Connect with us

society

Move Fast or Face the Consequence: A Call to Stop Terror, Not Muslims

Published

on

Move Fast or Face the Consequence: A Call to Stop Terror, Not Muslims. By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyNG.com

Move Fast or Face the Consequence: A Call to Stop Terror, Not Muslims.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyNG.com

 

“The Real Message of Donald Trump’s Warning to Nigeria and Why Some Choose to Misinterpret It.”

 

The uproar surrounding Donald Trump’s recent warning to Nigeria begs a fundamental question: Are we twisting his words or ignoring the hard truth he sought to highlight? Trump did not declare war on Muslims. He did not call for the overthrow of the Nigerian government. What he did say was blunt and targeted, “MOVE FAST, STOP THE KILLINGS, PROTECT NIGERIANS” and that message should reverberate across this troubled nation.

Move Fast or Face the Consequence: A Call to Stop Terror, Not Muslims. By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyNG.com

On 1 November 2025, President Trump designated Nigeria as a “COUNTRY of PARTICULAR CONCERN” for alleged violations of religious freedom and posted.

“If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities.”

He added:
“If we attack, it will be fast, vicious and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians. WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST”

Look at that language: it does not say “we are coming for Muslims”; it says “we may act against terrorist actors if Nigeria fails to protect its citizens.” The conditional “IF” is not a declaration of war, but a wake-up call. And to anyone who says it targets Muslims, you must ask, why assume religious identity when the actor is identified as “TERRORISTS”?

The core message “A demand for accountability.”
The key line is this “Move fast, if you don’t, the United States will step in.” That sentence lays responsibility clearly at the door of the Nigerian authorities. It says; it is your turn first. If you fail, others may do what you didn’t. And, this should not be controversial. Consider these facts:

Nigeria faces a multi-front security crisis: from long-running insurgency by Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) in the northeast, to farmer-herder clashes across the Middle Belt and widespread banditry.

According to the human-conflict monitor ACLED, among nearly 1,923 attacks on civilians in Nigeria in a given year, only about 50 were directly linked to victims due to Christian identity, a sobering reminder that the violence is not purely religious in nature, though sometimes portrayed that way.

Nigeria’s own government has rejected the claim it is religiously intolerant, with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu insisting the country protects citizens of all faiths and that the violence is complex and inter-sectarian.

Thus, the message from Trump (whether one supports his style or not) is Nigeria, you must act, you have not acted enough and the cost of continued inaction will be external pressure. That is what he said. Not “WE HATE MUSLIMS”; “WE HATE TERROR.”

Why some distort the message. In my view, the twisting of this message comes from two sources:

Beneficiaries of the status quo. Those who profit (politically, economically or socially) from Nigeria’s slow-motion collapse in many regions will fear exposure. A foreign-led threat to “STEP IN” acts as a catalyst for change they would rather avoid.

The uninformed about reality. Many commentators leap to slogans and labels without disaggregating the actors, the ethnic dynamics, the local militias, the failings of governance. They assume religious framing instead of nuance and so wind up mis-interpreting or mis-representing statements like this.

If you cannot point to perpetrators, if you cannot demonstrate arrests, prosecutions and accountability; then your outrage rings hollow.

Take the specific atrocities you mention, the burning of homes and destruction of entire communities in places such as Yelwata, Bokkos or Taraba. If the victims were destroyed and displaced, how many perpetrators have been ARRESTED, PARADED, TRIED and CONVICTED? That profound lack of accountability is what undercuts Nigeria’s credibility.

When terror actors roam free and their sponsors (whether STATE-LINKED, MILITIA-LINKED or OTHERWISE) operate with impunity, the weakness is not just in one region; but a national crisis.

Why Trump’s demand matters. Let us not mince words, Nigeria is at a crossroads. If the killing continues unchecked, if entire villages vanish and communities are left to fend for themselves, the result is not only humanitarian catastrophe, but a breakdown of state legitimacy.

Renowned analysts warn that Nigeria’s diplomacy and governance are under strain. According to the Atlantic Council, the designation of Nigeria as a CPC and Trump’s threat mark “a diplomatic alarm bell” for Nigeria’s leadership, “unless Abuja demonstrates measurable improvements.”

Here is what is at stake:

Rule of law: When villages are razed without recourse or justice, the contract between citizen and state shatters.

Inter-religious harmony: When violence portrays itself as “Christian vs Muslim” but in fact cuts across minorities and majorities, mis-labelling risks deepening the wound. As one analyst put it: “The wrong thing to do is to invade Nigeria and override the authorities or the authority of the Nigerian government. Doing that will be counter-productive.”

Global credibility: Nigeria claims to be the “giant of Africa,” yet if its foreign allies perceive it as failing to protect citizens, investments, aid and partnerships will falter.

Domestic narrative: If the government tolerates or ignores terror linked to any identity (ethnic, religious, regional) then its claim to protect “ALL NIGERIANS” rings hollow.

Hence Trump’s message (whether blunt or unilateral) demands Nigeria move. It places the burden first on national leadership. That is exactly how you framed his words: “He spoke against terrorists move fast.” That is valid.

Let us be clear; this is about TERROR, not FAITH.
It is tempting, perhaps politically expedient, to frame every attack as MUSLIM-ON-CHRISTIAN or NORTHERN-ON-SOUTHERN. The data suggests otherwise.

“While Christians are among those targeted, the vast majority of victims of armed groups are Muslims in Nigeria’s Muslim-majority north, where most attacks occur.”

This underlines the fact that Nigeria’s crisis is not simply one of religious hatred, but of FAILED GOVERNANCE, BROKEN SECURITY, HUNGER, DISPLACEMENT and CRIMINAL IMPUNITY. Yet when commentators label Trump’s message as ANTI-MUSLIM, they imply that Muslims are uniformly the perpetrators or automatically the victims when in reality, TERRORISM SPARES NONE.

If you stand for justice, for Nigerian lives (whether they are Muslim, Christian, traditionalist or otherwise) then you should support the call for decisive action. The message is universal; stop the killings, regardless of faith.

Why the outrage then? If Trump’s message is as you interpret (a challenge to terror and failed response) then why the outrage? Let me suggest:

Some hold to tribal or religious narratives and view any external intervention or threat as automatically hostile to their identity group, even when the message is not so.

Some fear loss of impunity. When terror actors are exposed, exploitation of communities for resource, land or politics becomes harder. So the message is resisted.

Misinformation spreads faster than nuance. Quick social-media posts, slogans, memes offer easy binaries. Muslim vs Christian, North vs South. The real nuance of “terror vs victim” is harder to sell.

Yet refusing to acknowledge the seriousness of the challenge does not make it go away.

What must Nigeria do now? The parties that bear responsibility are not just Abuja in theory, they include state governments, security services, local communities, civil society. The federal government has the central role. The concrete steps include:

Arrest, prosecute, convict the perpetrators of village destructions; regardless of their ethnicity or religion. Without accountability, deterrence is absent.

Protect displaced communities, rebuild homes, restore livelihoods, offer compensation. A community left without hope is fertile ground for further radicalisation.

Address root causes; poverty, youth unemployment, land conflicts, resource scarcity. Terror and militia violence thrive in neglected zones.

Narrate truth; Government must speak of the victims in all categories and resist selective victimhood. Recognise that terror acts on all Nigerians, not only one faith.

Engage partners but maintain sovereignty; If international assistance is welcomed, it must respect Nigerian leadership but hold it to result. As one expert put it, “The country must cultivate an atmosphere of transparency that allows external observers to assess the facts firsthand.”

The Way Forward.
Those interpreting Donald Trump’s statement as a war on Muslims are mis-reading the message. He invoked a conditional threat; you must act or risk intervention and he spotlighted terrorism, not an entire faith. If we truly want an end to the pain in Yelwata, Bokkos, Taraba and beyond, then every Nigerian (Muslim or Christian) must demand that the killers be caught, the violence halted, and the lives of ordinary citizens restored.

Supporters of the status quo will resist such demand. The uninformed will mislabel it. The truth remains, the demand is simple. Move fast. Stop the terror. Protect Nigerians. Restore dignity. If our leaders cannot hear the message or choose to misinterpret it, it is ordinary Nigerians who pay the price.

Let us not twist the words. Let us heed the substance. Our nation deserves nothing less.

 

Move Fast or Face the Consequence: A Call to Stop Terror, Not Muslims. By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyNG.com

news

Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration

Published

on

Journalists for Good Governance Shines Searchlight on Local Government Administration

…Calls for Accountability in Nigeria’s Grassroots Governance

 

LAGOS, Nigeria — A civil society coalition known as Journalists for Good Governance(JGG) has intensified public debate on transparency and accountability within Nigeria’s local government system, urging media professionals, civil society actors, and citizens to hold grassroots leaders accountable.

Speaking an event in Lagos recently, the acting chairman of the society, Comrade Bunmi Obarotimi said that despite reforms such as the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling granting financial autonomy to all 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs), systemic challenges continues to hinder effective service delivery and responsible stewardship of public funds.

“Local governments are the closest tier of government to the people — yet too often they remain the least transparent. Without civic oversight and vibrant media, promises of autonomy ring hollow.” the acting chairman said.

The Journalist for Good Governance emphasised crucial roles that journalists can play in uncovering discrepancies in council spending, flagging poor service delivery, and educating citizens on their rights. Their call comes amid wider efforts by media and civic organisations to bridge accountability gaps. The civil society initiatives had previously launched monitoring campaigns to track local government expenditures and have been quietly advocating for transparency in how public money is deployed.

The leaders of the Journalists for Good Governance (JGG) highlighted the importance of physical assessment and citizens engagement on projects to boost people’s confidence, urging local councils to adopt open data platforms and proactive information dissemination in compliance with the Freedom of Information Act. Experts say the majority of LGAs currently lack operational websites or digital portals, further limiting public scrutiny.

The Journalists for Good Governance initiative aligns with sustained advocacy by civil society groups and governance experts calling for a collective approach to strengthening democratic accountability, and has decided to engage in critical and holistic assessments of how Local Governments is being run and the impact and quality of projects they embark-on and to address deficits in transparency and public trust.
Meanwhile, some state governments have signalled support for improved community engagement. In Lagos State, authorities reiterated a commitment to enhancing community media platforms as vehicles for civic participation and accountability at the grassroots level.

The renewed spotlight on local government administration has reignited public debate over fiscal responsibility and priorities. Controversies such as the widely criticised Adamawa council chairmen’s wives trip to Istanbul — which drew public outrage for perceived misuse of public funds — underscore why watchdog groups say stronger oversight mechanisms are urgently needed at the grassroots.
Citizens and activists have welcomed the journalists’ initiative, calling for sustained media engagement that goes beyond headlines to influence policy and accountability reform.
The civic rights advocates note that real change will require robust legal frameworks, a free press, and empowered communities equipped to demand transparency at every level of governance.
As Journalists for Good Governance mobilises its members, the coming months are likely to see heightened media attention on grassroots administration — from council budgets and service delivery to the enforcement of public information laws and digital transparency initiatives.

Continue Reading

society

Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections

Published

on

Good Politics Or Just Power? Two Years After The Elections

 

Two years after the last general election, Nigerians are justified in asking a direct question: is our democracy stronger today than it was then? Democracy is not measured by how many offices a party controls or how loudly politicians speak. It is measured by integrity, accountability, and the lived experience of the people. Good Politics demands more than victory at the polls; it demands moral leadership and visible progress in the lives of citizens.

The debate over amendments to the Electoral Act should have provided an opportunity to deepen transparency and strengthen public confidence. Instead, hesitation to fully embrace reforms that safeguard credible vote transmission and accountability has fueled doubt. In a nation where electoral credibility remains fragile, any reluctance to reinforce safeguards sends the wrong signal. Good Politics stands firmly for processes that are open, fair, and beyond suspicion.

The party in power commands significant authority across the federation. With control of the presidency, many state governments, a strong presence in the National Assembly, and influence at local levels, there should be no anxiety about reforms that ensure free and fair elections. Confidence in leadership is demonstrated not by dominance, but by a willingness to subject power to scrutiny. Politics rooted in the omoluabi ethos embraces fairness, transparency, and responsibility, even when inconvenient.

This is the standard long associated with Awolowo, whose politics emphasized discipline, social welfare, education, and institutional strength. His vision was not merely about holding office, but about transforming society through principled governance. Good Politics follows that tradition. It rejects manipulation, arrogance, and the concentration of power without accountability. It insists that authority must serve the people, not itself.

Beyond electoral reforms, democracy must deliver tangible relief. Across the country, households struggle with rising prices and shrinking purchasing power. Small businesses are burdened by escalating costs. Young people search for opportunities that remain scarce. When economic hardship deepens, democracy feels abstract. Good Politics recognizes that political legitimacy is reinforced when citizens can see and feel the benefits of governance.

The concentration of power within a single political structure should translate into coordinated reform and measurable development. When it does not, questions naturally arise. Democracy weakens when dominance replaces performance. It weakens when loyalty to party eclipses loyalty to principle. The omoluabi tradition teaches that character defines leadership. Without character, authority becomes hollow.

A healthy democracy requires credible elections and compassionate governance. It requires leaders who understand that politics is a moral enterprise. Two years into this administration, many Nigerians remain uncertain about the direction of both our democratic processes and their daily welfare. If democracy is to endure, it must reflect Good Politics: fairness in competition, integrity in conduct, and compassion in governance. Anything less falls short of the standard that our history and our values demand.

 

 

Continue Reading

news

GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA

Published

on

GEN CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE COMMENDS STATE-FEDERAL COLLABORATION IN ZAMFARA

 

The Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa Support Initiative (GCGMSI) has commended the Zamfara State Government for its decisive contribution to security operations through the donation of newly acquired armoured personnel carriers (APCs), surveillance drones, and other critical operational equipment to troops and security agencies in the state.

 

This commendation was contained in a statement signed by the Convener of the GCGMSI, Ibrahim Dahiru Danfulani, Sadaukin Garkuwan Keffi/Betara Biu, and made available to the press.

 

The equipment was formally commissioned on Wednesday, February 18, by the Grand Patron of the GCGMSI and Minister of Defence, General Christopher Gwabin Musa, OFR (rtd.), in a ceremony at the Government House, Gusau. The event was attended by senior military officers, heads of security agencies, and top officials of the Zamfara State Government.

 

The GCGMSI, in its statement, hailed the donation as a “transformative and timely intervention” that aligns perfectly with its core objective of advocating for and supporting tangible measures that enhance the operational capacity and welfare of Nigeria’s security forces. The Initiative praised Governor Dauda Lawal’s administration for moving beyond rhetoric to actionable, material support, describing the move as a “blueprint for state-level collaboration in national security.”

 

“The provision of these assets by the Zamfara State Government is a testament to visionary leadership and a profound commitment to the peace and stability of its people,” the GCGMSI statement read. “It represents the exact kind of synergistic partnership between state and federal authorities that the GCGMSI champions. This initiative will significantly close operational gaps, boost the confidence of our gallant troops, and send a strong message to criminal elements.”

 

Speaking at the commissioning, General Musa emphasized that sustained collaboration is indispensable in confronting the nation’s evolving security challenges. He specifically commended Governor Lawal for his proactive support.

 

“Governor Dauda Lawal has demonstrated exemplary leadership and an unwavering dedication to the security of Zamfara State,” the Defence Minister stated. “The provision of these armoured vehicles, surveillance drones, and other operational equipment will undoubtedly boost the morale and operational effectiveness of our troops and other security agencies on the ground. This is a commendable effort that should be emulated by others.”

 

The newly commissioned assets, which include multiple APCs and advanced surveillance drones, are expected to dramatically enhance the mobility, protection, intelligence-gathering, and rapid response capabilities of security forces, particularly in the state’s remote and difficult terrains where anti-banditry operations are ongoing.

 

In his remarks, Governor Lawal reiterated his administration’s steadfast commitment to being a reliable partner in the security architecture. He urged security agencies to deploy the new resources responsibly and effectively to safeguard lives and property.

 

The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Defence, reaffirmed its commitment to continuing and deepening such partnerships with state governments across the nation to strengthen coordination and resource allocation in the collective fight against insecurity.

 

The GCGMSI concluded its statement by urging other state governments to take a cue from Zamfara’s “bold and pragmatic” approach, affirming that such concrete support is vital for achieving lasting peace and security across Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending