guard and protect such gatherings.

It was told that in that write-up that the Security personnel on duty that day perceived the advancement of unknown men with gadgets walking towards the pulpit when preaching was ongoing and moved to stop their further advancement and redirected them to the area reserved for accredited journalists. But, as we read a certain young man amongst them, took offense and this happened to be Sowore Omoleye.

It was said that he took offense because his self-conceited larger-than-life image had been insulted. And after a few days, I can still remember reading about some high-polluting fiction about being detained by the Church at an alleged detention center and all manner of defamatory statements published by his media organization.

Since then, all I read about his publications about MFM and Dr. Olukoya has been filth, to the extent that he claimed that Olukoya offered him money for his political campaign in one of his many YouTube videos, which is obviously a standard lie.

In 2018, I read about a fallout between these two parties where MFM and Dr. Olukoya seemed to have been tired of tolerating Sowore’s verbal diarrhea and commenced a libel suit against him in the High Court of Justice, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State in Suit No.HU/250/2018 Upon being served with the processes, we gathered that he published further defamation and earned another Suit No. H/U312/2018 in the same judiciary.

Upon being served with processes in the second suit, he granted an interview in which, like Maureen, he lambasted the Judiciary of Akwa Ibom State and poured more filth on MFM and Dr. Olukoya thus a third Libel suit No. HU/15/2019 was filed against him.

Through our investigation, we realized that after employing the same tactics of denying service as Maureen Badejo attempted to employ in the suit under discussion, he retained the services of Barr. Inibehe Effiong whose colleague in Uyo “happened” to be in court on the date MFM lawyers were to move a motion for judgment in default of appearance and defense.

It is said that Processes in the suits had been served on Sowore and received at the premises of the Media Hub at 13A, Isaac John Street, Ikeja GRA which also housed Sahara Reporters Media Foundation, an NGO of which he is the primary Trustee, yet Sowore, through his lawyers denied service and having any ties to that address.

We gathered, through our investigation that He removed his name and photograph as Founder & Chief Executive from the website of Media Hub and substituted It with one Lakeisha Landrum, erstwhile Vice President, Global Partnerships.

Information we got stated that Ime Asanga Esq., Lawyer to MFM and Dr. Olukoya in those cases perceived that the issue of service was going to be used as a talisman to defeat the prompt hearing of the substantive cases on their merits, so he filed a Notice of Discontinuance in each of those cases and same were each struck out.

IN ESSENCE, MFM AND DR. OLUKOYA WITHDREW THE CASES FROM COURT NOT THAT THEY WERE DISMISSED.

It was further told to us that the withdrawal of the cases was a strategy to re-file the three cases as one mega suit AFTER DISCOVERING SOWORE’S UNDISPUTED ADDRESS IN NIGERIA.

THAT MEGA SUIT ENCOMPASSING THE CLAIMS IN THE THREE WITHDRAWN CASES WAS SAID TO HAVE BEEN FILED ON 15TH NOVEMBER 2019 AS SUIT NO. HU/349/2019.

At that period, Sowore was being incarcerated at the Department of State Services, Abuja.

it was told that the lawyer for MFM and Dr. Olukoya filed and was granted the leave of court to serve him either at the Department of State Services, Aso Drive, Abuja, or at his undisputed address at No. 1 Mosafejo Street, Kiribo, Ondo State of Nigeria being the address he supplied to the Corporate Affairs Commission when he was registering Sahara Reporters Media Foundation.

A bailiff of the High Court of Akwa Ibom State was already in Abuja to serve the processes on Sowore at the D.S.S office BUT DR. Olukoya INSTRUCTED THAT SERVICE SHOULD NOT BE AFFECTED SO AS NOT TO ADD TO HIS TRAVAILS AT THAT TIME. Perhaps the matter would have ended there but now that Sowore has by his utterances awoken it, IT IS SAID THAT HE WILL SOON BE SERVED ORIGINATING PROCESSES.

We further probed this matter and realized that the case in Nigeria has no connection with the case he is facing in the United States. The entities in the United States that he defamed could not have joined in the suit in Nigeria hence the Suit in the United States.

Sowore is also quoted in the report to have said “It is so sad how poor people’s tithes and offerings are used to protect the reputation of a man who tells you to pray when your stomach is assaulted with hunger!..” well this statement is rather vague.

If you do proper investigation before releasing statements you will always get your facts rights, the facts are there for anybody who cares to confirm. Dr. Olukoya is a scientist and a prolific and accomplished author and a minister of God, with books selling worldwide.

He earns and/or receives nothing from the coffers of the Church rather he spends from his publications’ royalties on the needs of the Church; the man has his integrity and reputation to protect. I can tell you this because I have followed up on this matter from the inception of Maureen’s unfounded allegations.

In that statement published on GIOTV blog, it also red and I quote “A case in which the defendant in the case was never even served the summons and here is Punch celebrating injustice against a blogger…shame!.” Oga Sowore you messed up big time on this one, there is video evidence of Maureen Badejo claiming she was duly served all letters and was aware of the hearings but ignored or rather treated them with levity. This you can find online and I wonder why almighty Sowore didn’t do his research.

Sowore has lavished invectives on the Judgment of the High Court of Ogun state against Maureen Badejo insinuating that Dr. Olukoya obtained it from an Ogun State Judge without due process.

Any intelligent person who lays claim to journalism ought properly to investigate the registry of the Court to speak with knowledge and authority.

A cursory search at the High Court Registry at Abeokuta would have revealed to him that DHL posted proofs of Delivery which clearly shows that Maureen Badejo personally signed for and received ALL the court processes and Hearing Notices, without exception.

The discerning public will do well to read the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division in Suit No. CA/L/923/2013: Debola Nejo (Maureen’s mother) V. Access Bank Plc; Niracon Engineering Nigeria Ltd; Mrs. Maureen Omorinola Badejo; Engr. Niran Badejo (Maureen’s estranged husband) it is reported in Law Pavilion Electronic Law Report as (2019) LPELR-47960 particularly pages 27 and 28 of the electronic report and discover that Maureen’s attribute as an artful dodger of court proceedings has received judicial notice by the Courts.

All these are however fish wives’ tales. The judgment has already been registered in the Queens Bench Division of the High Court in England and Maureen has been given 28 days to show cause why it should not be enforced against her. At least a window of opportunity has again been afforded her to prove that it is DHL, not her who is lying on the issue of service.

Sowore also poured muck on us journalists when he said that Dr. Olukoya funds Nigerian newspapers to make people feel he won a case. As a man thinketh so is he. It takes only a twisted mind steeped in brown-envelope quack journalism to make such a sweeping statement because he uses his own poor standards to measure others.

Sowore, wake up, and smell the coffee. You have lost every modicum of credibility and respect you may have had at the inception of your career you were once our star but not anymore.

Everyone now knows you for what you are…an egocentric, rent-seeking rabble-rouser, hungry for relevance and recognition. Nobody takes you seriously anymore, maybe the Babalawo Association of Nigeria.

Only the likes of Maureen and her minions would still describe you as “Foremost rights activist, pro-democracy campaigner” but that as well is gone! Remember the humiliation and rejection you suffered when you showed up to join the #ENDSARS campaign? That is your reality.

Sowore and Maureen Badejo are birds of a feather. They like to beat the worn-out drum, that MFM and Dr. Olukoya are running from jurisdiction to jurisdiction to commence the same case. The end of those cases will always bear out who is fooling who. MAUREEN GOT HERS, LET’S WAIT AND SEE WHAT COMES WITH YOURS

Femi Oyewale

society

Rivers 2027: Niger Delta Group Endorses Kingsley Chinda as Rainbow Coalition Candidate

Published

on

*Rivers 2027: Niger Delta Group Endorses Kingsley Chinda as Rainbow Coalition Candidate*

*…Applauds Wike For Enthroning Inclusive Democratic Culture*

 

 

The Niger Delta Development Ambassadors (NDDA) has endorsed Kingsley Ogundu Chinda (aka OK Chinda) as a consensus candidate of the emerging “Rainbow Coalition” ahead of the 2027 governorship election in Rivers State.

 

The group said Chinda possesses the political experience, legislative exposure, and cross-party acceptability required to consolidate the coalition’s broader objective of stability, inclusive governance, and development in the state.

 

In a statement issued on Sunday and signed by King David Attah, national president of the organisation, the NDDA also commended Nyesom Wike, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), for his role in fostering a more inclusive democratic culture through the coalition arrangement currently gaining momentum in Rivers politics.

 

The organisation described the Rainbow Coalition as a strategic political alignment involving multiple political interests and parties working together beyond partisan divisions for the collective development of Rivers state.

 

According to the group, the coalition model reflects political maturity and could help reduce the prolonged tensions and divisive politics that have affected governance and democratic stability in the state in recent years.

 

“The Rainbow Coalition represents a significant shift from politics driven solely by rivalry and exclusion to a broader culture of accommodation, consultation, and collective responsibility,” the statement read.

 

“We commend the minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, for encouraging a political environment where different political tendencies can work together in pursuit of stability and development.”

 

The group said Chinda, who currently represents Obio/Akpor Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, has remained one of the few political figures with relationships cutting across various blocs in Rivers politics.

 

According to the NDDA, his experience within the National Assembly and his understanding of governance, lawmaking, and public administration position him as a credible figure capable of sustaining political balance within the coalition structure.

 

The organisation added that Rivers State requires leadership capable of unifying competing political interests while prioritising infrastructure, economic growth, youth development, and security.

 

“Rt Hon Kingsley Chinda has demonstrated capacity, political maturity, and the ability to engage across divides. At this critical point in Rivers politics, the state requires consensus builders rather than politicians driven by bitterness and endless conflict,” Attah said.

 

The group also praised the conduct of the APC primaries in Rivers state, describing the process so far as peaceful, orderly, and reflective of growing democratic maturity among political stakeholders.

 

According to the NDDA, the relatively calm atmosphere surrounding the primaries contrasts sharply with the tension and instability that have historically characterised political contests in the state.

 

The organisation urged political actors across party lines to sustain the atmosphere of restraint and cooperation as alignments ahead of 2027 continue to evolve.

 

It added that the success of the Rainbow Coalition would ultimately depend on its ability to place governance, development, and the welfare of Rivers people above narrow political interests.

 

The group further called on youths and community leaders in the state to support initiatives capable of promoting peace, political inclusion, and long-term stability ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Continue Reading

society

A DEFINING MOMENT IN THE WAR AGAINST TERROR: WHY THE ELIMINATION OF ABU-BILAL AL-MINUKI MUST MARK A TURNING POINT

Published

on

A DEFINING MOMENT IN THE WAR AGAINST TERROR: WHY THE ELIMINATION OF ABU-BILAL AL-MINUKI MUST MARK A TURNING POINT

By

Brigadier General Sani Kukasheka Usman (rtd) mni fnipr

 

 

The reported neutralisation of Abu-Bilal Al-Minuki, described as the second-in-command of the so-called Islamic State (ISIS) globally and one of the most influential commanders of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), along with scores of other terroristts, through a joint operation involving the Armed Forces of Nigeria and the United States military, represents an extraordinary milestone in the long and arduous countertrerrosim efforts and war against terrorism in Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin. If sustained and properly consolidated, this unprecedented feat may well be remembered as one of the most consequential counter-terrorism successes in our national history.

 

For over one and a half decades, Nigeria has borne the devastating burden of terrorism unleashed by Boko Haram and its splinter groups, particularly ISWAP. Thousands of innocent citizens have lost their lives. Communities have been destroyed, livelihoods disrupted, and millions displaced. Military units, critical national infrastructure, schools, places of worship and entire communities have repeatedly come under attack. Yet, despite these painful realities, the resilience of the Nigerian people and the courage, sacrifices and professionalism of the Armed Forces of Nigeria have remained steadfast and optimistic.

 

Against this backdrop, the reported precision air-land operation conducted at Metele in Borno State under the auspices of the Joint Task Force (North East), Operation HADIN KAI, in close collaboration with the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), deserves commendation and national recognition beyond just the newspaper headlines and breaking news. The operation, according to official statements from Nigerian authorities, was the culmination of painstaking intelligence gathering, surveillance, target acquisition and operational planning. Such coordination, reportedly involving precision strikes and ground force containment measures, demonstrates the increasing sophistication and maturity of Nigeria’s counter-insurgency efforts and architecture.

 

What makes this operation particularly significant is not merely the elimination of a high-profile terrorist leader, but the symbolism and strategic consequences attached to it. If indeed Abu-Bilal Al-Minuki occupied the exalted but ignoble operational position attributed to him within the ISIS global network, then his elimination sends a clear message to terrorist organisations everywhere: there will be no sanctuary for those who orchestrate violence against innocent populations and sovereign nations.

 

It is therefore fitting to commend President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, for providing strategic leadership and political support to the Armed Forces in prosecuting the counter-insurgency campaign. His public acknowledgement of the operation and appreciation of international collaboration demonstrates a leadership posture committed to national security and international partnerships.

 

Equally deserving of commendation are the Ministers of Defence, Chief of Defence Staff, Service Chiefs, officers and soldiers of the Armed Forces of Nigeria (AFN), and other security forces, particularly troops of Operation HADIN KAI, whose courage, resilience and professionalism have continued to deny terrorists freedom of action in the North East theatre. The sacrifices of these brave men and women, often operating under extremely difficult conditions and in hostile terrain, should never be taken for granted. They continue to stand as the last line of defence between law-abiding citizens and forces of chaos. The leadership and command of Operation HADIN KAI and the support of well meaning annd law abiding people of the north east deserve a pat on the back.

 

The operational and intelligence personnel involved in this mission, including air and ground components, also deserve special recognition. Successful counter-terrorism operations of this nature are rarely accidental. They are products of meticulous planning, sustained surveillance, inter-agency cooperation, operational discipline and strategic patience. That the operation was reportedly executed without casualties or loss of assets further attests to the professionalism, competence and preparedness of the personnel involved.

 

The role of the United States government and military authorities also merits acknowledgement. Counter-terrorism today is increasingly transnational in nature, requiring intelligence sharing, technological cooperation and operational synergy among partners. Terrorists and insurgent organisations exploit societal vulnerabilities, porous borders, digital networks, illicit financing and regional instability. Consequently, no nation can effectively confront such threats in isolation. The reported cooperation between Nigeria and the United States, therefore, serves as a worthy model of strategic partnership in confronting shared security challenges.

 

Indeed, the commendation reportedly issued by President Donald J Trump on the operation and the collaborative disposition of both nations reinforces the importance of international solidarity in defeating violent extremism. Terrorism is not merely Nigeria’s problem; it is a global menace that threatens international peace, economic stability and human security.

 

However, while this development deserves celebration, it must not lead to complacency. History teaches us that terrorist groups are adaptive, opportunistic and often quick to regenerate leadership structures after suffering battlefield setbacks. Therefore, the elimination of a major commander and a handful of his loyalists, however significant, must be viewed as a strategic opportunity to intensify and consolidate gains rather than a signal of mission accomplished.

 

This is why the Armed Forces of Nigeria, Operation HADIN KAI and the Multinational Joint Task Force must seize this momentum to relentlessly pursue remnants of Boko Haram and ISWAP elements across the Lake Chad Basin, Mandara Mountains and anywhere else. Follow-on operations, sustained intelligence exploitation, denial of safe havens and coordinated offensives must continue with renewed vigour. Terrorist regrouping must be prevented at all costs.

 

More importantly, there is an urgent need to deepen and expand collaborative efforts with neighbouring countries, particularly Cameroon, Chad and the Niger Republic, under the framework of the Multinational Joint Task Force. Terrorism in the Lake Chad Basin is regional in character and therefore demands regional solutions. Criminal and terrorist elements exploit border vulnerabilities, governance gaps and local grievances to sustain their activities. Stronger military cooperation, intelligence fusion, joint patrols, clearance operations and harmonised operational strategies among these countries are therefore indispensable.

 

At the same time, Nigerians themselves must recognise that the fight against insurgency is not the sole responsibility of the military or the security forces alone. Citizens have important roles to play through vigilance, information sharing, community resilience and support for lawful authorities. Intelligence provided by local communities has repeatedly proven decisive in disrupting terrorist activities. Communities must therefore reject fear and refuse to provide shelter, sympathy or logistical support to violent extremists.

 

Likewise, political leaders, traditional rulers, religious leaders, public opinion moulders, civil society organisations and the media must continue to support national counter-terrorism objectives through constructive engagement, public sensitisation and responsible communication. We must eschew divisive, unsubstantiated and demoralising statements. Terrorists thrive on propaganda, misinformation and fear. Society must deny them these advantages.

 

As a retired senior military officer who proudly and gallantly took part in the counterinsurgency efforts and has closely observed Nigeria’s security trajectory and understands the sacrifices of our troops, I remain cautiously optimistic. The destruction of Boko Haram and ISWAP is possible. It is difficult, certainly, but it is achievable and doable. Other nations have confronted seemingly intractable terrorist threats and prevailed through persistence, coordination, technological superiority, political will and public support.

 

The present military and security architecture leadership and the brave troops on the frontlines have before them a historic opportunity. Posterity would remember them favourably if, in their time, they achieve what many Nigerians have long prayed for: the complete dismantling of Boko Haram and ISWAP insurgents and terror networks and the restoration of enduring peace to the North East and beyond.

 

This latest operation should therefore not merely be seen as a tactical victory. It should be treated as a defining strategic moment and opportunity, a morale booster for troops, a warning to terrorists, and a rallying point for national and regional unity against extremism.

 

Nigeria has paid dearly in blood, treasure and collective trauma. The time has come to finish this fight decisively.

 

May God continue to bless and protect the Armed Forces of Nigeria, security agencies and all those working tirelessly for peace and security in our nation.

 

The writer, Brigadier General Sani Kukasheka Usman (rtd) mni fnipr fapra fnarc FIOARM fspsp, is a renowned strategic communication, public relations and security expert. He is a former Director of Army Public Relations and spokesman of the Nigerian Army, former National Publicity Secretary of the Alumni Association of the National Institute (AANI), and Consultant Director, Corporate Affairs and Information Services, Nigerian Army Resource Centre, Abuja.

Continue Reading

society

SHAME ! FREE BARABAS PARADE OF “BISHOPS” ON ABUJA STREETS

Published

on

SHAME ! FREE BARABAS PARADE OF “BISHOPS” ON ABUJA STREETS.

 

 

It was a mingling of people wearing shorts and T-shirts together with about four wearing may be newly sewed cassocks with the leader putting up a James Bond like sun glasses all trying to masquerade themselves as Bishops and servants of the Most High GOD yet what they were asking for was evil, the freedom for a person declared wanted by the EFCC for obtaining money by false pretence in conjunction with another person already apprehended.

THE NOMENCLATURE:

Nobody would have cared if charlatans had gathered themselves for such oddity in poking their nose into a criminal matter already situated within the powers of a High Court in Abuja but the shame of it all was that the motley crowd that came out protesting on the streets of Abuja held itself out as a ” College of Bishops and Peace Initiative Movement” led by one supposed Bishop Abel King of no church name or address.

An ordinary Google check of the name touted by the so called College of Bishops shows that they are virtually non existent except for this there single street corner outing where they are trying to disrupt and becloud the course of justice.

Their leader, one Bishop Abel King, did not deem it fit like a truly called into God’s vineyard servant to address the Press Briefing in his church or other befitting compound but like the crowd of Pharisaic incited gatherings, comparable to the one at the Court of Pontius Pilate, came shouting “Free Barabas !” at a street corner in Abuja. The placards they carried showed which side they belong to. The strong suspicion is that this gathering are not a gathering of those entrenched in the House of God but mere charlatans serving the purpose, whims and caprices of a wanted person going by the nomenclature of HRH Halimat Adenike Tejuoso.

THEIR GROUSE:

What they stated as their grouse of protest is stated in online reports as mainly that, “the organization… expressed concern over a petition reportedly filed by Prophetess Sholoye at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission describing it as selective and misleading in light of claims surrounding the financial transactions”. The supposed College of Bishops who should in normal circumstances live above board described the petition against Olori Tejuoso as “selective, unfair and misleading” ! Can you beat that ?!

A College of Bishops is protesting and commenting on a petition that has gone beyond a mere petition but squarely a matter that a High Court has taken control of ? Who is really advising this guys ? Don’t they know that the matter has become sub judice ?

THE CAN PETITION:

Nothing stops even individuals from forwarding petitions to the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) but a College of Bishops and Peace Initiative Movement tendering a petition to CAN from a street corner is nothing but terribly childish and devoid of normal protocol. They could have submitted their petition to CAN and use decorous means of presenting their dilemma.

It also seems that whoever is directing the charade and drama of the College of Bishops did not inform them of the basic facts or rather they are solely relying on the explanations dished out by the accused person, HRH Tejuoso. For one will even ask what’s wrong for a Christian to seek the way forward from the Holy Spirit ? What takes away the ability of a Christian to seek legal means of advancing their livelihood ? What stops a Christian from entering into legal agreements that stipulates that refunds shall be made if the lobby goes down south ? It really seems the College of Bishops were not following the dictates of the Holy Bible to seek the truth and follow same. They have chosen to seemingly follow the dictates of whoever is behind their charade.

Moreover, the “Bishops” attached to their nomenclature, that they were apart from being a College of Bishops were also a peace initiative movement. But, one dare ask where’s the movement for peace in all they’ve done when they came out carrying placards that a victim should be disciplined while they seemingly protest for the release of the suspect from the claws of the anti corruption agency. Where’s the peace initiative in that ?

The “Bishops” were bold enough to announce that the money collected by HRH Halimat Tejuoso were “funds…. knowingly routed through mutually agreed channels”. Who exactly informed them that the funds were given to mutually agreed people ? How do they arrive at this ? Are they now assuming the role of the Court trying the matter ?

CYBER BULLYING ?

The College of Bishops led by their leader and probably the speaker at the street protest said that their protest and petition “is not persecution. This is accountability.” One dare ask whether this is not cyber bullying since their protest has found its way onto the social media. They can be said with the inscriptions on the placards they carried that they were out to “fry” the person they came out to protest against. Their behavior has no semblance except to that in the Bible where the multitude gathered at the Court of Pontius Pilate shouted “Free Barabas !!!” when the call was made on whether to release the accused or the convicted. It seems the first century is being acted live in the 21st century.

Lastly, we want to advise the College of Bishops and in the same vein the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) that this matter being pushed by the so called College of Bishops is a matter sitting pretty under the jurisdiction of a competent court of law and actions such as the one being perpetrated by the Bishops is sub judice and may attract the wrath of the Court for contempt. The Court should be allowed to do its job. Let justice be allowed to flow.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending