Religion, Tribalism, and Political Issues Affecting Nigerians at Home and Abroad

By George O. Sylvester

Nigeria, a nation blessed with vast natural resources, a rich cultural heritage, and a resilient people, faces significant challenges that threaten its very foundation. As former President Olusegun Obasanjo once noted,

“Nigeria is a complex country, and we have to be careful not to allow our diversity to become a source of weakness, but rather a source of strength.”

Unfortunately, instead of being a unifying force, Nigeria’s diversity has increasingly become a source of division, with religion, tribalism, and politics driving deep wedges between its people.

Religion: A Tool for Unity or Division?

Religion plays a significant role in the lives of Nigerians, shaping their values, governance, and social interactions. The country is almost evenly split between Christians and Muslims, with a minority practicing indigenous religions. While faith should ideally promote peace and moral conduct, Nigeria’s religious landscape has often been a battleground for political influence, social conflict, and even violence.

Religious differences have contributed to some of the country’s worst crises, from the 1966 coup and the subsequent civil war to the rise of extremist groups like Boko Haram. The insurgency, which started in the northeast, has left tens of thousands dead and displaced millions. However, religious tension is not confined to terrorism; periodic clashes between Christian and Muslim communities over land, politics, and governance have occurred in states like Kaduna, Plateau, and Benue.

Yet, the Quran reminds us:

“O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another.” — (Quran 49:13)

Similarly, the Bible teaches:

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” — (Galatians 3:28)

Despite these messages of unity, religious leaders and politicians frequently exploit religious sentiments to gain followers and suppress opposition. Churches and mosques often serve as political arenas where leaders mobilize their congregations for electoral victories rather than promoting national unity. The recent controversy over Muslim-Muslim or Christian-Christian ticket debates in presidential elections further exemplifies how religion is often weaponized in Nigerian politics.

However, there have been instances where religion has fostered peace and unity. Initiatives such as interfaith dialogues, the National Mosque and National Christian Centre collaborations, and efforts by organizations like the Nigeria Inter-Religious Council (NIREC) have attempted to bridge the divide. If more religious leaders advocate for unity rather than division, Nigeria could harness its religious diversity for progress rather than conflict.

Tribalism and Political Struggles

Tribalism has long been a significant factor in Nigeria’s political and social landscape. With over 250 ethnic groups, Nigeria is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. The three largest groups—the Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo—dominate national politics, often to the detriment of smaller ethnic minorities.

Since gaining independence in 1960, ethnic loyalties have frequently overshadowed national interests. The civil war (1967–1970) between the Nigerian government and the secessionist state of Biafra was one of the most devastating consequences of ethnic tensions. Although the war ended over 50 years ago, ethnic grievances persist. Many Igbos feel politically marginalized, while the Yoruba and Hausa-Fulani continue to dominate the political scene.

Ethnic-based political alliances have also fueled corruption and nepotism. Political parties in Nigeria often reflect ethnic interests rather than ideological differences. Leaders distribute resources and political appointments based on tribal affiliations rather than competence, leading to inefficiency in governance. The persistent calls for restructuring and self-determination by groups like the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and the Oduduwa Republic movement highlight the dissatisfaction of many ethnic groups with the current federal structure.

Even among Nigerians in the diaspora, ethnic divisions remain evident. Rather than uniting as one Nigerian community, ethnic groups frequently organize their separate events and institutions. A striking example of this division was seen in the recent passport intervention program in South Africa, which was designed to assist Nigerians abroad with passport renewal and other consular services. Unfortunately, the program was marred by controversy and infighting, with different ethnic and interest groups vying for control and influence, further highlighting the deep-seated divisions among Nigerians.

Politics and the Struggle for Power

Political instability has been a major hindrance to Nigeria’s development. The country has experienced multiple military coups, civilian regimes plagued by corruption, and electoral malpractices that undermine democratic principles. Despite transitioning to democracy in 1999, the political landscape remains fragile, with widespread voter suppression, election violence, and allegations of rigging.

One of Nigeria’s major political issues is the failure of leadership to address the country’s socio-economic challenges. Politicians often prioritize personal and ethnic interests over national development. The lack of accountability has led to widespread corruption, with billions of dollars stolen from public coffers while basic amenities such as electricity, healthcare, and education remain underfunded.

Additionally, political power struggles have fueled violence across the country. The farmer-herder clashes in the Middle Belt, banditry in the Northwest, and the resurgence of militancy in the Niger Delta all have political undertones. Many of these conflicts are exacerbated by poor governance, economic hardship, and a lack of political will to address root causes.

As Nigeria prepares for future elections, the need for electoral reforms, stronger institutions, and credible leadership has never been more critical. The success of the 2023 general elections demonstrated some progress, with the introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) reducing electoral fraud. However, more needs to be done to ensure free and fair elections that reflect the people’s will.

A Call for Unity and National Consensus

To overcome these challenges, Nigerians—both at home and abroad—must come together to forge a new national consensus, one that prioritizes unity, inclusivity, and the common good. As former President Olusegun Obasanjo stated,

“Nigeria’s future is bright, but we must work together to achieve it.

”

Similarly, Nigerian-American writer Teju Cole observed,

“The Nigerian diaspora is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, and we must find ways to navigate its complexities.”

For Nigeria to progress, certain key actions must be taken:

1. Promoting National Identity Over Ethnic Loyalty

Nigeria must foster a national identity that transcends tribal and religious lines. This can be achieved through inclusive policies, unbiased historical education, and national programs that encourage unity.

2. Strengthening Institutions and the Rule of Law

A strong legal system that holds leaders accountable will reduce corruption and ensure that governance benefits all Nigerians, not just a privileged few. Electoral reforms and anti-corruption measures must be enforced to restore faith in the government.

3. Encouraging Religious Tolerance and Interfaith Dialogue

Religious leaders and institutions must actively promote peace, coexistence, and mutual respect among Nigeria’s diverse faith communities. Interfaith initiatives should be expanded to bridge divides and counteract extremist ideologies.

4. Fostering Unity Among the Nigerian Diaspora

Nigerians abroad should see themselves as ambassadors of one nation, rather than representatives of separate ethnic groups. The diaspora can play a key role in national development through investments, knowledge transfer, and advocacy for democratic governance.

5. Ensuring Economic and Social Development

Economic disparity is a major driver of conflict. Policies that promote job creation, education, and poverty alleviation will help reduce the frustration that fuels religious extremism and ethnic tension.

Conclusion

Now is the time for Nigerians—both within the country and in the diaspora—to rise above divisions and work toward a brighter, more unified future. Nigeria has the potential to be a global powerhouse, but only if its people can look beyond their differences and work together for the common good.

The road to unity is not easy, but as history has shown, great nations are built not on division, but on the strength of a united people. Nigerians must choose whether to be held back by their differences or to embrace their diversity as a tool for progress. The choice is clear: unity, peace, and development must take precedence over tribalism, religious intolerance, and political selfishness. Only then can Nigeria fulfill its vast potential and become the great country its people deserve.

Obasa Condoles with APC Chairman over Wife’s Death

Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. (Dr) Mudashiru Obasa, has commiserated with Pastor Cornelius Ojelabi, chairman of the Lagos State All Progressives Congress (APC) on the demise of his wife, Ebunoluwa.

In a condolence letter signed by the Speaker, he stated, “I was deeply saddened to hear about the loss of your beloved wife, Mrs Ebunoluwa Esther Ojelabi, to the cold hands of death. My heart goes out to you and your family during this incredibly difficult time.

“Please accept my sincerest condolences. May the love and support of those around you provide comfort and peace as you navigate this profound loss. May the beautiful memories you shared with your wife be a source of strength and solace in the days ahead.”

Speaker Obasa stated further that as a leader and the chief pilot of the party in Lagos State, he had had the privilege of working with Ojelabi, and “I can attest to your dedication, compassion, and strength. I do not doubt that these qualities will carry you through this challenging time. You and your family are in my thoughts and prayers.”

Rivers Crisis: PDP Governors Challenge Emergency Rule at Supreme Court

By George O. Sylvester

The political climate in Nigeria has taken a dramatic turn as governors of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have filed a lawsuit at the Supreme Court, challenging President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The emergency proclamation, made on March 18, saw Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy Ngozi Odu, and all members of the state House of Assembly suspended for six months. In their place, the president appointed retired Vice-Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas as the sole administrator of the state.

This move has sparked nationwide debate, with the PDP governors contending that it constitutes a flagrant violation of constitutional provisions. The plaintiffs—governors of Bauchi, Adamawa, Bayelsa, Enugu, Osun, Plateau, and Zamfara states—assert that the president lacks the authority to unilaterally suspend a democratically elected governor and deputy governor. In their submission, they argue that the appointment of a sole administrator is not only unconstitutional but also sets a dangerous precedent for Nigeria’s democracy.

A Legal and Constitutional Showdown
According to court documents filed by the PDP governors, the emergency proclamation contravenes several sections of the Nigerian Constitution, particularly Sections 1(2), 5(2), and 305 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). Section 1(2) of the Constitution explicitly states that “the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.” The plaintiffs argue that by suspending the duly elected governor and deputy governor, the president has usurped powers that the Constitution does not grant him.

Furthermore, the governors maintain that Section 305, which outlines the conditions under which a state of emergency can be declared, does not empower the president to suspend elected officials. The section provides that a state of emergency may be declared in the case of war, natural disasters, public disorder, or breakdown of law and order. However, the plaintiffs argue that the situation in Rivers State did not meet these stringent conditions.